Office of Institutional Research And Planning

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Office of Institutional Research And Planning"

Transcription

1 Office of Institutional Research And Planning Ivy Tech Graduate Survey Data Tabulations Results by Region Region H: Central Indiana May 2011 Prepared by Research & Marketing Insight, Inc.

2 How to Use These Tables The tabulation banners show the raw numbers, frequencies (percentages), and other statistics for the survey. The first column is the total for all survey respondents. The data are unweighted. The columns to the right of the Total column represent raw data, frequencies, and other statistics for selected subgroups that will be used in the analysis. Each column has an upper-case letter positioned underneath the column title. As you look at the tables, you will see that some percentages and means have letters positioned below them. These letters show that the particular result is statistically significantly greater than the data in the designated columns. The cutoff, or confidence level, set for the statistical tests is 95%. This means that if you repeated this survey 100 times, 95 out of the 100 times you would receive a result within one standard deviation from this survey s response for that item. The footnote after each table indicates which columns have been tested against each other. For example: Assume 70.6% of respondents in the Fine Arts and Design division (column B) and 57.8% of respondents in the Business division (column C) cited Personal interest or self-improvement as an educational objective they hoped to accomplish by attending Ivy Tech. In the tab banner, assume Fine Arts and Design s 70.6% has a C beneath it. This means that the proportion of respondents in the Fine Arts and Design division is significantly higher than the proportion of respondents in the Business division who wished to accomplish this objective by attending Ivy Tech. The Base for each question represents the total number of possible respondents for that question. The base size may vary depending on who is eligible to respond to a given question, and who actually responds. As a rule, those who do not respond, or say they don t know, are not included in the base. The top number for each item represents the actual number of people giving that answer. The bottom number shows the percentage of the base those respondents represent. While percentages are rounded to the first decimal point in the tables, we have rounded to the nearest whole number for reports. For some questions on the survey, respondents were permitted to provide more than one answer. The percentages may greatly exceed 100 if you add the numbers in the column for these items.

3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table 1 Page 1...Q2. Which of the following educational objectives did you hope to accomplish by attending Ivy Tech? Table 2 Page 3...Q3. Did you achieve your Ivy Tech educational objectives upon graduating from the College? Table 3 Page 4...Q4. Why were your Ivy Tech educational objectives not achieved upon graduation? Table 4 Page 6...Q5. Which of the following best describes your current employment status? Table 5 Page 7...Q6. How satisfied are you with your current position? Table 6 Page 9...Q7. How related is your current position to the education you received at Ivy Tech? Table 7 Page 10...Q8. Are you actively seeking a different position? Table 8 Page 11...Q10. What was your status with your current employer either prior to or during enrollment at Ivy Tech? Table 9 Page 13...Q11. After graduation, did your job require you to move...? Table 10 Page 14...Q12. How much, if any, FULL-TIME work experience of ANY TYPE (excluding internships) did you have prior to graduating from Ivy Tech? Table 11 Page 16...Q13. How much, if any, FULL-TIME work experience IN THE FIELD OF YOUR CURRENT JOB did you have prior to graduating from Ivy Tech? Table 12 Page 17...Q14. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE TO ENTER OR RE-ENTER THE JOB MARKET? Table 13 Page 19...Q15. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you IMPROVE SKILLS FOR YOUR CURRENT JOB? Table 14 Page 21...Q16. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE FOR A SALARY INCREASE AT YOUR CURRENT EMPLOYER? Table 15 Page 23...Q17. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE FOR A PROMOTION OPPORTUNITY AT YOUR CURRENT EMPLOYER? Table 16 Page 25...Q18. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE FOR A NEW POSITION WITH A DIFFERENT EMPLOYER IN THE SAME FIELD? Table 17 Page 27...Q19. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE TO CHANGE CAREERS? Table 18 Page 29...Q20. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you FULFILL AN EMPLOYER REQUIREMENT? Table 19 Page 31...Q21. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you FULFILL A PERSONAL INTEREST OR SELF-IMPROVEMENT GOAL? Table 20 Page 33...Q22. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you EARN CREDITS TO TRANSFER TO ANOTHER COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY? Table 21 Page 35...Q23. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE TO EARN A PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION? Table 22 Page 37...Q14-Q23. Top Two Box Summary Table. Table 23 Page 39...Q14-Q23. Bottom Two Box Summary Table. Table 24 Page 41...Q14-Q23. Mean Summary Table.

