TITLE 5 SOIL EVALUATOR CERTIFICATION TRAINING 310 CMR CMR (3) DETERMINING HIGH GROUNDWATER ELEVATION

Similar documents
Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

J^tatldhcA. (Hnmmnnw?aii1j of ilaaaarijubrtta PAUL GUZZI COMPILED IN THE OFFICE OF (TERCENTENARY EDITION) CHAPTER 54, SECTION 133 GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS

Current DTA Caseload and Client Counts by Town and Zip -- Privacy Version

election Statistic* Commontoeattf) of juajsgacfjusetts JOHN F. X. DAVOREN JOV DOC * a4 HL\)t Compiled in Thb Office of Public Document No. 4.

1. The data below gives the eye colors of 20 students in a Statistics class. Make a frequency table for the data.

Response of a Newly Created Marsh-Wetland Affected by Tidal Forcing, Upland Discharge, and Groundwater Interaction

Healthy by Design. Planning & Development for Vibrant Communities. October 9, 2013 State House, Boston, MA. Sponsored by

WIND DATA REPORT. Mt. Tom

WIND DATA REPORT. Mt. Lincoln Pelham, MA

Shorelines Earth - Chapter 20 Stan Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College

ANNUAL EVALUATION OF 2016 WATER-LEVEL MONITORING DATA FROM THE CITY OF LAS CRUCES WATER SUPPLY WELLS, NEW MEXICO

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

Staying in Tune with South Florida s Water Cycle for Scientists, Managers, and Policy Makers in 5 Minutes per Week

Massasoit Chapter. Formed in 1940 Seventy-Four Years of Chapter History. Discover--Method--Record. January 2014

MIAA Ice Hockey Tournament (46th. Annual) 4th. Annual Division I North. Div. 1 North First Round

MBMG Butte Mine Flooding Monthly Report BMFOU Consent Decree BU-SEH Remedial Action Monitoring Program Contract No TO-35 September 2013

ANNUAL EVALUATION OF 2017 WATER LEVEL MONITORING DATA FROM THE CITY OF LAS CRUCES WATER SUPPLY WELLS, NEW MEXICO

Presented to Idaho Washington Aquifer Collaborative February 11, Spokane River Project License

WIND DATA REPORT. Bourne Water District

Developing Back Bay. Pre-Handout. Scope and Background

High School Dropouts Massachusetts Public Schools

Herring River Restoration Project Chronology of Key Events

Copies: Dave Favero Deputy Cleanup Manager Michigan RACER Trust. Rhonda Klann, MDEQ Amanda Armbruster, MDEQ John McCabe, MDEQ

News Release Northeastern Regional Field Office 4050 Crums Mill Road, Suite 203 Harrisburg, PA

Resources and Guidance for writing a River Herring Management Plan

FINAL WIND DATA REPORT. Mattapoisett Mattapoisett, Massachusetts

Tuesday, January 11, :11 AM (CST)

Beach Nourishment Impact on Beach Safety and Surfing in the North Reach of Brevard County, Florida

WIND DATA REPORT. Paxton, MA

Torrild - WindSIM Case study

ANNUAL EVALUATION OF 2015 WATER LEVEL MONITORING DATA FROM THE CITY OF LAS CRUCES WATER SUPPLY WELLS, NEW MEXICO

VENICE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM UPDATE: COASTAL HAZARDS WELCOME

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT. Mass Turnpike Authority Blandford, MA

ATLANTIC STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION. Winter Flounder Abundance and Biomass Indices from State Fishery-Independent Surveys

Fleet diversity and ownership concentration. Eric Thunberg, Chad Demarest, Andrew Kitts Social Science Branch, NEFSC June 12, 2013

LHA Name/Address Ch.200 Ch.705 Ch.667 Ch.167/689 MRVP AHVP

Lower Coquitlam River Project Water Use Plan. Temperature Monitoring Lower Coquitlam River Project Year 2 Report

