Complete Streets 101: Placemaking, Mobility and Parking

Similar documents
Beyond Congestion: Sex, Neuroscience, and Walkable Urbanism. Jeffrey Tumlin

Measuring Success: Performance Metrics and Project Selection

Balboa Area Transportation Demand Management

Ann Arbor Downtown Street Plan

Berkeley Strategic Transportation Plan A-76

The future of city streets: NACTO Urban Street Design Guide. November 19, 2013

Data Analysis February to March Identified safety needs from reported collisions and existing travel patterns.

BUILDING THE CASE FOR TRAVEL OPTIONS IN WASHING TON COUNTY. Image: Steve Morgan. Image: Steve Morgan

Data Analysis February to March Identified safety needs from reported collisions and existing travel patterns.

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

San Jose Transportation Policy

Community Task Force July 25, 2017

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

Town of Babylon Sustainable Complete Streets Policy

Existing Pedestrian Conditions. PSAC February 8, 2011

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

NACTO Designing Cities 2014 Dongho Chang, City Traffic Engineer October 23, 2014

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

Bellevue Downtown Association Downtown Bike Series

Monterey Road Complete Streets

3/11/15. NACTO Member CiBes. Santa Clara Valley San José Street Design Workshop. NaBonal AssociaBon of City TransportaBon Officials.

Complete Streets 101: The Basics

Making Phoenix Streets Complete. City of Phoenix Complete Streets Initiative

Speed Limits Study and Proposal. Public Input Session: 8/14/13

CHAPTER 7.0 IMPLEMENTATION

Data Analysis February to March 2018 Identified safety needs from reported collisions and existing travel patterns. SFMTA Board of

City of Jacksonville Mobility Fee Update

122 Avenue: 107 Street to Fort Road

Where We Live and Work Today

A CHANGING CITY. of Edmonton, it is essential that it reflects the long-term vision of the City.

Notes to Benefit-Cost Analysis

Martha Coello, Fairfax County DOT Jeffrey Hermann, Fairfax County DOT Abi Lerner, VDOT. May 19, 2014

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

Planning Guidance in the 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide

Telegraph Avenue Complete Streets DRAFT Recommendations. Oakland Public Works Department September 11 and 13, 2014 Open Houses

9/25/2018. Multi-Modal Level of Service (MMLOS) Bianca Popescu, Transportation Planner

El Paso County 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan

Capital Metro Downtown Multimodal Station

Memorandum. Fund Allocation Fund Programming Policy/Legislation Plan/Study Capital Project Oversight/Delivery Budget/Finance Contract/Agreement Other:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

Thank you for this opportunity to discuss with you how we can work together to make our streets more complete.

Public Works AGENDA ITEM D-2 STAFF REPORT

WELCOME. Purpose of the Open House. Update you on the project. Present a draft recommended plan. Receive your input

Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee

Oakland Pedestrian Master Plan Oakland Pedestrian Plan Draft Recommendations Chapter Outline

Purpose + Need. Connect: Thrive: Develop: < Strengthen the spine of our regional transportation system

395 Express Lanes Extension

Building Community Partnerships for Mobility:

SPEED MANAGEMENT FOR VISION ZERO

Better Market Street Project Update. Urban Forestry Council September 17, 2014

Complete Streets Workshop Follow-up. April 27, 2011 Rockledge City Hall

Attachment A: Columbus Area Metropolitan Transportation Plan Objectives, Performance Measures, and Targets

FOLSOM-HOWARD STREETSCAPE OVERVIEW

Transportation Assessment

Community Meeting February 27, 2007 Dorchester Avenue Transportation & Streetscape Improvements Action Plan February 27, 2007

Afeasibility study to evaluate bus rapid transit service in the East-West Corridor connecting major employment and activity centers between downtown

Development Review Program Annual Report 2016

Good TOD. July 7, 2016 SPUR

MCTC 2018 RTP SCS and Madera County RIFP Multi-Modal Project Eval Criteria GV13.xlsx

Transit-Driven Complete Streets

FINAL PLAN APPENDIX D CITY OF BERKELEY BIKE PLAN D-1

CONNECTIVITY PLAN. Adopted December 5, 2017 City of Virginia Beach

AGENDA ITEM G-2 Public Works

BID Strategy Group and Stakeholders Meeting. April 17, 2018

Ocean Park Boulevard Green Street Project Alternatives & Trade Offs


Balancing Operation & Safety for Motorized and Non-Motorized Traffic

Item to be Addressed Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Complete Streets Guidelines

THE ALAMEDA CONCEPT DESIGN COMMUNITY MEETING 3. A Plan for The Beautiful Way JANUARY 28, 2010

