Pressure Vessel Calculation for Yavin Thruster

Similar documents
The Powerful Sealing Calculation

Design Review Agenda

Linear Compressor Suction Valve Optimization

An Innovative Solution for Water Bottling Using PET

FEA ANALYSIS OF PRESSURE VESSEL WITHDIFFERENT TYPE OF END CONNECTIONS

Investigation of Stresses in Ring Stiffened Circular Cylinder

Ammonia Synthesis with Aspen Plus V8.0

Finite Element Analysis of an Aluminium Bike Frame

1 PIPESYS Application

Iteration: while, for, do while, Reading Input with Sentinels and User-defined Functions

Design and Analysis of Pressure Safety Release Valve by using Finite Element Analysis

Experimental Verification of Integrated Pressure Suppression Systems in Fusion Reactors at In-Vessel Loss-of -Coolant Events

SEAWAT Viscosity and Pressure Effects. Objectives Learn how to simulate the effects of viscosity and how pressure impacts the fluid density in SEAWAT.

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF A COLD GAS PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR STABILIZATION

Tutorial on Flange Qualification using CAEPIPE

Incompressible Potential Flow. Panel Methods (3)

Automated Design-Based Compaction Criteria for Airport Pavements Using FAARFIELD

OPTIMIZATION OF SINGLE STAGE AXIAL FLOW COMPRESSOR FOR DIFFERENT ROTATIONAL SPEED USING CFD

Smart Card based application for IITK Swimming Pool management

INFLUENCE OF MEASURING PROCESS AUTOMATION ON UNCERTAINTY OF MASS STANDARD AND WEIGHTS CALIBRATION.

Investigation on Divergent Exit Curvature Effect on Nozzle Pressure Ratio of Supersonic Convergent Divergent Nozzle

Notice for Pressure Special Equipment Manufacture Licensing

ROSE-HULMAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering. Mini-project 3 Tennis ball launcher

Tokyo: Simulating Hyperpath-Based Vehicle Navigations and its Impact on Travel Time Reliability

Hermetic Compressor Manifold Analysis With the Use of the Finite Element Method

Lab # 03: Visualization of Shock Waves by using Schlieren Technique

Diagnosis of Fuel Evaporative System

CENTER PIVOT EVALUATION AND DESIGN

Research and optimization of intake restrictor for Formula SAE car engine

Workshop 1: Bubbly Flow in a Rectangular Bubble Column. Multiphase Flow Modeling In ANSYS CFX Release ANSYS, Inc. WS1-1 Release 14.

Electropneumatic Positioner Type 4763 Pneumatic Positioner Type 4765

End of Chapter Exercises

Queue analysis for the toll station of the Öresund fixed link. Pontus Matstoms *

Engineering Practice on Ice Propeller Strength Assessment Based on IACS Polar Ice Rule URI3

Analysis of Shear Lag in Steel Angle Connectors

Combination Analysis Tutorial

O-Calc Pro Sag Tension Calculations Explained

GMS 10.0 Tutorial SEAWAT Viscosity and Pressure Effects Examine the Effects of Pressure on Fluid Density with SEAWAT

CVEN Computer Applications in Engineering and Construction. Programming Assignment #4 Analysis of Wave Data Using Root-Finding Methods

Tresca s or Mises Yield Condition in Pressure Vessel Design

NCSS Statistical Software

"How To Make Amateur Rockets" Software Manual

Bottom End-Closure Design Optimization of DOT-39 Non-Refillable Refrigerant Cylinders

Development of Scroll Compressors for R410A

At each type of conflict location, the risk is affected by certain parameters:

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 3-81

Design and Analysis of an Unfired Pressure Vessel for Conducting Pressure Test

REASONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT

Fatigue Analysis of a LUG Assembly

Design of a High Efficiency Scroll Wrap Profile for Alternative Refrigerant R410A

ADVANCED. CATIA V5 Workbook. Knowledgeware and Workbenches. Release 16. Knowledgeware. Workbenches. Richard Cozzens. Southern Utah University

STUDY OF UNDERWATER THRUSTER (UT) FRONT COVER OF MSI300 AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLE (AUV) USING FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS (FEA)

Determination of the wind pressure distribution on the facade of the triangularly shaped high-rise building structure

Tension Cracks. Topics Covered. Tension crack boundaries Tension crack depth Query slice data Thrust line Sensitivity analysis.

