RED SEA URCHIN BRITISH COLUMBIA. Strongylocentrotus franciscanus. Sometimes known as Uni, Urchin Roe SUMMARY

Similar documents
CERO MACKEREL. Scomberomorous regalis. Sometimes known as Painted Mackerel, Saba SUMMARY

Sometimes known as Ocean Shrimp, Oregon Shrimp, Pacific Pink Shrimp

MARKET SQUID. Loligo opalescens. Sometimes known as Opal Squid, Ika SUMMARY

BLACK SEA BASS. Centropristis striata. Sometimes known as Black Bass, Black Perch, Tailywag SUMMARY

Sometimes known as Allmouth, Anglerfish, Goosefish, Molligut, Anko, Ankimo

STURGEON - CASPIAN SEA

HADDOCK. Melanogrammus aeglefinus. Sometimes known as Scrod, Snapper Haddock SUMMARY

COMMON DAB ICELAND. Limanda limanda. Sometimes known as Dab, Sand Dab SUMMARY

Sometimes known as Bug, Common Spiny Lobster, Crayfish, Florida Lobster, Rock Lobster

Lepidopsetta bilineata (Southern Rock Sole), Lepidopsetta polyxystra (Northern Rock Sole)

Sometimes known as Golden Redfish, Rosefish, Redfish, and Large Redfish

YELLOWTAIL FLOUNDER. Limanda ferruginea. Sometimes known as Yellowtail, Sand Dab SUMMARY

SWORDFISH ATLANTIC OCEAN. Xiphias gladius. Sometimes known as Broadbill, Espada, Emperado, Shutome SUMMARY

The Common Wild Capture Fishery Methodology 1

Seafood Watch Seafood Report

SUMMER FLOUNDER. Paralichthys dentatus. Sometimes known as Flounder, Fluke SUMMARY

Yellowfin Tuna, Indian Ocean, Troll/ pole and line

Michael Tehan, Assistant Regional Administrator, Interior Columbia Basin Office

Tuna [211] 86587_p211_220.indd 86587_p211_220.indd /30/04 12/30/04 4:53:37 4:53:37 PM PM

Albacore Tuna, Bigeye Tuna, Skipjack Tuna, Swordfish, Yellowfin Tuna. Image Monterey Bay Aquarium. Hawaii Longline

CHUM SALMON - BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA. Oncorhynchus keta. Sometimes known as Dog Salmon, Calico Salmon SUMMARY

What are the threats to the oceans? Consequences. Four examples. Tuna

California s Marine Environment. Highly Variable Narrow Continental Shelf Upwelling and El Nino

Exhibit E Recreational Abalone Fishery Management

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Red Drum

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUMMARY OF COUGAR POPULATION MODEL AND EFFECTS OF LETHAL CONTROL

Albacore tuna, Bigeye tuna, Blackfin tuna, Skipjack tuna, Yellowfin tuna. Image Monterey Bay Aquarium. Atlantic. Purse Seine.

Sustainable Recreational Fishing Student Activity Workbook 6.2. Sustainable Recreational Fishing

Advice June 2014

Fish Conservation and Management

Urchin (Canada Atlantic)

Spurdog (Squalus acanthias) in the Northeast Atlantic

Progress Made by Tuna Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs)

CHUM SALMON - WASHINGTON STATE. Oncorhynchus keta. Sometimes known as Dog Salmon, Calico Salmon SUMMARY

Northeast Atlantic Mackerel, Handlines

EUROPEAN PLAICE ICELAND, BOTTOM LONGLINE CAUGHT. Pleuronectes platessa. Sometimes known as Plaice SUMMARY

Food Chain. Marine Food Webs and Fisheries

Advice June 2012

HOW CAN WE HELP TO SUSTAIN AQUATIC BIODIVERSITY?

STOCK STATUS OF SOUTHERN BLUEFIN TUNA

Sometimes known as: Bass, capemouth, common bass, European bass, king of the mullets, sea bass, sea dace, sea perch, white mullet, white salmon

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Atlantic Menhaden

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Red Drum

Advice October 2013

Albacore tuna, Bigeye tuna, Swordfish, Yellowfin tuna. Image Monterey Bay Aquarium. Atlantic. Longline. December 8, 2014

Dauphin Lake Fishery. Status of Walleye Stocks and Conservation Measures

9.4.5 Advice September Widely distributed and migratory stocks Herring in the Northeast Atlantic (Norwegian spring-spawning herring)

Glossary. Action point or trigger point or level

Submission on summary of the Draft Convention on Biological Diversity National Report

Eastern and South Shore Nova Scotia Lobster LFAs The Fishery. DFO Atlantic Fisheries Stock Status Report 96/117E.

