Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Management Lake Name: Colby Survey Type: Population Assessment DOW Number: 699 Survey ID Date: 7// Lake Identification Alternate Lake Name: Partridge (North) Primary Lake Class ID: DNR Sounding Map Number: C566 Alternate Lake Class ID: Lake Location Primary County: St. Louis Nearest Town: Hoyt Lakes Legal Descriptions Lake Center: Township 58N Range W Section 8 PLS Section Lake Center: 588 All Legal Descriptions: St. Louis County: Township 58N Range W Sections, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Area Office Area Name: Region Name: Tower Northeast ORG Code: Region Number: F Lake Access (Information based on Population Assessment dated 7//995) Station ID Ownership Public Use Type Location / Comments Lake Characteristics Lake Area (planimetered acres): 59. GIS Lake Area (acres): 57.7 DOW Lake Area (acres): 5. Littoral Area (acres): 77. Area in MN (acres): 57.7 Maximum Depth (feet):. Mean Depth (feet): (Data excludes records where public use is not designated or is designated "No Public Use") GIS Shoreline (miles): Maximum Fetch (miles): Fetch Orientation (degrees): USGS Quad Map Number:..9 67 Hc USGS Quad K GIS Index: 5 Watershed Characteristics Major Watershed Name: St. Louis River Watershed Number: Watershed size (acres):,8,6 Minor Watershed Name: Partridge R Watershed Number: 9 Watershed size (acres):,5 Lake Survey Report revision: /5/. Data Date: 7// at : pm.
Surveys And Investigations POPULATION ASSESSMENT DATED 7// FOR DOW NUMBER 699 Initial Survey: 8//968. ReSurvey: 7/7/5, 8/9/985. Population Assessment: 7//, 7/5/, 7//995, 8/7/99, 8//989, 8//987, 8/7/979. Fish Diseases And Parasites Species Examined Number of Fish Examined Examination Results Internally Externally In Lab Condition Observed Number of Fish black crappie 9 None observed 9 bluegill 9 None observed 8 Neascus (Black Spot) channel catfish 5 None observed 5 northern pike 7 None observed 8 Neascus (Black Spot) 9 rock bass None observed shorthead redhorse 8 None observed 8 walleye None observed Neascus (Black Spot) white sucker 6 None observed 6 yellow bullhead None observed yellow perch 9 None observed 5 Neascus (Black Spot) Yellow grub Dissolved Oxygen And Temperature Profile Of Lake Water Station ID Sampling Date Bottom Depth (Feet) Sample Depth (Feet) Water Temperature ( F) Dissolved Oxygen (ppm) WQ 7// 9. Surface 76. 6.. 76. 6. 6. 76. 6.5 9. 76. 6.6. 7.9.5. 66.6.5. 65.5.. 6..7 5. 6.9. 6. 6..9 7. 59..5. 55..9 5. 5..6 8. 5.7.5
Field Measurements Of Water Quality POPULATION ASSESSMENT DATED 7// FOR DOW NUMBER 699 Station ID Sampling Date Sample Depth (Feet) Secchi Depth (Feet) Field Alkalinity ph (ppm) Water Color Color Cause WQ 7// Surface. 7.8 Brown Bogstain