PEDALING FORWARD. A Glance at the SFMTA s Bike Program for SFMTA.COM

City of Wilsonville 5 th Street to Kinsman Road Extension Project

May 12, 2016 Metro Potential Ballot Measure Issue Brief: Local Return

Pedestrian Safety Workshop SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

Living Streets Policy

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

DOT Performance Measurement and Reporting System

City of Hamilton s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) Public Consultation 3 December 2015

TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Agenda Staff Report

Key objectives of the survey were to gain a better understanding of:

Southcote Road Improvements Class Environmental Assessment Study

I-105 Corridor Sustainability Study (CSS)

Performance Criteria for 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan

Regional Alternatives Analysis. Downtown Corridor Tier 2 Evaluation

Table #6 VISION CHARACTERISTICS

A Guide to Great Streets: The Basics. September 25, 2009

Seattle Transit Master Plan

MASONIC AVENUE STREET DESIGN STUDY Community Workshop 2. Masonic Ave Street Design Study Community Workshop 2 August 10, 2010

Community Task Force November 15, 2017

A Selection Approach for BRT Parking Lots Nicolls Road Corridor Parking Study

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

Bikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN

Uniting Cleveland through the Euclid Corridor Transportation Project

STONY PLAIN ROAD STREETSCAPE

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

Elmhurst Metra Station. Public Hearing Wednesday - November 30, 2016

Performance measures for nonmotorized

North Avenue Corridor Study

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

Transcription:

Complete Streets 101: Placemaking, Mobility and Parking April 16, 2016

Today s Agenda Welcome Complete Streets 101 Presentation Panel Discussion and Q & A Planning Process Next Steps Open House Summary and Recap Adjourn

Adeline (looking north) at Russell Adeline (looking north) at 62nd

Neighborhood Murals Existing Sidewalk Bulbout and Seating at Adeline and 62nd

Top: Activation of large sidewalk area at Adeline and Fairview for Adeline Pop-Up Event (June 2015) Left: Parklet seating area on North Shattuck

Complete Streets: 1. Principles 2. Performance Metrics 3. Parking

Streets Are Public Spaces Great Streets are Great for Businesses Streets Can Be Changed Design for Safety Streets are Ecosystems Act Now! Content: NACTO Urban Street Design Guide Trainings

Streets Are Public Spaces University City District

Great Streets are Great for Business Content: New York Measuring the Street NYC DOT

Content: New York Measuring the Street

Content: New York Measuring the Street

Streets can be Changed Content: NACTO Urban Street Design Guide Trainings City of Atlanta

Content: NACTO Urban Street Design Guide Trainings

Content: NACTO Urban Street Design Guide Trainings

Content: NACTO Urban Street Design Guide Trainings

Design for Safety Nelson\Nygaard

15 MPH

22 MPH

25 MPH

30 MPH

Speed vs Lane Width 9.8 10.6 11 12 13 14 15 (feet)

3 MPH Reduction in Speed = 15% fewer collisions 10% fewer pedestrian deaths 20% fewer pedestrian serious injuries

Content: NACTO Urban Street Design Guide Trainings Streets are Ecosystems

Urban Stormwater Issues Source: Puget Sound Partnership, 2012, Integrating LID into Local Codes: A Guidebook for Local Governments, prepared by AHBL for the Puget Sound Partnership, July 2012 Content: NACTO Urban Street Design Guide Trainings

Green Design Elements in Sustainable Streets Plazas - Rain Gardens Planter Strips Swales, Rain Gardens, Trees Curb Extensions Rain Gardens Linked Tree Wells/Curbed Planters Parking Lane Permeable Paving, Rain Gardens Source: www.annarbor.com Source: sfbetterstreets2.szfplanning.org Source: www.myballard.org Source: blog.g8-life.com Source: www.cityofberkeley.info on 04.12.13 Source: www.sfbetterstreets.org Source: www.blogspot.com on 3.7.2012 Source: www.extension.org Content: NACTO Urban Street Design Guide Trainings

Act Now! Content: NACTO Urban Street Design Guide Trainings

Performance Metrics

Old Speed Paradigm -> Roadway LOS Source: Reid Ewing

Level of Service A 32

Level of Service F Source: Neighborhoods.org 33

Level of Service F Source: Downtown San Jose Blog 34

What s important depends upon perspective Traffic engineer: Level of Service F Level of Service A Economist: A F 35

What Gets Measured Gets Done

What is transportation for? Transportation is not an end in itself It is merely a means by which we support individual and collective goals and objectives 37

Measure what matters Why not Consider Economic Development Job creation Real estate value increase Retail sales Quality of Life Access to jobs Access to shopping Residential property value impact Social Justice Do benefits accrue equitably? Are investments spread equitably? Ecological Sustainability VMT per capita (=CO 2, NO x, runoff, etc.) Land use/transportation connection

