Kraton Ultra-thin HMA / WMA Overlay Study

Similar documents
CONTRACTOR MIX DESIGN GUIDELINES ASPHALT CONCRETE

SUPERPAVE MIX DESIGN. Superpave Mix Design 1

Update on Performance of Thin Asphalt Overlays

BALANCED MIX DESIGN APPROACH. Robert Lee, P.E. Flexible Pavements Director

Project Update: Characterization of Alaskan Hot-Mix Asphalt containing RAP

Asphalt Mixture Quality Acceptance

9 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES

Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Quality Assurance

Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Quality Assurance

Using RAP in Asphalt Mixtures

Asphalt Mixture Quality Assurance

Asphalt Pavement Analyzer (APA) Evaluation

AGGREGATE INFORMATION

Calibration and Validation of the Shell Fatigue Model Using AC10 and AC14 Dense Graded Hot Mix Asphalt Fatigue Laboratory Data

Binder Modified with a Combination of PPA and SBS: The NCAT Test Track Experience PPA Workshop April 7, 2009

Separating Load from Moisture Effects in Wet Hamburg Wheel-Track Test

Full Depth Reclamation ALDOT FDR Requirements Lyndi D. Blackburn, PE

ADDENDUM REPORT. Project: Bid Package: 2 Current Let: 06/24/ :00 AM Version: Addendum Addendum : 1

BEST PRACTICE FOR COMPACTING WARM AND HOT MIX ASPHALT NEAUPG OCTOBER 7,2009

FINAL REPORT FOR NCHRP (375) Improvements to Dry-Back Procedure of AASHTO T 209. December 2017

Estimating Low Temperature PG-Grade of Binders in RAP without Extraction

RESISTANCE OF COMPACTED ASPHALT MIXTURE TO MOISTURE INDUCED DAMAGE (Kansas Test Method KT-56)

Chapter 37 Tex-241-F, Superpave Gyratory Compacting of Test Specimens of Bituminous Mixtures

IN-PLACE DENSITY OF BITUMINOUS MIXES USING THE NUCLEAR MOISTURE-DENSITY GAUGE FOP FOR WAQTC TM 8

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SUPERPAVE GYRATORY COMPACTED SPECIMENS WITH LINEAR KNEADING COMPACTED SLABS USING THE HAMBURG WHEEL-TRACKING DEVICE

OHD L-47. Guidelines for Resolving Differences in Test Results

Tex-207-F, Determining Density of Compacted Bituminous Mixtures

TexSys: Guide for Selecting HMA for Texas Flexible Pavements

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Development of a Fundamental Skid Resistance Asphalt Mix Design Procedure

EVALUATION OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT ANALYZER FOR HMA MIX DESIGN

Managing Density For Asphalt Pavement

Five Years Later. Illinois Asphalt Pavement Association Annual Meeting March 9, William J. Pine, P.E. Emulsicoat, Inc. / Heritage Research

OHD L-43 METHOD OF TEST FOR DETERMINING RUTTING SUSCEPTIBILITY USING THE ASPHALT PAVEMENT ANALYZER

HIR on Oklahoma Turnpikes

Using the Asphalt Pavement Analyzer to Assess Rutting Susceptibility of HMA Designed for High Tire Pressure Aircraft

COMPACTING SPECIMENS USING THE TEXAS GYRATORY COMPACTOR (TGC) PART I COMPACTING SPECIMENS USING THE TGC. Test Procedure for

Update on Latest Research

ASPHALT MIX DESIGN AND ANALYSIS TOWARDS IMPROVING COMPACTIBILITY OF WEARING COURSE MIXES IN THE WESTERN CAPE

Compaction Theory and Best Practices

PRECISION ESTIMATES OF AASHTO T324, HAMBURG WHEEL-TRACK TESTING OFCOMPACTED HOT MIX ASPHALT (HMA) APPENDICES FOR FINAL REPORT

ASPHALT PLANT LEVEL 1

Inspection and Acceptance of Asphalt Mix Design Laboratories

IMPROVING MIX DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF PERMEABLE FRICTION COURSE MIXTURES

Asphalt Pavement Analyzer Used to Assess Rutting Susceptibility of Hot-Mix Asphalt Designed for High Tire Pressure Aircraft

