Mountain goat survey in the Shulaps Range, subzone 3-32C, Thompson region, British Columbia, July 2007
|
|
- Shona Gibbs
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Shulaps Range Mountain goat survey in the Shulaps Range, subzone 3-32C, Thompson region, British Columbia, July 2007 Prepared for: Doug Jury British Columbia Ministry of Environment Thompson Region 1259 Dalhousie Drive Kamloops, BC V2C 5Z5 Prepared by: Kim G. Poole 2305 Annable Road, Nelson BC V1L 6K4 Tele. (250) ; September 2007
2 ii ABSTRACT Mountain goats (Oreamnos americanus) are managed as a big game species in British Columbia, and as such, aerial surveys are conducted periodically to document population trend and productivity, and to establish hunting quotas. As a result of low hunter resident success and suspected declines in the population, a survey was conducted to determine the numbers and distribution of goats in subzone 3-32C in the Shulaps Range of the Chilcotin Ranges west of Lillooet in late July Standard survey techniques were followed using a Bell 206B helicopter. We used 5.0 hrs of helicopter time, including 4.2 hrs on survey, and surveyed a km 2 census zone of potential goat habitat under good survey conditions. Overall survey effort averaged 1.4 min/km 2. We observed 1 group of 10 goats (6 adults, 4 kids) in the headwaters of Bighorn Creek at 7,100 feet (2,170 m) elevation. A sightability correction was difficult to apply, but I suggest that the subzone s goat population numbers <30 40 animals, and may be as low as 20 goats. Five groups of California bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis californiana) totalling 34 animals were also observed (primarily ewes and young rams, with 2 lambs). The last complete summer survey within the subzone was conducted in 1991, when 69 goats were counted. The survey in 2007 covered almost all areas where goats have been observed in previous years, including the historic core area of use. It appears unlikely that we missed significant numbers of goats within the census zone. These results suggest that the population has declined considerably in the past 15 years. The causes of this decline are unknown; approximately animals were harvested in the subzone between 1988 and 2005, the bulk of them during the 1990s. Predation and disease may also factor in the decline. Based on the low numbers of goats estimated for the area, I suggest that hunting be eliminated until such point as the population is shown to be larger. Should funding and priorities permit, I suggest resurveying the subzone in 1 2 years to verify or refute the results we observed.
3 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT...ii INTRODUCTION...1 STUDY AREA...1 STUDY DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY...2 RESULTS...2 DISCUSSION...4 Population estimate...4 Management recommendations...4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...5 LITERATURE CITED...5
4 1 INTRODUCTION Mountain goats (Oreamnos americanus) are a high profile species in British Columbia, valued by hunters and non-hunter alike. Mountain goats are widespread in eastern and western sections of the Thompson Region (Region 3) of southern British Columbia (Shackleton 1999), with roughly 6% of the provincial total (Hatter 2005b). All goat hunting within the region is controlled on a permit system, based on estimated population size, with approximately 220 resident goat permits and 17 non-resident permits allocated annually. There is a perception of population declines across much of the region (Lemke 2005, D. Jury, Ministry of Environment [MoE], Kamloops, pers. comm.), but limited surveys have been conducted from the late 1980s to mid 2000s to substantiate this trend (Poole 2007a). Periodic surveys are required to update population estimates to ensure that harvests are sustainable. This survey focussed on subzone 3-32C in the Shulaps Range west of Lillooet and north of Carpenter Lake (Fig. 1). The impetus for the survey was very low resident harvest success and a suspicion that goat numbers were reduced in the area (D. Jury, MoE, Kamloops, pers. comm.). Survey data from this subzone are sparse. In a mid-august 1991 survey, 69 goats in 4 groups were observed within the subzone (MoE, Victoria, unpublished data). Five goats were observed during a reconnaissance flight for wildfires in early August 2000, and 13 goats were observed during a late February 2003 winter range survey (D. Jury, MoE, Kamloops, pers. comm.). Although 10 resident Limited Entry Hunting (LEH) permits are allocated annually within the subzone and resident interest for permits appears high (~7:1 first choice odds in recent years), only 1 goat was reported killed by residents from 1999 to 2005 (compulsory inspection reports, MoE, Victoria). Resident hunter effort within the subzone (i.e., whether a permitted hunter actually hunts) is unknown. Three non-resident permits are allocated to the one guide outfitter assigned the subzone for the current 5-year period (0.6 permits/year). The objectives of this survey were to determine the number and distribution of mountain goats within the subzone, and to compare survey results with historic data. Data obtained will be used to support current harvest management strategies. STUDY AREA The Shulaps study area is located in the Chilcotin Ranges of the Coast Mountains, in the dry climatic moisture regime of the (former) Kamloops Forest Region (Lloyd et al. 1990). Potential goat habitat in the study area primarily is made up of 2 biogeoclimatic zones: the Engelmann Spruce- Subalpine Fir (ESSF) zone and the Alpine Tundra (AT) zone above tree line. Tree line is generally located between 1,800 2,000 m (5,900 6,550 ft) (Lloyd et al. 1990). July and January mean temperatures for Lillooet, 20 km southeast of the study area, are 21.4ºC and 3.6ºC, respectively (Environment Canada climate normals, unpublished data). Lillooet receives an average of 330 mm of precipitation including 32 cm of snowfall annually. Climate varies within the study area, with cooler temperatures and deeper snowfalls at higher elevations and on north and east-facing slopes. High on the valley sides, hybrid white-engelmann spruce (Picea glauca x engelmannii) and subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa) dominate, with scattered stands of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) on drier sites (Lloyd et al. 1990, Parish et al. 1996). In the AT zone, conifers are present only in stunted krummholz forms. A census zone of potential goat habitat was surveyed, which generally included steep or cliff habitat above 6,000 6,500 feet (1,850 2,000 m) elevation and below tree line down to about 5,500 feet (1,675 m). (Feet are included as the unit of measure because the helicopter s altimeter was in feet).
