Penny for Paths Ballot Initiative Frequently Asked Questions

Similar documents
San Francisco s Capital Plan & the Mayor s Transportation Task Force 2030: Funding the next steps for transportation

CITY OF PORTSMOUTH PLANNING DEPARTMENT

Walkable Community Workshop Report

Westgate/Belvedere Homes Community Redevelopment Agency. Belvedere Heights. Streetlights & Sidewalks Improvements Project.

West End Connectivity Master Plan

City of Atlanta-MARTA Sales Tax Referendum Draft Project List. Atlanta City Council Work Session May 19, 2016

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Promoting Active Communities Award Application

CITY OF KASSON TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES KASSON SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL

Blue Ribbon Commission Report Recommendations on Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure Improvements

SUMMARY OF TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY SPECIAL AGENDA ITEM NO. _1A_

May 12, 2016 Metro Potential Ballot Measure Issue Brief: Local Return

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY

El Paso County 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan

2012 Capital Budget Capital Improvement Program

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Merced County Association of Governments: Voter Survey

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2020 TAP PUBLIC COMMENTS

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

Chapter 14 PARLIER RELATIONSHIP TO CITY PLANS AND POLICIES. Recommendations to Improve Pedestrian Safety in the City of Parlier (2014)

TULSA CITY COUNCIL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TASK FORCE MEETING JANUARY

Public Opinion about Transportation Issues in Northern Virginia

Watertown Complete Streets Prioritization Plan. Public Meeting #1 December 14, 2017

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Engineering - Bicycle and Pedestrian

Ocean Park Boulevard Streetscape Improvement Project Alternatives & Trade Offs

Climate Change Action Plan: Transportation Sector Discussion Paper: Cycling

Summary of Comments Public Meeting: Marietta Street Resurfacing Project Atlanta Contemporary August 29, 2017 / 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm

Hennepin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning

City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Work Session

FY Transportation Capital Improvement Plan Update Arlington Committee for Transportation Choices

Bikeable/Walkable Community Plan. Oct. 11, 2012 City Council Workshop

LOCAL REVENUE MEASURE ANNUAL COMMUNITY REPORT

Safe Streets. City of Lake Forest Park. March 21, 2017

Sistrunk Corridor DOTMOCRACY SUMMARY

North Avenue Corridor Study

PROJECT OVERVIEW. Auburn Station Access Improvements Project

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for Fiscal Years Presentation to Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission July 18, 2018

Multi Modal Transit Access Plan KIPDA ID # 239. Project Type: STUDY

Transportation Authority of Marin Renew Existing ½-cent Transportation Sales Tax

Belvedere Heights Streetlights & Sidewalks Improvements Project

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

The Bike Buzz in Richland. November 2017 Carl Berkowitz

MONTGOMERY COUNTY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM

East Burke Transportation, Safety and Capacity Improvements

A Matter of Fairness: ROCOG s Environmental Justice Protocol. What is Mobility Limitation?

Mayor s Bicycle Advisory Council. Wednesday, December 13 th, 2017

CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

Ocean Park Boulevard Green Street Project Alternatives & Trade Offs

Ocean Park Boulevard Green Street Project Community Workshop

What are the Qualities that make Newark a Bicycle Friendly Community? What are aspects that make Newark less Bicycle Friendly?

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

PRIORITIES RESULTS YOUR PRIORITIES FOR BRIDGEPORT 5% 4% 13% RESIDENTIAL CHOICES TRAILS & PARKS

2012 PRIORITY TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS

WALKNBIKE DRAFT PLAN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

Improvements Infrastructure Gap Assessment and Improvements Street Striping

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

ITEM 3 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION NO

Land Use Bicycle Spaces Required Type Residential

Plant City Walk-Bike Plan

5 th & Avon Community Brainstorm

Capital and Strategic Planning Committee. Item III - B. April 12, WMATA s Transit-Oriented Development Objectives

DES MOINES AREA MPO. Presentation to Iowa Commercial Real Estate Association. April 6, 2017

P.O. Box 1749 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada Item No. Halifax Regional Council January 16, 2017

PEDALING FORWARD. A Glance at the SFMTA s Bike Program for SFMTA.COM

Irondale on the Move Public Outreach Summary to Date. July 8, 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary

San Tomas Expressway

Sebastopol Charter School Traffic Management Plan

Work Session. Agenda Item # 4. Meeting Date September 8, Daryl Braithwaite Public Works Director. Prepared By. Suzanne R. Ludlow City Manager

