N Length (μm) % with eyespots Pilot ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± 16 70

Similar documents
Chapter 4: 2-D Kinematics

One-factor ANOVA by example

Legendre et al Appendices and Supplements, p. 1

Stats 2002: Probabilities for Wins and Losses of Online Gambling

Behavioral Responses of Invertebrate Larvae to Water Column Cues. Jeanette Danielle Wheeler

One Way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance)

EVALUATION OF ADULT PACIFIC LAMPREY PASSAGE AND BEHAVIOR IN AN EXPERIMENTAL FISHWAY AT BONNEVILLE DAM

Methods for estimating decapod larval supply and settlement: importance of larval behavior and development stage

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and

Swimming rate and responses of larvae of three mactrid bivalves to salinity discontinuities*

3. Approximately how far will an object near Earth's surface fall in 3.0 seconds? m m m m

Maturity and Spawning of the Small Yellow Croaker, Larimichthys polyactis

CEE 345, Part 2, Winter 2012, Final Exam Solutions (Open Channel Flow)

The Animated Eyes Symbol as Part of the WALK Signal: An Examination of the Generality of its Effectiveness Across a Variety of

Statistical Analysis of PGA Tour Skill Rankings USGA Research and Test Center June 1, 2007

CHAPTER ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION Average total number of collisions for a try to be scored

Puyallup Tribe of Indians Shellfish Department

LAST NAME First Name(s) Student Number Practical Group as on student card as on student card Code

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level

Behavioral responses of larvae of the crab Neopanope sayi to hydrostatic pressure

Evidence for predator-induced behavioral plasticity of juvenile red king crab (Paralithodes camtschaticus)

Novel empirical correlations for estimation of bubble point pressure, saturated viscosity and gas solubility of crude oils

Analysis of Variance. Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

A Combined Recruitment Index for Demersal Juvenile Cod in NAFO Divisions 3K and 3L

Optimum Size for Planting Hatchery Produced Oyster Seed

IDAHO COOPERATIVE FISH AND WILDLIFE RESEARCH UNIT

PSY201: Chapter 5: The Normal Curve and Standard Scores

Module 3: Hydrostatic forces on submerged bodies Lecture 7: Calculation of horizontal component, buoyancy. Forces on submerged bodies (continued)

Experimental Design and Data Analysis Part 2

One-way ANOVA: round, narrow, wide

Introduction to Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) The Structural Model, The Summary Table, and the One- Way ANOVA

STREAM DRIFT. Much variation among taxa: Fraction of benthos drifting: Distance drifted? at any moment? over 24 hr period?

STUDY ON THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE AUTOCHTHONOUS GOAT BREEDS EXPLOITED IN THE FARM OF S.C. AGROFAM HOLDING FETEŞTI

Experimental Studies of Factors Affecting Coral Recruitment Success in La Parguera, Puerto Rico. Alina Szmant (UNCW) and Ernesto Weil (RUM)

Policy Management: How data and information impacts the ability to make policy decisions:

ANIMATED LED EYES TRAFFIC SIGNALS

Section 4.2 Objectives

Dangerously bold Featured scientist: Melissa Kjelvik from Michigan State University

Nursery: facilities and culture of post-larvae

Conditioned Alarm Behavior in Fathead Minnows (Pimephales promelas) and Test Their Ability

Shellfish Habitat Restoration Project in Cocagne Bay and Shediac Bay Final Report

Technical Report

ITS Animated LED Signals. Alert Drivers to Pedestrian Threats

Prokopios Chatzakis, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Science 1

University of Kassel Swim Start Research

Yasuyuki Hirose 1. Abstract

save percentages? (Name) (University)

Comparative growth of pinfish in field mesocosms across marsh, oyster, and soft-bottom habitat types in a Mississippi estuary

Gas Laws. Introduction

Dangerously bold Featured scientist: Melissa Kjelvik from Michigan State University

Name May 3, 2007 Math Probability and Statistics

RESEARCH ARTICLE Earliest ciliary swimming effects vertical transport of planktonic embryos in turbulence and shear flow

Khosla's theory. After studying a lot of dam failure constructed based on Bligh s theory, Khosla came out with the following;

TOUR HANDICAP POLICIES

Chapter 2 Two Dimensional Kinematics Homework # 09

Hydroacoustic surveys of Otsego Lake s pelagic fish community,

ACTIVITY 1: Buoyancy Problems. OBJECTIVE: Practice and Reinforce concepts related to Fluid Pressure, primarily Buoyancy

HOW FAST/FAR DOES FLY LINE FALL? N. Perkins of the University of Michigan, March 2003

HOWSHAM FISH MONITORING

THE PLAYING PATTERN OF WORLD S TOP SINGLE BADMINTON PLAYERS

Confidence Interval Notes Calculating Confidence Intervals

The effect of external compression of the eye on intraocular pressure

Title. Author(s)Li, Zhe; Yamamoto, Jun; Sakurai, Yasunori. CitationFisheries science, 81(5): Issue Date Doc URL. Rights.

