SEAGRASS MAPPING FOR THE PENRHYN ESTUARY HABITAT ENHANCEMENT PLAN

Similar documents
Review of the current impacts of Dredge Spoil Islands and water circulation on adjacent seagrass beds Swansea Flats

Seagrass Surveys in Kampot

Beach profile surveys and morphological change, Otago Harbour entrance to Karitane May 2014 to June 2015

Longshore Bar Creation: a viable option for seagrass restoration?

Eelgrass and Macroalgae Presence/Absence Preliminary Surveys BHP Proposed Grays Harbor Potash Export Facility A Task 400

Nearshore Habitat Mapping in Puget Sound Using Side Scan Sonar and Underwater Video

Use of Conservation Moorings as a Component of Eelgrass Restoration in two Massachusetts Harbors

Effect of Boat Moorings on Seagrass Beds near Perth, Western Australia

Port Curtis and Rodds Bay seagrass and benthic macro-invertebrate community baseline survey

Repeat Monitoring of Seagrass Beds for Project Next Generation Autumn 2016

Seagrass habitat of Cairns Harbour and Trinity Inlet: December 2001

Significant Ecological Marine Area Assessment Sheet

Florida Seagrass Integrated Mapping and Monitoring Program

The Blue Heron Slough Conservation Bank

SA New Trial Artificial Reef Project

Stillwater Status Report: Lough Muck, County Donegal

IMPACTS OF RECREATIONAL BOATING ACTIVITIES ON THE SEAGRASS POSIDONIA IN SE AUSTRALIA. Ronald J. West

FOR INFORMATION ONLY. Gold Coast Seaway Channel Scour and Rock Wall Stability Investigation. R.B doc December 2011

GERALDTON NORTHERN BEACHES STABILISATION PROGRAMME (NBSP)

Port Curtis post oil spill seagrass assessment Gladstone - February 2006

Aim. Survey Methodology

Puget Sound Shorelines. Waves and coastal processes. Puget Sound shorelines: Effects of beach armoring

Relationships Between the Areas of Seagrass, Mangroves and Saltmarshes with Commercial Finfish Catch in various types of NSW Estuaries

Restoration of Eelgrass to Upper Casco Bay: Feasibility Tests in Hilary A. Neckles US Geological Survey Augusta, ME

Seagrass surveys must be conducted between the dates of April 1 st and October 31 st with the following exceptions:

Characterising the status of the Western Port recreational fishery in relation to biodiversity values: Phase 1 Greg Jenkins and Simon Conron

Certified Professionals in Hydrographic Solutions

Ecological Interactions in Coastal Marine Ecosystems: Rock Lobster

Eelgrass Survey Reporting Form 2222 Channel Road Newport Beach, CA Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Survey

Available from Deakin Research Online:

Alien Macroalgae Distribution and Management in Hawai i. Brian Hauk, Tony Montgomery, Sara Pelleteri

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)/ Mulberry Phosphate Trustee Council September 12, 2013

Available from Deakin Research Online:

SOCIETAL GOALS TO DETERMINE ECOSYSTEM HEALTH: A FISHERIES CASE STUDY IN GALVESTON BAY SYSTEM, TEXAS

# Post Consultation and Submissions Resource Consent Conditions for Surfing Impact Mitigation August 2016

Fifth otter survey of England

We would also like to thank Dr. Martin O Grady (CFB) and No. 3 Operational Wing, Irish Air Corps (Aer Chór na héireann) for the aerial photographs.

Seagrasses: Vital Habitat in Texas Estuaries

Impacts of breakwaters and training walls

Design and Construct Problems with Foreshore Beach and New Boat Ramp Observations - December 22 nd 2010 to 9 th January 2011

Zostera marina and Zostera japonica

Essential Fish Habitat OCNMS Advisory Council July 13, 2013

Estuary Care Foundation SA: community led restoration & climate adaptation

Underwater Videographic and Hydroacoustic Eelgrass Survey Chimacum/Irondale Beach Restoration Site September 12, 2006

Essential Fish Habitat Description White hake (Urophycis tenuis)

Ser Proposal By COMMENT JERSEY HARBOUR RESPONSE 1 Grève de Lecq harbour Limits Chris Le Boutillier President of Greve de Lecq

Stillwater Status Report: Lough Muck, County Tyrone

West Cliff Colliery Longwall Subsidence Management Plan Variation Reduction in Longwall 34 void length.

