The Role of Zoos in the Rehabilitation of Animals in the Circus Brij Kishor Gupta & Bipul Chakraborty Published online: 04 Jun 2010.

Similar documents
Henry K. Van Offelen a, Charles C. Krueger a & Carl L. Schofield a a Department of Natural Resources, College of Agriculture and

Guidelines on Minimum Dimensions of Enclosures for Housing Exotic Animals of Different Species Central Zoo Authority dsunzh; fpfm+;k?kj izkf/kdj.

Carter G. Kruse a, Wayne A. Hubert a & Frank J. Rahel b a U.S. Geological Survey Wyoming Cooperative Fish and. Available online: 09 Jan 2011

ANIMAL EXHIBITOR PERMIT NUMBER: EX PERMIT NUMBER MUST BE SUPPLIED. Business Name. Owner Name. Business Address MUST BE PROVIDED

CHAPTER 5 ANIMALS AND FOWL 1 ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL

CONSERVATION OF PLANTS & ANIMALS

Concept paper on In-situ ex-situ linkage -Conservation Breeding of Endangered Wild Animal Species in India

Submission of statutory Annual Report of the Nehru Pheasantry to the Central Zoo Authority for the year regarding.

SUPPLEMENT No. 2 TO THE SOVEREIGN BASE AREAS GAZETTE No of 8th March 2013 LEGISLATION

LIMERICK CITY & COUNTY COUNCIL

BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OREGON ORDINANCE NO.

MEMO. Commercial or Non-Commercial Breeder Applicant Law Enforcement Division Breeder s Licenses for Raising Animals

The Domestic Game Farm Animal Regulations

THE WILDLIFE (PROTECTION) ACT, 1972

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 79/409/EC. of 2 April on the conservation of the wild birds

IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS OF THE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION LAW. Authorized by the Republic of China Wildlife Conservation Law, amended October 29, 1994.

Exotic Wildlife Association Membership Alert

To cite this article: Marc Bekoff (1999) Jinxed Lynx?, Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 2:3, , DOI: /s jaws0203_6

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2006 Session. FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE Revised

CHAPTER W-14 - WILDLIFE REHABILITATION INDEX

(No. 176) (Approved August 1, 2004) AN ACT

6:04:50 (1994): This ordinance shall not apply to exhibits deemed educational by the Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.

CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS

Contents. Foreword. For: The world needs zoos Against: Replace zoos with something better. For: Safety first Against: Whatever happened to privacy?

APPLICATION FOR CITES REGISTRATION OF A CAPTIVE BREEDING OPERATION

IOWA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

LEGAL ASPECTS OF THE EXOTIC PET TRADE. Camille Labchuk, Barrister & Solicitor

THE WILDLIFE (TRANSACTION AND TAXIDERMY) RULES, 1973

IC Chapter 34. Nongame and Endangered Species Conservation

The Outfitter and Guide Regulations, 1996

CITY OF FERNDALE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL

NATIONAL: SUPPORT FOR CIRCUS ANIMAL BAN

VILLAGE OF STIRLING IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA Bylaw No Animal Control Bylaw

Farm Animals Breeding Act 1

REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA LAW ON WILDLIFE. November 6, 1997 No. VIII-498. Vilnius CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS

FISH AND GAME PROTECTION ACT KEEPING OF WILDLIFE IN CAPTIVITY REGULATIONS

Risk of spread after introduction of the virus in to wild boar population

Biodiversity Conservation at Al Ain Zoo

REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RESOLUTION Conf (Rev. CoP 15) CONSERVATION OF AND TRADE IN TIGERS AND OTHER APPENDIX-I ASIAN BIG CAT SPECIES

Humane State Ranking 2016 (Montana through Wyoming)

United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Inspection Report. Customer ID:

inc SIMON JACKSON Nature conservation Fact sheet 14

2000 AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE FREE-RESPONSE QUESTIONS

Animal Health Risks Associated with Importing and keeping Exotic Animals in Europe

CHAPTER 169 CAPTIVE WILDLIFE

The Fur Farming Regulations

Official Journal of the European Union

Humane State Ranking 2018 (Montana through Wyoming)

