The Theory and (Best) Practices of Liability-Driven Investment (LDI)

Similar documents
The Theory and (Best) Practices of Liability-Driven Investment (LDI)

1 What is Game Theory? Game Theory 1. Introduction. Rational Agents. Rational Agents in Game Theory

Morningstar Investor Return

BANK SIZE AND INTEREST-RATE SENSITIVITY OF BANK STOCK RETURNS

Constructing Absolute Return Funds with ETFs: A Dynamic Risk-Budgeting Approach. July 2008

Genetic Algorithms in Multi-Stage Portfolio Optimization System

Optimal Portfolio Strategy with Discounted Stochastic Cash Inflows

Received August 16, 2013; revised September 27, 2013; accepted October 26, 2013

Lifecycle Funds. T. Rowe Price Target Retirement Fund. Lifecycle Asset Allocation

Strategic Decision Making in Portfolio Management with Goal Programming Model

A Liability Tracking Portfolio for Pension Fund Management

KEY CONCEPTS AND PROCESS SKILLS. 1. An allele is one of the two or more forms of a gene present in a population. MATERIALS AND ADVANCE PREPARATION

Evaluating Portfolio Policies: A Duality Approach

A Probabilistic Approach to Worst Case Scenarios

Do Competitive Advantages Lead to Higher Future Rates of Return?

DYNAMIC portfolio optimization is one of the important

Evaluating the Performance of Forecasting Models for Portfolio Allocation Purposes with Generalized GRACH Method

Sudden Stops, Sectoral Reallocations, and Real Exchange Rates

San Francisco State University ECON 560 Fall Midterm Exam 2. Tuesday, October hour, 15 minutes

The Great Recession in the U.K. Labour Market: A Transatlantic View

Information Sharing on the Bullwhip Effect in a Four-Level Supply Chain

The APT with Lagged, Value-at-Risk and Asset Allocations by Using Econometric Approach

Methods for Estimating Term Structure of Interest Rates

Paul M. Sommers David U. Cha And Daniel P. Glatt. March 2010 MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE ECONOMICS DISCUSSION PAPER NO

Asset Allocation with Higher Order Moments and Factor Models

Stock Return Expectations in the Credit Market

Economic Growth & Development: Part 3 Horizontal Innovation Models: Applications. By Kiminori Matsuyama. Updated on , 6:12:26 PM

Performance Attribution for Equity Portfolios

ANALYSIS OF RELIABILITY, MAINTENANCE AND RISK BASED INSPECTION OF PRESSURE SAFETY VALVES

Time & Distance SAKSHI If an object travels the same distance (D) with two different speeds S 1 taking different times t 1

CONNECTIONS. Key Words Splices, Bolted Splice, Bolted Column Splice, Minor Axis Splice

QUANTITATIVE FINANCE RESEARCH CENTRE. Optimal Time Series Momentum QUANTITATIVE FINANCE RESEARCH CENTRE QUANTITATIVE F INANCE RESEARCH CENTRE

An Alternative Mathematical Model for Oxygen Transfer Evaluation in Clean Water

LSU RISK ASSESSMENT FORM Please read How to Complete a Risk Assessment before completion

Guidance Statement on Calculation Methodology

The design of courier transportation networks with a nonlinear zero-one programming model

Proportional Reasoning

Using Rates of Change to Create a Graphical Model. LEARN ABOUT the Math. Create a speed versus time graph for Steve s walk to work.

Market Timing with GEYR in Emerging Stock Market: The Evidence from Stock Exchange of Thailand

Interpreting Sinusoidal Functions

Mattaponi Sundowners

Market timing and statistical arbitrage: Which market timing opportunities arise from equity price busts coinciding with recessions?

Simulation based approach for measuring concentration risk

The t-test. What We Will Cover in This Section. A Research Situation

Chapter / rev/min Ans. C / in. C mm Ans teeth Ans. C / mm Ans.

Instruction Manual. Rugged PCB type. 1 Terminal Block. 2 Function. 3 Series Operation and Parallel Operation. 4 Assembling and Installation Method

(I Got Spurs That) Jingle Jangle Jingle lyrics Tex Ritter

Asset and Liability Management, Caisse. a manager of public debt

Sources of Over-Performance in Equity Markets: Mean Reversion, Common Trends and Herding

Betting Against Beta

Capacity Utilization Metrics Revisited: Delay Weighting vs Demand Weighting. Mark Hansen Chieh-Yu Hsiao University of California, Berkeley 01/29/04

James Sefton and Sylvain Champonnois London Quant Conference September 2012

Time-Variation in Diversification Benefits of Commodity, REITs, and TIPS 1

World gold prices and stock returns in China: insights for hedging and diversification strategies

FINVEX WHITE PAPER ON ASSET ALLOCATION WITH RISK FACTORS

The credit portfolio management by the econometric models: A theoretical analysis

Monte Carlo simulation modelling of aircraft dispatch with known faults

The Current Account as A Dynamic Portfolio Choice Problem

Bootstrapping Multilayer Neural Networks for Portfolio Construction

Mattaponi Sundowners

Flow Switch LABO-VHZ-S

What the Puck? an exploration of Two-Dimensional collisions

Neighborhood & Community Services Department

296 Finance a úvěr-czech Journal of Economics and Finance, 64, 2014, no. 4

Can Optimized Portfolios Beat 1/N?

