HUNTER EFFORT SURVEY 2015

Similar documents
Executive Summary. TUCSON TRANSIT ON BOARD ORIGIN AND DESTINATION SURVEY Conducted October City of Tucson Department of Transportation

Conseil de développement économique des Territoires du Nord-Ouest Quebec Travel conversion study 2008 Report May 26, 2009

AN ASSESSMENT OF NEW JERSEY DEER HUNTER OPINION ON EXPANDING ANTLER POINT RESTRICTION (APR) REGULATIONS IN DEER MANAGEMENT ZONES 28, 30, 31, 34 AND 47

2018 Season Waterfowl Hunter Survey Summary. Presented by Josh Richardson, Sr. Biologist Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation

2012 Emiquon Duck Hunting

Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

Wildlife Ad Awareness & Attitudes Survey 2015

2017 North Texas Regional Bicycle Opinion Survey

DKS & WASHINGTON COUNTY Washington County Transportation Survey

CRACIUN RESEARCH. June 20, 2011 A M A R K E T R E S E A R C H S T CHA

U.S. Bicycling Participation Study

Appendix A (Survey Results) Scroll Down

Dial A Lift Customer Survey 2011 Executive Summary

Rider Satisfaction Survey Total Market 2006

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

September 2002 Tracking Survey Topline September 9 October 6, 2002

2014 Ontario Works Transit Survey: Final Results

1. Deer hunting structure around your property Please tick the appropriate box in each block.

2014 Bike to Work Day: Survey Report Denver Regional Council of Governments

TRAPPING HARVEST STATISTICS. Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN (651)

Cobb Community Transit

AAMPO Regional Transportation Attitude Survey

WILMAPCO Public Opinion Survey Summary of Results

2016 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report

Alaska Recreation Survey 2013

TRAPPING HARVEST STATISTICS. Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN (651)

2016 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report

Rider Satisfaction Survey Phoenix Riders 2004

WYDOT Customer Satisfaction Survey 2016

Peace Region Wildlife Regulations Proposed Changes for Comment ( )

Summary of Research RESULTS SAFETY TRAINING. Selected Results From a 2006 Survey of Registered Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) Owners in Montana YES 44%

Capital Bikeshare 2011 Member Survey Executive Summary

Topics covered. File location/file Name (including version)/author Initials/Support Initials/Date

APPENDIX B: DATA TABLES

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

TRAPPING HARVEST STATISTICS. Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN (651)

TRAPPING HARVEST STATISTICS. Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN (651)

2011 Countywide Attitudinal and Awareness Survey Results

Baseline Survey of New Zealanders' Attitudes and Behaviours towards Cycling in Urban Settings

Oregon State Lottery Behavior & Attitude Tracking Study

Community & Transportation Preferences Survey

HUNTERS OPINIONS ON SHOOTING DEER OVER SUPPLEMENTAL FEED OR CORN

APPENDIX 3: EAGLECREST MASTER PLAN PUBLIC OPINION SURVEYS

FLETCHER AVENUE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLIST BEHAVIOR CHANGE FORMATIVE RESEARCH PROJECT

Customer Satisfaction Tracking Report 2016 Quarter 1

Deer and Deer Management in Central New York: Local Residents Interests and Concerns

2012 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report

WATERFOWL HUNTING IN MINNESOTA. A study of people who hunted for waterfowl in Minnesota from 2000 through Final Report

Public Input to St. Lawrence River Fisheries Community Objectives

Dear Volunteer: Sincerely, Anne Coles. President, Alberta Trappers Association. RFMA Log Book- Trapping Season 2017/18 Page 1

AN ASSESSMENT OF NEW JERSEY RESIDENT HUNTER OPINION ON CROSSBOW USE

APPENDIX 1 INTRODUCTORY LETTER, SURVEY COVER LETTERS, REMINDER POSTCARD, AND QUESTION & ANSWER SHEET

USA Triathlon Membership Survey Report Colorado Springs, Colorado

OVERVIEW OF METHODOLOGY

Transportation Issues Poll for New York City

Daily Internet Tracking Survey Topline March 1-31 and May 2-19, 2002

BCLC Employee Survey Final Report. August 31, 2016

Route User Intercept Survey Report

National Association of REALTORS National Smart Growth Frequencies

MANAGING GEESE WITH RECREATIONAL HUNTING

PUBLIC OPINION SURVEY OF BOWLING GREEN, KENTUCKY REGARDING CITY SERVICES

Gonzales Research & Marketing Strategies

Bay Area Council 2016 Report of Survey Results Regarding Transportation

Irish Water Safety Consumer Research Survey. March 2017

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

RUTGERS FOOTBALL MAJORITY SAY IT CAN IMPROVE STATE IMAGE WANT BIG TIME FOOTBALL

RANDOMIZE Q.1 AND Q.2/Q.2a ASK ALL: Q.1 All in all, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the way things are going in this country today?

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES SURVEY: Prepared by: Heather E. Milligan

A SURVEY OF 1997 COLORADO ANGLERS AND THEIR WILLINGNESS TO PAY INCREASED LICENSE FEES

UWA Commuting Survey 2013

March Final Report

Table of Contents

Gambling Involvement and Problem Gambling in Manitoba. April 2002

Boat Owners Survey April 2016

GALLUP NEWS SERVICE GALLUP POLL SOCIAL SERIES: WORLD AFFAIRS

Community & Transportation Preferences Survey U.S. Metro Areas, 2015 July 23, 2015

NFL1. Do you think television shows, in general, are getting better or getting worse?