4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table 25 Page 43...Q24. How has your salary changed since you graduated from Ivy Tech? Table 26 Page 44...Q25. What percentage increase in total compensation have you received since you graduated from Ivy Tech? Table 27 Page 45...Q27. Which of the following best represents your current education status? Table 28 Page 46...Q28. Which college or university are you attending? Table 29 Page 49...Q29. How would you rate the overall education and training you received at Ivy Tech? Table 30 Page 50...Q30. Did you participate in an internship through an employer for which you earned college credit while enrolled at Ivy Tech? This internship could have been a paid or unpaid opportunity. Table 31 Page 51...Q31. How beneficial was this internship in helping you obtain full-time employment? Table 32 Page 53...Q32. Which of the following resources of Ivy Tech's Career Services have you used? Table 33 Page 56...Q33. Did you need to use any resources offered by career services? Table 34 Page 57...Q34. Were you aware that Ivy Tech graduates may use its career services resources at any time after graduation? Table 35 Page 58...Q35. What is your current annual base salary, not including benefits, commissions, bonuses, or other incentives? Table 36 Page 60...Q36. Which of the following ranges best describes your current annual base salary, not including benefits, commissions, bonuses, or other incentives? Table 37 Page 62...Q35/36. What is your current annual base salary, not including benefits, commissions, bonuses, or other incentives? Table 38 Page 64...Q37. Please indicate the extent to which you agree with the following statement. - INCREASING DIVERSITY AMONG FACULTY, STAFF, AND STUDENTS SHOULD BE A FOCUS FOR THE COLLEGE. Table 39 Page 66...Q38. Please indicate the extent to which you agree with the following statement. - YOUR OVERALL IVY TECH EXPERI HELPED YOU LEARN HOW TO INTERACT EFFECTIVELY WITH PERSONS OF BACKGROUNDS, CULTURES, AND PERSPECTIVES DIFFERENT FROM YOUR OWN. Table 40 Page 68...Q39. Please indicate the extent to which you agree with the following statement. - YOUR OVERALL IVY TECH EXPERI HELPED YOU LEARN TO LOOK BEYOND YOUR LOCAL PERSPECTIVE TO BECOME A GLOBAL CITIZEN. Table 41 Page 70...Q40. Approximately how many hours, if any, in a typical month do you volunteer your time and talents through a for-profit, not-forprofit, or faith based service organization? Table 42 Page 72...Q41. Do you have any additional feedback or suggestions for Ivy Tech that you would like to share? Table 43 Page 82...Q42. Would you like to be entered into the drawing for a chance to win one of five $100 Target gift cards? Table 44 Page 83...Region. Table 45 Page 84...School. Table 46 Page 86...Gender.

5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table 47 Page 87...Degree Type. Table 48 Page 88...Age of Graduate. Table 49 Page 89...Ethnicity.

