Water quality and species diversity survey of Thayer Farm ponds, summer 2006

Similar documents
Continued monitoring of fish community dynamics and abiotic factors influencing Moe Pond, summer 2006

Rat Cove and Brookwood Point littoral fish survey, 2002

Monitoring the Moe Pond ecosystem and population estimates of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) post unauthorized introduction

Fish Survey of Arctic Lake (ID # ), Scott County, Minnesota in 2012

BFS Technical Report #28. Limnological and fishery survey of a privately owned fishing preserve

Fisheries Survey of Saratoga Lake

MIDDLE FORK RESERVOIR Wayne County 2004 Fish Management Report. Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist

Annual monitoring of Moe Pond in conjunction with bio-manipulation

MARTINDALE POND Wayne County 2004 Fish Management Report. Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist

Quantitative description of predator diets prior and subsequent to walleye (Steizostedion vitreum) stocking in Otsego Lake

Walleye (Stizostidion vitreum) reintroduction update: Walleye stocking, gill netting and electrofishing summary

SOP Number: SOP026 Title: Fish Field Collection Methods Revision No: 04. Replaces: 03

2014 Threatened and Endangered Fish Survey of. East Loon Lake and West Loon Lake. Lake County, Illinois

JadEco, LLC PO BOX 445 Shannon, IL 61078

ASSESSMENT OF BLACK CRAPPIE AND WHITE PERCH IN HIGHLAND LAKE, STODDARD-WASHINGTON, NH (2014) New Hampshire

Continued observations of Moe Pond after the unauthorized stocking of smallmouth and largemouth bass

First-Year Growth and Survival of Largemouth Bass Fingerlings Stocked into Western South Dakota Ponds

Michigan Department of Natural Resources Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1

Diet analysis of predator fish in Otsego Lake prior and subsequent to walleye (Sander vitreus) stocking, 2005

Introduction: JadEco, LLC PO BOX 445 Shannon, IL 61078

Cedar Lake Comprehensive Survey Report Steve Hogler and Steve Surendonk WDNR-Mishicot

Hydroacoustic surveys of Otsego Lake s pelagic fish community,

Aquatic Plant Point-Intercept Survey for Cates Lake, Scott County, Minnesota

Willett Pond Fish Survey

Paulding Soil & Water Conservation District Fish Sale Guide

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Hydroacoustic survey of Otsego Lake, 2004

An Assessment of the Fish Community in Lake Acworth

Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1. Weber Lake Cheboygan County, T34N, R3W, Sec.

NURSERY POND Fish Management Report. Jason C. Doll Assistant Fisheries Biologist

PRODUCING A TROPHY LARGEMOUTH BASS FISHERY (CASE STUDY) Greg Grimes President of Aquatic Environmental Services, Inc.

NJ DIVISION OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Bureau of Freshwater Fisheries

Penny Road Pond Population Survey

2014 Island Lake Survey June 13 th, 2014 Andrew Plauck District Fisheries Biologist Report Prepared 4 March 2015

Chapter 3. Size-Selective Feeding of Zooplankton by Fish

BIG TWIN LAKE Kalkaska County (T28N, R05W, Section 18, and T28N, R06W, Section 13) Surveyed May 1999

RECREATIONAL PONDS AND LAKES

The Uptake of Mercury and Relationship to Food Habits of Fish in the South River and South Fork Shenandoah River

Keystone Lakes November 20, 2014

SNAIL MANAGEMENT IN CULTURE PONDS ROLE IN LIMITING GRUB ISSUES

Size, Age and Growth ofnesting Male Pumpkinseed Sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus) in Rat Cove, Otsego Lake, NY

Fall 2017: Problem Set 3 (DUE Oct 26; 50 points)

Crooked Lake Oakland County (T4N, R9E, Sections 3, 4, 9) Surveyed May James T. Francis

INLAND LAKE MANAGEMENT REPORT FY Spring 2008

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Caro Impoundment, Tuscola County