Species Profile: Red Drum Benchmark Assessment Finds Resource Relatively Stable with Overfishing Not Occurring

SMOOTH HAMMERHEAD SHARK (HHS)

PACIFIC BLUEFIN TUNA STOCK ASSESSMENT

Oceans Humans both depend on it and threaten it with their activities

Purple Sea Urchin Barrens

By far the majority of New Zealand s fisheries are performing well

ASSESSMENT OF HERRING IN THE SOUTHERN GULF OF ST. LAWRENCE (NAFO DIV. 4T)

Recommendations to the 25 th Regular Meeting of the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT)

STATUS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MARINE FISHERY RESOURCES 2014

Agenda Item Summary BACKGROUND. Public Involvement ISSUE ANALYSIS. Attachment 1

Fisheries Myths. Ray Hilborn School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington

By far the majority of New Zealand s fisheries are performing well

Certification Determination. Louisiana Blue Crab Commercial Fishery

West Coast Rock Lobster. Description of sector. History of the fishery: Catch history

FISHERY ASSESSMENT REPORT

Southern Gulf of St. Lawrence (4T) Herring

ASSESSMENT OF SHRIMP STOCKS IN THE ESTUARY AND GULF OF ST. LAWRENCE IN 2011

Comparison of EU and US Fishery management Systems Ernesto Penas Principal Adviser DG Mare

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Black Drum

Assessment Summary Report Gulf of Mexico Red Snapper SEDAR 7

IOTC 2015 SC18 ES06[E]

Fishing mortality in relation to highest yield. Fishing mortality in relation to agreed target

Update: This document has been updated to include biological information on red snapper and information from the recent Gulf of Mexico Fishery

Year Avg. TAC Can Others Totals

Highly Migratory Species SWFSC/NMFS Report

Advice October 2012

Agenda Item F.1.b Supplemental Public Comment 2 June 2018

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: American Lobster

Tuna Dolphin Controversy

Paper prepared by the Secretariat

Threats to Biodiversity/Sustainability

Advice October 2014

Annual Pink Shrimp Review

Groundfish Science Report

3.4.3 Advice June Barents Sea and Norwegian Sea Cod in Subareas I and II (Norwegian coastal waters cod)

North and South Atlantic Handline, Harpoons

Seafood Watch Standard for Fisheries

Hatcheries: Role in Restoration and Enhancement of Salmon Populations

Chesapeake Bay Jurisdictions White Paper on Draft Addendum IV for the Striped Bass Fishery Management Plan

Worldwide Office 4245 North Fairfax Drive, Suite 100 Arlington, VA 22203

ASSESSMENT OF THE WEST COAST OF NEWFOUNDLAND (DIVISION 4R) HERRING STOCKS IN 2011

8.9 SWO-ATL ATLANTIC SWORDFISH

Current Status and Future. Hudson River American shad stock. New York State Dept. of Environmental Conservation

Seafood Watch Standard for Fisheries

ATLANTIC SALMON NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR, SALMON FISHING AREAS 1-14B. The Fisheries. Newfoundland Region Stock Status Report D2-01

To Fish or Not to Fish? A role-playing activity based on the Marine Reserves process at the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary

GUIDE TO ESTIMATING TOTAL ALLOWABLE CATCH USING SIZE FREQUENCY IN CATCH, EFFORT DATA, AND MPAS

Agenda Item Summary BACKGROUND. Attachment 1

A REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF NATURAL MORTALITY FOR THE ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF YELLOWFIN TUNA IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN

Coastal Pelagic Species

Transcription:

