Development of tether mooring type underwater robots: Anchor diver I and II

Similar documents
Mitsui Engineering & Shipbuilding Co., LTD. Kenji NAGAHASHI

BACKGROUND TO STUDY CASE

NT09-21 Cruise Report SURUGA-BAY Cable Laying Experiment / VBCS Function Test

Tether-based Robot Locomotion Experiments in REX-J mission

Research on Key Technologies of Small Underwater Robots

Saab Seaeye Cougar XT Compact

STUDY OF UNDERWATER THRUSTER (UT) FRONT COVER OF MSI300 AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLE (AUV) USING FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS (FEA)

Vision Based Autonomous Underwater Vehicle for Pipeline Tracking

Underwater Robots Jenny Gabel

A NEW APPROACH TO BUCKLING DETECTION IN OFFSHORE PIPELINE LAYING

Study on Marine Propeller Running in Bubbly Flow

PropaGator Autonomous Surface Vehicle

Scanning Sonar and ROV Operations. For Underwater SAR Imaging Applications

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 112 (2015 )

PROPOSING A NEW PORTABLE DEVICE FOR BRIDGE SCOUR INSPECTION

Development of 7,000m Class ROV KAIKO7000

Evaluation of Underwater Positioning by Hanged ROV from USV

Sensors and Platforms for Autonomous Undersea Systems

EPICYCLIC POWERED BICYCLE

Journal of Marine Science, Engineering & Technology Webpage: JMSET 2018, Vol. 1

A Distributed Control System using CAN bus for an AUV

IAC-04-IAA DESIGN OF A HIGH-TENSION ELASTICALLY DEFORMING SPACE TETHER DEPLOYER

Saving Energy with Buoyancy and Balance Control for Underwater Robots with Dynamic Payloads

Computer Aided Drafting, Design and Manufacturing Volume 26, Number 2, June 2016, Page 53. The design of exoskeleton lower limbs rehabilitation robot

Exploration of Underwater Volcano by Autonomous Underwater Vehicle

Development of Fish type Robot based on the Analysis of Swimming Motion of Bluefin Tuna Comparison between Tuna-type Fin and Rectangular Fin -

Proposal for a Design of a Autonomous Bridge-Mapping Hydroplane

The below identified patent application is available for licensing. Requests for information should be addressed to:

ROV Development ROV Function. ROV Crew Navigation IRATECH SUB SYSTEMS 2010

Overview: Underwater sensing

S u p e r G N O M P R O The new line of GNOM ROVs for professional uses. The wide range of the additional equipment can be installed.

0TMS Design and analysis of ITB ultra deep ROV

A Study on Roll Damping of Bilge Keels for New Non-Ballast Ship with Rounder Cross Section

A Method for Accurate Ballasting of an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Robert Chavez 1, Brett Hobson 2, Ben Ranaan 2

A Study on the End-Effector Exchange Mechanism of a Space Robot

Spring Locomotion Concepts. Roland Siegwart, Margarita Chli, Martin Rufli. ASL Autonomous Systems Lab. Autonomous Mobile Robots

Pioneer Array Micro-siting Public Input Process Frequently Asked Questions

Stevpris installation

Robot motion by simultaneously wheel and leg propulsion

Algorithm for Line Follower Robots to Follow Critical Paths with Minimum Number of Sensors

Body Stabilization of PDW toward Humanoid Walking

Natsushima Cruise Report NT Sea trial of Autonomous Underwater Vehicle. Yumeiruka around Omuro-dashi. Sagami Bay, Suruga Bay and Omuro-dashi

PROPOSAL OF FLUID SELF-EXCITED OSCILLATION PECULIAR TO A FLAT RING TUBE AND ITS APPLICATION

Activity Title: Exploring the Ocean with Robots

Specifications for Synchronized Sensor Pipe Condition Assessment (AS PROVIDED BY REDZONE ROBOTICS)

6000SLX SL-N HYDRAULIC CRAWLER CRANE

The Performance of Vertical Tunnel Thrusters on an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Operating Near the Free Surface in Waves

DEVELOPMENT OF A SMALL CRUISING-TYPE AUV MANTA-CERESIA AND GUIDANCE SYSTEM CONSTRUCTED WITH NEURAL NETWORK

ACCESS the BLUE ECONOMY ALL OCEANS Engineering Ltd

Kungl Tekniska Högskolan

Centre for Autonomous Systems

The Wave Glider: A Mobile Buoy Concept for Ocean Science. 009 Liquid Robotics Inc.

