CHAPTER 18 NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC SAFETY TABLE OF CONTENTS

Similar documents
County of Spartanburg South Carolina

Town of Mooresville, North Carolina Neighborhood Traffic Calming and Control Device Policy

City of Vestavia Hills Traffic Calming Policy for Residential Streets

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

City of Cape Coral Traffic Calming. City Council May 16,

City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines

Appendix C. TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM TOOLBOX

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Carroll County, Maryland

CHAPTER 4 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS

County of Greenville South Carolina. Traffic Calming Program Neighborhood Traffic Education Program and Speed Hump Program

TOWN OF HALTON HILLS TRAFFIC CALMING PROTOCOL. Page 1 of 25

II. EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS

Community Transportation Plan

CHAPTER 7 STREET DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

City of Grass Valley Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Adopted November 12, 2002 Revised February 1, 2006

TOWN OF PAYSON TRAFFIC CALMING MANUAL

Draft Traffic Calming Policy Paper

POLICY FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

3.1 TRAFFIC CALMING PROCESS SUMMARY

West Broad Street Traffic Study

TRAFFIC CALMING TOOLBOX

Traffic Calming Guidelines

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CLAY COUNTY

Meeting of the City Commission City Hall Meridian Avenue Dade City, Florida

Traffic Calming Primer. Pat Noyes & Associates

City of Vallejo Traffic Calming Toolbox

City of Charlottesville Traffic Calming Handbook

Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections

Prepared By: Town of Waxhaw Traffic Calming Policy

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

Traffic Calming SECTION 1, CHAPTER Introduction What is Traffic Calming?

CHAPTER 7 STREET DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 1 SUMMARY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Issues and Observations Public Meeting (December 2005) 1

City of Lee s Summit, Missouri

Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy & Guidelines

Neighborhood Traffic Calming Guidelines

TRAFFIC CALMING. Michaela Ledvinova 1

Traffic Calming Design

RESIDENTIAL TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

Public Information Centre

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

Traffic Calming Policy Manual

CITY OF DUNWOODY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

Table of Contents Introduction...1. A. Background B. Introduction to Traffic Calming Devices Purpose Statement...

Town of Southwest Ranches Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program

MEMORANDUM TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF DRAFT NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDELINES

MUTCD Part 6G: Type of Temporary Traffic Control Zone Activities

City of Prince Albert Statement of POLICY and PROCEDURE. Department: Public Works Policy No. 66. Section: Transportation Issued: July 14, 2014

CROSSING GUARD PLACEMENT CONSIDERATIONS AND GAP ASSESSMENT

TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY NEWTOWN TOWNSHIP DELAWARE COUNTY, PA

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

A Residential Guide to Neighborhood Speed Enforcement

Speed Feedback Radar Trailer

Victoria Park Master Plan

Traffic Calming Policy

Neighborhood Traffic Management and Calming Program. April 2013

TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY & PROCEDURES

Malvern Borough Local Traffic Calming

$ 12" $#&%$ 86.) *1! *1 /3 )00, , (1* Neighborhood Traffic Calming Part 3 Solutions Bradley William Yarger, P.E.

Town of Christiansburg. Traffic Calming Program

TRAFFIC CALMING TOOLBOX. For the residents of the City of Decatur, Georgia

CITY OF COCONUT CREEK IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING

Borough of Danville, PA Traffic Calming Program Guidelines

Neighborhood Traffic Management Program Adopted July 9, 2012

8.1 PURPOSE OF TRAFFIC CALMING

Residential Traffic Calming Handbook

3.1 TRAFFIC CALMING PROCESS SUMMARY

Traffic Calming Program

VILLAGE OF NILES TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY

Traffic Calming Program Update

NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM. Policy and Procedure. Roswell Department of Transportation (770)

City of Overland Park Traffic Calming Program

City of Edinburg Department of Public Works 415 W. University Dr. Edinburg, TX (956) SPEED HUMPS INSTALLATION POLICY

Citizens Handbook for Requesting Traffic Calming Devices

Peer Review of Highlands Neighborhood Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Plan

City of Overland Park Collector Street Traffic Calming Program

SAGINAW CHARTER TOWNSHIP - NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

San Clemente Traffic Calming Policy and Resource Manual

Gateway Signs. Description: Sign reminding drivers of the need to drive slowly Issues addressed: speeding Cautions/Limitations: Application:

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

WELCOME Public Information Centre

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program

Residential Traffic Calming Program Guide. Town of Ashland, Virginia

SELECTED ROADWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS

TRAFFIC CALMING PLANNER S PORTFOLIO

City of Roxboro Traffic Calming Policy for Neighborhood Streets

Intersection Safety 6/7/2015 INTERSECTIONS. Five basic elements should be considered in intersection design. Intersection Safety (continued)

Southside Road. Prepared for: City of St. John s Police & Traffic Committee. Prepared by: City of St. John s Traffic Division

City of Port St. Lucie Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy City of Port St. Lucie Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy Adopted June 26, 2017

Bikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

Arlington s Master Transportation Plan

Town of Clarkstown Traffic Calming Program. Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1.0 Introduction Purpose Goals Policies Responsibility Cost Toolbox...

NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY

General Design Factors

Improve the livability of our streets by

Transcription:

CHAPTER 18 NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC SAFETY TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 18.1 General... 18-1 18.1.1 Intended Use...18-1 18.1.2 Traffic Calming for New Street Design...18-1 18.1.3 Roundabouts and Mini Roundabouts...18-1 18.2 Traffic Safety Problems... 18-1 18.2.1 Speeding...18-1 18.2.2 Measuring Speed of Roadway...18-2 18.2.3 Intrusion (Cut-Through Traffic)...18-2 18.2.4 Pedestrian Safety...18-2 18.3 Traffic Calming Design Criteria... 18-2 18.3.1 Speed Limit Signs...18-2 18.3.2 Speed Humps...18-2 18.3.3 Dips...18-2 18.3.4 Mini Roundabouts...18-3 18.3.5 Neckdowns...18-3 18.3.6 Traversable Barriers...18-3 18.3.7 Deviations (Chicanes)...18-3 18.3.8 Raised Intersections...18-3 18.3.9 Neighborhood Identification Island...18-3 18.3.10 Drop Off Zone for Schools...18-3 18.3.11 Intersection Chokers...18-3 18.3.12 Turn Prohibitors...18-3 18.3.13 Semi-Diverters...18-3 18.3.14 Lane Eliminating Choker Loveland (GMA and city limits)...18-3 18.3.15 Diagonal Diverters...18-3 18.3.16 Realigned Intersections...18-4 Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards Repealed and Reenacted April 1, 2007 Page 18-i Adopted by Larimer County, City of Loveland, City of Fort Collins

LIST OF TABLES This Chapter Does Not Contain Tables LIST OF FIGURES Figures are Located at End of Chapter Figure 18-1 Figure 18-2 Figure 18-3 Figure 18-4 Figure 18-5 Figure 18-6 Figure 18-7 Figure 18-8 Figure 18-9 Figure 18-10 Figure 18-11 Figure 18-12 Neckdowns Traversable Barriers Deviations (Chicanes) Raised Intersections Neighborhood Identification Island Drop Off Zone for School Intersection Choker Turn Prohibitors Semi-Diverters Lane Eliminating Choker Diagonal Diverters Realigned Intersections Page 18-ii Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards Repealed and Reenacted April 1, 2007 Adopted by Larimer County, City of Loveland, City of Fort Collins

Chapter 18 NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC SAFETY Section 18.1 General CHAPTER 18 NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC SAFETY 18.1 GENERAL This chapter presents acceptable methods of neighborhood traffic calming that are determined by the Local Entity to be necessary for existing Local and Minor Collector Roadways. This chapter also provides for specific design criteria for a number of traffic calming methods. 18.1.1 Intended Use The necessity or desire for traffic safety and calming stems from the perception that Local and Minor Collector Roadways, particularly in residential areas, do not always function as intended. These roadways should be low traffic volume roadways used for direct access to residences on the street. They are also intended as a multi-modal system that is shared by vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic equally, in a manner that minimally impacts residents in these areas. 18.1.2 Traffic Calming for New Street Design The devices presented in this chapter are generally not intended for use on new roadways. New roadway design is addressed in Chapter 7, Street Design and Technical Criteria. New (local streets and minor collectors) are to be designed to minimize cut through traffic, high volumes, and high speed operation and to maximize the efficiency of the roadway to provide vehicular access and bicycle and pedestrian traffic. 18.1.3 Roundabouts and Mini Roundabouts Roundabouts and Mini Roundabouts, considered traffic control measures, are included in Chapter 8, Intersections. These traffic control measures may be used in new or existing street design if the appropriate criteria are met. 18.2 TRAFFIC SAFETY PROBLEMS Some residents in certain residential areas maintain that excessive speed, volume, or cut-through traffic is unacceptable. The resident believes the presence of too many vehicles traveling at high speeds diminishes that neighborhood s quality of life. Traffic calming measures are intended to minimize these issues and return the quality of life to the neighborhood. Care must be taken by the designer so that the installation of traffic calming devices does not create unintended hazards that delay emergency response or jeopardize the safety of bicyclists, pedestrians or motorists. 18.2.1 Speeding Speeding may occur on roadways that allow the driver to feel safe while exceeding the posted speed limit. Factors that contribute to this perception include long, unbroken lines of sight, steep roadway grades, wide roadways, low density developments, low pedestrian activity, and large building setbacks. In addition, speeding may occur when the street functions as a higher classification street than originally intended. Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards Repealed and Reenacted April 1, 2007 Page 18-1 Adopted by Larimer County, City of Loveland, City of Fort Collins

