It s Been 15 Years Already?!

Similar documents
Managed Lanes: A National Perspective Managed Lane Strategies

Toll Express Lanes for the Research Triangle region Including discussion of possible applications on I-40

Technology and the Changing Face of Tollways

The Future of All Electronic Tolling Brian Patno Raytheon ITS Texas October 26, 2012

What are Managed Lanes?

Managed Lanes: A Popular and Effective Urban Solution. Ed Regan Presented by Susan Buse

Priced Managed Lanes in America. October 2013

A Federal Perspective on Congestion Pricing. Wayne Berman Federal Highway Administration July 8, 2010

Managed Lanes 2017: What They Are and How They Work. Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Policy Reason Foundation

DEVELOPING A POLICY TO PLAN AND OPERATE MANAGED LANES IN NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS: LBJ IN DALLAS COUNTY AND AIRPORT FREEWAY IN TARRANT COUNTY

IMPACTS TO TRANSIT FROM LOS ANGELES CONGESTION REDUCTION DEMONSTRATION. Word Count: 3,386 (body) + 2,000 (8 tables) + 1,500 (6 figures) = 6,886 words

Public Hearing October 21, 2014 University of North Florida Adam W. Herbert University Center Alumni Drive Jacksonville, FL 32224

Overview of 64 Express Lanes. Secretary of Transportation Aubrey Layne April 12, 2017

Managed Lanes: The Fitch Approach. Saavan Gatfield, Senior Director

Preview. Tables in your paper Mass Transit as alternative to auto California s problems in urban transportation

Transit Signal Priority (TSP) Application to Miami-Dade Transit

Preview. Second midterm Tables in your paper Mass Transit as alternative to auto California s problems in urban transportation

DRAFT. The HOV/HOT Alternative: Working Paper #3

Contemporary Approaches in Congestion Pricing:

THE MOST INFORMATIVE EVENT COVERING REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS

The I-85 Express Lanes Project NASCIO Recognition Award Nomination

MnPASS System Today and the Future

IH 85 EXPRESS LANES ATLANTA, GA USDOT Congestion Reduction Demonstration Program Grant ($110M)

405 Express Lanes General Information & Frequently Asked Questions

CONGESTION AROUND THE WORLD

Managed Lanes in California:

MOVEABLE BARRIER. Congestion Management Solutions

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: MANAGED LANES

6/14/2013. Welcome. to the US 75 Corridor Study. Public Meeting. US 75 Corridor Study Area

Managed Lanes Fundamentals and Opportunities. September 12, 2013

Managed (Fast) Lanes Study, Phase III Stakeholder Workshop #1

July 10, :00-11:30 a.m.

I-635 LBJ EAST PROJECT

The I-680 Southbound Express Lane

I-105 ExpressLanes Project

CONGESTED LOS ANGELES

Small Places, Smart Mobility

August 12, The Honorable Edmund G. Brown Jr. Governor, State of California State Capitol Sacramento, CA Dear Governor Brown:

RTA 2013 Leadership Briefing and Tour Report

395 Express Lanes Extension

U.S. Economic and Apartment Market Overview and Outlook. July 15, 2014

Lodging Market Update. Valley Hotel and Resort Association April 13, 2016 Presented by: Robert Hayward

Fundamental Certainty

Presented by: Keith Nichols, PE Principal Transportation Engineer, TTAC Agenda Item #14 October 7, 2015

TRB Managed Lanes Conference May 22 24, 2012, Oakland, CA

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. Continuous Access Priced Managed Lanes: What Have We Learned So Far? Thursday, September 20, :00-3:30 PM ET

I-80 Corridor Overhaul

Hot lane policies and their implications

Sketch Level Assessment. of Traffic Issues. for the Fluor Daniel I-495 HOT Lane Proposal. Ronald F. Kirby

