Application for Exempted Fishing Permit

Similar documents
ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Red Drum

2012 Maryland FMP Report (July 2013) Section 15. Red Drum (Sciaenops ocellatus)

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Red Drum

Billing Code: P. Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic;

Highly Migratory Species SWFSC/NMFS Report

Dauphin Lake Fishery. Status of Walleye Stocks and Conservation Measures

Species Profile: Red Drum Benchmark Assessment Finds Resource Relatively Stable with Overfishing Not Occurring

Update: This document has been updated to include biological information on red snapper and information from the recent Gulf of Mexico Fishery

2007 REVIEW OF THE ATLANTIC STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR. SPOT (Leiostomus xanthurus) 2006 FISHING YEAR

Tab B, No /10/16. Red Snapper Management for Federally Permitted Charter Vessels. White Paper

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

A non-equilibrium surplus production model of black grouper (Mycteroperca bonaci) in southeast United States waters

West Coast Rock Lobster. Description of sector. History of the fishery: Catch history

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Black Drum

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission DRAFT ADDENDUM I TO THE BLACK DRUM FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR PUBLIC COMMENT

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South

Goliath Grouper Public Workshops August and October, 2017

2002 REVIEW OF THE ATLANTIC STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR BLUEFISH (Pomatomus saltatrix)

Biological Review of the 2014 Texas Closure

Keeping Gulf Red Snapper on the Road to Recovery

2012 REVIEW OF THE ATLANTIC STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR. RED DRUM (Sciaenops ocellatus) 2011 FISHING YEAR

Unless otherwise noted, images throughout the presentation are by FWC.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic;

Chesapeake Bay Jurisdictions White Paper on Draft Addendum IV for the Striped Bass Fishery Management Plan

Alberta Conservation Association 2011/12 Project Summary Report. Project Name: Walleye Stock Assessment Program 2011/12 Moose and Fawcett Lakes

Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish Fishery of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands;

Status and Trends Report: 2012 Penaeid Shrimp Species Account FL FWCC FWRI SEDAR-PW6-RD July 2014

Nancy E. Kohler, Danielle Bailey, Patricia A. Turner, and Camilla McCandless SEDAR34-WP-25. Submitted: 10 June 2013

North Carolina. Striped Mullet FMP. Update

2000 REVIEW OF THE ATLANTIC STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR BLUEFISH (Pomatomus saltatrix)

ADDENDUM I TO AMENDMENT 3 OF THE INTERSTATE FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR WEAKFISH

Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Fisheries. AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission An Overview. Tina Berger, Director of Communications

STOCK STATUS OF SOUTHERN BLUEFIN TUNA

SEDAR 28 Gulf and South Atlantic -- Spanish Mackerel and Cobia Workshop Document List Document # Title Authors

PUBLIC HEARING GUIDE 10/4/12

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic;

GCRL s Catch More Fish with Science Spotted Seatrout. Read Hendon Center for Fisheries Research & Development & Capt. Matt Tusa Shore Thing Charters

Gulf States Seaward Boundary Changes Implications for Gulf Fisheries Management

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Public Hearing Document

Fisheries Off West Coast States; Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries; Annual. AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

Phone: Fax: A point of contact for application questions: Mark Lingo 4200 Smith School Rd.

5. purse seines 3 000

Shortfin mako sharks declared overfished

The 2015 stock assessment of Common Snook, Centropomus undecimalis

Sheepshead Fishery Overview South Atlantic State/Federal Management Board May 2014 Introduction Life History Landings

Fisheries Off West Coast States; Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries; Annual. AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

Modifications to Gulf Reef Fish and South Atlantic Snapper Grouper Fishery Management Plans

Agenda Item Summary BACKGROUND. Public Involvement ISSUE ANALYSIS. Attachment 1

Draft Addendum V For Board Review. Coastal Sharks Management Board August 8, 2018

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission

Georgia Department of Natural Resources Coastal Resources Division Management Plan: Tripletail June 2017