Prepared by: Candice A. Churchwell, Senior Consultant Aimee C. Savage, Project Analyst. June 17, 2014 CALMAC ID SCE0350

Performance Optimization of Markov Models in Simulating Computer Networks

Avoiding Component Failure in Industrial Refrigeration Systems

3. The amount to which $1,000 will grow in 5 years at a 6 percent annual interest rate compounded annually is

The Effects of Systemic Risk on the Allocation between Value and Growth Portfolios

Idiosyncratic Volatility, Stock Returns and Economy Conditions: The Role of Idiosyncratic Volatility in the Australian Stock Market

VLSI Design I; A. Milenkovic 1

Revisiting the Growth of Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan, From the Perspective of a Neoclassical Model

Economics 487. Homework #4 Solution Key Portfolio Calculations and the Markowitz Algorithm

CS 410/584, Algorithm Design & Analysis, Lecture Notes 5

Valuing Volatility Spillovers

2017 MCM/ICM Merging Area Designing Model for A Highway Toll Plaza Summary Sheet

Portfolio Efficiency: Traditional Mean-Variance Analysis versus Linear Programming

The Measuring System for Estimation of Power of Wind Flow Generated by Train Movement and Its Experimental Testing

Automatic air-main charging and pressure control system for compressed air supplies

Numerical Modeling of a Planing Hull Maneuvering in a Regular Wave, Part 1: Dynamic Instability

ITG Dynamic Daily Risk Model for Europe

A Statistical, Age-Structured, Life-History-Based Stock Assessment Model for Anadromous Alosa

COVER S UNIVERSAL PORTFOLIO, STOCHASTIC PORTFOLIO THEORY AND THE NUMÉRAIRE PORTFOLIO

Modeling of a Single DOF Force Feedback Teleoperation System

Macro Sensitive Portfolio Strategies

Flexible Seasonal Closures in the Northern Prawn Fishery

The Construction of a Bioeconomic Model of the Indonesian Flying Fish Fishery

Chapter : Linear Motion 1

Dynamics of market correlations: Taxonomy and portfolio analysis

Online Portfolio Selection: A Survey

Testing Portfolio Efficiency with Non-Traded Assets: Taking into Account Labor Income, Housing and Liabilities

LEWA intellidrive. The mechatronic All-in-One pump system. intelligent flexible dynamic high precision. Foto: ratiopharm

Homework 2. is unbiased if. Y is consistent if. c. in real life you typically get to sample many times.

The safe ships trajectory in a restricted area

The Formation of the Deposit Portfolio in Macroeconomic Instability

1. The value of the digit 4 in the number 42,780 is 10 times the value of the digit 4 in which number?

Improving Measurement Uncertainty of Differential Pressures at High Line Pressures & the Potential Impact on the Global Economy & Environment.

CMA DiRECtions for ADMinistRAtion GRADE 6. California Modified Assessment. test Examiner and Proctor Responsibilities

Semi-Fixed-Priority Scheduling: New Priority Assignment Policy for Practical Imprecise Computation

Transcription:

DHC Ae Managemen Day 2007 Geneva March 3 h 6:00-8:00 he heory and (Be) Pracice of iabiliy-driven Invemen (DI) ionel Marellini Profeor of inance DHC Buine School Scienific Direcor DHC Rik and Ae Managemen Reearch Cenre lionel.marellini@edhec.edu.edhec-rik.com

Inroducion A Brief Hiory of AM An Academic Perpecive on DI Soluion A Numerical Illuraion Implemening iabiliy-maching Porfolio Concluion Mahemaical Appendix Ouline

Inroducion A Brief Hiory of AM An Academic Perpecive on DI Soluion A Numerical Illuraion Implemening iabiliy-maching Porfolio Concluion Mahemaical Appendix

Inroducion Penion und Crii S&P 500 DB Penion Plan Ne urplu over $200 billion Ne defici over $200 billion in abou 3 year $400 000 40% (in million $300 000 $200 000 $00 000 $0 -$00 000 99 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 2000 200 2002 2003 2004 20% 00% 80% -$200 000 -$300 000 penion funding au 60% 99 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 2000 200 2002 2003 2004 Penion funding raio 350 300 250 200 50 00 50 0 2000 200 2002 2003 2004 Overfunded fund Underfunded fund Source: S&P 500 Penion Sau Repor 2005