5.0 FACILITY DESIGN. Design Standards

Sustainable Transportation Planning in the Portland Region

I-35W Solutions Alliance Project Update July 13, 2017

5 THINGS TO KNOW IN Vail R. Brown, STR

Fiscal Year Budget Overview

CHAPTER 2G. PREFERENTIAL AND MANAGED LANE SIGNS

Measuring the Distribution and Costs of Congestion. Tim Lomax Texas Transportation Institute

Preferential Lane Use for Heavy Trucks Final report PRC F

Managed Lanes. Steve Schilke, P.E. Major Projects Unit Head District 1. Illinois Traffic Engineering and Safety Conference October 2016

TAMPA BAY EXPRESS (TBX)

Toll Rate Public Hearing

Impact of Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Elements on Managed Lanes Toll Prices

WHAT IFS: Over the course of

1. Operate along freeways, either in regular traffic lanes, in high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, or along the shoulders.

North Hollywood to Pasadena BRT Corridor Technical Study. Eco-Rapid Transit/Orange Line Development Authority March 8, 2017

COUNTYWIDE EXPRESSLANES STRATEGIC PLAN FINAL REPORT

Hard Shoulder Running is a valuable tool July 14, Dean H. Gustafson, PE, PTOE State Operations Engineer VDOT Operations Division

Public Transport and Development: Making It Work

Honolulu Rail Transit Brochure Source List

A simulation study of using active traffic management strategies on congested freeways

Performance Measure Summary - San Jose CA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Freeway Improvement Project

Hotel InduSTRy Overview What Lies Ahead

NYU International Hospitality Industry Investment Conference. Amanda W. Hite STR President & COO

Managed Lanes: A Primer

An Easier Commute. Learn how to use I-77 Express to save you time.

Bike Sharing as Active Transportation

Capital Beltway HOT Lanes - Frequently Asked Questions

High Occupancy Toll Lanes Potential for Implementation in the Atlanta Region

Value Pricing Roadways

UNITED 2026 BID: TRAINING SITE AGREEMENT. Park Board Committee Meeting Monday, February 19, 2018

Enhancing Return on Investment for MnPASS Express Lanes

4 Level of Service Results: HOV and Express Lanes

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

MnPASS Study II. September 2010

Washington DC Section of ITE Project Briefing

National Capital Region Congestion Report

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

Title. Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee December 12, Brad Larson Metro District MnDOT

Presented by: Aziz Elattar Deputy District Director Planning, Public Transportation and Local Assistance October 4, 2013

Public Hearing Tarrant County. October 11 th, 2012

HOT Lanes on Interstate 15 in San Diego: Technology, Impacts and Equity Issues

November 14, Dulles To DC Loop Public-Private Partnership Proposal. Executive Summary

Improving Mobility Without Building More Lanes

Performance Measure Summary - Denver-Aurora CO. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

APPENDIX B Methodology for 2004 Annual Report

Appendix SEA Seattle, Washington 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Transit Operations in the I-95 Express Lanes

DFW MULTIFAMILY TRENDS & OBSERVATIONS Q2 2017

Appendix PIT Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

101 Corridor Managed Lanes

Transcription:

It s Been 15 Years Already?! What We ve Learned from 12 Operational Facilities 14 Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2012.

THEY WORK! May 24, 2012 Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2012. 2

David Ungemah ungemah@pbworld.com May 24, 2012 Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2012. 3

Agenda perations and Design ricing Systems evenue Sufficiency May 24, 2012 Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2012. 4

PERATIONS & DESIGN Lane Separation Access Treatments Hours of Operation May 24, 2012 Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2012. 5

Separation and Access Treatments Initial managed lanes were physically separated with direct access provided SR-91 I-25 I-15 I-10 6/5/2012 Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2011 6

Separation and Access Treatments Today, they are more integrated into the freeway with less physical separation SR-167 I-95 I-85 I-35W 6/5/2012 Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2011 7

Separation and Access Treatments Utilizing buffer separation with multiple access zones, near continuous access, or continuous access I-35W I-85

