Fisheries Sampling Technical Memorandum

Similar documents
Lake St. Clair Fish Community and Fishery

Full Project Proposal

BA1 BA2 BA3 BA4 BA5 BA6 CP1 CP2 CP3 CP4 CP5 CP6

Thunder Bay River Assessment Appendix. Appendix 2

2014 Threatened and Endangered Fish Survey of. East Loon Lake and West Loon Lake. Lake County, Illinois

Conewago Creek Initiative

Flint River Assessment Appendix

Conewago Creek Initiative. Fish Survey Report for the Conewago Creek

Fisheries Review with Respect to Stormwater Management for Milton/Navan Road Property

APPENDIX 3. Distribution Maps of Fish Species

FISH COMMUNITIES AND FISHERIES OF THE THOUSAND ISLANDS AND MIDDLE CORRIDOR

Tittabawassee River Assessment. Miles. Gladwin Smallwood Impoundment. Harrison. Clare. Midland. Mt. Pleasant. St. Louis. Saginaw.

Fish community assessment in the Harpeth River prior to the removal of the dam at Franklin, TN

Rouge Fish Surveys

Caro Impoundment, Tuscola County

Fish Survey of Arctic Lake (ID # ), Scott County, Minnesota in 2012

feeding - clear moderate-sized shallow streams with moderate vegetation spawning - nests in gravel, sand, or hard rock substrate

Lake Superior. Ontonagon River Assessment. Ontonagon. Rockland. Victoria Dam. Bergland. Bergland. Dam. Bruce Crossing Agate Falls. Kenton Lower.

OTTER TAIL RIVER PROJECT (FERC NO ) OTTER TAIL POWER COMPANY INITIAL STUDY REPORT 2017 AQUATIC STUDIES APRIL 26, 2018

Columbia Lake Dam Removal Project

SUMMARY REPORT FOR LAKE ST. MALO FISHERIES ASSESSMENT. Prepared for the St. Malo and District Wildlife Association

FISHES OF THE KNIFE LAKE WATERSHED IN KANABEC AND MILLE LACS COUNTIES OF MINNESOTA. Konrad Schmidt, Vice-President

Methods for Evaluating Shallow Water Habitat Restoration in the St. Clair River

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FISH COMMUNITY AND HABITAT EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT

Fish Assemblages and Stream Conditions in the Kishwaukee River Basin: Spatial and Temporal Trends,

Quemahoning Reservoir

Tahquamenon River Assessment Appendix

(/ North Branch Raritan River - FIBI031 % FIBI031

Black crappie (Pomoxis nigromaculatus)

Cedar Lake Comprehensive Survey Report Steve Hogler and Steve Surendonk WDNR-Mishicot

Using Habitat Guilds to Develop Habitat Suitability Criteria for a Warmwater Stream Fish Assemblage. Jason Persinger, Don Orth,, Tammy Newcomb

ATTACHMENT F. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Marsh Lake Ecosystem Restoration Project

Quillback (Carpoides cyprinus)

MINNESOTA FRESHWATER MUSSEL SURVEY AND RELOCATION PROTOCOL

Au Sable River Assessment Appendix

Rehabilitation of Grimes Creek, a Stream Impacted in the Past by Bucket-lined Dredge Gold Mining, Boise River Drainage, July 2008 to August 2011.

feeding - downstream sections of large rivers, lakes, and impoundments

SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM

Great Lakes Coastal Wetland Communities: Vulnerabilities to Climate Change and Response to Adaptation Strategies

Fish community assessment of the Harpeth River before and after a habitat restoration project in Franklin, Tennessee

I L L I N 0 PRODUCTION NOTE. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Large-scale Digitization Project, 2007.

Site 4 PEESHOO. Approx. Head = 10 m Design Flow = 70 m 3 /s Capacity = 6 MW. Peeshoo. Kabinakagami River. Rogers Road HWY 11.

