Corridor Advisory Group Meeting #1 June 7, 2018

Similar documents
Appendix A-1: Purpose and Need Statement

Corridor Advisory Group and Task Force Meeting #10. July 27, 2011

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY VISIONING MEETING. August 23 24, 2017

Speaker: Brian Dranzik, Fiscal & Policy Administrator Milwaukee County

Everett Transit Action Plan. Community Open House November 16, 2015

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station

I-105 Corridor Sustainability Study (CSS)

City of Davenport CitiBus Public Transportation Study. April 2015

Central Harlem Avenue Corridor Study

Transit-Driven Complete Streets

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY

122 Avenue: 107 Street to Fort Road

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority

TRANSIT SUPPORTIVE LAND USE. JUNE 2013 Prepared by LANta Renderings by Molly Slevin Wood

Hennepin Avenue Reconstruction Washington Avenue to 12 th Street

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

Chapter 3 BUS IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

Pocatello Regional Transit Master Transit Plan Draft Recommendations

State Road 54/56 Tampa Bay s Northern Loop. The Managed Lane Solution Linking I-75 to the Suncoast Parkway

Overview: Phase 3 Draft Development and Circulation Plans, White Bear Station

Arlington County 10-Year Transit Development Plan & Premium Transit Network Briefing. May 2016

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

Central Harlem Avenue Corridor Study

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Wood and Cortland Neighborhood Greenways

A Matter of Fairness: ROCOG s Environmental Justice Protocol. What is Mobility Limitation?

Technical Working Group November 15, 2017

Aurora Corridor to E Line

95 th Street Corridor Transportation Plan. Steering Committee Meeting #2

North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

Roadways. Roadways III.

Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary January 19 LPT ATTACHMENT 2.

Providing an Efficient and Multi-modal Transportation System

SR 693 (Pasadena Avenue) Corridor Study from Shore Drive South to 66 th Street

Peterborough Council on Aging

Appendix A-2: Screen 1 Alternatives Report

Public Comment Meeting Geary BRT Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Report

Community Task Force November 15, 2017

Preliminary Transportation Analysis

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Highway 217 Corridor Study. Phase I Overview Report

Market Factors and Demand Analysis. World Bank

North Avenue Corridor Study

Watertown Complete Streets Prioritization Plan. Public Meeting #1 December 14, 2017

The North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy and Western Richmond Terrace 1 : The Forgotten Corridor

Agency Advisory Group Meeting #3 and Walk Audit Anchorage Non-Motorized Plan

POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Comprehensive Report. Chicago Department of Transportation. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. URS O-H Community Partners EJM Engineering MKC Associates

Project Narrative. Albuquerque, NM. July 31, 2015

Safe Streets. City of Lake Forest Park. March 21, 2017

Pedestrian, Bicycle and Traffic Calming Strategic Implementation Plan. January 18, 2011

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

Planning Study SR 976. Project Advisory Team Meeting May 24, 2017

About the Active Transportation Alliance

Main-McVay Transit Study: Phase 2 Options Definition and High Level Constraints Evaluation

Access BART: TOD and Improved Connections. October 29, 2008

SMART 1 Public Meeting #1. February 24, 2016

VI. Market Factors and Deamnd Analysis

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

Basalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations

Sixth Line Development - Transit Facilities Plan

Corridor Vision Workshop Summary James Madison Elementary February 22,2018

Title. Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee December 12, Brad Larson Metro District MnDOT

Memorandum. Sunday, July 13, Saturday, July 19, 2014

Rail Station Fact Sheet University of Dallas Station

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

Transit Workshop with MPO Board

Fitting Light Rail through Well-established Communities

SETTINGS AND OPPORTUNITIES MOBILITY & ACCESS

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

CITY OF WEST LAKE HILLS. Forest View Neighborhood Traffic Calming Study

Calgary Transit Route 302 Southeast BRT Year One Review June

Montclair s Complete Streets Experience

Cranberry Area Transit Study Steering Committee Meeting

Blue Ribbon Commission Report Recommendations on Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure Improvements

Los Altos Hills Town Council - June 18, 2015 Palo Alto City Council June 22, AGENDA ITEM #2.B Presentation

Philadelphia Bus Network Choices Report

Traffic Impact Memorandum. May 22, 2018

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

Xin Ge, MCP Candidate 14, PennDesign. Roosevelt Boulevard Transit Improvement Plan

6.0 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES 6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 BICYCLE DEMAND AND SUITABILITY Bicycle Demand

City of Seattle Edward B. Murray, Mayor

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 7 DISTRICT WIDE BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO TRANSIT SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Chicago Safe Routes to School Safe Routes to High School (SRTS/SRTHS)

