Road Safety Report 2003 to 2007

Similar documents
Hawkes Bay Region State Highways Road Safety Report 2005 to 2009

Northland Region road trauma for Northland Region. Road casualties Estimated social cost of crashes* Major road safety issues

the Ministry of Transport is attributed as the source of the material

Deaths/injuries in motor vehicle crashes per million hours spent travelling, July 2007 June 2011 (All ages) Mode of travel

the Ministry of Transport is attributed as the source of the material

the Ministry of Transport is attributed as the source of the material

2003 road trauma for. Wairoa District. Road casualties Estimated social cost of crashes* Major road safety issues WAIROA DISTRICT JULY 2004

briefing notes - road safety issues

road safety issues 2002 road trauma for TNZ Region Two July 2003 Road deaths Estimated social cost of crashes* Major road safety issues

People killed and injured per million hours spent travelling, Motorcyclist Cyclist Driver Car / van passenger

Napier City road trauma for Napier City. Road casualties Estimated social cost of crashes* Major road safety issues.

2 ROAD SAFETY OUTCOMES

Water Safety New Zealand Drowning Prevention Report

road safety issues 2001 road toll for Gisborne district July 2002 Road user casualties Estimated social cost of crashes*

WATER SAFETY NEW ZEALAND DROWNING PREVENTION REPORT 2015

Risk on the Road. Pedestrians, Cyclists and Motorcyclists August 2015

NEW ZEALAND DROWNING REPORT

Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Road Safety Partnership Handbook

Bicycle Crashes. Number of Bike Crashes. Total Bike Crashes. are down 21% and severe bike crashes down 8% since 2013 (5 years).

Water Safety New Zealand Drowning Prevention Report

A review of 2015 fatal collision statistics as of 31 December 2015

Western Bay of Plenty/ Tauranga Area

road safety issues 2002 road trauma for Tauranga District July 2003 Regional crash causes Estimated social cost of crashes*

Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Road Safety Partnership Handbook

BSA New Zealand All District Health Board Coverage Report

MTCF. Michigan Traffic Crash Facts FACT SHEETS

2015 Victorian Road Trauma. Analysis of Fatalities and Serious Injuries. Updated 5 May Page 1 of 28. Commercial in Confidence

MTCF. Michigan Traffic Crash Facts FACT SHEETS

New Zealand Cycling Safety Summit

Review of Fatal Collisions

Alberta. Traffic Collision Statistics. Office of Traffic Safety Transportation Services Division May 2017

Police Recorded Injury Road Traffic Collisions and Casualties Northern Ireland

NCSP New Zealand Northland District Health Board Coverage Report

NCSP New Zealand Northland District Health Board Coverage Report

NCSP New Zealand All District Health Board Coverage Report

Crash Patterns in Western Australia. Kidd B., Main Roads Western Australia Willett P., Traffic Research Services

Review of Collision Sites. Presented by: Forbes Vigors Date: 24 th Sep 2012 Venue: Engineers Ireland, Clyde Road

Published 24th June 2016 Published 31 st August Police Service of Northern Ireland Police Service of Northern Ireland

NCSP New Zealand Hawke s Bay District Health Board Coverage Report

land transport road assets

Road Safety Trends, Targets and Safety Programs in New Zealand. by Dr Shane Turner

Table of Content. Cyclist Injury Crashes APPENDIX GIS Heat Maps by Municipality P a g e

Encouraging Taxi Drivers to Behave: Grafton Bridge Taxi and Bus Lane Trial. Rob Douglas-Jones Tim Segedin, Edin Ltd.

land transport road assets

Alberta. Traffic Collision Statistics

For further information contact: Alberta Infrastructure and Transportation Office of Traffic Safety Main Floor, Twin Atria Building Avenue

2010/11 Road Policing Programme (RPP) A variation of the 2009/12 RPP

2014 QUICK FACTS ILLINOIS CRASH INFORMATION. Illinois Emergency Medical Services for Children February 2016 Edition

2012 QUICK FACTS ILLINOIS CRASH INFORMATION. Illinois Emergency Medical Services for Children September 2014 Edition

Summary of bicycle helmet law results in Western Australia

Alberta. Traffic Collision Statistics

Police Recorded Injury Road Traffic Collisions and Casualties Northern Ireland. Detailed Trends Report 2015

For Information Only. Pedestrian Collisions (2011 to 2015) Resolution. Presented: Monday, Apr 18, Report Date Tuesday, Apr 05, 2016

COLLISION STATISTICS May Engineering Services Box 5008, th Avenue Red Deer, AB T4N 3T4

Truck Tractor Trailer Crash Analysis

Discover the Safe System Approach

For further information contact: Alberta Transportation Office of Traffic Safety Main Floor, Twin Atria Building Avenue Edmonton, Alberta T6B

2017 Drowning Prevention Report (Provisional)

Transportation and Public Works Annual Motor Vehicle Collision Report

STUDY AND ANALYSIS OF ACCIDENTS ON NH 71-A

BUILDING (POOLS) AMENDMENT BILL

R J Tunbridge and J T Everest Transport and Road Research Laboratory CROWTHORNE, England

Motor Vehicle Related Fatalities 10-year Statistics for British Columbia Research and Data Unit Policy and Strategic Initiatives Branch

motor vehicle collisions

New Zealand Cycle Skills Review

Feasibility of Implementing International "Pedestrian Crosswalk" Laws in New Zealand Dr Glen Koorey & Courtney McCrostie University of Canterbury

Analyses and statistics on the frequency and the incidence of traffic accidents within Dolj County

Road Safety in 2016 Provisional Results

2017 North Texas Regional Bicycle Opinion Survey

Child Road Safety in Great Britain,

ROAD SAFETY ANNUAL REPORT 2018 ISRAEL

KC Scout Kansas City s Bi-State Transportation Management Center

Road Safety in Summary Report. French Road Safety Observatory. 26 June2017 Road Safety Results 2016

Transport Safety Action Plan

MEMORANDUM. City Constituents. Leilani Schwarcz, Vision Zero Surveillance Epidemiologist, SFDPH

Maine Highway Safety Facts 2016

Heavy Goods Vehicles and Buses

VEHICLE / PEDESTRIAN COLLISIONS

1 Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Victoria, RACV, 550 Princes Highway Noble Park, Victoria, 3174.

Traffic Safety Basic Facts 2008

City of Toronto Pedestrian Collision Study. Transportation Services Division Traffic Data Centre and Safety Bureau

Traffic Safety Basic Facts 2011

Road Safety Annual Report 2016 OECD/ITF Chapter 26. Morocco

Queensland s experience with speed limit reductions on Black Links

Tampa Bay. Pedestrian Safety Skills

North Carolina. Bicycle Crash Facts Prepared for

Sport & Active Recreation Regional Profile WELLINGTON REGION FINDINGS FROM THE 2013/14 ACTIVE NEW ZEALAND SURVEY

Traffic Collision Statistics Report

Documentation of statistics for Road Traffic Accidents 2014

Partners for Child Passenger Safety Fact and Trend Report October 2006

to both period for which data are available has been How Big is the Problem? 19 in Of these killed car occupants,

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

BASKETBALL. Sport & Active Recreation Profile FINDINGS FROM THE 2013/14 ACTIVE NEW ZEALAND SURVEY ACTIVE NEW ZEALAND SURVEY SERIES.