Chapter 18 NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC SAFETY Section 18.3 Traffic Calming Design Criteria 18.2.2 Measuring Speed of Roadway The standard method of measuring speed on any street is the determination of the 85th percentile speed. The 85th percentile speed is the speed at which or below which 85 percent of the vehicles travel. If the 85th percentile speed is at or below the posted speed limit, a speeding problem does not exist. However, if the 85th percentile speed is over the posted speed limit by 5 miles per hour or greater, either the posted speed limit may be inappropriate or a speeding problem may exist. Many other factors must be evaluated for determining speed limit. 18.2.3 Intrusion (Cut-Through Traffic) Intrusion is increased volume or excessive non-local traffic along a neighborhood street. This cut-through traffic is caused by drivers who use a Local Street to go through a neighborhood and save time on their trip. Local Streets that are less impeded than other local streets within the same neighborhood will often invite cut-through traffic. Routes that are perceived to be time-saving will attract more traffic. This increased cut-through traffic can cause a local street to function more like a Collector. 18.2.4 Pedestrian Safety Pedestrian safety is a concern on streets experiencing speeding vehicles, cut-through traffic, or a combination of these problems. The high concern areas are in the vicinity of neighborhood schools and parks or mid-block pedestrian crossings, particularly on streets with on-street parking. These areas require special consideration for the mobility and safety of the pedestrian. 18.3 TRAFFIC CALMING DESIGN CRITERIA For existing Local or Minor Collectors that are defined for Traffic Calming. Refer to the City of Loveland s Traffic Calming Procedures. Refer to the City of Fort Collins Traffic Calming Procedures. This chapter describes design criteria for the engineered solutions. It does not state when or where these improvements are to be used. 18.3.1 Speed Limit Signs Refer to Chapter 14, Traffic Signals, Signing, and Striping 18.3.2 Speed Humps Refer to Construction Drawing 1801F and 1802F for design criteria in Fort Collins (GMA and city limits). 18.3.3 Dips Refer to Chapter 8, Intersections, for standard Crosspan design. Page 18-2 Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards Repealed and Reenacted April 1, 2007 Adopted by Larimer County, City of Loveland, City of Fort Collins

18.3.4 Mini Roundabouts Chapter 18 NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC SAFETY Section 18.3 Traffic Calming Design Criteria Refer to Chapter 8, Intersections for Mini Roundabout design requirements. 18.3.5 Neckdowns When neckdowns are used they must be designed to maintain a constant cross fall in the pavement surface. Refer to Figure 18-1 for design criteria. 18.3.6 Traversable Barriers Refer to Figure 18-2 for design criteria. 18.3.7 Deviations (Chicanes) Refer to Figure 18-3 for design criteria. 18.3.8 Raised Intersections Refer to Figure 18-4 for design criteria. 18.3.9 Neighborhood Identification Island Refer to Figure 18-5 for design criteria. 18.3.10 Drop Off Zone for Schools Refer to Figure 18-6 for design criteria. 18.3.11 Intersection Chokers Refer to Figure 18-7 for design criteria. 18.3.12 Turn Prohibitors Refer to Figure 18-8for design criteria. 18.3.13 Semi-Diverters Refer to Figure 18-9for design criteria. 18.3.14 Lane Eliminating Choker Loveland (GMA and city limits) Refer to Figure 18-10 for design criteria. 18.3.15 Diagonal Diverters Refer to Figure 18-11 for design criteria. Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards Repealed and Reenacted April 1, 2007 Page 18-3 Adopted by Larimer County, City of Loveland, City of Fort Collins

18.3.16 Realigned Intersections Chapter 18 NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC SAFETY Section 18.3 Traffic Calming Design Criteria Refer to Figure 18-12 for design criteria. Page 18-4 Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards Repealed and Reenacted April 1, 2007 Adopted by Larimer County, City of Loveland, City of Fort Collins