Inroducion Penion und Crii he iuaion ha improved recenly bu remain problemaic. By ome eimae () he aggregae penion defici decreaed by $4.8 billion during 2005 leaving an aggregae penion defici of $96.0 billion for he 00 companie involved in he Milliman penion fund urvey 2006. During he pa hree year he funding defici for he 00 companie ha been reduced by $67.5 billion. 2 ou of he 00 companie ere in a urplu poiion a he end of 2005 up from 9 in 2004 7 in 2003 and only in 2002 alhough ill ignificanly le han he 90 ha had urplu ae a he end of 999. () Milliman penion fund urvey 2006: hp://.milliman.com/penion_fund_urvey/.

o primary caue Inroducion Origin of he Crii Marke Condiion Perfec orm of advere marke condiion Decline in equiy marke decreae in penion plan ae Decreae in inere rae increae in penion liabiliie Weakne of rik managemen and ae allocaion pracice Could he crii have been avoided by beer ae allocaion deciion?

mai-05 Inroducion Perfec Sorm of Advere Marke Condiion Bae rae in US urope and UK 700 voluion of S&P 500 index 600 500 400 300 200 Rae in % 00 000 janv-05 janv-00 mai-00 ep-00 janv-0 mai-0 ep-0 janv-02 mai-02 ep-02 janv-03 mai-03 ep-03 janv-04 mai-04 ep-04 UK USA U

Inroducion Ae Allocaion & Rik Managemen (Mi)Pracice Invemen in equiy By 992 % holding in equiie by penion fund ere 75% in he UK 47% in he US 8% in he Neherland and 3% in Sizerland. A a reul of he dominaion of equiie he increae in liabiliy value ha folloed he decreae in inere rae a only parially offe by he parallel increae in he value of he bond porfolio. Wa exceive invemen in equiy before he ar of he bear marke he real problem? In 200 miday hrough he bear marke penion fund had 64% of heir oal ae in equiie in he UK 60% in he US 50% in he Neherland and 39% in Sizerland. Beer ae allocaion and rik managemen pracice ould have avoided he penion fund crii and migh help conribue in finding a oluion o he problem.

Inroducion A Brief Hiory of AM An Academic Perpecive on DI Soluion A Numerical Illuraion Implemening iabiliy-maching Porfolio Concluion Mahemaical Appendix

Cah-flo maching & immunizaion A (Very) Brief Hiory of AM Differen Approache o AM Cah-flo maching: involve a perfec mach beeen he cah flo from he porfolio of ae and he commimen in he liabiliie; inflaion-linked inrumen are ofen ued in ha perpecive. Immunizaion: o he exen ha perfec maching i no poible hi echnique allo he reidual inere rae rik creaed by he imperfec mach beeen he ae and liabiliie o be managed in an opimal ay. AM counerpar: inveing in rik-free ae. Surplu opimizaion In a concern o improve he profiabiliy of he ae and herefore o reduce he level of conribuion i i neceary o inroduce ino he raegic allocaion ae clae (ock nominal bond) ha are no perfecly correlaed ih he liabiliie. AM counerpar: inveing in opimal riky porfolio.

Miing ingredien? A (Very) Brief Hiory of AM ooking orard o-fund eparaion heorem: in AM he opimal porfolio involve a combinaion of he rik-free ae and he riky porfolio ih be rikreurn rade-off. Porfolio inurance: hee raegie generae a limied expoure o he riky porfolio hen i perform ell and a donide rik proecion hen i perform poorly. Quid of DI oluion?

Inroducion A Brief Hiory of AM An Academic Perpecive on DI Soluion A Numerical Illuraion Implemening iabiliy-maching Porfolio Concluion Mahemaical Appendix

An Academic Perpecive on DI Soluion Objecive Objecive: here he invemen policy i a (column) predicable proce vecor repreening allocaion o riky ae ih he remainder inveed in he rik-free ae. Differen from andard AM problem (Meron (969 97)): In AM ha maer i no ae value per e bu ae value relaive o liabiliy value (a.k.a. funding raio). A Max A Max

An Academic Perpecive on DI Soluion Soluion Opimal porfolio raegy (ee he Appendix for noaion and proof) ( ') ( μ r ) + ( ') We hu obain a o (hree) fund eparaion heorem he fir porfolio i he andard log-opimal efficien porfolio. Amoun inveed i inverely proporional o he inveor Arro- Pra coefficien of rik-averion. he econd porfolio i a liabiliy-hedging porfolio: i can be hon o have he highe correlaion ih he liabiliie; alernaively i i a porfolio ha minimize he local volailiy of he funding raio. 2 2 ' ' ' ( )( ' ) + ' 2 ε