5 2 STUDY DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY Study design and methodology generally followed RISC standards (RISC 2002, Poole 2007b), and consisted of a total count survey, with sightability correction subjectively applied afterwards. The study area was comparatively small, and thus the area was not divided into blocks. We began our survey at first light (5:55 am) and finished prior to noon. We used a Bell 206B Jet Ranger helicopter with pilot, navigator, and 2 observers. The helicopter was equipped with bubble windows in the rear, and wedge windows in the front. All occupants participated in locating mountain goats, and all had extensive experience at aerial surveys. We surveyed all alpine and open subalpine habitat, as well as areas of broken or disjointed cliffs and avalanche chutes below tree line down to about 6,000 feet. Some lower elevation slopes were also surveyed. We flew roughly m ( foot) contour lines at km/hr, m out from the hillsides. We rarely used >10 minutes between adjacent contour flights to minimize the potential for excessive vertical movements of goats between passes. We mapped approximate flight lines and survey coverage on 1:50,000 scale topographical maps and calculated the census zone based on the area surveyed. We also recorded broad habitat type, and elevation from the helicopter s altimeter (estimated to the nearest 100 feet). Goat locations and helicopter flight tracks were recorded with a hand-held global positioning system (GPS) unit, which was later downloaded to a computer. We classified goats only into kids and non-kid (yearlings and older; hereafter called adults) based on body size (Smith 1988) to reduce survey time, to minimize harassment (Côté 1996), and because researchers familiar with classification from aircraft agree more detailed age and sex classification is not reliable (Houston et al. 1986, Stevens and Houston 1989, Gonzalez-Voyer et al. 2001, S. Côté, Université de Sherbrooke, personal communication). Incidental wildlife sightings were also recorded. RESULTS We censused subzone 3-32C on 25 July Survey conditions and lighting were generally good with clear skies and calm winds. Temperatures within the census zone ranged from 4 8ºC at survey time. We used 5.0 hrs of helicopter time, including 4.2 hrs on survey, and surveyed a census zone of km 2. Survey intensity averaged 1.4 min/km 2. We observed 10 goats (6 adults, 4 kids) in 1 group in the Bighorn Creek drainage (Fig. 1), for an average observed density of 0.05 goats/km 2. Given the single goat group observed it is difficult to apply a sightability correction to this survey (Poole 2007b). Conservatively, I would guess that the subzone has <30 40 goats present, possibly as low as 20 animals. The goat group was observed at 7,100 feet (2,170 m) elevation in an area of broken cliffs several hundred metres below a ridgeline. The only other wildlife observed during the survey was 34 California bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis californiana) in 5 groups (Fig. 1). Only 2 lambs were seen among the ewes and young rams observed. Sheep groups occurred at 7,200 8,000 feet (2,200 2,450 m) elevation.
6 Figure 1. Location and number of mountain goats and California bighorn sheep observed during the survey of subzone 3-32C, 25 July The orange polygon approximates the census zone, which covers potential goat habitat. 3
7 4 DISCUSSION Population estimate Weather conditions during the survey were close to ideal. Hot weather earlier in July had been followed by a period of cooler and wetter weather, which had ended a couple of days prior to the survey Thus, we did not suspect that goats were hiding within treed areas in reaction to hot weather. Survey effort was similar to effort used for goat surveys in the Kootenay Region (Poole 2007b) and a recent survey in the North Thompson (Poole 2006), and the open habitat at higher elevations facilitated effective scans of the census zone. Although it is almost certain that we missed some animals, it is unlikely that we failed to detect a substantial number of goats within the census zone. With the exception of a single goat observed in August 2000, our survey coverage corresponded with all areas where goats have been sighted on past summer surveys. The goat group observed was centred in the area where historic survey data indicated the greatest number of animals have been present, the mountains between Jones, Bighorn, and Fall creeks to the south and Shulaps and Holbrook creeks to the north. Our survey effort was greatest within this area. Few tracks were observed during the survey, but where fresh tracks were observed on scree or on rare snow patches, they were invariably associated with bighorn sheep. Given the single goat group seen, it is difficult to reliably assign an estimate to the survey. I suspect that at the most fewer than goats may occur within the area, and the number may be as low as 20 animals. However, given the small number of goat groups likely present within the study area, missing 2 3 groups could have a substantial impact on the estimate for the area. Although we have no indication that this occurred, if significant numbers of goats were located outside of our census zone but within the subzone, then our estimate for the subzone will be biased low. No complete survey of the subzone has been conducted since 1991, when 69 goats were counted (group sizes were 1, 13, 22, and 33). Thirteen animals were observed during February 2002 winter range surveys, consistent with numbers observed during the current survey. It appears highly likely that the goat population within the subzone has declined substantially over the past decade and a half. Causes for this decline are unknown. According to compulsory inspection data, goats were harvested in the subzone between 1982 and 2005 (~1.0/yr; 4 F, 8 9 M), with 11 animals taken between 1990 and (Compulsory inspection data are difficult to reliably quantify at the subzone level because of management unit/subzone label and location issues; thus the uncertainty in the total number of goats harvested within 3-32C). Resident hunters took all but 1 2 of the goats