NEED FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BATHYMETRIC SURVEY DATA COLLECTION

Similar documents
Tutorial for the. Total Vertical Uncertainty Analysis Tool in NaviModel3

STUDY REPORT W&AR-03 RESERVOIR TEMPERATURE MODEL ATTACHMENT B DON PEDRO RESERVOIR BATHYMETRIC STUDY REPORT

ICES Guidelines for Multibeam Echosounder Data (Compiled September 2006)

14/10/2013' Bathymetric Survey. egm502 seafloor mapping

Advantages of Using Combined Bathymetry and Side Scan Data in Survey Processing T.M. Hiller, L.N. Brisson

Evaluation of the Klein HydroChart 3500 Interferometric Bathymetry Sonar for NOAA Sea Floor Mapping

THE CHALLENGES OF A LARGE-AREA BATHYMETRIC SURVEY

Utilizing Vessel Based Mobile LiDAR & Bathymetry Survey Techniques for Survey of Four Southern California Breakwaters

ENVIRONMENT AGENCY GREAT OUSE AND 100 FT DRAIN QUARTERLY BATHYMETRIC SURVEY DECEMBER 2013 SITE SURVEY REPORT NO. H6787

METHODS PAPER: Downstream Bathymetry and BioBase Analyses of Substrate and Macrophytes

HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY OF DAVE BOYER (WALTERS) LAKE

INTERNATIONAL HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY STANDARDS

Data Collection and Processing: Elwha Estuary Survey, February 2013

Paper for consideration by ENC Working Group. Use of AU6 ENC cells as an option for Bathymetric ENCs (benc)

Bathymetry Data Collection for Subaqueous Soil Mapping. Maggie Payne 2 nd National Workshop on Subaqueous Soils Rhode Island August 9-12, 2010

Evaluation of June 9, 2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Study for Town of Weymouth, Norfolk, Co, MA

Challenges in determining water surface in airborne LiDAR topobathymetry. Amar Nayegandhi, Dewberry 15 th Annual JALBTCX Workshop, June 11 th 2014

Performance Analysis of the EdgeTech 6205 Swath Bathymetric Sonar

WMS 8.4 Tutorial Hydraulics and Floodplain Modeling HY-8 Modeling Wizard Learn how to model a culvert using HY-8 and WMS

PORTS AUSTRALIA. PRINCIPLES FOR GATHERING AND PROCESSING HYDROGRAPHIC INFORMATION IN AUSTRALIAN PORTS (Version 1.5 November 2012)

UTEC Survey Pipeline Inspection Using Low Logistic AUV June 2016

Geospatial Positioning Accuracy Standards Part 5: Standards for Nautical Charting Hydrographic Surveys - Public Review Draft

Interferometric Swath Bathymetry for Large Scale Shallow Water Hydrographic Surveys

Determination of Survey Boat Heave Motion with the Use of RTS Technique

Hydroacoustic surveys of Otsego Lake s pelagic fish community,

Examples of Carter Corrected DBDB-V Applied to Acoustic Propagation Modeling

Survey Technical Support Notes October 2015

Sontek RiverSurveyor Test Plan Prepared by David S. Mueller, OSW February 20, 2004

CONTRACTOR DOCUMENT FRONT SHEET NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED H P C - D E V X X R E T

BathySurvey A Trimble Access hydrographic survey module

Marine Renewables Industry Association. Marine Renewables Industry: Requirements for Oceanographic Measurements, Data Processing and Modelling

FINAL REPORT. December Contract No. SAIC Project No SAIC Report No Buffer Zone

EMPA 2017 How can the S-102 Bathymetric Surface Product improve safety in navigation and pilotage?

Body Search and Recovery Using Sonar

LiDAR My favourite tool in the bag 2011 St Kitts & Nevis

GNSS Technology for the Determination of Real-Time Tidal Information

BOTTOM MAPPING WITH EM1002 /EM300 /TOPAS Calibration of the Simrad EM300 and EM1002 Multibeam Echo Sounders in the Langryggene calibration area.

DRAFT. October 17, 2014 File No Mr. Brendhan Zubricki Town Administrator Essex Town Hall 30 Martin Street Essex, MA.