Downtown Tampa Parking User Survey

Accessibility, mobility and social exclusion

Plurality Approve of Fed Response to Saudi Arabia

Summer Flounder. Wednesday, April 26, Powered by

GALLUP NEWS SERVICE GALLUP POLL SOCIAL SERIES: WORLD AFFAIRS

RECRUITMENT HUNTERS A case-study approach to learning more about hunting among Hispanics and improving recruitment and retention of other hunters

GALLUP NEWS SERVICE GALLUP POLL SOCIAL SERIES: WORK AND EDUCATION

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN OUTREACH: INTERACTIVE MAP SUMMARY REPORT- 10/03/14

MALL CROSSING STUDY. Testing the Effectiveness Of the 4th Street East Crossing. For: City of Charlottesville Neighborhood Development Services

The Impact of TennCare: A Survey of Recipients 2009

SAMPLE REPORT SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

JUNEAU SECOND CHANNEL CROSSING WATERWAY USER SURVEY RESULTS

Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council

ROLLER DERBY DEMOGRAPHICS:

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Predator and Furbearer Management. SPECIES: Predatory and Furbearing Mammals

2005 Arkansas Nongame Wildlife Conservation Survey

Liverpool Lime Street station engineering work. Knowledge and support for October 2017 improvement work November 2017

LAKE ONTARIO FISHING AND FISH CONSUMPTION

Almost Half Say Smartphone Makers Not Doing Enough To Fight Addiction

SAMPLE REPORT. Supplement to the Consumer Segmentation Analysis on the Commercial Firearms & Accessories Market

SWELOGS a longitudinal study on Gambling and Health

Transcription:

HUNTER EFFORT SURVEY 2015 BISON Findings and summary report of the 2015 Hunter Effort Survey for bison seal holders. Prepared by Lisa Kanary and Shylo Sawatzky, Yukon Bureau of Statistics. For more information, contact ybsinfo@gov.yk.ca

CONTENTS Executive Summary... 2 Methodology... 2 Part 1: Hunter Habits... 4 Part 2: Hunting Practices... 6 Part 3: Most Recent Yukon Hunting Trips... 9 Part 4: Hunter Satisfaction... 13 Part 5: Hunter Demographics... 14 Appendix: Questionnaire Summary Data... 15 1 / 26

2015 HUNTER EFFORT SURVEY BISON SEAL HOLDERS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 2015 Hunter Effort Survey for bison gathered information from bison seal holders 1 following the close of the 2015 bison hunting season. The survey collected details on hunters efforts, such as motivations for bison hunting, modes of transportation used, size of hunting party, length of trips, and location of hunting areas. Information about hunters habits, methods, recent hunting trips, overall hunting satisfaction and demographic information is collected to inform decisions about bison management and hunting opportunities. The majority (95%) of survey respondents hunted during the 2014-2015 season. Ninety-four percent of hunters hunted big game species and 89% hunted bison in the last 5 years. Twenty-two percent of survey respondents reported harvesting at least 232 female bison of which at least 110 were pregnant. Most respondents (86%) chose to use a snowmobile or an ATV to hunt bison and placed most importance on accessibility (16%) when choosing an area to hunt. Food supply was the most important (92%) purpose to hunt bison, while a very few hunted for trophies. It was well known (95%) among hunters that they were encouraged to harvest a female bison. Thirty-six percent and 7%of respondents preferred to harvest a cow or bull, respectively. Twenty percent of hunters harvested bison in the 2014-15 season. Responding hunters experienced an increase (33%) or decrease (24%) in effort depending upon the availability of time. Overall, 59% of the respondents took one- or two-day trips to hunt bison in the 2014-15 season and most of these trips were in March (29%). Ninety-three percent of respondents had planned their three most recent hunting trips, which generally lasted 1 to 2 days (61%) and mostly taken in the month of March (34%). The most frequently visited game management zone was 546 (11%). However, over the three most recent trips, 542 (16 bison) and 540 (15 bison) were the zones most likely to harvest bison. Hunting parties generally (83%) shared any harvest. Over-all, hunters were somewhat or very satisfied about their hunting experience (almost 70%), Environment Yukon paper and web-based hunting rule clarity (just over 80%) and Environment Yukon staff services (90%). Among the respondents, 91% were male (91%), 84% were at least 30 years old, 77% had at least 10 years of hunting experience, and 78% were from Whitehorse. METHODOLOGY The questionnaire was developed by the Department of Environment. The Yukon Bureau of Statistics assisted in the questionnaire development process, and then designed and administered the survey, analyzed the data, and prepared this report. 1 A bison seal is a small paper tag used to record bison kill details including date, hunting zone, and sex. 2 / 26

A sample of 1,078 respondents was derived from a list of bison seal holders provided by Yukon Environment. The survey was conducted by mail-in questionnaire with follow-up telephone interviews for those respondents who did not return the questionnaire in the mail. Data cleaning was conducted to ready the dataset for analysis and consisted of correcting invalid data entries, ensuring consistent numerical formatting, and properly coding any open-ended responses to appropriate categories. Non-responses were not included in the question-by-question analysis. A total of 893 (83%) surveys were completed (Table 1a). Table 1.a Survey Questionnaire Results Description Frequency Data entry only (paper form completed) 431 Fax machine 2 No one home/no answer 14 Regular busy signal 2 Completed Survey 462 Incorrect phone number 12 Information unavailable for duration of survey 18 Language barrier 3 Call back required 54 No contact with selected respondent 37 Appointment 3 Duplicate form/number 1 Household member hangs up 3 New phone number 3 Out of scope 2 Refusal (Hard) 14 Refusal (Soft) 15 Unusual/special circumstances 2 Total Sample 1,078 The refusal rate for the Hunter Effort survey was 2.7%. Reasons given for out of scope, special circumstances and refusals are detailed in Table 1b. Table 1.b Out of Scope, Special Circumstances and Refusals Out of Scope 2 responses Special Circumstances 2 responses Refusal 19 responses It s not mandatory 5 Not Interested / Willing to Participate 5 Didn t hunt bison so no need to do the survey 2 Error 2 Too busy / No time 2 Mailed it in 1 Notes for survey refusal 1 Passed away 1 3 / 26