Walking in New Zealand May 2013

2 nd Road Safety PIN Conference 23 June 2008 Countdown to only two more years to act!

ROAD TRAFFIC INJURY DATA SYSTEMS IN GHANA: The key to safety improvement and control

Traffic Safety Basic Facts 2008

Auckland Transport Monthly Indicators Report 2018/19

Road Safety Annual Report 2016 OECD/ITF Chapter 31. Norway

A Critical Review of International Road Safety Databases

Transcription:

RRMasterton District Road Safety Report to 7 Performance Information Land Transport New Zealand - Wakefield Street PO Box 7 9 WELLINGTON Ph. () 9 89 Fax. () 9 899 Web: www.landtransport.govt.nz April 8

Blank pagecontents Page Introduction and general information Crash rates and costs (Figures. to.) 5 Crash counts (Figures. to.) 7 Road user statistics (Figures. to.8) 5 Crash type statistics (Figures. to.6) Crash factor statistics (Figures 5. to 5.) 7 Environmental statistics (Figures 6. to 6.) 57 Date and time statistics (Figures 7. to 7.) 67 Local road statistics (Figures 8. to 8.6) 7 Appendix Grouping of crash types Groupings of contributing factors

List of figures Crash rates and costs (pages 5 6) Fig.. Reporting rate serious injuries to hospital admissions Fig.. Crashes per million vehicle kilometres travelled Fig.. Casualties per million vehicle kilometres travelled Fig.. Peer group crash and casualty rates Group D Fig..5.8 Crashes per million vehicle kilometres travelled on: Urban local roads Group D Rural local roads Group D Urban state highways Group D Rural state highways Group D Fig..9 Crashes per, people (998 to 7) Fig.. Casualties per, people (998 to 7) Fig.. Social cost of crashes in Masterton District in 7 Crash counts (pages 7 ) Fig.. Crash numbers and severity ( to 7) whole city Fig..,. Crash numbers and severity ( to 7) urban/rural Fig.. Casualty numbers and severity ( to 7) whole city Fig..5,.6 Casualty numbers and severity ( to 7) urban/rural Fig..7 Number of injury crashes (998 to 7) all roads Fig..8 Number of casualties (998 to 7) all roads Fig..9 Number of injury crashes (998 to 7) urban Fig.. Number of casualties (998 to 7) urban Fig.. Number of injury crashes (998 to 7) rural Fig.. Number of casualties (998 to 7) rural Fig..,. Severity ratio (998 to 7) urban/rural Road user statistics (pages 5 ) Fig..,. Road user casualties ( to 7) urban/rural Fig..,. Male/female casualties (998 to 7) Fig..5 Male casualties by age ( to 7) Fig..6 Female casualties by age ( to 7) Fig..7,.8 Car/van driver casualties (998 to 7) Fig..9,. Car/van passenger casualties (998 to 7) Fig..,. Heavy vehicle casualties (998 to 7) Fig..,. Motorcyclist casualties (998 to 7) Fig..5,.6 Pedestrian casualties (998 to 7) Fig..7,.8 Cyclist casualties (998 to 7)

List of figures continued Road user statistics (pages 5 ) Fig..9 Car/van driver casualty age ( to 7) Fig.. Car/van passenger casualty age ( to 7) Fig.. Heavy vehicle casualty age ( to 7) Fig.. Motorcyclist casualty age ( to 7) Fig.. Pedestrian casualty age ( to 7) Fig.. Cyclist casualty age ( to 7) Fig..5,.6 Casualty ethnicity ( to 7) Fig..7,.8 Licence status (998 to 7) Crash type statistics (pages 6) Fig..,. Crash movement type ( to 7) Fig..,. Crash movement type trends (998 to 7) Fig..5 Failed to give way/stop urban (998 to 7) Fig..6 Bend lost control/head on rural (998 to 7) Crash factor statistics (pages 7 56) Fig. 5., 5. Contributing factors ( to 7) Fig. 5. 5.6 Contributing factor trends urban (998 to 7) Fig. 5.7 Alcohol-involved trend urban (998 to 7) Fig. 5.8 Speed-involved trend urban (998 to 7) Fig. 5.9 5. Contributing factor trends rural (998 to 7) Fig. 5. Alcohol-involved trend rural (998 to 7) Fig. 5. Speed-involved trend rural (998 to 7) Environmental statistics (pages 57 66) Fig. 6., 6. Crashes not on state highways (998 to 7) Fig. 6., 6. Intersection crashes (998 to 7) Fig. 6.5, 6.6 Wet road crashes (998 to 7) Fig. 6.7, 6.8 Crashes in darkness (998 to 7) Fig. 6.9 Unsealed road crashes rural (998 to 7) Fig. 6. Icy road crashes rural (998 to 7) Fig. 6., 6. Collisions with objects (998 to 7) Fig. 6., 6. Objects struck ( to 7) Date and time statistics (pages 67 7) Fig. 7. Time pattern over average week ( to 7) Fig. 7. Day of week ( to 7) Fig. 7. Month of year ( to 7)

List of figures continued Local road statistics (pages 7 86) Fig. 8. Number of injury crashes (998 to 7) all local roads Fig. 8. Number of casualties (998 to 7) all local roads Fig. 8. Number of injury crashes (998 to 7) urban local roads Fig. 8. Number of casualties (998 to 7) urban local roads Fig. 8.5 Number of injury crashes (998 to 7) rural local roads Fig. 8.6 Number of casualties (998 to 7) rural local roads Fig. 8.7, 8.8 Crash movement type local roads ( to 7) Fig. 8.9, 8. Crash movement type trends local roads (998 to 7) Fig. 8. Failed to give way/stop urban local roads (998 to 7) Fig. 8. Bend lost control/head on rural local roads (998 to 7) Fig. 8., 8. Contributing factors local roads ( to 7) Fig. 8.5, 8.6 Intersection crashes local roads (998 to 7) Fig. 8.7, 8.8 Wet road crashes local roads (998 to 7) Fig. 8.9, 8. Crashes in darkness local roads (998 to 7) Fig. 8. Unsealed road crashes rural local roads (998 to 7) Fig. 8. Icy road crashes rural local roads (998 to 7) Fig. 8., 8. Collisions with objects local roads (998 to 7) Fig. 8.5, 8.6 Objects struck local roads ( to 7)

