New Seward and 36 th Avenue Intersection Conceptual Design

Similar documents
City of Prince Albert Statement of POLICY and PROCEDURE. Department: Public Works Policy No. 66. Section: Transportation Issued: July 14, 2014

DRAFT BUENA VISTA 2020 TRANSPORTATION PLAN

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

HIGHBURY AVENUE/HAMILTON ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE 1 MAY 14, 2015

Giles Run Connector Road

US 69 RELIEF ROUTE STUDY

Highway 217 Corridor Study. Phase I Overview Report

INNOVATIVE INTERSECTION DESIGN

HENDERSON DEVELOPMENT 213, 217, 221, 221 ½, 223 HENDERSON AVENUE and 65 TEMPLETON STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW.

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

Project Report. South Kirkwood Road Traffic Study. Meadows Place, TX October 9, 2015

Lyons Avenue/Dockweiler Road Extension Project Draft Environmental Impact Report. Appendix I Traffic Impact Study

Parks Highway: MP Lucus Road to Big Lake Road

CHAPTER 4: IDENTIFICATION OF ROAD SYSTEM DEFICIENCIES: TRANSPORTATION PLANNING MODEL

Wyldewood Estates. Pre-Application Public Engagement Summary of Issues and Responses

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

6.0 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES 6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 BICYCLE DEMAND AND SUITABILITY Bicycle Demand

Figure 1: Vicinity Map of the Study Area

List of Attachments. Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections...

SELECTED ROADWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS

Welcome! San Jose Avenue Open House August 25, 2015

Sixth Line Development - Transit Facilities Plan

WELCOME. Stakeholder Involvement Group Meeting #2 Round Lake Public Works October 24, 2018

Congestion Management Report

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. North Harrison Street (Lee Highway to Little Falls Road) Comparative Analysis. Prepared for:

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

RM 620 FEASIBILITY STUDY

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)

5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study

Bay to Bay Boulevard Complete Streets Project

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF CALEDON TRANSPORTATION NEEDS STUDY

Foothill Expressway Improvements Between El Monte and San Antonio

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station

Waterford Lakes Small Area Study

Moving Together Conference Complete Streets from the MassDOT District 5 Perspective

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY

Town of Bethlehem. Planning Assessment. Bethlehem Town Board

Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) Preliminary Responses to Madison-Miller Community List of Site-Specific Concerns

A CHANGING CITY. of Edmonton, it is essential that it reflects the long-term vision of the City.

Request for Proposals Contra Costa County Contra Costa Centre I 680/Treat Boulevard Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

NEW YORK CENTRAL PARK SUBDIVISION BLAIS STREET/ST-PIERRE STREET EMBRUN, ONTARIO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION, TENNESSEE PREPARED FOR: THE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION

Donahue Drive Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

Broadway Complete Streets Project

MARKHOUSE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS

Date: September 7, Project #: Re: Spaulding Youth Center Northfield, NH Property. Traffic Impact Study

Bikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

HAMILTON BIKING PLAN OUR VISION: A BIKE FRIENDLY CITY

Project Description Form 6V

Frequently Asked Questions

Staunton. Transportation Plan. Transportation Planning Division. Virginia Department of Transportation

SECTION 7 INVENTORY OF SELECTED INTERSECTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER STUDY

Summary: Mercer County Princeton Avenue & Spruce Street Study January 2009

2. Context. Existing framework. The context. The challenge. Transport Strategy

ARTINSVILLE ENRY OUNTY REA RANSPORTATION TUDY

o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents.

Classification Criteria

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio

SH-6 Corridor Improvement Study Policy Committee Progress Report M O N D AY, J U N E 1 0, B R A Z O S C E N T E R

TRASBURG RANSPORTATION

Elon Bicycle, Pedestrian and Lighting Plan. Pedestrian Rail Crossings Study

Magnolia Place. Traffic Impact Analysis. Prepared for: City of San Mateo. Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

CAPITOL DRIVE & FOND DU LAC AVENUE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS. Urban Planning 772 SARAH BREGANT, RYAN PETERSON, & MATT WERDERITCH

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

Evaluation of M-99 (Broad Street) Road Diet and Intersection Operational Investigation

Preliminary Transportation Analysis

Route 7 Corridor Study

Notes to Benefit-Cost Analysis

City of Wilsonville 5 th Street to Kinsman Road Extension Project

Reference number /VP. Lafayette Downtown Congestion Study - Additional Traffic Analysis

ARRENTON RANSPORTATION

Scarlett Road Bridge & Road Improvements Lambton Park Community School - Gymnasium Tuesday November 28 th, 2017

APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

MOUNTAIN HOUSE SPECIFIC PLAN I 9.1 INTRODUCTION ASSUMPTIONS TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PHASING 9.

