California s North Coast Fishing Communities Historical Perspective and Recent Trends

Similar documents
Socioeconomic Profile and Spatial Analysis of Fisheries in the three central California National Marine Sanctuaries

WEST COAST FISHERIES AND MANAGEMENT

Appendix G Coastal Demographic and Economic Trends Additional Figures

Socioeconomic Profile of Fisheries in the Cordell Bank and Gulf of the Farallones NMSs

Report to the Monterey County Office of Economic Development. Caroline Pomeroy, Ph.D. 1. and. Michael Dalton, Ph.D. 2. June 2003

OR DUNGENESS CRAB FISHERY:

City of Ketchikan and Other Places Within the Ketchikan Gateway Borough:

Ketchikan and Other Nearby Places:

Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series ONMS-14-02

Commercial Fisheries in the South Coast s Marine Protected Areas

Oregon Commercial Fishing Industry Year 2016 Economic Activity Summary Version 1.5, April Abstract

North Pacific Fishery Management Council. Community considerations in Federally-managed fisheries. April 2005

DESCRIPTION OF THE AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT (KEY SOCIO-ECONOMIC TRENDS) AND SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE ALTERNATIVES

DIRECT EMPLOYMENT IMPACTS OF COMMERCIAL FISHING IN COASTAL MISSISSIPPI COUNTIES,

Seafood Industry. The 2012 Juneau and Southeast Alaska Economic Indicators 11/1/12 Page 60

tools for spatial management see the collection by Wright and Scholz (2005).

NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE REPORT ON DEEP-SET BUOY GEAR AMENDMENT SCOPING

Port Graham: Holdings of Limited Entry Permits, Sablefish Quota Shares, and Halibut Quota Shares Through 1998 and Data On Fishery Gross Earnings

Digitization and Discovery. An Acquaintance With Ancient Fishery Data

Updated landings information for the commercial fisheries in Puerto Rico with emphasis on silk and queen snapper and parrotfish fisheries

COUNTRY NOTE ON NATIONAL FISHERIES MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS -- SPAIN

Japan s report on Paragraph 13, CMM

STOCK ASSESSMENT AND FISHERY EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE GROUNDFISH FISHERIES OF THE GULF OF ALASKA AND BERING SEA/ALEUTIAN ISLAND AREA:

Agenda Item H.2.b Supplemental NMFS Total Mortality Report (Website Distribution Only) November 2010

ST. MARY S FIRST NATION FISHERIES DIRECTOR JEREMY PAUL

Prepared by: McDowell Group, Inc. Andy Wink CAP Meeting

Observing and Explaining Coastal Fishery Dynamics : An Application to Ports in California

California s North Coast Fishing Communities Historical Perspective and Recent Trends. Project Summary

Modeling Changes in Fishery Participation and Economic Impacts in Response to Climate Variation and Climate Change

Estimated Discard and Total Catch of Selected Groundfish Species in the 2008 U.S. West Coast Fisheries

The Transformation Status of Marine Commercial Fisheries. and Marine Aquaculture in South Africa

canada s in-depth guide to Sustainable Seafood .org SeaChoice is a sustainable seafood program of the following four conservation groups:

LAPEER MICHIGAN WITHHOLDING TAX GUIDE

31 Several of these communities

Amendment 80 Non-AFA Trawl Gear Catcher/Processor

Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Annual Meeting August 21, 2017

A Threatened Bay: Challenges to the Future of the Penobscot Bay Region and its Communities

Productivity Susceptibility Analysis (PSA) Tool overview and preliminary findings

FishSA: Presentation Jeremy Marillier Executive Director

Annual Pink Shrimp Review

Review of the West Coast Commercial Fishing Industry in 2004

British Columbia's Fisheries & Aquaculture Sector May 2001

Economic Impact of Lobster Sector - Province of New Brunswick and Its Counties

Marine Recreational and Commercial Industries and Activities in Lee and Charlotte Counties: Economic Consequences and Impacts