Beyond First First Last Last Mile Strategies. APA National Conference April 3, 2016 Chelsea Richer, AICP Fehr & Peers

Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit SFMTA Citizens Advisory Committee

Transportation Improvement Plan SECTION2

Station Plan: Penn & 43rd Avenue

NEWMARKET UPHAM S CORNER

Rehabilitating First- and Last- Mile Connections

Rail Station Fact Sheet CentrePort/DFW Airport Station

METRO RTA TRANSIT MASTER PLAN. May 25-26, 2011

Chapter 9: Pedestrians and Bicyclists

Transcription:

Corridor Advisory Group Meeting #1 June 7, 2018

Agenda Introductions Project Overview CAG Role and Goals for Today Existing Conditions Review Discussion and Next Steps CTA bus at Halsted and 87 th Streets 2

Introductions Lead Agencies Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) Pace Suburban Bus Project Team CDM Smith Metro Strategies EJM Engineering 3

4 Project Overview

Project Area 11 mile corridor Harvey Transportation Center to 79 th & 95 th Street Red Line Stations Significant Local Service CTA routes #8A and #108 Pace routes #352 and #359 Varied land uses Commercial Residential Forest preserve 5

Project Purpose Recommend transit improvements for the corridor s over 7,500 daily customers Potential Improvements Realigned Bus Stops Real Time Information Transit Signal Optimization Potential Improvements Enhanced coordinated service plans Realigned bus stops Traffic signal optimization and prioritization Roadway improvements Updated passenger amenities Pace Pulse stations south of 95 th Street 6

Pace Pulse Program Limited-stop express service New Wi-Fi equipped vehicles with USB charging ports Real-time bus arrival signage Vertical marker with Pulse branding and real time information for easy station identification Near-level boarding platforms to expedite passenger boarding Customizable features to reflect community character Pulse Station Rendering Pulse Corridor Development Plan 7

CTA/Pace Collaboration Pulse Milwaukee Arterial Rapid Transit Line, Central Station, will be used by Pace and CTA 95 th Street Station, serving both CTA and Pace buses North Shore Coordination Plan identifies opportunities for coordinated improvements of Pace and CTA bus service 8 North Shore Coordination Plan Study Area CTA Red Line 95 th Street Station Pulse Milwaukee Line, Central Station

Project Timeline 9

10 Corridor Advisory Group (CAG) Role & Goals for Today

Role of the Corridor Advisory Group (CAG) Identify transit access and mobility issues Provide guidance on solutions Represent communities and transit users We want to hear from you! Pace Harvey Transportation Center 11

CAG Meeting #1 Goals Pace bus trailed by CTA bus at Halsted and 95 th Streets 1. Review existing conditions 2. Identify opportunities for transit improvements in the corridor 3. Gather feedback on specific corridor needs and deficiencies 12

13 Existing Conditions Review

Corridor Service CTA routes #108 and #8A Pace routes #352 and #359 Many other CTA and Pace bus routes connect to the corridor 14

Corridor Service Characteristics Frequency: 10 min during peak and 20-30 min off peak Span of Service: 15 Pace: 24 hour service CTA: ~6am to 8:30 pm Average Weekday Corridor Boardings: 7,576 Route #352 is Pace's highest ridership route Pace bus on 95 th Street CTA bus on Route #8A

Average Daily Boardings by Stop Popular connections at 79 th and 95 th Street Red Line Stations Popular Bus Transfers: 16 Pace #352 to East-West service along Sibley Road via #350 and #364 CTA #8A to East-West service on 95 th, 111 th, and 119 th Streets Most common CTA trip is using #108 and #8A to access Loop, West Side and Northside Chicago neighborhoods via L system

Neighborhoods Chatham Roseland West Pullman Grand Crossing Morgan Park Auburn Gresham Washington Heights 17

Wards 6 9 21 17 34 18

Municipalities Thornton Township Calumet Township Thornton Township Lake Township Village of South Holland Village of Phoenix Village of Calumet Park Village of Dolton Village of Riverdale City of Harvey 19

Population Demographics Corridor* Cook County Population 127,668 5,203,499 Population per Square Mile Population per Square Mile. 6,461 5,506 *All Census tracts directly adjacent to the corridor Source: US Census (2016) 20

Transit Dependency Population with No Vehicle Available Travel Habits Corridor* Cook County Population with No Vehicle Available 13% 10% Commute via Transit 23% 18% Drive Alone to Work 67% 62% *All Census tracts directly adjacent to the corridor Source: US Census (2016) 21