6 Table 1 Page 1 Q2. Which of the following educational objectives did you hope to accomplish by attending Ivy Tech? BASE: TOTAL UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Completing an Ivy Tech degree/technical 83.0% 100.0% 82.7% 63.2% 85.0% 84.1% 84.6% 89.5% 60.0% 85.8% 77.6% 75.9% 82.4% 89.4% 78.0% 86.4% 83.7% 84.3% 76.9% 75.0% 85.9% 90.2% 78.0% 80.8% certificate program CDEFG D O Personal interest or self improvement 76.2% 100.0% 80.2% 57.9% 72.5% 81.0% 73.8% 78.9% 80.0% 77.8% 73.1% 65.5% 82.4% 81.7% 75.6% 67.8% 74.9% 80.4% 76.9% 87.5% 75.0% 80.3% 74.6% 76.2% CDEFGH Preparing to enter or re enter the job market 61.0% 75.0% 44.4% 26.3% 71.2% 63.5% 78.5% 42.1% 100.0% 58.5% 58.2% 82.8% 58.8% 68.3% 57.7% 59.3% 62.9% 60.8% 61.5% 50.0% 68.8% 72.1% 57.6% 55.0% D CDH CD CDH CDEFGH JK X Earning credits to transfer to another college/ 53.9% 50.0% 67.9% 73.7% 41.2% 50.8% 35.4% 100.0% 60.0% 52.4% 61.2% 37.9% 82.4% 57.7% 55.4% 45.8% 51.4% 66.7% 69.2% 62.5% 59.4% 54.1% 50.8% 52.3% university EFG EG BCDEFG L JL Q Preparing to change careers % 25.0% 56.8% 47.4% 72.5% 55.6% 23.1% 47.4% 80.0% 52.8% 61.2% 44.8% 29.4% 46.2% 54.2% 61.0% 52.6% 54.9% 61.5% 50.0% 48.4% 50.8% 54.2% 54.3% G BCDFGH G G M M Improving skills for your current job 40.8% 25.0% 35.8% 15.8% 28.8% 34.9% 80.0% 36.8% 47.6% 25.4% 44.8% 29.4% 37.5% 44.0% 35.6% 40.2% 39.2% 46.2% 37.5% 37.5% 44.3% 39.0% 41.7% D BCDEFH K

7 Table 1 Page 2 (Continued) Q2. Which of the following educational objectives did you hope to accomplish by attending Ivy Tech? Preparing for a salary increase at your current 33.0% 25.0% 27.2% 21.1% 30.0% 17.5% 64.6% 36.8% 40.6% 14.9% 34.5% 11.8% 31.7% 37.5% 25.4% 33.9% 35.3% 38.5% 12.5% 26.6% 42.6% 30.5% 33.1% employer CDEFH KM K Preparing for a promotion opportunity at your current 27.7% 25.0% 30.9% 15.8% 23.8% 15.9% 47.7% 21.1% 33.5% 11.9% 27.6% 11.8% 28.8% 29.2% 23.7% 29.1% 25.5% 38.5% 21.9% 34.4% 33.9% 25.2% employer F CDEFH KM Fulfilling an employer requirement 21.4% 19.8% 12.5% 9.5% 50.8% 36.8% 23.1% 9.0% 41.4% 17.6% 21.2% 25.0% 11.9% 21.5% 23.5% 30.8% 29.7% 19.7% 23.7% 17.9% CEF EF K K P Preparing for a new position with a different 20.8% 25.0% 18.5% 5.3% 16.2% 17.5% 32.3% 42.1% 23.6% 13.4% 24.1% 17.6% 25.0% 18.5% 18.6% 19.1% 25.5% 30.8% 12.5% 23.4% 26.2% 20.3% 17.9% employer in the same field D DEF DEF K Completing an apprenticeship program 14.6% 3.7% 2.5% 3.2% 61.5% 10.5% 13.7% 10.4% 41.4% 5.9% 10.6% 20.8% 5.1% 15.1% 11.8% 23.1% 25.0% 17.2% 13.1% 20.3% 11.9% CEFH JKM NP Preparing to earn a professional certification 14.3% 22.2% 11.2% 12.7% 16.9% 10.5% 13.2% 14.9% 20.7% 11.8% 14.4% 15.5% 8.5% 12.4% 15.7% 30.8% 28.1% 6.6% 16.9% 10.6% VX No Response % 1.2% 5.6% 1.0% 0.4% 1.5%

8 Table 2 Page 3 Q3. Did you achieve your Ivy Tech educational objectives upon graduating from the College? BASE: TOTAL UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Yes % 100.0% 86.4% 94.4% 97.4% 96.8% 92.2% 94.7% 100.0% 94.7% 92.3% 79.3% 100.0% 95.1% 93.3% 91.4% 93.9% 92.2% 92.3% 87.5% 96.9% 90.0% 96.6% 91.9% CG C C CG L JKL No % 13.6% 5.6% 2.6% 3.2% 7.8% 5.3% 5.3% 7.7% 20.7% 4.9% 6.7% 8.6% 6.1% 7.8% 7.7% 12.5% 3.1% 10.0% 3.4% 8.1% EF J Don't know/unsure % 1.2% 1.5% 0.5% 1.5% 1.0% 0.6% 0.8% 1.7% 0.7% Refused % 1.2% 5.3% 1.2% 1.6% 0.9% 1.5% 1.0% 1.2% 1.7% 1.6% 1.5% 1.6% 1.3%