The impact of fish predation on invasive rusty crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) populations in two northern temperate lakes

Columbia Lake Dam Removal Project

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Overview of Recreational Pond Management

Fish Survey of Goose Lake (ID # ), Ramsey County, Minnesota in 2012

Lake LeAnn 2018 Fish Survey

Fish faunal changes in Otsego Lake s Shadow Brook watershed following application of best management practices

Student Worksheet: River Health and Indicator Species

Compilation of alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus) trap net catch in Rat Cove, Otsego Lake,

Fisheries Survey of White Rapids Flowage, Marinette County Wisconsin during Waterbody Identification Code

KICKAPOO LAKE Shakamak State Park Sullivan, Greene, and Clay Counties 2009 Fish Management Report. David S. Kittaka Fisheries Biologist

Comparative Survival of Pellet-Reared Muskellunge Stocked As Fingerlings In Bluegill Ponds With and Without Largemouth Bass

Arizona Game and Fish Department Region VI Fisheries Program

Anadromous Fish Survey Cameron Run 2015

Current Status and Management Recommendations for the Fishery in the Cloverleaf Chain of Lakes

The Fish Fauna of Cranberry Bog, Town of Burlington, Otsego County, N.Y.

MIDDLE FORK RESERVOIR Wayne County 2006 Fish Management Report. Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist

LITTLE WHITE OAK Knox County 2006 Fish Management Report. Debbie King Assistant Fisheries Biologist

Quemahoning Reservoir

Status of Lake Erie s Western Basin Fish Populations: Trends and Environmental Conditions

2011 Haha Lake Northern Pike Control

LOHI LAKE URBAN LAKES FISHERIES STUDY 2014

Inventory # Perch Lake

Largemouth Bass in Northern Wisconsin: Factors Regulating Recruitment and Potential Dietary Interactions with Walleyes

McGinty Slough Population Survey

Digital ESF. SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry. Devon Shaw. Joe Rubenstein. Shane Currey. Andrew Koch

Table 1. Physical Characteristics of Your Lake.

Alcona Dam Pond Alcona County (T25N, R5E, Sections various) Surveyed June 6-12 and September 16, 2003

Aquatic Plant Point-Intercept Survey for Pike Lake, Scott County, Minnesota

Big Bend Lake Population Survey

Status of rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax) in the Mohican Canyon Tributary, May 2014

Managing Chesapeake Bay s Land Use, Fish Habitat, and Fisheries: Studies. Jim Uphoff & Margaret McGinty, Fisheries Service

Relative Size Selectivity of Trap Nets for Eight Species of Fish'

The Uptake of Mercury and Relationship to Food Habits of Target Fish Species in the South River and South Fork Shenandoah River

Zooplankton Availability to. Larval Walleye (Sander vitreus) in Black Lake, MI, USA

I Region I Area I DOW Number / County I DOW Lake Name I Acreage I

Jason Blackburn, Paul Hvenegaard, Dave Jackson, Tyler Johns, Chad Judd, Scott Seward and Juanna Thompson

SUMMARY REPORT FOR LAKE ST. MALO FISHERIES ASSESSMENT. Prepared for the St. Malo and District Wildlife Association

Rolling Knolls Pond Population Survey

Aquatic invertebrate surveys of two ponds in Greenwoods Conservancy, one on and the other off the Volney-Marcy South Right of Way

AN ANALYSIS OF FISHING EFFORT AT INDIAN LAKE

Elk Lake, Antrim and Grand Traverse counties T. 28, 29 N., R. 8, 9 W., Sec. many. Lake surveys. began at 40 feet

LAKE SURVEY REPORT DRAFT VERSION PRELIMINARY DATA (AS OF 08/30/2018) Fisheries Management. DOW Number: Survey ID Date: 08/27/2018

Fish Community and Aquatic Ecosystem Responses to the Cessation of Eurasian Watermilfoil Chemical Treatment on Lake Ellwood, Wisconsin