harvested. Harvesting at this rate may have contributed to the decline, although predation and disease could have also played a factor. Although a small sample, the 4 kids in the group of 10 animals suggest that kid production is currently healthy. In summary, based on the observation of 10 goats within the historic summer range, I suggest that the goat population in the subzone numbers fewer than animals. However, based on our observation of only 1 group of goats, I have limited confidence in this estimate. Management recommendations Our survey indicates that the goat population likely numbers fewer than animals within subzone 3-32C. Based on currently Ministry of Environment recommendations on sustainable mountain goat hunting, populations of <50 animals should not be hunted (Hatter 2005a). Until there is evidence that more goats inhabit the subzone, I recommend that all resident and non-resident goat hunting be eliminated. In fairness to resident and non-resident hunters within the subzone, and if funding is available, it may be worthwhile to resurvey the area in 1 2 years to confirm or refute these results. I suggest that the
8 5 local outfitter(s) and knowledgeable residents be interviewed prior to the survey to ensure that all areas where goats are thought to occur are surveyed. Participation in the survey by an interested and experienced local resident or outfitter would enhance the value of the exercise in the eyes of users. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This survey was funded by British Columbia Ministry of Environment. S. Taylor, C C Helicopters Ltd., Lillooet, provided expert piloting. D. Jury and B. Butcher, BC Ministry of Environment were observers during the survey, and I thank them for their enthusiasm and assistance. Thanks to D. Jury for the opportunity to conduct this survey. D. Jury provided helpful comments on an earlier version of this report. LITERATURE CITED Côté, S.D Mountain goat responses to helicopter disturbance. Wildlife Society Bulletin 24: Gonzalez-Voyer, A., K.G. Smith, and M. Festa-Bianchet Efficiency of aerial surveys of mountain goats. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29: Hatter, I. 2005a. Guidelines for determining sustainable harvest of mountain goats. Presented at the 1st BC Mountain Goat Workshop, Prince George, BC, March Hatter, I. 2005b. Mountain goat status and inventory needs in British Columbia. Presented at the 1st BC Mountain Goat Workshop, Prince George, BC, March Houston, D.B., B.B. Moorhead, and R.W. Olson An aerial census of mountain goats in the Olympic Mountain Range, Washington. Northwest Scientist 60: Lemke, S Mountain goat population inventory, Thompson region, management units 3-43 and Ursus Ecological Consulting, Kamloops. Unpublished report for British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Kamloops, British Columbia. Lloyd, D., K. Angove, G. Hope, and C. Thompson A guide to site identification and interpretation for the Kamloops Forest Region. British Columbia Ministry of Forests Land Management Handbook no. 23, Victoria, British Columbia. Parish, R., R. Coupé, and D. Lloyd (Editors) Plants of southern interior British Columbia. Lone Pine Publishing, Vancouver, British Columbia. Poole, K.G Mountain goat survey in Management Unit 3-44, Thompson region, British Columbia, September Unpublished report for British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Kamloops, British Columbia. Poole, K.G. 2007a. A population review of mountain goats in the Thompson Region. Unpublished report for British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Kamloops, British Columbia. Poole, K.G. 2007b. Does survey effort influence sightability of mountain goats during aerial surveys? Wildlife Biology 13: RISC (Resources Information Standards Committee) Aerial-based inventory methods for selected ungulates: bison, mountain goat, mountain sheep, moose, elk, deer and caribou. Standards for components of British Columbia s biodiversity No. 32. Version 2.0. Resources Information Standards Committee, B.C. Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management, Victoria, British Columbia.
9 6 Shackleton, D Hoofed mammals of British Columbia. The Mammals of British Columbia, Volume 3, Royal British Columbia Museum. UBC Press, Vancouver, British Columbia. Smith, B.L Criteria for determining age and sex of American mountain goats in the field. Journal of Mammalogy 69: Stevens, V., and D.B. Houston Reliability of age determination of mountain goats. Wildlife Society Bulletin 17:72 74.
Mountain Goat Population Inventory Thompson Region Management Units 3-32 and July 18 20, 2005
Mountain Goat Population Inventory Thompson Region Management Units 3-32 and 3-33 July 18 2, 25 Prepared for: British Columbia Conservation Foundation Prepared by: S. L. Lemke, R.P. Bio. October 25 SUMMARY
More informationKootenay (Region 4) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions
1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Kills/100 hunter days Kootenay (Region 4) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions
More informationWhite-tailed Deer: A Review of the 2010 Provincially Coordinated Hunting Regulation
Population Estimate White-tailed Deer: A Review of the 21 Provincially Coordinated Hunting Regulation White-tailed deer in BC were managed using a combination of General Open Season (GOS) and Limited Entry
More information2009 Stone s Sheep / Caribou Inventory - MU 7-52
PEACE REGION TECHNICAL REPORT 2009 Stone s Sheep / Caribou Inventory - MU 7-52 by: Conrad Thiessen Wildlife Biologist Ministry of Environment 400 10003 110 th Avenue Fort St. John BC V1J 6M7 March 2009
More informationLITTLE SALMON AND MAGUNDY RIVERS
MOOSE SURVEY LITTLE SALMON AND MAGUNDY RIVERS LATE-WINTER 2007 Prepared by: Mark O'Donoghue February 2013 MOOSE SURVEY LITTLE SALMON AND MAGUNDY RIVERS LATE-WINTER 2007 Yukon Department of Environment
More information2010 Wildlife Management Unit 510 moose
2010 Wildlife Management Unit 510 moose Photo: Shevenell Webb Section Authors: Kristina Norstrom and Shevenell Webb Suggested Citation: Norstrom, K., and S. Webb. 2010. Wildlife Management Unit 510 moose.