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

City Birmingham Multi-Modal Transportation Plan Visioning Workshop Results Meeting

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL

Pavement Management Report. City Council Meeting of May 21, 2013

Bicycle Transportation Budget Plan: Lawrence, KS

Pedestrian, Bicycle and Traffic Calming Strategic Implementation Plan. January 18, 2011

Rochester Downtown Bicycle Study 2009

Project Overview. Rolling Road Widening Fairfax County. Get Involved. Design Public Hearing. Contact Information

Bicycle-Pedestrian Master Plan: Chapters 3 and 4 Distribution

CITY MANUALS AND STANDARDS REVIEW

2011 Capital Projects University Area - Community Council Priority List Municipality of Anchorage

Colchester/Riverside/Barrett/ Mill Intersection Study. PAC Meeting #3 September 22, 2016

Chapter 13 ORANGE COVE

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

Do you support funding a Vision Zero approach for pedestrian & cycling safety citywide?

PRESS RELEASE San Joaquin Council of Governments

Third Street Bridge & Corridor Project

Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan for Public Right-of-Way Improvements

STONY PLAIN ROAD STREETSCAPE

Keep Placer Moving. Placer is Growing. POPULATION (From 2014 to 2045) 70,000 new homes and well over 180,000 more residents

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, CA

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

City of Wilsonville 5 th Street to Kinsman Road Extension Project

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION/NONMOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION

Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Toolbox (Excerpt from Figure 3.1)

Flanders Crossing. Save Lives Save Money Saving Our Environment. Portland City Council April 30, 2008

Transcription:

Penny for Paths Ballot Initiative Frequently Asked Questions What is the Penny for Paths ballot initiative? Why do we have gaps in our bicycle and pedestrian recreation paths, crosswalks, bike lanes and sidewalks? What are voters being asked to approve on the August 14 ballot? What is the actual wording of the Penny for Paths articles that voters will see on the ballot? What will the funds raised by the Penny for Paths assessment be used for? What are the priority recreation paths, sidewalks, crosswalks and bike lanes that the Penny for Paths is expected to help fund? Why are new recreation paths and crosswalks not already paid for in the City budget? How can I help support the Penny for Paths Close the Gaps ballot initiative? What is the Penny for Paths ballot initiative? The South Burlington City Council has unanimously voted to place the Penny for Paths initiative on the August 14, 2018 ballot. This initiative strengthens the City s bicycle and pedestrian system in order to enhance safety and the quality of life of residents -- and to better connect residents to schools, parks, businesses, City Center and other neighborhoods and towns. Why do we have gaps in our bicycle and pedestrian recreation paths, crosswalks, bike lanes and sidewalks? The City has been blessed with many miles of mostly developer-financed recreation paths and sidewalks. However, gaps exist. The paths and sidewalks were built for specific neighborhoods and not necessarily to connect neighborhoods to one another and to schools, workplaces, retail stores and other common areas like parks. This is no one s fault. It is just how development has evolved over the years. What are voters being asked to approve on the August 14 ballot? In summary, the two articles are as follows: Article I: Will assess one penny for every $100 of valuation on a property owner's tax bill for 10 years. The annual cost on an average SB single family home with an assessed value of $336,111 is $33.61. The annual cost on an average condominium of $241,356 is $24.14.

Article II: If the first Article passes, will allow the City to use part of the revenues raised to fund bond(s) to allow work to be done sooner. The bond(s) will be paid for by the penny. What is the actual wording of the Penny for Paths articles that voters will see on the ballot? ARTICLE I: APPROVAL OF TEN YEAR TAX FOR BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS Starting in FY 2020 for a period of ten years, shall the City be authorized to levy an additional one penny on the annual city tax rate, the entirety of the proceeds of which are to be deposited into a reserve fund established by the City Council for the sole purpose of bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure improvements within the City? [ ] Yes [ ] No ARTICLE II: INCURRING BONDED DEBT FOR BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS If Article I receives a vote in the affirmative, shall bonds of the City be issued in an amount not to exceed the anticipated proceeds of the ten year one penny tax levy on the annual city tax rate, of an anticipated total amount of $2,968,537.25, for the sole purpose of funding bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure improvements within the City? [ ] Yes [ ] No Remember, the cost and debt service of the bond(s) is paid for by the Penny. What will the funds raised by the Penny for Paths assessment be used for? This assessment (one cent per $100) is intended to fund recreation paths, sidewalks, pedestrian trails, bike lanes, crosswalks, and roadway signals. Project costs may include design, right-of-way acquisition, construction, related grant costs and project management. The assessment is to be used to fund new paths, crosswalks, etc and not for funding ongoing maintenance. It could also fund improvements such as the widening of an existing path or the re-routing of an existing path in order to separate it further from a busy road. The City s Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee has prioritized certain projects based on input from residents and other criteria, but it intends to be opportunistic and leverage the $300,000 expected to be raised each year from the Penny for Paths initiative funds as it works to close the gaps in the recreation path system and other bicycling and pedestrian infrastructure. When a developer or employer is ready to share in the cost of