An Academic Perpecive on DI Soluion iabiliy-hedging Porfolio 025 02 Relaive MSD ronier 05 xcee reur 0 iabiliy Hedging Porfolio 005 0 0 005 0 05 02 025 03 Relaive Rik

An Academic Perpecive on DI Soluion iabiliy-maching Porfolio 03 025 02 xp. Reur 05 Relaive MSD ronier 0 005 iabiliy Maching Porfolio 0 0 005 0 05 02 025 03 035 Relaive Rik

An Academic Perpecive on DI Soluion Building block # DI Soluion hi i cah-flo or duraion maching: ue derivaive along ih radiional fixed-income inrumen o manage he inere rae rik (immunizaion/dedicaion). everage can be ued in hi leg. hi par i cuomized ih repec o he liabiliy rucure of he clien. Building block # 2 here i a need for rik managemen and no only ae managemen in performance eeking porfolio. In principle hi par i independen of he clien. Allocaion o hee o building block i aic and depend on rik-averion.

An Academic Perpecive on DI Soluion unding Raio Conrain In mo counrie implici or explici funding raio conrain are in effec In he Unied Sae he Penion Benefi Guarany Corporaion (PBGC) hich provide a parial inurance of penion charge a higher premium o fund reporing a funding level of under 90% of "curren" liabiliie. In GB here a a Minimum unding Requiremen (MR) ha came ino effec in 995; he 2004 Penion Bill ha replaced he MR ih a cheme-pecific auory funding objecive o be deermined by he ponoring firm and fund ruee. In Germany Penionkaen and Penionfond mu be fully funded a all ime o he exen of he guaranee hey have given. In Sizerland he minimum funding level i 00% ih an incenive o conervaive managemen (invemen in equiie for example i limied o 30% of oal ae for fund ih le han 0% coverage raio). In he Neherland he minimum funding level i 05% plu addiional buffer for invemen rik. A k Max We capure hi in he folloing ay:

An Academic Perpecive on DI Soluion Opimal porfolio raegy MR Conrain Dynamic DI Soluion k ( ) ( ') ( μ r ) + ( ') We no have a ae-dependen a oppoed o aic allocaion o he o fund. he fir porfolio i he andard mean-variance efficien porfolio. Conider he fracion of ealh A allocaed o he opimal groh porfolio I i given by ' m ( ') ( μ r) ( ') ( μ r) ' ( ') ( μ r) A k ' ( ') ( μ r) A ( A k ) k

An Academic Perpecive on DI Soluion MR Conrain Inerpreaion I appear ha he fracion of ealh A allocaed o he opimal groh porfolio i equal o a conan muliple m of he cuhion i.e. he difference beeen he ae value and he floor defined a A -k. ' ( ') ( μ r) m hi i reminicen of CPPI raegie hich he preen eup exend o a relaive rik managemen conex. While CPPI raegie are deigned o preven final erminal ealh from falling belo a pecific hrehold exended CPPI raegie (a.k.a. coningen immunizaion raegie) are deigned o proec ae value from falling belo a pre-pecified fracion of ome benchmark value here liabiliy value.

Inroducion A Brief Hiory of AM An Academic Perpecive on DI Soluion A Numerical Illuraion Implemening iabiliy-maching Porfolio Concluion Mahemaical Appendix

A Numerical Illuraion Generaing Scenario here are 3 main rik facor affecing ae and liabiliy value Inere rae rik() Inflaion rik Sock price rik xample of a andard model () dr a dl ds S r a l dπ a r ( l r ) d + rdw l ( bl l ) d + ldw π π ( bπ π ) d + πdw x ( r + π ) d + b d + dw x x Model calibraed o a o be conien ih long-erm parameer eimae () () Modeling of conomic Serie Coordinaed ih Inere Rae Scenario (2004) by Ahlgrim D'Arcy and Gorve ( reearch projec ponored by he Sociey of Acuarie).

A Numerical Illuraion Sylized Penion und Problem Sylized penion fund problem We conider a ream of inflaion-proeced fixed paymen (normalized a 00) for he nex 20 year. o achieve hi goal ome iniial conribuion i required. One naural oluion coni of buying equal amoun of zerocoupon IPS ih mauriie ranging from year o 20 year (liabiliy maching porfolio). he performance hoever i poor. ind preen value of liabiliy-maching porfolio (0); e obain (0) 777.5 (raher cloe o 20x00 very expenive!) Diribuion of urplu a dae 20: rivial (no poible defici). So a o ave on he neceary conribuion i i reaonable o add riky ae clae o pice up he reurn. here i a (defici) rik involved hoever.