This study was initiated to address these performance issues. It focused on the following three topics:

Forensic Analysis of a 22-Year Old 35% RAP Interstate Project

Tex-206-F, Compacting Specimens Using the Texas Gyratory Compactor (TGC)

NCHRP Project Synthesis Topic Tack Coat Specifications, Materials, and Construction Practices

Forensice analysis of long term aged hot mix asphalt field cores containing reclaimed asphalt pavement

COMPACTING SPECIMENS USING THE TEXAS GYRATORY COMPACTOR (TGC) PART I COMPACTING SPECIMENS USING THE TGC. Test Procedure for

2014 PennDOT Gmm Verification Program

SPECIFICATION FOR REPEATED LOAD TRIAXIAL (RLT) TESTING FOR PAVEMENT MATERIALS

Warm Mix Asphalt in the United States: From Evolution to Revolution

Tex-207, Determining Density of Compacted Bituminous Mixtures

Illinois Center for Transportation

Use Part II for absorptive mixtures that have more than 2.0 percent water absorption.

Policy & Procedure Document Last Modified: 01/31/2012 Reviewed for Version:

DETERMINING OPTIMUM RESIDUAL ASPHALT CONTENT (RAC) FOR POLYMER-MODIFIED SLURRY SEAL (MICROSURFACING) MIXTURES

TxDOT Project : Material Design and Testing Methods for Home Made and Containerized Cold Mix

SUPERPAVE Construction Lessons Learned. NEAUPG Annual Meeting Wilkes-Barre, PA October 23, 2003

Low Traffic Volume LR 159 Low Traffic Preservation

Tack Coat Effect on Field Performance. February 3rd, 2015 NCAUPG/ICT Joint Meeting

BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND UNIT WEIGHT OF COMPACTED HOT MIX ASPHALT (HMA) (Kansas Test Method KT-15)

Mechanical Stabilisation for Permanent Roads

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 742 Department of Transportation October Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for

ASPHALT PLANT LEVEL 1

Aug 17, 2001 LAB MANUAL MAXIMUM SPECIFIC GRAVITY (RICE VOIDS TEST) OF PAVING MIXTURES AASHTO Designation T 209 (Mn/DOT Modified))

NCHRP Project 9-40 Update Optimization of Tack coat for HMA Placement

Test Method for Measurement of Stability and Resistance to Compaction, Vertical and Lateral Displacement of Multilayered Fine Aggregate Cold Mixes

WYDOT CONCRETE MIX DESIGN PROCEDURE

IN-PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE CONTENT OF SOIL AND SOIL- AGGREGATE BY NUCLEAR METHODS (SHALLOW DEPTH) FOP FOR AASHTO T 310

DETERMINING DENSITY OF COMPACTED BITUMINOUS MIXTURES

Method of Test for Sieve Analysis

Case Studies Using Falling Weight Deflectometer Data with Mechanistic Empirical Design and Analysis

TEST FOR STABILOMETER VALUE OF BITUMINOUS MIXTURES

IA ASPHALT EVAULATION PERFORMANCE EVAULATION

SCI/IAT/IHT Seminar Cases for and against hot mix road surfacings

DRAFT WSDOT PAVEMENT POLICY

Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION. Asphalt Update. Howie Moseley State Bituminous Materials Engineer

December 2017 Research Report: UCPRC-RR

Sept 23, 2014 LAB MANUAL

HCMTCB ASPHALT CERTIFICATION KEY ELEMENTS LIST

Apr 16, 2010 LAB MANUAL 1810

Jan 10, 2002 LAB MANUAL

TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING

Performance of Ultra-Thin Bounded Wearing Course (UTBWC) Surface Treatment on US-169 Princeton, Minnesota. Transportation Research

DETERMINING DENSITY OF COMPACTED BITUMINOUS MIXTURES

HCMTCB MATERIALS SAMPLING & TESTING PERFORMANCE CHECKLIST

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

T-24. A Practical Approach to Managing Density

Burns Cooley Dennis, Inc. Burns Cooley Dennis, Inc.