Varying Designs and Features Project Year Opened Type of Facility Total Lanes Type of Separation Separation Width SR 91, Orange County 1996 Concurrent 4 Buffer + Channelizers 4 ft. I 15, San Diego (original) 1998 Reversible 2 Barrier 22 ft. I 394, Minnesota 2005 Reversible 2 Barrier 12 ft. I 394, Minnesota 2005 Concurrent 2 Buffer 2 ft. I 15, Salt Lake City 2006 Concurrent 2 Buffer 4 ft. I 25, Denver 2006 Reversible 2 Barrier 22 ft. SR 167, Seattle 2008 Concurrent 2 Line 2 ft. I 15, San Diego (extension) 2009 Concurrent 4 Barrier + Moveable 22 ft. I 10, Houston 2009 Concurrent 4 Buffer + Channelizers 14 ft. I 95, Miami 2009 Concurrent 4 Buffer + Channelizers 2 ft. I 35W, Minnesota 2010 Concurrent 2 Line None I 680, Alameda County 2010 Concurrent 1 Buffer 4 ft. I 85, Atlanta 2011 Concurrent 1 Buffer 2 ft. SR 237 / I 880, San Jose 2012 Concurrent 2 Buffer 2 ft. I 45 South, Houston 2012 Reversible 1 Barrier 3 ft. May 24, 2012 Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2012. 9

Hours of Operation Almost all HOT lanes operate fulltime. Exceptions: Late evening / early morning toll-free (I-680, SR-167) Reversible facilities close to change direction (I-15, I-25) Off-peak revert to general-purpose use (I-394, I-35W) I-10 May 24, 2012 Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2012. 10

Operations & Design: Lessons Learned Design and Operations have evolved from HOV systems to meet the requirements of pricing and active management National trends Extensive planning for buffer separation Limited consideration of barrier separation Incorporation of Active Traffic Management Differing design philosophies on access May 24, 2012 Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2012. 11

RICING SYSTEMS Occupancy Policies Pricing Methodologies May 24, 2012 Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2012. 12

Occupancy Policies 1997 2008: Adoption of pre-existing HOV requirements 2009 current: Modify or drop HOV requirements HOV-2+ free at all times HOV-2+ free peak only HOV-3+ with restrictions HOV-3+ discount I-15 (SD) I-10 (TX) I-95 (FL) SR-91* I-394 I-45 I-85 I-635 I-15 (SLC) I-495 I-35E I-25 SR-91* SR 167 I-35W I-680 SR-237 / I-880 May 24, 2012 Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2012. 13

Occupancy Policies Enforcement Visual enforcement still primary means License plate recognition for tolling Mandatory or switchable transponders Monitoring Registration programs Unrestricted use erodes active management SR-91 May 24, 2012 Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2012. 14

Pricing Mechanisms Static / flat price Interim on I-15 (San Diego and Salt Lake City), I-10 (Houston) Variable time of day SR-91, I-25, I-10, I-45 South Variable dynamic Most contemporary facilities May 24, 2012 Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2012. 15

Pricing Mechanisms Collection mechanisms Sticker pass Electronic toll collection License plate tolling Interoperability May 24, 2012 Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2012. 16

Pricing Systems: Lessons Learned The pricing of managed lanes still largely reflects additive features, with legacy HOV preference policies National trends Abandonment of static / flat monthly pricing Dynamic pricing systems Re-evaluation of HOV-free policies Legitimizing non-account users May 24, 2012 Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2012. 17

EVENUE SUFFICIENCY Gross Revenue O&M Costs May 24, 2012 Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2012. 18

Gross Revenue Key variables Net capacity Travel time savings Travel time reliability SR-167 May 24, 2012 Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2012. 19