Humane State Ranking 2018 (Alabama through Missouri)

Humane State Ranking 2017 (Alabama through Missouri)

DECREE THE GOVERNMENT. Pursuant to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora; DECREES: Chapter I

UK Wildlife Legislation & Collections. Paolo Viscardi

AN ASSESSMENT ON THE WELFARE STATUS OF ENDANGERED TERRESTRIAL MAMMALS AT NEPAL CENTRAL ZOO

Humane State Ranking 2014 (Montana through Wyoming, plus DC and PR)

[First Reprint] SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 216th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED APRIL 28, 2014

IUCN Guidelines for the Placement of Confiscated Animals

EX-SITU CONSERVATION. Lecture By: Mr. N.Baskar

4. Instruction in telemetry requires IACUC review if live vertebrates are used in the training session. a. True b. False

DEC :52 FR INflC:SOUTH SK TO Ochapowace Law

Controlled Wildlife Products and Trade Act 9 of 2008 section 9

TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT 1989

Original language: English CoP17 Doc CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA

Proposed Response to Act 170 of the Legislative Session. Related to Changes to 10 V.S.A and 4254c September 6, 2018

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, the feeding of wildlife can lead to negative impacts on animals, people and the environment; and

Regulations relating to Establishment, Operation and Disease-Prevention Measures at Fish Farms (Operation and Diseases Regulations)

Humane State Ranking 2012 (Montana through Wyoming, plus DC)

POLICY STATEMENT PROVISION OF PERMITS TO VETERINARIANS TO PROVIDE SERVICES IN THE NEW SOUTH WALES THOROUGHBRED RACING INDUSTRY

Regional District of Central Okanagan. Bylaw No.1 028

(2) Cattle means any of the various animals of the domesticated genus Bos.

Yukon Mandatory Cervid Chronic Wasting Disease Surveillance Program

Humane State Ranking 2013 (Alabama through Missouri)

TITLE: Ordinance Relating to the Keeping and Feeding of Wild Animals - 2nd Reading

Fisheries, Wildlife, Migratory Birds and Renewable Resources Act

[Docket No. FWS HQ IA ; ; ABC Code: C6] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Reinstatement of the Regulation that

Norms and Standards. Moratorium. Regulations. Constitution NEMA NEMBA. Trade in rhino horn. CITES Regs

African Conservation Experience

CHAPTER W-13 - POSSESSION OF WILDLIFE, SCIENTIFIC COLLECTING AND SPECIAL LICENSES INDEX #1300 DEFINITIONS 1 #1301 POSSESSION 1

Publication details Robert A. Douglas Published online on: 08 Dec 2015

Presentation Eunice Robai. The Endangered Species

A Risk-based Audit of the Captive/Privatelyowned Cervid Industry in Michigan

Captive Wildlife Draft Rules

TITLE 35. OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD, AND FORESTRY CHAPTER 15. ANIMAL INDUSTRY SUBCHAPTER 34. FERAL SWINE

The City has been approached by several individuals about the destruction of their fruits and vegetables.

The Protection of Animals in Thailand--An Insight into Animal Protection Legislation

Hunting Preserves FINAL RULE LANGUAGE Consent Agenda Item 4 September 26, 2018

GOVERNMENT NOTICES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS AND TOURISM

Hunting on the Buffalo Point Indian Reserve Bylaw Number

ARKANSAS REGULATION FOR TRICHOMONIASIS TESTING AND MOVEMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR CATTLE

WILDLIFE AND MIGRATORY BIRDS REGULATION

Animal Welfare in Wildlife Conservation

9-1 What Role Do Humans Play in the Premature Extinction of Species?

Laws of the People's Republic of China Governing Foreign-Related Matters Volume II

I!J!"''' Statement of receipts and payments for the year ended 30 June Wildlife At Risk "\I

Controlled Take (Special Status Game Mammal Chapter)

H. R. To provide for the protection of the last remaining herd of wild and genetically pure American Buffalo. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES A BILL

Chesterfield Golf Club Buggy Policy 1 May 2018

MONTGOMERY COUNTY S RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR THE KEEPING OF WILD ANIMALS IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS

Became a law March 15, 2005, with the approval of the Governor. Passed by a majority vote, three-fifths being present.

