Case 1:17-cv APM Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 18. United States District Court District of Columbia

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:10-cv HRH Document 1 Filed 05/28/10 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA

Case 2:13-cv LKK-CKD Document 1 Filed 11/26/13 Page 1 of 14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Defendant. JURY DEMANDED PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/29/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Sixty-Day Notice Of Intent To Sue For Clean Water Act Violations By Suction Dredge Mining On Salmon River Without A Permit

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 1:16-cv BLW Document 1 Filed 06/22/16 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:13-cv RJS-EJF Document 2 Filed 08/27/13 Page 1 of 21

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ADA. Case No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. KAYAK Software Corporation, by its attorneys, Foley & Lardner LLP, for its Complaint

Case 1:13-cv JEB Document 20 Filed 05/15/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv UA Document 1 Filed 02/14/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THIRD DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE RELIEF. Plaintiff, Defendants. I INTRODUCTION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/17/17 Page 1 of 37 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF WAYNE ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON

Filing Fee: $88.00 Category: A

Case Doc 1 Filed 10/06/09 Entered 10/06/09 18:33:53 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 11

Case 4:15-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 11/12/15 Page 1 of 12

Courtesy of

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case: 2:15-cv WOB-JGW Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/28/15 Page: 1 of 10 - Page ID#: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 9:11-cv DWM Document 64 Filed 06/21/11 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) I. PARTIES

Case 3:12-cv MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 08/07/12 Page 1 of 12 PagelD: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv RCL Document 1 Filed 04/21/14 Page 1 of 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 4:13-cv KES Document 1 Filed 05/10/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 7:17-cv RAJ Document 6 Filed 06/01/17 Page 1 of 12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

August 2, 2016 MEMORANDUM. Council Members. SUBJECT: Bull trout ESA litigation update

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY I. PARTIES

Case 1:14-cv RCL Document 13 Filed 05/16/14 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Montgomery County Common Pleas Court

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 05/27/10 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

The government moves for reconsideration of part of my Opinion and Order of September

Courthouse News Service

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR THURSTON COUNTY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. INTRODUCTION

STATE OF INDIANA ) IN THE MARION SUPERIOR COURT ) CIVIL DIVISION COUNTY OF MARION )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION COMPLAINT

CHAPTER 3.24 SWIMMING POOLS

Case 2:15-cv NBF Document 29 Filed 06/04/15 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Civil Action No. I* \Q ^\J bjo

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION SENATE BILL DRS45071-MQf-19. Short Title: Off-Track Pari-Mutuel Betting. (Public)

Davis v. Latschar. 202 F.3d 359 (D.C.Cir. 02/22/2000) program to curtail the over-browsing of wooded and crop areas by white-tailed deer in Gettysburg

In the Supreme Court of the United States

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:15-cv RJB Document 1 Filed 03/03/15 Page 1 of 26

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

For mutual consideration received, which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

Case 1:14-cv REB-KLM Document 1 Filed 10/03/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

CODE OF CONDUCT. (Version: 1 January 2018)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

No. 24 of Professional Boxing Control Board Act Certified on: / /20.

WikiLeaks Document Release

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

TITLE 11. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT

RE: Request for Audit of Ineligible Federal Aid Grants to Alaska Department of Fish & Game for Support of Predator Management

FIVB TRIBUNAL REGULATIONS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED by the Galveston County United Board of Health of the Galveston County Health District as follows:

COMPLAINT FOR DESIGN PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND UNFAIR AND DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Case 3:15-cv Document 1 Filed 12/16/15 Page 1 of 33

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. Case No.: 15-CA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF WYOMING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/22/18 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO

CENTER for BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY VIA FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION AND CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

NOTICE OF MOTION MOTION: # X Regulation 2.1 (Definitions)

Case: 3:14-cv DAK Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/14/14 1 of 13. PageID #: 1

The Somerset R.F.U Knock-Out Vase Competition Regulations

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SENATE, No. 576 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 216th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2014 SESSION

