Office of Institutional Research And Planning
|
|
- Lucas Eaton
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Office of Institutional Research And Planning Ivy Tech Graduate Survey Data Tabulations Results by Region Region H: Central Indiana May 2011 Prepared by Research & Marketing Insight, Inc.
2 How to Use These Tables The tabulation banners show the raw numbers, frequencies (percentages), and other statistics for the survey. The first column is the total for all survey respondents. The data are unweighted. The columns to the right of the Total column represent raw data, frequencies, and other statistics for selected subgroups that will be used in the analysis. Each column has an upper-case letter positioned underneath the column title. As you look at the tables, you will see that some percentages and means have letters positioned below them. These letters show that the particular result is statistically significantly greater than the data in the designated columns. The cutoff, or confidence level, set for the statistical tests is 95%. This means that if you repeated this survey 100 times, 95 out of the 100 times you would receive a result within one standard deviation from this survey s response for that item. The footnote after each table indicates which columns have been tested against each other. For example: Assume 70.6% of respondents in the Fine Arts and Design division (column B) and 57.8% of respondents in the Business division (column C) cited Personal interest or self-improvement as an educational objective they hoped to accomplish by attending Ivy Tech. In the tab banner, assume Fine Arts and Design s 70.6% has a C beneath it. This means that the proportion of respondents in the Fine Arts and Design division is significantly higher than the proportion of respondents in the Business division who wished to accomplish this objective by attending Ivy Tech. The Base for each question represents the total number of possible respondents for that question. The base size may vary depending on who is eligible to respond to a given question, and who actually responds. As a rule, those who do not respond, or say they don t know, are not included in the base. The top number for each item represents the actual number of people giving that answer. The bottom number shows the percentage of the base those respondents represent. While percentages are rounded to the first decimal point in the tables, we have rounded to the nearest whole number for reports. For some questions on the survey, respondents were permitted to provide more than one answer. The percentages may greatly exceed 100 if you add the numbers in the column for these items.
3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table 1 Page 1...Q2. Which of the following educational objectives did you hope to accomplish by attending Ivy Tech? Table 2 Page 3...Q3. Did you achieve your Ivy Tech educational objectives upon graduating from the College? Table 3 Page 4...Q4. Why were your Ivy Tech educational objectives not achieved upon graduation? Table 4 Page 6...Q5. Which of the following best describes your current employment status? Table 5 Page 7...Q6. How satisfied are you with your current position? Table 6 Page 9...Q7. How related is your current position to the education you received at Ivy Tech? Table 7 Page 10...Q8. Are you actively seeking a different position? Table 8 Page 11...Q10. What was your status with your current employer either prior to or during enrollment at Ivy Tech? Table 9 Page 13...Q11. After graduation, did your job require you to move...? Table 10 Page 14...Q12. How much, if any, FULL-TIME work experience of ANY TYPE (excluding internships) did you have prior to graduating from Ivy Tech? Table 11 Page 16...Q13. How much, if any, FULL-TIME work experience IN THE FIELD OF YOUR CURRENT JOB did you have prior to graduating from Ivy Tech? Table 12 Page 17...Q14. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE TO ENTER OR RE-ENTER THE JOB MARKET? Table 13 Page 19...Q15. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you IMPROVE SKILLS FOR YOUR CURRENT JOB? Table 14 Page 21...Q16. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE FOR A SALARY INCREASE AT YOUR CURRENT EMPLOYER? Table 15 Page 23...Q17. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE FOR A PROMOTION OPPORTUNITY AT YOUR CURRENT EMPLOYER? Table 16 Page 25...Q18. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE FOR A NEW POSITION WITH A DIFFERENT EMPLOYER IN THE SAME FIELD? Table 17 Page 27...Q19. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE TO CHANGE CAREERS? Table 18 Page 29...Q20. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you FULFILL AN EMPLOYER REQUIREMENT? Table 19 Page 31...Q21. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you FULFILL A PERSONAL INTEREST OR SELF-IMPROVEMENT GOAL? Table 20 Page 33...Q22. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you EARN CREDITS TO TRANSFER TO ANOTHER COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY? Table 21 Page 35...Q23. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE TO EARN A PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION? Table 22 Page 37...Q14-Q23. Top Two Box Summary Table. Table 23 Page 39...Q14-Q23. Bottom Two Box Summary Table. Table 24 Page 41...Q14-Q23. Mean Summary Table.
4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table 25 Page 43...Q24. How has your salary changed since you graduated from Ivy Tech? Table 26 Page 44...Q25. What percentage increase in total compensation have you received since you graduated from Ivy Tech? Table 27 Page 45...Q27. Which of the following best represents your current education status? Table 28 Page 46...Q28. Which college or university are you attending? Table 29 Page 49...Q29. How would you rate the overall education and training you received at Ivy Tech? Table 30 Page 50...Q30. Did you participate in an internship through an employer for which you earned college credit while enrolled at Ivy Tech? This internship could have been a paid or unpaid opportunity. Table 31 Page 51...Q31. How beneficial was this internship in helping you obtain full-time employment? Table 32 Page 53...Q32. Which of the following resources of Ivy Tech's Career Services have you used? Table 33 Page 56...Q33. Did you need to use any resources offered by career services? Table 34 Page 57...Q34. Were you aware that Ivy Tech graduates may use its career services resources at any time after graduation? Table 35 Page 58...Q35. What is your current annual base salary, not including benefits, commissions, bonuses, or other incentives? Table 36 Page 60...Q36. Which of the following ranges best describes your current annual base salary, not including benefits, commissions, bonuses, or other incentives? Table 37 Page 62...Q35/36. What is your current annual base salary, not including benefits, commissions, bonuses, or other incentives? Table 38 Page 64...Q37. Please indicate the extent to which you agree with the following statement. - INCREASING DIVERSITY AMONG FACULTY, STAFF, AND STUDENTS SHOULD BE A FOCUS FOR THE COLLEGE. Table 39 Page 66...Q38. Please indicate the extent to which you agree with the following statement. - YOUR OVERALL IVY TECH EXPERI HELPED YOU LEARN HOW TO INTERACT EFFECTIVELY WITH PERSONS OF BACKGROUNDS, CULTURES, AND PERSPECTIVES DIFFERENT FROM YOUR OWN. Table 40 Page 68...Q39. Please indicate the extent to which you agree with the following statement. - YOUR OVERALL IVY TECH EXPERI HELPED YOU LEARN TO LOOK BEYOND YOUR LOCAL PERSPECTIVE TO BECOME A GLOBAL CITIZEN. Table 41 Page 70...Q40. Approximately how many hours, if any, in a typical month do you volunteer your time and talents through a for-profit, not-forprofit, or faith based service organization? Table 42 Page 72...Q41. Do you have any additional feedback or suggestions for Ivy Tech that you would like to share? Table 43 Page 82...Q42. Would you like to be entered into the drawing for a chance to win one of five $100 Target gift cards? Table 44 Page 83...Region. Table 45 Page 84...School. Table 46 Page 86...Gender.
5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table 47 Page 87...Degree Type. Table 48 Page 88...Age of Graduate. Table 49 Page 89...Ethnicity.