Appendix A Photo Set

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Student Worksheet: River Health and Indicator Species

Crooked Lake Oakland County (T4N, R9E, Sections 3, 4, 9) Surveyed May James T. Francis

Manual of Fisheries Survey Methods II: with periodic updates. Chapter 22: Guidelines for Sampling Warmwater Rivers with Rotenone

Fisheries Survey of White Rapids Flowage, Marinette County Wisconsin during Waterbody Identification Code

HURON RIVER WATERSHED

Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1. Weber Lake Cheboygan County, T34N, R3W, Sec.

FISH PROTECTION ACTIVITIES AT PRADO DAM, CORONA, CA.

Trip Report: Eagle Creek, Arizona

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE. Gamefish Assessment Report

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

American Currents Spring 1993 Vol 19 No 1

Upper/Lower Owl Creek Reservoir

Report prepared for: Prepared by: January 2002 BEAK Ref

Manistee River Assessment Appendix

FISH ASSEMBLAGE ASSESSMENT

EVALUATION OF THE FISH COMMUNITY AND GAME FISH POPULATIONS IN SUGAR CREEK (MONTGOMERY AND PARKE COUNTIES)

Evaluation of Newbury Weirs (Rock Riffles) for Improving Habitat Quality and Biotic Diversity in Illinois Streams.

Annex B SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION. Table of Contents. Scientific Names of Select Plants and Animals. Fish species collected in Curwensville Lake

Lake LeAnn 2018 Fish Survey

Steelhead Society of BC. Thompson River Watershed Restoration and Enhancement Project #4 Nicola River Bank Stabilization and Enhancement Project

Jason Blackburn, Paul Hvenegaard, Dave Jackson, Tyler Johns, Chad Judd, Scott Seward and Juanna Thompson

Elk Lake, Antrim and Grand Traverse counties T. 28, 29 N., R. 8, 9 W., Sec. many. Lake surveys. began at 40 feet

Fish Community. Fish Habitat, Streams and Rivers

Ecology and control of invasive Northern Pike in the Columbia River, Canada

Alcona Dam Pond Alcona County (T25N, R5E, Sections various) Surveyed June 6-12 and September 16, 2003

Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Commission Biologist Report. Wilmore Dam. Cambria County. May 2011 Trap Net, Electrofishing and Hoop Net Survey

Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2777 SURVEY OF THE FISH ASSEMBLAGES OF ST. LAWRENCE ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK IN 2005

Columbia Lake Dam Removal Project

REC 6 FISHERIES HABITAT EVALUATION

Investigating reproduction and abundance of bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) and silver carp (H. molitrix) in the Greenup pool, Ohio River

Appendix C Bill Cross Rapids Freshwater Mussel and Fishery Study Plan

Removal of natural obstructions to improve Atlantic Salmon and Brook Trout habitat in western NL. 26/02/2015 Version 2.0

Study Update Tailrace Slough Use by Anadromous Salmonids

COLUMBIA LAKE DAM REMOVAL PROJECT

Preakness Brook - FIBI098

Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture Annual Report The Nature Conservancy 2013

Little Calumet River Rapid Response Fish Identification and Enumeration Branch Summary Report

Illinois Lake Management Association Conference March 23, 2018 By Trent Thomas Illinois Department of Natural Resources Division of Fisheries

Don Pedro Project Relicensing

MISSISSIPPI MAKEOVER A Plan for Restoration, Just Around the Bend

SUMMARY OF CONOWINGO DAM WEST FISH LIFT OPERATIONS 2012

Freshwater Fish Assessment

Final Bull Trout Redd Monitoring Report for the Wallowa Falls Hydroelectric Project

2018 ONTARIO FISH IDENTIFICATION WORKSHOPS

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Holderness. The Three Watersheds within the Newfound Lake Drainage Dorchester. Groton Plymouth. Ashland. Hebron. Canaan. Bridgewater.