Simulating Street-Running LRT Terminus Station Options in Dense Urban Environments Shaumik Pal, Rajat Parashar and Michael Meyer

2011 Capital Projects University Area - Community Council Priority List Municipality of Anchorage

North Coast Corridor:

Northbound San Jose Avenue & I-280 Off-Ramp Road Diet Pilot Project

LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 516 North Tejon Street Colorado Springs, CO (719) FAX (719)

Comments EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Transportation Corridor Studies: Summary of Recommendations

Draft North Industrial Area-Wide Traffic Plan

ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY

A plan for improved motor vehicle access on Railroad Avenue in Provincetown

Topics To Be Covered. Summarize Tier 2 Council Direction Discuss Mill and Ash Alternatives Next Steps

February 2018 HIGHWAY 316 IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

JONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY

APPENDIX E: Transportation Technical Report

Congestion Management Report

3.16 TRANSPORTATION, CIRCULATION, AND PARKING Regulatory Setting Environmental Setting ROADWAY SYSTEM

Balancing Operation & Safety for Motorized and Non-Motorized Traffic

Transcription:

University of Alaska Anchorage New Seward and 36 th Avenue Intersection Conceptual Design Prepared By: Zaid S. Hussein Dana Menendez Galen Jones Civil Engineering Department Prof. Osama Abaza CE A404 Highway Design May/ 2008 1 P a g e

Introduction: In the State of Alaska, the Municipality of Anchorage is the most populated first class borough in the state. The State of Alaska Department of Transportation or the Municipality of Anchorage owns the highways, streets, and roads. The Municipality of Anchorage maintains all of the traffic signals. Transportation within the city limits is an important part of the resident s daily life and is vital to the Anchorage economy. Local residents, as well as commuters from the Mat-Su Valley, trucks carrying freight, and visitors, travel the network of roads within the Anchorage Bowl, to commute to work, recreation, shopping, school and personal business destinations. As shown in figure A below. Figure A: Anchorage Residential Land Use, 1998 (Anchorage Bowl 2025 Long Range Transportation Plan with 2027 Revisions) 2 P a g e

The city is set up on a grid system with the New Seward Highway and Glenn Highway being the major freeway corridors north and south of the Anchorage Bowl. Passenger vehicles are the preferred method of transportation and comprise nearly 95 percent of the daily traffic including residents and commuters. The intersection of New Seward Highway and 36 th Avenue is located in midtown Anchorage and is a current source of congestion. The surrounding area consists of residential and business districts, two major universities, and two regional hospitals. One of the universities has a split campus with buildings on both sides the intersection. Business near the intersection consists of a hotel, an engineering company, a car dealer ship, some restaurants, and a bank. The residential area is located on the east side of the New Seward Highway. The Right-of-Way in this area is limited because of existing development. Although the universities and hospitals are not located directly on the intersection they constitute a significant portion of the attracted traffic uses at this intersection. With the variety of traffic generators and attractors this area is an essential part of Anchorage community. North bound traffic on the New Seward Highway approaching the intersection drops in speed from 65 miles per hour to 55 miles per hour; south bound traffic on the New Seward Highway approaching the intersection at 45 miles per hour. 36 th Avenue has a speed limit of 40 miles per hour. The New Seward Highway/36 th Avenue intersection is the first signalized intersection going northbound on the highway. The intersection is at grade. The alignment is at an angle of 70 to 75 degrees instead of the preferred 90 degrees. One block west of the New Seward Highway/36 th Avenue intersection is a second signalized intersection at the Old Seward Highway and 36 th Avenue that is located less than the recommended quarter-mile distance between signals. There is a public bus stop near the intersection of the New Seward Highway on 36 th Avenue. Congestion from this intersection during evening peak hour traffic creates stop-and-go traffic, signal delays, and causes traffic headed east on 36 th Avenue to back up. Drivers turning left from 36 th Avenue, to head south on the New Seward Highway, spill over into the trough lanes. This causes drivers to perform improper lane changes. Drivers that are distracted or traveling at unsafe speeds can cause accidents. With an increase in traffic accidents there is an increase in delay. This intersection in the year 2003 had the third largest number of accidents in the Anchorage area. Delay costs money in gas and employee time for freight and businesses, causes longer public transportation times, and contributes to air pollution. This project examines the current traffic conditions of this intersection and proposes a conceptual design of this intersection by analyzing short-term and long-term alternatives. The purpose of this analysis is to raise the level of service, design a safer intersection, and one that is more pedestrian and bike friendly. 3 P a g e