Net Catch Summary by Numbers for GN gill net sets POPULATION ASSESSMENT DATED 7// FOR DOW NUMBER 699 Number of Sets: 9 First Set Date: 7// Last Lift Date: 7/5/ Target Species: Abbr Species Quartiles for Lake Class * Total Fish Number Per Set 5% 5% 75% BLC Black Crappie BLG Bluegill 5 CCF Channel Catfish 6 NOP Northern Pike SHR Shorthead Redhorse WAE Walleye WTS White Sucker 9 YEB Yellow Bullhead 6 YEP Yellow Perch..6.5 5.8.56.78...96 5.69..7.9.6..8.75 5...6.8 7.58.67..... 5.67 6.5 Total Fish/Set:.67 * Quartiles for Number Per Set Net Catch Summary by Weight for GN gill net sets Abbr Species Total Weight (Pounds) Pounds Per Set Mean Quartiles for Lake Class * Weight 5% 5% 75% BLC BLG CCF NOP SHR WAE WTS YEB YEP Black Crappie Bluegill Channel Catfish Northern Pike Shorthead Redhorse Walleye White Sucker Yellow Bullhead Yellow Perch.9.6 5.7 5.7.65 7. 5.6.6 9.6.9.7 5.75 5.6.9.8.78......9.65...6.9..58.67.8..9....9..7.6....55...76. Total Pounds Fish/Set: 7. * Quartiles for Mean Weight
Net Catch Summary by Numbers for TN /in mesh, double frame trap net sets POPULATION ASSESSMENT DATED 7// FOR DOW NUMBER 699 Number of Sets: 9 First Set Date: 7// Last Lift Date: 7/5/ Target Species: Abbr Species Quartiles for Lake Class * Total Fish Number Per Set 5% 5% 75% BLC Black Crappie BLG Bluegill 6 BRB Brown Bullhead CCF Channel Catfish 8 HSF Hybrid Sunfish NOP Northern Pike 9 RKB Rock Bass SHR Shorthead Redhorse 8 WTS White Sucker YEB Yellow Bullhead.56.75.5 9.67 6.78. 5. 6...5.75.......67..89.5..8......8.8.6 Total Fish/Set: 7.67 * Quartiles for Number Per Set Net Catch Summary by Weight for TN /in mesh, double frame trap net sets Abbr Species Total Weight (Pounds) Pounds Per Set Mean Quartiles for Lake Class * Weight 5% 5% 75% BLC BLG BRB CCF HSF NOP RKB SHR WTS YEB Black Crappie Bluegill Brown Bullhead Channel Catfish Hybrid Sunfish Northern Pike Rock Bass Shorthead Redhorse White Sucker Yellow Bullhead 8. 7.57.5 7.7.6 9..9 5. 8.7.79.9.8.7 8.9.5.5..7.97....77.6.6.5.9.9.8.95.9...5..55.6.6..7.6.6..79...9..6.6. Total Pounds Fish/Set: 6.5 * Quartiles for Mean Weight 5
Natural Reproduction Catch Summary for TQU /in trap nets POPULATION ASSESSMENT DATED 7// FOR DOW NUMBER 699 Number of Sets: First Set Date: 7/5/ Last Lift Date: 7/6/ Target Species: Abbr Species Age Total Number Number Measured Mean (inches) Range (inches) Minimum Maximum CPUE (num/ set) BLC BLC BLG BRB CSH LMB LMB RKB SHR SPO WTS YEB YEB YEP YEP Black Crappie Black Crappie Bluegill Brown Bullhead Common Shiner Largemouth Bass Largemouth Bass Rock Bass Shorthead Redhorse Spottail Shiner White Sucker Yellow Bullhead Yellow Bullhead Yellow Perch Yellow Perch YOY. > 5.5 All 85 8.5 All. All 9.9 YOY 5.5 > 6.6 All. All. All 7.7 All. YOY. >. YOY 9.9 >. 6