JadEco, LLC PO BOX 445 Shannon, IL 61078

Indiana Administrative Code Page IAC Aquaculture permit Authority: IC Affected: IC Sec. 17. (a) A person must not

Study Update Fish Distribution and Species Composition

Abundance of Steelhead and Coho Salmon in the Lagunitas Creek Drainage, Marin County, California

Stony Creek Creel Census

Appendix D Spring Fisheries Investigations - Data Report (Hatch, 2012d)

BIG TWIN LAKE Kalkaska County (T28N, R05W, Section 18, and T28N, R06W, Section 13) Surveyed May 1999

2017 ONTARIO FISH IDENTIFICATION WORKSHOPS

Survey for Fishes in Freeman Creek System and North River, Fayette and Tuscaloosa Counties, Alabama, on 26 May Submitted to:

The relationship between the spatial distribution of common carp and their environmental DNA in a small lake

Transcription:

Appendix C Fisheries Sampling Technical Memorandum 2016 Google

MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Tom Mahood, P.Eng., CH2M Arnie Fausto, M.Sc., and Erica Wilkinson, B.A., ERPG, Matrix Solutions Inc. SUBJECT: Fisheries Survey Summary, Thames River - One River Master Plan Environmental Assessment DATE: October 12, 2017 1 INTRODUCTION The One River Master Plan Environmental Assessment (EA) was initiated by the City of London (The City) in March 2017 to integrate the planned improvement projects on the Thames River and adjacent valley corridor. The goal of the project is to evaluate all the projects as a whole and determine the feasibility of implementing specific projects in consideration of others. An initial step of the project is to compile and document existing environmental background data of the Thames River and valley corridor within the project s study area. During the review it was noted that additional ecological information was required to supplement both spatial and temporary gaps throughout the study area to characterize the current environmental setting. The two main field components of the data gap analysis include a review of geomorphic conditions and updated fisheries survey. The main objective in collecting 2017 fisheries field data was to ensure that at least a portion of the spring and summer fisheries are captured and reviewed in the areas around Springbank Dam and the Forks. Historical fisheries data has largely been compiled by fish sampling records from Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO), Royal Ontario Museum, Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF), and Upper Thames River Conservation Authority between 1967 and 2015. However, the majority of these studies occurred in the upstream portion of the study area within the North Thames Branch and downstream of the Springbank Dam. It anticipated that the non-operation of Springbank Dam in 2006 has altered many components of the natural environment including the riverine function and aquatic habitat, allowing species to freely migrate up and downstream along with changes associated with the transformation of this once impounded habitat to a free-flowing river system. The proposed 2017 fisheries program included two seasonal field visits which were targeted to occur in late spring and late summer. This memo describes the target areas, methods, and results of the initial fisheries survey, completed on June 6 and June 7, 2017 and the second survey, completed on September 6 and 7, 2017. While the intent was to schedule the initial sampling earlier during May, high river water levels and frequent large rainfall events prevented river access until the early part of June. The second sampling in September was during a period of mild weather, with slightly higher flows than the June visit due to rain events. Unit 7B - 650 Woodlawn Rd. W. Guelph, ON N1K 1B8 24504-528 Fisheries Summary 2017-10-12 draft.docx T 519.772.3777 F 226.314.1908 www.matrix-solutions.com