Autonomous Spilled Oil and Gas Tracking Buoy System and Application to Marine Disaster Prevention System

WATER HYDRAULIC HIGH SPEED SOLENOID VALVE AND ITS APPLICATION

KAIREI Cruise Report. KR17-11 Leg2

Development of the installation process for the tidal power plant Deep Green at Minesto AB A concept development CHRISTIAN ANDERSSON ADAM JOHANNESSON

General Competition Rules (Rules based on the SeaPerch National Challenge rules)

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 1, No 4, 2010

A Discrete, Multiphase Flow Approach to Monopropellant-Based Micropropulsion

Free Swimming of the Swimming Humanoid Robot for the Crawl Stroke

The MEDUSA Deep Sea and FUSION AUVs:

(a) Calculate the speed of the sphere as it passes through the lowest point of its path.

Challenges in Ship Design to Maintain Thrusters inside Ship

Dynamic analysis and motion measurement of ski turns using inertial and force sensors

AN UNDERWATER AUGMENTED REALITY SYSTEM FOR COMMERCIAL DIVING OPERATIONS

Locomotion Concepts. Autonomous Mobile Robots. Concepts Legged Locomotion Wheeled Locomotion. Autonomous Systems Lab. Zürich. Localization.

Isis Deployment. TMS and Live Boating. Inmartech08. Dave Turner Operations Co-ordinator.

Speed Control System Design in Bicycle Robot by Low Power Method. Abstract

Trim and Stabilisation systems NEXT GENERATION IN BOAT CONTROL.

2 Buoyant Force. TAKE A LOOK 2. Identify What produces buoyant force?

INTRODUCING THE PILLAR BOAT! U.S. Patent No. 9,623,935 ABSTRACT

6000SLX HYDRAULIC CRAWLER CRANE

Dynamic Positioning: Method for Disaster Prevention and Risk Management

Focus on Operational Efficiency and Crew Safety - Introducing Advanced ROV Technology in Marine Towed Streamer Seismic

Yokosuka Cruise Report YK11-02

Wave Glider: Liege Colloquium. Colloquium April 27

RR10106 Cruise Plan ITOP Mooring Recovery and PhilSea10 Seaglider Operation (R/V Revelle November 6-26, 2010)

1. A tendency to roll or heel when turning (a known and typically constant disturbance) 2. Motion induced by surface waves of certain frequencies.

INCLINOMETER DEVICE FOR SHIP STABILITY EVALUATION

Development and analysis of a novel add-on drive mechanism for motorizing a manual wheelchair and its step climbing strategy

Transfer of Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Technology, NIO, Goa

Figure 1: Level Pitch Positive Pitch Angle Negative Pitch Angle. Trim: The rotation of a vehicle from side to side. See Figure 2.

Learn more at

APPLICATION OF SOUND PROPAGATION (IN THE PERSIAN GULF AND OMAN SEA)

Digiquartz Water-Balanced Pressure Sensors for AUV, ROV, and other Moving Underwater Applications

JAMSTEC trial of 11,000m UROV

Seaeye Falcon powerful portable versatile

Testing of hull drag for a sailboat

PERCEPTIVE ROBOT MOVING IN 3D WORLD. D.E- Okhotsimsky, A.K. Platonov USSR

Fuzzy Logic System to Control a Spherical Underwater Robot Vehicle (URV)

Design and Development of an Autonomous Surface Watercraft

Spider Robot for Motion with Quasistatic. Force Constraints

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SCHILLING UHD III WORK CLASS ROV SYSTEM