PART 1: HUNTER HABITS Ninety-four percent of respondents hunted big game species in the last 5 years with a majority (65%) hunting each of the 5 years. Eighty-nine percent of respondents hunted bison in the last 5 years with a majority (70%) hunting up to 4 out of the last 5 years (Figure 1). 500 450 400 350 300 Figure 1. Number of Respondents by Years of Hunting in the Last 5 Years big game bison 496 250 216 200 150 100 50 51 91 73 78 156 109 123 80 83 161 0 0 of 5 years 1 of 5 years 2 of 5 years 3 of 5 years 4 of 5 years 5 of 5 years The majority of hunters (78%) did not harvest a female bison (Figure 2). 600 571 Figure 2. Female and Pregnant Bison Harvested 500 400 300 female pregnant 200 100 0 118 82 60 30 13 10 4 6 3 none 1 2 3 4 or more Respondents were asked whether they felt harvesting a bison in the last 5 years had reduced their other big game species hunting effort in the following year. Amongst the respondents who hunted bison in the past 5 years, 41% felt that bison hunting did not reduce their hunting effort for other big game species, 37% felt it reduced their hunting effort for other big game species, while 22% responded neutrally (Figure 3). 4 / 26

Figure 3. Harvesting a bison in the past 5 years reduced big game species hunting effort? (n=671) Strongly agree Somewhat agree 18% 19% Neither agree/disagree 22% Somewhat disagree 10% Strongly disagree 31% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% When asked what species they hunted during the 2015 season, the most popular response was bison and other species (59%), followed by other species only (21%) and bison only (15%). Twenty-six percent of the respondents said they did not go on a bison hunting trip in the 2014-15 season. The remaining 5% of respondents stated that they did not hunt in 2015 (Figure 4). Figure 4. Hunting Effort 2014-15 Season 450 400 350 300 250 59% 70% 60% 50% 40% 200 150 100 15% 21% 30% 20% 50 5% 10% 0 Bison only Bison and other species Other species only Did not hunt for any big game 0% 5 / 26

PART 2: HUNTING PRACTICES When hunting for bison, almost 27% of the 651 respondents generally hunted in the same area each year; 47% mostly hunted in the same area, but occasionally hunted somewhere different; and almost 27% hunted in a different area each year. The three most frequently used modes of transportation in bison hunting trips were snowmobiles (74%), ATV or Argo (12%), and on-road vehicle (4%) (Figure 5). While 7% of the respondents hunted on foot, some of them possibly used a form of transportation to reach the hunting area. Figure 5. Bison Hunting Modes of Transportation (n=681) Horse Aircraft On skis/snowshoes Vehicle - 4 x 4 Vehicle - on road On foot 0.0% 0.1% 1.3% 2.2% 3.8% 6.6% ATV or Argo 11.7% Snowmobile 74.2% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% The responding hunters identified a range of factors they considered important when selecting an area to hunt bison. These included accessibility (16%), few other harvesters in the area and prior experience with the area (14% each), ease of finding a bison (12%), information from other hunters (11%), Environment Yukon maps of bison concentration (9%), type of travel and remoteness (8% each), and landscape and scenery (6%) (Figure 6). Figure 6. Hunting Area Criteria Importance (n=2413) 0% 5% 10% 15% Other 2% Environment Yukon bison area of concentration maps (web) 9% Information from other bison hunters 11% Prior experience with that area 14% Landscape scenery 6% Ease of finding a bison 12% Remoteness 8% Few other harvesters in the area 14% Type of travel 8% Accessibility 6 / 26

Increased Effort (n=381) Decreased Effort (n=187) Of the 726 hunters who responded to the question on the purpose of hunting bison, 92% said that the main reason was for food, less than 2% said the reason was for trophy, and 6% had other reasons for hunting bison. Of the 683 respondents, 95% were aware that Environment Yukon encouraged hunters to harvest cow bison, only 7% preferred to hunt for bull bison and 20% of the responding hunters harvested a bison. Compared to the last time respondents held a bison seal, hunting efforts in 2015 stayed the same for 43%, decreased for 24%, and increased for 33% of the 509 respondents. The main reasons given for the increase were that hunters had more available time (19%), availability of hunting partners (13%), not enough bison (12%). The main reasons given for the decrease in efforts included lack of time (32%), other reasons (19%), poor weather conditions (11%), and partner availability and difficulty finding bison (10% each) (Figure 7). Regulations Too costly Lack of equipment Health / injury Less need for meat Available hunting partner(s) Difficulty finding bison Poorer weather conditions Other Lack of time Regulations More disposable income Better weather conditions Better equipped Greater need for meat Wanted to get outdoors Other Not enough bison Available hunting partner(s) More available time Figure 7. Reasons for Bison Effort Increase/Decrease 1.6% 2.7% 3.2% 4.8% 6.4% 9.6% 10.2% 10.7% 2.1% 0.0% 2.6% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 8.9% 9.2% 10.0% 10.5% 12.3% 12.3% 13.4% 19.3% 18.6% 31.6% When asked about hunting trip frequency during the 2014-2015 hunting season, 84% said they went on only one trip, 11% went on two trips, and 5% said they went on 3 or more trips (Figure 8). 7 / 26

300 281 Figure 8. Bison Hunting Trip Frequency and Length in Days 250 236 200 150 149 135 100 50 0 58 59 65 29 32 34 18 7 13 2 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 Trip 1 (n=947) Trip 2 (n=124) Trip 3+ (n=53) 1 day 2 days 3 days 4 days 5 days 6 days 7+ days The most popular month to hunt was March (29%), followed by February (17%) and November (16%) (Figure 9). 350 Figure 9. Monthly Trip Frequency (n=1124) 29% 35% 300 30% 250 25% 200 16% 14% 17% 20% 150 15% 100 7% 8% 8% 10% 50 5% 0 September October November December January February March 0% 8 / 26