1.1 Study Area The One River study area covers 9 km of the Thames River including portions of the North and South Thames branches. The area is confined by the Blackfriars Bridge on the North Thames River, the Hunt Weir on the South Thames River, and the Byron Bridge, past Springbank Dam downstream on the main Thames River. An overview of the project study area is provided on Figure 1.1. 1.2 Species at Risk Background The presence of Species at Risk (SAR) is an important consideration in the One River EA, particularly since there has been information gaps identified regarding more recent SAR distribution and sampling information after the non-operation of the Springbank Dam. As part of field work, information on the presence of SAR fish, as well as other fish species and their utilization of the newly created habitat, needed to be obtained. These are factors that would be affected by the Springbank Dam alternatives, as well as other projects anticipated as part of the Back to the River initiative in the downtown area of London. Several SAR have been listed to occur within the One River study area and document in the Background Environmental Data Report prepared by Matrix in June 2017. Distribution of Fish Species at Risk (DFO 2016) maps has also highlighted critical habitats for SAR throughout the study area. Table 1 summarizes SAR that may inhabit the study area. Historically, three of the listed SAR have been caught in or directly adjacent to the One River study area, including Black Redhorse, Silver Shiner, and Spotted Sucker. In June 2017, one round of fish sampling was completed under an MNRF Scientific Collectors Permit which was non-targeted towards SAR but was meant to obtain a representative sample of the resident fish community. However, any SAR that were captured incidentally during this sampling event were recorded. In addition to the SAR fish listed in DFO critical habitat mapping, additional SAR information was provided by DFO directly through the Species at Risk Act (SARA) Permit Application process that was initiated in June 2017 for the study area. Based on information, Eastern Sand Darter and Northern Madtom have also been included in Table 1. TABLE 1 Fish SAR Listed to Potentially Occur in the Study Area Common Name Observed in or Surrounding the Study Area SRANK SARA (Federal) ESA (Provincial) Silver shiner Y S2S3 THR THR Black Redhorse Y S2 THR THR Northern Brook Lamprey Y S4 SC SC Pugnose Minnow Y S2 THR THR Spotted Sucker Y S3 SC SC Eastern Sand Darter Y S2 THR END Northern Madtom Y S1 END END Notes: END - Endangered SC - Special Concern NAR - Not at Risk THR - Threatened 24504-528 Fisheries Summary 2017-10-12 draft.docx 2 Matrix Solutions Inc.

W Easting (m) 475000 476000 477000 478000 479000 480000 473000 474000 475000 476000 477000 478000 479000 480000 4758000 4756000 4757000 4758000 4756000 I:\CH2MHill\24504\FiguresAndTables\HYD\2017\MappingMap\Figure-1_1-OneRiverStudyArea.mxd - Tabloid_L - 20-Jun-17, 07:47 AM - murtheil - TID004 4757000 Northing (m) 4759000 474000 4759000 473000 Legend One River Study Area Reach Break +!, Points of Interest Watercourse Water Body Highways/Arterial Roads Local Roads M3, M4... Reach Names CH2M Railway Study Area Extent 1:20,000 210 Reference: please refer to reference spreadsheet One River Master Plan Environmental Assessment metres 0 210 NAD 1983 UTM Zone 17N 420 Date: Jun 2017 Project: 24504-528 Submitter: A. McKay Reviewer: Disclaimer: The information contained herein may be compiled from numerous third party materials that are subject to periodic change without prior notification. While every effort has been made by Matrix Solutions Inc. to ensure the accuracy of the information presented at the time of publication, Matrix Solutions Inc. assumes no liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the third party material. Figure D. Van Vliet 1.1

2 METHODS 2.1 Target Sampling Areas Target areas were selected based on initial reconnaissance efforts where there are suitable sampling stations available based on accessibility, availability representative habitats suitable for a variety of species, and effective sampling based on the limitations of sampling gear. Based on the presence of fast moving currents and relatively high water levels, sampling stations were selected at various points of the study area where a mixture of moving waters (lotic habitat) and still waters (lentic habitat) exist. The sampling program targeted shallow riffles and backwater eddies along channel margins to ensure that fish communities were represented and could be captured by a combination of active and passive sampling methods The primary areas of interest include: Springbank Dam - 1 km upstream of the dam, just south of the Thames Valley Golf Club near the historic pedestrian bridge, containing remnants of a historic dam structure and containing riffles, glides, and gravel bars. The Forks Area - Confluence of the North and South Thames River. This area contains numerous shallow riffles, side channels, and depositional zones around the bridge piers, backwater areas, and gravel bars downstream of the confluence. South Thames Tributary- The South Thames Tributary contains many shallow flats where SAR minnow species were previously recorded. Additional areas of interest include sections of the river where significant habitat changes appear to have occurred based on review of areal imagery. These areas include: Downstream of Railway Bridge at Greenway Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) - 500 m section just upstream of the Greenway WWTP, downstream of the railway bridge crossing. Gravel bars and a mid-channel island have fully formed and re-vegetated as a result of the reduction in spring and summer water levels since 2005. This location was sampled in the initial field visit. Upstream of Wonderland Road- The river bend directly west of the Greenway Parking lot upstream of Wonderland Road South contains a broad shallow riffle and exposed gravel bar surrounded by small embayments. This location was more easily accessible, provides more microhabitat for fish, and was sampled during the second field visit. The target locations are shown in Appendix A. 2.2 Sampling Methods Sampling included active methods which involved the use of seine nets to actively capture fish in shallow riffle and flats areas, as well as umbrella nets to actively capture fish that are using specific areas of cover. Passive methods included the use of baited minnow traps set in areas frequented by fish, and recovered after a defined period of time. Due to the inherent sampling bias associated with the use of each sampling technique, both of these methods were used in the study area to obtain a good 24504-528 Fisheries Summary 2017-10-12 draft.docx 4 Matrix Solutions Inc.