9 Table 3 Page 4 Q4. Why were your Ivy Tech educational objectives not achieved upon graduation? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Not yet obtaining employment 59.1% 72.7% 100.0% 50.0% 40.0% 100.0% 36.4% 60.0% 100.0% 40.0% 63.6% 80.0% 60.0% 50.0% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 33.3% 100% 58.3% CG CG J QR QR VX VX A transfer to another university that has not 18.2% 9.1% 50.0% 20.0% 100.0% 9.1% 40.0% 16.7% 40.0% 9.1% 20.0% 20.0% 100% 50.0% 33.3% 8.3% happened yet CG Q Financial reasons % 50.0% 40.0% 100.0% 18.2% 40.0% 20.0% 18.2% 20.0% 13.3% 25.0% 100% 50.0% 33.3% 8.3% G QR Personal reasons % 9.1% 100.0% 100.0% 18.2% 20.0% 16.7% 20.0% 9.1% 20.0% 13.3% 100% 50.0% 16.7% 50.0% 8.3% C C Q An intent to complete another degree at Ivy Tech 13.6% 9.1% 50.0% 100.0% 9.1% 40.0% 18.2% 20.0% 13.3% 100% 50.0% 16.7% 8.3% C Q Have not found a better job/ not gotten a promotion 4.5% 9.1% 20.0% 20.0% 6.7% 16.7%

10 Table 3 Page 5 (Continued) Q4. Why were your Ivy Tech educational objectives not achieved upon graduation? Economy % 9.1% 9.1% 9.1% 6.7% 50.0% Problems with Ivy Tech % 100.0% 20.0% 20.0% 100% 50.0% Degree not enough/need work experience 4.5% 20.0% 9.1% 9.1% 25.0% 8.3% Other % 18.2% 9.1% 20.0% 9.1% 20.0% 13.3% 16.7%

11 Table 4 Page 6 Q5. Which of the following best describes your current employment status? BASE: TOTAL UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Employed full-time (35 or more hours per week) 63.1% 50.0% 62.2% 36.8% 72.5% 56.5% 67.7% 57.9% 80.0% 100.0% 52.4% 72.0% 56.9% 62.7% 70.0% 69.2% 50.0% 47.7% 60.7% 64.4% 70.7% D DF D D NP U Employed part-time % 25.0% 22.0% 36.8% 20.0% 25.8% 7.7% 21.1% 100.0% 30.5% 11.9% 24.1% 20.2% 12.0% 23.1% 50.0% 35.4% 24.6% 18.6% 12.0% G G G G O O R WX X Temporary employment % 25.0% 2.4% 5.3% 5.0% 3.2% 4.8% 2.4% 1.7% 3.2% 2.0% 3.1% 3.3% 5.1% 2.0% Unemployed, seeking employment 8.6% 7.3% 10.5% 2.5% 8.1% 21.5% 100.0% 5.7% 9.5% 12.1% 9.1% 8.0% 7.7% 4.6% 6.6% 6.8% 11.3% CEF Unemployed, not actively seeking employment 5.4% 6.1% 10.5% 6.5% 3.1% 21.1% 20.0% 100.0% 6.7% 4.2% 5.2% 4.8% 8.0% 9.2% 4.9% 5.1% 4.0% Don't know/unsure % 1.6% 1.7% 2.0% 0.7%