DUKC Chart Overlay. Presentation to IHO TWL and DQ Working Groups Wollongong, March 2014

Advanced PMA Capabilities for MCM

Paper for Consideration by HSSC8 Development of an Additional Bathymetry Layer standard based on S-57/S-52

Meeting the Challenges of the IHO and LINZ Special Order Object Detection Requirements

1 st Tidal and Water Level Working Group Meeting DHN, Niteroi, Brazil 31/03/09 02/04/09 Vertical Offshore Reference Framework (VORF) Chris Jones

Design and Planning Considerations For a Seabed Survey

HYDROGRAPHIC AND SITE SURVEY REPORT

A comparison of deltaic structure in forested and deforested watersheds using highresolution

High Precision Hydrography in Canada, the ST. Lawrence River Channel, HD Bathymetry, Production, Distribution and Updating

Appendix E Cat Island Borrow Area Analysis

WASHINGTON CONSERVATION DISTRICT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE (S.O.P.)

IFREMER, Department of Underwater Systems, Toulon, France. L u c i e Somaglino, P a t r i c k J a u s s a u d, R o main P i a s co, E w e n Raugel

United States - Canada Hydrographic Commission Halifax, Canada May 16, NOAA Nautical Chart Manual Updated for Satellite Derived Bathymetry

V Complying with IHO S-52/S-63/S-64

Malta Survey activities

Eelgrass and Macroalgae Presence/Absence Preliminary Surveys BHP Proposed Grays Harbor Potash Export Facility A Task 400

AHO s experience on HD bathymetric ENCs

Measuring Discharge in Shallower Rivers: ADCPs go from Rio to Pro

Activities of KHOA on creation of S-10X test data sets and S-100 sea trial

Condition of Improvements 30 December 2014 Wrangell Harbors, Alaska (CWIS No , )

Nearshore Habitat Mapping in Puget Sound Using Side Scan Sonar and Underwater Video

E4014 Construction Surveying. Hydrographic Surveys

Bay County, MI Coastal Hazard Analysis Flood Risk Review Meeting. May 14, 2018

Real Time Surveying GPS and HYDRO Software for Tide and Swell Compensation

A PRACTICAL APPROACH TO QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ANALYSIS OF DEPTH DATA

CLARIFICATION PAPER DREDGED MATERIAL VOLUME ESTIMATES

Hydrographic Surveying Methods, Applications and Uses

Underwater Videographic and Hydroacoustic Eelgrass Survey Chimacum/Irondale Beach Restoration Site September 12, 2006

MAHS Field School 2018 Pickles Reef Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary

: Hydrodynamic input for 2D Vessel Simulations (HY- 0027)

WOODFIBRE LNG VESSEL WAKE ASSESSMENT

Developing a Method to Validate the Navigational Bathymetric Database

UPPER BEACH REPLENISHMENT PROJECT RELATED

Figure 4, Photo mosaic taken on February 14 about an hour before sunset near low tide.

CONSTRUCTION OF LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL ON THE SAINT LAWRENCE TIDAL CURRENT CONDITIONS IN THE LEVIS AREA

PORTSMOUTH HARBOR AND PISCATAQUA RIVER NEW HAMPSHIRE AND MAINE NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENT STUDY FEASIBILITY REPORT APPENDIX G

Coastal Wave Energy Dissipation: Observations and Modeling

GPS-based Vertical Control, Unaided by a Shore Station

APPENDIX A Hydrodynamic Model Qualicum Beach Waterfront Master Plan

S-44 edition 5 The IHO s New Standard For Hydrographic Surveys Chris Howlett Head of Seabed Data Centre United Kingdom Hydrographic Office

South Bay Coastal Ocean Observing System California Clean Beaches Initiative

S-102 v2.0 Status Brief

SHORE PROTECTION AND HABITAT CREATION AT SHAMROCK ISLAND, TEXAS ABSTRACT

Assisting in the Management of Waterways

Anatomy of a Depth Survey

Sussex County, DE Preliminary Study Overview

Juneau Douglas Harbor

Emerging Subsea Networks

Cruise Report. Field Oceanography. Team 5, Leg 3

2016 NC Coastal Local Governments Annual Meeting

Introduction. Industrial Water Challenges. Adrian McDonald, CEE HydroSystems USA, Inc.