RED SEA URCHIN BRITISH COLUMBIA Strongylocentrotus franciscanus Sometimes known as Uni, Urchin Roe SUMMARY Red Sea Urchins, members of the phylum Echinodermata ( spiny skin ) are moderately abundant along the coasts of northeast Canada. Sea Urchins are prolific breeders and can live over 20 years. They are hand-caught by divers, so bycatch is minimal with no damage to the habitat. Sea Urchins graze on kelp (a type of seaweed) and are eaten by many animals like sea otters, and therefore are an important link in the marine ecosystem. Chef Barton Seaver describes them this way: They have a soft texture with an intense briny bite. They have a lingering ocean flavor that is quite potent. Criterion Points Final Score Color Life History 3.25 2.40-4.00 Abundance 2.25 1.60-2.39 Habitat Quality and Fishing Gear Impacts 4.00 0.00-1.59 Management 3.50 Bycatch 4.00 Final Score 3.40 Color

LIFE HISTORY Core Points (only one selection allowed) If a value for intrinsic rate of increase ( r ) is known, assign the score below based on this value. If no r-value is available, assign the score below for the correct age at 50% maturity for females if specified, or for the correct value of growth rate ('k'). If no estimates of r, age at 50% maturity, or k are available, assign the score below based on maximum age. 1.00 Intrinsic rate of increase <0.05; OR age at 50% maturity >10 years; OR growth rate <0.15; OR maximum age >30 years. 2.00 Intrinsic rate of increase = 0.05-0.15; OR age at 50% maturity = 5-10 years; OR a growth rate = 0.16 0.30; OR maximum age = 11-30 years. 3.00 Intrinsic rate of increase >0.16; OR age at 50% maturity = 1-5 years; OR growth rate >0.30; OR maximum age <11 years. The intrinsic rate of increase is unknown for Red Sea Urchin, however, model predictions suggest r = 0.35 (Ramirez-Felix and Manzo-Monroy, 2000). The Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada states that Red Sea Urchins become sexually mature at around 2 years old when the test reaches 50 mm (2 inches) diameter (DFO1, undated). Red Sea Urchins reach a maximum size of 190-200 mm test diameter (DFO1, undated). Growth rate is dependent on food supply. The only growth rate (k) found was 0.13 (Ebert et al., 1999). A recent study using radiocarbon analysis concludes that the maximum age of Red Sea Urchins varies throughout its range, from 50 years in southern California to over 100 years in Washington State and Alaska (Ebert and Southon, 2003). Points of Adjustment (multiple selections allowed) -0.25 Species has special behaviors that make it especially vulnerable to fishing pressure (e.g., spawning aggregations; site fidelity; segregation by sex; migratory bottlenecks; unusual attraction to gear; etc.). -0.25 Species has a strategy for sexual development that makes it especially vulnerable to fishing pressure (e.g., age at 50% maturity >20 years; sequential hermaphrodites; extremely low fecundity). -0.25 Species has a small or restricted range (e.g., endemism; numerous evolutionarily significant units; restricted to one coastline; e.g., American lobster; striped bass; endemic reef fishes). The Red Sea Urchin is restricted to the northeast Pacific coastline ranging from Alaska to Cedros Island, in Baja California, Mexico (Ebert et al., 1994).

-0.25 Species exhibits high natural population variability driven by broad-scale environmental change (e.g. El Nino; decadal oscillations). +0.25 Species does not have special behaviors that increase ease or population consequences of capture OR has special behaviors that make it less vulnerable to fishing pressure (e.g., species is widely dispersed during spawning). Red Sea Urchins are widely dispersed in shallow water along the northeast Pacific coast, and undergo multiple spawning events. Red Sea Urchins spawn synchronously with males releasing sperm first, which stimulates the females to release eggs. The abundance and distribution of males influences fertilization success (Levitan, 2002). Poor fertilization success occurs if there are less than 2 Urchins per square meter (CDFG, 2001). Fertilization success peaks at 1-3 male Urchins per square meter (Levitan, 2004), and in areas with slow water currents (Levitan et al., 1992). The larvae drift in the water current for 27-131 days (Rogers-Bennett, 2007) before settling a long way from where they were spawned, and often under adult Urchins. +0.25 Species has a strategy for sexual development that makes it especially resilient to fishing pressure (e.g., age at 50% maturity <1 year; extremely high fecundity). Red Sea Urchins are broadcast spawners. They have extremely high fecundity with females releasing several million eggs during a single spawning event (CDFG, 2001). In British Columbia, spawning mainly occurs between March and September (DFO2, undated). +0.25 Species is distributed over a very wide range (e.g., throughout an entire hemisphere or ocean basin; e.g., swordfish; tuna; Patagonian toothfish). +0.25 Species does not exhibit high natural population variability driven by broad-scale environmental change (e.g., El Nino; decadal oscillations). 3.25 Points for Life History