A Numerical Illuraion Reul Opimal Porfolio Wih and Wihou he MP ock bond iab-p A 0% 0% 00% 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 (0.00%) 777.5 0.00% B 9% 22% 59% 376.78 423.65 5.50% 204.45 (.50%) 556.99 2.39% C 43% 4% 6% 30.33 478.9 8.70% 427.92 (24.08%) 34.07 26.06% D 52% 45% 3% 507. 2093.77 9.60% 502.64 (28.28%) 233.58 30.59% A' 0% 90% 0% 0.00 508.92 36.60% 432.34 (24.33%) 777.5 0.00% B' 20% 80% 0% 376.78 640.24 25.20% 385.97 (2.72%) 556.99 2.39% C' 43% 57% 0% 30.33 500. 9.30% 457.69 (25.75%) 34.07 26.06% D' 5% 49% 0% 507. 2094.78 20.00% 499.2 (28.09%) 233.58 30.59% all value are given a preen value a aring dae (iniial invemen a of 777.5 ha i he preen value of liabiliie) loe relaive o (0) in parenhee eigh expeced Surplu volailiy of urplu Prob(S<0) expeced horfall neceary nominal conribuion relaive Conribuion Saving p.a.

A Numerical Illuraion Diribuion of inal Surplu/Defici Diribuion of final urplu/defici

A Numerical Illuraion AM veru AM A porfolio efficien in an AM ene i no necearily efficien in an AM ene and vice-vera.

A Numerical Illuraion Dynamic Porfolio Sraegie We no urn o dynamic porfolio raegie. We conider 6 differen implemenaion of he exended coningen immunizaion mehod. We ake he ock-bond porfolio ih highe Sharpe raio a performance porfolio (ih our choice of parameer value and 4% rik-free rae e obain he folloing porfolio: 30.9% in ock and 69.% in bond) Cae o 3: k90% and m234 Cae 4 o 6: k95% and m234 Reul ho very ignifican rik managemen benefi.

A Numerical Illuraion Saic veru Dynamic Sraegie dynamic CPPI expeced Surplu volailiy of urplu Prob(S<0) expeced horfall neceary nominal conribuion p.a. relaive Conribuion Saving p.a. m2 k0.90 78.243 4.939 30.20% 72.60 (4.08%) 720.32 3.20% m3 k0.90 09.308 24.437 34.30% 99.2 (5.58%) 699.23 4.38% m4 k0.90 25.575 262.747 35.80% 23.98 (6.98%) 688.0 5.0% aic CPPI expeced Surplu volailiy of urplu Prob(S<0) expeced horfall neceary nominal conribuion p.a. relaive Conribuion Saving p.a. m2 k0.90 68.078 4.49 23.50% 83.44 (4.70%) 727.7 2.8% m3 k0.90 04.595 77.252 24.40% 23.78 (6.97%) 702.90 4.8% m4 k0.90 42.978 243.978 24.80% 66.20 (9.35%) 678.96 5.52% dynamic CPPI expeced Surplu volailiy of urplu Prob(S<0) expeced horfall neceary nominal conribuion p.a. relaive Conribuion Saving p.a. m2 k0.95 40.667 74.256 30.0% 36.09 (2.03%) 746.6.72% m3 k0.95 6.566 2.649 34.40% 49.27 (2.77%) 73.75 2.55% m4 k0.95 77.23 63.67 38.30% 60.48 (3.40%) 720.72 3.8% aic CPPI expeced Surplu volailiy of urplu Prob(S<0) expeced horfall neceary nominal conribuion p.a. relaive Conribuion Saving p.a. m2 k0.95 33.25 55.499 22.80% 4.80 (2.35%) 75.89.42% m3 k0.95 50.464 84.530 23.20% 62.50 (3.52%) 739.47 2.2% m4 k0.95 68.078 4.49 23.50% 83.44 (4.70%) 727.7 2.8%

A Numerical Illuraion xended CPPI Sraegie

Inroducion A Brief Hiory of AM An Academic Perpecive on DI Soluion A Numerical Illuraion Implemening iabiliy-maching Porfolio Concluion Mahemaical Appendix

Implemening iabiliy-maching Porfolio Cah veru Derivaive Inrumen We have argued ha an opimal AM policy involve inveing in o fund A liabiliy hedging porfolio for rik managemen purpoe. he andard groh opimal porfolio for ae managemen purpoe. here are variou poible non-excluive ay o implemen he liabiliy-maching porfolio Cah inrumen: nominal and real (i.e. inflaion-proeced) bond. Derivaive: fuure ap opion.