Introduction and general information Land Transport New Zealand provides information on road safety to its stakeholders and the public. It also has responsibility for promoting safety and sustainability in land transport, among a variety of other functions. This road safety report is an example of information supplied by Land Transport New Zealand. This report helps identify road safety issues in Masterton District area ( the district ) by presenting tables or graphs of: numbers and trends in reported crashes and casualties characteristics and types of crashes and casualties factors contributing to crashes locations with bad crash records characteristics of crashes on local authority roads The information is intended to assist road controlling authorities, the New Zealand Police and others in evaluating the safety performance of the road network in Masterton District. Comparison with other cities, districts or regions elsewhere in the country is included. Researchers, students, and organisations with an interest in road safety will also find the information useful. Source of crash information This report uses data from Land Transport New Zealand s crash database. This database includes all crashes involving injury and non injury for which Police reports have been completed and forwarded to Land Transport New Zealand. Mostly five-year data ( to 7) has been used, but -year data (998 to 7) has been used to analyse trends. Local authority peer groups Traffic crash patterns and features for an area can depend on the traffic and roading characteristics of that area. The most useful comparisons are made with other areas or authorities with similar characteristics, rather than with the whole country. The data for the city is compared with a peer group of similar local authorities (Group D) along with data for all New Zealand. The peer group used for comparison with Masterton District is Group D which consists of provincial towns and hinterland. (Population - 75 and/or rural crashes greater than 55 percent). Local authorities included in this group are listed in Figure.. Introduction and general information

Definitions of urban and rural Data has been separated for urban and rural (open) roads through this report because each has a distinctly different pattern of crashes. In this report urban roads are defined as all those with a speed limit of 7 km/h or less. Definition of statistically significant A number of graphs include a comparison between the road controlling authority, all New Zealand and a similar peer group. These graphs can include an indication as to whether the difference is statistically significant. For the purposes of this report statistically significant means that a difference of this size is unlikely to be due to chance. Significance is noted at the 5% level (P <.5), this means that the observed result would occur by chance in only in similar situations. Road user compliance data The Ministry of Transport collects information on road user compliance with traffic law. This information includes speed surveys, occupant restraint use surveys and cycle helmet use surveys. Information about these surveys is available on Ministry of Transport web site. The appropriate web addresses are as follows: Open road speed Urban speed http://www.transport.govt.nz/speed/ http://www.transport.govt.nz/speed/ Safety belts Cycle helmets http://www.transport.govt.nz/belts-index/ http://www.transport.govt.nz/cycle-helmets-7-/ The information is also distributed quarterly in the Ministry of Transport publication Road safety progress. The Ministry of Transport also conducts public attitude surveys. These have been undertaken annually since 99. They evaluate attitudes to road safety issues, primarily alcohol-impaired driving and speed. Surveys are carried out in May and June of each year by trained interviewers who conduct interviews with respondents in their homes. The sample is chosen to be representative of the New Zealand adult population, and includes men and women aged 5 and over from towns, cities and rural areas throughout New Zealand. The results of these surveys are available from: http://www.transport.govt.nz/public-attitudes-index/ Introduction and general information

General explanatory notes. Crash and casualty information in this report generally includes data for both local roads and state highways. Some tables and charts can separate this information, however figures 8. 8.6 provide information for local roads only.. Crash and casualty rates are based on 7 populations estimates updated from the 6 census, traffic flows from the year 5, and the average of five year crash data ( 7).. Traffic flows are based on Road Asset Maintenance and Management (RAMM) data from December. Caution should be exercised when comparing traffic flow based crash rates in one authority with those of other authorities. Different road controlling authorities update flow data in RAMM at different times and some data will be more up to date than other data.. With four to five categories of road for each local authority, some categories will only have short lengths of road. This may cause significant variation in the calculated crash and casualty rates. 5. The crash numbers include all those within the road controlling authority. The crash numbers used in the crash rate section can, however, vary slightly from the remainder of the document as only on road crashes can be used. These are crashes on roads that have traffic volume information recorded. Crashes that occurred in car parks, reserves, beaches etc are excluded. 6. The severity of a crash is determined as the most severely injured casualty in the crash. Injury severity is classified as fatal, serious, or minor as follows: Fatal: Serious: Minor: Injuries that result in death within days of a crash. Fractures, concussion, internal injuries, crushing, severe cuts and lacerations, severe general shock necessitating medical treatment, and any injury involving removal to and detention in hospital. Injuries which are not serious but which require first aid, or cause discomfort or pain to the person injured, eg sprains and bruises. 7. Ethnicity of road users involved in crashes can now be recorded on traffic crash reports, although some reports may not include this data. Figures.5 and.6 shows the ethnicity of casualties, where known. Ethnicity is divided into five different groups. Only data for to 7 is available. The graph includes all casualties irrespective of culpability. NOTE: Ethnicity data should be treated with cautions as the data can be considered subjective and incomplete Introduction and general information

8. For the licence status grouping in Figures.7 and.8 the no/wrong licence group includes drivers who have never held a licence or have an expired or wrong class licence. This graph includes all drivers irrespective of injury or culpability. 9. See the appendix for detailed descriptions of: crash movement types and crash movement groupings (for Figures..) grouping of factors contributing to crashes and factors contributing to crashes (for Figures 5. 5.) Introduction and general information

Crash rates and costs 5 Crash rates and costs

6 Crash rates and costs

Crash reporting rates The ratio of reported serious injuries can be assessed by comparing seriously injured casualty numbers from Police crash reports to hospital admissions, given that a serious injury is generally one requiring hospital attention. Figure. below indicates the serious injury reporting rate for each region. Figure. Reporting rate serious injuries to hospital admissions Region Northland Auckland Waikato Bay of Plenty Gisborne Hawkes Bay Taranaki Manawatu-Wanganui Wellington Nelson-Marlborough West Coast Canterbury Otago Southland New Zealand 997 999 5 % 5% 5% 59% 68% 6% 6% 67% 67% 67% 58% 65% 69% 68% 75% 8% 5% 6% 6% 6% 5% 56% 56% 6% 55% 57% 65% 7% 7% 79% 69% 7% 75% 7% 7% 6% 67% 6% 6% 69% 6% 56% 65% 6% 7% 7% 67% 7% 68% 7% 58% 6% 7% 6% 7% 68% 69% 69% 68% 69% 6% 79% 79% 77% 8% 55% 68% 68% 6% 7% 6% 6% 67% 67% 7% These variations in reporting rates need to be considered when viewing the trends in crashes and casualties shown in this report. 7 Crash rates and costs

Figure. Crashes per million vehicle kilometres travelled Local roads State highways Urban Rural Urban Rural Masterton District 8 Group D 5 6 7 All NZ 6 6 6 Figure. Casualties per million vehicle kilometres travelled Local roads State highways Urban Rural Urban Rural Masterton District 9 6 7 6 Group D 5 5 7 6 All NZ 6 8 5 8 Crash rates and costs