Movements and diving behavior of Atlantic bluefin tuna Thunnus thynnus in relation to water column structure in the northwestern Atlantic

COPYRIGHT. Production Logging Flowmeter Survey Solution Guide

STANDARD SCORES AND THE NORMAL DISTRIBUTION

Exploration Series. HOT AIR BALLOON Interactive Physics Simulation Page 01

and B.J. Burke National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries) 2725 Montlake Blvd, East, Seattle, Washington for

2 Buoyant Force. TAKE A LOOK 2. Identify What produces buoyant force?

If a fair coin is tossed 10 times, what will we see? 24.61% 20.51% 20.51% 11.72% 11.72% 4.39% 4.39% 0.98% 0.98% 0.098% 0.098%

Impacts of Suspended Sediments in San Francisco Bay on the Viability of Pacific Herring Early Life Stages Studies #1 & #2

EVALUATION OF FISHWAY MODIFICATIONS TO IMPROVE PASSAGE OF ADULT CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD THROUGH THE TRANSITION POOL AT LOWER GRANITE DAM, 2008

Running head: DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION 1

Fast method for Ginseng Analyses using Agilent Poroshell 120 Columns Scaled from a Traditional Method

Preliminary results of SEPODYM application to albacore. in the Pacific Ocean. Patrick Lehodey

From: Michael A. Jepson, Tami C. Clabough, and Christopher C. Caudill

Observed pattern of diel vertical migration of Pacific mackerel larvae and its implication for spatial distribution off the Korean Peninsula

Can bivalve veligers escape feeding currents of adult bivalves?

SEED PRODUCTION of TURBOT (Psetta maxima)

Physics Final Exam Review Fall 2013

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SOME INDICES AND BODY COEFFICIENTS OF SILURUS GLANIS AND CYPRINUS CARPIO IN DIFFERENT STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT

CASE STUDY FOR USE WITH SECTION B

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE WINNING AND DEFEATED FEMALE HANDBALL TEAMS IN RELATION TO THE TYPE AND DURATION OF ATTACKS

Effect of airflow direction on human perception of draught

ANALYSIS OF LONGLINE CATCH PER VESSEL IN THE WESTERN AND CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN

Loughs Agency. Foyle, Carlingford and Irish Lights Commission. Pre-Fishery Stock Assessment Lough Foyle Native Oyster Fishery.

WIND DATA REPORT. Paxton, MA

PLANNED ORTHOGONAL CONTRASTS

Device Description. Operating Information. CP Q (eq. 1) GT. Technical Bulletin TB-0607-CFP Hawkeye Industries Critical Flow Prover

INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOURTH MEETING. La Jolla, California (USA) 29 April - 3 May 2013

WIND DATA REPORT. Bourne Water District

1) What is the magnitude of the momentum of a kg baseball traveling at 45.0 m/s?

Population characteristics of a recovering US Virgin Islands red hind spawning aggregation following protection

AIS data analysis for vessel behavior during strong currents and during encounters in the Botlek area in the Port of Rotterdam

WIND DATA REPORT. Ragged Mt Maine

Unit4: Inferencefornumericaldata 4. ANOVA. Sta Spring Duke University, Department of Statistical Science

Wave Transmission Testing of the Martin Ecosystems BioHaven Floating Breakwater

Factorial Analysis of Variance

The water supply for a hydroelectric plant is a reservoir with a large surface area. An outlet pipe takes the water to a turbine.

Procedia Engineering Procedia Engineering 2 (2010)

Transcription:

Supplementar material for Meer KS, Wheeler JD, Houlihan E, Mullineaux LS (2018) Desperate planktotrophs: decreased settlement selectivit with age in competent eastern oster (Crassostrea virginica) larvae. Mar Ecol Prog Ser Table S1. Average size and percentage of larvae with eespots at each age in the pilot experiment. N, number of individuals sub-sampled. Intervals represent standard deviation. Experiment Hours postcompetenc N Length (μm) Height (μm) % with eespots Pilot 0 22 273 ± 22 262 ± 17 54 4 26 276 ± 16 271 ± 19 54 8 30 287 ± 18 271 ± 25 60 12 30 298 ± 26 287 ± 16 70 Table S2. Analsis of variance in settlement behaviors in response to settlement cue and larval age in the pilot experiment. Two-wa ANOVA tests for differences in the proportion of larvae remaining on the bottom of experimental flasks and larval swimming velocities. Factors are Cue (presence or absence of a settlement cue) and Age (larval age in hours post-competenc. Significant p-values (<0.05) shown in bold. Behavioral metric Experiment Factor F p Proportion of larvae Pilot Cue 40.1 < 0.001 staing on bottom Age 0.47 0.650 Cue x Age 0.53 0.605 Velocit of downward- Pilot Cue 9.15 0.004 swimming larvae Age 1.69 0.189 Cue x Age 2.34 0.092