2003 WJTA American Waterjet Conference August 17-19, 2003 Houston, Texas Paper PIPE THREADS-WHAT IS THE LIMIT?

Determination of the Design Load for Structural Safety Assessment against Gas Explosion in Offshore Topside

Modeling of Hydraulic Hose Paths

Design Project 2 Sizing of a Bicycle Chain Ring Bolt Set ENGR 0135 Sangyeop Lee November 16, 2016 Jordan Gittleman Noah Sargent Seth Strayer Desmond

Design and Optimization of Weld Neck Flange for Pressure Vessel

PREDICTION OF TOTAL PRESSURE CHARACTERISTICS IN THE SETTLING CHAMBER OF A SUPERSONIC BLOWDOWN WIND TUNNEL

Introduction to Roundabout Analysis Using ARCADY

A Computational Assessment of Gas Jets in a Bubbly Co-Flow 1

2.1 Introduction to pressure vessels

SIMULATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL FLIGHT CONDITIONS

σ = force / surface area force act upon In the image above, the surface area would be (Face height) * (Face width).

ISSN: Page 410

Design of a Solid Wall Transonic Wind Tunnel

(Refer Slide Time: 2:16)

End of Chapter Exercises

Electropneumatic Positioner and Pneumatic Positioner Type 3760 JIS

An Impeller Blade Analysis of Centrifugal Gas Compressor Using CFD

Aerodynamic Analyses of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine By Different Blade Airfoil Using Computer Program

ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Analysis of the 1497 MHz High-Current Cryomodule Helium Vessel

Lab 4: Root Locus Based Control Design

Advanced Applications in Naval Architecture Beyond the Prescriptions in Class Society Rules

ISO 2944 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Fluid power systems and components Nominal pressures. Transmissions hydrauliques et pneumatiques Pressions nominales

Using MATLAB with CANoe

Mechanical Anchoring Systems HDA Undercut Anchor Product description. HDA-P Undercut Anchor Pre-Set Type

Design and Analysis of Reactor Dish Vessel

Electropneumatic Positioner and Pneumatic Positioner Type 3760 JIS

Axial and Centrifugal Compressor Mean Line Flow Analysis Method

PVP Copyright 2009 by ASME

Chapter 14 Coal Boiler Flue Gas Scrubber II

5.1 Introduction. Learning Objectives

CHARACTERISTICS OF LEAK DETECTION BASED ON DIFERENTIAL PRESSURE MEASUREMENT

Data Sheet T 8389 EN. Series 3730 and 3731 Types , , , and. EXPERTplus Valve Diagnostic

4. Please Do Break the Crystal

Design and optimization of a low pressure vessel

CONVECTION SECTION FAILURE ANALYSIS AND FITNESS-FOR-SERVICE ASSESSMENT

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Fluid power systems O-rings Part 2: Housing dimensions for general applications

The Great Kayak Expedition

How to Optimize the Disposal System With Staggered Analysis Using BLOWDOWN Technology. Jump Start Guide

CFD SIMULATIONS OF GAS DISPERSION IN VENTILATED ROOMS

ISO 1977 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Conveyor chains, attachments and sprockets. Chaînes de manutention, plaques-attaches et roues dentées

OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY

Ranger Walking Initiation Stephanie Schneider 5/15/2012 Final Report for Cornell Ranger Research

Development of Large Capacity CO2 Scroll Compressor

Design and Safety Document for the Vacuum Windows of the NPDGamma Liquid Hydrogen Target at SNS

C1960. Multi-recipe profile recorder/controller. Measurement made easy

Verification and Validation Pathfinder

Transcription:

Pressure Vessel Calculation for Yavin Thruster J. Simmons June 16, 2015 1 Requirements The Pressure Vessel Calculation module is being created to model the stresses in the chamber wall for use in a sizing loop to determine the required wall thickness in the Yavin Thruster s chamber. The resulting wall thickness will be used to drive the chamber wall thickness parameter in the CadQuery model of the Yavin Thruster. This approach will give a CAD model that can parametrically size and generate geometry from the thruster s design variables and operating conditions. The key design variables driving the pressure vessel calculation include the chamber s inner radius, the yield strength of the selected chamber material, the desired factor of safety, and the chamber pressure. The key operating condition is the ambient pressure. The single result of running the pressure vessel calculation is the required wall thickness. Metric units will be used for all calculations and results. Table 1 lists all required variables and their units. Table 1: Pressure Vessel Calculation Parameters Direction Name Symbol Units Inputs Chamber Inner Radius r i m Yield Strength σ y MPa Chamber Pressure P c Pa Ambient Pressure P amb Pa Factor of Safety F S Outputs Chamber Wall Thickness t m 2 Theory A chamber is essentially a hollow cylinder with one end open to the propellant source (the injector face) and the other end converging to the opening where the thrust leaves the chamber to supply the thrust (the throat). There are two primary models available for analyzing the stress in the walls of a hollow cylinder under pressure: thin walled cylinders and thick walled cylinders. 1

The thin walled cylinder model, while simpler, is only valid for cylinders with radius-to-thickness ratios greater than 10. In order to support chamber geometries regardless of radius-to-thickness ratio the chamber is being modeled as a thick walled cylinder. The sizing loop will find the minimum wall thickness which yields a maximum stress in the chamber wall within the material s yield strength, including factor of safety. The stresses calculated during the sizing loop are the tangential and radial stress. Equation (1) shows the calculation for the tangential stress in a thick walled cylinder and Equation (2) shows the calculation for the radial stress in a thick walled cylinder [1]. σ t = p ir 2 i p or 2 o r 2 i r2 o(p o p i )/r 2 r 2 o r 2 i (1) σ r = p iri 2 p oro 2 + ri 2r2 o(p o p i )/r 2 ro 2 ri 2 (2) The equations above are in a generic form and can be applied to a number of design scenarios. Table 2 shows how the variables in Equation (1) and Equation (2) map to the parameters in Table 1. The variable r, the radius at the point of interest, bears some explanation. This variable determines where in the thick walled cylinder the stresses are being calculated. The pressure vessel calculation uses the maximum stress values to size the chamber wall thickness in a sizing loop. Therefore, the radius at the point of interest must be set to yield the maximum stress in the cylinder wall. For cylinders under tension (those with internal pressures greater than the external pressure like in the chamber wall), the point of highest stress is located at the inner radius. For cylinders under compression (those with external pressures greater than the internal pressure like submarines), the point of highest stress is located at the outer radius [2]. Table 2: Pressure Vessel Calculation Parameters Thick Walled Variable (units) Symbol Relation to Design Parameters Tangential Stress (Pa) σ t n/a Radial Stress (Pa) σ r n/a Internal Pressure (Pa) p i = P c External Pressure (Pa) p o = P amb Inside Radius (m) r i = r i Outside Radius (m) r o = r i + t Radius at the Point of Interest (m) r = r i 3 Implementation The Pressure Vessel Calculation module is implemented as a Python class (see Listing below) and is based on the structural jacket sizing module in the author s PhD research [3]. This section reviews the implementation line by line to provide a white box verification of the module. 2

The PressureVessel class has a constructor, a method to size the chamber wall thickness (calculate wall thickness), and three helper methods (sigma tan, sigma rad, and max stress). The class opens with its variable declarations in lines 20-28. The class variables map to the six calculation parameters in Table 1. The class has two additional variables used to maintain state during the solver routine and required as inputs for the tangential and radial stress calculations: the current guess for the outer radius and the radius at the point of interest. Finally, the class has a variable to control the step size used in the solver. The class constructor is implemented in lines 30-39. The constructor simply needs to assign values to the class variables. Note how the constructor requires a value for the thickness (t). This value is used as an initial guess for the wall thickness in the wall sizing loop. Most of the assignments in the constructor directly pass through the method arguments. However, the outer radius (line 33) and the radius at the point of interest (line 34) take on derived values based on the discussion above and shown in Table 2. 1 # Copyright (C) 2015 Mach 30 - http://www.mach30.org 2 # 3 # Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); 4 # you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. 5 # You may obtain a copy of the License at 6 # 7 # http://www.apache.org/licenses/license-2.0 8 9 # Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software 10 # distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, 11 # WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. 12 # See the License for the specific language governing permissions and 13 # limitations under the License. 14 15 import math 16 17 18 class PressureVessel: 19 # Variables used to calculate wall thickness 20 ri = None # inner radius, needs a value assigned 21 ro = None # outer radius, calculated from inner radius and thickness 3