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE UPDATE ON LANDINGS OF TUNA, SWORDFISH AND OTHER PELAGICS

Appendix F. Commercial and Recreational Fisheries Summary

Fisheries off West Coast States; Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan;

Agenda Item H.7.c Supplemental Public Comment MTC PowerPoint September Midwater Trawlers Cooperative

COASTAL & OFFSHORE PACIFIC CORPORATION 242 Rosa Corte Walnut Creek, CA Via

Economic and operational characteristics of the Hawaii longline fleet in 2000

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES BRANCH FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Integrating Subsistence Fisheries in Local Food systems Case study of Palma district. Mozambique. By: Horacio Gervasio Mozambique

Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill

DSBG Findings Helping Fishermen and Policy Makers Explore the Economics of Deep Set Buoy Gear in the West Coast Swordfish Fishery

Commercial Dungeness Crab Newsletter

Oregon s Ocean Commercial Fisheries

IPHC Regulatory Area 2A Directed Commercial Pacific Halibut Fishery Sample Vessel Fishing Period Limit Options for Longer Fishing Periods

"Present status of Tropical tuna fisheries in Iran"

Economic and Social Impacts of BSAI Crab Rationalization on the Communities of King Cove, Akutan and False Pass

prepared by Steve Parker Marine Resources Program Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Hatfield Marine Science Center Newport, OR 97365

Certification and defining the Unit of Assessment

The University of Georgia

What If You Don t Speak. CPUE-ese? An Alternative Index that Relates Protected Species Interactions to Fish Catch in Hawaii Longline Fisheries

Early in the century the annual halibut catch

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Pacific Island Pelagic Fisheries; 2016 U.S. Territorial

NIOSH Updates in Commercial Fishing Safety Research

Evaluating Potential Fishery Effects of Changes to Other Species Management

Executive Administrator

Winter 2015/ Halibut & Blackcod Market Bulletin

Habitat Omnibus Amendment DEIS draft sections relative to recreational fishery DRAFT. Omnibus Essential Fish Habitat Amendment 2

Orange County MPA Watch A n n u a l R e p o r t

37..Man ANION AMMOMPION Iir ,./11

REPORT ON THE 2017 PACIFIC HALIBUT FISHERIES IN AREA 2A

Final Environmental Impact Statement. for the

Humboldt Bay s Harbor

Agenda Item J.2 Attachment 1 September 2016

Impacts of the US West Coast salmon ocean fishery closure on salmon troll vessels

FILED 11/22/ :49 AM ARCHIVES DIVISION SECRETARY OF STATE

FISHING GREEN. Richard H. Parrish PhD Fisheries Biologist. December 2, 2013

Socioeconomic Impacts of Crab Rationalization on the Aleutian East Borough Communities of False Pass, Akutan, and King Cove

California s North Coast Fishing Communities Historical Perspective and Recent Trends. Eureka Fishing Community Profile

Prince William Sound Aquaculture Corporation Economic Impact Update for 2010

Pre-Season Testing Protocol for the Tri-State Coastal Dungeness crab Commercial Fishery. Revised September 2013

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE UPDATE ON LANDINGS OF TUNA, SWORDFISH AND OTHER PELAGICS

REPORT ON THE 2018 PACIFIC HALIBUT FISHERIES IN AREA 2A (10/5/2018)

The West Coast Trawl Buyback Program and Ex-Vessel Revenues at Monterey Bay Ports

Re: Agenda Item I.2. - Deep-Set Buoy Gear Authorization

Economic Impacts of BSAI Crab Rationalization on Kodiak Fishing Employment and Earnings and Kodiak Businesses. A Preliminary Analysis

Review of financial and economic performance of the Fijian offshore longline fishery

Cumulative Impact of Federal User Fees on the Commercial Fish Harvesting Sector

DRAFT SUMMARY MINUTES Ad Hoc Vessel Monitoring System Committee The Benson Hotel 309 SW Broadway Portland, Oregon October 7, 2004