Week of July 2 nd - July 6 th. The denominator is 0. Friday

Ocean Energy. Haley, Shane, Alston

Lecture Outlines PowerPoint. Chapter 15 Earth Science, 12e Tarbuck/Lutgens

N e w E n g l a n d L u x u r y C o a s t a l R e p o r t

Massasoit Chapter. Formed in 1940 Seventy-Three Years of Chapter History. Discover--Method--Record. October 2013

COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS. 454 lecture 12

MAR DASHBOARD MAR. Compliant % Breakdown Mar % Late % On-time MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

NEVADA SLOT MACHINES: HISTORICAL HOLD PERCENTAGE VARIATIONS ANNUAL AND MONTHLY HOLD PERCENTAGES, CENTER FOR GAMING RESEARCH, NOVEMBER 2017

NYS Coastal Waters. Water Resources of NYS: THE NATURE of the COASTAL ZONE. NYS Coastal Waters. NYS Coastal Atlas. Coastal Zone Management 10/10/2014

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT. Paxton, MA

CROSS-SHORE SEDIMENT PROCESSES

Table 1. Monthly precipitation totals from the on-site rain gage and from the Dulles weather station and their differences.

6 th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Puerto Varas, Chile, 9-14 September SC6-Doc17 The European Union s Annual Report Wójcik I.

Taranaki Tsunami Inundation Analysis. Prepared for Taranaki Civil Defence Emergency Management Group. Final Version

Hazardous Waste Operations & Emergency Response Training

Bathymetry Data Collection for Subaqueous Soil Mapping. Maggie Payne 2 nd National Workshop on Subaqueous Soils Rhode Island August 9-12, 2010

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission

APPENDIX F GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOGS

Draft Kivalina Wind Resource Report

SACO RIVER AND CAMP ELLIS BEACH SACO, MAINE SECTION 111 SHORE DAMAGE MITIGATION PROJECT APPENDIX F ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT

2005 DIVISION 1A TOURNAMENT

Ocean color data for Sardinella lemuru management in Bali Strait

Pitka s Point, Alaska Wind Resource Report

System Flexibility Indicators

Coquitlam/Buntzen Project Water Use Plan

WIND DATA REPORT. Mt. Tom

Investigation of the Impact of Beach Raking on Beach Accretion/Erosion: West End Beaches of Galveston Island, Texas 2007/ 2008

Drought: What is the Status?

Unit 4 Lesson 3 Earth s Tides. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company

Don Pool and Jeff Kennedy, USGS Brian Conway, Arizona Dept. Water Resources

Climatic Parameters Variability & Climate Change in Lebanon

Monitoring the length structure of commercial landings of albacore tuna during the fishing year

95 Express Annual Operations Report: Fiscal Year

July Interim Report. National Institute of Wind Energy (NIWE) Wind Resource Assessment & Offshore Unit Chennai, India.

Multi-Scaled Socio-Ecology of the Everglades FCE III Conceptual Framework

RESEARCH Massachusetts Recreational Boater Survey. Project Summary

MIAA Ice Hockey Tournament (57th. Annual) 9th. Annual Division 1A Super 8

WIND DATA REPORT. Mt. Tom

September 2017: Aspen Snowmass Real Estate Market Snapshot RELEASED 10/08/17 ON OR NEAR THE 1ST MONDAY EACH MONTH

Figure 1, Chart showing the location of the Breach at Old Inlet and sensors deployed in Great South Bay.

Managing and Adapting to Sea Level Rise in Egypt. Coastal Research Institute

Cape Cod Water Resources Restoration Project! Presented By:! Donald Liptack! USDA/NRCS District Conservationist!

CCoWS. Central Coast Watershed Studies. Summary of Precipitation and Streamflow for Potrero and San Clemente Creeks in 2010

Properties. terc.ucdavis.edu 8

RI Regulatory Setbacks & Buffers: Coastal Management Issues

CT EXPANSION PROJECT SILT FENCE DESIGN CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGY CONNECTICUT LOOP. Submitted by:..