More informationNEWS RELEASE. Harvest allocation ensures certainty for hunting sector
For Immediate Release 2015FLNR0009-000152 February 6, 2015 NEWS RELEASE Harvest allocation ensures certainty for hunting sector VICTORIA Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations Minister Steve Thomson
More informationAgriculture Zone Winter Replicate Count 2007/08
PEACE REGION TECHNICAL REPORT Agriculture Zone Winter Replicate Count 2007/08 by: Conrad Thiessen Wildlife Biologist Ministry of Environment 400 10003 110 th Avenue Fort St. John BC V1J 6M7 November 2008
More informationMAYO MOOSE MANAGEMENT UNIT
MOOSE SURVEY MAYO MOOSE MANAGEMENT UNIT LATE-WINTER 2014 Prepared by: Mark O'Donoghue, Joe Bellmore, Sophie Czetwertynski and Susan Westover July 2016 MOOSE SURVEY MAYO MOOSE MANAGEMENT UNIT LATE-WINTER
More informationKootenay Mule Deer Composition Surveys:
: Winter 2010 Patrick Stent Ministry of Natural Resource Operations Nelson BC March 2011 Executive Summary The Ministry of Natural Resource Operations (MNRO) introduced a 30 day any-buck general open season
More informationMOOSE SURVEY RACKLA AREA LATE-WINTER Prepared by: Mark O'Donoghue, Joe Bellmore, Sophie Czetwertynski and Susan Westover
MOOSE SURVEY RACKLA AREA LATE-WINTER 2013 Prepared by: Mark O'Donoghue, Joe Bellmore, Sophie Czetwertynski and Susan Westover October 2013 MOOSE SURVEY RACKLA AREA LATE-WINTER 2013 Yukon Department of
More information2009 WMU 328 Moose and Elk
2009 WMU 328 Moose and Elk Section Authors: Anne Hubbs and Shevenell Webb Suggested Citation: Hubbs, A. and S. Webb. 2009. WMU 328 Moose and Elk. Pages 40 44. In: N. Webb and R. Anderson. Delegated aerial
More information2008 WMU 359 moose, mule deer, and white tailed deer
2008 WMU 359 moose, mule deer, and white tailed deer Section Authors: Dave Stepnisky and Robb Stavne Suggested citation: Stepnisky, D. and R. Stavne. 2009. WMU 359 moose, mule deer, and white tailed deer.
More information2017 LATE WINTER CLASSIFICATION OF NORTHERN YELLOWSTONE ELK
2017 LATE WINTER CLASSIFICATION OF NORTHERN YELLOWSTONE ELK A collaborative survey by the Northern Yellowstone Cooperative Wildlife Working Group Report Prepared by: Karen Loveless, Montana Fish Wildlife
More informationBIG GAME INVENTORY FUND Annual Report 2014/15
BIG GAME INVENTORY FUND Annual Report 2014/15 Photo credit: Jerry MacDermott BC Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations Fish and Wildlife Branch October 30, 2015 1 BIG GAME INVENTORY
More information1) Increase the deer population to 475,000 (mule, 150,000;
British Columbia Deer Status Report forthe 1987 Western ~ tates~cinces Deer workshop - 1. Attending Representative: Ian Hatter Wildlife Branch Ministry of Environment and Parks Victoria, British Columbia
More information2010 Wildlife Management Unit 501 moose and deer
2010 Wildlife Management Unit 501 moose and deer Section Authors: Barb Maile and Velma Hudson Suggested Citation: Maile, B., and V. Hudson. 2010. Wildlife Management Unit 501 moose and deer. Pages 73 77.
More informationMOUNTAIN CARIBOU INTERACTIONS WITH WOLVES AND MOOSE IN CENTRAL BRITISH COLUMBIA
MOUNTAIN CARIBOU INTERACTIONS WITH WOLVES AND MOOSE IN CENTRAL BRITISH COLUMBIA Dale R. Seip British Columbia Ministry of Forests and Range, 1011 Fourth Ave., Prince George, B.C. V2L 3H9, Canada, e-mail:
More information2009 WMU 527 Moose, Mule Deer, and White tailed Deer
Section Author: Dave Moyles 2009 WMU 527 Moose, Mule Deer, and White tailed Deer Suggested Citation: Moyle, D. 2009. WMU 527 Moose, Mule Deer, and White tailed Deer. Pages 84 88 In: N. Webb and R. Anderson.
More informationMoose Management in the Peace Region
Moose Management in the Peace Region February 28 Prepared for: BC Ministry of Environment Environmental Stewardship Prepared by: Michael Rowe Canadensis Wildlife Consulting Peace Region Status of Moose
More informationOkanagan Mountain Park Bighorn Transplant Monitoring
Okanagan Mountain Park Bighorn Transplant Monitoring Prepared by: Aaron Reid Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations Fish and Wildlife Section Penticton, BC July 2012 Funding provided
More information2008 WMU 360 moose, white tailed deer and mule deer. Section Authors: Robb Stavne, Dave Stepnisky and Mark Heckbert
2008 WMU 360 moose, white tailed deer and mule deer Section Authors: Robb Stavne, Dave Stepnisky and Mark Heckbert Suggested citation: Stavne, R., D. Stepnisky, and M. Heckbert. 2009. WMU 360 moose, white
More informationNalcor Energy Lower Churchill Project, Environmental Effects Monitoring Program 2017 Red Wine Mountains Herd (RWMH) Caribou
Nalcor Energy Lower Churchill Project, Environmental Effects Monitoring Program 2017 Red Wine Mountains Herd (RWMH) Caribou 2017 Aerial Survey Prepared for: Nalcor Energy Hydro Place, 500 Columbus Drive
More information2010 Wildlife Management Unit 536 moose
2010 Wildlife Management Unit 536 moose Photo: Nathan Carruthers Section Author: Dave Moyles Suggested Citation: Moyles, D. 2010. Wildlife Management Unit 536 moose. Pages 84 88. In: M. Ranger and S. Webb.