representation of the fish community. The targeted fish community are small bodied resident fish species consisting of members of the minnow and perch families found mainly in moving waters, as well as members of the sunfish family that are oriented to cover. Based on previous experience in sampling, the current shallow river conditions in the Thames River allow for efficient deployment of a bag seine targeted at minnow species inhabiting shallow riffle areas. The stations selected for sampling consists of relatively shallow, wadeable riffle zones, with minimal areas of shoreline cover available. In areas where there were isolated areas of cover, minnow traps and umbrella nets were to sample cover oriented fish. The seine net used for the project consisted of a 30 bag seine with ¼ mesh to sample wadeable riffles and flats. Each haul was approximately 40 m in duration and approximately 10 to 15 seine hauls were completed at each site. Due to high flow velocities encountered in some areas, there was great difficulty in pulling the seine through some areas, resulting in inefficiencies, and in some areas, obstruction from large boulders and rocks resulted in failure of seine attempts. In all sampling sites where there were still waters, approximately 6 to 7 baited minnow traps were placed in pools available near the shoreline and were left in place for approximately 3 to 4 hours. In areas where there was submerged vegetation present, umbrella nets were used sparingly to sample within areas of cover, using kicking techniques to temporarily disturb the overlying vegetation and woody debris. Standard galvanized wire ¼ mesh minnow traps with 16'5" (42 cm) torpedo design with 21" (53.3 cm) openings were used in shoreline habitat and a 3 X 3 square ¼ mesh umbrella net was used sparingly in areas of submerged vegetation cover. After fish were captured, fish were transferred in Rubbermaid bins and processed. All fish with well-defined identification makings or morphometric characteristics were photographed and enumerated and released unharmed back to the river as much as possible. For fish that require further examination for positive identification, photographs were taken and a small number of voucher specimens were retained in preservative solution for further analysis. No large specimens were kept and only smaller individual specimens were kept. Only fish that were difficult to positively identify in the field were preserved as voucher specimens for further analysis. Photographs of the sampling methods and fish identifications are provided in Appendix B. 3 RESULTS 3.1 Late Spring Sampling The initial fish sampling event in June resulted in the capture of 896 fish, comprised of 14 species captured at four Thames River locations. The fish captured were dominated by members of the minnow family, with the relative abundance consisting of Common Shiner (62%), Rosyface Shiner (16%), Emerald Shiner (10%), Bluntnose Minnow (5%), and Spotfin Shiner (2%). One non-minnow species, the Rock Bass (2%) was captured using the umbrella net within specific areas. The prevalence of minnows in the samples was likely due to the use the seining method, which tends to sample schooling fish that prefer areas of open water, as opposed to those that are cover oriented. 24504-528 Fisheries Summary 2017-10-12 draft.docx 5 Matrix Solutions Inc.