6 Table 1 Page 1 Q2. Which of the following educational objectives did you hope to accomplish by attending Ivy Tech? BASE: TOTAL UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Completing an Ivy Tech degree/technical 83.0% 100.0% 82.7% 63.2% 85.0% 84.1% 84.6% 89.5% 60.0% 85.8% 77.6% 75.9% 82.4% 89.4% 78.0% 86.4% 83.7% 84.3% 76.9% 75.0% 85.9% 90.2% 78.0% 80.8% certificate program CDEFG D O Personal interest or self improvement 76.2% 100.0% 80.2% 57.9% 72.5% 81.0% 73.8% 78.9% 80.0% 77.8% 73.1% 65.5% 82.4% 81.7% 75.6% 67.8% 74.9% 80.4% 76.9% 87.5% 75.0% 80.3% 74.6% 76.2% CDEFGH Preparing to enter or re enter the job market 61.0% 75.0% 44.4% 26.3% 71.2% 63.5% 78.5% 42.1% 100.0% 58.5% 58.2% 82.8% 58.8% 68.3% 57.7% 59.3% 62.9% 60.8% 61.5% 50.0% 68.8% 72.1% 57.6% 55.0% D CDH CD CDH CDEFGH JK X Earning credits to transfer to another college/ 53.9% 50.0% 67.9% 73.7% 41.2% 50.8% 35.4% 100.0% 60.0% 52.4% 61.2% 37.9% 82.4% 57.7% 55.4% 45.8% 51.4% 66.7% 69.2% 62.5% 59.4% 54.1% 50.8% 52.3% university EFG EG BCDEFG L JL Q Preparing to change careers % 25.0% 56.8% 47.4% 72.5% 55.6% 23.1% 47.4% 80.0% 52.8% 61.2% 44.8% 29.4% 46.2% 54.2% 61.0% 52.6% 54.9% 61.5% 50.0% 48.4% 50.8% 54.2% 54.3% G BCDFGH G G M M Improving skills for your current job 40.8% 25.0% 35.8% 15.8% 28.8% 34.9% 80.0% 36.8% 47.6% 25.4% 44.8% 29.4% 37.5% 44.0% 35.6% 40.2% 39.2% 46.2% 37.5% 37.5% 44.3% 39.0% 41.7% D BCDEFH K
7 Table 1 Page 2 (Continued) Q2. Which of the following educational objectives did you hope to accomplish by attending Ivy Tech? Preparing for a salary increase at your current 33.0% 25.0% 27.2% 21.1% 30.0% 17.5% 64.6% 36.8% 40.6% 14.9% 34.5% 11.8% 31.7% 37.5% 25.4% 33.9% 35.3% 38.5% 12.5% 26.6% 42.6% 30.5% 33.1% employer CDEFH KM K Preparing for a promotion opportunity at your current 27.7% 25.0% 30.9% 15.8% 23.8% 15.9% 47.7% 21.1% 33.5% 11.9% 27.6% 11.8% 28.8% 29.2% 23.7% 29.1% 25.5% 38.5% 21.9% 34.4% 33.9% 25.2% employer F CDEFH KM Fulfilling an employer requirement 21.4% 19.8% 12.5% 9.5% 50.8% 36.8% 23.1% 9.0% 41.4% 17.6% 21.2% 25.0% 11.9% 21.5% 23.5% 30.8% 29.7% 19.7% 23.7% 17.9% CEF EF K K P Preparing for a new position with a different 20.8% 25.0% 18.5% 5.3% 16.2% 17.5% 32.3% 42.1% 23.6% 13.4% 24.1% 17.6% 25.0% 18.5% 18.6% 19.1% 25.5% 30.8% 12.5% 23.4% 26.2% 20.3% 17.9% employer in the same field D DEF DEF K Completing an apprenticeship program 14.6% 3.7% 2.5% 3.2% 61.5% 10.5% 13.7% 10.4% 41.4% 5.9% 10.6% 20.8% 5.1% 15.1% 11.8% 23.1% 25.0% 17.2% 13.1% 20.3% 11.9% CEFH JKM NP Preparing to earn a professional certification 14.3% 22.2% 11.2% 12.7% 16.9% 10.5% 13.2% 14.9% 20.7% 11.8% 14.4% 15.5% 8.5% 12.4% 15.7% 30.8% 28.1% 6.6% 16.9% 10.6% VX No Response % 1.2% 5.6% 1.0% 0.4% 1.5%
8 Table 2 Page 3 Q3. Did you achieve your Ivy Tech educational objectives upon graduating from the College? BASE: TOTAL UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Yes % 100.0% 86.4% 94.4% 97.4% 96.8% 92.2% 94.7% 100.0% 94.7% 92.3% 79.3% 100.0% 95.1% 93.3% 91.4% 93.9% 92.2% 92.3% 87.5% 96.9% 90.0% 96.6% 91.9% CG C C CG L JKL No % 13.6% 5.6% 2.6% 3.2% 7.8% 5.3% 5.3% 7.7% 20.7% 4.9% 6.7% 8.6% 6.1% 7.8% 7.7% 12.5% 3.1% 10.0% 3.4% 8.1% EF J Don't know/unsure % 1.2% 1.5% 0.5% 1.5% 1.0% 0.6% 0.8% 1.7% 0.7% Refused % 1.2% 5.3% 1.2% 1.6% 0.9% 1.5% 1.0% 1.2% 1.7% 1.6% 1.5% 1.6% 1.3%
9 Table 3 Page 4 Q4. Why were your Ivy Tech educational objectives not achieved upon graduation? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Not yet obtaining employment 59.1% 72.7% 100.0% 50.0% 40.0% 100.0% 36.4% 60.0% 100.0% 40.0% 63.6% 80.0% 60.0% 50.0% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 33.3% 100% 58.3% CG CG J QR QR VX VX A transfer to another university that has not 18.2% 9.1% 50.0% 20.0% 100.0% 9.1% 40.0% 16.7% 40.0% 9.1% 20.0% 20.0% 100% 50.0% 33.3% 8.3% happened yet CG Q Financial reasons % 50.0% 40.0% 100.0% 18.2% 40.0% 20.0% 18.2% 20.0% 13.3% 25.0% 100% 50.0% 33.3% 8.3% G QR Personal reasons % 9.1% 100.0% 100.0% 18.2% 20.0% 16.7% 20.0% 9.1% 20.0% 13.3% 100% 50.0% 16.7% 50.0% 8.3% C C Q An intent to complete another degree at Ivy Tech 13.6% 9.1% 50.0% 100.0% 9.1% 40.0% 18.2% 20.0% 13.3% 100% 50.0% 16.7% 8.3% C Q Have not found a better job/ not gotten a promotion 4.5% 9.1% 20.0% 20.0% 6.7% 16.7%
10 Table 3 Page 5 (Continued) Q4. Why were your Ivy Tech educational objectives not achieved upon graduation? Economy % 9.1% 9.1% 9.1% 6.7% 50.0% Problems with Ivy Tech % 100.0% 20.0% 20.0% 100% 50.0% Degree not enough/need work experience 4.5% 20.0% 9.1% 9.1% 25.0% 8.3% Other % 18.2% 9.1% 20.0% 9.1% 20.0% 13.3% 16.7%
11 Table 4 Page 6 Q5. Which of the following best describes your current employment status? BASE: TOTAL UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Employed full-time (35 or more hours per week) 63.1% 50.0% 62.2% 36.8% 72.5% 56.5% 67.7% 57.9% 80.0% 100.0% 52.4% 72.0% 56.9% 62.7% 70.0% 69.2% 50.0% 47.7% 60.7% 64.4% 70.7% D DF D D NP U Employed part-time % 25.0% 22.0% 36.8% 20.0% 25.8% 7.7% 21.1% 100.0% 30.5% 11.9% 24.1% 20.2% 12.0% 23.1% 50.0% 35.4% 24.6% 18.6% 12.0% G G G G O O R WX X Temporary employment % 25.0% 2.4% 5.3% 5.0% 3.2% 4.8% 2.4% 1.7% 3.2% 2.0% 3.1% 3.3% 5.1% 2.0% Unemployed, seeking employment 8.6% 7.3% 10.5% 2.5% 8.1% 21.5% 100.0% 5.7% 9.5% 12.1% 9.1% 8.0% 7.7% 4.6% 6.6% 6.8% 11.3% CEF Unemployed, not actively seeking employment 5.4% 6.1% 10.5% 6.5% 3.1% 21.1% 20.0% 100.0% 6.7% 4.2% 5.2% 4.8% 8.0% 9.2% 4.9% 5.1% 4.0% Don't know/unsure % 1.6% 1.7% 2.0% 0.7%
12 Table 5 Page 7 Q6. How satisfied are you with your current position? BASE: TOTAL UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Top Two Box % 50.0% 84.3% 80.0% 87.2% 75.5% 81.6% 73.3% 100.0% 88.2% 67.2% 75.0% 85.5% 83.0% 81.5% 83.3% 91.7% 75.0% 78.6% 75.9% 82.7% 85.7% BCEFGH K 5 - Very Satisfied % 25.0% 31.4% 26.7% 65.4% 37.7% 42.9% 26.7% 100.0% 52.6% 20.9% 40.2% 48.3% 38.3% 44.4% 40.5% 58.3% 50.0% 35.7% 42.6% 55.8% 43.7% CDFGH CDEFGH K U B 4 - Somewhat satisfied % 25.0% 52.9% 53.3% 21.8% 37.7% 38.8% 46.7% 35.5% 46.3% 34.8% 37.2% 44.7% 37.0% 42.9% 33.3% 25.0% 42.9% 33.3% 26.9% 42.1% E E E W 3 - Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 8.0% 25.0% 7.1% 3.8% 13.2% 10.2% 13.3% 5.7% 13.4% 10.9% 6.9% 6.4% 8.3% 4.8% 8.3% 12.5% 12.5% 5.6% 11.5% 5.6% Bottom Two Box % 25.0% 8.6% 20.0% 9.0% 11.3% 8.2% 13.3% 6.2% 19.4% 14.1% 7.6% 10.6% 10.2% 11.9% 12.5% 8.9% 18.5% 5.8% 8.7% J W 2 - Somewhat Dissatisfied % 25.0% 2.9% 6.7% 5.1% 9.4% 2.0% 13.3% 3.3% 9.0% 7.6% 4.1% 6.4% 5.6% 7.1% 12.5% 7.1% 7.4% 1.9% 5.6%