APPENDIX 3E HYDROACOUSTIC ANALYSIS OF FISH POPULATIONS IN COPCO AND IRON GATE RESERVOIRS, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER

Tex-1001-S, Operating Inertial Profilers and Evaluating Pavement Profiles. Chapter 10 Special Procedures. Overview

Assateague Island National Seashore North End Restoration Project Timeline

Vieques Underwater Demonstration Project

Hydrodynamic Modeling of Tides and Hurricane Storm Surge for Pre- and Post-Dredging Conditions in the Lower St. Johns River, Florida

DIRECT INVENTORY TAKING OF UNDERWATER OBJECTS USING A HANDHELD GPS RECEIVER

OFFICE OF STRUCTURES MANUAL FOR HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHAPTER 11 APPENDIX B TIDEROUT 2 USERS MANUAL

Compiled by Uwe Dornbusch. Edited by Cherith Moses

Hydrographic Surveying:

VIRGINIA SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION BOARD GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ON DAM BREAK INUNDATION ZONE AND INCREMENTAL DAMAGE ANALYSIS AND MAPPING PROCEDURES

Canadian Hydrographic Service PREFACE

Transcription:

305 West Grand Avenue, Suite 300 Montvale, New Jersey 07645 Phone 201.930.9890 Fax 201.930.9805 www.anchorqea.com M EMORANDUM To: Caroline Kwan and Nica Klaber U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 2 Date: From: Amy Corp, Anchor QEA, LLC Project: 120782-01.01 Cc: Jim Quadrini and Tom Schadt, Anchor QEA, LLC Re: FSAP Addendum No. 4 Supplemental Bathymetric Survey Data Collection This addendum to the Field Sampling and Analysis Plan (FSAP; Anchor QEA 2011a), which was approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) on October 28, 2011, presents an addition to Section 4.2.2 Hydrographic Surveys and describes the procedures that will be followed to perform a supplemental bathymetric survey to evaluate where and to what degree the October 2012 storm Sandy may have altered sediment elevations in Newtown Creek. NEED FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BATHYMETRIC SURVEY DATA COLLECTION An initial bathymetric survey was conducted during October and November 2011, as summarized in the Phase 1 Remedial Investigation Interim Data Report (Anchor QEA 2012). Additional hydrographic surveys were determined to be necessary to assess the potential effects of the October 2012 storm Sandy on the Study Area. The purpose of the supplemental bathymetric survey is to: Confirm the bottom topography and water depths for the modeling domain after the recent storm events. Identify areas of potential (or consequential) change in bed elevation for possible additional surface sediment investigation. Information collected during this supplemental survey will be compared to the 2011 bathymetric data and used for various purposes during the Remedial Investigation (RI), such as for revising the conceptual site model, adjusting potential future sampling locations, performing hydraulic analyses and associated computer modeling, and performing contaminant fate and transport modeling. I:\Projects\Newtown_Creek\Deliverables\FSAP\08-FSAP Addendum 4-Bathy\04 Final 2012-12-10\NC_DRAFT_FSAP_Addendum4_2012-12-10.docx

DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURES Caroline Kwan and Nica Klaber Page 2 The bathymetric survey will be conducted in accordance with the methods described in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Engineer Manual (EM) 1110-2-1003, Hydrographic Surveying, dated January 1, 2002. All of the work performed will be documented, and this documentation will be stored in the project files, as described in the Data Management Plan (DMP; Anchor QEA 2011b). This survey will cover the entire length of the Study Area. To provide greater coverage of the creek bottom, the bathymetric survey will be conducted using a Multi-beam Echo Sounder (MBES) multi-beam survey system. The multi-beam system will be used to the maximum extent possible, including surveying shallow areas during the high tide window (to maximize vessel accessibility). Where used, the MBES system will provide 100-percent coverage of the creek bottom and facilitate the direct comparison of these measurements to those obtained during the fall 2011 single-beam survey. In limited access areas, including nearshore portions of the channel, Dutch Kills, Maspeth Creek, and the heads of side channels, a single-beam survey system will be deployed from a smaller limited-access vessel. For navigation in both the single-beam and multi-beam surveys, the same transect line-file from the 2011 survey will be used with the intent to reoccupy the lines from the 2011 survey when possible. For the single-beam survey, transect spacing will follow the procedures used in 2011 (sufficient to provide data at 10-foot spacing) in identical longitudinal (i.e., shore-parallel) transects approximately 20 feet apart throughout most of the Study Area. These longitudinal transects will be augmented by shore-perpendicular cross-tie transects spaced approximately 200 feet apart. The single-beam transects will follow the 2011 survey transects to the extent practicable and will overlap with the borders of the multi-beam survey areas. Single-beam equipment use and system accuracy will follow the specifications outlined in Section 4.2.2.2 of the FSAP (Anchor QEA 2011a). Multi-beam survey transect spacing will be similar to procedures used in 2011 for the single-beam survey. Transects will be approximately 20 feet apart or at a distance that insures a greater than 100-percent coverage of the bottom. The nadir (vertical beam) will be aimed, when possible, to reoccupy the survey lines from the 2011 single-beam survey. These longitudinal transects will be augmented by shore-perpendicular cross-tie transects spaced