Portland Metro s 25 Evaluation Criteria Community Environment Economy Deliverability C1: Supportiveness of Existing Land Uses C2: Local Aspirations C3: Placemaking and Urban Form C4: Ridership Generators C5: Support of regional 2040 Growth Concept C6: Integration with Regional Transit System (Addressed in White Paper) C7: Integration with Other Road Uses C8: Congestion Avoidance Benefit C9: Equity Benefit C10: Health (Promotion of Physical Activity) C11: Safety and Security (Addressed in White Paper) C12: Housing + Transportation Affordability Benefit C13: Transportation Efficiency (User Travel Time Savings) EN1: Reduction in Emissions and Disturbance EN2: Risk of Natural Resource Disturbance EN3: Risk of 4(f) Resource Disturbance (Addressed in White Paper) EC1: Transportation Efficiency (Operator cost per rider) EC2: Transportation Efficiency (System annualized capital & operating cost per rider) EC3: Economic Competitiveness (Change in employment served) EC4: Rebuilding/ Redevelopment Opportunity (vacant and redevelopable land) D1: Total Project Capital Cost (Exclusive & Non- Exclusive ROW Options) D2: Capital Cost Per Mile (Exclusive & Non-Exclusive ROW Options) D3: Operating & Maintenance Cost D4: Total Corridor Ridership D5: Funding Potential

Portland: At-a-Glance Project Evaluation

Too much parking is worse than too little $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 Structured parking can cost more depending on location, e.g. $30,000 - $50,000/per space $30,000 $30,000 Thank you, Don Shoup!

Be Smart about Parking Smart meters Put customers first. 42

Set the Right Price 43

Unbundle Separate the price of parking from the price of rental and multifamily housing. Separate parking from commercial space leases and require parking cashout 44

Park Once School Shop P P P T T T T T T T T T T T T P P Play P Work

Mixed Use, Park Once District Shop Work School Play P T T Results: <½ the parking <½ the land area ¼ the arterial trips 1/6 th the arterial turning movements <¼ the vehicle miles traveled

Adeline Corridor Intercept Survey Summary Intercept Surveys April 5 (Tuesday) and April 10 (Sunday) Over 450 intercept surveys of merchants, visitors, and employees in Adeline Corridor planning area Preliminary Results When asked how they believe their patrons and employees access their place of business, merchants rank driving as the most common access mode by a long shot When visitors and employees were asked about their travel habits directly A majority (54%) of visitors either walk to use BART to access the Adeline Corridor study area; only 20% drive alone Almost half of employees commute by modes other than driving alone People who drive or carpool to the area spent about $53 on average/trip People who walk or bike spent $20-$30 on average/trip, but tend to visit the area more frequently than those who drive or carpool 47

For More Information Jeffrey Tumlin Mobility Accessibility Sustainability 116 New Montgomery St, Ste 500 San Francisco, CA 94103 Tel: 415-284-1544 jtumlin@nelsonnygaard.com www.nelsonnygaard.com

ADELINE CORRIDOR PLANNING PROCESS NEXT STEPS Second phase of work to create options based on community input from Phase 1 (Visioning) Some upcoming community events: Mobile IDEA Centers Ed Roberts Campus Wed. 5/4, Noon 2pm Malcolm X Elementary School Spring Fair Sat. 5/7, Noon 2pm Adeline Community Outreach Team (ACOT) Meeting South Berkeley Senior Center, Sat. 5/7, 10am Noon Community Workshop #2: Building A Plan Together: Options for the Adeline Corridor Saturday, 5/21, South Berkeley Senior Center 49

ADELINE CORRIDOR PLANNING PROCESS NEXT STEPS Even more events and ways to share your feedback to be announced soon www.cityofberkeley.info/adelinecorridor Call/email: Alisa Shen (510) 981.7409 or ashen@cityofberkeley.info 50

OPEN HOUSE: Information Stations City of Berkeley AC Transit BART Design your Adeline/South Shattuck 51

Street Design Element Examples: DIMENSIONS Separated bikeway: 6 bikeway + 3 buffer Bike lane: 6 Travel lane: 10 normal, 11 for bus Parking (parallel): 8 Tree well: ~5 Sidewalk: Typical minimum: 15 from curb to property line 52

Some questions for Adeline How to fit a bikeway? What shrinks to make way? Sidewalks: What s too wide? Too narrow? How do we make them feel active? Parking: How can we ensure availability for customers? Minimize spillover into neighborhoods? Accommodate employees? Loading and deliveries? What s the optimal supply and management? How do we balance auto capacity and pedestrian safety? What s the right speed for cars? How do we make the street transit-friendly? 53