12 Table 5 Page 7 Q6. How satisfied are you with your current position? BASE: TOTAL UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Top Two Box % 50.0% 84.3% 80.0% 87.2% 75.5% 81.6% 73.3% 100.0% 88.2% 67.2% 75.0% 85.5% 83.0% 81.5% 83.3% 91.7% 75.0% 78.6% 75.9% 82.7% 85.7% BCEFGH K 5 - Very Satisfied % 25.0% 31.4% 26.7% 65.4% 37.7% 42.9% 26.7% 100.0% 52.6% 20.9% 40.2% 48.3% 38.3% 44.4% 40.5% 58.3% 50.0% 35.7% 42.6% 55.8% 43.7% CDFGH CDEFGH K U B 4 - Somewhat satisfied % 25.0% 52.9% 53.3% 21.8% 37.7% 38.8% 46.7% 35.5% 46.3% 34.8% 37.2% 44.7% 37.0% 42.9% 33.3% 25.0% 42.9% 33.3% 26.9% 42.1% E E E W 3 - Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 8.0% 25.0% 7.1% 3.8% 13.2% 10.2% 13.3% 5.7% 13.4% 10.9% 6.9% 6.4% 8.3% 4.8% 8.3% 12.5% 12.5% 5.6% 11.5% 5.6% Bottom Two Box % 25.0% 8.6% 20.0% 9.0% 11.3% 8.2% 13.3% 6.2% 19.4% 14.1% 7.6% 10.6% 10.2% 11.9% 12.5% 8.9% 18.5% 5.8% 8.7% J W 2 - Somewhat Dissatisfied % 25.0% 2.9% 6.7% 5.1% 9.4% 2.0% 13.3% 3.3% 9.0% 7.6% 4.1% 6.4% 5.6% 7.1% 12.5% 7.1% 7.4% 1.9% 5.6%

13 Table 5 Page 8 (Continued) Q6. How satisfied are you with your current position? 1 - Very Dissatisfied % 5.7% 13.3% 3.8% 1.9% 6.1% 2.8% 10.4% 6.5% 3.4% 4.3% 4.6% 4.8% 1.8% 11.1% 3.8% 3.2% U Don't know/unsure % 1.2% 0.5% 1.7% 0.4% 0.7% MEAN CDF H K N STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD ERROR MEDIAN

14 Table 6 Page 9 Q7. How related is your current position to the education you received at Ivy Tech? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% 3 - Definitely related % 25.0% 35.2% 20.0% 83.3% 50.9% 55.1% 46.7% 75.0% 62.7% 32.8% 42.4% 62.8% 54.2% 53.9% 50.0% 75.0% 62.5% 48.2% 50.0% 53.8% 59.8% BCDFGH D CD D K N 2 - Somewhat related % 50.0% 36.6% 20.0% 9.0% 18.9% 32.7% 26.7% 25.0% 25.0% 17.9% 33.7% 19.3% 18.8% 23.5% 28.6% 16.7% 25.0% 26.8% 25.9% 25.0% 21.3% EF E OP 1 - Not at all related % 25.0% 28.2% 60.0% 7.7% 30.2% 12.2% 26.7% 12.3% 49.3% 23.9% 17.9% 27.1% 22.6% 21.4% 8.3% 12.5% 25.0% 24.1% 21.2% 18.9% EG CEFG EG J MEAN D BCDFGH D CD D K N STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD ERROR MEDIAN

15 Table 7 Page 10 Q8. Are you actively seeking a different position? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Yes % 75.0% 42.3% 20.0% 19.2% 41.5% 24.5% 26.7% 25.0% 23.1% 49.3% 39.1% 24.8% 35.4% 30.0% 33.3% 41.7% 25.0% 37.5% 37.0% 30.8% 26.0% DEGH EG E J O No % 25.0% 57.7% 80.0% 80.8% 58.5% 75.5% 73.3% 75.0% 76.9% 50.7% 60.9% 75.2% 64.6% 70.0% 66.7% 58.3% 75.0% 62.5% 63.0% 69.2% 74.0% B BCF BC B K N