Available from Deakin Research Online:

Friends of Semiahmoo Bay Society Eelgrass Transplant Pilot Project May 6, 2007, Blackie Spit, Surrey, BC.

CMM Conservation and Management Measure for the Management of Bottom Fishing in the SPRFMO Convention Area

ACTION PLAN FOR AER DECISION PEMBINA PIPELINE CORPORATION APPLICATIONS FOR TWO PIPELINES - PIPELINE EXPANSION PROJECT, FOX CREEK TO NAMAO

Newport Trow Jonadab

Redondo Pier Alternate Site Activity

ADOPT-A-STREAM WATERSHED APPROACH COMMUNITY-BASED STEWARDSHIP. Nova Scotia Salmon Association March 2005

Pre and Post Dredging Coral Health Monitoring

Good Mooring to You! Jensen Beach Mooring Field. Kathy Fitzpatrick, P.E. Coastal Engineer, Martin County

Falmouth and St.Austell pspa bird bycatch analysis report year

Research Priorities of the SPC Oceanic Fisheries Programme. John Hampton Oceanic Fisheries Programme Secretariat of the Pacific Community

SMOOTH HAMMERHEAD SHARK (HHS)

FACT SHEET MCGREGOR LAKE RESTORATION HABITAT PROJECT POOL 10, UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER, WISCONSIN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Oceanic Society Reef Research Team: Nicole Crane, Avigdor Abelson, Peter Nelson, Giacomo Bernardi, Michelle Paddack, Kate Crosman

SARASOTA BAY ESTUARY PROGRAM OYSTER HABITAT MONITORING RESULTS: YEAR 1. Jay R. Leverone

April 7, Prepared for: The Caribbean Disaster Emergency Response Agency Prepared by: CEAC Solutions Co. Ltd.

Assessment of bow waves and propellar wash

Appendix A Photo Set

Into the Al Hajar with the Arabian Tahr 2012 FIELD REPORT

Cabbage Tree Basin Port Hacking, NSW

Eelgrass Survey PARADISE CAY BELVEDERE, MARIN COUNTY CALIFORNIA. Prepared For:

Part 9 Specific Land Uses - Foreshore & Waterway Development

Spatial Methods for Road Course Measurement

Essential Fish Habitat Description Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus)

Appendix G Whitewater Recreation Flow Study Plan

Warm-up # 7 A day 5/17 - B day 5/18 UPDATE YOUR TABLE OF CONTENTS

SHOREHAM BEACH LOCAL NATURE RESERVE

Wrecking barge Petrus

Planning of Major Recreational Boating Facilities at Shell Cove Boat Harbour

Feasibility Study for Restoration of Titlow Lagoon Fish Passage. South Puget Sound Salmon Enhancement Group

Lake Taneycomo Fisheries Management. Shane Bush : Fisheries Management Biologist

Estuarine Shoreline Stabilization

The Orkney Creel Fishery

Lake William Hovell. Recreation Guide

Potential limitations to the commercial fisheries and research surveys, caused by other users of the Polish Marine Areas

R & E Grant Application Biennium

Professor Jean Joss. Australian Lungfish Neoceratodus forsteri

Richards Bay Coal Terminal

Great Lakes Sea Duck Meeting: Project Summary and Focus Group Exercise Results July 2017 Winous Point Marsh Conservancy Port Clinton, Ohio

1.1 Berth Alignment Between Long Island Point and BlueScope Jetties

Water Framework Directive Fish Stock Survey of Transitional Waters in the South Western River Basin District Lough Gill

UPPER BEACH REPLENISHMENT PROJECT RELATED

Harbours, bays and estuaries. at the edges of land and sea

THE MANAGEMENT OF MANGROVES IN AN URBAN SITUATION ABSTRACT

We would also like to thank Dr. Martin O Grady (CFB) and No. 3 Operational Wing, Irish Air Corps (Aer Chór na héireann) for the aerial photographs.