Sec Public swimming pools and bathing places Health Department permits and approval.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Transcription:

Case 1:17-cv-02000-APM Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 18 United States District Court District of Columbia 12 Percent Logistics, Inc. 4520 NE 18 th Avenue, Suite 300 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33334; Small Business in Transportation Coalition, on behalf of its members, 1775 Eye Street, NW, Suite 1150 Washington, D.C. 20006; Plaintiffs, v. Civil Case No. Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board, d/b/a Unified Carrier Registration Board, c/o Avelino Gutierrez Chairman, UCR Plan Board Staff Counsel/Legal Division 1120 Paseo De Peralta, Room 536 Santa Fe, NM 87501 c/o Attorney General Jeff Sessions Office of the Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530 Indiana Department of Revenue; c/o Attorney General Curtis Hill Office of the Indiana Attorney General Indiana Government Center South 302 W. Washington St., 5th Floor Indianapolis, IN 46204 and Adam J. Krupp, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Indiana Department of Revenue Office of Commissioner Indiana Department of Revenue M.S. 101 100 N. Senate Ave., Room N248 Indianapolis, IN 46204; Defendants. -1-

Case 1:17-cv-02000-APM Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 2 of 18 Verified Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief Plaintiffs complain as follows: Introduction 1. The Unified Carrier Registration ( UCR ) program is a Congressionally-created, stateadministered registration program for motor carriers, brokers and freight forwarders established in 2005. See Unified Carrier Registration Act of 2005, 49 U.S.C. 14504a. States join the UCR program by entering into the UCR Agreement. Under the UCR Agreement, motor carriers, brokers and freight forwarders must register and pay UCR fees, beginning October 1st through December 31st, for the upcoming year. The Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board ( UCR Plan Board ), however, on September 14, 2017, voted to delay the opening of the UCR Renewal Period to November 1, 2017, without any public notice and legal justification. The Indiana Department of Revenue ( INDOR ), which, under contract with the UCR Plan Board, administers the UCR program for most states, has likewise delayed the opening of the UCR Renewal Period until November 1, 2017, contrary to the requirements of the UCR Agreement. 2. This case involves violations of the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b ( Sunshine Act ), the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 706 ( APA ) and the UCR authorizing statute, 49 U.S.C. 14504a, committed by UCR Plan Board, and a violation of UCR Agreement by the INDOR, in delaying the opening of the UCR Renewal Period until November 1, 2017. Jurisdiction and Venue 3. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 5 U.S.C. 552b(h), 5 U.S.C. 702, and 28 U.S.C. 1331. 4. Venue is proper in this Court under 5 U.S.C. 552b(h), 5 U.S.C. 703, and 28 U.S.C. Verified Complaint -2-

Case 1:17-cv-02000-APM Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 3 of 18 1391. Parties 5. Plaintiff 12 Percent Logistics, Inc. ( 12PL, Inc. ) is a broker company located in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, that has registered and paid the UCR fees since 2008. Plaintiff 12PL, Inc. intends to register and to pay the 2018 UCR-related fees with the Defendant INDOR on October 2, 2017, or as soon thereafter as the INDOR begins accepting UCR registrations and fees for 2018. 6. Plaintiff Small Business in Transportation Coalition ( SBTC ) is a trade organization located in Washington, D.C. SBTC has over 8,000 members and represents, promotes, and protects the interests of small businesses in the transportation industry. It has members that are Carriers that have registered and paid UCR-related fees beginning in 2008. Many SBTC members intend to register and to pay UCR-related fees for 2018 with the INDOR beginning on October 1, 2017. SBTC asserts the interests of its members, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief on their behalf. 7. Defendant UCR Plan Board is an agency of the United States government and is established to administer the UCR Plan. 49 U.S.C. 14504a(d). 8. Defendant INDOR is an Indiana government agency which, under contract with the UCR Plan Board, has been registering Carriers and collecting the UCR-related fees from UCR registrants since 2008. (See 2008 Memorandum of Understanding ( MOU ), attached as Ex. 1, at A3-A6.). Under the agreement with the UCR Plan Board, INDOR operates a comprehensive website for UCR information, UCR registration, and payment of UCR-related fees. Id. Available at https://www.ucr.in.gov/ucrhome.html. Verified Complaint -3-