22 r = None # radius of interest in the stress calculations, generally set to position of max stress (ri for tension, r0 for compression) 23 t = None # initial guess for thickness, needs value assigned 24 p_c = None # chamber pressure, needs value assigned 25 p_amb = None # ambient pressure, needs value assigned 26 material_strength = None # target maximum allowable strength (for example yield or ultimate), needs value assigned 27 fs = None # factor of safety 28 step_size = None 29 30 def init (self, ri, t, p_c, p_amb, material_strength, fs, step_size): 31 self.ri = ri 32 self.t = t # TODO: look at automatically selecting a guess, maybe based on thick-walled theory (ri/t >= 10) 33 self.ro = ri + t 34 self.r = ri 35 self.p_c = p_c 36 self.p_amb = p_amb 37 self.material_strength = material_strength 38 self.fs = fs 39 self.step_size = step_size 40 41 def calculate_wall_thickness(self): 42 """Solves for the desired wall thickness based on the inputs given""" 43 44 stress_limit = self.material_strength # TODO: Are these terms really interchangeable like this? 45 46 # TODO: Do we want to modify copies of ro and t to keep the originals for reference? 47 # TODO: The advantange of modifying the class variables is that you end up with a PressureVessel object with 48 # TODO: optimized ro and t values that you can access directly, such as pv.ro and pv.t 49 # TODO: Replace this solver process with something like a binary search 50 if self.max_stress() < stress_limit: 51 # Our vessel can handle more stress, so gradually decrease the thickness 4

52 while self.max_stress() < stress_limit: 53 self.t -= self.step_size 54 55 # The new thickness changes our outside radius 56 self.ro = self.ri + self.t 57 58 self.t += self.step_size # the while look exits after one too many steps, add one back 59 60 else: 61 # Our vessel can t handle the stress, gradually increase the thickness 62 while self.max_stress() > stress_limit: 63 self.t += self.step_size 64 65 # The new thickness changes our outside radius 66 self.ro = self.ri + self.t 67 68 return self.t 69 70 def sigma_tan(self): 71 """Calculate the tangential stress in thick walled cylinder""" 72 73 return (self.p_c * self.ri**2 - self.p_amb * self.ro**2 - self.ri**2 * self.ro**2 * 74 (self.p_amb - self.p_c) / self.r**2) / (self.ro**2 - self.ri**2) 75 76 def sigma_rad(self): 77 """Calculate the radial stress in thick walled cylinder""" 78 79 return (self.p_c * self.ri**2 - self.p_amb * self.ro**2 + self.ri**2 * self.ro**2 * 80 (self.p_amb - self.p_c) / self.r**2) / (self.ro**2 - self.ri**2) 81 82 def max_stress(self): 83 """Calculates the max stress including the factor of safety """ 84 85 return max(self.sigma_tan(), self.sigma_rad()) * self.fs The wall thickness sizing loop is implemented in the calculate wall thickness 5

methods (lines 41-68). The sizing method uses a simple incremental search to size the chamber wall thickness. This method tests the wall size for conformance to the objective, the minimum wall thickness which yields a maximum stress, including factor of safety, within material s yield strength, and then increments or decrements the wall thickness by a specified step size as needed until the objective is met. The method starts by defining the stress limit (equal to the material s yield strength) in line 44. The sizing loop is implemented in lines 50-66. The test in line 50 determines if the initial guess for the wall thickness is larger than needed (maximum stress is less than the stress limit indicating the wall is over sized) or less than needed (maximum stress is greater than the stress limit indicating the wall is undersized). In the first case, the while loop in lines 52-56 iteratively reduces the wall thickness (and outer radius) until the maximum stress is greater than or equal to the stress limit. Line 58 increments the wall thickness by one step increment since the loop above ran until the wall was one step too small. The second case (wall thickness is too small) is processed in lines 62-66. In this case, the while loop iteratively increases the wall thickness (and outer radius) until the maximum stress is less than or equal to the stress limit. No adjustment is required after this loop as the calculated wall size already yields a design where the maximum stress is less than or equal to the stress limit. The method concludes by returning the calculated wall thickness in line 68. The remaining methods are the three helper methods used to calculate the tangential stress, the radial stress, and the maximum stress including the factor of safety. The sigma tan method (lines 70-74) calculates the tangential stress using Equation (1). Visually comparing the source code in lines 73 and 74 to Equation (1) verifies this method is implemented correctly. Similarly, the sigma rad method (lines 76-80) calculates the radial stress using Equation (2). As before, visually comparing the source code in lines 79 and 80 to Equation (2) confirms it is implemented correctly. Finally, the max stress method (lines 82-85) calculates the maximum stress including the factor of safety by returning the product of the factor of safety and the maximum of the tangential and radial stresses for the current wall thickness. 4 Tests This section provides additional verification of the Pressure Vessel Calculation module in the form of nine test cases. The test cases come from data collected in the author s dissertation as part of a sensitivity study investigating the impact of material selection on structural jacket wall thickness (see Figure 1) [3]. Three test cases were selected from each of three materials (INCONEL 718, Alloy 188, Oxygen-Free Copper) to provide a range of material strengths, geometries, and chamber pressures. The following code demonstrates how the tests were conducted using the design point for the demonstration chamber CAD model. For each design point, a PressureVessel object is created, with the class variables set to values in- 6