Dr. Kim Peyton. (w/ some modifications by Dr. Bruland) University of Hawai i Mānoa

Context Most US West Coast open coast estuaries have: INTERTIDAL AQUACULTURE AS HABITAT IN PACIFIC NORTHWEST COASTAL ESTUARIES: CONSIDERING SCALE

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AUTHORITY JOINT STATEMENT OF EXPERTS IN THE FIELD OF MARINE MAMMALS

Visiting Lake Macquarie

Effective multi-agency collaboration improves spatial monitoring and planning in the Florida Keys

Changes in dominant species of seagrass bed off Iwakuni, Seto Inland Sea, Japan

Cindy Baker 2. Warrick Powrie 1 Dudley Bell 1

Transcription:

SEAGRASS MAPPING FOR THE PENRHYN ESTUARY HABITAT ENHANCEMENT PLAN PREPARED FOR SYDNEY PORTS CORPORATION By D. E. Roberts, S. R. Murray, G. R., Sainty August 2008

TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...3 METHODS...3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION...4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS...17 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...19 REFERENCES...19 APPENDICES...20 2

INTRODUCTION Sydney Ports Corporation has developed a monitoring programme for various components of the seagrass habitat associated with the Penrhyn Estuary Habitat Enhancement Plan (Maunsell, 2006). The seagrass monitoring plan was compiled by the Ecology Lab Pty Ltd (TEL), which detailed the requirements and methodology to be used for monitoring of seagrass associated with the expansion of the port (TEL, 2006). Part of this monitoring was to include seagrass mapping using the same techniques previously used to map seagrasses along Foreshore Beach (see Roberts et al., 2006). The aim of the seagrass mapping is to document changes in the seagrass habitat prior to the expansion of the port and to identify any seagrasses that may require transplanting prior to the commencement of construction works. METHODS The methods described here conform to the Seagrass Monitoring Plan produced by TEL (2006) using the same techniques outlined in Roberts et al. (2006; 2007). This was done to ensure that the seagrass maps produced were directly comparable to previous maps prepared for the project. Two seagrass maps were produced for this report. Seagrass mapping was done in November 2007 and again in May 2008. The most recent air photographs of the estuary were used for baselines to map the seagrass meadows. Since most of the seagrass meadows had disappeared, isolated patches of seagrass were marked with a float and their location, size and makeup were fixed and recorded using the D-GPS (see Appendices). The aerial photographs supplied by Sydney Ports Corporation (SPC) were imported into AutoCAD. Survey data were plotted over the aerial photographs. Colour maps were produced and areas of seagrass calculated using AutoCAD. Air photographs of the footprint of the port expansion and area to be dredged were also superimposed on the seagrass maps and the areas of seagrass to be directly impacted were also calculated for each time. 3

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The seagrass meadow along Foreshore Beach continues to be reduced since it was mapped in 2006 and 2007 (see Roberts et al., 2006, Roberts et al., 2007). Most of the Zostera capricorni that was recorded in 2006 had disappeared and the remaining shoots were quite sparse with covers generally ranging between 0-1%. This sparse coverage of seagrass occurred within the area that was previously mapped in 2006 (Roberts et al., 2006). The reason for the extensive loss of seagrass along Foreshore Beach is due to burial by sand. The source of the sand is most probably from erosion along Foreshore Beach. The cause of increased wave energy leading to this erosion is not known. Whilst there has been a complete loss of the functional seagrass meadow along Foreshore Beach, there are still small remnant patches of seagrass (see Roberts et al., 2007). These patches were identified and their size (in square metres) and the relative cover of the species present estimated. For the purpose of identifying and mapping the seagrass patches, the air photo was divided into a number of sheets for each time (see Fig. 1 & Fig. 6). Patches of seagrass were identified as Halophila ovalis, Zostera capricorni, Posidonia australis or as a mixed bed comprised of two or more of these species (see Figs. 2 4, Nov 2007; Figs. 7 10, May 2008). In November 2007, the total area of seagrass patches was calculated to be around 365 m 2. There was approximately 93 m 2 of Zostera capricorni and 43 m 2 of Posidonia australis (see Figs. 2 4) located within individual patches. Mixed patches of Zostera capricorni and Halophila ovalis were calculated to be around 217 m 2. Mixed patches of Zostera capricorni and Posidonia australis were calculated to be around 8 m 2, whilst mixed patches comprising all three species were calculated to be around 4 m 2 (Figs. 2 4). The extent of works (dredging, boat ramp, port and estuary enhancement) was overlayed on the November 2007 seagrass map (Fig. 5). At this time, it was calculated that approximately 331 m 2 of total seagrass would be directly impacted by the works. This included 93 m 2 of Zostera capricorni and 40 m 2 of Posidonia australis. 4