NO BUILD ALTERNATIVE 1.1 Introduction The conceptual design is focused on the New Seward Highway and 36 th Avenue intersection. In traveling this intersection during the evening peak hour there is noticeable delay of the left turn lanes on 36 th Avenue going onto the southbound New Seward Highway. The spillover from the vehicles turning left from 36th Avenue goes into the through lanes creating stop and go traffic. Significant congestion exists on eastbound through lanes that cause traffic to back into the intersection of Old Seward Highway and 36 th Avenue. The alignment of the intersection is not at a 90-degree angle; the intersection on Old Seward Highway is close, and three different speed limits are coming into the intersection. Please see overview map of Anchorage figure 1-1. Figure 1-1: Overview Map of Anchorage (Google Earth Map) 4 P a g e

TRAFFIC SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS 2.1 Introduction The traffic systems management analysis will look at short-term alternatives, with a design life of five years with an annual growth rate of traffic of 2%. This analysis will include changing of the geometry and traffic signal system. The alternatives will consist of changing the single phasing, the addition of lanes, and lifting one left turn from each side of the intersection and utilizing the other left turn lane as an additional through lane. Some of these alternatives could be implemented until a long-term solution can is completed. The anticipated outcome of this analysis is for a higher level of service for this intersection for a design life of five years. The Grade Separated 3.1 Introduction The last alternative in the conceptual design is a grade-separated intersection. The separation will utilize a depressed highway design for the New Seward Highway. This will improve the Anchorage traffic network by relived the congestion and remove the thought traffic from the New Seward off of 36 th Avenue. The will increase the capacity of this intersection as well as the surrounding intersections. The midtown area has several business and two universities. The intersection is vital to the area; two hospitals with emergency rooms are located off of 36 th Avenue and need to have the emergency vehicles able to reach them swiftly. A depressed interaction was considered because of the Plan Recommendations for the Highway-to-Highway connection in the Anchorage Bowl 2025 Long-Range Transportation Plan with Revisions for 2027 (LTRP). The LTRP s Highway-to- Highway is the connection of the New Seward Highway from the south and the Glenn Highway from the north. Currently a major arterial road connects the two highways. This connection will improve the capacity of the Anchorage network of transportation. 5 P a g e

3.4 Conclusion In the Analysis of this alternative there is a significant improvement on the LOST of the intersection. By removing the New Seward Highway s through traffic the safety is greatly improved. The traffic systems management analysis produced short-term alternative, which after 5 years returned to the current conditions. The grade separated intersections the only alternative to improve this intersection. With the alternatives produced the traffic systems management analysis the raised left turns will improve the LOS for a short period of time, however taking into consideration the cost of design and construction for the turns it is not a feasible alternative. Until the grade separated intersection can be installed emplaning the addition of lanes and traffic signal phasing changes could be used to relive some of the delay. 3.5 Recommendations: In consideration this design is conceptual design environmental, geotechnical, social and economical studies. Other studies of a design of roundabouts on the two intersection of the grade separated design and traffic flow studies would also be recommend. The design of guardrails and landscaping for the opened area between the 36 th Avenue and the U-Turns on the grade separated alternative to keep drivers from aborting the U-Turns. The New Seward Highway should conform to the Standards of design and construction set forth by The State of Alaska s Department of Transportation. The development of 36 th Avenue should comply with the Municipality of Anchorage Specification of Standards and AASHTO. 6 P a g e

Figure 1: Schematic Map for Lifting The Left Turn on 36 th Ave. and Adding One Through Traffic Lane Reduced Copy N.T.S 7 P a g e

Figure 2: Lifting The Left Turn on 36 th Ave. and Adding One Through Traffic Lane Reduced Copy N.T.S 8 P a g e

Figure 3: Schematic Map for The Grade Separated Intersection Reduced Copy N.T.S 9 P a g e

Figure 4: The Grade Separated Intersection Reduced Copy N.T.S 10 P a g e

11 P a g e