BIODIVERSITY LAW: A factsheet by the ACT EDO 2010

Transcription:

This article was downloaded by: [Dr Kenneth Shapiro] On: 09 June 2015, At: 06:37 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/haaw20 The Role of Zoos in the Rehabilitation of Animals in the Circus Brij Kishor Gupta & Bipul Chakraborty Published online: 04 Jun 2010. To cite this article: Brij Kishor Gupta & Bipul Chakraborty (2005) The Role of Zoos in the Rehabilitation of Animals in the Circus, Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 8:4, 285-294, DOI: 10.1207/s15327604jaws0804_5 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327604jaws0804_5 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the Content ) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http:// www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL WELFARE SCIENCE, 8(4), 285 294 Copyright 2005, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. COMMENTARY The Role of Zoos in the Rehabilitation of Animals in the Circus Brij Kishor Gupta and Bipul Chakraborty Central Zoo Authority New Delhi, India In 1998, the government of India enforced a ban on performance/exhibition of 5 species of nonhuman animals: (a) lions, (b) tigers, (c) leopards, (d) bears, and (e) monkeys. The Ministry of Environment and Forests gave the responsibility to the Central Zoo Authority (CZA) for rehabilitation of these animals. Between 1999 and 2001, the CZA created rescue centers for rehabilitation of lions and tigers in the off-display areas of 5 zoos: (a) Bangalore, (b) Chennai, (c) Vishakhapatnam, (d) Tirupathi, and (e) Jaipur. Today, the CZA has rehabilitated 314 lions and tigers from circuses. The CZA has been meeting the expenses toward maintenance (feeding of and providing health care for) of the animals, outsourcing of staff, and maintaining enclosures. This article focuses on the mammoth work that the selected zoos had to carry out in rehabilitating the lions and tigers from the circuses. Throughout history, humans have hunted nonhuman animals in the wild for consumption and sport. They also have captured these animals to exhibit in zoos for human amusement and enjoyment. Traditionally, a zoo is a place that people visit to satisfy their curiosity and view specimens of exotic wild animals. In the past few decades, however, the focus of zoos has undergone a dramatic change, brought about by two main factors. The first, a change in public attitude and perception toward zoos, began in the early 1960s along with a surge in the animal rights movement. The second factor is the increased difficulty in procuring wild animals as these animals become more rare in the wild for exhibition in Correspondence should be sent to Brij Kishor Gupta, Scientist, Central Zoo Authority, Annex VI, Bikaner House, Shahjahan Road, New Delhi, India 110 011. Email: brijkishor68@yahoo.com

286 GUPTA AND CHAKRABORTY zoos. Coupled with this is an increased awareness and recognition, particularly in the last 25 years, of the damage human activity has caused to the earth s biodiversity. This awareness has turned public opinion against acquisition of animals in the wild for exhibition in zoos. The role of the modern zoo thus has changed from entertainment and amusement to the conservation of endangered species and the education of the public in conservation and environmental issues. Following the Central Zoo Authority s (CZA) admission of rescue centers involved in the rehabilitation and lifetime care into the fold of zoos, animal welfare and wildlife rehabilitation have been added to the list of other objectives; namely, captive breeding, conservation education, research, and reintroduction. However, rescue centers by definition are different from zoos. The term Rescue center denotes an establishment for the care of animals specified in the Schedules to the Act 1 and not open for exhibition to the public. The CZA was established in the year 1992 under the Wild Life (Protection) Act of 1972 to oversee and monitor the functioning of the zoos in the country. Now, standards have been laid down for proper housing, upkeep, and health care of the wild animals in circuses, so that all the welfare factors of the animals are taken care of in captivity (see the Appendix). As a result, improvements also have been made in animal management techniques, with larger, more naturalistic enclosures and the development of animal enrichment methods to combat boredom and stereotypic behaviors. This article focuses on how the Indian zoos have played an important role in the rehabilitation of wild animals from the circuses. REHABILITATION OF ANIMALS IN THE CIRCUS As per the National Zoo Policy of 1998, objectives of the zoos have been identified as follows: 1. Supporting the conservation of endangered species by giving species that have no chance of survival in the wild a last chance through coordinated breeding under ex situ conditions and by raising stocks for rehabilitating the wild animals as, and when, it is appropriate and desirable. 2. Inspiring empathy for wild animals among zoo visitors, understanding and awareness about the need for conservation of natural resources, and maintaining the ecological balance. 1 The Schedules of the Act provides protection to wild animals. The Government of India has categorized the species under Schedules I, II, III, IV, V, and VI.