Approximately 195 m 2 of small mixed patches of Zostera capricorni and Halophila ovalis and 3 m 2 of Posidonia australis and Zostera capricorni (Fig. 5) were also located within the works area. In May 2008, the total area of seagrass patches was calculated to be around 352 m 2. There was approximately 86 m 2 of Zostera capricorni and 36 m 2 of Posidonia australis (see Figs. 7 10) located within individual patches. Mixed patches of Zostera capricorni and Halophila ovalis were calculated to be around 221 m 2. Mixed patches of Zostera capricorni and Posidonia australis were calculated to be around 5 m 2, whilst mixed patches comprising all three species were calculated to be around 4 m 2 (Figs. 7 10). The extent of works (dredging, boat ramp, port and estuary enhancement) was overlayed on the May 2008 seagrass map (Fig. 11). At this time, it was calculated that approximately 317 m 2 of total seagrass would be directly impacted by the works. This included 84 m 2 of Zostera capricorni and 26 m 2 of Posidonia australis. Approximately 207 m 2 of mixed patches of Zostera capricorni, Halophila ovalis and Posidonia australis (Fig. 11) were also located within the footprint. It is clear from these mapping exercises that there continues to be significant changes in the seagrass meadows along Foreshore Beach (see Roberts et al., 2006; Roberts et al., 2007). The total area of seagrass to be directly impacted by the works in 2006 was calculated to be 1.233 Ha, comprised of approximately 1.13 Ha of Zostera capricorni and an overlapping area of 0.9 Ha of Halophila ovalis. The seagrass monitoring plan outlined techniques and designs to sample seagrasses at small spatial scales, before, during and after construction (TEL, 2006). As a result of this mapping, the monitoring programme will need to be revised, as the TEL (2006) plan made the assumption that there would be more extensive seagrass meadows to be monitored. A monitoring site selection report was prepared (Roberts and Lincoln Smith, 2007) however, given the loss of seagrass along Foreshore Beach, this is now considered redundant. The revised monitoring plan should be discussed with DPI Fisheries. 5

Figure 1. Map sheet for seagrass patch mapping in November 2007. 6

Figure 2. Location of seagrass patches (western end of Foreshore Beach) in November 2007. 7

Figure 3. Location of seagrass patches (eastern end of Foreshore Beach) in November 2007. 8

Figure 4. Location of seagrass patches (outer Penrhyn Estuary) in November 2007. 9

Figure 5. Extent of works directly impacting on seagrasses in November 2007. 10

Figure 6. Map sheet for seagrass patch mapping in May 2008. 11

Figure 7. Location of seagrass patches (western end of Foreshore Beach) in May 2008. 12

Figure 8. Location of seagrass patches (eastern end of Foreshore Beach) in May 2008. 13

Figure 9. Location of seagrass patches (eastern end of Foreshore Beach and outer Penrhyn Estuary) in May 2008. 14