16 Table 8 Page 11 Q10. What was your status with your current employer either prior to or during enrollment at Ivy Tech? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Not employed with current employer prior to or during 40.6% 100.0% 25.4% 40.0% 56.4% 42.3% 34.7% 20.0% 75.0% 40.6% 36.4% 44.6% 42.4% 31.2% 40.7% 38.1% 41.7% 50.0% 41.1% 42.6% 46.2% 37.3% enrollment at Ivy Tech CDEFGH CGH C CH Full-time employee 35 or more hours per week 35.8% 46.5% 33.3% 15.4% 38.5% 51.0% 53.3% 45.8% 7.6% 17.4% 43.8% 45.8% 33.3% 54.8% 41.7% 12.5% 17.9% 22.2% 32.7% 50.8% E E E E K N N QT UVW Part-time employee % 23.9% 20.0% 23.1% 13.5% 4.1% 20.0% 8.5% 47.0% 29.3% 9.0% 16.7% 19.9% 4.8% 16.7% 12.5% 33.9% 31.5% 5.8% 8.7% G G J O R WX WX Intern % 2.8% 5.1% 5.8% 8.2% 25.0% 4.2% 7.6% 7.6% 3.5% 4.2% 5.1% 2.4% 12.5% 5.4% 3.7% 11.5% 2.4% X Employed % 6.7% 0.5% 0.7% 0.5% 1.9% Work study % 6.7% 1.5% 2.1% 12.5% 1.8% Temporary employee % 1.4% 1.1% 0.5% 1.9%

17 Table 8 Page 12 (Continued) Q10. What was your status with your current employer either prior to or during enrollment at Ivy Tech? Self-employed % 2.0% 0.5% 0.7% 0.8% Don't know/unsure % 1.6% 1.5% 0.6% 0.4% 0.7%

18 Table 9 Page 13 Q11. After graduation, did your job require you to move...? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Out of state % 2.8% 6.7% 1.9% 1.4% 1.5% 1.1% 2.1% 0.9% 2.4% 12.5% 1.9% 1.9% 1.6% More than 50 miles from previous residence but 2.8% 2.8% 3.8% 8.2% 2.8% 3.0% 2.2% 2.8% 4.2% 1.4% 7.1% 8.3% 12.5% 7.1% 5.8% 0.8% still in state Neither % 100.0% 94.4% 93.3% 100.0% 94.3% 91.8% 100.0% 100.0% 95.8% 95.5% 96.7% 95.2% 95.8% 97.7% 90.5% 91.7% 75.0% 92.9% 98.1% 92.3% 97.6% CG CG CG CG

19 Table 10 Page 14 Q12. How much, if any, FULL-TIME work experience of ANY TYPE (excluding internships) did you have prior to graduating from Ivy Tech? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% None % 50.0% 14.6% 16.7% 15.0% 14.3% 10.8% 26.3% 11.8% 23.9% 7.1% 33.3% 23.8% 9.6% 11.9% 13.1% 15.7% 23.1% 25.0% 76.9% JL L OP Less than 1 year % 25.0% 7.3% 6.2% 3.2% 20.0% 2.8% 10.4% 3.6% 7.6% 3.0% 3.4% 3.6% 3.9% 23.1% 23.1% 1-3 years % 25.0% 20.7% 22.2% 15.0% 20.6% 13.8% 21.1% 20.0% 17.5% 22.4% 14.3% 16.7% 37.1% 12.0% 3.4% 21.5% 9.8% 7.7% 12.5% 100% OP P R 4-6 years % 18.3% 16.7% 15.0% 19.0% 23.1% 5.3% 20.0% 17.9% 16.4% 14.3% 16.7% 23.8% 16.8% 6.8% 16.7% 17.6% 15.4% 37.5% 100% H P P 7-9 years % 7.3% 22.2% 8.8% 6.3% 10.8% 21.1% 20.0% 10.8% 17.9% 16.7% 4.8% 15.6% 3.4% 10.8% 11.8% 21.9% NP 10 years or more % 31.7% 22.2% 40.0% 36.5% 41.5% 26.3% 20.0% 39.2% 26.9% 42.9% 16.7% 2.9% 43.1% 71.2% 34.3% 41.2% 30.8% 25.0% 78.1% M M N NO

20 Table 10 Page 15 (Continued) Q12. How much, if any, FULL-TIME work experience of ANY TYPE (excluding internships) did you have prior to graduating from Ivy Tech? Don't know/unsure % 5.3% 3.4% 0.6% 0.4%