Walleye (Sander vitreus) reintroduction update: Walleye stocking, gill netting and diet analysis 2007

Transforming Chadwick Lake

Little Calumet River Rapid Response Fish Identification and Enumeration Branch Summary Report

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

CARL BLACKWELL LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus) abundance in Onondaga Lake, A report to Onondaga County. January 2014

Onondaga Lake Fishery: 2011 Fact Sheet

Parasitic worms of fishes in tributaries of Otsego Lake

Zooplankton community structure in the northern Gulf of Mexico: Implications for ecosystem management

Archer Lake 2011 Survey Report Prepared by Brian Gunderman

Transcription:

Water quality and species diversity survey of Thayer Farm ponds, summer 2006 Aaron Payne 1 Brian Butler 2 INTRODUCTION Obtained through donation in 2000, the Thayer Farm located in Springfield consists of about 100 acres of active farmland surrounded by 164 acres of woodland and 1.6 acres of lakefront property (Gifford 2003, Meehan 2003). Scattered throughout the farm property are eleven man-made ponds (Figure 1). Originally the ponds had been habitually wet areas unable to be farmed; once dug out, they were traditionally used as bait ponds. Many of the ponds lie in close proimity to each other. Ponds 1 and 2 are connected by a small stream and ponds 3 8 (collectively called the chain ponds ) can connect in times of high water (Meehan 2003). The purpose of this study was to begin and continue water quality monitoring of the Thayer Farm ponds as well as to establish baseline information with respect to fish, plant and zooplankton species presence and diversity and to catalogue the ponds physical characteristics such as depth at center, surface area and approimate volume. An analogous, though more abbreviated, water quality study was conducted in the summer of 2002 (Meehan 2003). Figure 1. Map of the Thayer Farm indicating pond designations and locations with black dots identifying water quality sampling locations surveyed over summer 2006 (from Meehan 2003). 1 Biological Field Station Intern, summer 2006. Present affiliation: SUNY Oneonta, NY. 2 Peterson Family Conservation Intern, summer 2006. Present affiliation: SUNY Oneonta, NY.

METHODS Water quality Water samples from all eleven of the Thayer Farm ponds were collected over a two-day window beginning on 20 June 2006. The water samples were analyzed for total phosphorus, total nitrogen, nitrite+nitrate and ammonia. The aforementioned tests were preformed once using the Lachat QuickChem FIA+ water autoanalyzer. Table 1 shows a summary of methodologies used to conduct the above tests. A Hydrolab Scout II, (Hydrolab Corp. 1993) calibrated according to the manufacturer s instructions preceding its employment, was used to determine parameters such as conductivity (mmho/cm), dissolved oygen concentration (mg/l), ph and temperature (degrees Celsius) at each site. Hydrolab testing in ponds 1-10 was done from a few meters off shore. The Hydrolab testing was conducted twice in each pond over a three week period, beginning on 20 June 2006. In pond 11 Hydrolab testing was done from a boat at 1m intervals starting at the surface and ending just above the bottom (this was the only pond having a maimum depth greater than 1.7m). All test sites are indicated in Figure 1. Parameter Preservation Method Reference Total Phosphorus-P H 2 SO 4 to ph<2 Persulfate digestion followed by single reagent ascorbic acid Liao and Marten, 2001. Total Nitrogen-N H 2 SO 4 to ph<2 Cadmium reduction method following peroodisulfate digestion Pritzlaff, 2003; Ebina et. al 1983. Nitrite+Nitrate-N H 2 SO 4 to ph<2 Cadmium reduction Pritzlaff, 2003. Ammonia-N H 2 SO 4 to ph<2 Phenolate Liao 2001. Table 1. Summary of laboratory methodologies used on Thayer ponds nutrient data calculations, summer 2006. Physical Characteristics Pond depths were taken from a canoe using a hand held depth-meter. Measurements were taken at three points in transect along the length of each pond for oblong ponds such as ponds 8, 9 and 11. For all other ponds only a center depth measurement was taken. The surface area of the ponds was found using aerial photos with a known scale and a Tamaya Plani 5,6 planimeter, used according to the instruction manual (Tamaya Technics Inc). Surface area and depth measurements were used to calculate approimate volume of the ponds. For the sake of calculating volume, it assumed that each pond was conical in shape. The formula used was volume= surface area ⅓ maimum depth.