Figure 1: Simulation Results from Dissertation Used to Derive Test Cases [3] cluding their units implemented using the Python Pint library. The calculate wall thickness method is then called to solve for the required wall thickness. from pressure_vessel_calcs import PressureVessel pv0 = PressureVessel(20.0e-3 * units.meter, 2e-3 * units.meter, 3.5e6 * units.pascal, 101325 * units.pascal, 40e6 * units.pascal, 2.0, 0.0001 * units.meter) pv0.calculate_wall_thickness() The results of the nine tests are shown the first nine rows of Table 3 (the final shows the results for the demonstration design point calculation above). Each row lists the input parameters for the corresponding test case, the calculated thickness (t calc ), and the thickness as reported in the author s dissertation (t). Note, the original analyses were calculated in US units. The original units were used to run the test cases and converted to the units shown in Table 3 to maintain consistency with the Yavin Thruster s use of metric units and to provide compact presentation. As can be seen in Table 3, the Pressure Vessel Calculation module passes all nine tests. For each test case the calculated wall thickness matches the thickness as reported in the author s dissertation. When combined with the white box verification in the previous section, these tests demonstrates the Pressure Vessel Calculation module correctly sizes the the wall thickness for the given design point. 7

Table 3: Pressure Vessel Calculation Test r i P c P amb σ y t calc t 133.1 mm 9192.7 kp a 0.0 kp a 1075.6 MP a 1.7 mm 1.7 mm 133.1 mm 29206.5 kp a 0.0 kp a 1075.6 MP a 5.5 mm 5.5 mm 242.4 mm 28443.4 kp a 0.0 kp a 1075.6 MP a 9.8 mm 9.8 mm 133.1 mm 9192.7 kp a 0.0 kp a 289.6 MP a 6.5 mm 6.5 mm 242.4 mm 17812.1 kp a 0.0 kp a 289.6 MP a 23.5 mm 23.5 mm 242.4 mm 28443.4 kp a 0.0 kp a 289.6 MP a 38.8 mm 38.8 mm 133.1 mm 9192.7 kp a 0.0 kp a 390.2 MP a 4.8 mm 4.8 mm 196.7 mm 30003.5 kp a 0.0 kp a 319.9 MP a 29.9 mm 29.9 mm 242.4 mm 17812.1 kp a 0.0 kp a 120.0 MP a 61.6 mm 61.6 mm 20.0 mm 3500.0 kp a 101.3 kp a 40.0 MP a 3.8 mm References [1] Shigley, J. and Mischke, C., Mechanical Engineering Design, McGraw-Hill, fifth edition ed., 1989. [2] Kharagpur, Thick cylinders Stresses due to internal and external pressures, Thin and thick cylinders, IIT, version 2, http://www.nptel.ac. in/courses/112105125/pdf/module-9\%20lesson-2.pdf. [3] Simmons, J. Design and Evaluation of Dual-Expander Aerospike Nozzle Upper-Stage Engine, PhD dissertation (http://www.dtic.mil/ get-tr-doc/pdf?ad=ada609649), Air Force Institute of Technology, 2014. 8