13 Table 5 Page 8 (Continued) Q6. How satisfied are you with your current position? 1 - Very Dissatisfied % 5.7% 13.3% 3.8% 1.9% 6.1% 2.8% 10.4% 6.5% 3.4% 4.3% 4.6% 4.8% 1.8% 11.1% 3.8% 3.2% U Don't know/unsure % 1.2% 0.5% 1.7% 0.4% 0.7% MEAN CDF H K N STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD ERROR MEDIAN
14 Table 6 Page 9 Q7. How related is your current position to the education you received at Ivy Tech? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% 3 - Definitely related % 25.0% 35.2% 20.0% 83.3% 50.9% 55.1% 46.7% 75.0% 62.7% 32.8% 42.4% 62.8% 54.2% 53.9% 50.0% 75.0% 62.5% 48.2% 50.0% 53.8% 59.8% BCDFGH D CD D K N 2 - Somewhat related % 50.0% 36.6% 20.0% 9.0% 18.9% 32.7% 26.7% 25.0% 25.0% 17.9% 33.7% 19.3% 18.8% 23.5% 28.6% 16.7% 25.0% 26.8% 25.9% 25.0% 21.3% EF E OP 1 - Not at all related % 25.0% 28.2% 60.0% 7.7% 30.2% 12.2% 26.7% 12.3% 49.3% 23.9% 17.9% 27.1% 22.6% 21.4% 8.3% 12.5% 25.0% 24.1% 21.2% 18.9% EG CEFG EG J MEAN D BCDFGH D CD D K N STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD ERROR MEDIAN
15 Table 7 Page 10 Q8. Are you actively seeking a different position? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Yes % 75.0% 42.3% 20.0% 19.2% 41.5% 24.5% 26.7% 25.0% 23.1% 49.3% 39.1% 24.8% 35.4% 30.0% 33.3% 41.7% 25.0% 37.5% 37.0% 30.8% 26.0% DEGH EG E J O No % 25.0% 57.7% 80.0% 80.8% 58.5% 75.5% 73.3% 75.0% 76.9% 50.7% 60.9% 75.2% 64.6% 70.0% 66.7% 58.3% 75.0% 62.5% 63.0% 69.2% 74.0% B BCF BC B K N
16 Table 8 Page 11 Q10. What was your status with your current employer either prior to or during enrollment at Ivy Tech? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Not employed with current employer prior to or during 40.6% 100.0% 25.4% 40.0% 56.4% 42.3% 34.7% 20.0% 75.0% 40.6% 36.4% 44.6% 42.4% 31.2% 40.7% 38.1% 41.7% 50.0% 41.1% 42.6% 46.2% 37.3% enrollment at Ivy Tech CDEFGH CGH C CH Full-time employee 35 or more hours per week 35.8% 46.5% 33.3% 15.4% 38.5% 51.0% 53.3% 45.8% 7.6% 17.4% 43.8% 45.8% 33.3% 54.8% 41.7% 12.5% 17.9% 22.2% 32.7% 50.8% E E E E K N N QT UVW Part-time employee % 23.9% 20.0% 23.1% 13.5% 4.1% 20.0% 8.5% 47.0% 29.3% 9.0% 16.7% 19.9% 4.8% 16.7% 12.5% 33.9% 31.5% 5.8% 8.7% G G J O R WX WX Intern % 2.8% 5.1% 5.8% 8.2% 25.0% 4.2% 7.6% 7.6% 3.5% 4.2% 5.1% 2.4% 12.5% 5.4% 3.7% 11.5% 2.4% X Employed % 6.7% 0.5% 0.7% 0.5% 1.9% Work study % 6.7% 1.5% 2.1% 12.5% 1.8% Temporary employee % 1.4% 1.1% 0.5% 1.9%
17 Table 8 Page 12 (Continued) Q10. What was your status with your current employer either prior to or during enrollment at Ivy Tech? Self-employed % 2.0% 0.5% 0.7% 0.8% Don't know/unsure % 1.6% 1.5% 0.6% 0.4% 0.7%
18 Table 9 Page 13 Q11. After graduation, did your job require you to move...? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Out of state % 2.8% 6.7% 1.9% 1.4% 1.5% 1.1% 2.1% 0.9% 2.4% 12.5% 1.9% 1.9% 1.6% More than 50 miles from previous residence but 2.8% 2.8% 3.8% 8.2% 2.8% 3.0% 2.2% 2.8% 4.2% 1.4% 7.1% 8.3% 12.5% 7.1% 5.8% 0.8% still in state Neither % 100.0% 94.4% 93.3% 100.0% 94.3% 91.8% 100.0% 100.0% 95.8% 95.5% 96.7% 95.2% 95.8% 97.7% 90.5% 91.7% 75.0% 92.9% 98.1% 92.3% 97.6% CG CG CG CG
19 Table 10 Page 14 Q12. How much, if any, FULL-TIME work experience of ANY TYPE (excluding internships) did you have prior to graduating from Ivy Tech? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% None % 50.0% 14.6% 16.7% 15.0% 14.3% 10.8% 26.3% 11.8% 23.9% 7.1% 33.3% 23.8% 9.6% 11.9% 13.1% 15.7% 23.1% 25.0% 76.9% JL L OP Less than 1 year % 25.0% 7.3% 6.2% 3.2% 20.0% 2.8% 10.4% 3.6% 7.6% 3.0% 3.4% 3.6% 3.9% 23.1% 23.1% 1-3 years % 25.0% 20.7% 22.2% 15.0% 20.6% 13.8% 21.1% 20.0% 17.5% 22.4% 14.3% 16.7% 37.1% 12.0% 3.4% 21.5% 9.8% 7.7% 12.5% 100% OP P R 4-6 years % 18.3% 16.7% 15.0% 19.0% 23.1% 5.3% 20.0% 17.9% 16.4% 14.3% 16.7% 23.8% 16.8% 6.8% 16.7% 17.6% 15.4% 37.5% 100% H P P 7-9 years % 7.3% 22.2% 8.8% 6.3% 10.8% 21.1% 20.0% 10.8% 17.9% 16.7% 4.8% 15.6% 3.4% 10.8% 11.8% 21.9% NP 10 years or more % 31.7% 22.2% 40.0% 36.5% 41.5% 26.3% 20.0% 39.2% 26.9% 42.9% 16.7% 2.9% 43.1% 71.2% 34.3% 41.2% 30.8% 25.0% 78.1% M M N NO
20 Table 10 Page 15 (Continued) Q12. How much, if any, FULL-TIME work experience of ANY TYPE (excluding internships) did you have prior to graduating from Ivy Tech? Don't know/unsure % 5.3% 3.4% 0.6% 0.4%
21 Table 11 Page 16 Q13. How much, if any, FULL-TIME work experience IN THE FIELD OF YOUR CURRENT JOB did you have prior to graduating from Ivy Tech? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% None % 50.0% 24.2% 23.1% 62.1% 29.8% 26.2% 27.3% 50.0% 29.4% 56.9% 42.5% 32.8% 39.0% 37.0% 27.8% 33.3% 66.7% 50.0% 37.0% 32.7% 36.2% CDFGH J Less than 1 year % 50.0% 19.4% 7.7% 15.2% 8.5% 25.0% 11.2% 15.7% 17.8% 10.7% 4.9% 10.1% 11.1% 55.6% 50.0% 13.0% 15.4% 5.5% P QR VWX 1-3 years % 22.6% 7.7% 10.6% 21.3% 19.0% 9.1% 17.6% 13.7% 23.3% 14.5% 12.2% 18.5% 16.7% 35.2% 19.2% 9.4% X 4-6 years % 16.1% 7.7% 3.0% 12.8% 23.8% 18.2% 25.0% 16.0% 2.0% 12.3% 14.5% 7.3% 14.3% 11.1% 7.4% 25.0% 11.8% E E K VX 7-9 years % 3.2% 30.8% 1.5% 4.3% 11.9% 18.2% 7.5% 2.0% 2.7% 9.9% 2.4% 5.8% 11.1% 11.1% 1.9% 5.8% 9.4% CEF E K NP V 10 years or more % 14.5% 23.1% 7.6% 23.4% 19.0% 27.3% 18.2% 9.8% 1.4% 17.6% 34.1% 14.3% 22.2% 33.3% 5.6% 1.9% 27.6% E N NO VW
22 Table 12 Page 17 Q14. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE TO ENTER OR RE-ENTER THE JOB MARKET? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Top Two Box % 100.0% 86.2% 76.9% 95.9% 94.2% 88.7% 88.2% 100.0% 95.4% 86.7% 73.9% 85.7% 95.5% 92.3% 76.6% 92.5% 81.0% 90.9% 100% 89.5% 96.2% 91.7% 88.6% CDG C CDG L P P QR X 4 - Very Helpful % 100.0% 33.8% 7.7% 75.3% 57.7% 52.8% 58.8% 80.0% 62.1% 48.3% 26.1% 42.9% 53.9% 54.2% 55.3% 54.7% 57.1% 45.5% 50.0% 50.9% 50.9% 64.6% 53.7% CDEFGH D CDFG CD CD D CD L L 3 - Somewhat Helpful % 52.3% 69.2% 20.5% 36.5% 35.8% 29.4% 20.0% 33.3% 38.3% 47.8% 42.9% 41.6% 38.0% 21.3% 37.7% 23.8% 45.5% 50.0% 38.6% 45.3% 27.1% 35.0% E EFGHI P P Bottom Two Box % 13.8% 23.1% 4.1% 5.8% 11.3% 11.8% 4.6% 13.3% 26.1% 14.3% 4.5% 7.7% 23.4% 7.5% 19.0% 9.1% 10.5% 3.8% 8.3% 11.4% E J NO V 2 - Not Very Helpful % 9.2% 7.7% 1.4% 3.8% 5.7% 2.3% 5.0% 17.4% 7.1% 3.4% 2.8% 12.8% 4.2% 7.1% 5.3% 1.9% 8.3% 4.1% E O 1 - Not At All Helpful % 4.6% 15.4% 2.7% 1.9% 5.7% 11.8% 2.3% 8.3% 8.7% 7.1% 1.1% 4.9% 10.6% 3.3% 11.9% 9.1% 5.3% 1.9% 7.3% N