REHABILITATION OF ANIMALS IN THE CIRCUS 287 3. Providing opportunities for scientific studies useful for conservation in general and creating a database for sharing among the agencies involved in in situ and ex situ conservation. Zoos also function as rescue centers for marooned and orphaned wild animals. The establishment of a rescue center within a zoo shall be subject to the availability of appropriate housing and upkeep infrastructure. Where appropriate housing and upkeep are not available, state governments and the central government will ascertain setting up rescue facilities in the off-display area of the zoo, subject to the availability of land. Pursuant to the objective for providing shelter to rescued animals, standards have been laid down for the operation of such centers (see the Appendix). The Indian zoos faced a challenging task when the Honorable Supreme Court imposed a ban on the use of five species of wild animals; namely, (a) lion, (b) tiger, (c) leopard, (d) bear, and (e) monkey (Government of India Notification No. 395, dated October 14, 1998). The ban was imposed because wild animals were subjected to unnecessary pain caused during performance in circuses, lifelong imprisonment in small cages, and the stress to which they were subjected during transport from one place to another. Consequent to this ban on performance of wild animals in circuses, the Ministry of Environment and Forests entrusted the responsibility for rehabilitation of these wild animals to the CZA. The government of India had put restrictions on the infrastructural cost for creating a rescue facility for the wild animals received from circuses. Costs were to be kept to a minimum. Therefore, it was decided that facilities should be created as part of existing zoos in off-display areas. A decision was made to rehabilitate only 300 lions and tigers. In 1999, the CZA invited proposals from the state governments of Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, and Orissa for creation of off-site, lifetime-care facilities for the animals near the existing zoos. As the number of leopards, bears, and monkeys with circuses were few, it was decided to request existing zoos in the country that already had the expertise in managing captive wild animals. In the meantime, the Ministry of Environment and Forests had directed all the state governments to take possession of the five species banned for performances in circuses and make arrangements for their rehabilitation in the designated rescue centers. A few of the major circuses, however, had moved to the Indian Courts and the Apex Court for obtaining a stay on the directives on seizing their animals issued by the Ministry of Environment and Forests. However, this action of the circus companies did not hinder the creation of rescue facilities. The rescue facility at Bannerghatta was the first to be created, and animals surrendered by small circuses

TABLE 1 Summary Breakup of Animals Rehabilitated in Various Rescue Centers Name of the Zoo/Rescue Facility Total Capacity for Housing the Circus Animals No. of Lions So Far Rehabilitated No. of Tigers So Far Rehabilitated 1. Bannerghatta National Park,Bangalore, Karnataka 2. Arignar Anna Zoological Park, Vandalur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 3. Indira Gandhi Zoological Park, Vishakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh 4. SriVenkateswara Zoological Park, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh 5. Nahargarh Biological Park, Jaipur, Rajasthan 100 93 5 60 51 8 60 47 12 60 60 2 50 30 15 281 42 330 Note. There are following two more new facilities that are being set up for rehabilitation of animals: Van Vihar Zoo, Bhopal, which has a capacity for 58 (30 lions, 20 tigers, 8 bears) animals, and South Khairbari, Cooch Behar, West Bengal, which has a capacity for 30 (15 lions and 15 tigers) animals. TABLE 2 Minimum Prescribed Size for Feeding/Retiring Cubicle for Important Mammalian Species of Captive Animals Size of Feeding Cubicle/Night Shelter a Size of Feeding Cubicle/Night Shelter a Name of Species Length Breadth Height Name of Species Length Breadth Height Family: Felide Family: Equidae Tiger & lions 2.75 1.80 3.00 Wild ass 4.0 2.0 2.5 Panther 2.00 1.50 2.00 Colouded leopard 1.50 2.00 Family: Ursidae & snow leopard 2.00 Small cats 1.80 1.50 1.50 All type of Indian bears 2.5 1.8 2.0 Family: Elephantidae Family: Canidae Elephant 8.0 6.0 Jackal, wolf, & 5.5 wild dog 2.0 1.5 1.5 Family: Family: Vivirridae Rhinocerotidae One-horned Indian rhinoceros 5.0 3.0 2.5 Palm civet 2.0 1.0 1.0 (continued) 288