More information2010 Mountain Caribou Census CENTRAL SELKIRK MOUNTAINS
2010 Mountain Caribou Census CENTRAL SELKIRK MOUNTAINS Leo DeGroot British Columbia Ministry of Environment Final Report May 2010 FIA Project 9100002 Summary We conducted a complete census of the two sub
More informationMAYO MOOSE MANAGEMENT UNIT
MOOSE SURVEY MAYO MOOSE MANAGEMENT UNIT EARLY-WINTER 2011 Prepared by: Mark O'Donoghue, Joe Bellmore, Rick Ward & Susan Westover December 2012 MOOSE SURVEY MAYO MOOSE MANAGEMENT UNIT EARLY-WINTER 2011
More informationThompson Moose Composition Surveys
Thompson Moose Composition Surveys Management Units: 3-28, 3-31, 3-36, 3-42 Winter 2013 Prepared by: Francis Iredale, R.P.Bio & Chris Procter, R.P.Bio Fish & Wildlife Ministry of Forests, Lands & Natural
More informationMinistry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations
For Immediate Release 2015FLNR0004-000035 January 15, 2015 INFORMATION BULLETIN Government acting to save endangered caribou VICTORIA - The Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations is
More informationPROCEDURE MANUAL of 6. Moose Harvest Management. This Procedure Replaces: None
4 7 01.07.3 1 of 6 This Procedure Replaces: None Staff, Organizations Directly Affected: Director Regional Managers Wildlife Management Staff First Nations Resident Hunters Guide Outfitters Policy Cross-Reference:
More informationMountain Caribou Recovery Implementation Plan. Predator/Prey Component. Terms of Reference
Mountain Caribou Recovery Implementation Plan Predator/Prey Component Terms of Reference These Terms of Reference (ToR) support the October 2007 BC Mountain Caribou Recovery Implementation Plan. They are
More informationNorth Thompson Moose Distribution And Classification Surveys Winter 2005
North Thompson Moose Distribution And Classification Surveys Winter 2005 Prepared for: British Columbia Conservation Foundation Surrey, BC August 2005 Prepared by: S. L. Lemke North Thompson MooseClassification
More informationNorthern Yellowstone Cooperative Wildlife Working Group 2012 Annual Report (October 1, 2012-September 30, 2012) Member Agencies
Northern Yellowstone Cooperative Wildlife Working Group 2012 Annual Report (October 1, 2012-September 30, 2012) Member Agencies Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks National Park Service, Yellowstone National
More informationJob Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion
Job Title:, Subsection B Goal: Manage the mountain lion population, its numbers and distribution, as an important part of Arizona s fauna and to provide mountain lion hunting recreation opportunity while
More information2008 WMU 106 mule deer
2008 WMU 106 mule deer Section Authors: Mike Grue and Kim Morton Suggested citation: Grue, M. and K. Morton. 2009. WMU 106 mule deer. Pages 50 54. In: N. Webb and R. Anderson. Delegated aerial ungulate
More informationMoose habitat in the Lower Goldstream Valley, Jan 2007
Moose habitat in the Lower Goldstream Valley, Jan 2007 Moose population monitoring in the Lake Revelstoke (Management Units 4-38 and 4-39) and North Thompson (MUs 3-43 and 3-44) valleys, January 2006 and
More informationApril Nisga a Fisheries & Wildlife Department
April 2013 Nisga a Fisheries & Wildlife Department Nass Wildlife Committee created by the Nisga a Final Agreement Only wildlife co-management body in B.C. First Nass Wildlife Management Plan 2001 Annual
More informationBRENT N. LONNER, Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, Fish & Wildlife Division, PO Box 488, Fairfield, MT 59436, USA
History of Bighorn Sheep in the Sun River Area, Montana BRENT N. LONNER, Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, Fish & Wildlife Division, PO Box 488, Fairfield, MT 59436, USA Abstract: The Sun River bighorn sheep
More informationMountain Goat Horns Of The Kootenay Region Of British Columbia
Mountain Goat Horns Of The Kootenay Region Of British Columbia DUNCAN GILCHRIST, POB 696, Corvallis, MT. 59828, 406 961-4314. Abstract: The Wildlife Branch of the province of British Columbia was kind
More informationShuswap and Boundary Mule Deer Composition Surveys:
Shuswap and Boundary Mule Deer Composition Surveys: November/December 2011 Aaron Reid Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations Fish & Wildlife Section Penticton, BC January 2012 Funding
More information2012 Kootenay-Boundary Mule Deer Management Plan: Outline and Background Information
2012 Kootenay-Boundary Mule Deer Management Plan: Outline and Background Information The Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations is currently developing a mule deer management plan for
More informationREVISED ECOSYSTEM-BASED UNGULATE HABITAT MODELS FOR BOUNDARY TSA AND TFL 8
REVISED ECOSYSTEM-BASED UNGULATE HABITAT MODELS FOR BOUNDARY TSA AND TFL 8 PREPARED BY Dennis L. Hamilton, RPBio Nanuq Consulting, Nelson, BC Steven F. Wilson, Ph.D, RPBio. EcoLogic Research, Gabriola
More information021 Deer Management Unit
021 Deer Management Unit Geographic Location: Deer Management Unit (DMU) 021 is 1,464 square miles in size and is located in the central Upper Peninsula (UP). This DMU is dominated by publicly owned land
More informationStatus Of Oregon Rocky Mountain Goats
Status Of Oregon Rocky Mountain Goats VICTOR L. COGGINS, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, 65495 Alder Slope Road, Enterprise, OR 97828, USA PATRICK E. MATTHEWS, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife,
More informationCariboo-Chilcotin (Region 5) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions
Harvest Cariboo-Chilcotin (Region 5) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions A number of questions and concerns have been expressed from resident hunters about the change in the mule deer hunting regulations
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Study on the Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to the Olympic Peninsula
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Study on the Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to the Olympic Peninsula Prepared by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Western Washington Office Introduction Historical records indicate
More informationSPOTLIGHT DEER SURVEY YO RANCHLANDS LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION ±10,400 ACRES KERR COUNTY
