Benefit of ESTCP/SERDP Research Program on Underwater Explosive Safety

Similar documents
Use of a low power, airgun sound source to accurately determine sound. Transmission Loss characteristics at the proposed Robin Rigg. Windfarm site.

Caltrans compendium of underwater sound data from pile driving 2014 update

Description of Underwater Noise Attenuation System Design Unit 2. New NY Bridge Project

Chapter 20.0 Marine Noise and Vibration

Janek LAANEARU and Aleksander KLAUSON Department of Mechanics, Tallinn University of Technology

Underwater noise and offshore windfarms

Assessment of cumulative Sound Exposure Levels (SEL) for marine piling events

SR 411, Lexington Bridge Underwater Noise Monitoring Results

Underwater Sound Level Report: I-90 Keechelus Lake Avalanche Bridge Blasting

Final Report: Measurements of Pile Driving Noise from Control Piles and Noise-Reduced Piles at the Vashon Island Ferry Dock

I. Monitoring and Adaptive Management Approach. Potential Effects, Monitoring Studies & Mitigation

2016 International Perforating Symposium May Galveston, Texas

The broadband acoustic output of marine seismic airgun sources"

PRINCIPAL UNDERWATER NOISE SOURCES IN BALTIC SEA AND METRICS USED IN NOISE LEVEL ASSESSMENT

Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

ARA PROJECT Prepared by: Peter T. Dzwilewski Applied Research Associates, Inc Shaffer Parkway Littleton, Colorado 80127

The operational phase will result in noise from operational vessel movements.

SEISMIC SURVEY GREENLAND 2014 Underwater sound propagation for North East Greenland offshore seismic survey

UNDERWATER SOUND LEVELS ASSOCIATED WITH PILE DRIVING AT THE CAPE DISAPPOINTMENT BOAT LAUNCH FACILITY, WAVE BARRIER PROJECT

High Frequency Acoustical Propagation and Scattering in Coastal Waters

Vieques Munitions Response: Current Issues

Final. Technical Guidance for Assessment and Mitigation of the Hydroacoustic Effects of Pile Driving on Fish

Review of new information on pollution, underwater sound and disturbance: Military, including munitions

WESTHAVEN MARINA EXTENSION ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT Rp December 2017

MEASUREMENT OF LONG-TERM AMBIENT NOISE AND TIDAL TURBINE LEVELS IN THE BAY OF FUNDY

Introduction. o 2. ! "#$ % & ' (" 4 Watt/m 2. Major

The Impact of Offshore Wind Turbines on Underwater Ambient Noise Levels. Stewart Glegg Center for Acoustics and Vibration Florida Atlantic University

Appendix H. Modelling and Measurement of Underwater Noise (Subacoustech, 2008)

Fine-Scale Survey of Right and Humpback Whale Prey Abundance and Distribution

Appendix G: Underwater Acoustics

Measurement of underwater noise arising from marine aggregate operations

Monitoring Factsheet: Underwater Noise

Effect on Marine Life by Noise of Offshore Wind Farm S.JIANG 1 & J.P. HOU 1

Unalaska Navigation Channel Improvements

Final Report. Prepared By: Alexander G. Soloway Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Species and Area Protection with Regards to Offshore Wind Farms. Dr. Folchert R. van Dijken

Introduction to Underwater Acoustics Simulator. Poul Kronborg Product Area Owner, Marine MIKE Software Products DHI

Measurements of underwater noise in the Arun River during piling at County Wharf, Littlehampton

Marine Mammal Mitigation Systems

Tel: +44 (0) Tel: +44 (0) Fax: +44 (0) Fax: +44 (0)

Measured broadband reverberation characteristics in Deep Ocean. [E.Mail: ]

Evidence of Anton van Helden in the matter of the applications by Trans Tasman Resources Limited for marine and discharge consents to recover iron

Physics 101 Lecture 20 Waves & Sound

Experiment and Analysis of the Response of Fish to Frequencies

CHAPTER 6 DISCUSSION ON WAVE PREDICTION METHODS

PROVISIONS FOR REDUCTION OF NOISE FROM COMMERCIAL SHIPPING AND ITS ADVERSE IMPACTS ON MARINE LIFE. Report of the Correspondence Group

Mine Clearance Vehicles Crew Safety Standard

Sea State Analysis. Topics. Module 7 Sea State Analysis 2/22/2016. CE A676 Coastal Engineering Orson P. Smith, PE, Ph.D.

Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project FERC No Appendix C. Derelict Gear Monitoring Plan

Scanning Laser Vibrometry Assessment of Sports Equipment

BILLY BISHOP TORONTO CITY AIRPORT PRELIMINARY RUNWAY DESIGN COASTAL ENGINEERING STUDY

Anthropogenic Noise and the Marine Environment

UXO Below: Mitigating Marine UXO Risk

Final Report Alaska Department of Fish and Game State Wildlife Grant T July 1, 2003 June 30, 2006:

~ A Behavioral Response Study in 2007 &2008 (BRS 07/08) was conducted in the Bahamas to

Appendix F: Ecology F-6 Methodology for Estimating Potential Hydroacoustic Impacts to Abundant Hudson River Fish Species and Shortnose Sturgeon from

Marine Debris from Land to Sea: Holistic Characterization, Reduction and Education Efforts in New Hampshire

inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering August 2000, Nice, FRANCE

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AUTHORITY JOINT STATEMENT OF EXPERTS IN THE FIELD OF MARINE MAMMALS

STOPPING THE UNDERWATER DIVER THREAT

ANNEX. to the. Commission Delegated Regulation

Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; San Francisco- Oakland Bay Bridge Pier E3 Demolition via Controlled Implosion

DECEMBER 15-18, 1997 ADELAIDE, SOUTH AUSTRALIA. Douglas H. Cato. Defence Science and Technology Organisation PO Box 44, Pyrmont, NSW, 2009, Australia

under: the Resource Management Act 1991

Observations of noise generated by nonlinear internal waves on the continental shelf during the SW06 experiment

Acoustic Focusing in Shallow Water and Bubble Radiation Effects

DIAGNOSTICS OF IMPULSE LINE BLOCKAGE WITH A MULTI-SENSING DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE TRANSMITTER AT THE AIR LINE

The Path to LUBRICATION EXCELLENCE

Client Report : Air Overpressure from Le Maitre Flash Report Effects

Dive Operations Plan for Personal Submersibles. Revision

APPENDIX 9.8-A. Construction and Terminal Activity Underwater Noise Modelling Study Technical Report

Wave Transmission Testing of the Martin Ecosystems BioHaven Floating Breakwater

Similarly to elastic waves, sound and other propagated waves are graphically shown by the graph:

9.2 Waves at Media Boundaries

Oregon Hatchery Research Center January 2014 David L. G. Noakes, Professor & Director

Increased streamer depth for dual-sensor acquisition Challenges and solutions Marina Lesnes*, Anthony Day, Martin Widmaier, PGS

Noise, Radiation, and Other Exposures for Construction

Sound production in mysticetes. Background. Cetacean vocal frequency ranges Dolphins

PUV Wave Directional Spectra How PUV Wave Analysis Works

Waves, Bubbles, Noise, and Underwater Communications

NORD STREAM 2 UNDERWATER NOISE MODELLING, FINLAND

Management of Shellfish Aquaculture and Propagation in Massachusetts Waters

White Rose Extension Project

Chs. 16 and 17 Mechanical Waves

TRANSPORT OF NEARSHORE DREDGE MATERIAL BERMS

Behavioral Response of Dolphins to Signals Simulating Mid-Frequency Sonar

MAPCO2 Buoy Metadata Report Project Title:

Pile Driving and Barotrauma Effects

Harbor Porpoise Take Reduction Plan: New England

Status: Rev: Comments Date: Authors: Reviewer:

Marine Mammal Acoustic Tracking from Adapting HARP Technologies

Mitigating Noise from Open Detonations at China Lake

Seismic Sources. Seismic sources. Recorders. Requirements; Principles; Onshore, offshore. Digitals recorders; Analog-to-Digital (A/D) converters.

INSTRUCTION MANUAL. Microphone Type 4966 for Hand held Analyzer Types 2250, 2250 L and Supplement to Instruction Manual BE 1712

The Modeling and Simulation of Underwater Acoustic Energy Exposure Due to Near Surface Explosions on Marine Mammals

Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI) Moorings: New Capabilities for Seagoing Science

Lecture 8. Sound Waves Superposition and Standing Waves

High Frequency Acoustical Propagation and Scattering in Coastal Waters

Adulteration of underwater acoustic measurements

Charlottetown Marine Terminal Pipeline Decommissioning Project Description

Transcription:

Benefit of ESTCP/SERDP Research Program on Underwater Explosive Safety Timothy W. Shelton, PE Supervisory Research Hydraulic Engineer ERDC CHL Oct 2017

DoD has very few options for disposing UXO recovered from underwater DoD has no options for disposing UXO in sensitive marine environments DoD probably has a really, really big underwater UXO liability, and It hasn t come to grips with it yet, or, It s waiting for an economical way to deal with it Problem Statement

Problem Statement There are two currently available UXO and DMM disposal options: Tow them to shore or out to sea and blow them up Blow them in place (BIP) BIP is not an option in sensitive habitats BIP or blow at sea are not an option when protected or marine mammals may be present These operations are inherently dangerous!

Proposed Solution Develop mobile, reusable blast box that can be deployed on standard work barges for use in demolition of found underwater UXO Design box for multiple (potentially infinite) uses Reduce potential for barge damage to near zero Reduce hazard potential for personnel involved in demolition efforts. Minimize negative impacts on marine environment. Define positive mitigation efforts to offset environmental impacts.