TABLE 2 Continued Size of Feeding Cubicle/Night Shelter a Size of Feeding Cubicle/Night Shelter a Name of Species Length Breadth Height Name of Species Length Breadth Height Family: Cervidae Large Indian civet & binturong 2.0 1.5 1.0 Brow antlered deer 3.0 2.0 2.5 Family: Mustellidae Hangul 3.0 2.0 2.5 Otters all types 2.5 1.5 1.0 Swamp deer 3.0 2.0 2.5 Ratel/hogbadger 2.5 1.5 1.0 Musk deer 2.5 1.5 2.0 Martens 2.0 1.5 1.0 Mouse deer 1.5 1.0 1.5 Family: Bovidae Family: Procyonide Nilgiri tahr 2.5 1.5 2.0 Red panda 3.0 1.5 1.0 Chinkara 2.5 1.5 2.0 Four horned Family: Lorisidae antelope 2.5 1.5 2.0 Wild buffalo 3.0 1.5 2.0 Slow loris and slender loris 1.0 1.0 1.5 Indian bison 3.0 2.0 2.5 Yak 4.0 2.0 2.5 Family: Cercopithecidae Bharal, goral, wild sheep, and markhor 2.5 1.5 2.0 Monkeys and langurs 2.0 1.0 1.5 Note. The dimensions have been given only in respect to the species that are commonly displayed in zoos. No dimensions for outdoor enclosure have been prescribed for chinkara and chowsingha because of the problem of in-fighting injuries. These animals may be kept in battery type enclosures of the dimensions suggested by the Central Zoo Authority. The designs of enclosures for Schedule I species, not covered in this table, should be finalized only after approval of the Central Zoo Authority. a Given in meters. 289

TABLE 3 Minimum Prescribed Size for Outdoor Open Enclosure for Important Mammalian Species of Captive Animals SI No. Name of the Species Minimum Size of Outdoor Enclosure a Minimum Area Extra per Additional Animal b Family: Felidae 1. Tiger and lions 1,000 250 2. Panther 500 60 3. Clouded leopard 400 40 4. Snow leopard 450 50 Family: Rhinocerotidae 5. One-horned Indian rhinoceros 2,000 375 Family: Cervidae 6. Brow antlered deer 1,500 125 7. Hangu 1,500 125 8. Swamp deer 1,500 125 Family: Bovidae 9. Wild buffalo 1,500 200 10. Indian bison 1,500 200 11. Bharal, goral, wild sheep, and serow 350 75 Family: Equidae 12. Wild ass 1,500 200 Family: Ursidae 13. All types of Indian bears 1,000 100 Family: Canidae 14. Jackal, wolf, and wild dog 400 50 Family: Procyonidae 15. Red panda 300 30 Family: Cercopithecidae 16. Monkeys and langurs 500 20 Note. The dimensions have been given only in respect to the species that are commonly displayed in zoos. No dimensions for outdoor enclosure have been prescribed for chinkara (Gazella gazelle bennetti) and chowsingha (Tetracerous quadricornis) because of the problem of in-fighting injuries. These animals may be kept in battery-type enclosures of the dimensions suggested by the Central Zoo Authority. The designs of enclosures for Schedule 1 species, not covered in this table, should be finalized only after approval of the Central Zoo Authority. a Given in square meters and are per pair. b Given in square meters. 290