SPOTLIGHT DEER SURVEY YO RANCHLANDS LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION ±10,400 ACRES KERR COUNTY WRITTEN BY: SHANE KIEFER, CWB SARAH KAHLICH, AWB PLATEAU LAND & WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AUGUST 1, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
More informationWhite-Tailed Deer Management FAQ
December 6 th, 217 Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development White-Tailed Deer Management FAQ What are current white-tailed deer management objectives in the Kootenay
More informationTHE DIET OF Lutra canadensis IN THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER SYSTEM
THE DIET OF Lutra canadensis IN THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER SYSTEM Judith K. BERG 56 Pinnon Woods Drive, Sedona, AZ 86351-7917, USA. dberg@us.ibm.com Abstract: The North American river otter was reintroduced
More informationNalcor Energy Lower Churchill Project, Environmental Effects Monitoring Program 2017 Mealy Mountains Herd (MMH) Caribou
Nalcor Energy Lower Churchill Project, Environmental Effects Monitoring Program 2017 Mealy Mountains Herd (MMH) Caribou 2017 Aerial Survey Prepared for: Nalcor Energy Hydro Place, 500 Columbus Drive P.O.
More informationJob Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion
SPECIES: Goal: Manage the mountain lion population, its numbers and distribution, as an important part of Arizona s fauna and to provide mountain lion hunting recreation opportunity while maintaining existing
More informationCopyright 2018 by Jamie L. Sandberg
Copyright 2018 by Jamie L. Sandberg All rights reserved. This book or any portion thereof may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written permission of the publisher,
More informationFinal Review of New Information Appendix E AMPs-Sheep Allotments in Gravelly Mountains. c,llorttarta 'Fisft, MADISON RANGER DISTRICT.
RECEIVED + MAR 2 2 2017 c,llorttarta 'Fisft, MADISON RANGER DISTRICT J'Wi e 1400 South 19 th Avenue Bozeman MT 59718-5495 March 20, 2017 Dale Olsen Madison Ranger District 5 Forest Service Road Ennis,
More informationObservations of Deer and Wolves during the 2017 Moose Survey
Observations of Deer and Wolves during the 2017 Moose Survey Mike Schrage, Fond du Lac Resource Management Division Introduction Each year, we conduct an aerial survey in northeastern Minnesota in an effort
More informationDeer Management Unit 255
Deer Management Unit 255 Area Description DMU 255 is located primarily in northern Menominee County, but also extends into a small portion of Dickinson, Marquette, and Delta counties. It has totaled 463
More informationLife history Food Distribution Management... 98
BEAR: Table of Contents Overview Life history... 97 Food... 97 Distribution... 98 Management... 98 2010 Statistical Reports Controlled spring bear season harvest... 100 General season black bear harvest...
More informationShuswap and Boundary Mule Deer Composition Surveys: December 2010
Shuswap and Boundary Mule Deer Composition Surveys: December 2010 Aaron Reid Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations Fish & Wildlife Section Penticton, BC February 2011 Funding provided
More informationPopulation survey of Peary caribou (Rangifer tarandus pearyi) and muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) on Banks Island, Northwest Territories, July 2010
13 th Arctic Ungulate Conference Yellowknife, Canada 22-26 August, 2011 Brief Communication Population survey of Peary caribou (Rangifer tarandus pearyi) and muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) on Banks Island,
More informationTeton County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, For the Wyoming Wildlife Federation. David T. Taylor & Thomas Foulke
Teton County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015 For the Wyoming Wildlife Federation University of Wyoming, Department of Agricultural & Applied Economics David T. Taylor & Thomas Foulke 1 February
More informationWinter 2016 Hunting District 313 Elk survey (Gardiner to 6-Mile Creek) Date: Flight Duration: Weather/Survey Conditions: Survey Methods
Winter 2016 Hunting District 313 Elk survey (Gardiner to 6-Mile Creek) Prepared by Karen Loveless Livingston Area Wildlife Biologist, Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks 406-333-4211 kloveless@mt.gov This survey
More informationThe Intended Consequences of Wildlife Allocations in British Columbia
The Intended Consequences of Wildlife Allocations in British Columbia British Columbia Wildlife Federation BC s First Conservationists: 38,000 Strong May 4, 2011 Wildlife Allocations have become extremely
More informationSouth Selkirk Ungulate Survey: 2011 Survey Report
South Selkirk Ungulate Survey: 2011 Survey Report Prepared For: Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program Columbia Basin Nelson, BC Prepared By: Patrick Stent 1 and Ross Clarke 2 1 Mackenzie Wildlife Consulting:
More informationNorthern Mountain Caribou Population Dynamics Peace River Region
Peace River Region Sara Duncan University of Victoria May 2009 Executive Summary Executive Summary Past and current population sizes and demographics for six caribou herds in British Columbia s Peace
More informationDynamics of hunted and unhunted mountain goat Oreamnos americanus populations
Dynamics of hunted and unhunted mountain goat Oreamnos americanus populations Alejandro Gonzalez Voyer, Kirby G. Smith & Marco Festa-Bianchet Gonzalez Voyer, A., Smith, K.G. & Festa-Bianchet, M. 2003:
More informationOverview Life history Distribution Management
ROCKY MOUNTAIN GOATS: Table of Contents Overview Life history... 127 Distribution... 127 Management... 128 2004 Statistical Reports Rocky mountain goat herd composition... 129 Rocky mountain goat season
More informationPeace Region Wildlife Regulations Proposed Changes for Comment ( )
Peace Region Wildlife Regulations Proposed Changes for Comment (2010-11) INTRODUCTION This document summarizes changes to hunting regulations currently under consideration in the Peace Region. These changes,
More informationEnclosed, please find the 2018 Spotlight Deer Survey Report and Recommendations that we have prepared for your review and records.