Case 1:17-cv-02000-APM Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 4 of 18 9. Adam J. Krupp is the Commissioner of Defendant INDOR and is its chief administrative officer. The Commissioner is appointed by the Indiana governor. Ind. Code 6-8.1-2-2. Defendant Krupp is sued in his official capacity. UCR Background 10. The UCR program is a Congressionally-created, state-administered registration program for motor carriers, brokers and freight forwarders. See 49 U.S.C. 14504a. 11. Each year, motor carriers, brokers and freight forwarders must register and pay UCRrelated fees, as authorized by the UCR authorizing statute. Id. at 14504a(f)(4). The UCR authorizing statute and the UCR Agreement require any UCR fees to be set by the Secretary of Transportation, id. at 14504a(d)(7)(B), based on recommendations of the UCR Board. Id. at 14504a(d)(1)(A), 14504a(d)(7)(A). (UCR Agreement, attached as Ex. 2, at 14.) 12. When setting the UCR fees: The Secretary shall set the initial annual fees for the next agreement year and any subsequent adjustment of those fees- (i) within 90 days after receiving the board s recommendation under subparagraph (A); and (ii)after notice and opportunity for public comment 49 U.S.C. at 14504a(d)(7)(B). 13. The Secretary of Transportation set the UCR fee in 2010, 49 C.F.R. 367.30, which is applicable for the 2018 registration year and will be charged during Renewal Period beginning on October 1, 2017. 14. The period between October 1 through December 31 ( Renewal Period ) is the renewal period for registration and payment of UCR fees for 2018. The Renewal Period is set by the UCR Agreement. (UCR Agreement, Ex. 2, at 3.) October 1 is the Opening Date of UCR Renewal Period. Verified Complaint -4-

Case 1:17-cv-02000-APM Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 5 of 18 15. INDOR has entered into three Memoranda of Understanding with the UCR Plan Board, (2008 MOU, attached as Ex. 1; 2013 MOU, attached as Ex. 3; 2016 MOU, attached as Ex. 4), and has registered and collected UCR-related fees from motor carriers, brokers and freight forwarders from many states since 2008. Legal Context 16. The UCR Plan Board is authorized to change the terms of the UCR Agreement, including the October 1st opening date for the Renewal Period. (UCR Agreement, Ex. 2, at 18.) 17. In order for the UCR Plan Board to change the terms of the UCR Agreement, the UCR Plan Board must utilize the following procedures: Any recommendation for changes to the UCR Agreement shall be made in writing to the chairman of the Board. Upon receipt of the request, copies may be provided to each Board member and may be placed on the next Board agenda. Changes to the UCR Agreement can only be made with a majority vote from the Board. (UCR Agreement, Ex. 2, at 18.) 18. Both the UCR authorizing statute and the UCR Agreement require meetings of the UCR Plan Board to be open to the public and make them subject to the provisions of The Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b. 49 U.S.C. 14504a(d)(4)(D). (UCR Agreement, Ex. 2, at 13.) 19. The Sunshine Act defines a meeting as the deliberations of at least the number of individual agency members required to take action on behalf of the agency where such deliberations determine or result in the joint conduct or disposition of official agency business. 5 U.S.C. at 552b(a)(2). 20. For each meeting, the agency shall make public announcement, at least one week before the meeting, of the time, place, and subject matter of the meeting, whether it is to be open or closed to the public, and the name and phone number of the official designated by the agency to respond Verified Complaint -5-