Caroline Kwan and Nica Klaber Page 3 approximately 200 feet apart. The multi-beam depth measurements will be collected using an Odom, Inc., MB-1 echo sounder equipped with a 200-kilohertz (khz) transducer, which forms up to 512 beams across a 120-degree swath of sediment bed. The nadir theoretical accuracy of the MB-1 is approximately 0.1 percent of the water depth with a resolution of 0.033 foot (1 centimeter). Measures will be taken in the field during surveying to achieve this level of accuracy. Digital depths, as well as quantitative backscatter and side scan sonar data, will be recorded to the survey software. All other bathymetric survey assessment activities, including navigation, instrument calibrations, and vertical corrections, will follow the procedures outlined in Section 4.2.2.2 of the FSAP (Anchor QEA 2011a). STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES The following standard operating procedures (SOPs) provided in the FSAP (Anchor QEA 2011a), which include data collection forms as applicable, are relevant to this activity: SOP NC-01 Field Records SOP NC-02 Equipment Decontamination DATA PROCESSING, ANALYSIS, AND MANAGEMENT Bathymetry data will be downloaded and saved to the project files. Paper records will be scanned and sent to the Data Management Task Manager. The bathymetric data will be processed by removing outlying data points associated with floating debris or vegetation and converting raw soundings to true elevations. The soundings will be converted to North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88) vertical elevations using the procedures identified in the FSAP (Anchor QEA 2011a), including the use of two gauges (time-synchronized pressure transducers) installed within the Study Area. After these adjustments, data will be exported from hydrographic surveying software (HYPACK) in a single American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII) delimited file with fields for northing, easting, elevation, tide correction, and raw depth. Differences between co-located points occupied on perpendicular transects will be tabulated and statistically analyzed to assess and report data quality relative to promulgated USACE Performance Standards. The ASCII file will be used to create gridded surfaces of the sediment bed. A

Caroline Kwan and Nica Klaber Page 4 surface of 1.0-foot square grid cells will be created based on a 95-percent confidence interval analysis of data points. The interpolation method will be selected based on seabed relief and complexity. The surface will be created using the single-beam data and populating it with multi-beam data where available. A contour map of the survey area will be developed from the grid, with the contour interval of 1.0 foot. The resolution of the data will be 1.0-foot square pixels, which are the result of the average of the multi-beam data points with added weight to values closest to the nadir beam using a HYPACK sub-processing routine. Bathymetric survey data will include bathymetry data in electronic format (ASCII X,Y,Z) and bathymetry contours at 1-foot intervals plotted in hardcopy (1 inch = 200 feet scale) and in digital AutoCAD-compatible and ArcView GIS-compatible formats. Survey data will be loaded into Anchor QEA, LLC s (Anchor QEA s) geographic information system- (GIS-) based spatial database and added to the Study Area basemap. REPORTING Upon completion of the surveys and an initial quality review by the Project Quality Assurance (QA) Coordinator or designee, the data will be compiled into summary maps, including a map showing computed elevation differences between the 2011 and 2012 bathymetric survey results, with supporting text. These maps will be included in the Phase 1 RI Data Summary Report, RI Report, and other deliverables, as appropriate. SCHEDULE The bathymetric survey is planned to be conducted in December 2012 to inform subsequent post-sandy surface sediment investigations. The bathymetry data processing and its comparison to the fall 2011 bathymetry measurements will be completed by February 2013. The results of this evaluation will then be used to help inform the selection of appropriate locations for follow-up surface sediment sampling. The schedule will be dependent on weather and field conditions.

REFERENCES Caroline Kwan and Nica Klaber Page 5 Anchor QEA (Anchor QEA, LLC), 2011a. Field Sampling and Analysis Plan. Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study, Newtown Creek. October 2011. Anchor QEA, 2011b. Data Management Plan. Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study, Newtown Creek. October 2011. Anchor QEA, 2012. Phase 1 Remedial Investigation Interim Data Report. Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study, Newtown Creek. June 2012. AC:vs:rrw