23 Table 12 Page 18 (Continued) Q14. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE TO ENTER OR RE-ENTER THE JOB MARKET? Not applicable % 25.0% 20.7% 31.6% 8.8% 17.5% 16.9% 10.5% 17.9% 10.4% 17.2% 22.2% 15.2% 15.5% 18.6% 15.5% 17.6% 15.4% 25.0% 12.3% 13.1% 18.6% 17.9% E E Don't know % 1.5% 3.4% 1.7% 0.4% 0.7% MEAN D CDG CD D D KL STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD ERROR MEDIAN
24 Table 13 Page 19 Q15. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you IMPROVE SKILLS FOR YOUR CURRENT JOB? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Top Two Box % 100.0% 85.3% 84.6% 88.6% 89.6% 87.7% 76.5% 100.0% 89.5% 80.0% 78.9% 100.0% 92.0% 88.5% 74.5% 86.2% 87.0% 100.0% 100% 88.1% 92.0% 89.6% 83.5% CEFGH CEFGH JKL P P QR QR 4 - Very Helpful % 100.0% 36.8% 15.4% 77.1% 43.8% 52.6% 47.1% 50.0% 56.0% 42.0% 31.6% 55.6% 54.5% 51.1% 51.1% 50.2% 56.5% 63.6% 57.1% 50.8% 54.0% 54.2% 50.4% CDEFGH CDFGH D D D L 3 - Somewhat Helpful % 48.5% 69.2% 11.4% 45.8% 35.1% 29.4% 50.0% 33.5% 38.0% 47.4% 44.4% 37.5% 37.4% 23.4% 36.0% 30.4% 36.4% 42.9% 37.3% 38.0% 35.4% 33.1% E EGH E E Bottom Two Box % 14.7% 15.4% 11.4% 10.4% 12.3% 23.5% 10.5% 20.0% 21.1% 8.0% 11.5% 25.5% 13.8% 13.0% 11.9% 8.0% 10.4% 16.5% NO 2 - Not Very Helpful % 8.8% 7.7% 4.3% 2.1% 5.3% 5.9% 4.7% 6.0% 10.5% 3.4% 7.2% 4.3% 6.4% 4.3% 5.1% 2.0% 6.2% 6.6% 1 - Not At All Helpful % 5.9% 7.7% 7.1% 8.3% 7.0% 17.6% 5.8% 14.0% 10.5% 4.5% 4.3% 21.3% 7.4% 8.7% 6.8% 6.0% 4.2% 9.9% NO
25 Table 13 Page 20 (Continued) Q15. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you IMPROVE SKILLS FOR YOUR CURRENT JOB? Not applicable % 25.0% 15.9% 26.3% 12.5% 19.0% 9.2% 5.3% 60.0% 9.0% 22.4% 20.7% 50.0% 14.3% 14.3% 18.6% 17.1% 9.8% 12.5% 9.2% 16.4% 16.9% 15.9% CEGH J JKL Don't know % 1.2% 1.6% 0.5% 1.5% 1.2% 0.4% 7.7% 1.7% 0.7% Refused % 1.6% 3.4% 1.0% 0.4% 0.7% No Response % 5.3% 1.6% 3.1% 5.3% 0.5% 1.5% 10.3% 1.0% 1.8% 1.7% 1.6% 7.7% 1.6% 2.6% MEAN D CDFH KL P P STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD ERROR MEDIAN
26 Table 14 Page 21 Q16. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE FOR A SALARY INCREASE AT YOUR CURRENT EMPLOYER? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Top Two Box % 100.0% 58.9% 60.0% 80.0% 57.1% 77.8% 60.0% 100.0% 70.2% 58.3% 64.7% 83.3% 66.7% 73.0% 59.5% 67.9% 71.1% 66.7% 75.0% 70.5% 65.9% 73.0% 66.7% CDEFGH CF CF CDEFGH 4 - Very Helpful % 50.0% 25.0% 55.6% 28.6% 46.3% 33.3% 41.1% 27.8% 29.4% 33.3% 36.4% 38.7% 32.4% 35.3% 42.1% 25.0% 50.0% 45.5% 34.1% 32.4% 35.4% CF C 3 - Somewhat Helpful % 50.0% 33.9% 60.0% 24.4% 28.6% 31.5% 26.7% 100.0% 29.1% 30.6% 35.3% 50.0% 30.3% 34.2% 27.0% 32.7% 28.9% 41.7% 25.0% 25.0% 31.7% 40.5% 31.2% E CDEFGH Bottom Two Box % 41.1% 40.0% 20.0% 42.9% 22.2% 40.0% 29.8% 41.7% 35.3% 16.7% 33.3% 27.0% 40.5% 32.1% 28.9% 33.3% 25.0% 29.5% 34.1% 27.0% 33.3% EG EG 2 - Not Very Helpful % 19.6% 10.0% 6.7% 22.9% 5.6% 13.3% 13.9% 8.3% 23.5% 15.2% 14.4% 5.4% 12.8% 10.5% 33.3% 13.6% 12.2% 10.8% 13.5% EG EG 1 - Not At All Helpful % 21.4% 30.0% 13.3% 20.0% 16.7% 26.7% 15.9% 33.3% 11.8% 16.7% 18.2% 12.6% 35.1% 19.2% 18.4% 25.0% 15.9% 22.0% 16.2% 19.8% J O
27 Table 14 Page 22 (Continued) Q16. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE FOR A SALARY INCREASE AT YOUR CURRENT EMPLOYER? Not applicable % 50.0% 31.7% 47.4% 42.5% 42.9% 16.9% 21.1% 80.0% 28.3% 46.3% 37.9% 66.7% 36.2% 33.3% 37.3% 37.3% 25.5% 7.7% 50.0% 32.3% 32.8% 37.3% 35.1% G G GH G CEFGH J JL S S Don't know % 1.2% 0.5% 0.6% 0.4% 0.7% No Response % 1.6% 3.4% 1.0% 0.4% 0.7% MEAN CDF CD K P STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD ERROR MEDIAN
28 Table 15 Page 23 Q17. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE FOR A PROMOTION OPPORTUNITY AT YOUR CURRENT EMPLOYER? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Top Two Box % 100.0% 68.5% 50.0% 69.0% 69.7% 70.8% 69.2% 100.0% 73.8% 57.1% 38.5% 83.3% 68.1% 73.2% 58.8% 69.6% 70.6% 54.5% 66.7% 72.5% 69.8% 69.4% 66.7% CDEFGH CDEFGH L L 4 - Very Helpful % 27.8% 38.1% 39.4% 41.7% 38.5% 37.6% 22.9% 23.1% 50.0% 31.9% 35.1% 35.3% 31.1% 50.0% 18.2% 33.3% 40.0% 32.6% 36.1% 31.0% QS 3 - Somewhat Helpful % 100.0% 40.7% 50.0% 31.0% 30.3% 29.2% 30.8% 100.0% 36.2% 34.3% 15.4% 33.3% 36.2% 38.1% 23.5% 38.5% 20.6% 36.4% 33.3% 32.5% 37.2% 33.3% 35.7% CDEFGH CDEFGH R Bottom Two Box % 31.5% 50.0% 31.0% 30.3% 29.2% 30.8% 26.2% 42.9% 61.5% 16.7% 31.9% 26.8% 41.2% 30.4% 29.4% 45.5% 33.3% 27.5% 30.2% 30.6% 33.3% JM 2 - Not Very Helpful % 14.8% 20.0% 11.9% 15.2% 14.6% 7.7% 14.2% 8.6% 38.5% 15.9% 13.4% 11.8% 13.5% 8.8% 45.5% 12.5% 11.6% 16.7% 14.3% K QR 1 - Not At All Helpful % 16.7% 30.0% 19.0% 15.2% 14.6% 23.1% 12.1% 34.3% 23.1% 16.7% 15.9% 13.4% 29.4% 16.9% 20.6% 33.3% 15.0% 18.6% 13.9% 19.0% J
29 Table 15 Page 24 (Continued) Q17. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE FOR A PROMOTION OPPORTUNITY AT YOUR CURRENT EMPLOYER? Not applicable % 50.0% 34.1% 47.4% 46.2% 46.0% 24.6% 31.6% 80.0% 32.5% 47.8% 51.7% 66.7% 33.3% 41.1% 42.4% 40.1% 33.3% 15.4% 62.5% 36.9% 29.5% 39.0% 43.0% G G CGH J J S S Don't know % 1.2% 1.5% 0.9% 1.2% 0.8% 1.5% 0.7% No Response % 1.6% 3.4% 1.0% 0.4% 0.7% MEAN D KL STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD ERROR MEDIAN
30 Table 16 Page 25 Q18. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE FOR A NEW POSITION WITH A DIFFERENT EMPLOYER IN THE SAME FIELD? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Top Two Box % 100.0% 72.7% 60.0% 84.6% 80.0% 87.0% 68.8% 100.0% 84.4% 67.4% 66.7% 87.5% 82.2% 79.8% 72.2% 78.5% 77.1% 100.0% 66.7% 83.7% 80.0% 78.9% 77.1% CDEFGH CDEFGH K QR 4 - Very Helpful % 100.0% 38.2% 10.0% 67.3% 54.3% 45.7% 31.2% 100.0% 53.9% 37.2% 33.3% 50.0% 46.6% 50.0% 47.2% 46.8% 48.6% 58.3% 66.7% 51.2% 40.0% 60.5% 45.8% CDEFGH D CDGH D D CDEFGH K 3 - Somewhat Helpful % 34.5% 50.0% 17.3% 25.7% 41.3% 37.5% 30.5% 30.2% 33.3% 37.5% 35.6% 29.8% 25.0% 31.6% 28.6% 41.7% 32.6% 40.0% 18.4% 31.2% E E E W Bottom Two Box % 27.3% 40.0% 15.4% 20.0% 13.0% 31.2% 15.6% 32.6% 33.3% 12.5% 17.8% 20.2% 27.8% 21.5% 22.9% 33.3% 16.3% 20.0% 21.1% 22.9% J 2 - Not Very Helpful % 12.7% 10.0% 3.8% 5.7% 4.3% 6.2% 5.7% 4.7% 26.7% 5.5% 7.7% 8.3% 7.0% 11.4% 4.7% 5.0% 7.9% 8.3% 1 - Not At All Helpful % 14.5% 30.0% 11.5% 14.3% 8.7% 25.0% 9.9% 27.9% 6.7% 12.5% 12.3% 12.5% 19.4% 14.6% 11.4% 33.3% 11.6% 15.0% 13.2% 14.6% JL
