September 22-23, 2011
The Experts Cor van der Klaauw Groningen Province Richard ter Avest Goudappel Coffeng Consultancy
The Experts Tonny Bosch Goudappel Coffeng Consultancy Hillie Talens CROW
Cycling in the Netherlands Philosophy and Measures for Increasing Bikeability Hillie Talens Project Manager CROW and Bicycle Ambassador Fietsberaad
Who is she? 5
How does she travel? 6
Content Facts & Figures Benefits for Society The Dutch Touch Bicycle Infrastructure (Engineering) Enforcement & Education Conclusions 7
Bicycle Ownership 1,2 1 0,8 1,11 0,83 0,77 More bicycles than people 0,6 0,4 0,67 0,63 0,50 0,45 0,40 0,40 0,34 Number of cycles per inhabitant 0,2 0,18 0 8
Bike Share: Comparison Netherlands 27% Denmark 18% Germany 10% USA 1% 9
Bike Share in the Netherlands Total modal split 27% 34% of all trips < 4.5 miles 15% of trips 4.5-10 miles Groningen en Zwolle > 50% 10
Trip Motive 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% Car Bicycle 30% 20% 10% 0% Commuter travel Business trips Services/personal care Shopping Education Visit/stay Social recreational Touring/hiking Other Total 11
Daily Trips Average daily nr. of trips by gender 2 1,8 1,6 Daily nr. of trips 1,4 1,2 1 0,8 0,6 Women Men 0,4 0,2 0 Age 0-12 12-16 16-18 18-20 20-25 25-30 30-40 40-50 50-60 60-65 65-75 >75 Avg Source: RWS/AVV 2005 /MON 2005 12
Average Distance 1km = 0.6 miles Average daily covered distance by gender Daily covered distance 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Women Men 0 Age 0-12 12-16 16-18 18-20 20-25 25-30 30-40 40-50 50-60 60-65 65-75 >75 Avg Source: RWS/AVV 2005 /MON 2005 13
Emotions joy fear anger sadness aversion car bike public transport 14
Safety - Europe 15
Bike Share - EU 30% 27% 25% 20% 19% 15% 10% 10% 9% 9% 8% 7% 5% 5% 5% 2% 0% the Netherlands Denmark Germany Austria Switzerland Belgium Sweden Italy France Great Britain 16
Safety in Numbers 1km = 0.6 miles 2 Bicycle km per person per day 12 1,5 Cyclists killed per 100 million bicycle km 10 8 1 6 0.5 4 2 0 Italy UK Finland Germany Sweden Netherlands 0 17
History 1925 18
Development in Time 1km = 0.6 miles Bicycle km pppy 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 1950 1975: - Suburbanization - Car use - Transport policy - Old fashioned 1975 - present: - Suburbanization - Car use + Transport policy + Clean & Healthy 50 40 30 20 10 Cycle fatalities per billion bicycle km 0 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 Bicycle use Bicycle unsafety 0 19
Benefits of Cycling Sustainability Accessibility Health Liveability Economics 20
Sustainability No CO 2 emission (reduction by 2.4 million tons in the Netherlands) Efficient (1 liter of fossil fuel per 311 miles) Reduction of the global footprint of a country Alleviates global warming 21
Accessibility Consequences in Urban Areas More efficient use of infrastructure Easier access to business areas, etc. Shorter travel times (the bike is the fastest means of transport) Less congestion More efficient parking (8 bicycles for 1 car) 22
Health Cyclists vs. Non-Cyclists Increase of life expectancy by an average of 3 years Extra time in good health (10 years) Reduction of diseases (e.g. obesity, heart and coronary disease, Alzheimer s) More fit and less overweight children Independent and self-confident youth Reduction in healthcare costs Reduction of work absenteeism (10-15%) 23
Lifestyle Cycling offers: More joy and happiness Less traffic noise Cleaner air Better social integration 24
Economic Benefits Reduction in commuting costs More efficient transport Less need to build expensive parking spaces Sustainable economic growth Increased business in shops along bike routes Reduction in work absenteeism (10-15%) Every km by car costs 0.32 ($0.47) Every km by bike gains 0.12 ($0.18) 25
What makes the Dutch cycle? Flexibility Convenience Perceived safety Cost Health benefits The fastest way get around town Easy to combine with other modes of transport 26
