Bike/Multipurpose Trail Study for Glynn County, Georgia MAY 16, 2016

Similar documents
MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Bicycle-Pedestrian Master Plan Update

Rhode Island Moving Forward Long-Range Transportation Plan 2040 Municipal Roundtable Newport County

Welcome to Laredo Metropolitan Transportation Plan First Public Meeting. February 27 th, :30 PM to 7:30 PM. We value your opinion!

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

5. Pedestrian System. Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years

Linking Transportation and Health in Nashville & Middle Tennessee

NOTES FROM JUNIOR COUNCIL ORIENTATION SESSION HELD ON MONDAY, JANUARY 22, 2018, AT 3:30 PM IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

Providing an Efficient and Multi-modal Transportation System

City of Hamilton s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) Public Consultation 3 December 2015

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Vision

The City of Newark Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety

Goal 3: Foster an environment of partnerships and collaboration to connect our communities and regions to one another.

Arlington s Master Transportation Plan

Developing a Regional Complete Streets Policy Statement for North Central Texas. Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee August 17, 2011

Downtown Naples Mobility and Connectivity Study. Naples City Council Presentation January 2017

2015 Florida Main Street Annual Conference. Complete Streets Equal Stronger Main Streets

Bicycle and Pedestrian Chapter TPP Update Overview. TAB September 20, 2017

Washington County, Oregon

Bicycle-Pedestrian Master Plan: Chapters 3 and 4 Distribution

Regional Bicycle Barriers Study

Incorporating Health in Regional Transportation Planning

Bicycle and Pedestrian

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

WILMAPCO Public Opinion Survey Summary of Results

City of Jacksonville Mobility Fee Update

San Mateo County Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Open House

Stakeholder Update. Agenda. Project update Needs Identification Strategy Proposed needs Safety Collectors/Arterials Greenways Local roads

Vision Public Workshop: Findings

Performance Criteria for 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

Living Streets Policy

Goodlettsville Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Executive Summary

The Pedestrian Safety Action Plan

Route 7 Corridor Study

Toward Zero Deaths. Regional SHSP Road Show Meeting. Virginia Strategic Highway Safety Plan. presented by

Rhode Island Moving Forward Long-Range Transportation Plan 2040 Municipal Roundtable Providence County

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Incorporating Health in Regional Transportation Planning

Plant City Walk-Bike Plan

Categorizing Cyclists: What Do We Know? Insights from Portland, OR

Community Task Force March 14, 2018

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

Cecil County, Maryland. Bicycle Master Plan

2014 Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Study Evaluation Tools Leslie A. Meehan, AICP MPO Technical Coordinating Committee Meeting April 1, 2015

General Plan Circulation Element Update Scoping Meeting April 16, 2014 Santa Ana Senior Center, 424 W. 3rd Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701

Pocatello Regional Transit Master Transit Plan Draft Recommendations

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

We believe the following comments and suggestions can help the department meet those goals.

WELCOME! To the Centennial Neighbourhoods Secondary Plan and Transportation Management Plan Information Centre. City of Hamilton

MnDOT Implementation of Complete Streets Policy. January 2014

Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning in a Historically Car-Centric Culture: A Focus on Connectivity, Safety, & Accessibility

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Climate Change Action Plan: Transportation Sector Discussion Paper: Cycling

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

Speed Limits Study and Proposal. Public Input Session: 8/14/13

12 RECOMMENDATIONS Road Improvements. Short Term (generally the next five years)

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

IOWA HIGHWAY 58 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT STUDY PROJECT UPDATE NO. 1 OCTOBER 17, 2013

Twin Cities Regional Bicycle System Study

City of Ottawa s Complete Streets Approach to Transportation Projects

Welcome. Background. Goals. Vision

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Transportation 2040 Update: Eudora Public Input As of June 1, 2017

POLICY STATEMENT: VISION ZERO

Welcome. Public Meeting. Heading 1. Heading 2. DeMers Ave. Columbia Rd. Washington St. 42nd St. 32nd Ave. Heading 3 HEADING

Basalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations

Governor s Transportation Vision Panel

Bellevue Downtown Association Downtown Bike Series

Rio Mills Rd/Berkmar Dr Extended Connection

Stakeholder Communication and Public Involvement Plan

Regional Bicycle System Master Study. Preliminary Results Update

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION/NONMOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION

Small Town & Rural Multimodal Networks

DRAFT MOVING FORWARD RHODE ISLAND BICYCLE MOBILITY PLAN 2018 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY IN ASSOCIATION WITH


El Paso County 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan

BID Strategy Group and Stakeholders Meeting. April 17, 2018

Sustainable Transportation Initiatives and Plans in Caledon

APPROVE A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

STUDY ADVISORY COMMITTEE. October 8, 2015

Rochester Downtown Bicycle Study 2009

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

Attachment A: Columbus Area Metropolitan Transportation Plan Objectives, Performance Measures, and Targets

Off-road Trails. Guidance

Creating Complete Streets to Accommodate All Users

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

Physical Implications of Complete Streets Policies

Transcription:

Bike/Multipurpose Trail Study for Glynn County, Georgia MAY 16, 2016

Agenda» Project Status Update» Draft Recommendations Overview» Next Steps» Questions/Discussion

Project Overview» Comprehensive Bikeway Multipurpose Trail Plan Identify current and future needs Identify deficiencies and provide concept level geometric improvements Develop planning level cost estimates Integrate analysis with 2040 MTP Study area includes Glynn County, City of Brunswick and Jekyll Island State Park

Study Process and Status Update Identify Existing Conditions Define User Groups and Multimodal Needs Coordinate with Local, State and Regional Agencies/Advocacy Groups Finalize Recommendations Present Draft Recommendations to BATS MPO Identify Trail and Bicycle Projects and Develop Cost Estimates

Status Update Complete Existing Conditions Analysis Ground truthing mapped data Identify Gaps in Non-Motorized Network Meet with local stakeholders Develop Project List Alignments Planning Level Cost Estimates» Present Draft Study Findings to MPO» Ongoing Coordination

Analysis Factors» Population and employment densities» Socioeconomic conditions» High bicycle and pedestrian crash locations» Existing travel behaviors» Public input» Existing infrastructure» Planned local, state and regional projects» Access to public facilities and recreational destinations» Economic development strategies (e.g. Tourism)» Safe routes to schools» Future transportation investments» Preservation/Conservation» Multimodal connectivity

Public Participation Recap 2040 MTP Online Survey Results If you rarely bike or walk, please choose the option(s) that best describe your reason(s). Travel time 13% Lack of facilities 19% Safety/security 20% Lack of connections 10% If more/improved facilities were available, would you walk or bike more frequently? Climate 3% Distance of trip 35% 16% Yes No 31% 53% Don't Know

Public Participation Recap 2040 MTP Online Survey Results Indicate your opinions on the following statements regarding the area's transportation system. Freight-based industry is important to our community Development patterns directly affect transportation Transit services (public transportation) should be developed Need more focus on safe bike/pedestrian access to schools More bicycle/pedestrian facilities are needed More travel options are needed Traffic congestion is a major problem 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree / Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree

DEFINE USER GROUPS AND THEIR NEEDS User Groups Adults and Children Persons with disabilities Persons without access to a motor vehicle Alternative transportation choice users Recreational users Other Where are they beginning their trip? Where are they trying to go? What is needed to assist in this trip?

Typical Facility Sections Typical Section - Minor Trail Typical Section - Major Trail

Typical Facility Sections Typical Section Two-Lane Roadway Typical Section Four-Lane Roadway

Non-Standard Facility Recommendations Will utilized industry standard sources for Non-standard bicycle and pedestrian crossing projects. FHWA Crossing Facility Details

ANALYZING PRIMARY USER GROUPS Zone 1: Rural, residential Zone 2: Rural, suburban residential, industrial Zone 3: Industrial, tourism, coastal/conservation, island residential Zone 4: Suburban residential, airport, recreation, institutional Zone 5: Urban residential, commercial/retail, education/university, industrial, recreation, disadvantaged populations Zone 6: Tourism, coastal/conservation, island residential, commercial/retail, airport

DEFINE USER GROUPS

DEFINE USER GROUPS

DEFINE USER GROUPS

DEFINE USER GROUPS

DEFINE USER GROUPS

DEFINE USER GROUPS

DEFINE USER GROUPS

Next Steps» Receive and incorporate comments through June 13 th.» Present final recommendations at June BATS meeting for adoption.

Questions?