Worldwide Office 4245 North Fairfax Drive, Suite 100 Arlington, VA 22203

Atlantic croaker, Micropogonias undulatus (Linnaeus, 1766)

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE UPDATE ON LANDINGS OF TUNA, SWORDFISH AND OTHER PELAGICS

STRIPED BASS FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENTl

Current Status and Future. Hudson River American shad stock. New York State Dept. of Environmental Conservation

South Atlantic Council Issues

Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Fisheries. AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Coastal Migratory Pelagic Resources of the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Region;

Fall Walleye Index Netting at Jackson Lake, Alberta, 2010

SAC-08-10a Staff activities and research plans. 8 a Reunión del Comité Científico Asesor 8 th Meeting of the Scientific Advisory Committee

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Fisheries Off West Coast States; Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries; Amendment to

Unless otherwise noted, images throughout the presentation are by FWC.

For-hire Data Collection. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council Red Snapper For-hire Advisory Panel December 2-3, 2014 Tampa, FL

Big Canyon 67 miles upstream. 38 miles upstream

REVISION OF THE WPTT PROGRAM OF WORK

Fall Walleye Index Netting at Sylvan Lake, Alberta, 2012

Reef Fish Amendment 32 Gag and Red Grouper

Establish interim harvest reductions that end overfishing and rebuild the spawning stock biomass by 2015.

2013 REVIEW OF THE ATLANTIC STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR. SPANISH MACKEREL (Scomberomorus maculatus)

GUIDE TO ESTIMATING TOTAL ALLOWABLE CATCH USING SIZE FREQUENCY IN CATCH, EFFORT DATA, AND MPAS

2001 REVIEW OF THE ATLANTIC STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR WEAKFISH (Cynoscion regalis)

HADDOCK ON THE SOUTHERN SCOTIAN SHELF AND IN THE BAY OF FUNDY (DIV. 4X/5Y)

Coastal Migratory Pelagics Joint Amendment 28 (Separate management plans/ permits)

Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting. AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

2014 REVIEW OF THE ATLANTIC STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR. SPANISH MACKEREL (Scomberomorus maculatus)

17-06 BFT RECOMMENDATION BY ICCAT FOR AN INTERIM CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR WESTERN ATLANTIC BLUEFIN TUNA

NZ Sport Fishing Council submission on the proposal for an inseason increase to the total allowable catch for southern bluefin tuna

Black Sea Bass Advisory Panel Information Document

INTERIM MANAGEMENT MEASURES FOR ACHIEVING SUSTAINABLE HARVEST OF SPOTTED SEATROUT

Kirt Hughes Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Region 6 - Fish Program Manager

IOTC 2015 SC18 ES06[E]

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Craig A. Brown. NOAA Fisheries, Southeast Fisheries Center, Sustainable Fisheries Division 75 Virginia Beach Drive, Miami, FL, , USA

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Atlantic Menhaden

3.4.3 Advice June Barents Sea and Norwegian Sea Cod in Subareas I and II (Norwegian coastal waters cod)

Brief History of the Gulf Menhaden Purse-Seine Fishery. Ray Mroch NMFS Beaufort Laboratory

Certification Determination. Louisiana Blue Crab Commercial Fishery

NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE REPORT ON DEEP-SET BUOY GEAR AMENDMENT SCOPING

Fisheries Controversy at the Capitol

Groundfish Science Report

WORKING GROUP ON STOCK ASSESSMENTS 5 TH MEETING DOCUMENT SAR-5-05 BET A

Using Population Models to Evaluate Management Alternatives for Gulf-strain Striped Bass

Transcription:

Application for Exempted Fishing Permit February 25, 2015 Red Drum Exempted Fishing Permit For the Economic Exclusion Zone in the Gulf of Mexico 2015-2016 Mississippi Department of Marine Resources 1141 Bayview Avenue Biloxi, MS 39530 Point of Contact: Joe Jewell Joe.jewell@dmr.ms.gov