Of interest was the capture of Silver Shiner, a threatened species, which was found in the Springbank Dam location and at the Forks location. This finding was notable as the most current Thames River SARA distribution mapping does not currently show the range of these species in the reaches upstream of Springbank Dam, suggesting that fish distribution has extended due to habitat changes becoming more suitable for this species. No other SAR fish were captured during the sampling, although field sampling efforts were primarily geared towards the capture of minnow species, which are found in schools within riffle and flats areas. Greenside Darter adults and juveniles were captured in all stations in the main stem of the Thames River, but this species has been removed from the SAR list (where it was listed as special concern) and is now considered not at risk. The only game fish species that were captured are Smallmouth Bass and Black Crappie. Common Carp, an introduced coarse fish that has since been naturalized in the Thames River was visually observed in the Forks area, but no juveniles of this species were captured. Anglers encountered along the Forks area and at the Springbank Dam Station reported captures of Longnose Gar and Northern Pike respectively, although no fish were observed. Adult Smallmouth Bass were visually observed spawning in the Forks area in the shallower areas near the bridge abutments, while juveniles were observed using the side channels near the bridge. 3.2 Late Summer Sampling The second fish sampling event in early September resulted in the capture of 1,154 fish, comprised of 15 species captured at four Thames River locations. The increased number of fish captured in the September event was likely due to increased sampling efficiency in terms of seining effort, as a result of greater familiarity with the sampling locations, sampling technique, and general knowledge of fish distribution relative to habitat. The change in sampling location at the wastewater treatment site station, from the section just upstream of the Greenway WWTP to the river bend directly west of the Greenway Parking lot upstream of Wonderland Road South, has also led to a dramatic increase in the number of captures, due to the availability of more suitable habitat at this location. Despite the increased abundance of fish, the relative abundance representation of fish captured was fairly similar to the June sampling event, with minnow species such as Common Shiner (31%), Rosyface Shiner (26%), Silver Shiner (24%), Spotfin Shiner (4%), and Bluntnose Minnow (3%) well represented within samples. Smallmouth Bass (2%) was the only game fish species represented within the samples. Among the few other notable changes in species representation was the increased capture of Silver Shiner in all of the stations, with the Forks area exhibiting the most numbers of individuals. 24504-528 Fisheries Summary 2017-10-12 draft.docx 6 Matrix Solutions Inc.

TABLE 2 Fisheries Inventory Summary (June 6 and 7, 2017) Common Name Scientific Name Sample Locations Species Relative Springbank Wastewater South Thames The Forks Totals Abundance Dam Treatment Plant Branch Black Crappie Pomoxis nigromaculatus 0 0 2 0 2 0.2 Blackside Darter Percina maculata 0 0 0 0 0 - Bluntnose Minnow Pimephales notatus 8 3 24 7 42 4.7 Central Stoneroller Campostoma anomalum 0 0 0 0 0 - Common Carp* Cyprinus carpio 0 0 1 0 1 0.1 Common Shiner Luxilus cornutus 27 11 489 25 552 61.6 Emerald Shiner Notropis atherinoides 59 13 14 3 89 9.9 Greater Redhorse Moxostoma valenciennesi 0 1 0 0 1 0.1 Greenside Darter Etheostoma blennioides 1 1 1 0 3 0.3 Hognose Sucker Hypentelium nigricans 0 0 0 0 0 - Least Darter Etheostoma microperca 0 0 2 0 2 0.2 Redhorse Species* Moxostoma spp. 0 0 0 2 2 0.2 Rock Bass Ambloplites rupestris 1 0 15 4 20 2.2 Rosyface Shiner Notropis rubellus 66 15 47 11 139 15.5 Shorthead Redhorse Moxostoma macrolepidotum 0 0 0 0 0 - Silver Shiner Notropis photogenis 15 0 2 0 17 1.9 Smallmouth Bass Microterus dolomieu 0 0 5 0 5 0.6 Spotfin Shiner Cyprinella spiloptera 15 5 0 1 21 2.3 Total Number of Fish Captured 192 49 602 53 896 - * Visually observed species 24504-528 Fisheries Summary 2017-10-12 draft.docx 7 Matrix Solutions Inc.