PART 3: MOST RECENT YUKON HUNTING TRIPS Respondents were asked to provide information on their first, second, and third most recent bison hunting trips in Yukon. The following information was requested for each trip: Whether the trip was planned; The number of hunters and hunters with seals in the party; The number of bison harvested during the trip by the party; The start date of the hunting trip; The number of days they hunted, and the total length of the trip, in days; The modes of transportation used; The Game Management Subzones (GMS) in which the hunt took place; Whether a bison was harvested on the trip, and if so, in what GMS and if the animal was shared amongst the hunting party; Whether the harvest was shared amongst the party; The sex and intended sex of the harvested bison; and The number of other hunting parties encountered. Nearly 93% of all trips were planned and 24% of all trips resulted in a harvest. Over all of the trips, the most common number of hunters (50%) and hunters with a seal (51%) in a hunting party was two. The second most common number was three (Figure 10). 500 Figure 10. Number of Hunters and Hunters w/seals in a Hunting Party 486 490 450 400 350 300 250 200 189 237 194 Hunters (n=964) Hunters w/seal (n=961) 150 144 100 78 79 50 0 1 hunter 2 hunters 3 hunters 4-6 hunters 7+ hunters 19 9 Overall, the start date for trips occurred most often in March (34%). The second most popular month for starting a trip was February (17%), followed by November (15%) (Figure 11). 9 / 26

50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 47% 24% 19% 15% 14% 13% 11% 7% 8% Figure 11. Start Month of Hunting Trips Trip 1 (n=537) Trip 2 (n=273) Trip 3 (n=138) 21% 20% 21% 16% 13% 11% 9% 5% 6% 6% 6% 7% January February March September October November December Two-day hunting trips occurred most often (39%) where the number of days hunted was equal to the length of the trip (Figure 12). 60% Figure 12. Number of Hunting and Trip Days 53% 50% 40% 35% 40% Trip 1 (n=534) Trip 2 (n=273) Trip 3 (n=141) 30% 20% 10% 0% 26% 21% 19% 17% 15% 12% 12% 9% 10% 9% 6% 6% 4% 3% 2% 0% 0% 0% 1 day 2 days 3 days 4 days 5 days 6-10 days 7+ days Most hunters used a variety of modes of transportation on hunting trips. Overall, respondents were most likely to travel by snowmobile (40%), followed by on-road vehicle and on foot (17% each) (Figure 11). 10 / 26

Zone 414 Zone 504 Zone 511 Zone 520 Zone 524 Zone 525 Zone 526 Zone 530 Zone 531 Zone 532 Zone 533 Zone 534 Zone 535 Zone 536 Zone 537 Zone 538 Zone 539 Zone 540 Zone 541 Zone 542 Zone 543 Zone 544 Zone 545 Zone 546 Zone 547 Zone 548 Zone 549 Zone 550 Zone 610 Zone 611 Zone 701 Zone 702 Zone 703 Zone 704 Zone 705 Zone 715 Zone 716 Zone 802 Figure 11. Transportation Used for Hunting Trips 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% ATV or Argo 11% 10% 21% 19% Vehicle - on road 21% 0% 8% Vehicle - 4x4 off-road 9% 14% Snowmobile 39% 42% 16% 34% On foot 18% 21% Horseback 0% 1% 0% Trip 1 (n=884) 3% Skis / snowshoes 2% Trip 2 (n=445) 9% 0% Trip 3 (n=234) Other 0% 2% Responding hunters were also asked which game management zones (Zone) they hunted in during their 3 most recent hunting trips. Respondents were allowed to list up to five different zones for a single trip (Figure 12). Overall, Zones 546, 544 and 547 were most frequented by the respondents for their three most recent hunting trips. 160 Figure 12. Game Management Zones for Hunting Trips (n=1360) 140 120 100 80 60 Trip 3 (n=217) Trip 2 (n=389) Trip 1 (n=754) 40 20 0 Responding hunters were also asked which zones they had harvested a bison in (Figure 13). The highest number of bison harvested (16) was in Zone 542, followed by 15 bison in Zone 540, and then 13 bison in each of Zones 545 and 547. 11 / 26

Zone 511 Zone 526 Zone 530 Zone 533 Zone 534 Zone 536 Zone 538 Zone 539 Zone 540 Zone 541 Zone 542 Zone 543 Zone 544 Zone 545 Zone 546 Zone 547 Zone 548 Zone 549 Zone 550 Zone 701 Zone 704 Figure 13. Location of Bison Harvest (n=131) 16 14 12 10 8 6 Trip 3 (n=10) Trip 2 (n=9) Trip 1 (n=113) 4 2 0 Overall, 83% of hunters shared their harvest with the hunting party, 70% of hunters harvested the intended sex which was 62% male, and 67% of hunters encountered other hunting parties. 12 / 26

PART 4: HUNTER SATISFACTION When asked about hunters overall hunting satisfaction, the majority of hunters were either very satisfied or somewhat satisfied with the overall bison hunting experience (68%), hunting regulation summary rule clarity (78%), and with services provided by Environment Yukon staff (81%) (Figure 14). About half (49%) of the respondents were either very satisfied or somewhat satisfied with the clarity of presentation of rules and information materials on the Environment Yukon website, while 42% expressed satisfaction with bison area of concentration maps. However, close to 40% of hunters did not have an opinion (didn t know or N/A) about the rules (39%) and the maps (38%) on the Environment Yukon website. Environment Yukon staff bison hunt service satisfaction? Bison hunting regulation summary rules clarity satifaction? Overall, how satisfied were you with your bison hunting experience in 2014-2015? Environment Yukon website bison hunting rules clarity satifaction? Environment Yukon bison area of concentration website maps for hunt planning satifaction? Figure 14. Overall Satisfaction 1% 0% 5% 12% 17% 21% 24% 18% 22% 27% 25% 32% 43% 52% Very satisfied Somewhat satisfied 69% Neither satified nor dissatisfied Somewhat dissatisfied Very dissatisfied 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% N/A Don't know 13 / 26

