Left-Turn Lane Design NCHRP Project 3-102

Similar documents
Design Guidance for Intersection Auxiliary Lanes (NCHRP Project Report 780) September 13, 2016

Super 2: Recent Research in Energy Corridors

Yellow and Red Intervals It s Just a Matter of Time. 58 th Annual Alabama Transportation Conference February 9, 2015

Pedestrian Treatments by

2014 FHWA Aging Road User Handbook. Recommendations to Accommodate Aging Pedestrians. Lifesaver National Conference. What is the Handbook?

Chapter Twenty-eight SIGHT DISTANCE BUREAU OF LOCAL ROADS AND STREETS MANUAL

Design of Turn Lane Guidelines

Safety Impacts: Presentation Overview

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

Characteristics of Fatal Pedestrian Crashes on Freeways. Kay Fitzpatrick Texas A&M Transportation Institute

RE: 2007 NPA Text (Clean Version)

Roadway Design Manual

Transportation Advisory Board

Clear Zone Conflicts in AASHTO Publications

Technical Memorandum. Subject: Interchange Ramp Terminal Configuration. Expiration. Implementation. Introduction

KDOT Access Management Policy (AMP)

Turn Lane Warrants: Concepts, Standards, Application in Review

Issues Relating to the Geometric Design of Intersections Vergil G. Stover

TRAFFIC AND SAFETY NOTE 608A. Spacing for Commercial Drives and Streets. To Promote a Uniform Practice in Determining Access Spacing

By Kay Fitzpatrick, Ph.D., P.E., Ann Do, P.E., and Bruce Friedman, P.E.

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

Development of Guidelines for Driveway Location and Median Configuration in the Vicinity of Interchanges. Final Report March 2006

THE FUTURE OF THE TxDOT ROADWAY DESIGN MANUAL

IMPROVING PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AT UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS. Guidelines for Marked Crosswalks

Subject: Use of Pull-off Areas in Work Zones Page: 1 of 13. Brief Description: Guidance for the use and placement of pull-off area in work zones.

Who is Toole Design Group?

Geometric Design Strategic Research Program

CIRCLE DRIVE TRAFFIC AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT POLICY GUIDE. Management Principles and Implementation Concepts

Safety Assessment of Installing Traffic Signals at High-Speed Expressway Intersections

Safety Implications of Managed Lane Cross Sectional Elements (Buffer Width vs. Shoulder Width vs. Lane Width)

TRB/AASHTO Geometric Design Research Efforts Supplemental Information

7 DESIGN CRITER RIA 7.1 Design Space Requirements

GUIDELINES FOR USING DECISION SIGHT DISTANCE AT IGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS NEAR VERTICAL CURVES

Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections

Markings Technical Committee Chapter 3H: Roundabout Markings APPROVED IN NCUTCD COUNCIL ON JANUARY 20, 2006

The 2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) (Brief) Highlights for Arizona Practitioners. Arizona Department of Transportation

General References Definitions. (1) Design Guidance. (2) Supporting Information

A Traffic Operations Method for Assessing Automobile and Bicycle Shared Roadways

Roundabout Design Aid PREPARED BY TRAFFIC AND SAFETY

Figure 1: Vicinity Map of the Study Area

FDOT Bicycle/Pedestrian Focused Initiative & Complete Streets

2018 AASHTO BIKE GUIDE

September 2008 REVISIONS (1) SYMMETRICAL VERTICAL CURVE EQUATIONS 12.5(12) VERTICAL CURVE COMPUTATIONS 12.5(14) TURNING LANE LENGTHS 15.

Practical Application of Turn Lane Design Criteria in Developing Suburban & Urban Corridors

COMPLETE STREETS DESIGN STATE OF THE PRACTICE

Speed Management Techniques for Collectors and Arterials

How Might Connected Vehicles and Autonomous Vehicles Influence Geometric Design? October 10, 2017

POWELL BUTTE HIGHWAY/NEFF ROAD INTERSECTION Interim Report: Existing Conditions, Needs, and Alternatives Review

Form DOT F (8-72) Technical Report Documentation Page. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-11/

Safety of U-turns at Unsignalized Median Openings

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Safety and Operations Guidance for Using Timeof-Day Protected-Permissive Left-Turn Phasing Using Flashing Yellow Arrows

Multimodal Design Guidance. October 23, 2018 ITE Fall Meeting

Geometric Design, Speed, and Safety

Driver Yielding at Midblock Crossings Based on Roadway, Traffic, and Crosswalk Characteristics

Figure 1: Graphical definitions of superelevation in terms for a two lane roadway.

FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide

Edge Wedge 150 lb/ft 3

Technical Summary Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections

Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety at Alternative Intersections and Interchanges

PEDESTRIAN CROSSING STATISTICS

2018 AASHTO BIKE GUIDE

Abstract. Background. protected/permissive operation. Source: Google Streetview, Fairview/Orchard intersection

An Overview of the 2009 MUTCD

Using SHRP 2 s NDS Video Data to Evaluate the Impact of Offset Left-Turn Lanes on Gap Acceptance Behavior Karin M. Bauer & Jessica M.

Crashes in the Vicinity of Major Crossroads

Updated Roundabout Analysis Methodology

TENW Transportation Engineering NorthWest

FEBRUARY, 2001 ROAD DESIGN MANUAL (ENGLISH) 6-0(1)

Report Yi Qi, Xiaoming Chen, Yubian Wang, Guanqi Liu, and Yan Lu. Unclassified. Unclassified

HARKEY, DAVID LEE. Effect of Intersection Angle on the Safety of Intersections. (Under the direction of Dr. Joseph E. Hummer.)

Form DOT F (8-72) Technical Report Documentation Page. 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-05/ P1

LEFT-TURN LANE DESIGN AND OPERATION

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

The major street is typically the intersecting street with greater traffic volume, larger cross-section, and higher functional class.

USER GUIDE FOR R1-6 GATEWAY TREATMENT

Page 1 of KA

Training Strategies and Materials

DESIGN OF RIGHT-TURN LANES. Vergil G. Stover PhD, PE. Texas A&M University. and. Karen K. Dixon PhD, PE. Texas A&M Transportation Institute

Welcome! Urban Work Zone Design. Training Course 0-1

Prediction of Pedestrian Crashes at Midblock Crossing Areas using Site and Behavioral Characteristics Preliminary Findings

Background on the Revisions to VDOT s Access Management Spacing Standards

Roundabout Design 101: Roundabout Capacity Issues

PREDICTING THE PERFORMANCE OF AUTOMOBILE TRAFFIC ON URBAN STREETS

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES. Figure Title

Roundabouts 101: As Easy as 1-2-3

USER GUIDE FOR R1-6 GATEWAY TREATMENT

Evaluating Roundabout Capacity, Level of Service and Performance

Modern Roundabouts: a guide for application

Introduction to Transportation Engineering. Discussion of Stopping and Passing Distances

Access Management Standards

Pedestrian and Driver Distraction: Overview & NHTSA Prevalence and Risk Study. Heidi Coleman, NHTSA Bob Scopatz, VHB

JUNE, 2000 ROAD DESIGN MANUAL 5-0(1) CHAPTER 5 AT-GRADE INTERSECTIONS

New in the MUTCD: The Flashing Yellow Arrow Presented at the 57 th Annual Traffic and Safety Conference May 17, 2006

Design Considerations for Complete Streets. The Kiewit Center for Infrastructure and Transportation

Supported by a grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program 16. Abstract

Results from NCHRP 3-65: Applying Roundabouts in the United States

Roundabouts. By: Nezamuddin, Valparaiso University. February 19, 2015

The Traffic Monitoring Guide: Counting Bicyclists and Pedestrians. APBP 2017 June 28: 11:15am-12:45pm

Transcription:

Left-Turn Lane Design NCHRP Project 3-102 Marcus A. Brewer, P.E. Kay Fitzpatrick, Ph.D., P.E. Texas A&M Transportation Institute Transportation Short Course October 14, 2014 Image: Dan Walker

Research Objective To recommend improvements to the guidance provided in the AASHTO Green Book for auxiliary lanes at intersections, leading to improved safety and operations. Image: Marcus Brewer

Project Overview Conduct review of literature and ongoing research Interview DOT practitioners on current practice Identify issues Conduct double left-turn lane operational study Conduct deceleration lane operational study Prepare final report and revisions to GB

Current AASHTO Policy 2011 Green Book, Chapter 9 Speed (mph) Distance (ft) 20 70 30 160 40 275 50 425 60 605 70 820 Table 9-22 Figure 9-48

Literature Deceleration Rates Fambro, et al (NCHRP Report 400, 1997) 11.2 ft/s 2 for SSD, 24.5 ft/s 2 for maximum/emergency ITE Traffic Engineering Handbook (1999) 11.2 ft/s 2 maximum, up to 10 ft/s 2 reasonably comfortable Gates, et al (2007) Greater than 40 mph: 9.2, 10.9, and 13.6 ft/s 2 Less than 40 mph: 6.4, 8.3, and 11.6 ft/s 2

Questions What is speed differential for turning vehicles? How does speed differential vary based on taper length and/or posted speed limit? Are the 2011 Green Book deceleration rates representative of current left-turn drivers?