TABLE 3 Fisheries Inventory Summary (September 6 and 7, 2017) Common Name Scientific Name Springbank Dam Greenway Park Locations The Forks South Thames Branch Species Totals Relative Abundance Black Crappie Pomoxis nigromaculatus 0 0 0 0 0 - Blackside Darter Percina maculata 5 0 0 0 5 0.4 Bluntnose Minnow Pimephales notatus 20 0 16 0 36 3.1 Central Stoneroller Campostoma anomalum 0 0 1 0 1 0.1 Common Carp* Cyprinus carpio 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 Common Shiner Luxilus cornutus 51 6 289 6 352 30.7 Emerald Shiner Notropis atherinoides 37 20 4 20 81 7.1 Greater Redhorse Moxostoma valenciennesi 1 0 0 0 1 0.1 Greenside Darter Etheostoma blennioides 16 1 1 1 19 1.7 Hognose Sucker Hypentelium nigricans 10 0 2 0 12 1.0 Least Darter Etheostoma microperca 0 0 0 0 0 - Redhorse Species Moxostoma spp. 0 1 0 1 2 0.2 Rock Bass Ambloplites rupestris 0 0 0 0 0 - Rosyface Shiner Notropis rubellus 15 116 50 116 297 25.9 Shorthead Redhorse Moxostoma macrolepidotum 1 0 0 0 1 0.1 Silver Shiner Notropis photogenis 57 51 116 51 275 24.0 Smallmouth Bass Microterus dolomieu 18 2 1 2 23 2.0 Spotfin Shiner Cyprinella spiloptera 3 5 28 5 41 3.6 Total Number of Fish Captured 234 202 508 202 1146-24504-528 Fisheries Summary 2017-10-12 draft.docx 8 Matrix Solutions Inc.

3.3 Sample Summary Comparison Based on sampling efforts in both June and September, the Springbank Dam site and the Forks location yielded the majority of fish captured. The presence of broad areas of shallow riffles at both locations were inhabited by large schools of minnows and sampling within a small side channel in the Forks location was very effective in the capture of large numbers of fish, including juvenile Smallmouth Bass. Mature individuals of Common Shiner, Emerald Shiner, and Silver Shiner were captured mostly in the flats just upstream of the large riffle zone in the Springbank Dam station. This latter location was deeper and schools of minnows were often observed feeding on insects emerging from the water surface. In contrast, many smaller minnow specimens were found in shallow riffles both upstream and downstream of the exposed gravels downstream of the Kensington Bridge and east of the confluence of South Thames River. Compared to other stations, the Wastewater Treatment Plant and the South Thames River Locations yielded smaller numbers of fish. These sites appear to be less productive likely due to reduced habitat complexity within the exposed channel. These habitats contained finer, more embedded substrates in comparison to the many areas of exposed gravels, side channels, and other microhabitat found in other station locations. Most of the fish captured were from the seining method. No fish were captured using the minnow traps. The umbrella net was effective in capturing some species of fish that were not easily captured by seining. These included fish such as Black Crappie, Rock Bass, and a Greenside Darter, which tended to be cover oriented, rather than open water schooling oriented fish (i.e., members of the minnow family). 4 SUMMARY A field assessment was completed on June 6 and 7, 2017 and again in September 6 and 7, 2017 to sample the representative fish community within the One River Study area. Based on this sampling event, a large number of fish, dominated by members of the minnow family were caught at both the Springbank Dam and Forks locations, indicating productive fish habitat at these locations. The Springbank Dam location is notable as this location was previously backwatered and has now transformed into fast flowing waters with the non-operation of Springbank Dam. The finding of Silver Shiner at this location indicates that their range has increased, as habitat became more suitable from changes that have occurred during the non-operation of the dam. As Silver Shiner is a SAR listed species, this finding suggests that this new habitat is being colonized by SAR, which is likely to become better in the future as habitat continues to improve upstream of the dam influenced area. The fish data collected during both sampling events will be assembled in relation to the aquatic habitat mapping (currently planned for the fall of 2017) at the surveyed sampling stations to provide an indication of fish habitat use. The information collected through this aquatic habitat mapping program, along with the geomorphology assessment that is being completed concurrently, will be used to supplement the Background Environmental Data Report prepared by Matrix in June 2017. 24504-528 Fisheries Summary 2017-10-12 draft.docx 9 Matrix Solutions Inc.