PART 5: HUNTER DEMOGRAPHICS The survey collected basic demographic information including gender, age, and years of hunting experience from the respondents. Ninety-one percent of the respondents were male. The majority of the respondents (36% each) were in the 31-45 and 46-64 years age groups. Just 16% of the respondents were 30 years of age or younger (Figure 15). 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 801 76 Figure 15. Respondent Demographics 12 129 309 314 Male Female 12-18 yrs 19-30 yrs 31-45 yrs 46-64 yrs 65+ yrs Gender (n=877) Age (n=870) 106 When asked about years of overall big game hunting experience, 57% of the respondents said they had hunted for at least twenty years, 20% had hunted for 10-19 years, while 23% had hunted for less than ten years. Regarding years of hunting in Yukon, nearly half (49%) of the respondents said they had hunted in Yukon for at least fifteen years, 32% had hunted for 5-14 years, while 19% had hunted for less than five years. The majority of the respondents (70%) said they had less than 10 years hunting experience outside of Yukon (Figure 16). 554 Figure 16. Years Hunting Overall, Inside and Outside of the Yukon 500 400 300 238 Overall Hunting (n=867) Hunting Inside Yukon (n=867) Hunting Outside Yukon (n=866) 200 100 0 153152 132 132 121 95 111 93 69 82 81 83 92 73 71 50 54 39 86 9 25 5 <5 yrs 5-9 yrs 10-14 yrs 15-19 yrs 20-29 yrs 30-39 yrs 40-49 yrs 50+ yrs *Note: Bin totals for inside and outside of Yukon may not add up to the total for the corresponding overall hunting bin Seventy-eight percent of the respondents indicated they lived in Whitehorse as of November 15, 2015. 14 / 26

APPENDIX: QUESTIONNAIRE SUMMARY DATA Hunter Effort Survey Bison seal holders, 2014-2015 Season The Department of Environment is asking people who obtained a bison seal in 2014/15 to complete this hunter effort survey. Whether or not you harvested an animal, or even went out hunting, we want to hear from you. The purpose of this survey is to find out more about how you went about your bison hunt and your preferred approach to hunting. The information collected will inform decisions about bison management and hunting opportunities. This survey is not mandatory. We would appreciate it if you would take about 10 minutes to answer the questions and return your form in the envelope provided by June 12, 2015.Whether you hunted for bison in 2014/15 or not, your information is important. The Yukon Bureau of Statistics is conducting this survey on behalf of the Department of Environment and responses will be shared with the department for their internal use. However, information from your responses will be aggregated with others for analysis and reporting purposes, and individual respondents will not be identified in any reports or associated materials. Information collected through this survey is protected in accordance with the Statistics Act and the Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act. If you have questions, please contact the Yukon Bureau of Statistics at 867-667-8029. For your convenience, a copy of the Bison Management Area map is enclosed to help you identify the Game Management Subzones in which you hunted. You can view this map online at www.env.gov.yk.ca/bisonmap. If you have any questions about the contents of this survey call Environment Yukon at 867-667-5177 or 1-800-661-0408 extension 5177. A report summarizing the results of the survey will be posted on the Department of Environment website this fall. Please mail your completed survey using the postage-paid envelope provided by June 12, 2015.

Part 1: Your Hunting Habits BGAME In the last 5 years, how many years have you hunted for any big game species? (Check one) 1 73 (8%) 2 78 (9%) 3 109 (12%) 4 80 (9%) 5 496 (56%) Did not hunt any big game species 51 (6%) (If you did not hunt any big game species, please go to Part 2) BSYRS How many years did you hunt bison in the last 5 years? (Check one) 1 216 (26%) 2 156 (19%) 3 15 (15%) 4 83 (10%) 5 161 (19%) Did not hunt bison 91 (11%) (If you did not hunt bison, please go Part 2) We are interested in understanding more about bison reproduction. In the last 5 years: How many female bison have you harvested? FMBS 0... 571 (78%) 1... 118 (16%) 2... 30 (4%) 3... 10 (1%) 4 or more... 6 (1%) How many of those bison were pregnant? MLBS 0... 82 (51%) 1... 60 (37%) 2... 13 (8%) 3... 4 (2%) 4 or more... 3 (2%) Environment Yukon would like to know if bison hunting has resulted in other big game species being taken less often. To what extent would you agree with the following statement: In the last 5 years, harvesting a bison reduced my hunting effort the following year for other big game species. (Circle one) BREDC Strongly disagree Somewhat disagree Neither agree nor disagree Somewhat agree Strongly agree 1 208 (31.0%) 2 70 (10.4%) 3 149 (22.2%) 4 118 (17.6%) 5 126 (18.8%) Which big game species did you spend time hunting during the 2014-2015 season? SPCSH Bison only... 115 (15%) Bison and other species... 437 (59%) Other species only... 159 (21%) Did not hunt for any big game species... 35 (5%) Part 2: How you hunt for bison Please fill in this part even if you did not go hunting for bison during the 2014-2015 season. If you have NEVER hunted bison, please proceed directly to Part 4. 2.1 When you hunt for bison, do you generally go to: (Check one) AREA 1 The same area each year... 173 (27%) 2 Same area, but will occasionally hunt somewhere different... 305 (47%) 3 Different area each year... 173 (27%)