Frequency Distribution For GN POPULATION ASSESSMENT DATED 7// FOR DOW NUMBER 699 gill net sets (Field work conducted between 7// and 7/5/) BLC BLG CCF NOP SHR WAE WTS YEB YEP <...9.5.99..9.5.99 5. 5.9 5.5 5.99 59 6. 6.9 7 6.5 6.99 7. 7.9 8 7.5 7.99 8. 8.9 8.5 8.99 9. 9.9 9.5 9.99..9.5.99..9.5.99..99..99..99 5. 5.99 6. 6.99 7. 7.99 8. 8.99 9. 9.99..99..99..99..99..99 5. 5.99 6. 6.99 7. 7.99 8. 8.99 9. 9.99..99..99..99..99..99 5. 5.99 = > 6. Total Min. Max. Mean # Measured No s for BLC BLG CCF NOP SHR WAE WTS YEB YEP 5. 8.98 7.7 9 6 5.5 6. 5.79 6.5 8.7. 6..68 5. 8.58 8.58 8.58 9..7 7. 9 8.58 9.8.89 8 6 8.7.8.9 6 5..7 5.9 76 5 Note: Unless all fish were measured in the catch, totals shown for some lengthfrequency distributions may differ from the total number of fish in the catch, due to rounding of fractions used in the estimation of length frequency from a subsample of measured fish. 7
Frequency Distribution For TN POPULATION ASSESSMENT DATED 7// FOR DOW NUMBER 699 /in mesh, double frame trap net sets (Field work conducted between 7// and 7/5/) BLC BLG BRB CCF HSF NOP RKB SHR WTS YEB <...9.5.99 7..9 5.5.99 8 5. 5.9 5.5 5.99 8 6. 6.9 6.5 6.99 6 7. 7.9 7.5 7.99 8. 8.9 8.5 8.99 9. 9.9 9.5 9.99..9.5.99..9.5.99..99..99..99 5. 5.99 6. 6.99 7. 7.99 8. 8.99 9. 9.99 5..99 6..99..99..99..99 5. 5.99 6. 6.99 7. 7.99 8. 8.99 9. 9.99..99..99..99..99..99 5. 5.99 = > 6. Total Min. Max. Mean # Measured No s for BLC BLG BRB CCF HSF NOP RKB SHR WTS YEB..8 7. 6.9 7.76 5. 6.6..69 8 5.7.8 9.88 8 7.95 7.95 7.95 9 7.7.68. 9 5.8 5.8 5.8 8 5. 8.5 6.9 8.9.9 7.9.6.5.5 Note: Unless all fish were measured in the catch, totals shown for some lengthfrequency distributions may differ from the total number of fish in the catch, due to rounding of fractions used in the estimation of length frequency from a subsample of measured fish. 8
At Capture With Last Incremental POPULATION ASSESSMENT DATED 7// FOR DOW NUMBER 699 (BodyScale constant, all lengths, and all length increments in inches) Species: Black Crappie BodyScale Constant:.79 Total Sample Size: 5 at Capture in for Each Age Class, with Incremental s for Year Class Age Sampl esize Average At Capture Maximum Minimum Error Increments Increment Error 8....6 7 5.9 5.9 5.9.5 6 6.97 6.97 6.97.8 5 5 7. 8.9 6..6.6.8 6 5 8. 9.7 7.9.5.6.9 7.8.8.8.5 8 8.9 9.7 8.6.5.9.59 Species: Bluegill BodyScale Constant:.79 Total Sample Size: 7 at Capture in for Each Age Class, with Incremental s for Year Class Age Sampl esize Average At Capture Maximum Minimum Error Increments Increment Error 8.85..9.8.. 7.8.5.5.8.89.5 6 8 5.58 7..8.9.58.8 5 5 5 6.67 7.76 5.9.6.. 6 6. 6. 6..8 Species: Northern Pike BodyScale Constant:.9 Total Sample Size: at Capture in for Each Age Class, with Incremental s for Year Class Age Sampl esize Average At Capture Maximum Minimum Error Increments Increment Error 8.77.77.77. 7.88 7.56.5..9. 6 5.57 5.98..88.5. 5 5 6.97 7.6 6.57.9..65 9