31 Table 16 Page 26 (Continued) Q18. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE FOR A NEW POSITION WITH A DIFFERENT EMPLOYER IN THE SAME FIELD? Not applicable % 50.0% 32.9% 47.4% 32.5% 42.9% 27.7% 15.8% 80.0% 32.1% 35.8% 44.8% 55.6% 29.5% 36.3% 39.0% 36.1% 29.4% 7.7% 62.5% 30.8% 34.4% 35.6% 35.1% H H CEFGH S S S Don't know % 2.5% 1.5% 1.4% 1.8% 0.8% 2.0% 3.1% 0.7% No Response % 1.6% 3.4% 1.0% 0.4% 0.7% MEAN CDH D D K STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD ERROR MEDIAN
32 Table 17 Page 27 Q19. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE TO CHANGE CAREERS? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Top Two Box % 100.0% 79.1% 81.8% 92.9% 80.0% 80.5% 82.4% 100.0% 84.8% 87.7% 73.7% 63.6% 84.1% 84.3% 83.7% 82.8% 84.2% 91.7% 100% 86.5% 79.5% 88.9% 82.5% CEFG CF CEFG QR 4 - Very Helpful % 100.0% 41.8% 18.2% 78.6% 56.0% 36.6% 52.9% 100.0% 56.7% 61.4% 21.1% 45.5% 53.7% 56.7% 53.1% 54.0% 55.3% 58.3% 50.0% 51.9% 50.0% 57.8% 55.8% CDEFGH CDFGH D D CDEFGH L L 3 - Somewhat Helpful % 37.3% 63.6% 14.3% 24.0% 43.9% 29.4% 28.0% 26.3% 52.6% 18.2% 30.5% 27.6% 30.6% 28.8% 28.9% 33.3% 50.0% 34.6% 29.5% 31.1% 26.7% E EF EF JKM Bottom Two Box % 20.9% 18.2% 7.1% 20.0% 19.5% 17.6% 15.2% 12.3% 26.3% 36.4% 15.9% 15.7% 16.3% 17.2% 15.8% 8.3% 13.5% 20.5% 11.1% 17.5% E E 2 - Not Very Helpful % 10.4% 9.1% 1.4% 10.0% 9.8% 5.9% 6.7% 3.5% 15.8% 27.3% 6.1% 8.7% 6.1% 7.1% 10.5% 8.3% 5.8% 6.8% 6.7% 8.3% E 1 - Not At All Helpful % 10.4% 9.1% 5.7% 10.0% 9.8% 11.8% 8.5% 8.8% 10.5% 9.1% 9.8% 7.1% 10.2% 10.1% 5.3% 7.7% 13.6% 4.4% 9.2%
33 Table 17 Page 28 (Continued) Q19. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE TO CHANGE CAREERS? Not applicable % 75.0% 18.3% 36.8% 10.0% 20.6% 36.9% 10.5% 20.0% 21.7% 14.9% 34.5% 33.3% 21.0% 23.2% 16.9% 21.0% 23.5% 7.7% 25.0% 18.5% 26.2% 22.0% 20.5% CEFH EH CEFH K No Response % 5.3% 2.5% 0.9% 5.6% 1.0% 1.2% 0.4% 2.0% 1.5% 1.6% 1.7% MEAN CDFG D L L STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD ERROR MEDIAN
34 Table 18 Page 29 Q20. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you FULFILL AN EMPLOYER REQUIREMENT? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Top Two Box % 100.0% 67.4% 83.7% 67.9% 80.4% 93.3% 100.0% 78.4% 70.4% 75.0% 100.0% 75.4% 79.6% 68.2% 75.9% 80.6% 77.8% 75.0% 80.6% 76.3% 77.1% 74.7% CEFG CF CEFG JKL 4 - Very Helpful % 100.0% 34.8% 74.4% 35.7% 64.7% 53.3% 100.0% 57.5% 40.7% 50.0% 80.0% 52.3% 58.2% 45.5% 57.1% 50.0% 44.4% 50.0% 58.3% 50.0% 57.1% 53.2% CEFGH CF CF CEFGH 3 - Somewhat Helpful % 32.6% 9.3% 32.1% 15.7% 40.0% 20.9% 29.6% 25.0% 20.0% 23.1% 21.4% 22.7% 18.8% 30.6% 33.3% 25.0% 22.2% 26.3% 20.0% 21.5% EG E E Bottom Two Box % 32.6% 100.0% 16.3% 32.1% 19.6% 6.7% 21.6% 29.6% 25.0% 24.6% 20.4% 31.8% 24.1% 19.4% 22.2% 25.0% 19.4% 23.7% 22.9% 25.3% H CEFGH H 2 - Not Very Helpful % 15.2% 50.0% 4.7% 14.3% 7.8% 6.7% 10.4% 3.7% 18.8% 12.3% 9.2% 9.1% 9.8% 8.3% 22.2% 11.1% 10.5% 8.6% 10.1% 1 - Not At All Helpful % 17.4% 50.0% 11.6% 17.9% 11.8% 11.2% 25.9% 6.2% 12.3% 11.2% 22.7% 14.3% 11.1% 25.0% 8.3% 13.2% 14.3% 15.2% Not applicable % 25.0% 43.9% 73.7% 46.2% 54.0% 20.0% 21.1% 80.0% 36.3% 58.2% 37.9% 66.7% 35.2% 40.5% 61.0% 46.0% 27.5% 30.8% 50.0% 41.5% 36.1% 39.0% 46.4% GH BCEGH GH GH GH J JL NO R
35 Table 18 Page 30 (Continued) Q20. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you FULFILL AN EMPLOYER REQUIREMENT? No Response % 25.0% 15.8% 1.6% 1.5% 0.5% 1.5% 6.9% 5.6% 2.9% 1.2% 1.7% 1.2% 2.0% 3.1% 1.6% 1.7% 1.3% MEAN D CDF CD CD STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD ERROR MEDIAN
36 Table 19 Page 31 Q21. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you FULFILL A PERSONAL INTEREST OR SELF-IMPROVEMENT GOAL? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Top Two Box % 100.0% 96.0% 89.5% 97.4% 98.4% 91.8% 94.4% 100.0% 97.0% 98.4% 84.6% 88.2% 95.0% 96.2% 94.5% 95.4% 95.9% 100.0% 87.5% 96.8% 96.7% 96.3% 94.3% G G Q 4 - Very Helpful % 100.0% 69.3% 63.2% 84.2% 86.9% 65.6% 55.6% 80.0% 77.6% 78.1% 53.8% 70.6% 65.3% 78.0% 81.8% 74.3% 75.5% 61.5% 75.0% 69.4% 73.8% 81.5% 75.2% CDEFGH CGH CDGH L L N N 3 - Somewhat Helpful % 26.7% 26.3% 13.2% 11.5% 26.2% 38.9% 20.0% 19.4% 20.3% 30.8% 17.6% 29.7% 18.2% 12.7% 21.1% 20.4% 38.5% 12.5% 27.4% 23.0% 14.8% 19.1% EF F EF OP Bottom Two Box % 4.0% 10.5% 2.6% 1.6% 8.2% 5.6% 3.0% 1.6% 15.4% 11.8% 5.0% 3.8% 5.5% 4.6% 4.1% 12.5% 3.2% 3.3% 3.7% 5.7% 2 - Not Very Helpful % 1.3% 5.3% 1.3% 1.6% 3.3% 5.6% 1.5% 15.4% 2.0% 2.5% 1.8% 1.7% 4.1% 12.5% 3.7% 3.5% 1 - Not At All Helpful % 2.7% 5.3% 1.3% 4.9% 1.5% 1.6% 11.8% 3.0% 1.3% 3.6% 3.0% 3.2% 3.3% 2.1% Not applicable % 8.5% 5.0% 3.2% 6.2% 5.3% 5.2% 4.5% 10.3% 5.6% 3.8% 5.4% 6.8% 6.0% 3.9% 4.6% 8.5% 6.6%
37 Table 19 Page 32 (Continued) Q21. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you FULFILL A PERSONAL INTEREST OR SELF-IMPROVEMENT GOAL? MEAN DGH CDGH L L N STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD ERROR MEDIAN
38 Table 20 Page 33 Q22. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you EARN CREDITS TO TRANSFER TO ANOTHER COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Top Two Box % 100.0% 98.6% 88.9% 93.9% 93.3% 78.6% 100.0% 100.0% 93.6% 98.0% 80.0% 87.5% 96.3% 90.2% 95.3% 92.2% 93.3% 100.0% 100% 91.8% 93.5% 97.6% 91.1% G G G G G G Q Q 4 - Very Helpful % 100.0% 85.5% 72.2% 71.4% 71.1% 50.0% 84.2% 75.0% 73.2% 81.6% 45.0% 81.2% 79.0% 71.3% 67.4% 69.4% 86.7% 72.7% 66.7% 71.4% 78.3% 78.0% 69.6% CDEFG G G G G L L L Q 3 - Somewhat Helpful % 13.0% 16.7% 22.4% 22.2% 28.6% 15.8% 25.0% 20.4% 16.3% 35.0% 6.2% 17.3% 18.9% 27.9% 22.8% 6.7% 27.3% 33.3% 20.4% 15.2% 19.5% 21.4% M M R Bottom Two Box % 1.4% 11.1% 6.1% 6.7% 21.4% 6.4% 2.0% 20.0% 12.5% 3.7% 9.8% 4.7% 7.8% 6.7% 8.2% 6.5% 2.4% 8.9% CEF 2 - Not Very Helpful % 1.4% 5.6% 2.0% 4.4% 9.5% 3.2% 15.0% 6.2% 3.7% 4.9% 3.3% 6.7% 4.1% 6.5% 2.4% 2.7% 1 - Not At All Helpful % 5.6% 4.1% 2.2% 11.9% 3.2% 2.0% 5.0% 6.2% 4.9% 4.7% 4.4% 4.1% 6.2% Not applicable % 25.0% 15.9% 5.3% 37.5% 27.0% 35.4% 20.0% 25.9% 25.4% 27.6% 11.1% 21.9% 26.8% 27.1% 27.8% 11.8% 15.4% 25.0% 24.6% 24.6% 30.5% 24.5% CD D CD R