Figure. Peer group crash and casualty rates Group D City or District name, Population (5 year average) Crashes per Casualties per million vehicle kilometres travelled Local State roads highways Urban Rural Urban Rural, Population (5 year average) million vehicle kilometres travelled Local State roads highways Ashburton 9 9 8 8 6 7 6 8 5 Far North 6 5 6 6 59 6 57 67 7 578 8 Franklin 6 7 7 9 58 9 6 76 Horowhenua 6 5 7 6 9 7 7 5 6 Manawatu 6 8 8 8 6 7 9 8 Marlborough 5 6 8 5 7 6 8 9 58 Masterton 6 8 7 9 6 7 6 Matamata-Piako 6 6 8 6 5 5 8 Rodney 5 6 7 8 5 97 69 Selwyn 5 6 5 8 7 8 6 9 South Taranaki 6 7 7 59 68 7 South Waikato 6 7 5 8 5 8 9 78 Southland 8 9 6 9 7 79 9 88 Tasman 5 9 8 6 9 6 8 6 8 8 6 7 Taupo 8 7 5 59 5 7 7 5 69 Thames Coromandel 6 7 8 8 8 8 68 6 Waikato 8 6 58 6 8 Waimakariri 6 9 5 7 Waipa 6 5 5 6 5 9 5 6 9 67 Waitaki 9 7 6 55 65 59 6 68 7 6 Western Bay of Plenty 7 9 8 7 9 85 Whakatane 5 5 65 8 5 9 75 7 Urban Rural Urban Rural 7 Population % of rural crashes Group D 7 6 6 6 5 6 5 8569 7 All New Zealand 5 6 6 6 6 6 8 5 77 Group D : Provincial towns and hinterland. (Population -75 and/or rural crashes greater than 55 percent) Crashes and casualties per million VKT are based on five years of reported injury on-road crash data (- 7) and December (5) VKT. Crashes and casualties per, population are based on five year average crash data (-7) and Statistics NZ 7 population estimates. 9 Crash rates and costs

Figure.5 Crashes per million vehicle-kilometres travelled - urban local roads Southland Waitaki Franklin Matamata-Piako Marlborough Far North South Taranaki Waikato Masterton Tasman Taupo All New Zealand Waipa Ashburton Western Bay of Plenty Manawatu Group D Waimakariri South Waikato Rodney Whakatane Horowhenua Thames Coromandel Selwyn 5 6 7 8 9 Crashes per million vkt Crash rates and costs

Figure.6 Crashes per million vehicle-kilometres travelled - rural local roads Far North Waikato South Waikato Southland Rodney South Taranaki Franklin Waitaki All New Zealand Waipa Masterton Taupo Group D Manawatu Waimakariri Western Bay of Plenty Whakatane Matamata-Piako Tasman Marlborough Thames Coromandel Selwyn Ashburton Horowhenua 5 5 5 5 Crashes per million vkt Crash rates and costs

Figure.7 Crashes per million vehicle kilometres travelled - urban state highways Whakatane Waitaki Southland Far North Masterton Horowhenua Marlborough All New Zealand Waimakariri Manawatu Thames Coromandel Matamata-Piako Tasman Waipa Group D Selwyn Taupo Rodney Ashburton South Taranaki South Waikato Western Bay of Plenty Waikato Franklin 5 6 7 Crashes per million vkt Crash rates and costs

Figure.8 Crashes per million vehicle-kilometres travelled - rural state highways Far North Masterton Southland South Taranaki Waitaki Marlborough Tasman Whakatane South Waikato Horowhenua Western Bay of Plenty All New Zealand Group D Matamata-Piako Taupo Waipa Waikato Manawatu Rodney Selwyn Waimakariri Franklin Thames Coromandel Ashburton 5 5 5 5 Crashes per million vkt Crash rates and costs

Figure.9 Crashes per, people Masterton District 5 Crashes per, people 5 5 5 5 7 7 6 5 998 999 5 6 7 All NZ Masterton Group D 6 Figure. Casualties per, people Masterton District Casualties per, people 5 6 8 7 6 998 999 5 6 7 All NZ Masterton Group D Crash rates and costs

Figure. Social cost of crashes in Masterton District in 7 Local roads State highways Total urban rural urban rural Masterton District $6.75 $. $.7 $. $.5 New Zealand $,69.8 $89.7 $.6 $,5. $,57.8 Note: Crash costs are in $ millions The social costs of a road crash and the associated injuries include a number of different elements: Loss of life and life quality Loss of output due to temporary incapacitation Medical costs Legal costs Property damage costs The average value of a loss of life due to a road crash is estimated by the amount of money the New Zealand population would be willing to pay for a safety improvement that would result in the expected avoidance of one premature death. This is the willingness to pay based value of statistical life or VOSL. The VOSL was established at $ million in 99. This has been indexed to the average hourly earnings (ordinary time) to express the value in current dollars. The updated VOSL is $.9 million (in June 7 dollars). Based on several international and New Zealand studies on VOSL, the average loss of life quality for permanent impairments due to a serious and a minor injury were estimated to be % and.% of the VOSL respectively. Crash rates can vary due to reporting rates. These are adjusted on a regional basis in this report by comparing with hospitalisation rates. The other social cost components are estimated based on a number of studies conducted during the early to mid-99s and are updated for price changes by indexing to an appropriate price index. For a detail discussion on this, please refer to The social cost of road crashes and injuries: June 7 update, available at the Ministry of Transport s website: http://www.transport.govt.nz/socialcost/social-cost-june-7-update[].pdf The average social cost per reported crash (in June 7 dollars) are estimated at: Rural fatal crash $,6, Rural serious crash $75, Rural minor crash $88, Urban fatal crash $,59, Urban serious crash $66, Urban minor crash $79, These values include an allowance for non-reported injury crashes, and the totals in Fig.. also include an allowance for non injury crashes. 5 Crash rates and costs