GROUNDFISH MANAGEMENT

The Economics of Atlantic Highly Migratory Species For-Hire Fishing Trips July - November 2013 Clifford Hutt and George Silva

California s Marine Environment. Highly Variable Narrow Continental Shelf Upwelling and El Nino

Problems of TAC forecast development for multi-species fisheries in the Sakhalin-Kuriles region

Fish or Cut Bait! The Case for Individual Transferable Quotas in the Salmon Fishery of British Columbia. edited by Laura Jones and Michael Walker

Essential Fish Habitat

GROUNDFISH MANAGEMENT TEAM (GMT) REPORT ON CONSIDERATION OF INSEASON ADJUSTMENTS

NFR 8. Tuna fisheries in French Polynesia in SCTB16 Working Paper

Implan Modeling for Fisheries on Florida s East Coast: Alternative Approaches

Transcription:

California s North Coast Fishing Communities Historical Perspective and Recent Trends Appendix C: Methodological Detail Customization of PacFIN Landings Receipt Data to Characterize Commercial Fisheries State and PacFIN Landings Receipts Washington, Oregon and California (W-O-C) require first receivers to submit receipts for all commercial landings made in those states. Information recorded on landings receipts includes (but is not limited to) vessel ID, date and port of landing, landed weight by gear and species/species group, ex-vessel price, and receiver ID. The Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission manages W-O-C landings receipt data collected since 1981 as part of its PacFIN program. 1 One of PacFIN s responsibilities is to standardize each state s landings receipt data, to make it comparable coastwide. For instance: Vessel IDs reported on landings receipts are registration numbers assigned by state fishery agencies to individual vessels. While these numbers uniquely identify a vessel within a state, use of these identifiers for coastwide analysis can lead to double counting of vessels that land fish in multiple states. To address this issue, PacFIN replaces the state registration numbers with a unique identifier consisting of (a) the Coast Guard documentation number for vessels of five net tons or more, or (b) the state marine board number assigned by the state Department of Motor Vehicles for vessels of less than five net tons (which are not subject to Coast Guard documentation). PacFIN converts each state s numeric port codes to a common set of alphanumeric PacFIN codes (e.g., CRS = Crescent City, ERK = Eureka, BRG = Fort Bragg). PacFIN converts each state s species codes to alphanumeric market categories (e.g., CHNK = Chinook salmon, DCRB = Dungeness crab, SABL = sablefish). Each market category consists of a single species or a group of taxonomically similar species that receive the same exvessel price in a given landing. PacFIN also assigns individual market categories to species complexes and management groups, as appropriate, to facilitate fishery management and monitoring. PacFIN converts each state s gear codes to a common set of PacFIN gear codes (e.g., MDT = midwater trawl, SEN = seine, CPT = crab pot). These gear codes are further aggregated into gear groups (e.g., TWL = all trawls except shrimp trawls, NET = all net gear except trawl, POT = all pot and trap gear). In addition to providing the landed weights reported on the landings receipts, PacFIN converts landed weights to round weight equivalents for species that are typically not landed in the round (e.g., salmon, sablefish). Customization of PacFIN Landings Receipts For the regional and port profiles, fishing activity was characterized in terms of effort (vessels and trips), landings, ex-vessel value, prices, and buyers (first receivers), by fishery. Although the profiles pertain to North Coast ports, all W-O-C landings receipts were 1

