Gray Wolf Prey Base Ecology in the North Fork Flathead River Drainage

Similar documents
Copyright 2018 by Jamie L. Sandberg

A Review of Mule and Black-tailed Deer Population Dynamics

White-Tailed Deer Management FAQ

Northern Yellowstone Cooperative Wildlife Working Group 2012 Annual Report (October 1, 2012-September 30, 2012) Member Agencies

2017 LATE WINTER CLASSIFICATION OF NORTHERN YELLOWSTONE ELK

2008 WMU 360 moose, white tailed deer and mule deer. Section Authors: Robb Stavne, Dave Stepnisky and Mark Heckbert

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 510 moose

The Impact of Wolf Reintroduction on the Foraging Efficency of Elk and Bison

Population Ecology Yellowstone Elk by C. John Graves

MOUNTAIN CARIBOU INTERACTIONS WITH WOLVES AND MOOSE IN CENTRAL BRITISH COLUMBIA

Elk Movements, Habitat Use, and Population Dynamics in Theodore Roosevelt National Park

2008 WMU 359 moose, mule deer, and white tailed deer

Mule and Black-tailed Deer

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 536 moose

White-tailed Deer: A Review of the 2010 Provincially Coordinated Hunting Regulation

2008 WMU 106 mule deer

Effects of 1988 Fires on Ecology of Coyotes in Yellowstone National Park: Baseline Preceding Possible Wolf Recovery

Agriculture Zone Winter Replicate Count 2007/08

2009 Update. Introduction

2009 WMU 527 Moose, Mule Deer, and White tailed Deer

Southwest Alberta Wolves: Prey, Movements, and Habitat

RYAN WALKER, New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, P. O. Box 1145, Raton, NM 87740, (575) ,

DEER DISTRIBUTION IN RELATION TO WOLF PACK TERRITORY EDGES

Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Long history in ecology

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 501 moose and deer

LITTLE SALMON AND MAGUNDY RIVERS

Findings of the Alaska Board of Game BOG

2009 Stone s Sheep / Caribou Inventory - MU 7-52

Cabinet-Yaak / Selkirk Mountains 2016 Grizzly Bear Monitoring

2009 WMU 328 Moose and Elk

2009 Aerial Moose Survey

J. R. McGillis THE KIDNEY FAT INDEX AS AN INDICATOR OF CONDITION IN VARIOUS AGE AND SEX CLASSES OF MOOSE. Canadian Wildlife Service

Summary of discussion

FIVE YEAR SUMMARY OF EAST REGION WILDLIFE RESEARCH PROGRAM

Population Parameters and Their Estimation. Uses of Survey Results. Population Terms. Why Estimate Population Parameters? Population Estimation Terms

Pr oject Summar y. Principal Investigators: Walter Cook, Elizabeth Williams, Fred Lindzey, and Ron Grogan. University of Wyoming

APPENDIX A. Population characteristics, movements, and disease surveillance in the Palisades mountain goat herd, Wyoming 2015.

Annual Report Ecology and management of feral hogs on Fort Benning, Georgia.

Wildlife CSI - Panhandle elk mortality study

Mountain Caribou Recovery Implementation Plan. Predator/Prey Component. Terms of Reference

TWENTY-SIX YEARS. Delisting the Yellowstone Grizzly Bear. A Lesson in Cooperation, Conservation, and Monitoring

MOOSE MOVEMENTS FROM EAR-TAG RETURNS. B. P. Saunders and J. C. Williamson. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Wildlife Branch

CAMERA SURVEYS: HELPING MANAGERS AVOID THE PITFALLS

DEER AND ELK POPULATION STATUS AND HARVEST STRUCTURE IN WESTERN NORTH AMERICA: A SUMMARY OF STATE AND PROVINCIAL STATUS SURVEYS.