Zooplankton Zooplankton sampling sites for all ponds were the same as the water quality sampling sites (see Figure 1); samples were taken in the same two-day window, beginning on 20 June 2006. An approimate volume of 5 liters of surface water was concentrated to a volume less than 100mL using a 63µm meshed plankton filter. The samples were put in a sample bottle and kept cool until preserved in 70% ethanol. Each preserved sample was further concentrated to a final volume of 100 ml, giving a final concentration factor of 50. Three separate 1ml sub-samples were viewed on a Sedgwick rafter cell under a research grade compound microscope with digital imaging capabilities. Any zooplankton found was identified and measured. Species Presence and Diversity: Fish The ponds varied in character to the etent that no single protocol could reasonable survey the fish communities. Therefore, three methods of collection were employed, including the use of minnow traps, seining and electrofishing. Five minnow traps were placed in ponds 1-10. Traps were placed in ponds 6-10 on 19 June 2006 and removed 27 June, while traps were placed in ponds 1-5 on 27 June 2006 and removed on 5 July. Traps were baited with bread and crackers and placed in the sites where water quality was evaluated. Seining was performed on 15 June 2006 and on 14 July 2006 in pond 11. On each day, two locations were seined: off the southwest shore and off the northwest shore. The technique used mimics that of the 2005 Moe Pond study (Dresser 2006). Fish were collected using a 200ft haul seine deployed with a john boat. Lengths (mm) of all fish collected were recorded and scale samples and stomach contents were taken from fish larger than 150 mm. Using a microprojector the annual rings on the scales were counted to determine age of the specimen. A standard gastric lavage was used to dispel the stomach contents into sample bags (Foster 1977). Stomach contents were preserved in 70% ethanol and identified using Perckarsky et. al. (1990). Seining was also done on 26 July 2006 in ponds 2, 9 and 10. A 25ft shore seine was used to collect fish. Species and number collected was recorded; lengths and stomach contents were not collected because all fish collected were less than 150mm. Electrofishing was preformed with a Smith-Root backpack unit along the shoreline of ponds 1 and 3-8, in areas that were accessible and depth permitted. Times the ponds were fished ranged from 176 seconds to 350 seconds. Stunned fish were collected using hand-held scap nets and transferred to a five gallon bucket. Note of species and number collected was recorded; lengths and stomach contents were not collected because all fish collected were less than 150mm. Standard electrofishing procedures as outlined by Murphy (1996) were used..