ABUNDANCE Core Points (only one selection allowed) Compared to natural or un-fished level, the species population is: 1.00 Low: Abundance or biomass is <75% of BMSY or similar proxy (e.g., spawning potential ratio). 2.00 Medium: Abundance or biomass is 75-125% of BMSY or similar proxy; OR population is approaching or recovering from an overfished condition; OR adequate information on abundance or biomass is not available. The Red Sea Urchin population in British Columbia is considered to be healthy due to a precautionary approach to management (DFO, 1999; DFO, 2007). 3.00 High: Abundance or biomass is >125% of BMSY or similar proxy. Points of Adjustment (multiple selections allowed) -0.25 The population is declining over a generational time scale (as indicated by biomass estimates or standardized CPUE). -0.25 Age, size or sex distribution is skewed relative to the natural condition (e.g., truncated size/age structure or anomalous sex distribution). -0.25 Species is listed as "overfished" OR species is listed as "depleted", "endangered", or "threatened" by recognized national or international bodies. The Red Sea Urchin is not considered to be overfished and is thought to be sustainable (DFO, 2007). Only 2% of the recruited population is harvested each year (DFO, 2001). -0.25 Current levels of abundance are likely to jeopardize the availability of food for other species or cause substantial change in the structure of the associated food web. +0.25 The population is increasing over a generational time scale (as indicated by biomass estimates or standardized CPUE). +0.25 Age, size or sex distribution is functionally normal. Age/size distribution data is not available, but since a low percentage of the population is being exploited (2% of the recruited population) (DFO, 2001), it is assumed that age, sex and size distribution is functionally normal. However, no points were added due to a lack of information.

+0.25 Species is close to virgin biomass. +0.25 Current levels of abundance provide adequate food for other predators or are not known to affect the structure of the associated food web. Current levels of Red Sea Urchins provide adequate food for their predators and the structure of the food web is not affected. Sea otters are a major predator of Red Sea Urchins and can reduce the population to a level where a fishery is no longer viable (DFO, 2007). Sea Urchins need to remain above a critical density level to maintain their optimal habitats. When their density falls below the critical level, their grazing rate is insufficient to control algae growth and their habitat will be lost or become one favored by their predators such as crabs (Chen 2008). Current levels of Sea Urchins in British Columbia are sufficient to prevent this 'habitat switch'. 2.25 Points for Abundance HABITAT QUALITY AND FISHING GEAR IMPACTS Core Points (only one selection allowed) Select the option that most accurately describes the effect of the fishing method upon the habitat that it affects 1.00 The fishing method causes great damage to physical and biogenic habitats (e.g., cyanide; blasting; bottom trawling; dredging). 2.00 The fishing method does moderate damage to physical and biogenic habitats (e.g., bottom gillnets; traps and pots; bottom longlines). 3.00 The fishing method does little damage to physical or biogenic habitats (e.g., hand picking; hand raking; hook and line; pelagic long lines; mid-water trawl or gillnet; purse seines). In the commercial fishery Red Sea Urchins are hand-picked off rocks by divers or by using an urchin rake, and are measured to confirm they are above legal size. Urchins are stored in brailer nets or mesh bags and lifted to the surface where they are tagged, stored and processed (ADFG, undated; ODFW, undated). This method does little damage to the physical environment.