LAB H - ATMOSPHERE AND CLIMATE LAB II STABILITY AND PRECIPITATION PATTERNS

A high-resolution cellulose δ 18 O record of Pinus merkusii from Cambodia and its climate implications

Site Description: Tower Site

WIND DATA REPORT. Bishop and Clerks

Current Status and Future. Hudson River American shad stock. New York State Dept. of Environmental Conservation

WIND DATA REPORT. Mass Turnpike Authority Blandford, MA

Maturity and Spawning of the Small Yellow Croaker, Larimichthys polyactis

Community Water Systems and Chapter 587

Chart Discussion: Fri-25-May-2018 Rainfall Last Week

Waters rise and fall in tides.

MILE POINT TRAINING WALL JACKSONVILLE, FL. Geotextile Tube Installation

TIDAL ANALYSIS AT KUALA LANGSA AND PUSONG ISLAND USING ADMIRALTY METHOD

Colorado River Drought Response and System Sustainability. Chuck Cullom July 16, 2014

Ocean Wave Forecasting at ECMWF

GONE! Coastal Erosion Happens During Storms! Why Worry About Coastal Setbacks? Goals for Today

Transcription:

TITLE 5 SOIL EVALUATOR CERTIFICATION TRAINING 310 CMR 15. 310 CMR 15.103(3) DETERMINING HIGH GROUNDWATER ELEVATION Prepared for: Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection By L.A. Spokas, PhD, Stockbridge School of Agriculture University of Massachusetts Amherst Presented by: New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission 310 CMR 15.103 (3) (a) - High Groundwater elevation shall be determined by: (a) soil color using the Munsell system, the abundance, size, and contrast of redoximorphic features, if present; (b) one or more of the following methods may be used to supplement the method in 310 CMR 15.103(3)(a) and shall be used when no redoximorphic features are present. 1. Observation of actual water table during times of annual high water table (typically March/April); Known as the wet season approach 2. The use of USGS wells for correlating comparisons in water tables during times when the water table is not at the annual high range

2. THE USE OF USGS WELLS FOR CORRELATING COMPARISONS IN WATER TABLES DURING TIMES WHEN THE WATER TABLE IS NOT AT THE ANNUAL HIGH RANGE; http://nwis.waterdata.usgs.gov/ma/nwis/current/?type=gw&group_key=county_cd Current Conditions for Massachusetts: Groundwater National Water Information System: Web Interface USGS Water Resources Data Category: Geographic Area: Current Conditions Massachusetts These wells are monitored monthly Barnstable County (11 wells) MA-FSW 239-0121 MA-CGW 138 CHATHAM, MA MA-SDW 253 SANDWICH, MA MA-SDW 527-0055 (90MW0063) MA-BHW 198 BOURNE, MA MA-SDW 526-0040 (MW-145S) MA-SDW 537-0107 SANDWICH, MA MA-SDW 525-0109 (MW-126S) MA-BMW 22 BREWSTER, MA MA-WNW 17 WELLFLEET, MA MA-TSW 89 TRURO, MA Berkshire County (2 wells) MA-SJW 58 SHEFFIELD, MA MA-PTW 51 PITTSFIELD, MA Bristol County ( 1 well) MA-SHW 275 SEEKONK, MA Essex County (3 wells) MA-WPW 76 WENHAM, MA MA-NIW 27 NEWBURY, MA MA-HLW 23 HAVERHILL, MA Hampden County (1 well) MA-GLW 6 GRANVILLE, MA Hampshire County (1 well) MA-PDW 23 PELHAM, MA Middlesex County (4 wells) MA-WKW 2 WAYLAND, MA MA-ACW 158 ACTON, MA MA-WAW 38 WAKEFIELD, MA MA-XMW 78 WILMINGTON, MA Norfolk County (4 wells) MA-NNW 27 NORFOLK, MA MA-LKW 14 LAKEVILLE, MA MA-PWW 22 PLYMOUTH, MA MA-D4W 79 DUXBURY, MA Worcester County (2 wells) MA-WSW 26 WEST BOYLSTON, MA MA-PHW 16 PETERSHAM, MA

Depth to Water level (ft. below grade) 12 14 16 18 20 22 USGS 2013 2014 2015 Green Line Historic Daily Mean Blue/red lines current date, shaded area historic range > 90 Percentile 76-90 25-75 10-24 < 10 Data Point Monthly median 3. A Department-approved method for determining inland high groundwater elevation as contained in Frimpter (1981) or Frimpter and Belfit (1992).