Introduction Red Drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) is a highly sought after species by sport fishermen in Mississippi coastal waters. They are primarily targeted as sub-adults in the estuaries because there is no legal fishery in offshore federal waters where adult fish live. The current Fishery Management Plan (FMP) last amended in 1988 by the Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission (GSMFC), prohibited all harvest of Red Drum from the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), and it remains so today. Since the federal moratorium, there has been a lack of recent assessment addressing vital life-history traits of Red Drum in Mississippi coastal waters and adjacent federal waters, including growth rates, length-at-age composition, histology, and diet (Powers 2012). Historically, fishery dependent census data collected from commercial fishermen using purse seines and gill nets in the EEZ contributed a major source of information (Comyns et al. 1991). Purse seines have been used in the past for tag and recapture surveys as well (Linton 2008), but in light of current restrictions to state waters, the logistics of completing such surveys have become much more complicated. These current restrictions limit the area from which spawning aggregations can be sampled. Furthermore, the turbidity of the water within the state s boundaries impedes the location of large spawning aggregations by spotter plane (Lohoefener et al. 1987). We believe the sampling methods described herein will be less likely to incur potential impacts on the spawning stock than the traditional methods. Current monitoring for Red Drum in Mississippi state waters utilizes gill nets with separate panels of mesh sizes 2.0, 2.5, 2.75, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 5, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0. The station locations are almost exclusively estuarine, and the gill nets are selective for Red Drum ranging from approximately 10 to 30 inches total length (TL) (Porch et al. 2002). Larger individuals of the existing data set are obtained from the for-hire-industry. Captains of these boats participate in the monitoring by donating carcasses for processing by MDMR. These current sampling methods have not yielded sufficient amounts data for fish sizes greater than 20 inches TL. The for-hire industry is currently not permitted to take Red Drum from the EEZ where the preponderance of adult Red Drum reside. Justification and Methods In order to perform a comprehensive stock assessment it is vital that biological data from all life stages of the species be incorporated into the analyses. Issuance of an Exempted Fishing Permit would give Mississippi Department of Marine Resources (MDMR) access to Red Drum in later life-stages thereby ensuring a more robust data set. The lack of data for younger or older fish can render inaccurate estimates of growth parameters (Haddon 2001) used for developing the Age at Length Key (ALK). The existing data set contains only a poor representation of the mature, spawning-capable life stage of Red Drum and is completely void of any index of fecundity and diet composition for all life stages. Considering that Red Drum in Mississippi mature by age 6 at the latest (Murphy and Taylor 1990), and can live greater than 40 years (Murphy and Munyandorero 2009, Murphy and Taylor 1990), the existing data set is only representative of approximately 15% of the age classes for Red Drum. It is imperative that a more robust ALK, an index of fecundity, and composition of diet be determined to ensure reliable results from currently ongoing, as well as future stock assessments.