Red Sea Urchins are harvested for their gonads referred to as roe or uni'. Most are packed and shipped to Japan, and the rest is used in sushi restaurants worldwide (ODFW, undated). The roe yield accounts for 5-15 % of the animal s body weight (DFO, 1999). Points of Adjustment (multiple selections allowed) -0.25 Habitat for this species is so compromised from non-fishery impacts that the ability of the habitat to support this species is substantially reduced (e.g., dams; pollution; coastal development). -0.25 Critical habitat areas (e.g., spawning areas) for this species are not protected by management using time/area closures, marine reserves, etc. -0.25 No efforts are being made to minimize damage from existing gear types OR new or modified gear is increasing habitat damage (e.g., fitting trawls with roller rigs or rockhopping gear; more robust gear for deep-sea fisheries). -0.25 If gear impacts are substantial, resilience of affected habitats is very slow (e.g., deep water corals; rocky bottoms). +0.25 Habitat for this species remains robust and viable and is capable of supporting this species. Shallow coastal areas (< 125m depth) are thought to be robust and capable of supporting this species. +0.25 Critical habitat areas (e.g., spawning areas) for this species are protected by management using time/area closures, marine reserves, etc. Red Sea Urchins spawn throughout their range. Time/area closures are set up in British Columbia to aid in recovery of the population, and to monitor environmental effects on Urchin populations without the influence of harvesting (DFO2, undated; DFO, 2001). +0.25 Gear innovations are being implemented over a majority of the fishing area to minimize damage from gear types OR no innovations necessary because gear effects are minimal. Gear effects on the habitat are minimal.

+0.25 If gear impacts are substantial, resilience of affected habitats is fast (e.g., mud or sandy bottoms) OR gear effects are minimal. Gear effects on the habitat are minimal. 4.00 Points for Habitat Quality and Fishing Gear Impacts MANAGEMENT Core Points (only one selection allowed) Select the option that most accurately describes the current management of the fisheries of this species. 1.00 Regulations are ineffective (e.g., illegal fishing or overfishing is occurring) OR the fishery is unregulated (i.e., no control rules are in effect). 2.00 Management measures are in place over a major portion over the species' range but implementation has not met conservation goals OR management measures are in place but have not been in place long enough to determine if they are likely to achieve conservation and sustainability goals. 3.00 Substantial management measures are in place over a large portion of the species range and have demonstrated success in achieving conservation and sustainability goals. In British Columbia the Red Sea Urchin fishery is managed by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO), with input from the Pacific Urchin Harvesters Association (PUHA). The Red Sea Urchin has two main fisheries in British Columbia and California, with smaller fisheries in Oregon, Washington State, and Alaska. The British Columbia fishery is divided into two regions: the south coast and the north coast (DFO, 2001). Fishing began off the southern coast, with the northern coast opening in 1984 (Muse, 1998). The commercial Red Sea Urchin fishery began in 1971 (DFO, 2001), but expanded in 1978 (Muse, 1998). The fishery operated under unlimited entry until 1991 when limited entry was introduced (Muse, 1998). Landings peaked at 12,700 tons in 1992, but have since declined to 4,886 tons in 2001 (DFO, 2001). Management measures include seasonal or all-year closures, harvesting districts, vessel licensing and regulations, limited number of permits issued to divers including individual

quota programs and compulsory logbooks, a Total Allowable Catch (TAC) fixed at 2% of estimated biomass, and dockside monitoring. There is a minimum legal test diameter of 90 mm to allow for 3-5 years of spawning before harvest (DFO, 2001). A coast-wide quota was set in 2001 at 4,885.9 tons of which 83% was allocated to northern British Columbia, and 17% to the southern region. Quotas were introduced in 1993 to stabilize the fishing industry (DFO, 2001). During the 2006-2007 fishing season 50% of the annual TAC was not harvested and only 66% of the licenses were used. This was blamed on bad weather, poor gonad quality and lower market demand in Japan due to competition from Russia (DFO, 2007). The 2007/2008 Red Sea Urchin Integrated Fisheries Management Plan states that there is no concern about the Red Sea Urchin stocks, and due to the precautionary approach to management, conservation goals are being met (DFO, 2007). As a result the British Columbia fishery is considered to be sustainable. Points of Adjustment (multiple selections allowed) -0.25 There is inadequate scientific monitoring of stock status, catch or fishing effort. -0.25 Management does not explicitly address fishery effects on habitat, food webs, and ecosystems. Sea Urchins have an important relationship with kelp and sea otters. Sea Urchins feed on kelp and are preyed upon by sea otters. If the majority of kelp diminishes the food web collapses. Urchins can reach low numbers if over-preyed upon by sea otters, and otter numbers can be reduced if the urchin is overfished. This food web relationship is known but not integrated into management plans. At present a commercial fishery does not exist where large numbers of otters are present (DFO, 2001; DFO, 2007). In addition, Sea Urchin density determines the amount or biomass of algae, and thus determines habitat type. The density parameter is not considered in the assessment and management of Sea Urchins. -0.25 This species is overfished and no recovery plan or an ineffective recovery plan is in place. -0.25 Management has failed to reduce excess capacity in this fishery or implements subsidies that result in excess capacity in this fishery.