6 Crash rates and costs

Crash counts 7 Crash counts

8 Crash counts

Figure.: Crash numbers and severity to 7 - whole District 5 6 7 Total % Group D Fatal crashes % 6% Serious crashes 9 55 7% % Minor crashes 8 59 6 7 6 79% 7% Total injury crashes 6 57 7 75 6 8 % % Non-injury crashes 5 5 6 6 7 Figure.: Crash numbers and severity to 7 - urban roads 5 6 7 Total % Group D Fatal crashes % % Serious crashes 6 7 5 7 8 % 9% Minor crashes 6 65 85% 78% Total injury crashes 5 8 95 % % Non-injury crashes 86 6 9 8 6 565 Figure.: Crash numbers and severity to 7 - rural roads 5 6 7 Total % Group D Fatal crashes 8% 7% Serious crashes 6 7 7 5 7 % % Minor crashes 9 6 6 95 7% 69% Total injury crashes 5 6 5 % % Non-injury crashes 8 9 6 8 7 8 Figure.: Casualty numbers and severity to 7 - whole District 5 6 7 Total % Group D Fatal casualties 5 % 5% Serious casualties 7 7 69 6% % Minor casualties 7 6 7 8 65 55 8% 75% Total casualties 95 77 86 96 8 8 % % Figure.5: Casualty numbers and severity to 7 - urban roads 5 6 7 Total % Group D Fatal casualties % % Serious casualties 6 8 5 9 % 7% Minor casualties 9 8 86% 8% Total casualties 8 5 5 5 % % Figure.6: Casualty numbers and severity to 7 - rural roads 5 6 7 Total % Group D Fatal casualties 5 6% 5% Serious casualties 8 7 8 8 9% % Minor casualties 7 7 75% 7% Total casualties 7 5 97 % % 9 Crash counts

Figure.7 Number of injury crashes Masterton District all roads (urban & rural) 8 7 6 55 59 59 6 6 57 7 75 6 No. of crashes 5 7 Minor Serious Fatal 998 999 5 6 7 Figure.8 Number of casualties Masterton District all roads (urban & rural) 95 96 No. of casualties 8 6 77 8 87 77 79 77 86 8 Minor Serious Fatal 998 999 5 6 7 Crash counts

6 Figure.9 Number of injury crashes Masterton District - urban 5 9 5 No. of crashes 5 8 Minor Serious Fatal 998 999 5 6 7 6 5 5 Figure. Number of casualties Masterton District - urban 57 5 8 5 5 5 No. of casualties 8 Minor Serious Fatal 998 999 5 6 7 Crash counts

Figure. Number of injury crashes Masterton District - rural 5 5 No. of crashes 5 7 6 5 6 Minor Serious Fatal 5 5 998 999 5 6 7 Figure. Number of casualties Masterton District - rural 6 5 5 5 7 No. of casualties 9 9 Minor Serious Fatal 998 999 5 6 7 Crash counts

% Figure. Severity ratio - urban Masterton District 5% % of all injury crashes % 5% % 5% % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: This graph depicts the percentage of serious injury crashes (including those which resulted in death) to all injury crashes. All NZ Masterton Group D 5% Figure. Severity ratio - rural Masterton District 5% % % of all injury crashes 5% % 5% % 5% % 5% % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: This graph depicts the percentage of serious injury crashes (including those which resulted in death) to all injury crashes. All NZ Masterton Group D Crash counts

Crash counts

Road user statistics 5 Road user statistics

6 Road user statistics

Figure. Road user casualties - urban Masterton District (-7) Pedestrians Cyclists M/cyclists Heavy vehicles 7 6 Group D Masterton All NZ Car/van passengers 7 Car/van drivers % % % % % 5% 6% % of urban casualties Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of casualties is shown against the data points. Denotes statistically significant difference between Local Authority and National or Peer Group Proportions Figure. Road user casualties - rural Masterton District (-7) Pedestrians Cyclists M/cyclists Heavy vehicles 5 Group D Masterton All NZ Car/van passengers 5 Car/van drivers 9 % % % % % 5% 6% 7% % of rural casualties Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of casualties is shown against the data points. Denotes statistically significant difference between Local Authority and National or Peer Group Proportions 7 Road user statistics

Figure. Male/female casualties - urban Masterton District 5 5 No. of casualties 5 5 6 6 6 9 5 6 9 8 7 7 Male Female 5 998 999 5 6 7 Note: This graph shows the number of male and female roadusers injured. Figure. Male/female casualties - rural Masterton District 7 5 No. of casualties 5 5 7 5 8 7 5 7 6 5 9 Male Female 5 998 999 5 6 7 Note: This graph shows the number of male and female roadusers injured. 8 Road user statistics

Figure.5 Male casualties by age Masterton District (-7) 5% 6 % % of male casualties 5% % 5% 5 7 5 7 8 9 7 6 7 6 % < 5 5-9 5-9 - - 5-9 - 5-9 - 5-9 6-6 55-59 5-5 8+ 75-79 7-7 65-69 Age (years) Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of casualties is shown against the data points. The graph plots the percentage of Roaduser Casualties by age. All NZ Masterton Group D Figure.6 Female casualties by age Masterton District (-7) % 5% % of female casualties % 5% % 5% % < 5 5-9 5-9 - - 5-9 - 5-9 - 5-9 6-6 55-59 5-5 8+ 75-79 7-7 65-69 Age (years) Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of casualties is shown against the data points. The graph plots the percentage of Roaduser Casualties by age. All NZ Masterton Group D 9 Road user statistics

Figure.7 Car/van driver casualties Masterton District 7% 5 % of all casualties 6% 5% % 7 % % 8 9 6 8 5 % % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of casualties is shown against the data points All NZ Masterton Group D Figure.8 Car/van driver casualties Masterton District 6 5 9 5 8 No. of casualties 7 8 6 5 998 999 5 6 7 Note: Dotted line represents the ten year trend line Road user statistics

Figure.9 Car/van passenger casualties Masterton District % 5% % 5 % of all casualties 5% % 5% 7 5 % 5% % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of casualties is shown against the data points. All NZ Masterton Group D Figure. Car/van passenger casualties Masterton District 5 No. of casualties 5 5 5 7 5 5 998 999 5 6 7 Note: Dotted line represents the ten year trend line Road user statistics

Figure. Heavy vehicle casualties Masterton District 6% 5% % of all casualties % % % % % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of casualties is shown against the data points. All NZ Masterton Group D Figure. Heavy vehicle casualties Masterton District 5 No. of casualties 998 999 5 6 7 Note: Dotted line represents the ten year trend line Road user statistics

% 8% Figure. Motorcyclist casualties Masterton District 6 6% % % of all casualties % % 8% 6% 9 7 5 7 6 6 % % % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of casualties is shown against the data points. All NZ Masterton Group D 8 6 Figure. Motorcyclist casualties Masterton District 6 No. of casualties 8 6 9 7 5 7 6 6 998 999 5 6 7 Note: Dotted line represents the ten year trend line Road user statistics

Figure.5 Pedestrian casualties Masterton District % % 7 % of all casualties 8% 6% % 6 6 5 % % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of casualties is shown against the data points. All NZ Masterton Group D Figure.6 Pedestrian casualties Masterton District No. of casualties 8 6 7 6 6 5 998 999 5 6 7 Note: Dottedline represents the ten year trend line Road user statistics

Figure.7 Cyclist casualties Masterton District % 8% 6% % % of all casualties % % 8% 6% 8 9 7 7 7 7 9 % % % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of casualties is shown against the data points. All NZ Masterton Group D 6 Figure.8 Cyclist casualties Masterton District No. of casualties 8 6 8 9 7 7 7 7 9 998 999 5 6 7 Note: Dotted line represents the ten year trend line 5 Road user statistics