2.2 When you hunt for bison what type of hunting transport do you primarily use (excluding use of a vehicle used to transport snowmobiles or ATV s prior to start of the hunt)? (Check one only): TRANS 1 Snowmobile... 505 (74.2%) 2 ATV or Argo... 80 (11.7%) 3 On foot... 45 (6.6%) 4 Vehicle - on road... 26 (3.8%) 5 Vehicle - 4 x 4... 15 (2.2%) 6 On skis/snowshoes... 9 (1.3%) 6 Horseback... 8 Other: Aircraft... 1 (0.1%) 2.3 Which of the following are important to you when selecting an area to hunt bison? (Check all that apply): ARSL 1 Accessibility... 388 (16.1%) 2 Type of travel... 204 (8.5%) 3 Few other harvesters in the area... 328 (13.6%) 4 Remoteness... 194 (8.0%) 5 Ease of finding a bison... 294 (12.2%) 6 Landscape scenery... 133 (5.5%) 7 Prior experience with that area... 344 (14.3%) 8 Information from other bison hunters... 272 (11.3%) 9 Environment Yukon bison area of concentration maps (web)... 213 (8.8%) 10 Other:... 43 (1.8%) 2.4 What is your primary purpose for hunting bison? (Check all that apply) PURP 1 Food... 669 (92%) 2 Trophy... 12 (2%) 3 Other... 45 (6%) 2.5 Are you aware that Environment Yukon is encouraging hunters to harvest a cow bison? HVCOW 1 Yes... 646 (95%) 2 No... 37 (5%) 2.6 Would you prefer to harvest a cow or a bull bison? PRCOW 1 Cow... 246 (36%) 2 Bull... 48 (7%) 3 No preference... 389 (57%) 2.7 Did you harvest a bison during the 2014-2015 hunting season? MHAR 1 Yes... 137 (20%) 2 No... 458 (67%) 3 Did not hunt... 88 (13%) (If you did not hunt bison during the 2014-2015 season, please proceed directly to Part 4) 17 / 26

2.8 Compared to the last time you held a bison seal, did your 2014-2015 bison hunting effort: EFF Stay the same 220 (43%) Increase 167 (33%) Decrease 122 (24%) Why did your effort increase: EFFI Why did your effort decrease: EFFD (Check all that apply) (Check all that apply) A More available time... 71 (19%) A Lack of time... 59 (32%) B More disposable income... 10 (3%) B Too costly... 5 (3%) C Available hunting partner(s)... 51 (13%) C Available hunting partner(s)... 18 (10%) D Better equipped... 35 (9%) D Lack of equipment... 6 (3%) E Wanted to get outdoors... 40 (10%) E Health/injury... 9 (5%) F Difficulty finding bison... 47 (12%) F Difficulty finding bison... 19 (10%) G Greater need for meat... 38 (10%) G Less need for meat... 12 (6%) H Better weather conditions... 34 (9%) H Poorer weather conditions... 20 (11%) I Regulations... 8 (2%) I Regulations... 3 (2%) J Other:... 47 (12%) J Other:... 36 (19%) K None of the above... K None of the above 18 / 26

2.9 As best as you can, indicate the number of days that you hunted for bison in each month in 2014-2015. Please count each partial day as 1 full day. Month No. of Days Trip 1 Trip 2 Trip 3 Trip 4 Trip 5 September 1 day 19 (29%) 9 (64%) 2 (67%) SEP 2 days 17 (26%) 4 (29%) 1 (33%) 3 days 6 (9%) 1 (7%) 4 days 17 (26%) 5 days 3 (5%) 6 days October OCT November NOV December DEC January JAN February FEB March MAR 7+ days 4 (6%) 1 day 36 (47%) 7 (54%) 2 days 17 (22%) 4 (31%) 3 days 8 (11%) 1 (8%) 4 days 2 (3%) 1 (8%) 5 days 4 (5%) 6 days 1 (1%) 7+ days 8 (11%) 1 day 56 (37%) 11 (52%) 3 (50%) 2 (67%) 2 (100%) 2 days 32 (21%) 4 (19%) 3 (50%) 1 (33%) 3 days 23 (15%) 5 (24%) 4 days 25 (16%) 5 days 8 (5%) 6 days 3 (2%) 7+ days 5 (3%) 1 day 48 (35%) 13 (72%) 4 (80%) 2 (100%) 1 (100%) 2 days 45 (33%) 4 (22%) 1 (20%) 3 days 23 (17%) 1 (6%) 4 days 12 (9%) 5 days 5 (4%) 6 days 2 (1%) 7+ days 1 (1%) 1 day 26 (32%) 1 (20%) 2 (67%) 2 days 28 (34%) 2 (40%) 1 (33%) 3 days 10 (12%) 1 (20%) 4 days 8 (10%) 1 (20%) 5 days 2 (2%) 6 days 2 (2%) 7+ days 6 (7%) 1 day 40 (23%) 8 (53%) 5 (100%) 1 (100%) 2 days 38 (22%) 4 (27%) 3 days 29 (17%) 2 (13%) 4 days 25 (15%) 1 (7%) 5 days 20 (12%) 6 days 5 (3%) 7+ days 14 (8%) 1 day 56 (21%) 16 (42%) 7 (47%) 2 (33%) 1 (100%) 2 days 59 (22%) 10 (26%) 3 (20%) 3 (50%) 3 days 50 (19%) 7 (18%) 3 (20%) 1 (17%) 4 days 46 (17%) 3 (8%) 2 (13%) 5 days 16 (6%) 2 (5%) 6 days 16 (6%) 7+ days 21 (8%) 19 / 26