39 Table 20 Page 34 (Continued) Q22. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you EARN CREDITS TO TRANSFER TO ANOTHER COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY? Don't know % 1.2% 1.5% 0.6% 0.4% 0.7% No Response % 1.6% 3.4% 1.0% 0.4% 0.7% MEAN DEFG G G G L L STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD ERROR MEDIAN
BC Tech Co- op Grants Program Guidelines
BC Tech Co- op Grants Program Guidelines BC Tech Co- op Grants Program The BC Innovation Council (BCIC) is pleased to offer the BC Tech Co- op Grants Program, a two- year collaborative initiative to support
More informationNSSE 2017 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons NSSEville State University NSSEID:
NSSE Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons University NSSEID: 888888 NSSE Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons About This Report The Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons report presents item-by-item
More informationNSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons NSSEville State University NSSEID:
NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons NSSEID: 888888 About This Report The Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons report presents item-by-item student responses and statistical comparisons
More informationNSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons California State University San Marcos IPEDS:
NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons IPEDS: 366711 About This Report The Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons report presents item-by-item student responses and statistical comparisons
More informationCRACIUN RESEARCH. June 20, 2011 A M A R K E T R E S E A R C H S T CHA
CRACIUN RESEARCH A M A R K E T R E S E A R C H S T U D Y CHA June 20, 2011 Craciun Research Anchorage. Seattle. Washington, DC 907.279.3982 www.craciunresearch.com 2011 Craciun Research. All rights reserved.
More informationAPPENDIX B: DATA TABLES
APPENDIX B: DATA TABLES PHILOSOPHY STUDENT SURVEY TABLES Q1. Were or are you... Valid Majoring in Philosophy 18 45.0 45.0 45.0 Minoring in Philosophy 22 55.0 55.0 100.0 100.0 Q2. Did you have a particular
More informationNSSE Senior Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Illinois State University
- Senior Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen,
More informationRider Satisfaction Survey Total Market 2006
Rider Satisfaction Survey Total Market 2006 Prepared For: Valley Metro Fall 2006 2702 North 44 th Street Suite 100-A. Phoenix, Arizona 85008 602-707-0050 www.westgroupresearch.com Valley Metro 2006 Rider
More informationNSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons University of South Carolina Aiken
NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Office of Institutional iveness, Research & Compliance Director: Lloyd A. Dawe, Ph.D. IPEDS: 218645 About This Report The Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons
More informationNSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Regent University
Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some cells appear
More informationNSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons
NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons University of New Hampshire
NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons California State University Chico
NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationCabrillo College Transportation Study
Cabrillo College Transportation Study Planning and Research Office Terrence Willett, Research Analyst, Principle Author Jing Luan, Director of Planning and Research Judy Cassada, Research Specialist Shirley
More informationNSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons
NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Emporia State University
NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Emporia State University
NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons
NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons New Mexico State University
NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons West Texas A&M University
NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons University of Wisconsin-Whitewater
NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2018 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons
NSSE 2018 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2018 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons
NSSE 2018 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Eastern Kentucky University
NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationConfidence Interval Notes Calculating Confidence Intervals
Confidence Interval Notes Calculating Confidence Intervals Calculating One-Population Mean Confidence Intervals for Quantitative Data It is always best to use a computer program to make these calculations,
More informationBCLC Employee Survey Final Report. August 31, 2016
BCLC Employee Survey Final Report August 31, 2016 BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY Survey Background Canadian research indicates that gaming workers exhibit rates of problem gambling that are over three times
More informationAAMPO Regional Transportation Attitude Survey
AAMPO Regional Transportation Attitude Survey Traditionally Underserved Populations helping organizations make better decisions since 1982 2018 Submitted to the AAMPO By: ETC Institute 725 W. Frontier
More informationBaruch College. Federal Work-Study Supervisor Orientation
Baruch College Federal Work-Study Supervisor Orientation Program Overview Topics How to Hire Work-Study Students Policies & Procedures FWS Supervisor Responsibilities Program Overview What is Federal Work-Study?