+0.25 There is adequate scientific monitoring, analysis and interpretation of stock status, catch and fishing effort. Fishery managers monitor catch and the status of the Red Sea Urchin population. Stock assessments are made using surplus production models which have determined that 2% of the recruited Urchin biomass can be harvested each year. Biomass is calculated for each of 29 statistical districts off British Columbia (DFO, 2001). The Department of Fisheries and Oceans issues annual fishery updates and Integrated Fisheries Management Plans. Harvest log data is collected from divers' logbooks and dockside monitoring. Members of the fishery pay fees to conduct research through independent contractors which conduct surveys of fishing beds, fishing vessels and processing plants (DFO, 2001). +0.25 Management explicitly and effectively addresses fishery effects on habitat, food webs, and ecosystems. +0.25 This species is overfished and there is a recovery plan (including benchmarks, timetables and methods to evaluate success) in place that is showing signs of success OR recovery plan is not needed. No recovery plan is needed because the fishery is sustainable and not overfished. +0.25 Management has taken action to control excess capacity or reduce subsidies that result in excess capacity OR no measures are necessary because fishery is not overcapitalized. British Columbia has a limited entry Red Sea Urchin fishery with 110 issued licenses, and a coast-wide quota set at 4,885.6 tons. Individual quotas are calculated by dividing the total quota by the number of licenses in each region (DFO, 2001; DFO, 2007). Logbooks must be surrendered containing information on harvesting location, water depth, time spent diving, and number of Urchins harvested. 3.50 Points for Management

BYCATCH Core Points (only one selection allowed) Select the option that most accurately describes the current level of bycatch and the consequences that result from fishing this species. The term, "bycatch" used in this document excludes incidental catch of a species for which an adequate management framework exists. The terms, "endangered, threatened, or protected," used in this document refer to species status that is determined by national legislation such as the U.S. Endangered Species Act, the U.S. Marine Mammal Protection Act (or another nation's equivalent), the IUCN Red List, or a credible scientific body such as the American Fisheries Society. 1.00 Bycatch in this fishery is high (>100% of targeted landings), OR regularly includes a "threatened, endangered or protected species." 2.00 Bycatch in this fishery is moderate (10-99% of targeted landings) AND does not regularly include "threatened, endangered or protected species" OR level of bycatch is unknown. 3.00 Bycatch in this fishery is low (<10% of targeted landings) and does not regularly include "threatened, endangered or protected species." Bycatch is very low because the fishery is highly selective. Urchins are harvested by divers either via hand-picking or using urchin rakes. Some Urchins are destroyed while trying to remove them from the rocks, and others need to be broken open to check gonad quality. Without including breakage to check for gonad quality, breakage accounts for about 10% of what is harvested off British Columbia (Muse, 1998). As long as the Urchin is not damaged undersized individuals can be placed back on the rock and will survive. Points of Adjustment (multiple selections allowed) -0.25 Bycatch in this fishery is a contributing factor to the decline of "threatened, endangered, or protected species" and no effective measures are being taken to reduce it. -0.25 Bycatch of targeted or non-targeted species (e.g., undersize individuals) in this fishery is high and no measures are being taken to reduce it. -0.25 Bycatch of this species (e.g., undersize individuals) in other fisheries is high OR bycatch of this species in other fisheries inhibits its recovery, and no measures are being taken to reduce it. -0.25 The continued removal of the bycatch species contributes to its decline.