21 Table 11 Page 16 Q13. How much, if any, FULL-TIME work experience IN THE FIELD OF YOUR CURRENT JOB did you have prior to graduating from Ivy Tech? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% None % 50.0% 24.2% 23.1% 62.1% 29.8% 26.2% 27.3% 50.0% 29.4% 56.9% 42.5% 32.8% 39.0% 37.0% 27.8% 33.3% 66.7% 50.0% 37.0% 32.7% 36.2% CDFGH J Less than 1 year % 50.0% 19.4% 7.7% 15.2% 8.5% 25.0% 11.2% 15.7% 17.8% 10.7% 4.9% 10.1% 11.1% 55.6% 50.0% 13.0% 15.4% 5.5% P QR VWX 1-3 years % 22.6% 7.7% 10.6% 21.3% 19.0% 9.1% 17.6% 13.7% 23.3% 14.5% 12.2% 18.5% 16.7% 35.2% 19.2% 9.4% X 4-6 years % 16.1% 7.7% 3.0% 12.8% 23.8% 18.2% 25.0% 16.0% 2.0% 12.3% 14.5% 7.3% 14.3% 11.1% 7.4% 25.0% 11.8% E E K VX 7-9 years % 3.2% 30.8% 1.5% 4.3% 11.9% 18.2% 7.5% 2.0% 2.7% 9.9% 2.4% 5.8% 11.1% 11.1% 1.9% 5.8% 9.4% CEF E K NP V 10 years or more % 14.5% 23.1% 7.6% 23.4% 19.0% 27.3% 18.2% 9.8% 1.4% 17.6% 34.1% 14.3% 22.2% 33.3% 5.6% 1.9% 27.6% E N NO VW

22 Table 12 Page 17 Q14. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE TO ENTER OR RE-ENTER THE JOB MARKET? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Top Two Box % 100.0% 86.2% 76.9% 95.9% 94.2% 88.7% 88.2% 100.0% 95.4% 86.7% 73.9% 85.7% 95.5% 92.3% 76.6% 92.5% 81.0% 90.9% 100% 89.5% 96.2% 91.7% 88.6% CDG C CDG L P P QR X 4 - Very Helpful % 100.0% 33.8% 7.7% 75.3% 57.7% 52.8% 58.8% 80.0% 62.1% 48.3% 26.1% 42.9% 53.9% 54.2% 55.3% 54.7% 57.1% 45.5% 50.0% 50.9% 50.9% 64.6% 53.7% CDEFGH D CDFG CD CD D CD L L 3 - Somewhat Helpful % 52.3% 69.2% 20.5% 36.5% 35.8% 29.4% 20.0% 33.3% 38.3% 47.8% 42.9% 41.6% 38.0% 21.3% 37.7% 23.8% 45.5% 50.0% 38.6% 45.3% 27.1% 35.0% E EFGHI P P Bottom Two Box % 13.8% 23.1% 4.1% 5.8% 11.3% 11.8% 4.6% 13.3% 26.1% 14.3% 4.5% 7.7% 23.4% 7.5% 19.0% 9.1% 10.5% 3.8% 8.3% 11.4% E J NO V 2 - Not Very Helpful % 9.2% 7.7% 1.4% 3.8% 5.7% 2.3% 5.0% 17.4% 7.1% 3.4% 2.8% 12.8% 4.2% 7.1% 5.3% 1.9% 8.3% 4.1% E O 1 - Not At All Helpful % 4.6% 15.4% 2.7% 1.9% 5.7% 11.8% 2.3% 8.3% 8.7% 7.1% 1.1% 4.9% 10.6% 3.3% 11.9% 9.1% 5.3% 1.9% 7.3% N

23 Table 12 Page 18 (Continued) Q14. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE TO ENTER OR RE-ENTER THE JOB MARKET? Not applicable % 25.0% 20.7% 31.6% 8.8% 17.5% 16.9% 10.5% 17.9% 10.4% 17.2% 22.2% 15.2% 15.5% 18.6% 15.5% 17.6% 15.4% 25.0% 12.3% 13.1% 18.6% 17.9% E E Don't know % 1.5% 3.4% 1.7% 0.4% 0.7% MEAN D CDG CD D D KL STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD ERROR MEDIAN