Implemening iabiliy-maching Porfolio Inroducing Inflaion Rik xample: Reail Price Inflaion (RPI)-linked annuiie Mach ih inflaion-linked ae bu only an imprecie cahflo mach poible ih index-linked bond Again perfec replicaion of he liabiliy i never poible becaue of he lack of available mauriie in he inflaion-linked marke. Coupon paid on hee bond do no mach liabiliy paymen and have o be reinveed (replicaion ould imply being hor poiion in loer mauriie). 300000000 xample iabiliy lo v IG Cahflo (marke eighed) Marke implied inflaion 250000000 200000000 50000000 00000000 50000000 0 -Apr-52 -Apr-48 -Apr-44 -Apr-40 -Apr-36 -Apr-32 -Apr-28 -Apr-24 -Apr-20 -Apr-6 -Apr-2 -Apr-08 -Apr-04 iabiliy lo Ae lo

Implemening iabiliy-maching Porfolio Uing Sap for everaged Poiion in AM Conider a liabiliy ih benefi ha are predominanly inflaion-linked. herefore inflaion-linked ae ould be an appropriae mach. Inflaion-linked bond are cah inrumen ih loe liabiliy rik. An alernaive ae and liabiliy mach ould be o: Buy a riky porfolio of raigh bond or inve in abolue reurn performance porfolio. Ue he ap marke o conver he bond cahflo o he precie inflaionlinked cahflo required o pay he cheme projeced benefi paymen. Penion cheme pay fixed flo (exraced from he porfolio) Scheme receive inflaion-linked cah flo ailored o mee he projeced liabiliie. Relaive o index-linked gil hi oluion ould: Provide more precie managemen of inflaion rik. Inroduce leverage and hence generae a higher expeced reurn due o addiional performance of riky porfolio bu addiional rik (in cae porfolio underperform he fixed ap rae).

Implemening iabiliy-maching Porfolio rom iabiliy-hedging o iabiliy-maching An inflaion ap can be ued o exchange cah-flo generaed by a bond porfolio for RPI-linked cah-flo o mach he precie naure and iming of annuiy paymen. hi give a more precie inflaion mach han ih index-linked gil and allo freedom o inve in a ide range of underlying ae. RPI/PI linked cahflo o mach benefi paymen RPI/PI linked benefi paymen Bank und Cahflo generaed by performance porfolio 300000000 xample iabiliy lo v IG Cahflo (marke eighed) Marke implied inflaion 300000000 Inflaion-inked Benefi Paymen v Inflaion-inked Sap lo 250000000 250000000 200000000 200000000 50000000 50000000 00000000 00000000 50000000 50000000 0 0 2004 2008 202 206 2020 2024 2028 2032 2036 2004 2008 202 206 iabiliy lo 2020 2024 Ae lo 2028 2032 2036 iabiliy lo Ae lo

Inroducion A Brief Hiory of AM An Academic Perpecive on DI Soluion A Numerical Illuraion Implemening iabiliy-maching Porfolio Concluion Mahemaical Appendix

Concluion Regulaory Conrain and Accouning Impac We have preened a brief overvie of he echnique ued in ae-liabiliy managemen. Modern porfolio heory allo one o: i) raionalize he DI approach a a pecific example of a eparaion heorem hich ae ha rik managemen and performance are be managed hen handled by eparae porfolio. Ii) exend he DI approach o allo for dynamic rik managemen benefi. In pracice he queion remain of incorporaing he ponor company perpecive: oard an inegraed AM model ih raional pricing of liabiliy ream a defaulable ecuriie.

Inroducion A Brief Hiory of AM An Academic Perpecive on DI Soluion A Numerical Illuraion Implemening iabiliy-maching Porfolio Concluion Mahemaical Appendix

Mahemaical Appendix Reference Proof and Mahemaical Preciion More deailed reference and mahemaical reul are preened in ha follo. hi maerial illurae he poer of he change of numeraire echnique ofen ued in derivaive pricing (quano opion exchange opion fixed-income derivaive ec.) in porfolio opimizaion problem. By recognizing ha he liabiliy porfolio i he naural numeraire in hi economy and by conidering porfolio value dynamic under he aociaed equivalen maringale meaure e can ue convex dualiy echnique o olve he opimal allocaion problem.

he Model Ae Price We conider n riky ae he price of hich are given by n i i j dp P id ijdw μ + i... n j A rik-free ae he 0h ae i alo raded in he economy; he reurn on ha ae ypically a defaul free bond i given by dp 0 P 0 rd We aume ha he calar r he (xn) (column) vecor μ (μ ι ) i n and he (nxn) marix ( ij ) ij n are progreively-meaurable and uniformly bounded procee and ha i a non ingular marix ha i alo progreively-meaurable and bounded uniformly. (W) (W W n ) i a andard n-dimenional Bronian moion.