To provide collections for the needed analyses, vessels of the for-hire industry will be permitted one fish per person per trip from the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), having no length restrictions, with a quota of 30,000 lbs. total harvest over two years (approximately 1000 fish per year). Anglers will be allowed to keep their fish upon completion of data collection and removal of tissue/hard parts needed for analyses. The quota is to be enforced via mandatory reporting in conglomeration with current monitoring that employs mandatory reporting techniques. Vessel captains will be required to apply for each trip and must report catch for every trip via mandatory trip reporting system already in place within Mississippi. If 50% of the quota is met early in the first year, adjustments will be made to ensure the maximum is not exceeded. All data collected within the EFP will be available for state based and federal stock assessments upon request. Collection Focus and Analysis Population Genetics: Molecular techniques will be used to identify possible meta-popluations and genetic structure within the central Gulf of Mexico. After fish collection, a small tissue sample will be removed from the pectoral fin (~1cm³) of each fish and placed in preservation buffer (Seutin et al., 1991). The samples will then be stored (- 20 C) at The University of Southern Mississippi (Hattiesburg) for genetic analyses (mtdna). Additional efforts will be made (tissue kits provided to vessel captains) for anglers to collect fin tissue from additional fish caught and released as this in not a lethal collection method. Diet: Stomach contents will be collected from each fish and analyzed for prey identification as well as concentrations of stable isotopes. Tissue samples from each Red Drum will be removed, frozen (0 C), and analyzed at The Gulf Coast Research Laboratory (GCRL) for stable isotopes identification as well (Ute et al. 2005). Outputs from these analyses will be used to identify trophic placement of Red Drum and prey items. Findings of both stomach and tissue analyses will then be compared to elucidate any difference in the proportion of food items ingested versus items assimilated. Age: Many of the models frequently used in stock assessments require the development of an Age at Length Key (ALK). This is estimated from samples collected from a population and used to predict the mean length-at-age over the lifetime of the species. Reliable estimates are vital to the accuracy of the stock assessment. Red Drum collected under this permit will be measured (mm) for Total Length (TL), Fork Length (FL), and Standard Length (SL) as well as weighed (g). Otoliths will be removed, allowed to air dry, and processed according to the methods set forth in A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico Fishes published by the Gulf states Marine Fisheries Commission. These observed lengths and ages will be the inputs used in developing the ALK. Histology: Sex ratios, maturation of oocytes as well as fecundity analyses will be addressed by removing the reproductive organs of the Red Drum. The entire reproductive organs will be removed, identified as male or female, and weighed. A subsample of the tissue (~10 grams) will then be placed in a cassette and stored in Gilson s fluid. The cassettes will then be stored for further processing at (GCRL).

Literature Cited Comyns, B. H., J. Lyczkowski-Shultz, D.L. Neiland, C.A. Wilson. 1991. Reproduction of Red Drum, Sciaenops ocellatus, in the North central Gulf of Mexico: Seasonality and spawner biomass. Larval fish recruitment and research in the Americas: proceedings of the thirteenth annual fish conference, 21-26 May 1989, Merida, Mexico (Robert D. Hoyt, ed.). NOAA Technical Report NMFS 95. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council. 1987. Amendment number 1 and environmental assessment and supplemental regulatory impact review and initial regulatory flexibility analysis to the secretarial fishery management plan for the Red Drum fishery of the Gulf of Mexico. Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission. 2009. A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico Fishes. GSMFC. Publication 167 Haddon, M. 2010. Modelling and Quantitative Methods in Fisheries. Chapman & Hall/CRC, p 200. Linton, B. C. 2008. Recommended age compostion and mark-recapture study sample sizes for Gulf of Mexico Red Drum. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Sustainable Fisheries Division Contribution SFD-2008-018. Lohoefener, R., C. Roden, W. Hoggard, and K. Mullin. 1987. Distribution and relative abundance of near-surface schools of large Red Drum, Sciaenops ocellatus, in northern Gulf of Mexico and selected inland waters A pilot study. Technical report. Murphy, M.D., and J. Munyandorero. 2009. An assessment of the status of Red Drum in Florida waters through 2007. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, St. Petersburg, FL. IHR 2008-008. Murphy, M.D., and R.G. Taylor. 1990. Reproduction, growth and mortality of Red Drum Sciaenops ocellatus in Florida waters. Fishery Bulletin 88:531-542. National Marine Fisheries Service. 1986. National Oceans and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce, Secretarial Fishery Management Plan for the Red Drum Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico. Porch, C., M.R. Fisher, and L.W. McEachron. 2002. Estimating abundance from gillnet samples with application to Red Drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) in Texas bays. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture Science. 59:657-668.

Powers, S. P., C.L. Hightower, M.J. Drymon, and M.W. Johnson. 2012. Age composition and distribution of Red Drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) in offshore waters of the north central Gulf of Mexico: an evaluation of stock under a federal harvest moratorium. Seutin, G., B.N. White, and P.T. Boag. 1991. Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analyses. Canadian Journal of Zoology 69:82 90. Ute, J., K. Mintenbeck, T. Brey, R. Knust, and K. Beyer. 2005. Stable isotope food web studies: a case for standardized sample treatment. Marine Ecology Progressive Series 287:251-253.