Case 1:17-cv-02000-APM Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 6 of 18 to requests for information about the meeting. Such announcement shall be made unless a majority of the members of the agency determines by a recorded vote that agency business requires that such meeting be called at an earlier date, in which case the agency shall make public announcement of the time, place, and subject matter of such meeting, and whether open or closed to the public, at the earliest practicable time. Id. at 552b(e)(1). 21. Additionally, immediately following each public announcement notice of the time, place, and subject matter of a meeting, whether the meeting is open or closed, any change in one of the preceding, and the name and phone number of the official designated by the agency to respond to requests for information about the meeting, shall also be submitted for publication in the Federal Register. Id. at 552b(e)(3). 22. Any person may bring an action against any agency for failure to comply with the public notice requirements of Section 552b and the court shall grant such declaratory judgement, injunctive relief, or other relief as may be appropriate. Id. at 552b(h). 23. The Administrative Procedures Act ( APA ) provides To the extent necessary to decision and when presented, the reviewing court shall decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions, and determine the meaning or applicability of the terms of an agency action. The reviewing court shall (2) hold unlawful and set aside agency action, findings, and conclusions found to be (A) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; ***** (D) without observance of procedure required by law; In making the foregoing determinations, the court shall review the whole record or those parts of it cited by a party, and due account shall be taken of the rule of prejudicial error. 5 U.S.C. 706. 24. Under the APA, [a] person suffering legal wrong because of agency action, or adversely affected or aggrieved by agency action within the meaning of a relevant statute, is entitled to judicial review thereof. 5 U.S.C. 702. Verified Complaint -6-

Case 1:17-cv-02000-APM Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 7 of 18 Facts 25. On March 14, 2017, the UCR Plan Board, at its monthly meeting, voted to recommend to the Secretary of Transportation a revised 2018 and 2019 fee structure and sent that recommendation to the Secretary. (See 2017-03 UCR Board Meeting Minutes, attached as Ex. 5, at 3.) In 2010, the UCR fee had been established, 49 C.F.R. 367.30, which would be applicable to 2018 and 2019, unless changed by the Secretary. 26. The Secretary of Transportation had until June 12, 2017, to revise the annual fees for 2018 and 2019 based on the UCR Plan Board s recommendation. See 49 U.S.C. 14504a(d)(7)(B). 27. On September 14, 2017, the UCR Plan Board met and voted to change the Opening Date of the Renewal Period, which is October 1 in the UCR Agreement, from October 1 to November 1. (See article UCR filings? Don t do it yet, attached as Ex. 6.) 28. There was no public notice of the September 14, 2017, meeting of the UCR Plan Board and no notice of the meeting was published in the Federal Register. 29. The effect of changing the Opening Date of the Renewal Period from October 1 to November 1 is to delay the opening of the Renewal Period by 30 days and to also shorten the Renewal Period from 90 to 60 days. 30. At the September 14, 2017, meeting, the UCR Plan Board justified the change in the Opening Date for the Renewal Period, because FMCSA has not yet decided on the fee structure or taken steps required to finalize the new fee chart. (See article UCR filings? Don t do it yet, attached as Ex. 6.) Because of this delay, the UCR Plan Board voted to extend the October 1 st Opening Date another 30 days. (Id.) 31. However, the UCR fees applicable to 2018 had already been set in 2010, 49 C.F.R. Verified Complaint -7-