5 REFERENCES Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). 2016. Distribution of Fish Species at Risk. Maps. Upper Thames River Conservation Authority. May 2016. Matrix Solutions Inc. (Matrix). 2017. One River Master Plan Background Environmental Data Report, City of London, Thames River. Report prepared for CH2M Hill Canada Limited and City of London. Guelph, Ontario. June 2017. 24504-528 Fisheries Summary 2017-10-12 draft.docx 10 Matrix Solutions Inc.

APPENDIX A Study Area Maps

City of London Map Notes The Forks Target Sample Locations South Thames Branch Target Sample Location 0.2 NAD_1983_UTM_Zone_17N City of London 0 0.10 0.2 Kilometers This map is a user generated static output from city of london site and is for reference only. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION 1: 3,999

City of London Map Notes WWTP Target Sample Location Greenway Park Target Sample Location 0.2 NAD_1983_UTM_Zone_17N City of London 0 0.10 0.2 Kilometers This map is a user generated static output from city of london site and is for reference only. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION 1: 3,999

City of London Map Notes Springbank Dam/ Old Pumphouse Target Sample Location 0.2 NAD_1983_UTM_Zone_17N City of London 0 0.10 0.2 Kilometers This map is a user generated static output from city of london site and is for reference only. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION 1: 3,999

APPENDIX B Site Photographs

- THAMES RIVER ONE RIVER MASTER PLAN EA APPENDIX B 2017 FISHERIES SAMPLING SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Matrix Solutions Inc. June 6, 2017 1. Springbank Dam Station - Seining in shallow riffle zones Matrix Solutions Inc. June 7, 2017 2. South Thames Tributary - Seining in shallow riffle zones Appendix B - Site Photographs.docx B-1 Matrix Solutions Inc.

- THAMES RIVER ONE RIVER MASTER PLAN EA APPENDIX B 2017 FISHERIES SAMPLING SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Matrix Solutions Inc. June 6, 2017 3. Springbank Dam Station: Setting minnow traps Matrix Solutions Inc. June 6, 2017 4. Springbank Dam Station: Seining in flats Appendix B - Site Photographs.docx B-2 Matrix Solutions Inc.

- THAMES RIVER ONE RIVER MASTER PLAN EA APPENDIX B 2017 FISHERIES SAMPLING SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Matrix Solutions Inc. June 7, 2017 5. The Forks Area: Processing captured fish and recording data Matrix Solutions Inc. June 7, 2017 6. The Forks Area: Net showing minnows for identification Appendix B - Site Photographs.docx B-3 Matrix Solutions Inc.

- THAMES RIVER ONE RIVER MASTER PLAN EA APPENDIX B 2017 FISHERIES SAMPLING SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Matrix Solutions Inc. June 7, 2017 7. The Forks Area: Identified Black Crappie 8. The Forks Area: Identified Spotfin Shiner (left) and Small-mouth Bass (right) Appendix B - Site Photographs.docx B-4 Matrix Solutions Inc.

- THAMES RIVER ONE RIVER MASTER PLAN EA APPENDIX B 2017 FISHERIES SAMPLING SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Matrix Solutions Inc. June 7, 2017 9. The Forks Area: Seining in side channel downstream of Kensington Bridge Matrix Solutions Inc. June 7, 2017 10. The Forks Area: Example of side channel habitat Appendix B - Site Photographs.docx B-5 Matrix Solutions Inc.