Technical Approach Field Experiments Conducted to collect data pertaining to transmission of sounds waves from the source of the explosive, through both the open air and the box and barge system, into the water column. Will provide information related to expected impacts on marine environment Will provide V&V data for numerical modeling efforts Used as a sanity check for the 1/3-scale blast box design Can potentially be used to develop relationship between airblast at surface and recorded decibel levels recorded by hydrophones (ERDC capability exists) Can potentially be used to develop relationship between accelerometer data and hydrophone data to correlate pressure and particle velocity to decibel level recorded by hydrophones (Instrumentation needed) 5

Technical Approach Numerical Modeling Uses field data to correlate expected parameters beyond the range of net explosive weights that can be tested in field experiments Can provide expected full-scale loadings and impacts on V&V is complete Used to double check structural adequacy of the blast box Used to guide experimental process Able to identify predict increased load from airblast transfer into water Can be used qualify/quantify potential mitigation effects on pressure transferred to marine environment Can potentially be used to develop relationship between airblast at surface and recorded decibel levels recorded by hydrophones (more field data needed) Can potentially be used to develop relationship between accelerometer data and hydrophone data to correlate pressure and particle velocity to decibel level recorded by hydrophones (more field data needed) 6

Technical Progress - Experiments 55 Experiments conducted to date (2016 2017) Blast box has not shown any signs of damage scaled explosive weight has far exceeded anticipated prototype weapon sizes Two separate experiment setups conducted HE in blast box, on work barges HE suspended from cable above water; no structural interaction from blast box and barge system Hydrophone data collected on every event Original experiments did not provide conclusive evidence regarding the modes of soundwave transfer from demolition into marine environment Second experiment set designed to isolate the airblast itself; remove vibration of the box & barge system We are progressing towards a quantifiable result, but we have more work to do 7

Technical Progress - Experiments BUILDING STRONG 8

Technical Progress - Experiments 9

Technical Progress - Experiments BUILDING STRONG 10

Technical Progress - Experiments BUILDING STRONG 11

Technical Progress - Experiments BUILDING STRONG

Explosives Effects on Marine Animals Anthropogenic noise is of great concern to marine species Primary focus is on marine mammals Invertebrates and fish will be consider for long-term success Three level of effects Sub-lethal effects that create or alter hearing, behaviour, social interactions, fecundity (fitness) and performance Lethal effects that cause direct harm that results in indirect or direct mortality Indirect effects such as changes in food web 13

Assessment of Explosive Effects on Marine Animal NOAA 2016 Technical Guidance for Assessing the Effects of Anthropogenic Sound on Marine Mammal Hearing No biological data on above surface explosions coupling to water Limited biological data for model incorporation Limited biological data on low-frequency effects Key metrics: weighted SEL & unweighted peak SPL thresholds Actions for FY17 Q4 and FY18: Consult within DOD, DOE, partnering companies and stakeholders Collect data on detonation signals and effects on tissue Model underwater propagation of surface explosions Examine alternative protective mechanisms 14

Technical Progress In-air experimental design and analyses Locations 100, 250, 500, 750 feet from C4 Depths 15 and 30 feet FFT transformations Power spectral density Spectrogram Peak sound pressure levels (SPL pk db re 1µPa) Cumulative sound exposure levels (SEL cum db re 1µPa-s) SPL by Audiogram Teledyne/Reson hydrophones Receiving voltage sensitivity -206 db re 1V/µPa (± 3dB) Usable frequency range 1Hz to 120 khz Sampling rate 44 to 96 khz 15

Assessment of Explosive Effects on Marine Animal NOAA 2016 Technical Guidance for Assessing the Effects of Anthropogenic Sound on Marine Mammal Hearing No biological data on above surface explosions coupling to water Limited biological data for model incorporation Limited biological data on low-frequency effects Key metrics: weighted SEL & unweighted peak SPL thresholds Actions for FY17 Q4 and FY18: Consult within DOD, DOE, partnering companies and stakeholders Collect data on detonation signals and effects on tissue Model underwater propagation of surface explosions Examine alternative protective mechanisms 16

Future Anticipated Associated Research Develop Locate and Recover system that would be remotely operated Develop remotely operated, barge-mounted crane to lift UXO onto barge system after surfacing End Result Significant reduction in personnel risk

Findings Structurally, the box and barge system is sound Repeated scaled experiments No structural damage, even with scaled munitions up to 1000 lbs, prototype Environmental Impacts still be investigated Additional experimentation and modeling is required to determine sound level introduced in marine environment

Questions? Timothy W. Shelton, PE Chief, Navigation Branch Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Timothy.w.shelton@usace.army.mil 601-634-2304