Figure.9 Car/van driver casualty age Masterton District (-7) 5% % of car/van driver casualties % 5% % 5% % 6 5 6 7 5 6 7 7 7 < 5 5-9 - 5-9 - 5-9 - 5-9 - 5-9 5-5 55-59 6-6 65-69 7-7 8+ 75-79 Age (years) Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of casualties is shown against the data points. The population line show the age distribution for the TLA being analysed. All NZ Masterton Group D Population 5% Figure. Car/van passenger casualty age Masterton District (-7) % of car/van passenger casualties % 5% % 5% % 5% % 6 9 6 5 < 5 5-9 - 5-9 - 5-9 - 5-9 - 5-9 55-59 5-5 6-6 65-69 7-7 75-79 8+ Age (years) Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of casualties is shown against the data points. The population line shows the age distribution for the TLA being analysed. All NZ Masterton Group D Population 6 Road user statistics

Figure. Heavy vehicle casualty age Masterton District (-7) % % of heavy vehicle casualties 5% % 5% % 5% % < 5 5-9 - 5-9 - 5-9 - 5-9 - 5-9 5-5 55-59 6-6 65-69 7-7 8+ 75-79 Age (years) Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of casualties is shown against the data points. The population line shows the age distribution for the TLA being analysed. All NZ Masterton Group D Population Figure. Motorcyclist casualty age Masterton District (-7) 5% % of motorcyclist casualties % 5% % 5% % 5% % 5 6 < 5 5-9 - 5-9 - 5-9 - 5-9 - 5-9 5-5 55-59 6-6 65-69 7-7 75-79 8+ Age (years) Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of casualties is shown against the data points. The population line shows the age distribution for the TLA being analysed. All NZ Masterton Group D Population 7 Road user statistics

5% Figure. Pedestrian casualty age Masterton District (-7) 7 % of pedestrian casualties % 5% % 6 5% % < 5 5-9 - 5-9 - 5-9 - 5-9 - 5-9 5-5 55-59 6-6 65-69 7-7 75-79 8+ Age (years) Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of casualties is shown against the data points. The population line shows the age distribution for the TLA being analysed. All NZ Masterton Group D Population Figure. Cyclist casualty age Masterton District (-7) % % of cyclist casualties 5% % 5% % 9 7 5 5% % < 5 5-9 - 5-9 - 5-9 - 5-9 - 5-9 5-5 55-59 6-6 65-69 7-7 75-79 8+ Age (years) Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of casualties is shown against the data points. The population line shows the age distribution for the TLA being analysed. All NZ Masterton Group D Population 8 Road user statistics

Figure.5 Casualty ethnicity - urban Masterton District (-7) Other Asian Pacific Islander Group D Masterton All NZ Maori 7 European 6 % % % % % 5% 6% 7% % of all casualties Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. Denotes statistically significant difference between Local Authority and National or Peer Group Proportions Figure.6 Casualty ethnicity - rural Masterton District (-7) Other Asian Pacific Islander Group D Masterton All NZ Maori 5 European 8 % % % % % 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% % of all casualties Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. Denotes statistically significant difference between Local Authority and National or Peer Group Proportions 9 Road user statistics

Figure.7 Licence status - urban Masterton District 8% % of all drivers involved in injury crashes 7% 6% 5% % % % % % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: This graph shows drivers by licence status as % of all drivers involved in injury crashes. Learner/Restricted No/Wrong Licence Forbidden/Disqualified Full Licence Unknown Overseas Figure.8 Licence status - rural Masterton District 9% 8% % of all drivers involved in injury crashes 7% 6% 5% % % % % % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: This graph shows drivers by licence status as % of all drivers involved in injury crashes. Learner/Restricted No/Wrong Licence Forbidden/Disqualified Full Licence Unknown Overseas Road user statistics

Crash type statistics Crash type statistics

Crash type statistics

Figure. Crash movement type - urban Masterton District (-7) Overtaking 8 Pedestrian vs vehicle Crossing / Turning 65 Rear end / obstruction 8 Group D Masterton All NZ Bend -lost control/head on Straight -lost control/head on Miscellaneous % 5% % 5% % 5% % 5% % of urban crashes Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. Denotes statistically significant difference between Local Authority and National or Peer Group Proportions Figure. Crash movement type - rural Masterton District roads (-7) Overtaking 9 Pedestrian vs vehicle Crossing / Turning 9 Rear end / obstruction Bend -lost control/head on 9 8 Group D Masterton All NZ Straight -lost control/head on Miscellaneous % % % % % 5% 6% 7% % of rural crashes Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. Denotes statistically significant difference between Local Authority and National or Peer Group Proportions Crash type statistics

Figure. Crash movement type - trends Masterton District - urban roads 8 6 No. of crashes 8 6 998 999 5 6 7 Overtaking Straight -lost control/head on Bend -lost control/head on Rear end / obstruction Crossing / Turning Pedestrian vs vehicle Figure. Crash movement type - trends Masterton District - rural roads 5 No. of crashes 5 5 998 999 5 6 7 Overtaking Straight -lost control/head on Bend -lost control/head on Rear end / obstruction Crossing / Turning Pedestrian vs vehicle Crash type statistics

Figure.5 Failed to give way / stop Masterton District - urban roads 6% 8 5% 7 % of urban crashes failed to give way/stop % % % 8 6 6 5 6 % % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ Masterton Group D Figure.6 Bend - lost control / head - on Masterton District - rural roads 8% 7 6 % of rural crashes bend/lost control/head on 7% 6% 5% % % 5 6 5 % % % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ Masterton Group D 5 Crash type statistics

6 Crash type statistics

69 Crash factor statistics 7 Crash factor statistics

8 Crash factor statistics

Poor judgement Poor observation Incorrect lanes/position Failed to keep left Failed to g.w./stop Alcohol involved 69 Weather Road factors Vehicle factors Cyclist factors Pedestrian factors Disabled/old/ill Fatigue Poor handling Over-taking Too fast 7 9 5 9 7 Figure 5. Contributing factors - urban Masterton District (-7) 9 8 9 8 5 % % % % % 5% 6% % of urban crashes Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. Denotes statistically significant difference between Local Authority and National or Peer Group Proportions 68 95 Group D Masterton All NZ Figure 5. Contributing factors - rural Masterton District (-7) Weather Road factors Vehicle factors Cyclist factors Pedestrian factors Disabled/old/ill Fatigue Poor judgement Poor observation Poor handling Incorrect lanes/position Over-taking 5 8 9 7 8 7 Group D Masterton All NZ Failed to keep left Failed to g.w./stop Too fast Alcohol involved 7 5 6 % 5% % 5% % 5% % 5% % % of rural crashes Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of casualties is shown against the data points. Denotes statistically significant difference between Local Authority and National or Peer Group Proportions 9 Crash factor statistics