Under hee aumpion he marke i complee and arbiragefree and here exi a unique equivalen maringale meaure Q. Define Z ' ' 0 exp θ dw θ θ d 2 0 0 ( ) here θ i he rik premium proce θ μ he Model Rik Premium Proce ( r ) hen Z i a maringale and Q i he meaure ih a Radon- Nikodym deniy Z ih repec o he hiorical probabiliy meaure P. By Giranov heorem he folloing proce i a Q-maringale Q ( W ) 0 W + θ d 0 0

Inroduce a eparae independen proce for pecific liabiliy rik Becaue of he independence beeen yemaic rik expoure and pecific liabiliy rik e have ha ih + + ε ε μ j n j j dw dw d d he Model iabiliy Proce η η () () () () () + + dw d dw d ε ε ε η μ η 2 ' ' 2 exp 2 exp

In he preence of liabiliy rik ha i no panned by exiing ecuriie he e of all meaure under hich dicouned price are maringale here he rik-free ae i ued a numeraire i given by dq A Q; θ.. Z Z 0 0 dp ih: Z Z ( 0 ) exp ' θ dw 2 0 0 ε 2 ( 0 ) exp θ () dw θ d 2 0 0 he Model MM in he P 0 -Marke ' θ θ d here he rik premium for pure liabiliy rik i (for ε 0) ' ( μ ( θ ) θ r + ε

iabiliie a a Numeraire Porfolio he liabiliy porfolio i he naural numeraire porfolio in hi economy; he value of ae relaive o liabiliie i he funding raio he key variable in AM. he dynamic of relaive price i dpˆ Pˆ d P hich can alo be rien a dpˆ Pˆ Q Q ε dw dw MM in he -Marke i ( P ) ε ( )( dw + ( θ ) d) ( dw + ( θ ) d) i here e have defined he folloing procee (independen Bronian moion under Q - ee nex lide) dw dw Q Q ( θ ) ε dw + d ε dw + ( θ )d ε ε ε ε

iabiliie a a Numeraire Porfolio In he -marke he e of all meaure under hich dicouned price are maringale here he liabiliy porfolio i ued a numeraire i given by dq A Q; θ.. 0 0 dp ih ' ( 0 ) exp κ ( ) dw κ '()() κ d 2 0 0 In he -marke he rik premia are or marke price: or pure liabiliy rik (for ε 0): MM in he -Marke (Con ) ε 2 ( 0 ) exp κ ( ) dw κ () 0 κ 2 ( ) θ ( ) ( ) 0 d () θ ( ) ( ) κ ε

Objecive here he invemen policy i a (column) predicable proce vecor repreening allocaion o riky ae ih he reminder inveed in he rik-free ae Define by he funding raio proce i.e. ae a ime relaive o he liabiliie for an inveor folloing he raegy aring ih iniial ealh A 0 and given iniial liabiliy value 0 he Unconrained Problem Objecive A Max ε ε ε μ μ dw dw d r d r A A d d ' 2 ' ' ' + + + + 0 '... n

he Unconrained Problem Soluion Opimal erminal funding raio value Value funcion ih [ ] η η A A g A J + 2 2 2 2 ' 2 exp ε ε ε θ θ θ g

Opimal porfolio raegy he Unconrained Problem Soluion Con ( ') ( μ r ) + ( ') We hu obain a o (hree) fund eparaion heorem he fir porfolio i he andard log-opimal efficien porfolio. Amoun inveed i inverely proporional o he inveor Arro- Pra coefficien of rik-averion. he econd porfolio i a liabiliy-hedging porfolio: i can be hon o have he highe correlaion ih he liabiliie; alernaively i i a porfolio ha minimize he local volailiy of he funding raio. 2 + 2 ' ' ' ( )( ' ) ' 2 ε

he Unconrained Problem Skech of he Proof Maringale Approach he opimizaion program read uch ha agrangian OC: A Max Q A A A A A η η λ η η A η λ η η A A η η () (2)

he Unconrained Problem Skech of he Proof Con rom () e obain Subiuing (A-3) ino (A-2) e olve for λ hich e plug back ino (3) o ge We hen obain he indirec uiliy funcion and andard calculaion of expecaion of an exponenial of a Gauian variable give he announced reul η η λ η A (3) [ ] η η η η A A [ ] η η J

he Unconrained Problem Skech of he Proof Con o obain opimal porfolio eigh conider Ue Io lemma o find he dynamic of hi funding raio proce and idenify he volailiy erm [ ] [ ] G Q η η η ε ε dw dw d d ' '... + ε ε κ dw dw d G dg '... +