Part 3: Most Recent Yukon Hunting Trips Hunting Effort for your 3 most recent bison hunting trips of the 2014-2015 hunting season, September to March. Please consider each partial day of hunting as one whole day, and any partial day trips (e.g. an afternoon hunt or carrying a gun when traveling the highway in case the opportunity to take an animal arises) as a single hunting trip. Was there a most recent trip? Was this a planned hunting trip? How many people were in the hunting party? (including yourself) How many people in your party had a bison seal? How many bison were harvested by your hunting party? Start date of hunting trip Number of days you hunted Total length of trip Choice Yes No Yes PLND No 1 person HNTR 2 people 3 people 4-6 people 7+ people 1 person SEAL 2 people 3 people 4-6 people 7+ people 0 BHRV 1 2 3 4+ January DATE February March September October November December 0 DAYS 1 2 3 4 5 6+ days 1 day LEN 2 days 3 days 4 days 5 days 6-10 days 7+ days 1 st Most Recent Trip M (2014/15) 547 (100%) 2 495 (93%) 39 (7%) 34 (6%) 251 (46%) 153 (28%) 90 (17%) 12 (2%) 92 (17%) 260 (48%) 122 (23%) 56 (10%) 8 (1%) 355 (66%) 126 (23%) 39 (7%) 6 (1%) 12 (2%) 36 (7%) 81 (15%) 254 (47%) 28 (5%) 31 (6%) 59 (11%) 48 (9%) 188 (35%) 115 (21%) 93 (17%) 64 (12%) 32 (6%) 47 (9%) 188 (35%) 115 (21%) 93 (17%) 64 (12%) 32 (6%) 47 (9%) 2 nd Most Recent Trip S (2014/15) 279 (52%) 260 (48%) 257 (95%) 14 (5%) 29 (10%) 147 (53%) 63 (23%) 34 (12%) 5 (2%) 57 (21%) 151 (55%) 53 (19%) 15 (5%) 248 (90%) 23 (8%) 4 (1%) 21 (8%) 66 (24%) 51 (19%) 17 (6%) 17 (6%) 56 (21%) 45 (16%) 110 (40%) 73 (26%) 41 (15%) 25 (9%) 11 (4%) 17 (6%) 110 (40%) 73 (26%) 41 (15%) 25 (9%) 11 (4%) 17 (6%) 3 rd Most Recent Trip T (2014/15) 146 (52%) 133 (48%) 130 (92%) 11 (8%) 15 (10%) 88 (60%) 21 (14%) 20 (14%) 2 (1%) 40 (27%) 79 (54%) 19 (13%) 8 (5%) 125 (86) 14 (10) 6 (4) 1 (1) ( ) 15 (11%) 18 (13%) 20 (14%) 18 (13%) 10 (7%) 28 (20%) 29 (21%) 77 (53%) 28 (19%) 17 (12%) 14 (10%) 5 (3%) 3 (2%) 77 (53%) 28 (19%) 17 (12%) 14 (10%) 5 (3%) 3 (2%) 20 / 26

What types of transportation did you use on your hunting trip, including getting to the hunting area? (Check all that apply) In which Game Management Subzone(s) (GMS s) did you hunt? (see enclosed map) Did you harvest a bison on this trip? ATV or Argo TRN1 Vehicle - on road TRN2 Vehicle - 4x4 off-road TRN3 Snowmobile TRN4 On foot TRN5 Horseback TRN6 Skis/ snowshoes TRN7 Other TRN8 Zone 414 GMS1-5 Zone 504 Zone 511 Zone 520 Zone 524 Zone 525 Zone 526 Zone 530 Zone 531 Zone 532 Zone 533 Zone 534 Zone 535 Zone 536 Zone 537 Zone 538 Zone 539 Zone 540 Zone 541 Zone 542 Zone 543 Zone 544 Zone 545 Zone 546 Zone 547 Zone 548 Zone 549 Zone 550 Zone 610 Zone 611 Zone 701 Zone 702 Zone 703 Zone 704 Zone 705 Zone 715 Zone 716 Zone 802 Yes HRV No 96 (11%) 171 (19%) 75 (8%) 372 (42%) 139 (16%) 2 25 (3%) 4 8 (1%) 26 (3%) 2 7 (1%) 6 (1%) 4 (1%) 11 (1%) 2 41 (5%) 14 (2%) 76 (10%) 55 (7%) 69 (9%) 31 (4%) 73 (10%) 64 (8%) 66 (9%) 62 (8%) 36 (5%) 47 (6%) 26 (3%) 3 2 9 (1%) 3 118 (22%) 427 (78%) 45 (10%) 94 (21%) 40 (9%) 173 (39%) 80 (18%) 4 (1%) 9 (2%) 2 (1%) 7 (2%) 8 (2%) 2 (1%) 6 (2%) 2 (1%) 14 (4%) 3 (1%) 35 (9%) 29 (7%) 28 (7%) 12 (3%) 42 (11%) 33 (8%) 52 (13%) 40 (10%) 31 (8%) 19 (5%) 11 (3%) 2 (1%) 2 (1%) 10 (4%) 268 (96%) 48 (21%) 32 (14%) 80 (34%) 49 (21%) 20 (9%) 4 (2%) 3 (1%) 15 (7%) 4 (2%) 8 (4%) 18 (8%) 9 (4%) 7 (3%) 22 (10%) 12 (6%) 35 (16%) 25 (12%) 12 (6%) 17 (8%) 10 (5%) 4 (2%) 5 (2%) 4 (2%) 2 (1%) 12 (8%) 133 (92%) 21 / 26