July 26, 2018 YO Ranchlands Landowner Association 1323 Whispering Pines Houston, TX 77055 To the Wildlife Committee: Enclosed, please find the 2018 Spotlight Deer Survey Report and Recommendations that
More informationPopulation Ecology Yellowstone Elk by C. John Graves
Population Ecology Yellowstone Elk by C. John Graves Group Names: Hour Date: Date Assignment is due: end of class Score: + - Day of Week Date Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus) living in Yellowstone National
More informationDeer Management Unit 252
Deer Management Unit 252 Geographic Location: Deer Management Unit (DMU) 252 is 297 miles 2 in size and is primarily in southeastern Marquette, southwestern Alger and northwestern Delta County. This DMU
More informationfor New Hampshire s Moose
MARQUIS WALSH PHOTO for New Hampshire s Moose MARQUIS WALSH PHOTO To better understand population trends of New Hampshire s moose, a Fish and Game research project takes to the air with infrared technology.
More informationFremont County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015
Fremont County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015 For the Wyoming Wildlife Federation University of Wyoming, Department of Agricultural & Applied Economics David T. Taylor & Thomas Foulke September,
More informationPeary caribou (Rangifer tarandus pearyi) and muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) on northwest Victoria Island, Northwest Territories
13 th Arctic Ungulate Conference Yellowknife, Canada 22-26 August, 2011 Brief Communication Peary caribou (Rangifer tarandus pearyi) and muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) on northwest Victoria Island, Northwest
More informationPOPULATION INVENTORY OF THE AISHIHIK WOOD BISON (BISON BISON ATHABASCAE) HERD IN SOUTHWESTERN YUKON 2014
POPULATION INVENTORY OF THE AISHIHIK WOOD BISON (BISON BISON ATHABASCAE) HERD IN SOUTHWESTERN YUKON 2014 Prepared by: Thomas S. Jung and Katherina Egli 2014 POPULATION INVENTORY OF THE AISHIHIK WOOD BISON
More informationCarbon County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015
Carbon County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015 1 For the Wyoming Wildlife Federation University of Wyoming, Department of Agricultural & Applied Economics AAAAddd David T. Taylor & Thomas Foulke
More informationMULE DEER BUCK MIGRATIONS AND HABITAT USE IN THE BRIDGE RIVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA (FWCP Project # 11.W.BRG.05)
MULE DEER BUCK MIGRATIONS AND HABITAT USE IN THE BRIDGE RIVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA (FWCP Project # 11.W.BRG.05) Prepared by: Chris Procter, R.P.Bio Francis Iredale, R.P.Bio Doug Jury, R.P.Bio Ministry of
More informationBUFFALO PEAKS ELK MANAGEMENT PLAN EXTENSION
BUFFALO PEAKS ELK MANAGEMENT PLAN EXTENSION DATA ANALYSIS UNIT E-22 GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS 49, 57, 58 November 2017 Jamin Grigg, Wildlife Biologist Colorado Parks and Wildlife 7405 Highway 50 Salida, CO
More information2007 Nordquist Wood Bison Inventory
PEACE REGION TECHNICAL REPORT 2007 Nordquist Wood Bison Inventory by: Mike R. Rowe Wildlife Biologist Ministry of Environment 400 10003 110 th Avenue Fort St. John, British Columbia V1J 6M7 2007 F I S
More informationoose Management Guidelines )uly 96
oose Management Guidelines )uly 96 - Renewable Resources Foreword These interim management guidelines were developed by the Moose Management team from the Yukon Department of Renewable Resources. The management
More informationDeer Management Unit 152
Deer Management Unit 152 Geographic Location: Deer Management Unit (DMU) 152 is 386 miles 2 in size and is primarily in southwestern Marquette County. This DMU falls within the moderate snowfall zone and
More informationMule deer in the Boundary Region: Proposed research and discussion
Mule deer in the Boundary Region: Proposed research and discussion Sophie Gilbert, U. of Idaho Adam Ford, UBC Okanagan Jesse Zeman, BC Wildlife Federation The Boundary Deer Herd (it is) difficult to cast
More informationSummary of discussion
Tweedsmuir Caribou Modelling Project: Caribou Population Ecology Meeting Notes held March 5, 2008 Participants: Mark Williams, Debbie Cichowski, Don Morgan, Doug Steventon, Dave Daust Purpose: The purpose
More informationFWCP External Projects Delivered by Stakeholders and First Nations
FWCP External Projects Delivered by Stakeholders and First Nations 2013-2014 For more information contact FWCP-Columbia program manager, Trevor Oussoren Trevor.oussoren@bchydro.com 250-365-4551 2013-2014
More informationDeer Management Unit 122
Deer Management Unit 122 Area Description DMU 122 is located in south Dickinson County and includes a small portion of west central Menominee County. It encompasses 163 sq. miles and has remained unchanged
More informationWILDLIFE HARVEST STRATEGY IMPROVING BRITISH COLUMBIA S WILDLIFE HARVEST REGULATIONS
