Spring 2012 Wild Turkey Harvest Report

Similar documents
Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group

Minnesota s Wild Turkey Harvest 2016

Minnesota s Wild Turkey Harvest 2015

Fall Wild Turkey Population Survey, 2010

HUNTING HARVEST STATISTICS. Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN (651)

2018 MINNESOTA PRAIRIE-CHICKEN HARVEST SURVEY

Monitoring Population Trends of White-tailed Deer in Minnesota Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group

Hunter and Angler Expenditures, Characteristics, and Economic Effects, North Dakota,

Hunting License Information

DMU 005 Antrim County Deer Management Unit

Deer Management Unit 249

5/DMU 069 Otsego County Deer Management Unit

Status and Distribution of the Bobcat (Lynx rufus) in Illinois

DMU 006 Arenac County Deer Management Unit

Recommendations for Future Wild Turkey Hunting Management

DMU 361 Fremont Deer Management Unit Newaygo, Oceana, N. Muskegon Counties

DMU 072 Roscommon County Deer Management Unit

DMU 065 Ogemaw County Deer Management Unit

DMU 056 Midland County Deer Management Unit

2007 BIG GAME AND FURBEARER HARVEST RECORD FOR THE FOND DU LAC RESERVATION AND CEDED TERRITORIES

NORTH DAKOTA STATE REPORT June 2016

DMU 024 Emmet County Deer Management Unit

Minnesota s Wild Turkey Harvest Fall 2016, Spring 2017

021 Deer Management Unit

ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME STAFF COMMENTS INTERIOR REGION REGULATORY PROPOSALS ALASKA BOARD OF GAME MEETING FAIRBANKS, ALASKA FEBRUARY

DMU 053 Mason County Deer Management Unit

Deer Management Unit 349

Deer Management Unit 122

IN PROGRESS BIG GAME HARVEST REPORTS FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH Energy and Resource Development

Report Field Description Values

DMU 057 Missaukee County Deer Management Unit

STATUS OF MINNESOTA BLACK BEARS, 2012

2012 Pickering Commission on Hunting Laws, Rules, and Publications - Recommendations Final Draft November 8, 2011 Prepared by George Smith

DMU 043 Lake County Deer Management Unit

Deer Hunting Frequently Asked Questions 2017 Deer Hunting Rules September 22, 2017

2019 JAVELINA OVER-THE COUNTER NONPERMIT-TAG INFORMATIONAL HANDOUT

Angling in Manitoba (2000)

2018 WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Deer Management Unit 152

Big Game Allocation Policy Sub-Committee Recommendations to AGPAC

FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Predator and Furbearer Management. SPECIES: Predatory and Furbearing Mammals

2009 BIG GAME AND FURBEARER HARVEST RECORD FOR THE FOND DU LAC RESERVATION AND CEDED TERRITORIES

FISH COMMUNITIES AND FISHERIES OF THE THOUSAND ISLANDS AND MIDDLE CORRIDOR

Kansas Deer Report Seasons

STATUS OF WILDLIFE POPULATIONS, FALL 2008

NEW YORK STATE CONSERVATION COUNCIL, INC Resolutions. Crossbows

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

BIG GAME SEASON STRUCTURE

DMU 045 Leelanau County Deer Management Unit

Early History, Prehistory

NORTH DAKOTA STATE REPORT June 2018

DMU 008 Barry County Deer Management Unit

PROPOSED RULEMAKING GAME COMMISSION

Cariboo-Chilcotin (Region 5) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

2010 BIG GAME AND FURBEARER HARVEST RECORD FOR THE FOND DU LAC RESERVATION AND CEDED TERRITORIES

Deer Management Unit 252

Deer Management Unit 255

Weekly Shout Out. Compliments of the Hunter Education Program. Accommodating Hunter Safety Students

State Regulation of Sunday Hunting Washington New Hampshire Montana North Dakota Minnesota Vermont Maine Oregon Massachusetts Idaho South Dakota Wisco

The Importance of Radio-collared Bears

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. Sand Plain Big Woods Goal Block

Introduction to Pennsylvania s Deer Management Program. Christopher S. Rosenberry Deer and Elk Section Bureau of Wildlife Management

Teton County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, For the Wyoming Wildlife Federation. David T. Taylor & Thomas Foulke

2017 DEER HUNTING FORECAST

DEER MANAGEMENT HUNTING PERMIT TERMS & CONDITIONS

NORTH DAKOTA STATE REPORT May 25, 2011

Splitting seasons into multiple, shorter ones is preferable to long, crowded seasons.