American Society of Mammalogists

MAYO MOOSE MANAGEMENT UNIT

CHISANA CARIBOU HERD

The Effects of Suburban Development and Wolf (Canis lupis) Recolonization on Coyotes (Canis latrans) in Jackson Hole, Wyoming

Parasites of Ungulates in the Jackson Hole Area: Scarabaeoid Beetles Acting on Lungworm, Dictyocaulus hadweni, Larvae in Elk Feces 1980

The 2009 Montana Wolf Hunting Season

2008 Aerial Moose Survey. Mark S. Lenarz, Forest Wildlife Populations and Research Group

Findings of the Alaska Board of Game BOG

Effects of 1988 Fires on Ecology of Coyotes in Yellowstone National Park: Baseline Preceding Possible Wolf Recovery

Mountain Caribou Recovery Implementation Plan Progress Board. Annual Report on Activities and Accomplishments of the Mountain Caribou Recovery

Selection of Northern Yellowstone Elk by Gray Wolves and Hunters

Wolf Predation: Hunting Behavior and Predator- Prey Systems

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations

Stakeholder Activity

PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF WOLF-UNGULATE INTERACTIONS WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO MOOSE IN RIDING MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK, MANITOBA

Status Report on the Yellowstone Bison Population, August 2016 Chris Geremia 1, Rick Wallen, and P.J. White August 17, 2016

WEST KOOTENAY MULE DEER PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT

Major threats, status. Major threats, status. Major threats, status. Major threats, status

2012 Wildlife Studies

SUBJ: Supporting document for March PWC staff mountain lion presentation

Findings and Guidelines Wednesday, March 12, 2003 Page 1

Monitoring Population Trends of White-tailed Deer in Minnesota Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group

Potential Effects of Oil and Gas Development on Mule Deer and Pronghorn Populations in Western Wyoming

Deer-Elk Ecology Research Project

PREDATOR CONTROL AND DEER MANAGEMENT: AN EAST TEXAS PERSPECTIVE

2012 Kootenay-Boundary Mule Deer Management Plan: Outline and Background Information

White-tailed Deer Hunting with Dogs in East Texas

Winter 2016 Hunting District 313 Elk survey (Gardiner to 6-Mile Creek) Date: Flight Duration: Weather/Survey Conditions: Survey Methods

under the James Lathrop & Wayne Capurro Internship program. I am confident in saying that

Influence of nutritional condition on migration, habitat selection and foraging ecology of elk (Cervus elaphus) in western Wyoming

Report to the Joint Standing Committee on Inland Fisheries and Wildlife

Record of a Sixteen-year-old White-tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in Carbondale, Illinois: a Brief Note.

ANNUAL REPORT

FINAL REPORT. Wildlife Road Survey and Human Interactions

Northern Mountain Caribou Population Dynamics Peace River Region

Kootenay (Region 4) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

How to Manage Deer Populations

Some Mechanisms Underlying Variation in Vital Rates of Grizzly Bears on a Multiple Use Landscape

2014 BANCROFT/NORTH HASTINGS ELK RESEARCH AND MONITORING UPDATE

Evaluation of Wildlife Mitigation Measures,

Wolf-Bison Interactions in Yellowstone National Park

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) M.L LCCMR Work Plan

Big Game Survey Results

Elk Movements, Habitat use, and Population Dynamics in Theodore Roosevelt National Park

Wyoming Game and Fish Department

Consideration for Moose Management in Ontario Northern Ontario First Nations Environmental Conference

WILDLIFE RESEARCH PERMIT APPLICATION MACKENZIE BISON POPULATION MONITORING

Moose Management in the Peace Region

HOME RANGE AND HABITAT USE OF PLAINS SPOTTED SKUNKS IN THE OZARK MOUNTAINS OF ARKANSAS

AN INCIDENTAL TAKE PLAN FOR CANADA LYNX AND MINNESOTA S TRAPPING PROGRAM

2007 Nordquist Wood Bison Inventory

Deer Management Unit 249

Peary caribou (Rangifer tarandus pearyi) and muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) on northwest Victoria Island, Northwest Territories

Deer and Bison Artiodactyla

make people aware of the department s actions for improving the deer population monitoring system,

THE BLACKFOOT WATERSHED WOLF AND BEAR ACTIVITY REPORT 10/27/2014

Transcription:

University of Wyoming National Park Service Research Center Annual Report Volume 13 13th Annual Report, 1989 Article 35 1-1-1989 Gray Wolf Prey Base Ecology in the North Fork Flathead River Drainage C. Les Marcum Daniel H. Pletscher John P. Weigand Bruce McLellan Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.uwyo.edu/uwnpsrc_reports Recommended Citation Marcum, C. Les; Pletscher, Daniel H.; Weigand, John P.; and McLellan, Bruce (1989) "Gray Wolf Prey Base Ecology in the North Fork Flathead River Drainage," University of Wyoming National Park Service Research Center Annual Report: Vol. 13, Article 35. Available at: http://repository.uwyo.edu/uwnpsrc_reports/vol13/iss1/35 This Yellowstone National Park Report is brought to you for free and open access by Wyoming Scholars Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Wyoming National Park Service Research Center Annual Report by an authorized editor of Wyoming Scholars Repository. For more information, please contact scholcom@uwyo.edu.