Jobs Jobs Measure Corridor* Cook County Jobs 14,584 2,379,923 Jobs per Square Mile 1,111 2,482 Jobs per Square Mile *Within ½ mile of corridor Source: CMAP 2010 Employment Status Measure Labor Force Participation Rate Employment/ Population Ratio Corridor* Cook County 57% 66% 45% 60% Unemployment Rate 21% 10% *All Census tracts directly adjacent to the corridor Employment rates for individuals age 16 or older Source: US Census ACS 2012-2016 22 Source: CMAP (2010)

Land Use Classification Corridor* Cook County Residential 51% 41% Commercial/ Mixed Use 5% 7% Residential Parcels Institutional 7% 7% Industrial 5% 7% Transportation/ Utilities Recreational/ Open Space 13% 9% 10% 20% Agricultural 0% 4% Vacant 10% 5% *Usable Parcels within ½ mile of corridor 23 Source: CMAP (2015)

Land Use Classification Corridor* Cook County Residential 51% 41% Commercial/ Mixed Use 5% 7% Commercial and Industrial Parcels Institutional 7% 7% Industrial 5% 7% Transportation/ Utilities Recreational/ Open Space 13% 9% 10% 20% Agricultural 0% 4% Vacant 10% 5% *Usable Parcels within ½ mile of corridor 24 Source: CMAP (2015)

Land Use Classification Corridor* Cook County Residential 51% 41% Commercial/ Mixed Use 5% 7% Institutional 7% 7% Industrial 5% 7% Within ½ mile of corridor, there are: 568 acres of vacant land 293 vacant parcels of at least ¼ acre Vacant Parcels Transportation/ Utilities Recreational/ Open Space 13% 9% 10% 20% Agricultural 0% 4% Vacant 10% 5% *Usable Parcels within ½ mile of corridor 25 Source: CMAP (2015)

Land Use Classification Corridor* Cook County Residential 51% 41% Commercial/ Mixed Use 5% 7% Combined Parcels Institutional 7% 7% Industrial 5% 7% Transportation/ Utilities Recreational/ Open Space 13% 9% 10% 20% Agricultural 0% 4% Vacant 10% 5% *Usable Parcels within ½ mile of corridor 26 Source: CMAP (2015)

Sidewalks Both sides of the street, except: West side between 124 th Street & 127 th Street Both sides between 129 th Place & Forest View Avenue Some sidewalk sections need repair and ADA compliance 95 th Street Halsted Street, between Vincennes Avenue & Summit Avenue 27

Parking 2,000 on-street spaces 88% only snow restriction 8% are restricted parking (evening, permit, peak, etc.) 4% are paid spaces Halsted Street: 79 th to 80 th (both sides) 79 th Street: Halsted to Emerald (both sides) Halsted Street near 80 th Street Halsted Street and 149 th Street intersection 28

Traffic 36 signalized intersections Worst intersections at 103 rd, 111 th, and 147 th Streets Operation AM PM Well 28 28 Acceptable 5 7 Poor 3 1 Failure 0 0 AM Peak Intersection Level of Service PM Peak Intersection Level of Service 29

Bus Speed Significantly slower north of 103 rd Street AM Peak Northbound PM Peak Southbound 30

Key Corridor Takeaways High ridership corridor, especially for Pace 23% of population commutes via transit Halsted Street is primarily commercial/mixed use Project area is 50% residential and 10% vacant Northern segment: Higher density More transit dependent population Slower travel speeds 31

Key Service Takeaways Transit connections to CTA Red Line are critical Bus speeds slow north of 103 rd Street, particularly PM southbound Pace and CTA service overlaps Service north of 95 th Street ends at 8:30 pm 32

33 Discussion and Next Steps

Discussion Are the reviewed conditions consistent with what you see in the corridor? Are there additional conditions to discuss? What works well about this corridor? What are the needs and deficiencies you see? Are there stakeholders with unique needs who are not represented? Pace bus and CTA bus at Halsted and 95 th Streets 34

Next Steps June October 2018 Project team review comments, complete issues analysis and draft Potential Corridor Improvements October 2018 CAG Meeting #2: discuss Potential Corridor Improvements 35

Contact Information To speak to a CTA or Pace representative, contact: Sukmeke Watkins (CTA) Government & Community Relations Representative (312) 681-2793 Martin Sandoval (Pace: Chicago) Community Relations Representative (847) 217-9098 For general project questions, email: SouthHalstedBus@transitchicago.com Website: www.transitchicago.com/planning/ SouthHalstedBus/ Jessica Rybarczyk (Pace: Suburbs) Community Relations Representative (847) 372-2077 36

37 Thank you!