ALBERTA FISH & GAME ASSOCIATION 2015 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING PASSED RESOLUTIONS FEBRUARY 21, 2015

HOUSE REPUBLICAN STAFF ANALYSIS

IC Chapter 12. License Fees and Sales

2018 MN DNR and NWTF Learn to Hunt Youth / Adult / Family Turkey Hunt April 21 and 22, 2018

Deer Management in Maryland -Overview. Brian Eyler Deer Project Leader

DMU 038 Jackson County

TRAPPING HARVEST STATISTICS. Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN (651)

TRAPPING HARVEST STATISTICS. Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN (651)

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2012 Session

The North American Waterfowl Management Plan: Incorporating the New Goal

DMU 040 Kalkaska County Deer Management Unit

STATUS OF MINNESOTA BLACK BEARS, 2013, 2012

Enclosed, please find the 2018 Spotlight Deer Survey Report and Recommendations that we have prepared for your review and records.

The Lodge The main lodge is available to accommodate 11 people comfortably. It has four bedrooms with two queen size beds in each room. Plus three, ei

Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

Saskatchewan Resident Big Game Draw Overview

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

DMU 073 Saginaw County Deer Management Unit

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ON RESIDENT CANADA GOOSE MANAGEMENT Questions and Answers

Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

New Hampshire Fish and Game Department 2018 NEW HAMPSHIRE MOOSE HUNT *

Deer Harvest Characteristics During Compound and Traditional Archery Hunts

Angling in Manitoba Survey of Recreational Angling

DEER HUNTER 2016 GAME GUIDE UNOFFICIAL

2010 Zone 3 Deer Season Recommendations

IC Chapter 12. License Fees and Sales

The Role and Economic Importance of Private Lands in Providing Habitat for Wyoming s Big Game

White-tailed deer hunting on Fort Campbell

Deer Management Unit 127

NEWS RELEASE. Harvest allocation ensures certainty for hunting sector

SPOTLIGHT DEER SURVEY YO RANCHLANDS LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION ±10,400 ACRES KERR COUNTY

TOWN OF BURLINGTON HUNTING POLICY 2013 ARCHERY SEASON FOR DEER IN THE LANDLOCKED FOREST

Transcription:

Spring 2012 Wild Turkey Harvest Report Eric Walberg and Marrett Grund Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Madelia, Minnesota July 26, 2012 In Minnesota, the spring wild turkey hunting season is designed to regulate harvest and distribute hunting pressure by allocating permits across 12 permit areas (PAs, Figure 1) and 8 time periods using a quota system. Although youth hunters could purchase a permit over-thecounter, adult hunters interested in pursuing wild turkeys were required to apply for a permit through a lottery system. Preference for this lottery system was determined by the number of years a valid but unsuccessful application has been submitted since last receiving a permit. Hunters could apply individually or in a group of up to 4 hunters. Successful applicants were notified through U.S. mail, and unsuccessful applicants were awarded a preference point. The goal of this system was to provide quality turkey hunting opportunities by minimizing hunter interference rates, conservatively harvesting turkeys in permit areas where the turkey range was expanding, yet allowing a substantial harvest in the remainder of the state. There were two notable regulation changes for the 2012 spring hunting season: the last 4 time periods (E, F, G and H) had an unlimited number of permits available and the number of PAs was reduced from 81 to 12 PAs by pooling smaller PAs into larger ones. Permits for time periods E through H and all surplus licenses remaining after the drawing were offered over-thecounter in mid-march on a first-come, first-served basis. Seven types of hunting licenses were available to resident turkey hunters: (1) general lottery permit in which an applicant or a group of up to 4 hunters applied for a specific PA and time period; (2) landowner permit in which up to 20% of permits for each PA and time period were reserved for landowners or tenants who lived on 40 acres or more of land within the PA; (3) youth permit for residents age 17 or less on opening day of the turkey hunting season; (4) archery permit which could be purchased for the last 4 time periods; (5) youth archery; (6) surplus permits; and (7) military permit. Five types of hunting licenses were available to nonresident turkey hunters: (1) general lottery permit; (2) youth permit; (3) archery permit; (4) youth archery permit; and (5) surplus permit. During 2012, 42,817 permits were issued (Table 1, Figure 2), including 17,944 general lottery permits, 1,346 landowner permits, 8,664 youth permits, 3,911 archery permits, and 10,952 surplus permits. There were 187 permits issued for the Camp Ripley disabled veterans hunt. Hunters registered 11,325 turkeys, an increase of 13% from 2011 (Table 1, Figure 2). Hunter success averaged 29% (Table 1), which was comparable to the 5-year average of 30%. Hunter success by PA ranged from 15% (PA 511) to 45% (PA 509; Table 2). Hunter success varied by license type from 13% (archery) to 32% (general lottery and landowner), 24% (youth), and 23% (surplus). The number of general lottery licenses (including landowner) issued averaged 4,818 permits in time periods A D, whereas the number of surplus licenses issued averaged 209 permits over the same time periods (Table 3). The average number of surplus licenses issued in the last four time periods increased to an average of 2,530 surplus permits