Characteristics of Cyclists Muscle power Balance No crumple zones Hardly any suspension Open air Social activity Humans 27
Cycle Speed Design speed of 12.5 to 25 miles per hour Speed limits determined by circumstances 30 km/h-zones (residential areas) Home zones/woonerfs (10 miles/h) 28
Good Infrastructure = More Cyclists 29
Traffic / Road System Function Use Design 30
5 Safety Principles Functionality of roads Homogeneity of mass, speed and direction Recognizability of road design and predictability of road course and road user behaviour Forgivingness of the environment (physical and social) State awareness by the road user 31
3 Road Categories Through roads Distributor roads Access roads 32
Bicycle Traffic On/Along Distributor Roads Access Roads Not on Through Roads 33
Main Requirements for Bicycle Infrastructure 1. Coherence 2. Directness 3. Attractiveness 4. Safety 5. Comfort 34
1. Coherence Consistency Ease of way finding Mobility chain Choice (more than one possible route) 35
2. Directness No unnecessary detours Faster than car Constant speed Minimum delays 36
3. Attractiveness Psychological elements Perception Social safety Side-by-side 37
4. Safety Mix if possible Separate when necessary No hard conflicts Infrastructure Safe vehicles (bicycles and cars) Safe road users 38
5. Comfort Smooth surface Minimum stops Protection against weather Easy way finding Priority at intersections Gentle slopes 39
Bicycle Facilities Network Route Sections Intersections Parking Others 40
Network A mesh/grid width of app. 800ft Urban areas Main destinations are connected No detour Not always dedicated facilities 41
Residential Areas Shortcuts for cyclists 42
Routes: Bike (High)way More important in rural areas and between neighborhoods or towns To encourage longer distance bike commuting Priority at intersections Complete (no missing links) Separation between cyclists and motorists No detours Social safety 43
Street Sections: Bicycle Street Cycle route Car stays behind bicycle Two types: Ü Car in the middle Ü Car on the side More than 2000 bicycles per day Less than 500 pcu/day (two way street) Less than 2000 pcu/day (one way street) 44
Street Sections: Cycle Track Parallel to main road (distributor) " Mostly one direction " 6.50 8.20ft wide (depending on volume) " Car parking on the left Off street path " Two directions " 8.20 13.10ft wide " Depending on volume and mopeds " Centre marking right wrong 45
Intersections Priority Roundabout Traffic lights Raised intersection Tunnel Bridge 46
Roundabouts 4 types: " Bike on street " Bike lane " Separated path with priority " Separated path without priority With path, allow >16.4 feet of space for yielding car 47
Traffic Lights Bicycle phase - all bicycle directions green Advanced stop lane/box Go right to turn left No right turn on red for cars Sometimes free right turn on red for bikes Mirror to avoid turning accidents 48
Tunnels Gradient / grade <5% > 11.5 ft wide > 9 ft headroom Sufficient light Daylight Vision through tunnel right wrong 49
Bridges Gradient/grade <5% Protection against weather 11.5feet wide Cyclists prefer tunnels to bridges 50
Parking Safe facilities Logical location Serviceable Well fitted Sufficient space 51
Other Maintenance Road work zones No cyclist dismount signs No detour more than 50% (max 3miles) 52
Liability and Enforcement Philosophy of Dutch enforcement: Car drivers: should take the responsibility of driving vehicles that could kill should be aware of the capricious nature of cyclists (esp. children) Are always are liable when an accident occurs Cyclists: should stop at red lights should not cycle on side walks 53
Education Start young Safe routes to school 54
Conclusions Cyclist is not a pedestrian with wheels Bicycle facilities need to be tailor-made Handbooks should be for inspiration Cycling is not just a sport Bicycle is not a poor man s Mercedes 55
Cycling is fun for everybody! 56
talens@crow.nl 57