analyzed to ensure that information on fishery participation and average per-vessel revenue for vessels landing fish at North Coast ports included their participation in all fisheries in all West Coast states. In order to provide the detailed fishery-specific information needed for the profiles, 1981 2007 PacFIN landings receipt data for W-O-C were customized as follows: A fishery was defined as a particular combination of a market category (or categories) and gear group. Thirty-four fisheries were defined in this manner: (1) coastal pelagic species seine, (2) squid seine, (3) salmon troll, (4) salmon net, (5) herring gillnet/dive, (6) swordfish drift gillnet, (7) swordfish longline, (8) swordfish harpoon, (9) albacore troll, (10) tuna seine, (11) tuna longline, (12) shark gillnet, (13) shark hook-and-line, (14) nonwhiting groundfish trawl, (15) whiting trawl, (16) rockfish gillnet, (17) halibut hook-and-line, (18) halibut set net, (19) rockfish/lingcod hook-and-line/pot, (20) sablefish hook-and-line/pot, (21) cucumber net/trawl/dive, (22) urchin dive, (23) crab pot, (24) lobster pot, (25) shrimp/prawn trawl, (26) shrimp/prawn pot, (27) abalone dive, (28) other shellfish dredge/digger, (29) sturgeon gillnet, (30) white seabass/ yellowtail gillnet, (31) white croaker gillnet, (32) eulachon net, and (33) hagfish pot, and (34) all else. The 33 specific fisheries identified above were sufficiently comprehensive of W-O-C fishing activity that only modest amounts of activity had to be relegated to the 34 th all else category. Depending on the year, 1.1% 3.4% of boats, 1.0% 6.0% of trips, 0.2% 1.9% of landings, and 0.5% 1.5% of revenue were assigned to the all else category. A fishing trip was defined as a unique vessel ID-date of landing combination. While it is possible for a vessel to make multiple trips on a single date, it is not possible to identify instances of multiple trips from PacFIN, as landings receipts include information on the date but not the time of landing. Thus numbers of trips, as defined by vessel ID and date, may underestimate actual trips (although the extent of such underestimation is believed to be slight). Once defined, each fishing trip was characterized in terms of total landings and revenue, and assigned to a fishery, receiver (or buyer) and port as follows: A fishing trip may involve participation in more than one fishery (e.g., setting/ retrieving crab pots and groundfish trawling). For purposes of this report, each trip was assigned to the fishery accounting for the plurality of revenue derived from the trip. For 86% of the trips made between 1981 and 2007, 100% of trip revenue was attributable to a single fishery. For an additional 8% of trips, the fishery to which they were assigned accounted for 90% 99% of trip revenue. A vessel may deliver fish to multiple receivers after a given trip. For purposes of this report, each trip was assigned to the receiver accounting for the plurality of revenue from the trip. About 4% of trips made during the period 1981 2007 involved deliveries to multiple receivers. On occasion, a vessel may deliver fish at multiple ports upon returning from a fishing trip. For purposes of this report, each trip was assigned to the port accounting for the plurality of revenue for the trip. About 1% of trips made between 1981 and 2007 involved deliveries to multiple ports. Data Series from U.S. Bureau of the Census County Business Patterns The County Business Patterns (CBP) data series provides annual, county-level information on economic activity bybusinesses 2