Figure 10. Location of seagrass patches (outer Penrhyn Estuary) in May 2008. 15

Figure 11. Extent of works directly impacting on seagrasses in May 2008. 16

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Total seagrass coverage in November 2007 was 365 m 2 comprised of: o Individual patches - 93 m 2 of Zostera capricorni and 43 m 2 of Posidonia australis. o Mixed patches - 217 m 2 of Zostera capricorni and Halophila ovalis. o Mixed patches 8 m 2 of Zostera capricorni and Posidonia australis. o Mixed patches 4 m 2 of all three species. As of November 2007, approximately 331 m 2 of seagrass were to be directly impacted by dredging and the expansion of the port, comprised of: o 93 m 2 of Zostera capricorni. o 40 m 2 of Posidonia australis. o 195 m 2 of mixed Zostera capricorni and Halophila ovalis. o 3 m 2 of mixed Zostera capricorni and Posidonia australis. Total seagrass coverage in May 2008 was 352 m 2 comprised of: o Individual patches - 86 m 2 of Zostera capricorni and 36 m 2 of Posidonia australis. o Mixed patches - 221 m 2 of Zostera capricorni and Halophila ovalis. o Mixed patches 5 m 2 of Zostera capricorni and Posidonia australis. o Mixed patches 4 m 2 of all three species. As of May 2008, approximately 317 m 2 of seagrass were to be directly impacted by dredging and the expansion of the port, comprised of: o 84 m 2 of Zostera capricorni. o 26 m 2 of Posidonia australis. o 202 m 2 of mixed Zostera capricorni and Halophila ovalis. o 5 m 2 of Zostera capricorni and Posidonia australis. Transplantation of the Posidonia australis (26 m 2 ) from within the dredge works area along Foreshore Beach and within Penrhyn Estuary will begin in early July 2008, just prior to port construction. 17

Summary of changes to total seagrass coverage (m 2 ) along Foreshore Beach and in Penrhyn Estuary through time. Species EIS 2003 Jan 2006 Feb 2007 Nov 2007 May 2008 Zostera (Z) 45500 192 93 86 Halophila (H) 38700 27 Posidonia (P) 14 45 43 36 Mixed Z+H 423 217 221 Mixed Z+P 8 5 Mixed Z+P+H 11 4 4 Total Coverage 96715 47114 698 365 352 Summary of changes to seagrass coverage (m 2 ) that will be directly impacted along Foreshore Beach and in Penrhyn Estuary through time. Species EIS 2003 Jan 2006 Feb 2007* Nov 2007 May 2008 Zostera (Z) 11300 192 93 84 Halophila (H) 9040 25 Posidonia (P) 14 39 40 26 Mixed Z+H 418 195 202 Mixed Z+P 3 5 Mixed Z+P+H Total Coverage 39453 12344 674 331 317 * does not include seagrass to be impacted by Penrhyn Estuary enhancement works 18

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We wish to thank Marika Calfas (SPC) for managerial support of the project and Ben Gray (SPC) for assistance in the field. Marcus Lincoln Smith and Peggy O Donnell (TEL) are thanked for technical advice on the project. REFERENCES Maunsell (2006). Vegetation Management Plan. Port Botany Expansion. Maunsell Australia Pty Ltd. Roberts, D. E., Lincoln Smith, M. P. (2007). Seagrass monitoring programme for the Penrhyn Estuary Habitat Enhancement Plan: selection of reference seagrass meadows. Report prepared for Sydney Ports Corporation. BIO-ANALYSIS Pty Ltd: Marine, Estuarine & Freshwater Ecology, Narara Roberts, D. E., Sainty, G. R., Murray, S. R. (2006). Saltmarsh and seagrass mapping associated with the Port Botany expansion. Report prepared for Sydney Ports Corporation., Narara and Sainty & Associates Pty Ltd, Potts Point. Roberts, D. E., Murray, S. R., Sainty, G. R. (2007). Seagrass mapping for the Penrhyn Estuary habitat enhancement plan. Report prepared for Sydney Ports Corporation., Narara. TEL (2006). Seagrass monitoring plan: Penrhyn Estuary Habitat Enhancement. Report to Maunsell Australia Pty Ltd. The Ecology Lab Pty Ltd, Brookvale. 19