a gap closing project or when a grant becomes available for a project, that project may move up in priority. What are the priority recreation paths, sidewalks, crosswalks and bike lanes that the Penny for Paths is expected to help fund? In 2016, the South Burlington Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee (SBBPC) completed a project whereby residents from the five City Quadrants were asked to recommend to the Committee their priority suggested projects that would help to close the gaps in the City s bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure. Using this information, the SBBPC prioritized the more than 70 projects by weighting criteria including safety, connectivity to existing infrastructure, the number of people impacted and major commuting route, among others. The priority bike lanes (white fog lines) are being painted by the Department of Public Works (DPW) using an extra $20,000 in FY 2019 funding approved by the City Council through the efforts of the SBBPC combined with the its normal road paving and line striping budget. The DPW is using a South Burlington Fog Line & Bike Lane Assessment tool created by the SBBPC to prioritize which bike lanes are striped first with the available funds. The priority new recreation (multi-use) paths are as follows: Rank City Quadrant Rec Path (Unless Noted) Street Start End 1 SE Dorset Street Old Cross Sadie Lane 2 SW Allen Baycrest Drive Spear Street 3 SW 4 SW 5 NW Allen (Rec Path or Sidewalk being scoped) Spear Street (east side) Spear Street Jug Handle Shelburne Spear Street Rec Path at US Forest Service Building UVM campus 6 NE Kimball Ave Kennedy Drive Farm Stand Apartments (Baycrest Path) Swift Street Rec Path at Spear and Swift East Terrace Potash Brook Bridge

7 NW Hinesburg Williston Kennedy Drive 8 SW Queen City Park Shelburne Queen City Park 9 NE Airport Parkway Kirby Lime Kiln Note: Excludes City Center District multi-use paths that are being funded separately. The priority new crosswalks are as follows: Rank City Quadrant Street Start End 1 SW 2 SW Route 7 & Queen City Crossing Swift Street and Spear Street Crossing Lindenwood Drive Swift Street Queen City Parkway Spear Street 3 NW Hinesburg Village Green Rd Ruth Street 4 NW Hinesburg Prouty Pkwy West Side Sidewalk 5 NW Hinesburg Wright Court West Side Sidewalk 6 NW Williston Elmson Parkway 7 NW Williston Mills Avenue Pillsbury Manor North (Gazebo Senior Living) Bus stop and restaurants on other side of Williston Rd. 8 NW Hinesburg Eldridge Hayes 9 NW Kennedy Drive West Twin Oaks Terrace North Side of Kennedy Drive 10 SE Van Sicklen Rd & Hinesburg Rd Crossing Van Sicklen Hinesburg Why are new recreation paths and crosswalks not already paid for in the City budget? The current city budget allows for maintaining the existing bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, but not for expanding and improving it. Penny for Paths will make our city safer and will enhance the connections between our neighborhoods. The fiscal 2019 increase in the grand list was barely enough to fund required increases in staff health insurance, pension cost and compensation.

How can I help support the Penny for Paths Close the Gaps ballot initiative? If you are interested in showing support for the initiative, please visit the South Burlington page of the Local Motion website at www.localmotion.org/south_burlington. By clicking on Support Penny for Paths (https://www.localmotion.org/penny_for_paths_endorse) you can add your name to list of supporters of the initiative, donate funds to pay for lawn signs, brochures, postcards, newspaper advertisements, etc. and join the Friends for a Walkable-Bikeable South Burlington. As a Friend, your help is needed to pass out brochures and cards to your neighbors and generally get the word out to encourage your neighbors to vote in favor of the initiative. Please email friendssbpath@gmail.com with any questions and/or if you wish to help. Thank you.