with paid employees. 2 Activity is described in terms of mid-march employment, firstquarter payroll, annual payroll, and number of establishments. According to the U.S. Census: Payroll numbers include all forms of compensation such as salaries, wages, reported tips, commissions, bonuses, vacation allowances, sick-leave pay, employee contributions to qualified pension plans, and the value of taxable fringe benefits. For corporations, it includes amounts paid to officers and executives; for unincorporated businesses, it does not include profit or other compensation of proprietors or partners. Payroll is reported before deductions for Social Security, income tax, insurance, union dues, etc. First-quarter payroll consists of payroll during the January-to-March quarter. Mid-March employment includes full- and part-time employees, including salaried officers and executives of corporations who are on the payroll in the pay period including March 12. Included are employees on paid sick leave, holidays, and vacations; not included are proprietors and partners of unincorporated businesses. An establishment is defined as a single physical location at which business is conducted or services or industrial operations are performed. It is not necessarily identical with a company or enterprise, which may consist of one or more establishments. When two or more activities are carried on at a single location under a single ownership, all activities generally are grouped together as a single establishment. The entire establishment is classified on the basis of its major activity and all data are included in that classification. CBP categorizes activity within each county by sector, with sectors based on the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS). The NAICS classification scheme is hierarchical. For instance, sector 11 (Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting) includes subsectors such as 111 (Crop Production), 112 (Animal Production), 113 (Forestry and Logging), 114 (Fishing, Hunting and Trapping) and 115 (Support Activities for Agriculture and Forestry). Each three-digit code is further subdivided into four- and fivedigit codes that define each subsector at greater levels of specificity. 3 Data are sometimes suppressed in CBP tables, for example, to avoid releasing data that did not meet publication standards or to avoid disclosing data of individual companies. In the Regional Profile, two-digit NAICS sectors are used to characterize county business activity, as the likelihood of data suppression increases at finer levels of classification. Nonemployer Statistics While County Business Patterns focuses on businesses with paid employees, the Nonemployer Statistics data series provides information (i.e., total establishments, total annual receipts) on businesses without paid employees. 4 As with CBP, this information is available by county and NAICS sector. According to the U.S. Census: A nonemployer business is one that has no paid employees, has annual business receipts of $1,000 or more ($1 or more in the construction industries), and is subject to federal income taxes. Most nonemployers are self-employed individuals operating very small unincorporated businesses, which may or may not be the owner s principal source of income. for nonemployers we count each distinct business income tax return filed by a nonemployer business as a firm. A nonemployer business may operate from its owner s home address or from a separate physical location. Most geography codes are derived from the business owner s mailing address, which may not be the same as the physical location of the business. 3

The composition of nonemployer receipts may differ from receipts data published for employer establishments. For example, for wholesale agents and brokers without payroll (nonemployers), the receipts item contains commissions received or earnings. In contrast, for wholesale agents and brokers with payroll (employers), the sales and receipts item published in the Economic Census represents the value of the goods involved in the transactions. Field Data Collection We collected field data though interviews, small group meetings, observation and related activities conducted between Fall 2007 and Spring 2009. 5 All field activities were directed toward understanding the history of local fisheries and the fishing community, current status and trends, infrastructure needed, provided and used. We used an iterative process using archival data analysis to inform fieldwork, and fieldwork to inform further archival data analysis, to build an integrated and historically grounded understanding of the North Coast fishing ports studied. Altogether, we engaged more than 180 people through interviews and/or group meetings at the four study ports, including 73 fishermen, 24 seafood business owners and staff, 31 fishery-support business operators, 12 harbor managers and staff, and a number of other individuals. We conducted semi-structured interviews with individual fishermen, fish receivers, processors, fishery-support business operators, harbor managers and staff and other knowledgeable individuals in each port. We sought broad coverage within and across these groups, and used a modified snowball sampling technique to identify potential interviewees. Interviews ranged in length from 30 minutes to two hours, and addressed several topics including: involvement in fisheries, key business/ operation characteristics, linkages within and among fisheries, and infrastructure and its use, and key factors and events that have affected local fisheries and the community over time. We conducted small group meetings with groups of fishermen (e.g., trawlers, charter operators, trollers) to collect summary information about characteristics of and use patterns in those fisheries, infrastructure needs and uses, and key factors and events that have affected local fisheries and the community over time. In addition, we observed fish receiving and processing and support activities to develop a practical sense of the social and economic organization of local fisheries and the fishing community. We analyzed all field data (fieldnotes, documents, and other materials collected) and archival materials (e.g., harbor reports, newspaper articles, fishery bulletins) for content specific to the historic and presentday operations and circumstances of local fisheries and the fishing community. 4

Endnotes 1 http://pacfin.psmfc.org/. 2 http://www.census.gov/econ/cbp/definitions.htm. 3 See http://www.census.gov/eos/www/naics/ for a complete description of NAICS codes. 4 http://www.census.gov/econ/nonemployer/definitions.htm. 5 Additional data were collected during the review process, in which study participants from each community had the opportunity to review the draft profile(s) to which they had contributed. 5