If Yes, In which Game Management Subzone (GMS)? If you harvested a bison on this trip, did you share the animal amongst the hunting party? If you harvested a bison, what was the sex of your bison? Zone 511 HVZ Zone 526 Zone 530 Zone 533 Zone 534 Zone 536 Zone 538 Zone 539 Zone 540 Zone 541 Zone 542 Zone 543 Zone 544 Zone 545 Zone 546 Zone 547 Zone 548 Zone 549 Zone 550 Zone 701 Zone 704 Yes SHAR No Hunted alone Male BSEX Female 1 (1%) 1 (1%) 2 (2%) 1 (1%) 1 (1%) 1 (1%) 10 (9%) 2 (2%) 14 (12%) 7 (6%) 15 (13%) 10 (9%) 5 (4%) 10 (9%) 7 (6%) 11 (10%) 5 (4%) 5 (4%) 2 (2%) 1 (1%) 2 (2%) 96 (81%) 18 (15%) 5 (4%) 77 (66%) 40 (34%) 1 (11%) 2 (22%) 1 (11%) 1 (11%) 2 (22%) 2 (22%) 10 (100%) 5 (50%) 5 (50%) 1 (10%) 2 (20%) 1 (10%) 2 (20%) 1 (10%) 2 (20%) 1 (10%) 11 (92%) 1 (8%) 4 (33%) 8 (67%) Was it the sex that you intended to harvest? How many other bison hunting parties did you see during your hunt? Yes HVSX No 0/none PRTY 1 2 3 4 5 6 or more parties 59 (67%) 29 (33%) 173 (34%) 87 (17%) 98 (19%) 57 (11%) 34 (7%) 25 (5%) 30 (6%) 5 (83%) 1 (17%) 72 (30%) 53 (22%) 62 (26%) 24 (10%) 10 (4%) 12 (5%) 10 (4%) 8 (89%) 1 (11%) 43 (34%) 28 (22%) 25 (20%) 10 (8%) 11 (9%) 6 (5%) 4 (3%) 3.2 Overall, how satisfied were you with your bison hunting experience in 2014-2015? (Circle one): SATEX Very Somewhat Neither Satisfied or Somewhat Satisfied Very Satisfied Don t Know 1 2 3 4 5 DK 88 N/A 77 21 (4%) 60 (11%) 87 (16%) 138 (25%) 232 (43%) 3 (1%) What would improve your experience? EXIMP Why: EXWHY N/A 22 / 26

Part 4: Overall Satisfaction 4.1 How satisfied are you with how clearly the bison hunting rules are explained in the annual hunting regulations summary? (Circle one): SATRL Very Somewhat Neither Satisfied or Somewhat Satisfied Very Satisfied Don t Know 1 2 3 4 5 DK 88 N/A 77 29 (3%) 31 (4%) 96 (11%) 234 (27%) 456 (52%) 23 (3%) 11 (1%) What changes, if any, would you suggest? DISRL Why: CHNRL 4.2 How satisfied are you with how clearly the bison hunting rules and information materials were presented on the Environment Yukon Website? (Circle one): SATWB Very Somewhat Neither Satisfied or Somewhat Satisfied Very Satisfied Don t Know 1 2 3 4 5 DK 88 N/A 77 14 (2%) 19 (2%) 70 (8%) 147 (17%) 283 (32%) 182 (21%) 165 (19%) What changes, if any, would you suggest? WBCHG Why: WBWHY 4.3 How satisfied are you with how helpful Environment Yukon bison area of concentration maps on the website are in planning your bison hunting trip? (Circle one): SATMP Very Somewhat Neither Satisfied or Somewhat Satisfied Very Satisfied Don t Know 1 2 3 4 5 DK 88 N/A 77 19 (2%) 62 (7%) 91 (10%) 158 (18%) 210 (24%) 189 (22%) 146 (17%) What changes, if any, would you suggest? MPCHG Why: MPWHY N/A N/A N/A 23 / 26

4.4 How satisfied overall are you with your experiences dealing with Environment Yukon staff in providing information and addressing your questions or concerns related to bison in 2014-2015? (Circle one): SATSF Very Somewhat Neither Satisfied or Somewhat Satisfied Very Satisfied Don t Know 1 2 3 4 5 DK 88 N/A 77 17 (2%) 12 (1%) 47 (5%) 106 (12%) 602 (69%) 47 (5%) 38 (4%) What changes, if any, would you suggest? SFCHG Why: SFWHY N/A 24 / 26

Part 5: About you We would like to determine if there are connections between peoples backgrounds and their harvest effort. Your individual responses will be combined with others so that you will not be personally identified. 5.1 You are: SEX Male... 801 (91%) Female... 76 (9%) 5.2 What is your present age? years AGE 12-18 yrs... 12 (1%) 19-30 yrs... 129 (15%) 31-45 yrs... 309 (36%) 46-64 yrs... 314 (36%) 65+ yrs... 106 (12%) 5.3 How many years of overall big game hunting experience do you have, including bison and/or other species? years HNYRS less than 5 years... 132 (15%) "5-9 years"... 69 (8%) "10-14 years"... 93 (11%) "15-19 years"... 81 (9%) "20-29 years"... 153 (18%) "30-39 years"... 132 (15%) "40-49 years"... 121 (14%) "50+ years"... 86 (10%) 5.4 How many of these years were: A. In Yukon? years YKHYR less than 5 years... 238 (27%) "5-9 years"... 95 (11%) "10-14 years"... 111 (13%) "15-19 years"... 83 (10%) "20-29 years"... 152 (18%) "30-39 years"... 92 (11%) "40-49 years"... 71 (8%) "50+ years"... 25 (3%) B. Outside of Yukon? years OYHYR less than 5 years... 554 (64%) "5-9 years"... 50 (6%) "10-14 years"... 82 (9%) "15-19 years"... 54 (6%) "20-29 years"... 73 (8%) "30-39 years"... 39 (5%) "40-49 years"... 9 (1%) "50+ years"... 5 (1%) 25 / 26

5.5 In which community were you living on November 15, 2014? COHMT Beaver Creek Marsh Lake 14 (2%) Burwash Landing 5 (1%) Mayo 11 (1%) Carcross 21 (2%) Old Crow Carmacks 11 (1%) Pelly Crossing Dawson City 14 (2%) Ross River 3 Destruction Bay 5 (1%) Tagish 14 (2%) Faro 2 Teslin 2 Haines Junction 46 (5%) Watson Lake 8 (1%) Keno or Elsa Whitehorse 682 (78%) Other (please specify): 38 (4%) Additional Comments? GENCM That is the end of the survey. Thank you for your cooperation! 26 / 26