Review and Classification of The Modern ROV

Engineering Flettner Rotors to Increase Propulsion

IAGC Guidelines for Marine Small Boat Training and Competency Appendix 3 - Backup Coxswain Competency and Enabling Objectives September 2013

Designing Diving Beetle Inspired Underwater Robot(D.BeeBot)

Tifft Water Supply Symposium

1 The range of monitoring and ways of its performing

ZMP Trajectory Generation for Reduced Trunk Motions of Biped Robots

Transcription:

Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Sciences Vol. 40(2), April 2011, pp. 181-190 Development of tether mooring type underwater robots: Anchor diver I and II Ya-Wen Huang 1, Koji Ueda 1, Kazuhiro Itoh 2, Yuki Sasaki 1, Paulo Debenest 3, Edwardo F. Fukushima 1 & Shigeo Hirose 1 1 Dept. Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology Ookayama Meguro, Tokyo, 152-8552, Japan [E-mail: huang@robotics.mes.titech.ac.jp; ueda@robotics.mes.titech.ac.jp;] ysasaki@robotics.mes.titech.ac.jp;fukushima@mes.titech.ac.jp; hirose@robotics.mes.titech.ac.jp 2 Hitachi Construction Machinery Co., Ltd., 650, Kandatsu-machi, Tsuchiura-shi, Ibaraki-ken 300-0013 Japan [E-mail: k.itou.xb@hitachi-kenki.com] 3 Hibot Corp, Meguro Hanatani Bldg.801, 2-18-3 Shimo-Meguro, Meguro, Tokyo 153-0064, Japan [E-mail: debenest@hibot.co.jp] Received 23 March 2011, revised 28 April 2011 Ocean survey is more difficult than land-based investigation, since the underwater vehicles are susceptible to being swept away by sea currents. Present study proposes a new concept of underwater vehicle, in which the robot is moored by a tether and utilizes the sea current for movement. Two tether mooring type of underwater vehicles, named Anchor Diver I and Anchor Diver II, will be introduced in this paper. Anchor Diver I is an AUV (Autonomous Underwater Vehicles) developed for long-term ocean survey and Anchor Diver II is a ROV (Remotely Operated Vehicles) which moves with a principle similar to flying a kite in the sky. [Keywords: ocean survey, robotics, radio waves, mooring] Introduction Nowadays, the technology of localization and mapping systems has improved a lot. However, when it comes to underwater fields, it becomes more difficult to do the same thing compared to on land. The reasons are described as follows. Firstly, the map of seabed is not completed yet so it is difficult to know the position by observing the environment [1]. Secondly, radio waves do not work in the water. Therefore the GPS will not work without letting the antenna go higher than the sea surface [2]. Thirdly, the underwater vehicles are usually drifting in the water without a fixed position. Compared to the vehicles on land, underwater vehicles tend to drift constantly with the sea current and they have to consume a lot of power to maintain their position stably. In this paper we focus on the third problem and propose a novel tether mooring method to improve the mobility and stability of underwater robot. By utilizing this tether mooring mechanism, Anchor Diver I and Anchor Diver II (see Figures 1 and 2) are developed for different applications. In the following sections the details of the tether mooring method and the two robots will be explained. Materials and Methods Tether Mooring Type Underwater Robots One significant feature of conventional AUVs is that the vehicles are wireless and have a wide range but are limited by the capacity of the battery. On the contrary, ROVs move with a tether for receiving control signals and receiving energy from the mother ship, but the range of movement is limited by the length of the tether. The concept of the tether mooring type underwater robot is to moor the body to the seabed (for AUVs) or mother ship (for ROVs) by a tether which is kept tight all the time and to move in the water by changing the length of the tether using a reel mechanism, as shown in Figures 3 and 4. The benefits of this kind of mechanism are described as follows: 1 The tether, which is attached to the winch, is kept tight at all times during the operation, allowing