he Unconrained Problem Dynamic Programming Uing he dynamic programming approach e check ha ih and φ a oluion o he non-linear Cauchy problem hich i eparable in and can be rien a: ih g a before. r ϕ ϕ ϕ ϕ μ ' ' + + ϕ ϕ ϕ g 0 2 2 2 + + ϕ μ ϕ ϕ

he Unconrained Problem Welfare Gain from Marke Compleion In he pa fe year invemen bank have ared iuing dedicaed liabiliy-maching OC derivaive. hee dedicaed derivaive oluion allo for beer hedging of inveor liabiliie In pracice hey allo for quai-perfec hedging of financial rik bu no of oher rik (acuarial rik) unle a pecific re-inurance oluion i pu ino place We can eimae he increae in inveor elfare ha ould emanae from compleing he marke a J J 2 ( )( 2 ) κ exp ε ε ε 2 complee 2 incomplee hi meaure can be ued in an empirical exercie. ( )

he Conrained Soluion Minimum unding Requiremen (MR) We no add conrain on he funding raio in a complee marke eup. here can be o ype of conrain explici or implici. In a program ih explici conrain marginal indirec uiliy from ealh diconinuouly jump o infiniy: uch ha In a program ih implici conrain marginal uiliy goe moohly o infiniy a he MR: A Max a.. k A k A Max

he Conrained Soluion Implici Conrain Soluion (Complee Marke) Conider he folloing conrain AM problem Opimal erminal funding raio value Value funcion + + k k A J k k + + k A Max

Opimal porfolio raegy he Conrained Soluion Implici Conrain Soluion Con k ( ) ( ') ( μ r ) + ( ') We no have a ae-dependen a oppoed o aic allocaion o he o fund. he fir porfolio i he andard mean-variance efficien porfolio. Conider he fracion of ealh A allocaed o he opimal groh porfolio I i given by ' m ( ') ( μ r) ( ') ( μ r) ' ( ') ( μ r) A k ' ( ') ( μ r) A ( A k ) k

he Conrained Soluion Implici Conrain Inerpreaion I appear ha he fracion of ealh A allocaed o he opimal groh porfolio i equal o a conan muliple m of he cuhion i.e. he difference beeen he ae value and he floor defined a A -k. ' ( ') ( μ r) m hi i reminicen of CPPI raegie hich he preen eup exend o a relaive rik managemen conex. While CPPI raegie are deigned o preven final erminal ealh from falling belo a pecific hrehold exended CPPI raegie are deigned o proec ae value from falling belo a pre-pecified fracion of ome benchmark value.

he Conrained Problem Skech of he Proof he agrangian read OC: ih λ from he budge conrain [ ] { } k λ k k + λ λ λ + k

he Conrained Problem o obain opimal porfolio eigh conider Skech of he Proof Con G Q ( ) + ( ( )) k ( ) + ( )( ( )) k Ue Io lemma o find he dynamic of hi funding raio proce dg k dg G G κ ' and idenify he volailiy erm ih ' ( G k) κ dw + (...) d dw + (...)d d ( '... d + ' ) dw

he Conrained Souion xplici Conrain Soluion (Complee Marke) Conider he folloing conrain AM problem uch ha Opimal erminal funding raio value Value funcion A Max a.. k A max k J J 0 max max k k k u +

he Conrained Soluion xplici Conrain Soluion Con Opimal porfolio raegy: ih: he fracion of ealh A allocaed o he opimal groh porfolio d kn r d kn μ 2 2 ' ' + 2 ' d k N A r μ ' k d + 2 ' ' 2 2 ) ln( κ κ κ κ

he Conrained Soluion xplici Conrain Inerpreaion Noe ha: A k + max ( u 0) max( u k k + A k 0) he replicaing porfolio for he payoff k coni of inveing in he liabiliy hedging porfolio hich i perfecly correlaed o he liabiliy porfolio in he complee marke eing; i iniial value i k. 0 herefore he opimal raegy coni in allocaing he iniial ealh A 0 o a o inve k 0 in he liabiliy-replicaing porfolio and inve he remaining ealh A 0 k 0 in an opion ha ill deliver he urplu if any of he value of he unconrained payoff i.e. he payoff reuling from folloing he opimal raegy from he unconrained oluion. hi i reminicen of OBPI raegie hich he preen eup exend o a relaive rik managemen conex (exchange opion).

he Conrained Problem Skech of he Proof he agrangian read OC: hen [ ] { } { } k c λ λ c λ λ 0 max λ λ k c k k max max λ

he Conrained Problem o obain opimal porfolio eigh conider G Q ( ) Q k + max ( ) Skech of he Proof Con Price he opion componen and ue Io lemma o find he dynamic of hi funding raio proce and idenify he volailiy erm ih ( d ) ( ) dg kn ' 2 dw (...)d G κ + d ( '... d + ' ) dw k0