FINAL REPORT INVESTIGATION OF TEST METHODS, PAVEMENTS, AND LABORATORY DESIGN RELATED TO ASPHALT PERMEABILITY

Free Floating Screed. Screed Weight Forward Motion. Head of Material. Material Stability. Angle of Attack

Southeaster Pavement Preservation Partnership 2010 Update Welcome to Tennessee. Michael J. Doran, P.E. Maintenance Division

Research to the applicability of the ITS-R test as a ravelling indicator for SMA mixtures

Method of Test for Flat & Elongated Particles

Pavement and Asset Management from a City s Perspective Mike Rief, PE, DBIA and Andrea Azary, EIT. February 12, 2015

Stop Chasing & Start Managing Density

Transcription:

1 I. Overview Kraton Ultra-thin HMA / WMA Overlay Study Project: Oregon Department of Transportation I-5 Rock Point Evans Creek Contractor: Knife River Materials Existing Pavement - Condition: Binder Utilized: 70-22ERH (HiMA) & 70-22ER () Production Quantity: - Design ESALs: - Design Gyrations: 100 II. Mixture Designs (As submitted by the contractor) Table 1. Mixture Composition & 70-22ER Mixtures Percentage Percentage Stockpile - - - - - - - - - - - Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Table 2. Job Mix Formula Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (inch) HiMA & Job Mix Formula Polymer-Modified Thin Overlay (PMTOL) Specification PMTOL Specification Production Tolerance 12.5 1/2 100 100 ± 6 9.5 3/8 96.0 90-100 ± 6 4.75 No. 4 59.0 90 ± 6 2.36 No. 8 38.0 32-67 ± 4 1.18 No. 16 24.0 - - 0.600 No. 30 16.0 - - 0.300 No. 50 11.0 - - 0.150 No. 100 8.0 - - 0.075 No. 200 5.9 2-10 ± 1 Binder Content = 6.5% 6.5% min. ± 0.3

2 100 90 80 Percent Passing 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0.075 0.15 0.30 0.60 1.18 2.36 4.75 9.50 12.50 Sieve Size (mm) Figure 1: Oregon I-5 JMF Gradation III. Mixing and Compaction Temperatures Table 3. Oregon Mixing and Compaction Temperatures Binders Mixing Temperature Compaction Temperature PG70-22ERH & PG70-22ER 335ºF-324ºF (168ºC-162ºC) 312ºF - 304ºF (156ºC-151ºC) IV. Volumetric Verification Table 4. Laboratory Verification of Volumetric Properties Property HiMA 70-22ERH 70-22ER (AASHTO M323 Table 6) Air Voids, % 3.0% 2.9% 4.0% Voids in Mineral Aggregate (VMA), % 14.8% 14.7% 15.0% min. Voids Filled with Asphalt (VFA), % 79.8% 80.5% 65-75 Dust to Binder Ratio 1.2 1.1 0.6-1.2 Maximum Theoretical Specific Gravity G mm (AASHTO T209) 2.423 2.422 -

3 V. Binder Testing Section V Part A: Thermal Cracking Testing in accordance with AASHTO TP92 Determining the Cracking Temperatures of Asphalt Binder Using the Asphalt Binder Cracking Device (ABCD) Table 5. Thermal Cracking Temperature of the Asphalt Binder HiMA 70-22ERH 70-22ER Replicate 1 ºC ºC Replicate 2 ºC ºC Replicate 3 ºC ºC Replicate 4 ºC ºC Average ºC ºC Table 6. Thermal Cracking Temperature of the Extracted Binder from the Mixture HiMA 70-22ERH 70-22ER Replicate 1 ºC ºC Replicate 2 ºC ºC Replicate 3 ºC ºC Replicate 4 ºC ºC Average ºC ºC Section V Part B: Performance Grade Testing in accordance with AASHTO R29 Standard Practice for Grading or Verifying the Performance Grade (PG) of an Asphalt Binder. Table 7. Performance Grade of the Asphalt Binder HiMA 70-22ERH Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Continuous Grade PG Grade 70-22ER Continuous PG Grade Grade

4 VI. Mixture Performance Testing Section VI Part A: Thermal Cracking Testing in accordance with AASHTO TP10 Test Method for Thermal Stress Restrained Specimen Test. Table 8. TSRST Results Failure Temperature Load at Failure 1 6.92% -20.2ºC 6,981 N 2 7.38% -21.1ºC 6,590 N 3 7.41% -20.8ºC 7,146 N Average 7.24% -20.7ºC 6,906 N ±6ºC from the Low PMTOL - Temperature PG Specification Grade of Binder - 70-22ER Failure Temperature Load at Failure 1 6.56% -20.1ºC 7,449 N 2 7.30% -19.5ºC 7,304 N 3 7.31% -19.0ºC 7,075 N Average 7.06% -19.5ºC 7, 276 N ±6ºC from the Low PMTOL - Temperature PG Specification Grade of Binder - Test Notes: Cooling rate of 10ºC/hr utilized.