More informationConseil de développement économique des Territoires du Nord-Ouest Quebec Travel conversion study 2008 Report May 26, 2009
Conseil de développement économique des Territoires du Nord-Ouest Quebec Travel conversion study 2008 Report May 26, 2009 226-388 donald street winnipeg manitoba canada R3B 2J4 204.989.8002 fax 204.989.8048
More informationAmerica s Brightest ORANGE
America s Brightest ORANGE Oklahoma State University 2013 Survey of Alumni of Graduate Programs Jeremy Penn, Ph.D. Director Mark Nicholas, Ph.D. Assistant Director John Hathcoat, Ph.D. Statistical Analyst
More informationMarist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax
Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Phone 845.575.5050 Fax 845.575.5111 www.maristpoll.marist.edu Majority Thinks Colleges Break NCAA Rules Most Say Only Scholarships for
More information2014 Ontario Works Transit Survey: Final Results
2014 Ontario Works Transit Survey: Final Results Irena Pozgaj-Jones, Project Manager, Transportation September 2014 Overview Background Survey Purpose and Objectives Methodology Respondent Demographics
More informationRider Satisfaction Survey Phoenix Riders 2004
Rider Satisfaction Survey Riders Prepared For: Valley Metro Spring 2720 E. Thomas Rd. Bldg. A, Arizona 85016-8296 602-707-0050 answers@westgroupresearch.com Valley Metro Rider Satisfaction Survey - Page
More informationRegional Dial-a-Ride Passenger Survey Report
Regional Dial-a-Ride Passenger Survey Report December 2011 Prepared for: Dial-a-Ride Study December 2011 Page i Table of Contents Section: Page #: Executive Summary... ii I. Introduction...1 A. Background
More informationSALARY SURVEY OF SCRUM PROFESSIONALS sponsored by scrum alliance
SALARY SURVEY OF SCRUM PROFESSIONALS 2017-2018 sponsored by TABLE OF CONTENTS 03 WELCOME FROM BENNIE COVINGTON 04 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 06 ENTRY TO SCRUM 07 EDUCATION 08 GROWTH OF SCRUM PRACTICE 09 EXPERIENCED
More informationGAMBLING BEHAVIORS AND PERCEPTIONS OF THE EFFECTS OF GAMBLING IN THE LEHIGH VALLEY 2009 SURVEY OF RESIDENTS. February 2010
GAMBLING BEHAVIORS AND PERCEPTIONS OF THE EFFECTS OF GAMBLING IN THE LEHIGH VALLEY 2009 SURVEY OF RESIDENTS February 2010 Prepared by Michele Moser Deegan, Ph.D. Director Lehigh Valley Research Consortium
More informationTHE AP-GfK POLL March, 2016
Public Affairs & Corporate Communications THE AP-GfK POLL March, 2016 Conducted by GfK Public Affairs & Corporate Communications A survey of the American general population (ages 18+) Interview dates:
More informationPercentage of Respondents Strongly Agree/Agree
Fitchburg State University Campus Climate Survey 218 Department of Humanities University Students: White n=148, Non-White n=36 Interdisciplinary Studies Students: White n=8, Non-White n=1 Part I: Welcoming
More informationCentral Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results
Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results Table of Contents Public Surveys for Deer Goal Setting... 1 Methods... 1 Hunter Survey... 2 Demographics... 2 Population
More informationLAPEER MICHIGAN WITHHOLDING TAX GUIDE
CITY OF LAPEER INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT 576 LIBERTY PARK LAPEER MI 48446 LAPEER MICHIGAN WITHHOLDING TAX GUIDE WHO MUST WITHHOLD Every employer who: has a location in the city; is doing business in the city
More informationChittenden County Regional Planning Commission Transportation Survey
Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission Transportation Survey Report of Results November 8, 2012 Submitted by Resource Systems Group 180 Battery Street, Suite 350 Burlington, Vermont 05401 TEL 802.
More informationCustomer Acquisition Pay-Plan
Customer Acquisition Pay-Plan A New YOU Starts TODAY... With Anovité Our Compensation Plan The Anovite compensation plan was designed to provide you with multiple streams of income. With the Anovite opportunity,
More informationOur Compensation Plan
A NEW YOU! Our Compensation Plan The Anovite compensation plan was designed to provide you with multiple streams of income. With the Anovite opportunity, you get to choose how big your business will become.
More informationNorthwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results
Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results Table of Contents Public Surveys for Deer Goal Setting... 1 Methods... 1 Hunter Survey... 2 Demographics... 2 Population
More informationOregon State Lottery Behavior & Attitude Tracking Study
Oregon State Lottery Behavior & Attitude Tracking Study Presentation of Findings November 2012 Wave Prepared by: Topics Covered Brief Overview of Objectives and Methodology Key Trends Related to: Attitudes
More informationNFL1. Do you think television shows, in general, are getting better or getting worse?
1350 Willow Rd, Suite 102 Menlo Park, CA 94025 www.knowledgenetworks.com Interview dates: January 21 January 26, 2011 Total Interviews: 1,125 adults NFL Fans: 482 adults Sampling margin of error for a
More informationOur Compensation Plan A NEW YOU!
Our Compensation Plan A NEW YOU! The Anovite compensation plan was designed to provide you with multiple streams of income. With the Anovite opportunity, you get to choose how big your business will become.
More informationClarkson University: Report on Athletic Program Participation Rates and Financial Support Data July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016
: Report on Athletic Program Participation Rates and Financial Support Data July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016 This report is published in compliance with the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act. Number of Full
More informationClarkson University: Report on Athletic Program Participation Rates and Financial Support Data July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018
: Report on Athletic Program Participation Rates and Financial Support Data July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018 This report is published in compliance with the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act. Number of Full
More informationClarkson University: Report on Athletic Program Participation Rates and Financial Support Data July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
: Report on Athletic Program Participation Rates and Financial Support Data July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017 This report is published in compliance with the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act. Number of Full
More informationFALL The Office of Institutional Effectiveness
FALL 2013 The Office of Institutional Effectiveness 11/14/2013 SUMMARY/ABSTRACT RSTC Office of Institutional Effectiveness conducted the Fall 2013 Student Opinion Survey (SOS) beginning on September 19,
More informationlapopsurveys.org Síganos en
lapopsurveys.org Síganos en AmericasBarometer Brief: Ecuador 2016/17 In Depressed Times, Support for the Incumbent Slips While Support for Democracy Declines Dr. J. Daniel Montalvo, LAPOP Program Manager
More information2020 K Street NW, Suite 410 Washington, DC (202)
2020 K Street NW, Suite 410 Washington, DC 20006 (202) 463-7300 Interview dates: October 24 25, 2013 Interviews: 1,008 adults CONDUCTED BY IPSOS PUBLIC AFFAIRS These are findings of an Ipsos online poll
More informationU.S. Bicycling Participation Study
U.S. Bicycling Participation Study Report of findings from the 2016 survey Conducted by Corona Insights Commissioned by PeopleForBikes Released July 2017 Table of Contents Background and Objectives 3 Research
More informationModal Shift in the Boulder Valley 1990 to 2009
Modal Shift in the Boulder Valley 1990 to 2009 May 2010 Prepared for the City of Boulder by National Research Center, Inc. 3005 30th Street Boulder, CO 80301 (303) 444-7863 www.n-r-c.com Table of Contents
More informationTHE AP-GfK POLL July, 2016
Public Affairs & Corporate Communications THE AP-GfK POLL July, 2016 Conducted by GfK Public Affairs & Corporate Communications A survey of the American general population (ages 18+) Interview dates: July
More informationINSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES July 2016 Table of Contents National American University Mission...2 Purposes...2 Core Values...3 Institutional Review Board Policy...4 IRB Membership...6 Training...7
More informationThe National Citizen Survey. Bowling Green, KY. Technical Appendices
The National Citizen Survey Bowling Green, KY Technical Appendices 2014 National Research Center, Inc. Boulder, CO International City/County Management Association Washington, DC Contents Appendix A: Complete
More informationCobb Community Transit
Cobb Community Transit Ridership Survey January 2014 1 Methodology Paper survey of 315 CCT riders 165 on local routes (margin of sampling error: ± 7.6%) 150 on express routes (margin of sampling error:
More informationTopline Results Telephone Poll March 2013
Topline Results Telephone Poll March 2013 Results are based on interviews with 1001 London residents aged 18+. Interviews were carried out by telephone between 7 th 12 th March 2013. A representative sample
More informationBowling Green, KY Technical Appendices
Bowling Green, KY Technical Appendices 2018 2955 Valmont Road Suite 300 777 North Capitol Street NE Suite 500 Boulder, Colorado 80301 Washington, DC 20002 n-r-c.com 303-444-7863 icma.org 800-745-8780 Contents
More informationWildlife Ad Awareness & Attitudes Survey 2015
Wildlife Ad Awareness & Attitudes Survey 2015 Contents Executive Summary 3 Key Findings: 2015 Survey 8 Comparison between 2014 and 2015 Findings 27 Methodology Appendix 41 2 Executive Summary and Key Observations
More information2014 Entering Freshman Survey
2014 Entering Freshman Survey Content Methodology Background Profile High School Experiences Expected First-Year Experiences Other Methodology aimed to collect information about entering students background,
More informationThe International Coach Federation (ICF) Global Consumer Awareness Study
www.pwc.com The International Coach Federation (ICF) Global Consumer Awareness Study Key Results and Main Messages Fort Worth, Texas Presentation Structure 2 Research Overview 3 Research objectives To
More informationInternet Technology Fundamentals. To use a passing score at the percentiles listed below:
Internet Technology Fundamentals To use a passing score at the percentiles listed below: PASS candidates with this score or HIGHER: 2.90 High Scores Medium Scores Low Scores Percentile Rank Proficiency
More informationCharacteristics of the Labor Force - Poteau Area
Not Not Number of respondents 275 42 614 71 543 391 55 Estimated Adults 21,257 2,956 47,302 5,554 41,747 29,188 3,881 Males 54.5 30.2 54.1 51.6 54.4 38.8 29.4 Females 45.5 69.8 45.9 48.4 45.6 61.2 70.6
More information1. The data below gives the eye colors of 20 students in a Statistics class. Make a frequency table for the data.
1. The data below gives the eye colors of 20 students in a Statistics class. Make a frequency table for the data. Green Blue Brown Blue Blue Brown Blue Blue Blue Green Blue Brown Blue Brown Brown Blue
More informationFinal Report, October 19, Socioeconomic characteristics of reef users
Socioeconomic Study of Reefs in Southeast Florida - Executive Summary By Hazen and Sawyer in association with Florida State University and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, October 19, 2001
More informationA comment on recent events, and...