because there were an unlimited number of surplus permits available and no general lottery permit quota was offered. The number of youth permits issued averaged 1,872 permits in time periods A D and the average number of permits issued in the last four time periods declined to 285 youth permits (Table 3), which indicates youth hunters took advantage of hunting turkeys earlier in the spring. The 8,940 permits issued to resident and non-resident youth hunters (general lottery, surplus, and archery) in 2012 was a 3% increase over the 8,693 youth permits issued in 2011. Approximately 18% (2,380) of harvested turkeys were registered using the phone registration system, 30% (4,002) through the internet, and 52% (4,943) at a registration station. Numeric changes in annual turkey harvests can be influenced by turkey population size, hunter effort, and weather. As of 2010, Minnesota s wild turkey population appeared to be stable or growing modestly throughout most of the range, with more rapid growth in the northern PAs (Giudice et al. 2011). The effect of the mild winter of 2011-12 on turkey abundance is unknown, but survival rates may have been above average due to above average temperatures and below average precipitation (Minnesota Climatology Working Group 2012). Weather conditions in April and May were relatively warm and wet across much of Minnesota, with above average temperatures and above average precipitation (Minnesota Climatology Working Group 2012). Precipitation during the 2012 spring turkey harvest was similar to the last two spring turkey harvests for the month of April, but more precipitation occurred in May (Minnesota Climatology Working Group 2012). Although hunting opportunities increased in 2012 due to a larger portion of Minnesota being open for turkey harvest and an unlimited number of permits available for time periods E through H, hunter effort was reduced, with over 4,600 fewer permits issued in 2012 than in 2011. Fewer permits issued from 2011 to 2012 may have been caused, at least in part, by time periods E and F switching to unlimited permit availability and the poor weather that occurred during the month of May. The increase in success rate that occurred from 2011 to 2012 was likely a function of above average temperature during the 2012 spring turkey hunting season, which likely increased hunter effort for those hunters who participated. Improved weather conditions increased the spring 2012 turkey harvest in Wisconsin, Iowa, and South Dakota from 2011 as well. Consequently, the increased harvest in 2012 was likely the result of warmer weather and possibly increased turkey abundance due to increased winter survival rates compared to 2011. Literature Cited Giudice, J., M. Tranel, and K. Haroldson. 2011. Fall Wild Turkey Population Survey, 2010. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul, MN, Agency Report. Minnesota Climatology Working Group. 2012. Climate journal. http://climate.umn.edu/ Accessed 20 June 2012.