POPULATION ASSESSMENT DATED 7// FOR DOW NUMBER 699 At Capture With Last Incremental (Continued) Species: Walleye BodyScale Constant:. Total Sample Size: at Capture in for Each Age Class, with Incremental s for Year Class Age Sampl esize Average At Capture Maximum Minimum Error Increments Increment Error 8 9. 9. 9..6 7 6 5 5 6 8.9 8.9 8.9.69 7 8.7.7.7.78 Species: Yellow Perch BodyScale Constant:.8 Total Sample Size: 9 at Capture in for Each Age Class, with Incremental s for Year Class Age Sampl esize Average At Capture Maximum Minimum Error Increments Increment Error 8 5.9 5.5 5..7.. 7 5.8 6. 5..9.68.5 6 6.5 6.65 5.7.8.66.7 5 5 6.7.7.7.7
POPULATION ASSESSMENT DATED 7// FOR DOW NUMBER 699 BackCalculated s for Each Age Class and Average Annual Increments of BackCalculated s Species: Black Crappie Gear Type: Combined Gear Types (TN) Class Age N 5 6 7 8 8.6.6.78. 7.8.8 6.. 5 5.7.7 6 5.7.7 7.9.9 8.67.67 Mean Mean Increment Total N.7.7 5.7.9.57.5.78.8..7.8.8.68..9.7 5.9. 5..75.8..57.57.75.7.8.6.. Species: Bluegill Gear Type: Combined Gear Types (TN) 6.5.8 5.9. 6..66 6..59 5.8.56 5.69. 6.5. 7..9 7.8. 6.8. 6.7.6 Class Age N 5 6 8.69.69.8.6 7.5.5 6 8.. 5 5 5.5.5 6.9.9 Mean Mean Increment Total N.5.5 7..97.5.8.7.9.6.97.6. 7.9.7.8...9.5.89.96.8 7 5..8 5.5..85.8 5.. 6.7.75 5.6.5 6..7 6 7.7.6 8.69. 7.59.75 7.8.7 8 5.75.9 5.75.9 9.8. 8..7 8.8.86 8.6. 8.6.
POPULATION ASSESSMENT DATED 7// FOR DOW NUMBER 699 BackCalculated s for Each Age Class and Average Annual Increments of BackCalculated s (Continued) Species: Northern Pike Gear Type: Combined Gear Types (GN) Class Age N 5 8.7.7 8.77 7.5 7.76.76 6 5 9.7 9.7 5 5.8.8 Mean Mean Increment Total N.. 6.9 6.8 6. 6.9 5.5.68 6.6 6.5.9.5.6.6 9.8.97.5.8 Species: Walleye Gear Type: Combined Gear Types (GN)..86.5.6.. 7 5.9. 5.9. Class Age N 5 6 7 8 8.. 6.95.9 6 6.5 6.5 8 6.9 6.9 Mean Mean Increment Total N 5.9 5.9 8.99.9.5.96 8.66.7.8.8..8.5. Species: Yellow Perch Gear Type: Combined Gear Types (GN) 5.8.8 6.7.9 5.9.9 6.8.7 9..6 8.7.7 Class Age N 5 6 8.6.6.5.79 7.5.5 6.8.8 6.6.6 Mean Mean Increment Total N.9.9 9.7.9.67.9.7..76.7 9 5...6.96 6..6 5.7.7 6 5..77 8.56.5 6.. 5 9.5.97 9.5.97 8....87 9.7.66..7..7.....96.7.96.7
Age Class Frequency Distribution POPULATION ASSESSMENT DATED 7// FOR DOW NUMBER 699 Species and Number of Fish () Gear () Aged Keyed Unaged Number of Fish in Year Class ('yy) and Age Class ' '9 '8 '7 '6 '5 ' ' ' ' ' '99 '98 '97 '96 <'96 5 6 7 8 9 5+ Black Crappie TN 5 6 7 7 Bluegill TN 7 8 7 Northern Pike GN 5 Walleye GN Yellow Perch GN 9 8 8 7 () Key to sampling gear abbreviations: TN = /in mesh, double frame trap net sets GN = gill net sets () Notes: Number of Fish Aged: Fish that were aged from bony parts. Number of Fish Keyed: Fish assigned an age with an agelength key or by expansion of mesh or station age distributions. Number of Fish Unaged: Fish that were not aged and were not assigned an age.
