The Importance of Radio-collared Bears

Similar documents
COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report for Grizzly Bear Western population (Ursus arctos) in Canada SUMMARY

DMU 056 Midland County Deer Management Unit

Keywords: 7SI/Brown bear/harvest/harvest quota/hunting/malme/management/ mortality/population size/trend/ursus arctos

Deer Management Unit 249

021 Deer Management Unit

Minnesota s Wild Turkey Harvest 2016

Deer Management Unit 255

STATUS OF MINNESOTA BLACK BEARS, 2012

DMU 043 Lake County Deer Management Unit

Deer Management Unit 122

Deer Management Unit 127

DMU 065 Ogemaw County Deer Management Unit

STATUS OF MINNESOTA BLACK BEARS, 2013, 2012

DMU 040 Kalkaska County Deer Management Unit

Minnesota s Wild Turkey Harvest 2015

DMU 361 Fremont Deer Management Unit Newaygo, Oceana, N. Muskegon Counties

Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group

STATUS OF MINNESOTA BLACK BEARS, 2016, 2012

STATUS OF MINNESOTA BLACK BEARS, 2017, 2012

5/DMU 069 Otsego County Deer Management Unit

Annual Report Ecology and management of feral hogs on Fort Benning, Georgia.

Report of Raccoon Dog management in Finland for 2014

Deer Management Unit 252

DMU 006 Arenac County Deer Management Unit

Mitigating Vehicle Collisions with Large Wildlife

DMU 046 Lenawee County Deer Management Unit

DMU 057 Missaukee County Deer Management Unit

DMU 038 Jackson County

Spring 2012 Wild Turkey Harvest Report

Life history Food Distribution Management... 98

Mule deer in the Boundary Region: Proposed research and discussion

White-Tailed Deer Management FAQ

The ruffed grouse population cycle. defying the best attempts of wildlife biologists to understand it. rn y grou.<c trnil rum fo< mib on public lmd,

Deer Management Unit 152

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

IN PROGRESS BIG GAME HARVEST REPORTS FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH Energy and Resource Development

DMU 045 Leelanau County Deer Management Unit

DMU 419 Clinton, Eaton, Ingham, Ionia, and Shiawassee Counties

Report to the Joint Standing Committee on Inland Fisheries and Wildlife

Deer Management Unit 349

Mule and Black-tailed Deer

Cabinet-Yaak / Selkirk Mountains 2016 Grizzly Bear Monitoring

Consideration for Moose Management in Ontario Northern Ontario First Nations Environmental Conference

DMU 053 Mason County Deer Management Unit

DMU 008 Barry County Deer Management Unit

Saint John's Abbey Arboretum Controlled Deer Hunt 2013

FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

Deer-Elk Ecology Research Project

Recommendations for Pennsylvania's Deer Management Program and The 2010 Deer Hunting Season

Findings of the Alaska Board of Game BOG

DMU 072 Roscommon County Deer Management Unit

The 2009 Montana Wolf Hunting Season

DMU 047 Livingston County Deer Management Unit

DMU 452 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit

2015 Florida Black Bear Hunt Summary Report

Early History, Prehistory

2014 Winnebago System Walleye Report

THIEF LAKE WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA NEWSLETTER

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

Modeling Population Decline

DMU 005 Antrim County Deer Management Unit

DMU 073 Saginaw County Deer Management Unit

Monitoring Population Trends of White-tailed Deer in Minnesota Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group

By Kip Adams, Deer Project Leader, New Hampshire Fish and Game Department and Darrell Covell, UNH Wildlife Extension Specialist

Lesson: Forest Friends

DMU 024 Emmet County Deer Management Unit

REBOUND. on the. It was the winter of 2000/2001, and it seemed like the snow

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

2009 Update. Introduction

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Saint John's Abbey Arboretum Controlled Deer Hunt 2017 Welcome to Saint John s for the 16th controlled deer hunt since 1933.

Carrying Capacity Activity. 5 th Grade PSI. Teacher s Notes Procedure: Simulation 1 Regular herds

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS. Court File No. A Petitioners, Respondents.

Implementing a Successful Deer Management Program. Kip Adams Certified Wildlife Biologist Dir. of Ed. & Outreach Quality Deer Management Association

Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Long history in ecology

Wildlife Introduction

Fun Facts History of the Pig Distribution Management Wild Pig Biology Fort Benning Regulations How to Hunt Wild Pigs?