FRIMPTER METHOD An estimate of the high water level at an observation well may be derived by solving the proportion in which the ratio of the potential water level rise at a test site to the potential water level rise at an observation well is equal to the ratio of the water level range at the site to the historic water level range at an observation well in a similar geohydrologic environment. These Terms S h = S c Probable range at the site From Frimpter Graphs Observation well, current depth S r x (Ow c Ow max ) Ow r Observation well maximum high GW Observation Well range the Observation Well

Water-Level Range, In Feet Water-Level Range, In Feet SANDS AND GRAVELS IN VALLEY FLATS 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 A maximum water-level range of 4.2 feet is expected to be equaled or exceeded at about 5% of sites in sand and gravel in valley flats 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percentage of sites at which water-level range is equaled or exceeded SANDS AND GRAVELS ON TERRACES 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 A maximum water level range of 10 feet is expected to be equaled or exceeded at about 5% of sites in sand and gravel on terraces 2 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percentage of sites at which water-level range is equaled or exceeded

Water-Level Range, In Feet 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 TILL A maximum water level range of 17 feet is expected to be equaled or exceeded at about 5% of sites in till 2 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percentage of sites at which water-level range is equaled or exceeded RANGE OF WATER TABLE ELEVATION FOR A SITE WELL (SR) The Range of Water Table Elevation For a Site Well Will Be Based on the Hydrogeologic Setting of the Well and Will be One of Three Values For a 5% Exceedance Value Till Wells 17 Feet Sand and Gravel Wells on Terraces 10 Feet Sand and Gravel Wells in Valley Flats 4.2 Feet

ACTON (ACW) 158 (real-time data since June 2001) Start year of record - 1965 Land-surface elevation 153 ft, well depth 33.8 ft Lithology - SAND Topographic setting - TERRACE Period of record - HIGH (OWmax) 13.34 LOW 21.86 (OWr) 5.40 These Terms S h = S c 10 S r x Probable range at the site From Frimpter Graphs 17.64 (April 3, 2015) 13.34 (Ow c Ow max ) OW r 5.40 the Acton Well

Water-Level Range, In Feet ACW 158 MEAN DEPTH TO WATER DATE Jan 2015 Feb 2015 Mar 2015 Apr 2015 1 18.03 P 18.19 P 18.63 P 17.76 P 2 18.02 P 18.19 P 18.63 P 17.70 P 3 18.02 P 18.22 P 18.65 P 17.64 P 4 17.99 P 18.24 P 18.66 P 17.57 P 5 17.98 P 18.25 P 18.68 P 17.52 P 6 17.98 P 18.27 P 18.70 P 7 17.96 P 18.28 P 18.70 P 8 17.96 P 18.30 P 18.72 P 9 17.95 P 18.31 P 18.73 P 10 17.95 P 18.33 P 18.74 P 11 17.96 P 18.34 P 18.74 P 12 17.95 P 18.35 P 18.74 P 13 17.97 P 18.37 P 18.71 P 14 17.97 P 18.39 P 18.65 P 15 17.97 P 18.39 P 18.61 P 16 17.97 P 18.42 P 18.58 P 17 18.01 P 18.44 P 18.53 P 18 18.02 P 18.45 P 18.49 P 19 18.01 P 18.46 P 18.44 P 20 18.03 P 18.49 P 18.39 P COUNT 31 28 31 5 MAX 18.17 18.62 18.74 17.76 MIN 17.95 18.19 17.81 17.52 SANDS AND GRAVELS ON TERRACES 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 A maximum water level range of 10 feet is expected to be equaled or exceeded at about 5% of sites in sand and gravel on terraces 2 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percentage of sites at which water-level range is equaled or exceeded These Terms S h = 10 Probable range at the site From Frimpter Tables 10 x (17.64 13.34) 5.40 the Acton Well