Species Presence and Diversity: Aquatic Vegetation The qualitative collection of plants was done in all ponds ecept pond 9, which was devoid of any visible plant life, on 21 June 2006. Two methods were used in determining species presence and diversity in the Thayer Farm ponds. In ponds 1-8 hand harvesting was done. In ponds 10 and 11 a plant rake was used. Plant samples collected were placed in plastic bags, brought back to the Field Station and identified. Specimens were mounted and curated. Limnology/ Water Quality RESULTS AND DISCUSSION All summer mean nutrient and physical water quality data from the eleven ponds in 2006 are shown in Table 2. That table also shows comparative physical water quality data from the Thayer ponds averaged over summer 2002. Ponds 3 and 4 were not tested in 2002 due to low water levels (Meehan 2003). Pond 10 ehibited the highest average surface water temperature at 23.84 C, while pond 2 ehibited the lowest average surface temperature at 19.4 C (Table 2). The temperature readings collected by Meehan in 2002 were consistently higher than the 2006 figures, varying up to 8.57 C from the 2006 data. Dissolved oygen (DO) values colleted in 2003 were quite dissimilar from the values collected in 2006 (Table 2). The DO values collected from both years ranged of between 1.82mg/l and 14.39mg/l, with the 2002 values differing +/- 6.57mg/l from the 2006 values. Recorded values from both years for ph and conductivity were similar (Table 2), varying +/- 1.54 and +/- 0.120mmho/cm, respectively (Meehan 2003). In 2006, average dissolved oygen was highest in pond 11 (11.27 mg/l) and lowest in pond 5 (3.12mg/l). Pond 3 had the lowest average conductivity and ph levels (.012mmho/cm and 6.225); Pond 10 had the highest average conductivity reading at.272mmho/cm, and pond 11 had the highest average ph of 8.22. The levels of total phosphorus (TP) were generally higher in 2003 compared to 2006 with the eception of ponds 1, 7 and 10 (Table 2). Total phosphorus level ranged from 11.7µg P/L in pond 11 to 120µg P/L in pond 1. The nitrite+nitrate levels were also higher in 2003 compared to those collected in 2006 (Meehan 2003) (Table 2). In 2006, ammonia and nitrite+nitrate readings were below detectable levels (< 0.02 mg N/L) (Table 2). Given that ammonia and nitrite+nitrate were below detection in all instances, and total nitrogen (TN) (which is comprised of ammonia, nitrite+nitrate and organic nitrogen) was measurable, (ranging between 0.057mg N/L and 0.268mg N/L), virtually all nitrogen present in the Thayer ponds would have been bound in organic form, such as algae or other dissolved organic materials. Based upon the TN: TP ratio in algal biomass of 7 10 established by

Vallentyne (1974), algal production in bodies of water with ratios greater than 10 should be epected to be limited by phosphorus; likewise, algal production in waters with ratios less than 7 are epected to be nitrogen limited. Because soluble nitrogen is lacking in the Thayer ponds, and the TN: TP ratios for all the ponds ecept for ponds 9 and 11 were less than 7 (Table 3) it appears that nitrogen, rather than phosphorus, is limiting algal production. The TN: TP ratios in ponds 9 and 11 fall within the 7-10 range and therefore could potentially be limited by either nitrogen or phosphorus. Pond # Date Temp. ( C ) Diss. Oygen (mg/l) Cond. (mmho/cm) ph Total Nitrogen (mg N/L) Ammonia (mg N/L) Total Phosphorus (µg P/L) Nitrite + Nitrate (mg N/L) 1 19.40 8.40 0.156 7.87 0.199 BD 120 BD 2 18.02 10.71 0.243 7.87 0.125 BD 38.7 BD 3 23.79 7.22 0.124 6.23 0.195 BD 116 BD 4 20.67 4.89 0.135 6.63 0.175 BD 84.2 BD 5 20.24 3.12 0.137 6.61 0.216 BD 80.6 BD 6 20.94 4.45 0.130 7.11 0.268 BD 163 BD 7 22.56 8.89 0.150 7.22 0.194 BD 63.1 BD 8 22.12 6.61 0.217 7.26 0.163 BD 31 BD 9 22.68 8.02 0.220 7.85 0.127 BD 16.8 BD 10 23.85 8.14 0.273 7.70 0.057 BD 15.2 BD 11 (0m) 23.71 11.27 0.205 8.22 0.098 BD 11.7 BD 11 (1m) 21.18 14.39 0.258 7.82 Data not taken 11 (2m) 18.06 9.04 0.258 7.44 Data not taken 11 (2.5m) 17.10 6.39 0.265 7.24 Data not taken 1 22.60 1.82 0.276 7.19 76 0.04 2 24.75 6.86 0.230 7.69 136 0.03 3 Data not taken 4 Data not taken 5 28.81 8.83 0.131 7.83 88 0.04 6 23.96 2.85 0.111 7.30 180 0.04 7 28.60 11.12 0.074 9.36 30 0.03 8 28.13 7.92 0.172 8.80 66 0.02 9 28.59 9.35 0.245 8.09 63 0.08 10 26.80 8.10 0.159 7.90 15 0.02 11 27.07 6.56 0.334 7.72 19 0.02 2006 2002 Table 2. Average physical water properties (i.e. conductivity, dissolved oygen concentration, ph and temperature) and nutrient data (i.e. total phosphorus, total nitrogen, nitrite+nitrate and ammonia) of Thayer ponds, summer 2006; pond numbers correspond to pond labels shown in Figure1. BD = below detection (< 0.02mg N/L). Site Pond 1 Pond 2 Pond 3 Pond 4 Pond 5 Pond 6 Pond 7 Pond 8 Pond 9 Pond 10 Pond 11 0m TN:TP 1.66 3.23 1.68 2.08 2.68 1.64 3.07 5.26 7.56 3.72 8.40 Table 3. The calculated TN: TP ratios (mg N/L: µg P/L) of the Thayer ponds, as indicated in Figure 1, for the summer 2006.