Michigan Predator-Prey Project Phase 1 Preliminary Results and Management Recommendations. Study Background

March 18, 2010 (801) Shed Antler Gatherers and Deer on the Henrys

Maryland Department of Natural Resources Wildlife and Heritage Service

AN INCIDENTAL TAKE PLAN FOR CANADA LYNX AND MINNESOTA S TRAPPING PROGRAM

Beausoleil First Nation Eleven O-Gemaa Miikaan Christian Island, ON L9M 0A Fax:

CHARLES H. WILLEY PHOTO. 8 November/December 2006 WILDLIFE JOURNAL

Map Showing NAFO Management Units

Questionnaire for Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge Interviews on Boreal Caribou LONG VERSION

Deer Management in Maryland. Brian Eyler Deer Project Leader Maryland DNR

Status and management of large carnivores in. Estonia. Peep Männil Nature Department Estonian Environment Agency. Photo: Toomas Tuul

RANCHING Wildlife. Texas White-Tailed Deer 2017 Hunting Forecast

Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

DMU 487 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit

WRITTEN BY KATHERINE PYLES

Mammal Only flying mammal Small. Nocturnal Live in caves Eat insects and fruit Live in caves. wildirdarden.inc.

2009 BIG GAME AND FURBEARER HARVEST RECORD FOR THE FOND DU LAC RESERVATION AND CEDED TERRITORIES

Report of Raccoon Dog management in Finland for 2018

Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

2007 BIG GAME AND FURBEARER HARVEST RECORD FOR THE FOND DU LAC RESERVATION AND CEDED TERRITORIES

DMU 082 Wayne County Deer Management Unit

CHECKS AND BALANCES. OVERVIEW Students become managers of a herd of animals in a paper-pencil, discussionbased

TRINITY COUNTY. Board Item Request Form Phone

Transcription:

The Importance of Radio-collared Bears (and why we ask hunters not to shoot them) Dave Garshelis, Bear Research Scientist, Minnesota DNR Bear management in Minnesota is based on multiple sources of information: statistics from the bear hunt, assessment of natural food conditions, a population model based on the ages of harvested bears (obtained from teeth submitted by hunters), and results of a long-term, active bear research program. Minnesota is lucky to have one of the longest, DNR-run bear research programs in the country. The core of this research program is radio-collared bears. Because long-term research on individual collared bears is so crucial to management, we ask hunters not to shoot collared bears. Radio-collars are not easy to see, but all bears with a collar also have large, colorful ear tags. Look for the ear tags, not the collar. Most collars now have sophisticated GPS units, and most collared bears also have a small heart monitor implanted under the skin near the heart.

Research Began in Early Days of Minnesota s Bear Management 1971: Bear classified as big game species: bear or deer license required to hunt. 1978: Bear harvest exceeds 1,000. 1979: Bears could only be taken during designated bear season (no longer during firearms deer season). 1981: Bears could only be hunted with a bear license. Start of DNR research project with radio-collared bears 1982: Start of lottery-based quota on bear licenses. 1987: Establishment of no-quota zone along fringe of range. Multiple Study Sites for Better Information Bears in Minnesota occupy the northern, mainly forested part of the state. We have studied bears with radio-collars at multiple sites within this range in order to gain an understanding of how differences in habitat and human factors drive mortality, reproduction, movements, and ecology of bears. Work is still continuing in 4 of the 5 study sites: 1981 present: In and around Chippewa National Forest (CNF), north of Grand Rapids 1991 93: Pine County no-quota area 1991 present: Camp Ripley Military Reserve 1997 present: Voyageurs National Park (VNP) 2007 present: Northwestern Minnesota (NW)