A comment on recent events, and... where we are in the current economic cycle November 15, 2016 Mark Schniepp Director Likely Trump Policies $4 to $5 Trillion in tax cuts over 10 years to corporations,
More informationTRIATHLON BUSINESS INTERNATIONAL (TBI)
TRIATHLON BUSINESS INTERNATIONAL (TBI) RESPONDENT SUMMARY DATA TRIATHLON INDUSTRY CONFIDENCE INDEX 16 Prepared by MultiSport Research Jan-Feb, 16 TBI TRIATHLON INDUSTRY CONFIDENCE INDEX 16 TBI USA Industry
More informationLiverpool Lime Street station engineering work. Knowledge and support for October 2017 improvement work November 2017
Liverpool Lime Street station engineering work Knowledge and support for October 2017 improvement work November 2017 Overview before the engineering work starts On 30 September work began at Liverpool
More informationSatisfaction with getting to work 56% 15% 6% 6% Total distance travelled. miles per week
Page/... Headlines Emersons Green Travel to Work Survey March 0 Number of respondents Main modes of travel (%) 0% Satisfaction with getting to work % % Satisfaction with getting % % % (driver with others/
More informationIn 2018 a total of 56,127 students received an ATAR, 934 fewer than in The gender balance was similar to 2017.
ATAR 2018 Preliminary report on the Scaling of the 2018 NSW Higher School Certificate This preliminary report has been prepared to provide some information on the calculation of the Australian Tertiary
More informationGambling Involvement and Problem Gambling in Manitoba. April 2002
Gambling Involvement and Problem Gambling in Manitoba April 2002 Gambling Involvement and Problem Gambling in Manitoba April 2002 Addictions Foundation of Manitoba David Patton, PhD David Brown, PhD Jastej
More informationSatisfaction with getting to work 54% 14% 6% 5% Total distance travelled. miles per week
Page/... Travel to Work Survey March 0 Headlines South Gloucestershire LA Area Number of respondents Main modes of travel (%) Satisfaction with getting to work % Satisfaction with getting % (driver with
More informationPlurality Approve of Fed Response to Saudi Arabia
Plurality Approve of Fed Response Saudi Arabia Half about the dispute s effect on Canada Toron, August 13 th, 2018 In a random sampling of public opinion taken by The Forum Poll among 1777 Canadian voters,
More informationResults of the Campus Travel Survey
Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-13-18 Results of the 2012-13 Campus Travel Survey September 2013 Brigitte K. Driller Institute of Transportation Studies University of California, Davis 1605 Tilia Street Davis,
More informationMYRTLE BEACH ELEMENTARY th Avenue North Myrtle Beach, South. 2-3 Elementary School
MYRTLE BEACH ELEMENTARY 620 29th Avenue North Myrtle Beach, South Grades Enrollment 2-3 Elementary School 661 Students Principal Janice L. Christy 843-448-1774 Superintendent Dr. Cynthia Elsberry 843-488-6700
More informationSatisfaction with Canada Line and Connecting Buses. Wave 2
Satisfaction with Canada Line and Connecting Buses March 10, 2011 Prepared by: NRG Research Group Wave 2 Suite 1380-1100 Melville Street Vancouver, BC V6E 4A6 Table of Contents Summary... 3 Method.. 8
More informationMater Dei High School 1202 West Edinger Avenue Santa Ana, California /
Mater Dei High School 1202 West Edinger Avenue Santa Ana, California 92707-2191 714 / 754-7711 Questions on Athletics and Academics Athletics Describe the preferred, invited and uninvited walk-on process.
More informationMrs. Daniel- AP Stats Ch. 2 MC Practice
Mrs. Daniel- AP Stats Ch. 2 MC Practice Name: 1. Jorge s score on Exam 1 in his statistics class was at the 64th percentile of the scores for all students. His score falls (a) between the minimum and the
More informationAd Hoc Committee on Plus/Minus Grading, Final Report August 2003
Ad Hoc Committee on Plus/Minus Grading, 2002-2003 Final Report August 2003 Ad Hoc Committee on Plus/Minus Grading: Thom Fisher, Ph.D. (Chair), Meredith Wells, Ph.D., James Wells, Ph.D., Daniel Thorne,
More informationStudies in non-standard employment in Canada
Studies in non-standard employment in Canada Geoff Bowlby, Director, Labour Statistics Division November 1, 2008 Defining non-standard employment According to Krahn s broad definition of non-standard employment
More informationAN ASSESSMENT OF NEW JERSEY DEER HUNTER OPINION ON EXPANDING ANTLER POINT RESTRICTION (APR) REGULATIONS IN DEER MANAGEMENT ZONES 28, 30, 31, 34 AND 47
AN ASSESSMENT OF NEW JERSEY DEER HUNTER OPINION ON EXPANDING ANTLER POINT RESTRICTION (APR) REGULATIONS IN DEER MANAGEMENT ZONES 28, 30, 31, 34 AND 47 Survey mailed: April 2010 Data analyzed: June 2010
More informationCycling Master Plan Community Engagement Session WELCOME
Cycling Master Plan Community Engagement Session WELCOME WHY COMMUNITIES PLAN Considering Short Term and Long Term Needs City of Lethbridge is committed to planning - to determine short term goals along
More informationB. Single Taxpayers (122,401 obs.) A. Married Taxpayers Filing jointly (266,272 obs.) Density Distribution. Density Distribution
A. Married Taxpayers Filing jointly (266,272 obs.) Kink 15/28% at $43,850 B. Single Taxpayers (122,401 obs.) Kink 15/28% at $26,250 Density Distribution Density Distribution $0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000
More informationDecember 5-8, 2013 Total N= December 4-15, 2013 Uninsured N = 702
POLL December 5-8, 2013 Total N= 1000 December 4-15, 2013 Uninsured N = 702 All trends are from New York Times/CBS News polls unless otherwise noted. Asterisk indicates registered respondents only. 1.
More informationWYDOT Customer Satisfaction Survey 2016
February 16 th, 2017 WYDOT Customer Satisfaction Survey 2016 Presenting results of the WYDOT Customer Satisfaction Survey, 2016 Presented By Brian Harnisch Senior Research Scientist Wyoming Survey & Analysis
More informationSatisfaction with getting to work 55% 17% 8% 7% Total distance travelled. miles per week
Page/... Headlines North Bristol Suscom Travel to Work Survey March 0 Number of respondents 0 Main modes of travel (%) % Satisfaction with getting to work % % % % Satisfaction with getting % % (driver
More informationDKS & WASHINGTON COUNTY Washington County Transportation Survey
PREPARED FOR: DKS & WASHINGTON COUNTY Washington County Transportation Survey April 2013 PREPARED BY: DHM RESEARCH (503) 220-0575 239 NW 13 th Ave., #205, Portland, OR 97209 www.dhmresearch.com 1 INTRODUCTION
More informationCalgary Christian School
Calgary Christian School Mission Statement Calgary Christian School is a community, called and dedicated to integrate faith and learning, reaching for excellence in equipping responsive citizens of God
More informationDowntown Tampa Parking User Survey
Downtown Tampa Parking User Survey 2017 Introduction This Downtown Tampa Parking User Survey was commissioned by the Tampa Downtown Partnership and carried out by Plan Hillsborough. The survey was overseen
More information2009 National Pharmacist Workforce Study. Visual Data
2009 National Pharmacist Workforce Study Visual Data Figure 1.1: National Aggregate g Demand Index Values http://www.pharmacymanpower.com/ 5 4 3 4.28 4.07 Shortage Surplus 4.19 4.07 4.02 3.97 3.92 4.21
More informationTable of Contents
February 2018 Table of Contents Executive Summary Executive Summary Personas Activists Barriers Motivations Needs In The Wind Barriers Motivations Needs Hunting Buddies Barriers Motivations Needs Strategic
More informationFEDERAL WORK-STUDY PROGRAM ON-CAMPUS EMPLOYMENT GUIDE
FEDERAL WORK-STUDY PROGRAM ON-CAMPUS EMPLOYMENT GUIDE UC Merced Federal Work-Study On-Campus Employment Guide (updated 7/23/14) Page 1 FWS Program Overview The Federal Work-Study Program (FWS) is a federally
More informationUK Pavement Management System. Technical Note 45. Data Topic guidance notes for UKPMS Developers. Version Number 2.00 Issue
UK Pavement Management System Technical Note 45 Data Topic 130-02 guidance notes for UKPMS Developers Version Number 2.00 Issue February 2019 Document Information Title (Sub Title) Technical Note 45 Data
More informationWhat HQ2 Finalist Cities Think about Amazon Moving to Town. Table of Contents
What HQ2 Finalist Cities Think about Amazon Moving to Town Survey of Adult Residents in U.S. Finalist MSAs In Partnership with the Business Journals March 30 th April 3 rd, 2018 Table of Contents SURVEY
More informationOVERVIEW OF METHODOLOGY
I N T R O D U C T I O N The Orange County Transportation Authority () is the county transportation commission responsible for planning, funding and delivering transportation improvements in Orange County
More informationGENDER PAY GAP REPORT
GENDER PAY GAP REPORT ABERDEEN FOOTBALL CLUB plc Company Number SC005364 GENDER PAY GAP REPORT This report contains important information on Aberdeen Football Club s (Club) gender pay gap as required by
More information