Table S3. Analsis of variance of explorator behaviors in response to settlement cue and larval age in the pilot experiment. Two-wa ANOVA tests for differences in the upward swimming velocit of larvae, average gross:net distance ratio (GNDR), and proportion swimming in helices. Factors are Cue (presence or absence of a settlement cue) and Age (larval age in hours post-competenc. Significant p-values (<0.05) shown in bold. Behavioral metric Experiment Factor F p Velocit of upward- Pilot Cue 8.59 0.007 swimming larvae Age 0.24 0.868 Cue x Age 6.95 0.001 GNDR of downward- Pilot Cue 12.7 0.001 swimming larvae Age 1.24 0.310 Cue x Age 4.45 0.010 GNDR of upward- Pilot Cue 2.78 0.108 swimming larvae Age 0.200 0.895 Cue x Age 0.64 0.595 Proportion downward- Pilot Cue 8.43 0.006 swimming larvae Age 1.86 0.191 performing helices Cue x Age 1.07 0.375 Proportion of upward- Pilot Cue 1.56 0.223 swimming larvae Age 0.89 0.461 performing helices Cue x Age 1.90 0.156

Proportion larvae staing on bottom Fig. S1. Proportion of Crassostrea virginica larvae remaining on the bottom after swimming down as a function of larval age in the pilot experiment. Larvae were exposed to filtered seawater (no cue; light bars) or a chemical settlement cue (dark bars) in a pilot experiment. Error bars show standard error. 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Hours post-competenc

Vertical swimming velcoit (cm/s) Vertical swimming velocit (cm/s) Fig. S2. Vertical swimming velocit of downward-swimming Crassostrea virginica larvae as a function of age in the pilot experiment. Larvae were exposed to filtered seawater (no cue; light bars) or a chemical settlement cue (dark bars) in a pilot experiment. Error bars show standard error. 0.0 Hours post-competenc -0.1-0.2-0.3-0.4-0.5 Downward-swimming larvae Fig. S3. Vertical swimming velocit of upward-swimming Crassostrea virginica larvae as a function of age in the pilot experiment. Larvae were exposed to filtered seawater (no cue; light bars) or a chemical settlement cue (dark bars) in a pilot experiment. Error bars show standard error. The missing error bar at t = 4 hours indicates onl one replicate had larvae swimming up off the bottom. Dissimilar letters indicate significant post hoc differences between ages, tested separatel for no-cue (a, b, c) and cue (, z) treatments. 0.15 0.10 0.05 b a a ab Upward-swimming larvae 0.00 Hours post-competenc

Gross to net distance ratio Gross to net distance ratio Fig. S4. Gross to net distance ratio (GNDR) of Crassostrea virginica larvae in the pilot experiment as a function of age for larvae swimming downward to the bottom of the flask following introduction (A) and larvae swimming back up off the bottom (B). Larvae were exposed to filtered seawater (no cue; light bars) or a chemical settlement cue (dark bars) in a pilot experiment. Error bars show standard error. The missing error bar at t = 4 hours indicates onl one replicate had larvae swimming up off the bottom. Dissimilar letters indicate significant post hoc differences between ages, tested separatel for no-cue (a, b, c) and cue (, z) treatments. 4 A 2 a ab b ab Downward-swimming larvae 0 Hours post-competenc 10 5 B Upward-swimming larvae 0 Hours post-competenc

Prop. larvae performing helices Prop. larvae performing helices Fig. S5. Proportion of Crassostrea virginica larvae in the pilot experiment swimming in helices as a function of age for larvae swimming downward to the bottom of the flask following introduction (A) and larvae swimming back up off the bottom (B). Larvae were exposed to filtered seawater (no cue, light bars) or a chemical settlement cue (dark bars) in a pilot experiment. Error bars show standard error. The missing error bar at t = 4 hours indicates onl one replicate had larvae swimming up off the bottom. 0.50 0.25 A Downward-swimming larvae 0.00 Hours post-competenc 1.0 B 0.5 Upward-swimming larvae 0.0 Hours post-competenc

Table S4. Non-parametric statistical results for heteroscedastic larval behavioral metrics. Mann-Whitne (M-W) and Kruskal-Wallis (K-W) tests show differences in the proportion of larvae remaining on the flask bottoms, downward swimming velocit of larvae, average gross:net distance ratio, and proportion swimming in helices. Factors are Cue (presence or absence of a settlement cue) and Age (larval age in hours post-competenc. Significant p- values (<0.05) shown in bold. Behavioral metric Experiment Test Factor χ 2 or U p Proportion larvae Pre and Post M-W Cue 133 < 0.001 remaining on bottom K-W Age 2.74 0.253 Velocit of downward- Time Series M-W Cue 663 0.453 swimming larvae K-W Age 1.14 0.887 GNDR of downward- Time Series M-W Cue 695 0.164 swimming larvae K-W Age 10.9 0.027 Pre and Post M-W Cue 297 0.007 K-W Age 3.31 0.191 GNDR of upward- Time Series M-W Cue 474 0.063 swimming larvae K-W Age 3.07 0.545 Proportion downward- Time Series K-W Age 8.01 0.091 swimming larvae Pre and Post M-W Cue 330 < 0.001 performing helices Proportion of upward- Time Series M-W Cue 514 0.388 swimming larvae performing helices K-W Age 2.94 0.568