Marcum et al.: Gray Wolf Prey Base Ecology in the North Fork Flathead River Drai GRAY WOLF PREY BASE ECOLOGY IN THE NORTH FORK FLATHEAD RIVER DRAINAGE C. Les Marcum Daniel H. Pletscher John P. Weigand and Bruce McLellan School of Forestry Missoula Objectives The overall objective of this research is to study gray wolf (Canis lupus) ungulate interrelationships in a multi-prey system. This study will focus on elk (Cervus elaphus); others will focus on white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and moose (Alces alces). The study is being conducted in the North Fork of the Flathead River drainage, in Montana and British Columbia, Canada. Work will be concentrated on the western side of Glacier National Park, the main area of wolf recovery. The specific objectives of the study are to determine: 1. Age and cause-specific mortality rates for elk; 2. Seasonal distribution and identification of key elk seasonal use areas; 3. Age and sex distribution/composition in the elk population; 4. Establish an index to elk abundance and distribution that may be used for long-term monitoring. Methods We will assess cause-specific mortality for elk by using motion-sensitive radio transmitters (i.e., mortality collars). Collapsible traps that are modifications (Sparrowe and Springer 1970, Roper et al. 1971, McCullough 1975) of the original Clover (1954) design will be used to capture elk. 193 Published by Wyoming Scholars Repository, 1989 1

University of Wyoming National Park Service Research Center Annual Report, Vol. 13 [1989], Art. 35 Traps will be baited with second cutting alfalfa hay. We will place the traps within the territory of the Camas wolf pack in Glacier National Park, the Flathead National Forest, or southeastern British Columbia. Traps will be checked daily by mid-morning, and elk will be physically restrained after collapsing the traps. Mortality collars will be placed on yearling and adult female elk. The collars will be an inconspicuous color (probably brown). to satisfy the concerns of Glacier National Park rangers. Collars will be monitored daily to determine whether the animal is still moving. When the signal indicates that an animal has not moved for at least 4. hours, we will carefully approach the animal on the ground (after monitoring for collared predators) and determine the cause of mortality when possible (O'Gara 1978, Wobeser and Spraker 1980). Seasonal mortality rates will be determined for yearlings and adults following Heisey and Fuller (1985). A further breakdown by age may not possible due to the small sample size. Bear scat will be collected as in the past by McLellan, and the proportion of the scats containing elk remains will be determined. The proportion of elk remains in the diet of wolves will be determined by the Wolf Ecology Project using scat analysis from feces collected at den and rendezvous sites. Hair from calves will be identified separately from adults, and regression equations will be developed using the approach of Floyd et al. ( 1978) as modified by J. Weaver (pers. commun.). These regression equations will be used to estimate the proportion of calves in the diet. Movement patterns of elk in this area are unknown. Radiocollared animals will be relocated weekly to identify key areas of seasonal use and seasonal movements. Locations will be determined from the ground whenever possible, and from an aircraft when necessary. The Universal Transverse Mercator system of recording locations will be used to ease in data retrieval and to insure that these locations can be used later on a geographic information system. Areas receiving high seasonal use, as indicated both by radio locations and by pellet counts (see below), will be identified. Age and sex composition will be estimated when elk are aerially located during winter (Unsworth and Kuck 1988). Males continue to carry their antlers until the end of the winter and can thus be identified. Calves can be identified by size and by shape of the head. The sex and age composition of elk populations will also be estimated from road-side counts. Both elk and deer tend to concentrate along the North 194 http://repository.uwyo.edu/uwnpsrc_reports/vol13/iss1/35 2