Successful Facilities are in Top 15 Congested Regions INRIX Metro Congestion Rankings Corridor Design Region 2010 2009 2008 2007 I 15 (CA) Express Lanes 2 reversible; 3+1 concur San Diego 13 17 15 14 I 15 (UT) Express Lanes 1+1 concurrent Salt Lake City 57 51 49 44 SR 91 Express Lanes 2+2 concurrent Orange County 1 1 1 1 I 25 Express Lanes 2 reversible Denver 15 16 16 18 SR 167 HOT Lanes 1+1 concurrent Seattle 10 9 9 9 I 680 Express Lanes 1 concurrent Oakland 18 19 19 20 I 95 Express Lanes 2+2 concurrent Miami 15 13 13 11 I 85 HOT Lanes 1+1 concurrent Atlanta 12 12 12 10 I 10 (TX) Managed lanes 2+2 concurrent Houston 7 6 4 7 I 394 MnPass Lanes 1+1 concurrent; 2 rev Minneapolis 11 11 10 13 I 35W MnPass Lanes 1+1 concurrent Minneapolis 11 11 10 13 I 495 Express Lanes 2+2 concurrent Washington DC 4 4 6 4 I 10 (CA) Express Lanes 2+2 concurrent Los Angeles 1 1 1 1 I 110 Express Lanes 2+2 concurrent Los Angeles 1 1 1 1 I 635 Managed Lanes 3+3 concurrent Dallas 5 5 5 5 May 24, 2012 Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2012. 20

Successful Facilities are on Highly Congested Corridors Corridor Design Region Ranking INRIX / TTI Top 328 Congested Corridors PH Delay (min) Delay / Mile I 15 (CA) Express Lanes 2 reversible; 3+1 concur San Diego I 15 (UT) Express Lanes 1+1 concurrent Salt Lake City SR 91 Express Lanes 2+2 concurrent Orange County 2 60 2.90 I 25 Express Lanes 2 reversible Denver 74 24 1.59 SR 167 HOT Lanes 1+1 concurrent Seattle 124 13 1.78 I 680 Express Lanes 1 concurrent Oakland 99 27 2.84 I 95 Express Lanes 2+2 concurrent Miami I 85 HOT Lanes 1+1 concurrent Atlanta 160 11 2.97 I 10 (TX) Managed lanes 2+2 concurrent Houston 73 12 2.73 I 394 MnPass Lanes 1+1 concurrent; 2 rever Minneapolis 265 6 1.82 I 35W MnPass Lanes 1+1 concurrent Minneapolis 122 16 2.08 I 495 Express Lanes 2+2 concurrent Washington DC 19 47 2.27 I 10 (CA) Express Lanes 2+2 concurrent Los Angeles 10 32 2.50 I 110 Express Lanes 2+2 concurrent Los Angeles 33 13 4.19 I 635 Managed Lanes 3+3 concurrent Dallas 105 21 1.26 May 24, 2012 Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2012. 21

Annual Gross Revenue (2011 $) Differs Widely I 35W MnPass Lanes I 394 MnPass Lanes I 10 (TX) Managed lanes I 85 HOT Lanes I 95 Express Lanes I 680 Express Lanes SR 167 HOT Lanes I 25 Express Lanes SR 91 Express Lanes I 15 (UT) Express Lanes I 15 (CA) Express Lanes May 24, 2012 Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2012. 22

More Consistency with O&M Costs (per mile) $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $247,632 Estimated (2010) Actual (2009) $150,000 $118,417 $100,000 $96,062 $75,119 $84,672 $97,199 $50,000 $ Bay Area Seattle SR 167 OCTA SR 91 Colorado I 25 Miami I 95 San Diego I 15 May 24, 2012 Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2012. 23

Revenue Sufficiency: Lessons Learned Priced managed lanes generate revenue, but many barely break even against O&M costs and few generate significant funds for capital National trends Successful facilities are on congested corridors Few projects provide SR-91-like revenue New capacity in highly congested corridors generates more gross revenue O&M costs are falling on a per-mile basis May 24, 2012 Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2012. 24

FINAL THOUGHTS May 24, 2012 Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2012. 25

What If We Could Provide more capacity over time without significant new capital? Empower state and local governments to invest in demand management? Right-size our highway system, so as to reduce project costs and other impacts? May 24, 2012 Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2012. 26

David Ungemah ungemah@pbworld.com May 24, 2012 Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2012. 27