Table 1. Permits available, permits issued, and registered harvest from 1978 2012 for all spring wild turkey hunting seasons in Minnesota. Permits Year Available Issued Issued (%) Registered harvest Success (%) a 1978 420 411 97.9 94 22.9 1979 840 827 98.5 116 14.0 1980 1,200 1,191 99.3 98 8.2 1981 1,500 1,437 95.8 113 7.9 1982 2,000 1,992 99.6 106 5.3 1983 2,100 2,079 99.0 116 5.6 1984 3,000 2,837 94.6 178 6.3 1985 2,750 2,449 89.1 323 13.2 1986 2,500 2,251 90.0 333 14.8 1987 2,700 2,520 93.3 520 20.6 1988 3,000 2,994 99.8 674 22.5 1989 4,000 3,821 95.5 930 24.3 1990 6,600 6,126 92.8 1,709 27.9 1991 9,170 8,607 93.9 1,724 20.0 1992 9,310 9,051 97.2 1,691 18.7 1993 9,625 9,265 96.3 2,082 22.5 1994 9,940 9,479 95.4 1,975 20.8 1995 9,975 9,550 95.7 2,339 24.5 1996 12,131 10,983 90.5 2,841 25.9 1997 12,530 11,610 92.7 3,302 28.4 1998 14,035 13,229 94.3 4,361 33.0 1999 18,360 16,387 89.3 5,132 31.3 2000 20,160 18,661 92.6 6,154 33.0 2001 22,936 21,404 93.3 6,383 29.8 2002 24,136 22,607 93.7 6,516 28.8 2003 25,016 22,770 91.0 7,666 33.7 2004 27,600 25,261 91.5 8,434 33.4 2005 31,748 27,638 87.1 7,800 28.2 2006 32,624 27,876 85.4 8,241 29.6 2007 b 33,976 28,320 83.4 9,412 33.2 2008 b 37,992 31,942 84.1 10,994 34.4 2009 b 42,328 36,193 85.5 12,210 33.7 2010 b 55,982 46,548 c 83.0 13,467 29.0 2011 b Unlimited 43,521 c N/A 10,055 23.1 2012 b Unlimited 38,906 c N/A 11,325 29.1 a Success rates not adjusted for non-participation b Youth hunt data included c Permits issued to archery hunters were not included in this Table. There were 2,462 permits issued to archers in 2011 and 3,911 permits issued to archers in 2012.

Table 2. Permits issued, registered harvest, and hunter success during the 2012 Minnesota spring wild turkey season. Permit Area Permits Issued a Harvest b Success (%) c 501 9,943 2741 28 502 857 181 21 503 4,645 1499 32 504 958 291 30 505 3,627 1019 28 506 1,438 401 28 507 9,522 2883 30 508 4,021 1156 29 509 244 111 45 510 3,262 957 29 511 154 23 15 512 48 17 35 a Permits issued for the Camp Ripley disabled veterans hunt (187) and archery permits (3,911) were not included in this Table. b There were 45 turkeys registered from the Camp Ripley disabled veterans hunt and were not included in this Table. c Success rates were not adjusted for non-participation.

Table 3. Permits available and issued by license type (resident and non-resident) and time period for the spring 2012 wild turkey season, Minnesota. Permits issued Time period a Permits available General lottery Landowner Surplus Youth c A 5,705 4,410 675 17 3,705 B 5,705 4,587 293 93 460 C 5,705 4,656 273 93 2,184 D 5,705 4,272 105 631 1,137 E Unlimited 9 0 5,202 376 F Unlimited 4 0 1,296 146 G Unlimited 2 0 2,632 399 H Unlimited 4 0 988 220 Total b Unlimited 17,944 1,346 10,952 8,664 a A = April 18-22, B = April 23-27, C = April 28 May 2, D = May 3-7, E = May 8-12, F = May 13-17, G = May 18-24, H = May 25-31 b Total includes 187 issued for the Camp Ripley disabled veterans hunt (4 general lottery and 183 surplus), but excludes archery permit sales. c Total excludes 276 youth archery licenses.

Figure 1. Permit areas open for hunting during the 2012 spring turkey hunting season, Minnesota.

70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 Applicants Issued Registered Harvest Figure 2. Applicants, permits issued, and registered harvest for the spring wild turkey seasons 1978-2012, Minnesota. Number of permits issued does not include archery permits in 2010-212.