Figure 5. Contributing factor trends Masterton District - urban roads 8 6 No. of urban crashes 8 6 998 999 5 6 7 Alcohol involved Too fast Failed to g.w./stop Fatigue Figure 5. Contributing factor trends Masterton District - urban roads 5 No. of urban crashes 5 5 998 999 5 6 7 Poor observation Poor judgement Pedestrian factors Road factors 5 Crash factor statistics

Figure 5.5 Contributing factor trends Masterton District - urban roads 7 6 No. of urban crashes 5 998 999 5 6 7 Cyclist factors Incorrect lanes/position Vehicle factors Failed to keep left 9 8 7 Figure 5.6 Contributing factor trends Masterton District - urban roads No. of urban crashes 6 5 998 999 5 6 7 Poor handling Over-taking Disabled/old/ill Weather 5 Crash factor statistics

Figure 5.7 Alcohol involved trend Masterton District - urban roads % % of urban crashes involving alcohol 8% 6% % % % 8% 6% % % 5 7 6 % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ Masterton Group D Figure 5.8 Speed involved trend Masterton District - urban roads % % of urban crashes involving speed 8% 6% % % % 8% 6% % 7 5 % % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ Masterton Group D 5 Crash factor statistics

Figure 5.9 Contributing factor trends Masterton District - rural roads No. of rural crashes 8 6 998 999 5 6 7 Alcohol involved Too fast Road factors Fatigue 6 Figure 5. Contributing factor trends Masterton District - rural roads No. of rural crashes 8 6 998 999 5 6 7 Failed to g.w./stop Poor handling Poor judgement Failed to keep left 5 Crash factor statistics

Figure 5. Contributing factor trends Masterton District - rural roads 7 6 No. of rural crashes 5 998 999 5 6 7 Vehicle factors Incorrect lanes/position Poor observation Over-taking Figure 5. Contributing factor trends Masterton District - rural roads No. of rural crashes 998 999 5 6 7 Weather Disabled/old/ill Pedestrian factors Cyclist factors 5 Crash factor statistics

Figure 5. Alcohol involved trend Masterton District - rural roads 5% % of rural crashes involving alcohol % 5% % 5% % 5% 5 5 % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ Masterton Group D 6% Figure 5. Speed involved trend Masterton District - rural roads % of rural crashes Involving speed 5% % % % 6 6 5 7 7 9 5 7 8 % % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ Masterton Group D 55 Crash factor statistics

56 Crash factor statistics

69 Environmental statistics 57 Environmental statistics

58 Environmental statistics

Figure 6. Crashes not on state highways Masterton District - urban roads % of urban crashes not on state highways 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% % % % % 5 8 8 6 7 69 % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ Masterton Group D Figure 6. Crashes not on state highways Masterton District - rural roads % of rural crashes not on state highways 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% % % % % 6 9 9 % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. 7 7 8 9 All NZ Masterton Group D 59 Environmental statistics

Figure 6. Intersection crashes Masterton District - urban roads % of urban crashes at intersections 6% 5% % % % % 5 7 7 % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ Masterton Group D 5% Figure 6. Intersection crashes Masterton District - rural roads 6 % of rural crashes at intersections % 5% % 5% 5 5 5 % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ Masterton Group D 6 Environmental statistics

Figure 6.5 Wet road crashes Masterton District - urban roads % 5% % of urban crashes on wet roads % 5% % 5% % 7 9 9 6 9 8 6 7 5% % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ Masterton Group D Figure 6.6 Wet road crashes Masterton District - rural roads 5% 8 % of rural crashes on wet roads % 5% % 5% % 5% 7 7 7 % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ Masterton Group D 6 Environmental statistics

Figure 6.7 Crashes in darkness Masterton District - urban roads % % of urban crashes in darkness 5% % 5% % 5% % 6 7 6 9 9 9 8 5% % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ Masterton Group D Figure 6.8 Crashes in darkness Masterton District - rural roads 5% % of rural crashes in darkness % 5% % 5% % 5% % 5 7 8 5 7 9 5 5% % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ Masterton Group D 6 Environmental statistics

Figure 6.9 Unsealed road crashes Masterton District - rural roads % of rural crashes on unsealed roads % 8% 6% % % % 8% 6% % % % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ Masterton Group D 9% Figure 6. Icy road crashes Masterton District - rural roads 8% % of rural crashes on icy roads 7% 6% 5% % % % % % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ Masterton Group D 6 Environmental statistics

Figure 6. Collisions with objects Masterton District - urban roads % urban collisions involving fixed objects 5% % 9 8 5% % 5% 7 % 7 5% % 5% % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ Masterton Group D Figure 6. Collisions with objects Masterton District - rural roads % rural collisions involving fixed objects 9% 9 9 8% 7 8 5 7% 5 5 6% 5% % % % % % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ Masterton Group D 6 Environmental statistics

Figure 6. Objects struck - urban Masterton District (-7) Ditch Trees 9 Roadworks Poles 8 Other Parked vehicle Island/sign/kerb Guardrail Fence/building Over bank Cliff/bank 9 Group D Masterton All NZ Bridge Animals % % % 6% 8% % % % of urban crashes Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. Denotes statistically significant difference between Local Authority and National or Peer Group Proportions Figure 6. Objects struck - rural Masterton District (-7) Ditch Trees 5 6 Roadworks Poles 8 Other Parked vehicle Island/sign/kerb Guardrail Fence/building Over bank Cliff/bank Bridge Animals 9 9 8 Group D Masterton All NZ % 5% % 5% % 5% % % of rural crashes Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. Denotes statistically significant difference between Local Authority and National or Peer Group Proportions 65 Environmental statistics

66 Environmental statistics

69 Date and time statistics 67 Date and time statistics

68 Date and time statistics

Figure 7. Time pattern over average week Masterton District (-7).5%.%.5% 69 Date and time statistics Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday All NZ Masterton Group D.%.5%.% % of Total Crashes Masterton District Road Safety Report -7

Figure 7. Day of week (6 a.m. to 6 a.m.) Masterton District (-7) 5% 7 % of total crashes % 5% % 5 55 5 7 7 5% % Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday 69 Day Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. Denotes statistically significant difference between Local Authority and National or Peer Group Proportions Group D Masterton All NZ Figure 7. Month of year Masterton District (-7) % of total crashes % % 8% 6% % % 9 7 9 % Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Month Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. Denotes statistically significant difference between Local Authority and National or Peer Group Proportions Group D Masterton All NZ 7 Date and time statistics

69 Local road statistics 7 Local road statistics

7 Local road statistics

6 Figure 8. Number of injury crashes Masterton District - local roads (urban & rural) 5 No. of crashes 5 5 7 7 7 7 6 Minor Serious Fatal 998 999 5 6 7 7 6 6 Figure 8. Number of casualties Masterton District - local roads (urban & rural) 55 6 6 5 6 6 6 6 6 No. of casualties 5 Minor Serious Fatal 998 999 5 6 7 7 Local road statistics