Case 1:17-cv-02000-APM Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 8 of 18 367.30, and, since the FMCSA, acting for the Secretary, had not acted to change the 2018 UCR fees within 90 days of the UCR Plan Board s recommendation, the UCR fees for 2018 could not now be changed. 32. On September 15, the INDOR UCR website publicly announced that the UCR registration and fee payment period for 2018 opened on October 1, 2017. (INDOR UCR website page from September 15, 2017, attached as Ex. 7.) 33. However, on September 17, the INDOR UCR website was changed to announce that the UCR registration and fee payment period for 2018 had been delayed to begin on November 1. (INDOR UCR website page from September 17, 2017, attached as Ex. 8.) 34. The delay in the Opening Date for the Renewal Period for 2018 is to the detriment of motor carriers, brokers and freight forwarders because they have fewer days to comply with UCR. 35. 12PL, Inc. has registered and paid its UCR fees since 2008 and intends to register and pay its UCR fees with the INDOR on October 2nd this year. 36. Plaintiffs will suffer irreparable harm by the actions of Defendants, are suffering a legal wrong because of the actions of the Defendants, are adversely affected or aggrieved by the actions of the Defendants and have no adequate remedy at law. Count I UCR Plan Board Failed to Notice Meeting Under Sunshine Act and Federal Law. 37. Plaintiffs allege and incorporate by reference the assertions contained in paragraphs 1 through 36. 38. The UCR authorizing statute and the UCR Agreement require the UCR Plan Board s meetings to follow the provisions of section 552b of title 5. 49 U.S.C. U.S.C. Verified Complaint -8-

Case 1:17-cv-02000-APM Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 9 of 18 14504a(d)(4)(D). (UCR Agreement, attached as Ex. 2, at 13.). 39. Under the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b, at least one week before an agency meeting, the agency shall publicly notice or announce the meeting by stating the time, place, and subject matter of the meeting, whether it is to be open or closed to the public, and the name and phone number of the official designated by the agency to respond to requests for information about the meeting. Id. at 552b(e)(1). Immediately following the public announcement, the agency meeting shall also be submitted for publication in the Federal Register. 5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3). 40. The UCR Plan Board held a meeting on September 14, 2017, with no public notice and no publication of the notice in the Federal Register. (See UCR filings? Don t do it yet, attached as Ex. 6.) 41. On September 14, 2017, meeting of the UCR Plan Board, the Board voted to change the Opening Date for Renewal Period from October 1, as required by the UCR Agreement, to November 1. 42. A federal court otherwise authorized by law to review agency action may set aside, enjoin, or invalidate agency action that intentionally or repeatedly violates the Sunshine Act, or that prejudices a party and is of a serious nature. Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 684 F.2d 31, 36 (D.D.C. 1982) (quoting H.R. Rep. No. 1441, 94th Cong., 2d Sess. 23 (1976)); S. Rep. No. 94-354, at 34 (1975). 43. The UCR Plan Board violated the Sunshine Act and the UCR authorizing statute by failing to provide public notice of the September 14, 2017, meeting and by failing to publish notice of the meeting in the Federal Register. 44. This action of the UCR Plan Board was in a manner that was intentional, prejudices Plaintiffs, and is of a serious nature. Verified Complaint -9-

Case 1:17-cv-02000-APM Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 10 of 18 45. As a result, any action taken during the September 14, 2017, meeting of the UCR Plan Board, including delaying the Opening Date of the Renewal Period, is invalid and set aside. Count II UCR Plan Board Failure to Notice Meeting Violates the APA Because It Failed to Observe Procedures Required by Law. 46. Plaintiffs allege and incorporate by reference the assertions contained in paragraphs 1 through 36. 47. The Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 706(2)(D), requires a court to set aside agency action found to be without observance of procedures required by law. Nat l Ass n of Broads. v. Copyright Royalty Tribunal, 218 U.S. App. D.C. 348, 675 F.2d 367, 370 (1982). 48. Pursuant to the UCR authorizing statute and the UCR Agreement, the UCR Plan Board must follow 5 U.S.C. 552b, the Sunshine Act procedures. 49 U.S.C. 14504a(d)(4)(D). (UCR Agreement, Ex. 2, at 13.) 49. Under the Sunshine Act, at least one week before an agency meeting, the agency shall publicly notice or announce the meeting by stating the time, place, and subject matter of the meeting, whether it is to be open or closed to the public, and the name and phone number of the official designated by the agency to respond to requests for information about the meeting. 5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(1). Immediately following the public announcement, the agency meeting shall also be submitted for publication in the Federal Register. Id. at 552b(e)(3). 50. Since the UCR Plan Board failed to provide public notice of the September 14, 2017, meeting and failed to publish notice of the meeting in the Federal Register, it did not observe the procedure required by law, violating the APA. 51. Thus, any action taken by the UCR Plan Board at the September 14, 2017, meeting, including delaying the Opening Date of the Renewal Period for 2018, is invalid and set aside. Verified Complaint -10-