Morphological Characteristics Table 4 shows the depths, surface areas and estimated volumes of the Thayer ponds. A dash ( ) indicates a measurement was not applicable and therefore not taken. The greatest center depth found in the ponds was 2.9 meters in pond 11. The shallowest recorded center depth was 0.9 meters in pond 8. Possible interference of submerged matter and/or plants may have created some discrepancies between measured and actual depths. Due to the shallow nature and locations of the Thayer ponds the likelihood of fluctuations in depths, surface areas and volumes is relatively high. The surface areas of the ponds are shown in Table 4, measured in both hectares and acres. Values for volume are approimated. The smooth sloped nature of the pond bottoms, the center depth typically being the maimum depth, and the mean depth was approimately one-third maimum depth were the grounds for the assumption that pond were conical in shape. The failure to take any irregularities in bottom surface into account when calculating volumes make any recorded figures ineact and disputable. Estimated pond volumes are shown in Table 4. Pond Center West East North South Surface Surface Volume (m) bank (m) bank (m) bank (m) bank (m) area (ha) area (ac) (m 3 ) Pond 1 0.6 0.03 0.08 61 Pond 2 1.1 0.03 0.07 111 Pond 3 1.0 0.03 0.08 99 Pond 4 1.1 0.03 0.06 91 Pond 5 1.4 0.05 0.12 223 Pond 6 1.5 0.08 0.21 419 Pond 7 1.5 0.08 0.21 404 Pond 8 0.9 1.0 1.3 0.12 0.31 515 Pond 9 1.1 1.0 1.1 0.24 0.58 886 Pond 10 1.6 0.03 0.07 154 Pond 11 2.9 4.6 0.7 1.49 3.66 22846 Table 4. Depths, surface areas and appro. volumes of Thayer ponds, summer 2006; pond numbers correspond to pond labels shown in Figure1. Zooplankton On average, zooplankton densities were 66 individuals/l in the Thayer ponds, the most commonly found being nauplii (larval copepods). Figure 2 shows the quantity per liter by type of zooplankton found in each pond. The largest diversity of zooplankton was found in ponds 1 and 5 in which three different zooplankter types were found. Pond 6 had the highest total number of zooplankton per liter (207/l), and pond 10 had none. The average lengths of the zooplankton collected is shown in Table 5.