REHABILITATION OF ANIMALS IN THE CIRCUS 291 were rehabilitated at this facility. By 2000, the other four rescue centers were ready to receive the animals. By November 2004, the CZA had received 255 lions and 59 tigers from various circuses throughout the country (see Tables 1, 2, and 3). The circus animals rehabilitation has come a long way in a short time. These rescue centers provide confiscated animals humane treatment and dignified coexistence until their death. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank P. R. Sinha, Director, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun and Brij Raj Sharma, Member Secretary, Central Zoo Authority, New Delhi for providing the encouragement and support in preparation of this article. REFERENCES Government of India Notification G.S.R. No. 619(E), Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of India (1998). National Zoo Policy of 1998. Government of India, Gazette of India, Extra Ordinary No. 708 (1998). The Wildlife Protection Act. Act No. 53 of 1972. September 1972. Available from http://www. indialawinfo.com/bareacts/wildlife.html APPENDIX Recognition and Standards for Rescue Centres As Provided Under the Recognition of Zoo Rules, 1992 Definition (under the Wild Life [Protection] Act, 1972): Rescue Center is an establishment for the care of animals specified in the Schedules to the Act and not open for exhibition to the public. Recognition 1. For recognition of a rescue center, an application under section 38H of the Act for recognition of a Rescue Center shall be made to the Central Zoo Authority in Form A. 2. Every application shall be accompanied by the prescribed fee of Rs. 500/-and shall contain clear particulars as to the matters specified in Form A. 3. Before granting recognition to a rescue center under section 38H of the act, the Central Zoo Authority may make such inquiries and require such further information to be furnished, as it deems necessary, relating to the information furnished by the zoo in its application in Form A.

292 GUPTA AND CHAKRABORTY 4. The recognition granted to a rescue center shall be subject to the following conditions, namely: 4a) That the recognition, unless granted on a permanent basis, shall be for such period not less than one year as may be specified in the recognition. 4b) That the rescue center shall comply with such standards and norms as are, or may be, prescribed or imposed under the provisions of the Act and these rules from time to time. 5. For renewal of recognition, three months before the expiry of the period of recognition, a recognized rescue center desirous of renewal of such recognition may make an application to the Central Zoo Authority in Form A. 6. The Central Zoo Authority shall grant recognition with due regard to the interests of protection and conservation of wildlife and such standards, norms, and other matters as are specified in Recognition of Zoo Rules. Standards 1. The primary objective to operate the rescue center shall be conservation of wildlife, and no rescue center shall allow any activity that is not consistent with the well being of the wild animals. 2. No rescue center shall allow any animal to be subjected to the cruelties prohibited under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 (59 of 1960). 3. Animals pertaining to species whose performance has been banned under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 (59 of 1960), shall not be transported from place to place. 4. Rescue centers may accept wild animals brought to them under intimation to the Chief Wild Life Warden. 5. Every rescue center shall have one full-time officer in-charge of the zoo. The said officer shall be delegated adequate administrative and financial powers to purchase feed and medicine and carry out emergency repair of animal enclosures, as may be necessary for proper upkeep and care of zoo animals. 6. Every rescue center shall have at least one full-time veterinarian to look after the animals. The veterinarian should have minimum educational qualification of B.V.Sc and animal husbandry with diploma in zoo and wildlife animal healthcare management or masters degree in Wildlife Disease and management from a recognized university and should be duly registered with the State Veterinary Council or Veterinary Council of India. 7. All animal enclosures in a rescue center shall be so designed as fully to ensure the safety of animals and caretakers. 8. All animal enclosures in a rescue center shall be so designed as to meet the biological requirements of the animals housed therein. The enclosures shall be of such size as to ensure that the animals get space for their free movement