182 INDIAN J. MAR. SCI., VOL. 40, NO. 2, APRIL 2011 Fig. 1 Tether Mooring Type AUV Anchor Diver I Fig. 3 Concept of Tether Mooring Type AUV Fig. 2 Tether Mooring Type ROV Anchor Diver II the robot to maintain a stable position against the sea current with no energy consumption. This kind of characteristic can be effective for both AUVs and ROVs. 2 By using the sea current with the tether mooring type underwater robot, it can generate electricity using a current generator. This feature is especially valuable for AUVs which need to stay in the sea for long-term independent observation. 3 Instead of moving against the sea current, the tether mooring type underwater robots utilize the sea current to search from upstream to downstream. Since this kind of method consumes less energy and moves stably, it is useful for both AUVs and ROVs. Fig. 4 Concept of Tether Mooring Type ROV 4 Since the tether is kept tight at all times, there is a lower possibility of the tether becoming tangled with obstacles on the floor. This feature is useful for ROVs. 5 Since the tether is kept tight at all times, the position can be recorded by measuring the length and direction of the tether. This is useful for both ROVs and AUVs. In order to be able to keep the tether tensioned all the time during the operation without breaking, the strength of the tether is very important. This problem can be solved by using the High Molecular Weight Polyethylene tether which is broadly used for fishing and can stand high tensile force.

HUANG et al.: DEVELOPMENT OF TETHER MOORING TYPE UNDERWATER ROBOTS 183 Categories of Tether Mooring Type AUVs Tether mooring type AUVs can be broadly divided by the number of tethers for mooring: those which are single tether type and multiple tether type. Single tether type underwater robots (shown in Fig. 3) are moored by a single tether which is controlled by changing the length of the tether and adjusting the angle of the rudders. On the other hand, an example of the multiple tether type is the 3 tether type robot shown in Fig. 5, the balance of the buoyancy and the tension on the multiple tethers maintains the robot s stability. The multiple tether type robot controls its position by changing the length of each tether, making 3D movement possible. Furthermore, according to the type of mooring anchor, tether mooring type underwater robots can be divided into three types: fixed anchor, movable anchor, and robot anchor (Fig. 6). For fixed anchor, after the anchor is deployed, and the position of the underwater robot is fixed throughout the mission. On the contrary, the adjustable prongs of a movable anchor allow it to be pulled back and relocated, which expands the range of activities of the underwater robot (Fig. 7). However, when movable anchors are combined with multiple tethers, due to the tether tension applied to the underwater robot, it is difficult to relocate the anchors. As for the robot anchor, the anchor lacks a swimming function but has the ability to move along Fig. 5 3 Tether Type Underwater Robot Fig. 7 Use of movable anchor Fig. 6 Classification of Tether Mooring Type Robot