POPULATION ASSESSMENT DATED 7// FOR DOW NUMBER 699 Survey Crew Notes null Region Signed by user 'jomix' on // Field Notes General Field Tower Area Fisheries IBI Sampling in Because of the uniqueness of the Tower Fisheries area compared to the rest of the state, different sampling methods were developed. Much of the Tower Fisheries Area is in the geological area called Laurentian Shield. This fisheries area has shoreline substrates that are often times dominated by ledge rock and boulders. These rocky shorelines are difficult to traverse by foot when backpack electrofishing and/or seining. The method of choice would then be to use an electrofishing boat and/or.5 inch trap nets. The only drawback in using.5 trap nets is that it becomes more labor intensive when it takes two days in sampling: one day to set the nets and another day to lift the nets and work up the sampled fish. If boat electrofishing was also done a lake, it was done on a different day. The.5 inch trap nets were set with varying lengths of lead depending upon the depth of the water at the sampling site. The main intent was to get the top of the frame of the trap net flush with the water surface. If the substrate in the area of the net was mostly composed rocks of different sizes, there was areas below the lead that were not making contact with the bottom thus allowing small fish to swim under it. If the coordinates assigned to a sampling station brought us to a location that wasn't conducive for setting a net, we would move the sampling station to a better location. In boat electrofishing, we would use the coordinates to navigate to a sampling site. Once we found the sampling site, we would determine a beginning and ending point for the electrofishing run on either side of the sampling site. We would use a meter rope to lay out the electrofishing run. We would go to the beginning point and typically tie the rope to an overhanging branch. Next, we would fish out the rope to an ending point for the run. Colby Lake: There were IBI sampling sites established. Only.5 inch trap nets were used to sample fish. Discussion Colby Lake is a 5acre lake with a maximum depth of feet located near Hoyt Lakes in eastern St. Louis County. Colby Lake, along with 8 other lakes in northeast Minnesota, is in lake class. Typically, lakes in this class are small in size (mean = 6 acres), moderately deep (mean = feet) with high percentage of littoral area (mean = 6%). Colby Lake is a flowage lake on the Partridge River. The lake is used as a water source for the Laskin coal powered electrical plant owned by Minnesota Power. There is a fish screen on the water intake in the main part of the lake. There is a Minnesota Department of Health consumption advisory for fish in Colby Lake due to high levels of mercury. Colby Lake is primarily managed for walleye, bluegill, and black crappie, and secondarily for northern pike. Colby Lake, along with nine other Tower Fisheries area lakes, was selected for fish index of biotic integrity (IBI) sampling. This index is designed to help determine the overall health of the biological community of the lake. For Colby Lake, IBI sampling was done using.5 inch trap nets at sampling locations. Twelve different game and nongame species were identified. Species typically found in a lake class fish community assemblage were found in Colby Lake, with one exception. Channel catfish, abundant in Colby Lake, is a unique species for class lakes. By weight, channel catfish contributed the most making up almost 5% of pounds sampled in trap nets and % of the pounds sampled in gill nets. Catfish ranged in length from.5 to 8. inches with a mean of. inches. Catfish gillnet CPUE of.8 was above the historical range (. to.). For trap nets, catfish CPUE prior to the last two assessments was only.. The mean for 5 and assessments was.8. Channel catfish do not have an established quartile range for either gill net or trap net in lake class. This important species to the Colby Lake fish community does not have any established long range management goals. Northern pike was second behind channel catfish in terms of contribution to the gillnet catch (.7% by weight). In
POPULATION ASSESSMENT DATED 7// FOR DOW NUMBER 699 Discussion (Continued), northern pike GN CPUE of. was comparable to the historical median (.5) but down from the 5 findings of 5.. The next highest GN CPUE for pike was.9 in 989. The pike GN CPUE was comparable to the 5th percentile value (.) for lake class. The 6 pike sampled ranged in length from. inches to.7 inches with a mean of 5. inches. This was the highest mean length of any assessment conducted on Colby. Four year classes were identified with the 6 year class (age ) comprising % of the aged sample. Growth was slightly above average. By the development of the third annulus, a Colby Lake pike was.5 inches long compared to the Tower area lake class mean value of 9.5 inches (n=; SE=.). Bluegill TN CPUE for the first seven