Research Findings Important to Management Hunting is the main cause of mortality in all areas About ¾ of Minnesota bears that survive their cub year eventually die from legal hunting. Bears are not hunted in Camp Ripley and Voyageurs National Park (VNP), and since the start of our study in NW Minnesota, hunters were asked not to shoot collared bears with large eartags. Despite these restrictions, legal hunting has been the dominant source of mortality for bears in all areas. 4% 4% 7% 4% 22% 81% 70% 6% 9% 31% 11% 11% 11% 6% 44% 67% The heaviest hunting pressure among our study sites has been in and around the Chippewa National Forest (CNF), where abundant public land and easy access via numerous forest roads provide opportunities for hunters; in this area, over 80% of bears die due to hunting. Bears in Camp Ripley and VNP are hunted when they leave the reserve or park boundaries during excursions to find better food in fall, and are drawn to hunters baits. Shot by hunter Shot as nuisance Vehicle collision Other human-caused death Natural mortality Died from unknown causes

% Producing litter by age 4 Reproduction is highest along the edges of the range Normally one might think that the core of the bear range would have the highest reproductive rates. But for bears in Minnesota, the edges of the range provide more food. There are more oaks along the southern fringe of the range. The northwestern part of the range has many small blocks of forest with a lot of light penetration along the forest edges this enhances fruit and nut production. And bears also benefit from feeding in cornfields, which are rare in the core of the range. 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Surviving litters only n=14 n=7 n=61 n=11 VNP CNF Camp Ripley NW Bears that get more food grow faster, and mature earlier. 85% of bears living along the periphery of the range had their first cubs by 4 years old (some produced at 3 years old). By contrast, none of the collared bears that we studied in Voyageurs National Park (VNP) produced cubs by age 4, and less than half did so in the Chippewa National Forest Litter size is less affected by nutrition: litters of 3 cubs are the most common (55%) across the state, but 2-cub litters were more common than 3-cub litters in Voyageurs National Park. About 5% of litters are a single cub (mainly a bear s first litter), and about 5% are litters of 4 or 5 cubs.

Movements to fall feeding areas are extensive Although we manage bears in separate Bear Management Units (BMUs), each with a separate hunting license quota (or no quota), many bears range widely across the boundaries of these units. These movements are especially extensive in the fall. Most bears that move in the fall seem to know places where food is better (often moving southward). We have evidence that even if they have never been to a feeding place before, they follow scent trails of other bears. Long-range movements of 50 miles or more are more common among Minnesota s black bears than elsewhere in the U.S. We can now track the exact travel route with the GPS collars, which collect a location every 2 hours and download the data to us by satellite daily. After feeding in an area for several weeks, bears often return following the same path, and den within their summer home range. These common movements across the boundaries of BMUs, which vary in extent, duration, and distance depending on food conditions, make it virtually impossible to obtain meaningful BMU-specific population estimates.

Bear Number Collars, cameras, and heart monitors yield fascinating information about denning Bears in Minnesota spend about half the year in winter dens. During their long hibernation, they survive totally on fat accumulated in the fall which explains their fall feeding frenzy. We have not witnessed bears that died over winter of insufficient fat, but sometimes young, very skinny bears die in early spring, shortly after emerging from their den, before spring green-up. 30 29 First out of den Left site 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 19-Feb 1-Mar 11-Mar 21-Mar 31-Mar 10-Apr 20-Apr 30-Apr Modern technology (GPS collars, trail cameras, and heart monitors) enables us to know when bears enter dens, when they start hibernating, when they start waking up, when they emerge from the den for the first time, when they leave the den site, and how far away they go when they do leave.

Remote cameras placed outside the dens of collared bears also show what bears do when they first emerge. Often, after first emerging they spend several weeks in the vicinity of the den site, going in and out of the den, before departing. During this period, they warm their bodies, increase their heart rate, rehydrate (often eating snow) from 6 months without water, and cubs gain strength and mobility. But also, they commonly rake in fresh bedding material: with earlier springs, dens get wet, and insulation from water in the den is critical.. Wet dens are not only uncomfortable, but obviously a drain on energy, and for some bears, a threat to survival. Bottom right photo above shows a wet mother removing a dead cub from the underground den; her 3 other cubs survived because she was able to build a nest for them outside the den.

Data obtained over almost 4 decades of research indicate that cub survival is high in Minnesota: about 80% of cubs make it to den with their mother when they are 1 year old (yearlings). But increasingly we are seeing bears, including mothers with cubs or yearlings, using above-ground nests instead of underground dens, since underground dens are now more prone to flooding from early spring thaws. Long-term monitoring of individual collared bears is essential for understanding new trends in bear behavior and corresponding survival.