WILDLIFE HARVEST STRATEGY IMPROVING BRITISH COLUMBIA S WILDLIFE HARVEST REGULATIONS Province of British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks WILDLIFE PROGRAM April 1996 Wildlife Harvest Strategy
More informationObservations of Wolf and Deer during the 2015 Moose Survey
Observations of Wolf and Deer during the 2015 Moose Survey Mike Schrage, Fond du Lac Resource Management Division Introduction Each year, we conduct an aerial survey in northeastern Minnesota in an effort
More information2009 Aerial Moose Survey
2009 Aerial Moose Survey Mark S. Lenarz, Forest Wildlife Populations and Research Group Introduction Each year, we conduct an aerial survey in northeastern Minnesota in an effort to monitor moose (Alces
More informationKeywords: 7SI/Brown bear/harvest/harvest quota/hunting/malme/management/ mortality/population size/trend/ursus arctos
Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning. Management with the brown bear population in Slovenia. Report: 1-6. 2006. Republic of Slovenia, Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning. Keywords:
More informationManagement Unit 4-34 Moose Inventory
Management Unit 4-34 Moose Inventory Prepared For: John Krebs Fish & Wildlife Compensation Program (Columbia Basin) 103-333 Victoria St Nelson, BC V1L 4K3 Prepared By: Patrick Stent Ministry of Environment
More informationWILDLIFE RESEARCH PERMIT NUMBER WL
WILDLIFE RESEARCH PERMIT NUMBER WL005611- PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT TITLE: GREATER NAHANNI CARIBOU POPULATION MONITORING PERIOD: SEPTEMBER OCTOBER 2008 MAIN INVESTIGATOR: TROY HEGEL LOCATION From 26 28 September,
More informationMoose inventory of the Raft River area (MU 3-40) January-February 2009
Cow and calf in the Raft drainage. Photo: R. Klafki Moose inventory of the Raft River area (MU 3-40) January-February 2009 Prepared for: BC Ministry of Forests and Range Research Branch 4 th Floor, 727
More informationSaguache Mule Deer Herd Data Analysis Unit D-26 Game Management Units 68, 681 and 682 March 2008
Saguache Mule Deer Herd Data Analysis Unit D-26 Game Management Units 68, 681 and 682 March 2008 Colorado Division of Wildlife 0722 S Co Rd 1 E Monte Vista, CO 81144 Revised by Brad Weinmeister Terrestrial
More informationRam Harvest Strategies for Western States and Provinces 2007
Ram Harvest Strategies for Western States and Provinces 2007 Authored by: Wild Sheep Foundation Professional Biologist Meeting Attendees (Biologists from all agencies that hunt wild sheep in the United
More informationUNGULATE AERIAL SURVEY ANALYSIS AND SUMMARY 2000, 2004 AND 2007 IN THE SOUTH SELKIRK MOUNTAINS OF SOUTHEASTERN BRITISH COLUMBIA.
UNGULATE AERIAL SURVEY ANALYSIS AND SUMMARY 2000, 2004 AND 2007 IN THE SOUTH SELKIRK MOUNTAINS OF SOUTHEASTERN BRITISH COLUMBIA. Prepared for Fish & Wildlife Compensation Program Columbia Basin 103 333
More informationALTERNATIVE DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS. 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 16A, 45A, 45B, 45C, and White-tailed Deer Units
ALTERNATIVE DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 16A, 45A, 45B, 45C, and White-tailed Deer Units Arizona Game and Fish Department April 4, 2006 Alternative Deer Management
More informationMOUNTAIN LION MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR Lion DAU L-16
MOUNTAIN LION MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR Lion DAU L-16 Game Management Units 69, 82, 84, 86, 691 and 861 Prepared for: Colorado Division of Wildlife Southeast Region By: Allen Vitt Terrestrial Biologist,
More informationmake people aware of the department s actions for improving the deer population monitoring system,
Investing in Wisconsin s Whitetails 1 Over the last 60 years, the department has developed a deer herd monitoring and management system that seeks to use the best science and data possible. The deer monitoring
More informationManagement Unit 7-45 Moose Inventory: December 2006
Moose Inventory Summary Report Management Unit 7-45 Moose Inventory: December 2006 Report: January, 2007 Author: Mike Rowe 1 Wildlife Biologist British Columbia Ministry of Environment Environmental Stewardship
More informationIroquoia Heights Conservation Area White-tailed Deer Management Strategy
Iroquoia Heights Conservation Area White-tailed Deer Management Strategy Public Engagement Workshops May 31 st and June 1 st, 2011 Hosted by Hamilton Conservation Authority (HCA) and the Deer Management
More informationHUNTING LICENSING REGULATION 8/99
PDF Version [Printer-friendly - ideal for printing entire document] HUNTING LICENSING REGULATION 8/99 Published by Quickscribe Services Ltd. Updated To: [includes B.C. Reg. 79/2018, App. 2 amendments (effective
More informationEnvironmental Appeal Board
Environmental Appeal Board Fourth Floor 747 Fort Street Victoria British Columbia Telephone: (250) 387-3464 Facsimile: (250) 356-9923 Mailing Address: PO Box 9425 Stn Prov Govt Victoria BC V8W 9V1 APPEAL
More information