investigations on Colby Lake (968995) averaged.6/trap net which is comparable to the median value (5.) for lake class. All of these earlier investigations were conducted in late August or early September when bluegill are less likely to be caught in trap nets. In, 5, and, trap netting was moved to July, and TN CPUEs, with the exception of (6.8), had increased to values greater than the 75th percentile value (6.). In, bluegill sampled ranged in length from. to 7.8 with a mean of 5. inches. The 5 (age 5) and 6 (age ) year classes combined made up 7% of the aged sample. atcapture for 5 year class was 6.7 inches. The long range goal for bluegill of a mean length of 7. inches was not attained. However, the long range goal for TN CPUE of 6. was attained. In, black crappie TN CPUE of.6 was higher than the historical median (.9) but lower than 5 findings (8.9) which was the highest ever recorded. Crappie captured ranged in length from. inches to. inches with a mean of 7. inches. The mean length was typical of past findings where it seldom exceeded 8 inches. Anecdotal information from local anglers indicates that there is heavy angling pressure on black crappie. This pressure may be limiting crappie from attaining larger size. Growth for Colby crappie is below average. At the development of the third annulus, Colby crappie were. inches long compared to the Tower area lake class mean value of 6.6 inches (n=66; SE=.). IBI sampling captured YOY black crappie. In the past, walleye abundance has been highly variable in Colby Lake, ranging from.7/gill net to 5./gill net with a mean of.6/gill net. In, walleye GN CPUE of./gill net was the lowest recorded and below the 5th percentile value (.8) for lake class. Colby Lake has a long and varied history of walleye stocking with limited success. Both fry and fingerling stocking has been attempted. A variety of walleye stocking regimes from 958 to 99 resulted in a median walleye catch of.7/gill net. Stocked year classes were generally no stronger than nonstocked year classes. In, yellow perch abundance of./gill net fell between the median and 75th percentile values. Perch ranged in length from. to.5 inches with only one perch greater than eight inches. Natural reproduction check using.5 inch trap nets captured 9 YOY perch suggesting good recruitment. 5
POPULATION ASSESSMENT DATED 7// FOR DOW NUMBER 699 Status Of The Fishery Colby Lake is a 5acre lake with a maximum depth of feet located at Hoyt Lakes in eastern St. Louis County. Based on physical and chemical characteristics, Colby, along with 8 other northeastern Minnesota lakes, is categorized in lake class. Typically, lakes in this class are small in size (mean = 6 acres), moderately deep (mean = feet) and have a high percentage of littoral area (mean = 6%). The lake is used as a water source for the Laskin coal powered electrical plant owned by Minnesota Power. There is a fish screen on the water intake in the main part of the lake preventing fish from entering the plant. There is a Minnesota Department of Health consumption advisory for fish In Colby Lake due to higher levels of mercury. Go to the www.mndnr.gov website and Lakefinder to view guidelines for consumption of fish on Colby Lake. Channel catfish, by weight, were the most abundant fish sampled in. Catfish sampled ranged in length from.5 to 8. inches with an average of. inches. Catfish are not normally sampled in lake class. There is a lowdensity, qualitysized population of northern pike in Colby Lake. In, pike sampled ranged in length from. inches to.7 inches with an average of 5. inches. This was the highest average length of any assessment conducted on Colby Lake. Because there are few pike in the lake, anglers should practice selective harvest. Keep the small pike for eating, but release the bigger mature spawners. This practice will help maintain a quality size structure and protect spawning pike. Panfish species present in Colby include bluegill, black crappie, and yellow perch. Bluegill up to 8 inches and crappie up to inches in length were sampled in. Walleye abundance in Colby Lake has been highly variable. Colby Lake has a long and varied history of walleye stocking with limited success. Both fry and fingerling stocking has been attempted, but stocked year classes were generally no stronger than nonstocked year classes. For this reason, stocking was discontinued. 6
Approval Dates And Notices POPULATION ASSESSMENT DATED 7// FOR DOW NUMBER 699 Date Approved By Tower Area Fisheries Supervisor: Date Approved By Northeast Region Fisheries Manager: // // Copyright, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources By accepting the data in this report, the user agrees the data will be used for personal benefit and not for profit. Any other uses or publication of the data needs the consent of the Department. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on the data. Lake Survey Report revision: /5/RJE. Data Date: 7// at : pm. 7