appro. number per liter 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Pond Bosmina longirostris Cyclopoid Nauplius Keretalla cochlearis Platyias quadricornis Unknown Rotifer Asplanchna priodontus Figure 2. Approimate number per liter of common zooplankton in Thayer ponds, collected on 20 and 21 June 2006; pond numbers correspond to pond labels shown in Figure 1. Species Pond 1 Pond 2 Pond 3 Pond 4 Pond 5 Pond 6 Pond 7 Pond 8 Pond 9 Pond 10 Pond 11 Average length (µm) Cladocera Bosmina longirostris 228 228 Copepoda Cyclopoid 343 343 Nauplius 133 141 130 84 117 151 111 185 132 Rotifera Keretalla cochlearis 172 160 126 94 96 81 83 116 Platyias quadricornis 218 218 Unknown Rotifer 67 67 Asplanchna priodontus 119 119 Table 5. Average measured lengths of zooplankton collected on 20 and 21 June 2006 from Thayer ponds; pond numbers correspond to pond labels shown in Figure1. Fish Presence and Diversity The numbers and type of fish caught in each pond via minnow traps is shown in Figure 3. The category Lepomis includes both blue gill (Lepomis macrochirus) and pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus), many of which couldn t be distinguished because they were too young. Also found in the minnow traps were golden shiners (Notemigonus crysoleucas), fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) and yellow perch (Perca flavescens). In ponds 2, 7 and 10 no fish were found in the minnow traps. Aside from fish, several other aquatic organisms were caught in the minnow traps. Commonly found in the minnow traps were rusty crayfish (Orconectes rusticus), and various types and life stages of amphibians.

Number caughtr 25 20 15 10 5 Lepomis Golden Shinner Fathead Minnows Yellow Perch 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Pond Figure 3. Fish caught in the Thayer ponds using minnow traps set on 19 June 2006 for ponds 6-10 and on 27 June 2006 in ponds 1-5; pond numbers correspond to pond labels shown in Figure 1. The relationship between length and age for fish seined from pond 11, the only pond having a balanced community of both forage and game fish, is shown in Figure 4. For all fish species collected, there was a positive correlation between length and age, (see trend line for large mouth bass (Micropterous dolomieui) on Figure 4, for eample). Overall, pumpkinseeds were the most frequently documented fish, with 47 collected during the three seines. The net most commonly documented fish were large mouth bass, with32 collected, followed by 17 young of the year Lepomis, 9 redbreasts (Lepomis auritus), 4 yellow perch and 1 golden shiner. The data collected from seining ponds in 2, 9 and 10, as well as electrofishing ponds 1 and 3-8, are shown in Table 6. YOY indicates young of the year, or fish that were too young to distinguish species.

12 10 Age(annual scale rings) 8 6 4 Large Mouth Bass Pumpkinseed 2 Red Breast Yellow Perch Linear (Large Mouth Bass) 0 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 Length (mm) Figure 4. Measured length in millimeters vs. age calculated through annual scale rings of fish seined from Thayer pond 11 on 15 June 2006; pond numbers correspond to pond labels shown in Figure1. Pond Method Time Fathead Minnow Golden Shinner Pumpkinseed Lepomis (yoy) pond 1 Electorfishing 250 0 0 7 0 pond 2 Shore sein n/a 0 127 0 0 pond 3 Electorfishing 350 3 1 0 0 pond 4 Electorfishing 350 41 0 0 0 pond 5 Electorfishing 182 2 5 1 1 pond 6 Electorfishing 176 0 0 2 0 pond 7 Electorfishing 350 0 1 5 0 pond 8 Electorfishing 350 0 0 8 0 pond 9 Shore sein n/a 221 23 145 0 pond 10 Shore sein n/a 2 0 0 0 Table 6. Methods used, times electrofished and fish collected, from 26 July 2006 seining and electrofishing of Thayer ponds 1-10; pond numbers correspond to pond labels shown in Figure1. Figure 5 shows the stomach contents collected from the fish on the 15 June 2006 seining of pond 11. Most commonly found was diptera, with 190 aquatic and 16 terrestrial life stages found (including both aquatic and terrestrial life stages). Stomach contents were collected from 14 pumpkinseeds, 12 large mouth bass, 4 red breasts, 3 yellow perch and 1 golden shiner.