Marcum et al.: Gray Wolf Prey Base Ecology in the North Fork Flathead River Drai Fork River in spring, making this the time when elk are most observable from the ground. This may not be a representative count of males and females but, if used for a number of years, should indicate trend. Cow-calf counts, estimted during aeiral surveys, should be representative of the population. Pellet group counts (Neff 1968) will be used as an index to estimate relative elk abundance. Transects will be established in cooperation with the white-tailed deer project and with the moose study. L. L. Eberhardt (pers. commun.) recommended transects that are distributed systematic to monitor trend. Results from P. Tucker's thesis, conducted in the same area, will be available this summer and will provide an estimate of the sample size needed to achieve different levels of precision for white-tailed deer. She also collected information on elk pellet groups, and these data will also be available. We will use Tucker's data on variability to enable us to detect 15% population change with 95% confidence. Once these transects are in place, an index of elk abundance (along with deer and moose) can continue to be obtained after this project is complete. Roadside counts, described above to monitor population composition, will also be used with location data to estimate population size. The number of radio collared elk seen will be used in conjunction with the number of radio collared animals in the area and the total number of elk seen to estimate population size using the Petersen Index (Caughley 1977). Because it is unlikely that large numbers of radio collared animals will be available in the future, the pellet transects will be the primary technique set up to monitor the elk population. Results This study was initiated on 1 October 1989; work to date has involved mostly planning and obtaining equipment and supplies. After a national search, Michael Bureau was selected to work on the study for an M.S. degree in Wildlife Biology. He has completed a draft of his thesis proposal. We have had four meetings with one or more cooperators from Glacier National Park, the u.s. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Flathead National Forest, the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, and the British Columbia Wildlife Branch to discuss and plan various aspects of the project, from logistics to research considerations. Based on wolf-kill location data from 1985-present (Boyd et 195 Published by Wyoming Scholars Repository, 1989 3

University of Wyoming National Park Service Research Center Annual Report, Vol. 13 [1989], Art. 35 al. 1989), reports from winter ranger patrols in Glacier National Park, and previous research on the winter distribution of cervids in the area (Jenkins 1985), three trapping areas have been chosen. These trap sites are located roughly in the northern, central and southern portions of the range inhabited by the wolf pack in the area. Five collapsible traps are now located at each site, and a supply of second-cut certified weed-free alfalfa hay has been stored nearby. Telemetry equipment (receiver, antennas, and "mortality collars") are on order. We will initiate trapping in early January, 1990. Literature Cited caughley, G. 1977. Wiley and Sons. Analysis of vertebrate populations. John 234 pp. Clover, M.R. 1954. A portable deer trap and catch-net. California Fish and Game 40:367-373. Floyd, T.J., L.D. Mech, and P.A. Jordan. 1978. Relating wolf scat content to prey consumed. J. Wildl. Manage. 42:528-532. Heisey, D.M., and T.K. Fuller. 1985. Evaluation of survival and cause-specific mortality rates using telemetry data. J. Wildl. Manage. 49:668-674. Jenkins, K.J. 1985. Winter habitat and niche relationships of sympatric cervids along the North Fork of the Flathead River, Montana. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Idaho, Moscow. 183 pp. McCullough, D.R. 1975. Modification of the Clover deer trap. California Fish and Game 61:242-244. Neff, D.J. 1968. The pellet group for big game trend, census, and distribution: a review. J. Wildl. Manage. 32:597-614. O'Gara, B.W. 1978. Differential characteristics of predator kills. Pages 380-393 In Proc. 8th Biennial Pronghorn Antelope Workshop, Jasper, Alberta. 196 http://repository.uwyo.edu/uwnpsrc_reports/vol13/iss1/35 4

Marcum et al.: Gray Wolf Prey Base Ecology in the North Fork Flathead River Drai Roper, L.A., R. L. Schmidt, and R. B. Gill. 1971. Techniques of trapping and handling mule deer in northern Colorado with notes on using automatic data processing for data analysis. Proc. Western Assoc. Game and Fish Comm. 51:471-477. Sparrowe, R.D., and P.F. Springer. 1970. Seasonal activity patterns of white-tailed deer in eastern South Dakota. J. Wildl. Manage. 34:420-431. Unsworth, J.W., and L. Kuck. 1988. Elk ecology, Study III: Elk sightability. Idaho Dept. Fish & Game, Project w- 160-R-15. Job Progress Report. Wobeser, G.A., and T.R. Spraker. 1980. Post-mortem examination. Pages 89-98 In Schemnitz, s., ed. Wildlife management techniques manual. 4th ed. The Wildl. Soc., Washington, D.C. 197 Published by Wyoming Scholars Repository, 1989 5