Site Selection Controls Taper Length above or below Green Book 8:1 (L:T) for speeds up to 45 mph 96 ft 15:1 (L:T) for speeds 50 mph and above 180 ft Posted Speed Limit (30-65 mph) 4 legs, signalized 4-lane major, 2- or 4-lane minor Straight, level, no skew

Study Sites PSL (mph) Taper Length (ft) Below Taper Threshold Above Taper Threshold 30-35 96 2 sites 2 sites 40-45 96 2 sites 2 sites 50-55 180 -- 2 sites 60-65 180 1 site 1 site 3 sites each in: Mobile, AL; Tallahassee, FL; Biloxi/Gulfport, MS; Austin/Pflugerville, TX

Data Collection Image: Debbie Murillo

Data Analysis Focus on three key guidelines from Green Book: 10 mph speed differential when the turning vehicle clears the through traffic lane (Note 3 in Table 9-22) 5.8 ft/s 2 average deceleration moving from the through lane into the left-turn lane (Note 4) 6.5 ft/s 2 average deceleration after moving laterally into the left-turn lane (Note 4)

Analysis of Speed Differential Observed larger differentials at larger upstream speeds, statistically significant predictor Upstream Speed (mph) Number of Vehicles with a Speed Differential (mph) of 0-10 10-20 20-30 > 30 Total 20-29 7 2 0 0 9 30-39 47 21 1 0 69 40-49 93 54 4 0 151 50-59 38 72 26 1 137 60-69 4 22 13 3 42 > 70 0 0 0 2 2 Total 189 171 44 6 410 Percent 46% 42% 11% 1% 100%

Speed Differential and Green Book No strong statistical relationship between deceleration length and speed differential Deceleration Length (ft) 400 300 200 100 0 0 10 20 30 40 Speed Differential (mph)

Deceleration Upstream of Taper About half of observed drivers were 6.1 ft/s 2 or more 85% of highspeed were > 4.2 ft/s 2 Cumulative Distribution 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 35-45 mph 50-65 mph Decel = 5.8 0 5 10 15 20 Deceleration (ft/s 2 )

Upstream Decel and Green Book GB guidelines recognize influence of speed, but decel rates/lengths not directly linked Guidelines flexible between 30 and 50 mph and allow consideration of other site characteristics Rate of 4.2 ft/s 2 in taper matches more drivers, especially at high-speed sites Tradeoffs for higher rate/shorter length

Deceleration in Decel Lane About half of low-speed drivers and 85% of highspeed were > 6.5 ft/s 2 Cumulative Distribution 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 35-45 mph 50-65 mph Decel = 6.5 0 5 10 15 20 Deceleration (ft/s 2 )

Decel Length and Green Book GB: it is not practical to provide full decel length in many locations Most study sites did not have full GB decel length Decel length and vehicle speed were statistically significant 10-ft increase in decel length reduces decel rate by 0.2 ft/s 2

Recommended Changes to Green Book Revise Figure 9-48 Image: Debbie Murillo

Recommended Changes to Green Book Speed (mph) Deceleration and Lane Change Distance (ft) Typical Constrained Current GB Decel Length (ft) 20 95 70 70 25 140 105 30 195 150 160 35 260 205 40 330 265 275 45 410 240 50 500 415 425 55 595 505 60 700 600 605 65 810 700 70 930 815 820 Revise Table 9-22 to show Typical: A twostage deceleration process of 4.2 ft/s 2 and 6.5 ft/s 2 Constrained: A single 6.5 ft/s 2 deceleration rate

NCHRP Report 780 available for download or purchase at http://www.trb.org/main /Blurbs/171328.aspx

Questions? Marcus A. Brewer M-brewer@tamu.edu Kay Fitzpatrick K-fitzpatrick@tamu.edu Image: Marcus Brewer