+0.25 Measures taken over a major portion of the species range have been shown to reduce bycatch of "threatened, endangered, or protected species" or bycatch rates are no longer deemed to affect the abundance of the "protected" bycatch species OR no measures needed because fishery is highly selective (e.g., harpoon; spear). No measures needed because the fishery is highly selective. Red Sea Urchins are harvested via hand-picking or using urchin rakes. +0.25 There is bycatch of targeted (e.g., undersize individuals) or non-targeted species in this fishery and measures (e.g., gear modifications) have been implemented that have been shown to reduce bycatch over a large portion of the species range OR no measures are needed because fishery is highly selective (e.g., harpoon; spear). No measures are needed because the fishery is highly selective. Urchins are measured once picked, and as long as they are not damaged the undersized individuals can be placed back on the rock and will survive. In British Columbia about 10% of individuals are lost due to breakage (Muse, 1998). +0.25 Bycatch of this species in other fisheries is low OR bycatch of this species in other fisheries inhibits its recovery, but effective measures are being taken to reduce it over a large portion of the range. Bycatch of Red Sea Urchins in other fisheries is generally low. However, studies have found that sea urchins in general suffer high mortality in fishing industries that use beam trawls (Kaiser and Spencer, 1995). +0.25 The continued removal of the bycatch species in the targeted fishery has had or will likely have little or no impact on populations of the bycatch species OR there are no significant bycatch concerns because the fishery is highly selective (e.g., harpoon; spear). There are no significant bycatch concerns because the fishery is highly selective. 4.00 Points for Bycatch

REFERENCES Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADFG). Undated. Sea urchin fisheries in Alaska. Available at: http://www.cf.adfg.state.ak.us/geninfo/shellfsh/seaurchin/seaurchinhome.php California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). 2001. Red Sea Urchin. In: California s Living Marine Resources: A status report. Available at: www.dfg.ca.gov/marine/status/red_sea_urchin. pdf Chen, Y. 2008. Personal communication. Ebert, T.A., S.C. Schroeter, J.D. Dixon, and P. Kalvass. 1994. Settlement patterns of red and purple sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus and S. purpuratus) in California, USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series 111: 41-52. Ebert, T.A., J.D. Dixon, S.C. Schroeter, P.E. Kalvass, N.T. Richmond, W.A. Bradbury, and D.A. Woodby. 1999. Growth and mortality of red sea urchins Strongylocentrotus franciscanus across a latitudinal gradient. Marine Ecology Progress Series 190: 189-209. Ebert, T.A. and J.R. Southon. 2003. Red sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus) can live over 100 years: confirmation with A-bomb 14carbon. Fishery Bulletin 101(4): 915-922. Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO1). Undated. Sea urchin biology. Available at: http://wwwops2.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/xnet/content/shellfish/sea_urchin/biology_urchin.htm Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO2). Undated. Commercial fishery notices: closures. Available at: http://www-ops2.pac.dfo- mpo.gc.ca/xnet/content/fns/index.cfm?pg=fishery_search&lang=en &ID=commercial Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). 1999. Discussion on a precautionary approach for management of the red sea urchin fishery in British Columbia. Research document 99/094. Available at: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas/csas/publications/resdocs- DocRech/1999/1999_ 094_e.htm Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). 2001. Red sea urchin. Stock status report C6-09. Available at: http://www-comm.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/publications/speciesbook/invertebrates/redurchin.html Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). 2007. Pacific Region Integrated Fisheries Management Plan, red sea urchin by dive, September 15, 2007 to July 31, 2008. Kaiser, M.J. and B.E. Spencer. 1995. Survival of by-catch from a beam trawl. Marine Ecology Progress Series 126: 31-38. Levitan, D.R. 2002. Density-dependent selection on gamete traits in three congeneric sea urchins. Ecology 83(2): 464-479.

Levitan, D.R. 2004. Density-dependent sexual selection in external fertilizers: variances in male and female fertilization success along the continuum from sperm limitation to sexual conflict in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus franciscanus. The American Naturalist 164(3): 298-309. Levitan, D.R., M.A. Sewell, and Chia, F-S. 1992. How distribution and abundance influence fertilization success in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus franciscanus. Ecology 73(1): 248-254. Muse, B. 1998. Management of the British Columbia sea urchin fisheries. Alaska Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission. CFEC 98-2N. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW). Undated. Sea urchins. Available at: http://www.dfw.state.or.us/mrp/shellfish/commercial/urchin.asp Ramirez-Felix Hector, E. and G. Manzo-Monroy. 2000. Evaluation of the use of two fishery access rights; concessions and permits, in a red sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus) fishery in Santo Tom s, Baja California, Mexico. IIFET 2000 Conference. Available at: http://oregonstate.edu/dept/iifet/2000/abstracts/ramirez-felix.html Rogers-Bennett, L. 2007. The ecology of Strongylocentrotus franciscanus and S. purpuratus In: Edible sea urchins: biology and ecology. Ed. J.M. Lawrence.