APPENDICES 20

Appendix 1. Mapping data for November 2007. Works* No Eastings Northings Zostera Halophila Posidonia Area % % % M 2 Comment 1 333212 6241214 3 5 5 Mixed 2 No 2 333244 6241225 10 2 P No 3 333304 6241190 5 5 50 4 Mixed 3 No 4 333290 6241186 2 5 4 Mixed 1 No 5 333292 6241171 2 5 3 Mixed 1 No 6 333396 6241106 5 1 P No 7 333423 6241075 60 5 10 Mixed 1 No 8 333431 6241063 1 5 5 Mixed 1 No 9 333547 6241013 50 1 P Yes 10 333563 6240999 40 2 P Yes 11 333571 6240996 5 20 3 Mixed 2 Yes 12 333591 6241009 20 10 10 Mixed 1 Yes 13 333593 6240870 5 2 P Yes 14 333601 6240891 5 5 P Yes 15 333605 6240938 5 5 P Yes 16 333669 6240923 40 3 P Yes 17 333679 6240881 10 5 P Yes 18 333709 6240903 5 3 P Yes 19 333729 6240913 30 12 Z Yes 20 333743 6240886 10 4 P Yes 21 333761 6240874 5 1 P Yes 22 333865 6240785 30 4 P Yes 23 333859 6240774 15 4 P Yes 24 333978 6240801 50 6 Z Yes 25 334269 6240597 40 5 5 Mixed 1 Yes 26 334279 6240592 10 3 Z Yes 27 334294 6240581 90 20 Z Yes 28 334315 6240545 80 10 Z Yes 29 334336 6240582 1 1 Z Yes 30 334357 6240453 50 4 Z Yes 31 334361 6240424 5 2 Z Yes 32 334418 6240476 80 10 Z Yes 33 334429 6240391 60 5 180 Mixed 1 Yes 34 334441 6240387 20 1 P Yes 35 334389 6240310 50 25 Z Yes Total 365 Total Works Area Seagrass Zostera 93 Zostera 93 Posidonia 43 Posidonia 40 Mixed 1 217 Mixed 1 195 Mixed 2 8 Mixed 2 3 Mixed 3 4 Mixed 3 0 Total 365 Total 331 *No outside works area; Yes within works area. 21

Appendix 2. Mapping data for May 2008. Works* No Eastings Northings Zostera Halophila Posidonia Area % % % M 2 Comment 1 333212 6241214 5 5 P No 2 333244 6241225 30 4 P No 3 333304 6241190 20 5 50 4 Mixed 3 No 4 333290 6241186 2 2 4 Mixed 1 No 5 333363 6241120 15 2 Z No 6 333396 6241106 2 1 P No 7 333423 6241075 80 2 10 Mixed 1 No 8 333431 6241063 5 2 5 Mixed 1 No 9 333547 6241013 50 1 P Yes 10 333548 6241007 1 2 Z Yes 11 333563 6240999 1 20 40 3 Mixed 1 Yes 12 333571 6240996 80 5 5 Mixed 2 Yes 13 333591 6241009 40 2 7 Mixed 1 Yes 14 333593 6240870 1 2 P Yes 15 333669 6240923 5 3 P Yes 16 333679 6240881 1 5 P Yes 17 333729 6240913 80 1 12 Mixed 1 Yes 18 333743 6240886 5 4 P Yes 19 333761 6240874 1 1 P Yes 20 333865 6240785 30 4 P Yes 21 333859 6240774 15 4 P Yes 22 333978 6240801 80 6 Z Yes 23 334269 6240597 10 5 Z Yes 24 334294 6240581 90 20 Z Yes 25 334315 6240545 80 10 Z Yes 26 334345 6240576 80 1 P Yes 27 334357 6240453 90 4 Z Yes 28 334361 6240424 5 2 Z Yes 29 334418 6240476 80 10 Z Yes 30 334429 6240391 90 2 180 Mixed 1 Yes 31 334441 6240387 20 1 P Yes 32 334389 6240310 50 25 Z Yes Total 352 Total Works Area Seagrass Zostera 86 Zostera 84 Posidonia 36 Posidonia 26 Mixed 1 221 Mixed 1 202 Mixed 2 5 Mixed 2 5 Mixed 3 4 Mixed 3 0 Total 352 Total 317 *No outside works area; Yes within works area. 22