184 INDIAN J. MAR. SCI., VOL. 40, NO. 2, APRIL 2011 the sea floor. The robot anchor receives the power supply from the underwater main body through the tether. In this case, it is also possible to transfer some of the functions of the main body to the robot anchor side. By combining the robot anchor type with the multiple tether type, the robot can function as colony robot. Results and Discussion Development of Anchor Diver I For the purpose of detecting CO 2 leaks during ocean CO 2 sequestration [3], there is a need for independent underwater robots that can make observations while maintaining their position over the seabed against the current for long periods of time. In order to achieve this objective, Anchor Diver I [4] was proposed. The robot is moored and its position is controlled by changing the length of the tether. In addition, it can sustain itself with a sea current power generation system. Anchor Diver I is developed as a prototype of a tether mooring type underwater robot. Figure 8 shows the concept of Anchor Diver. Anchor Diver is equipped with a screw fan generator. Due to the design of a movable anchor mechanism, the anchor can be pulled back and relocated which expands the range of activities as shown in Fig. 9. Table 1 describes the specification of Anchor Diver. It is easy to carry to the experiment spot with total height within 400 mm and weight within 10 kg. Fig. 10 shows the image of the turning motion of Anchor Diver I. Since the robot has to stay on the seabed for a long time, it is necessary to attach an auto-cleaner which Fig. 8 Concept of Anchor Diver can move along the tether to clean the algae attached on the tether to make the reel mechanism operate smoothly. Development of Anchor Diver II Most of the present ROVs equip more than one thruster and operate by subtle thrust modulation to enable steering and to maintain its position in the environment against current. However, the multiple thruster arrangement means these ROVs often have difficulty in maintaining their position against the current. In addition, position identification sensors using an on-board ultrasonic transmitter are commonly used. However, according to divers experiences, it is clear that they often cannot be used in real situations due to secondary reflections of ultrasonic waves. Additionally, the tether is generally required to have some slack to enable free movement and this length can often cause accidents by tangling with obstacles on the floor or buoys on the surface. Anchor Diver II is a tethered underwater robot with kite-style steering developed to solve this kind of problem. The concepts of Anchor Diver II are as follows. Overview of the System As Figure 11 shows, the mother-ship which measures its own position by GPS has an on-board winch W, with connected tether. The wire needs to be under tension while the robot is operating. As Figure 12 shows, Anchor Diver II is equipped with an actuated 2-DOF arm and one thruster, and measures its position and orientation relative to the point P, where the arm is attached to the tether. When the mother ship is moored and stationary, or when there is no sea current, the thruster will be actuated to make Anchor Diver II move away from the winch to keep the tether under tension. The 2-DOF arm is actuated to change the orientation of the robot and hence change the direction of thrust. A surveillance camera and short-range sonar is attached to the bottom of the body of the robot. The Table 1 Mechatronics characteristics Measure (Length Width Height) Displacement Wight in the air Diameter of screw fan Horizontal rudder angle range Vertical rudder angle range 830mm 484mm 392mm 10.6kg 10.3kg 196mm ±90deg ±45deg

HUANG et al.: DEVELOPMENT OF TETHER MOORING TYPE UNDERWATER ROBOTS 185 camera is utilized when the underwater environment is clear and sonar is utilized when the water is cloudy due to sediment, etc. The observation data obtained will be sent to the mother-ship by the tether and it will be possible to calculate the real-time terrestrial position coordinates using the GPS data and the length and direction of the tether. The hull structure shown in Figure 12 has a flat panel shape with top and bottom cylinders for buoyancy and ballast. The center of buoyancy is located at the top of the body. When there is current or the mother ship moves, the wire is kept tight to Fig. 9 Lock-release Mechanism of Movable Anchor ensure that the flat side of the body faces the current which is in the same manner as a kite opposes the wind. The orientation of the robot relative to point P, where the tether is fixed, can be controlled by adjusting the angular positions of two actuators on the arm. Movement of Anchor Diver II The movement of Anchor Diver II can be divided into two modes: thruster mode and kite-style mode. When there is no current, the thruster is actuated to make the tether tight and to move to the search area.

186 INDIAN J. MAR. SCI., VOL. 40, NO. 2, APRIL 2011 The steering control by thruster is shown in Figure 13. When there is current, the robot can move to the search area without power. After the robot reaches the survey area, the robot moves from one side to another, then the winch actuates to gradually roll back the wire. The steering movement of Anchor Diver II shown in Figure 14 uses the same principle as a kite. Main Body Design Anchor Diver II is developed as a prototype of a tether type underwater robot. Figure 15 shows the appearance of Anchor Diver II. Anchor Diver II is Fig. 10 Circuitous Cruising equipped with a 2-DOF robot arm. Due to the power supply coming from the mother-ship, Anchor Diver II can operate for a long time which increases the mobility. The ship has been developed before the development of a reel mechanism. The thruster can generate continual bollard thrust of 2.2 kgf. Figure 16 shows the mechanism of the joint of the robot arm. Each joint is driven by a 60 W DC motor and the rotation speed is reduced by spur gears and a flat-hollow type harmonic drive in which all the wires can go through the center hole. The torque of each joint is 21.36 Nm. Each joint of the axis of gyration is