REHABILITATION OF ANIMALS IN THE CIRCUS 293 and exercise and the animals within herds and groups are not unduly dominated by individuals. In case of species that cannot be kept in groups due to behavioral or biological reasons, separate enclosures shall be provided for each animal. The enclosures shall not be smaller than the dimensions given in AnnexuresA&Bofthese rules (see Tables 2 and 3, respectively). 9. Rescue Center operators shall provide appropriate screening between the adjacent enclosures to safeguard against the animals getting exited or stressed because of the visibility of animals in other enclosures. 10. Every mammal in the rescue center shall be provided food inside a feeding cell/retiring cubicle or feeding kraal. The number and size of feeding cells or kraals also will be such that the dominant animals do not deprive other animals from getting adequate food. The endangered mammalian species shall be provided individual feeding cells or night shelters of the dimensions as specified in the Appendix to these rules. Each cubicle or cell shall have resting, feeding, drinking water, and exercising facilities according to the biological needs of the species. Proper ventilation and lighting for the comfort and well being of animals shall be provided in each cell or cubicle or enclosure. 11. Each rescue center shall ensure timely supply of wholesome and unadulterated food in sufficient quantity to each animal according to the requirement of the individual animals, so that no animal remains undernourished. 12. Every rescue center shall provide for a proper waste disposal system for treating both the solid and liquid wastes generated in the zoos. 13. All leftover food items, animal excreta, and rubbish shall be removed from each enclosure regularly and disposed of in a manner congenial to the general cleanliness of the zoo. 14. The rescue center operators shall make available a round-the-clock supply of potable water for drinking purposes in each cell/enclosure/cubicle. 15. Periodic application of disinfectants in each enclosure shall be made according to the directions of the authorized veterinary officer of the zoo. 16. The animals shall be handled only by the staff having experience and training in handling the individual animals. Every care shall be taken to avoid discomfort, behavioral stress, or physical harm to any animal. 17. The condition and health of all animals in the rescue center shall be checked every day by the person in-charge of their care. If any animal is found sick, injured, or unduly stressed, the matter shall be reported to the veterinary officer for providing treatment expeditiously. 18. Routine examination, including parasite checks, shall be carried out regularly; preventive medicines, including vaccination, shall be administered at such intervals as may be decided by the authorized veterinary officers. 19. The rescue center operators shall arrange for medical check-ups of the staff responsible for upkeep of animals at least once every 6 months to ensure that they do not have infectious diseases that can infect the zoo animals.

294 GUPTA AND CHAKRABORTY 20. Each rescue center shall maintain animal history sheets and treatment cards in respect of each animal of endangered species, identified by the Central Zoo Authority. 21. Every rescue facility shall have a treatment room with basic diagnostic facilities, a comprehensive range of drugs, and a reference library on animal health care and upkeep. Each veterinary unit shall have isolation and quarantine wards to take care of newly arriving animals and sick animals so as to minimize the chances of infections spreading to other animals of the zoo. 22. Every rescue center operator shall provide one qualified laboratory assistant/compounder for assisting the veterinarian in the health care of the zoo animals. 23. Every rescue center shall have facilities for restraining and handling wild animals. 24. Any animal who dies in a rescue center shall be subjected to a detailed post-mortem operation by a veterinarian registered with the State Veterinary Council or Veterinary Council of India, and the findings of such operation shall be recorded and maintained for a period of at least 6 years. 25. Each rescue center shall have a proper facility for disposal of carcasses without affecting the hygiene of the zoo. However, carcasses of large cats shall be disposed of only by burning in presence of the director or an officer not below the rank of a curator duly authorized by the director. 26. Every zoo shall keep in its collection only such number of animals and such species for which appropriate housing facility exists. The zoo operators shall be responsible for ensuring that the number of animals of any species does not go beyond the holding capacity of the enclosures available in the zoo and that housing standards are not compromised for keeping the excessive numbers. 27. To safeguard against uncontrolled growth in the population of prolifically breeding animals, every rescue center shall implement appropriate population control measures such as separation of sexes, sterilization, vasectomy, and implanting of pallets. 28. Every rescue center shall keep a record of the birth, acquisitions, sales, disposals, and deaths of all animals. The inventory of the animals housed in each rescue center as of March 31 of every year shall be submitted to the Central Zoo Authority by April 30 of the same year. 29. Every rescue center also shall submit a brief summary of the death of animals in the zoo for every financial year, together with the reasons of death identified on the basis of post-mortem reports and other diagnostic tests, by April 30 of the following year. In case of death of critically endangered species, a report, together with details specified above, shall be submitted to the Central Zoo Authority within 24 hours.