250 Numbers consumed 200 150 100 50 0 Amphipoda Odonata Coleoptera Diptera Arachnid Mollusca larval fish juvenile fish Taa Figure 5. Collective fish stomach contents from 14 pumpkinseeds, 12 large mouth bass, 4 red breasts, 3 yellow perch and 1 golden shiner collected in the 15 June 2006 seining of Thayer pond 11. Plant Presence and Diversity Overall 16 different plant species were found in the Thayer ponds. Table 7 shows the plants present in the ponds; an indicated plant presence. Not including pond 9, which had no visible plant life, each pond contained at least 2 different plant species. Pond 11 had the largest diversity,containing 7 different species of plants. Most commonly found throughout the ponds was Veronica sp. (needs verification) Chara vulgaris Eleocharis sp. Elodea canadensis Juncus spp. Lemna minor Nymphaea odorata Potamogeton pectinatus Potemogeton crispus Potemogeton natans Potemogeton oblongus Potemogeton zosteriformis Sagittaria spp. Utricularia vulgaris Vallisneria americana Veronica sp. (needs verification) Table 7. Plant presence and diversity in Thayer ponds, summer 2006; pond numbers correspond to pond labels shown in Figure1.

CONCLUSION The work conducted was designed to serve as a preliminary survey of the Thayer ponds physical and chemical water quality as well as an aquatic vegetation and fish presence and diversity survey. Aimed at being the grounds for detecting drastic changes in any of the above mentioned parameters, such as the introduction of a foreign species, and its effect on the state of the pond, no viable and all inclusive conclusions can be made with out future research and analysis. REFERENCES Dresser, K. 2006. Continued monitoring of the dynamics of Moe Pond after the introduction of smallmouth bass (Micropterous salmoides) and largemouth bass (Micropterous dolomieui). In 38 th Annual Report (2005). SUNY Oneonta Bio. Fld. Sta., SUNY Oneonta. Ebina, J., T. Tsutsui, and T. Shirai.1983. Simultaneous determination of total nitrogen and total phosphorus in water using peroodisulfate oidation. Water Res. 17(12): 1721-1726. Foster, J.R. 1977. Pulsed gastric lavage: An efficient method of removing the stomach contents of live fish. The progressive fish culturist 39:4. Gifford, K. A. 2003. Thayer Farm Master Plan, 2003. Rensselaer, NY. Hydrolab Corporation, 1993. Scout 2 operating manual. Hydrolab Corp. Austin, TX. Liao, N. 2001. Determination of ammonia by flowinjection analysis. QuikChem Method 10-107-06-1-J. Lachat Instruments. Loveland, Colorado. Liao, N. and S. Marten, 2001. Determination of total phosphorus by flow injection analysis colorimetry (acid persulfate digestion method).quikchem Method 10-115-01-1-F. Lachat Instruments. Loveland, Colorado. Meehan, H. 2003. Physiochemical Survey of Thayer Farm Ponds. In 35 th Annual Report (2002). SUNY Oneonta Bio. Fld. Sta., SUNY Oneonta. Murphy, B.R. and D.W. Willis. 1996. Fisheries techniques, 2 nd edition. American Fisheries Society. Bethesda, MD. Peckarsky, B.L., P.R. Fraissinet, M.A. Penton and D.J. Conklin, Jr. 1990. Freshwater Macroinvertebrates of Northeastern North America. Cornell University Press. Ithaca, NY.

Pritzlaff, D. 2003. Determination of nitrate/nitrite in surface and wastewaters by flow injection analysis. QuikChem Method 10-107-04-1-C. Lachat Instruments. Loveland, Colorado. Somerville, T., and Albright, M.F. 2006. A survey of Otsego Lake s zooplankton community, summer 2005. In 38 th Annual Report (2005). SUNY Oneonta Bio. Fld. Sta., SUNY Oneonta. Tamaya Technics Inc. Digital planimeter Plani 5,6 instruction manual. Tamaya Technics Inc. Tokyo, Japan. Vallentyne, J.R. 1974. The algal bowl. Can. Fish. Mar. Serv. Misc. Publ. 22.