HUANG et al.: DEVELOPMENT OF TETHER MOORING TYPE UNDERWATER ROBOTS 187 water-proofed by oil seal. Other parts of the robot are water-proofed by O-rings and adhesion bond. The robot is designed with positive buoyancy. Table 2 describes the specification of Anchor Diver II. Fig. 11 Overview of Anchor Diver II Fig. 12 Components of Anchor Diver II Fig. 13 Steering Control by Thruster Search Method of Anchor Diver II When there is current in the river or sea, Anchor Diver II is moored to the mother ship which is anchored and still. As Figure 17 shows Anchor Diver II should be placed on the downstream side and then search from side to side by changing only the angle of the arm without applying electrical power. Adjusting the length of the cable can enlarge the searching area. When there is no current, the mother ship should drag the robot and move to generate relative speed as shown in Figure 18. Then the robot can search the area by changing the angle of the robot arm. Operation Check of Anchor Diver II In order to simulate the situation while the robot is under hydraulic pressure, the water-resistance test was to put a certain amount of dry ice into the body then place the robot into the pool. Here we simulated the depth of water of 5m and 10m. During the test no bubbles leaked out. Therefore water-resistance was confirmed. The ability to recover from non-upright positions was confirmed by putting the robot upside-down in the water and it moved back to the original state. Kite-style mode and thruster mode can be implemented by operating the 2-DOF arm and the thruster. Figure 19 shows the image of the thruster mode and kite-style mode. The experiment was held in Hawaii Undersea Research Laboratory. Figure 20 shows the force acting on the end of the arm when the mother ship is under sea Fig. 14 Kite-style Steering Control

188 INDIAN J. MAR. SCI., VOL. 40, NO. 2, APRIL 2011 Fig. 15 Appearance of Anchor Diver Fig. 16 Section of the Joint 1 of the Robot Arm Table 2 Mechatronics characteristics Measure (Length Width Height) 1036mm 781mm 155mm Displacement 31.5kg Wight in the air 31kg Performance of the thruster 2.2kgf 1 st joint angle range ±540deg 2 nd joint angle range ±540deg Forward Speed 0.21m/s Backward Speed 0.16m/s Fig. 17 Search Method with Current current. From the result of the test it showed that the force acting on the robot is not completely steady. The reasons can be considered as follow: 1 Direction of the sea current was not stable. 2 While the mother ship was anchored, it was still floating and changing the orientation by current. More experiments need to be carried out in order to find the optimal angle of the robot arm to move efficiently in different speeds of sea current.

HUANG et al.: DEVELOPMENT OF TETHER MOORING TYPE UNDERWATER ROBOTS 189 Fig. 18 Search Method without Current Fig. 19 Left: Thruster Mode Right: Kite Mode

190 INDIAN J. MAR. SCI., VOL. 40, NO. 2, APRIL 2011 Fig. 20 Force Acting on the End of the Arm Conclusions The concept of tether type underwater robot Anchor Diver I and Anchor Diver II were proposed, and the first two models have been built. The mobility of Anchor Diver I and II were evaluated. The next step will be the development of the reel mechanism. Additionally, it is necessary to attach a high resolution sonar for underwater search in cloudy water. Acknowledgement The authors would like to thank Prof. Reza Ghorbani and the Hawaii Undersea Research Laboratory for lending their facility and helping with the experiments. References 1 Toshihiro Maki, Hayato Kondo, and Tamaki Ura, Underwater Visual Mapping by an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle, Journal of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers, Volume 47 October 2008 Number 10, P.810-816 2 Tamaki Ura, System Integration for Ocean Engineering, Journal of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers, Volume 47 October 2008 Number 10, P.787-790 3 Kenkichi Tamura, CO 2 Storage on Deep Seabed, Journal of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers, Volume 47 October 2008 Number 10, P.803-809 4 Ya-Wen Huang, Koji Ueda, Kazuhiro Itoh, Edwardo F. Fukushima, Shigeo Hirose, Development of Tether Mooring Type Underwater Robot, The 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, P.267-272