Figure 8. Number of injury crashes Masterton District - urban local roads 5 No. of crashes 5 5 8 8 6 7 Minor Serious Fatal 5 5 998 999 5 6 7 Figure 8. Number of casualties Masterton District - urban local roads 5 9 5 6 5 8 No. of casualties 5 5 Minor Serious Fatal 5 998 999 5 6 7 7 Local road statistics

Figure 8.5 Number of injury crashes Masterton District - rural local roads 5 No. of crashes 5 6 9 9 7 7 8 9 Minor Serious Fatal 5 998 999 5 6 7 Figure 8.6 Number of casualties Masterton District - rural local roads 5 5 No. of casualties 5 5 6 5 5 8 Minor Serious Fatal 5 998 999 5 6 7 75 Local road statistics

Figure 8.7 Crash movement type - urban Masterton District local roads (-7) Overtaking 6 Pedestrian vs vehicle Crossing / Turning Rear end / obstruction Bend -lost control/head on 7 5 Group D LR Masterton LR All NZ LR Straight -lost control/head on 8 Miscellaneous % 5% % 5% % 5% % 5% % of urban crashes Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. Denotes statistically significant difference between Local Authority and National or Peer Group Proportions Figure 8.8 Crash movement type - rural Masterton District local roads (-7) Overtaking 6 Pedestrian vs vehicle Crossing / Turning Rear end / obstruction 5 Group D LR Masterton LR All NZ LR Bend -lost control/head on 6 Straight -lost control/head on 5 Miscellaneous % % % % % 5% 6% 7% 8% % of rural crashes Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. Denotes statistically significant difference between Local Authority and National or Peer Group Proportions 76 Local road statistics

Figure 8.9 Crash movement type - Trends Masterton District - urban local roads No. of crashes 8 6 998 999 5 6 7 Overtaking Straight -lost control/head on Bend -lost control/head on Rear end / obstruction Crossing / Turning Pedestrian vs vehicle 8 6 Figure 8. Crash movement type - Trends Masterton District - rural local roads No. of crashes 8 6 998 999 5 6 7 Overtaking Straight -lost control/head on Bend -lost control/head on Rear end / obstruction Crossing / Turning Pedestrian vs vehicle 77 Local road statistics

Figure 8. Failed to give way/stop Masterton District - urban local roads 5% 5% % of urban crashes failed to give way/stop % 5% % 5% % 6 7 9 9 9 5% % 5% % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ LR Masterton LR Group D LR Figure 8. Bend - lost control / head - on Masterton District - rural local roads % of rural crashes bend/lost control/head on 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% % % 9 9 9 8 9 7 5 % % % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ LR Masterton LR Group D LR 78 Local road statistics

Figure 8. Contributing factors - urban Masterton District local roads (-7) Weather Road factors Vehicle factors Cyclist factors 5 Pedestrian factors Disabled/old/ill Fatigue Poor judgement Poor observation Poor handling Incorrect lanes/position Over-taking 7 6 Group D LR Masterton LR All NZ LR Failed to keep left Failed to g.w./stop Too fast 5 9 9 Alcohol involved 7 % % % % % 5% % of urban crashes Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. Denotes statistically significant difference between Local Authority and National or Peer Group Proportions Figure 8. Contributing factors - rural Masterton District local roads (-7) Weather Road factors Vehicle factors Cyclist factors Pedestrian factors 7 5 Disabled/old/ill Fatigue Poor judgement Poor observation Poor handling Incorrect lanes/position Over-taking 7 5 8 Group D LR Masterton LR All NZ LR Failed to keep left Failed to g.w./stop 6 Too fast Alcohol involved % 5% % 5% % 5% % 5% % 5% % of rural crashes Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of casualties is shown against the data points. Denotes statistically significant difference between Local Authority and National or Peer Group Proportions 79 Local road statistics

Figure 8.5 Intersection crashes Masterton District - urban local roads 6% 6 % urban crashes at intersections 5% % % % % 9 9 7 % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ LR Masterton LR Group D LR Figure 8.6 Intersection crashes Masterton District - rural local roads 5% % rural crashes at intersections % 5% % 5% % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ LR Masterton LR Group D LR 8 Local road statistics

Figure 8.7 Wet road crashes Masterton District - urban local roads % % urban crashes on wet roads 5% % 5% % 5% % 9 6 6 6 6 5% % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ LR Masterton LR Group D LR Figure 8.8 Wet road crashes Masterton District - rural local roads % of rural crashes on wet roads % 7 6 5% % 5 5% % 5% % 5% % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ LR Masterton LR Group D LR 8 Local road statistics

% Figure 8.9 Crashes in darkness Masterton District - urban local roads % urban crashes in darkness 5% % 5% % 5% % 5 6 7 9 8 6 6 5% % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ LR Masterton LR Group D LR Figure 8. Crashes in darkness Masterton District - rural local roads 5% 5% 8 8 % rural crashes in darkness % 5% % 5% % 5% 6 7 5 5 7 % 5% % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ LR Masterton LR Group D LR 8 Local road statistics

Figure 8. Crashes on unsealed roads Masterton District - rural local roads % rural crashes on unsealed roads % 5% % 5% % 5% % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ LR Masterton LR Group D LR Figure 8. Icy road crashes Masterton District - rural local roads % % rural crashes on icy roads 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% % % % % % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ LR Masterton LR Group D LR 8 Local road statistics

Figure 8. Collisions with objects Masterton District - urban local roads % urban crashes involving fixed objects 5% 5% % 5% % 5% % 5% % 5% 9 5 9 9 5 6 % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ LR Masterton LR Group D LR Figure 8. Collisions with objects Masterton District - rural local roads 9% % rural crashes involving fixed objects 8% 7% 6% 5% % % % % 7 5 % 998 999 5 6 7 Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. All NZ LR Masterton LR Group D LR 8 Local road statistics

Figure 8.5 Objects struck - urban Masterton District local roads (-7) Ditch Trees 9 Roadworks Poles Other 7 Parked vehicle Island/sign/kerb Guardrail 8 Group D LR Masterton LR All NZ LR Fence/building Over bank 8 Cliff/bank Bridge Animals % % % 6% 8% % % % % of urban crashes Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. Denotes statistically significant difference between Local Authority and National or Peer Group Proportions Figure 8.6 Objects struck - rural Masterton District local roads (-7) Ditch Trees Roadworks Poles 7 Other Parked vehicle Island/sign/kerb Guardrail Fence/building Over bank 5 5 Group D LR Masterton LR All NZ LR Cliff/bank Bridge Animals 7 7 % 5% % 5% % 5% % % of rural crashes Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points. Denotes statistically significant difference between Local Authority and National or Peer Group Proportions 85 Local road statistics