Case 1:17-cv-02000-APM Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 11 of 18 Count III UCR Plan Board s Actions Violate the APA as Arbitrary or Capricious. 52. Plaintiffs allege and incorporate by reference the assertions contained in paragraphs 1 through 36. 53. Furthermore, the APA provides that any agency action shall be held unlawful and set aside if the action is arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law. 5 U.S.C. 706(2)(A). 54. An agency action is arbitrary and capricious if the agency has relied on factors which Congress has not intended it to consider, entirely failed to consider an important aspect of the problem, offered an explanation for its decision that runs counter to the evidence before the agency, or is so implausible that it could not be ascribed to a difference in view or the product of agency expertise. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass n v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29, 43, 103 S. Ct. 2856, 2867 (1983). The reviewing court must assure itself that the agency decision was based on consideration of the relevant factors. Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1, 34-35 (D.C. Cir. 1976)(citing Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 415 (1971). Moreover, it must engage in a substantial inquiry into the facts, one that is searching and careful. Id. 55. Here, the UCR Plan Board voted to change the Opening Date of the Renewal Period to November 1, instead of October 1 as provided in the UCR Agreement, allowing only 60 days for all motor carriers, brokers and freight forwarders to register and pay fees instead of the customary 90 days. 56. The justification for this agency action was because FMCSA has not yet decided on the fee structure or taken steps required to finalize the new fee chart. (See article UCR filings? Verified Complaint -11-

Case 1:17-cv-02000-APM Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 12 of 18 Don t do it yet, attached as Ex. 6.) 57. The UCR fee for 2018, however, had already been established in 2010 and the UCR Plan Board voted and recommended changes in the fee structure for 2018 and 2019 on March 14, 2017. (See 2017-03 UCR Board Meeting Minutes, attached as Ex. 5, at 3.) 58. According to UCR authorizing statute, [t]he Secretary shall set... any subsequent adjustment of those fees- (i) within 90 days after receiving the board s recommendation, 49 U.S.C. 14504a(d)(7)(B). 59. However, the Secretary did not change the UCR fee for 2018 and 2019 within 90 days of the UCR Plan Board s recommendation and that 90 day time period has elapsed. 60. While the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on September 21, 2017, to change the UCR fee for 2018 and 2019 under authority delegated from the Secretary of Transportation, 82 Fed. Reg. 44143 (September 21, 2017), that rulemaking cannot become final within 90 days of the UCR Plan Board s March 14, 2017, recommendation as required by the UCR authorizing statute, 49 U.S.C. 14504a(d)(7)(B), and is thus invalid under the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. 706(2)(D), for failure to follow required procedures. 61. The UCR Plan Board s justification for its action, therefore, is based on a possible future unlawful action of the Secretary and is thus arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, and otherwise not in accordance with law. 5 U.S.C. 706(2)(A). 62. Furthermore, the UCR Plan Board s action to change the Opening Date of the Renewal Period is a detriment to the motor carriers since it will shorten the number of days to comply with the UCR and create industry confusion and uncertainty. In addition, some carriers will make a good faith effort to comply in October but will be unlawfully block from complying with the Verified Complaint -12-