These Terms S h = 10 10 x 4.3 5.40 the Acton Well These Terms S h = 10 7.96 S h = 2.03

These Terms S h = S c Observation well, current depth S r x (Ow c Ow max ) Ow r Observation well maximum high GW Probable range at the site From Frimpter Graphs Observation Well range the Observation Well WAKEFIELD (WAW) 38 (real-time data since July 2001) Start year of record - 1965 Land-surface elevation 80 ft, well depth 25.5 ft Lithology - SAND Topographic setting - FLAT Period of record - HIGH (OWmax) 2.92 LOW 9.99 (OWr) 6.33

Water-Level Range, In Feet WAW38 MEAN DEPTH TO WATER DATE Jan 2015 Feb 2015 Mar 2015 Apr 2015 1 5.71 P 6.54 P 6.99 P 5.29 P 2 5.79 P 6.54 P 6.99 P 5.33 P 3 5.86 P 6.59 P 7.01 P 5.28 P 4 5.39 P 6.61 P 6.98 P 5.19 P 5 5.24 P 6.62 P 6.96 P 5.25 P 6 5.62 P 6.64 P 6.97 P 5.33 P 7 5.56 P 6.65 P 6.95 P 5.38 P 8 5.71 P 6.67 P 6.94 P 5.43 P 9 5.79 P 6.69 P 6.90 P 5.36 P 10 5.89 P 6.71 P 6.70 P 5.28 P 11 5.96 P 6.72 P 6.16 P 5.34 P 12 5.99 P 6.73 P 5.60 P 5.46 P 13 6.04 P 6.76 P 5.74 P 5.51 P 14 6.08 P 6.76 P 5.69 P 5.55 P 15 6.11 P 6.77 P 5.18 P 5.61 P 16 6.14 P 6.81 P 5.18 P 5.67 P 17 6.21 P 6.82 P 5.18 P 5.68 P 18 6.22 P 6.84 P 5.15 P 5.73 P 19 6.18 P 6.85 P 5.34 P 5.79 P 20 6.23 P 6.88 P 5.49 P 5.76 P COUNT 31 28 31 30 MAX 6.51 6.99 7.01 5.96 MIN 5.24 6.54 4.89 5.19 SANDS AND GRAVELS IN VALLEY FLATS 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 A maximum water-level range of 4.2 feet is expected to be equaled or exceeded at about 5% of sites in sand and gravel in valley flats 1 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percentage of sites at which water-level range is equaled or exceeded These Terms S h = 10 4.2 x (5.76 2.92) 6.33 Probable range at the site From Frimpter Tables Water Level (April, 20 2015) the Wakefield Well

These Terms S h = 10 4.2 x 2.84 6.33 Probable range at the site From Frimpter Tables the Wakefield Well These Terms S h = 10 1.88 S h = 8.12 the Wakefield Well Site Maximum Site current Probable Range Observation Observation Observation on site well current well max well range Sh = Sc - [ Sr x ( Owc - Owmax) / Owr ] 7.8 10 2.75 17.64 13.34 5.4 8.4 10 2.75 17.64 13.34 7.3 6.6 10 2.75 20.00 13.34 5.4 7.5 10 2.75 20.00 13.34 7.3 9.8 12 2.75 17.64 13.34 5.4 8.8 11 2.75 17.64 13.34 5.4 7.8 10 2.75 17.64 13.34 5.4 6.8 9 2.75 17.64 13.34 5.4

4. A Department-approved method for determining coastal high groundwater elevation which incorporates tidal fluctuation information into use of historical high groundwater data as contained in Frimpter and Belfit (1992) or 5. If the location of the system is affected by tidal cycle, typically within 300 feet of mean high water of the ocean, monitoring the high groundwater elevation over a tidal cycle during a full moon high tide.