5 Section VI Part B: Cracking Testing in accordance with Texas Department of Transportation Test Designation Tex- 248-F Overlay Test. Table 9. Overlay Test Results OT Cycles to 93% Load Reduction 1 7.04% 10-2 6.70% 305-3 6.74% 10 - Average 6.83% 108 Mixture Incorporating RAP Shall Exhibit Cycles to Failure Within ± 10% of OT Results for Specimens without RAP* 70-22ER OT Cycles to 93% Load Reduction 1 6.82% 9-2 5.94% 10-3 6.13% 2 - Average 6.30% 7 Mixture Incorporating RAP Shall Exhibit Cycles to Failure Within ± 10% of OT Results for Specimens without RAP* Test Notes: Overlay test temperature of 15ºC (59ºF). OT testing completed in displacement control mode.

6 Section VI Part C: Fatigue Cracking Testing in accordance with AASHTO T 321 Determining the Fatigue Life of Compacted Hot-Mix Asphalt (HMA) Subjected to Repeated Flexural Bending. Table 10. Beam Fatigue Results N f (Number of Cycles to 50% Reduction in Modulus per AASHTO T321) 1 7.46% 30,998-2 7.56% 30,118 - Average 7.51% 30,558 100,000 cycles 70-22ER N f (Number of Cycles to 50% Reduction in Modulus per AASHTO T321) 1 7.72% 6,955-2 7.66% 11,619 - Average 7.69% 9,287 100,000 cycles Test Notes: Specimens tested at 750με and a test temperature of 15ºC (59ºF).

7 Section VI Part C1: Rutting Testing in accordance with AASHTO T 340 Determining the Rutting Susceptibility of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Using the Asphalt Pavement Analyzer (APA). Table 11. APA Rutting Results Average Air Voids, % Average Rut Depth (mm) 6.94% 2.83 mm Average Air Voids, % 70-22ER Average Rut Depth (mm) 6.92% 2.68 mm Test Notes: APA test temperature was 60ºC (140 ºF). Average Rut Depth 4 mm at 8,000 Loading Cycles Average Rut Depth 4 mm at 8,000 Loading Cycles Section VI Part C2: Rutting/Moisture Susceptibility Testing in accordance AASHTO T 324 Standard Method of Test for Hamburg Wheel- Track Testing of Compacted Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA). Table 12. Hamburg Wheel Tracking Device (HWTD) Results Air Voids Stripping Inflection Point (SIP) Average Rut Depth at 10,000 Cycles Average Rut Depth at 20,000 Cycles 7.95% NONE 0.58 mm 0.75 mm Air Voids Stripping Inflection Point (SIP) 70-22ER Average Rut Depth at 10,000 Cycles Average Rut Depth at 20,000 Cycles 7.68% NONE 0.70 mm 0.91 mm Test Notes: HWTD water temperature was 50ºC (122ºF).

8 0 Kraton Oregon - Hamburg Results December 2012-2 -4 Average Rut Depth (mm) -6-8 -10-12 -14-16 -18 Kraton OR HiMA Test Temperature: 50º C Stripping Inflection Point: NONE Rut Depth at 10,000: 0.58 mm Rut Depth at 20,000: 0.75 mm -20 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 Number of Passes Figure 2: Oregon Mixture HWTD Results 0 Kraton Oregon 70-22ER - Hamburg Results December 2012-2 -4 Average Rut Depth (mm) -6-8 -10-12 -14-16 -18 Kraton OR 70-22ER Test Temperature: 50º C Stripping Inflection Point: NONE Rut Depth at 10,000: 0.70 mm Rut Depth at 20,000: 0.91 mm -20 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 Number of Passes Figure 3: Oregon 70-22ER Mixture HWTD Results