Case 1:17-cv-02000-APM Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 13 of 18 UCR. As a result, these carriers will be vulnerable to penalties for failure to comply with the UCR. 63. As a result the UCR Plan Board s action to delay the Opening Date for the 2018 UCR Renewal Period is invalid and set aside. Count IV INDOR Unlawfully Changed the UCR Opening Date for 2018 Renewals. 64. Plaintiffs allege and incorporate by reference the assertions contained in paragraphs 1 through 36. 65. The UCR Agreement states that the Renewal Period for UCR registration and payment of the UCR fees is October 1 through December 31 for the forthcoming year. (UCR Agreement, Ex. 2, at 3.) 66. Under the UCR Agreement, INDOR is required to open the Renewal Period for 2018 on October 1. 67. On September 15, the INDOR UCR website publicly announced that the UCR registration and fee payment period for 2018 opened on October 1, 2017. 68. However, on September 17, the INDOR UCR website was changed to announce that the beginning of the UCR registration and UCR fee payment period for 2018 had been delayed to November 1. (INDOR UCR website page from September 17, 2017, Ex. 8.) 69. As a result, the INDOR will not accept UCR registration and payment of UCR fees until that date. (Id.) 70. The INDOR s refusal to open the UCR Registration Period on October 1, 2017, is a violation of the UCR Agreement, since there has been no lawful action of the UCR Plan Board to change the Opening Date of October 1 for the Renewal Period. Verified Complaint -13-

Case 1:17-cv-02000-APM Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 14 of 18 71. INDOR will unlawfully fail to accept UCR registrations and fees beginning on October 1. Prayer for Relief Wherefore, Plaintiffs respectfully pray this Court to: 1. Declare that the UCR Plan Board violated the Sunshine Act by failing to give lawful public notice of its meeting on September 14, 2017; 2. Declare that any actions of the UCR Plan Board at its meeting on September 14, 2017, are invalid and set aside, including the change in the Opening Date for the 2018 UCR Renewal Period from October 1 to November 1, for violating the Sunshine Act and the Administrative Procedure Act by failing to give lawful public notice of its meeting; 3. Declare that the change in the Opening Date for the 2018 UCR Renewal Period from October 1 to November 1 by the UCR Plan Board was invalid and set aside for violating the Administrative Procedure Act as arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, and otherwise not in accordance with law; 4. Enjoin the UCR Plan Board from further violating the Sunshine Act by failing to give lawfully required public notice of its meetings; 5. Enjoin INDOR from refusing to accept UCR registrations and payment of UCR fees for 2018 beginning on October 1, 2017; 6. Award all costs and expenses of bringing this action, including attorneys fees and costs; and 7. Grant any other relief this court deems appropriate. Verified Complaint -14-

Case 1:17-cv-02000-APM Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 15 of 18 Respectfully submitted, /s/james Bopp, Jr. James Bopp, Jr., DC #CO0041 jboppjr@aol.com THE BOPP LAW FIRM, PC 1 South Sixth Street Terre Haute, IN 47807-3510 812/232-2434 telephone 812/235-3685 facsimile Verified Complaint -15-

Case 1:17-cv-02000-APM Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 16 of 18

Case 1:17-cv-02000-APM Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 17 of 18

Case 1:17-cv-02000-APM Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 18 of 18 Certificate of Service I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing served, by email on September 27, 2017 and by certified mail on September 28, 2017, upon: Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board c/o Avelino Gutierrez Chairman, UCR Plan Board Staff Counsel/Legal Division 1120 Paseo De Peralta, Room 536 Santa Fe, NM 87501 Avelino.Gutierrez@state.nm.us 505-827-4565 Indiana Department of Revenue c/o Attorney General Curtis Hill Office of the Indiana Attorney General Indiana Government Center South 302 W. Washington St., 5th Floor Indianapolis, IN 46204 jacqueline.day@atg.in.gov 317-232-6201 c/o Attorney General Jeff Sessions Office of the Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 askdoj@usdoj.gov 202-514-2000 Adam Krupp Office of Commissioner Indiana Department of Revenue M.S. 101 100 N. Senate Ave. Room N248 Indianapolis, IN 46204 akrupp1@dor.in.gov 317-232-2109 /s/ James Bopp, Jr. James Bopp, Jr.