24 Table 13 Page 19 Q15. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you IMPROVE SKILLS FOR YOUR CURRENT JOB? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Top Two Box % 100.0% 85.3% 84.6% 88.6% 89.6% 87.7% 76.5% 100.0% 89.5% 80.0% 78.9% 100.0% 92.0% 88.5% 74.5% 86.2% 87.0% 100.0% 100% 88.1% 92.0% 89.6% 83.5% CEFGH CEFGH JKL P P QR QR 4 - Very Helpful % 100.0% 36.8% 15.4% 77.1% 43.8% 52.6% 47.1% 50.0% 56.0% 42.0% 31.6% 55.6% 54.5% 51.1% 51.1% 50.2% 56.5% 63.6% 57.1% 50.8% 54.0% 54.2% 50.4% CDEFGH CDFGH D D D L 3 - Somewhat Helpful % 48.5% 69.2% 11.4% 45.8% 35.1% 29.4% 50.0% 33.5% 38.0% 47.4% 44.4% 37.5% 37.4% 23.4% 36.0% 30.4% 36.4% 42.9% 37.3% 38.0% 35.4% 33.1% E EGH E E Bottom Two Box % 14.7% 15.4% 11.4% 10.4% 12.3% 23.5% 10.5% 20.0% 21.1% 8.0% 11.5% 25.5% 13.8% 13.0% 11.9% 8.0% 10.4% 16.5% NO 2 - Not Very Helpful % 8.8% 7.7% 4.3% 2.1% 5.3% 5.9% 4.7% 6.0% 10.5% 3.4% 7.2% 4.3% 6.4% 4.3% 5.1% 2.0% 6.2% 6.6% 1 - Not At All Helpful % 5.9% 7.7% 7.1% 8.3% 7.0% 17.6% 5.8% 14.0% 10.5% 4.5% 4.3% 21.3% 7.4% 8.7% 6.8% 6.0% 4.2% 9.9% NO

25 Table 13 Page 20 (Continued) Q15. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you IMPROVE SKILLS FOR YOUR CURRENT JOB? Not applicable % 25.0% 15.9% 26.3% 12.5% 19.0% 9.2% 5.3% 60.0% 9.0% 22.4% 20.7% 50.0% 14.3% 14.3% 18.6% 17.1% 9.8% 12.5% 9.2% 16.4% 16.9% 15.9% CEGH J JKL Don't know % 1.2% 1.6% 0.5% 1.5% 1.2% 0.4% 7.7% 1.7% 0.7% Refused % 1.6% 3.4% 1.0% 0.4% 0.7% No Response % 5.3% 1.6% 3.1% 5.3% 0.5% 1.5% 10.3% 1.0% 1.8% 1.7% 1.6% 7.7% 1.6% 2.6% MEAN D CDFH KL P P STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD ERROR MEDIAN

26 Table 14 Page 21 Q16. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE FOR A SALARY INCREASE AT YOUR CURRENT EMPLOYER? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Top Two Box % 100.0% 58.9% 60.0% 80.0% 57.1% 77.8% 60.0% 100.0% 70.2% 58.3% 64.7% 83.3% 66.7% 73.0% 59.5% 67.9% 71.1% 66.7% 75.0% 70.5% 65.9% 73.0% 66.7% CDEFGH CF CF CDEFGH 4 - Very Helpful % 50.0% 25.0% 55.6% 28.6% 46.3% 33.3% 41.1% 27.8% 29.4% 33.3% 36.4% 38.7% 32.4% 35.3% 42.1% 25.0% 50.0% 45.5% 34.1% 32.4% 35.4% CF C 3 - Somewhat Helpful % 50.0% 33.9% 60.0% 24.4% 28.6% 31.5% 26.7% 100.0% 29.1% 30.6% 35.3% 50.0% 30.3% 34.2% 27.0% 32.7% 28.9% 41.7% 25.0% 25.0% 31.7% 40.5% 31.2% E CDEFGH Bottom Two Box % 41.1% 40.0% 20.0% 42.9% 22.2% 40.0% 29.8% 41.7% 35.3% 16.7% 33.3% 27.0% 40.5% 32.1% 28.9% 33.3% 25.0% 29.5% 34.1% 27.0% 33.3% EG EG 2 - Not Very Helpful % 19.6% 10.0% 6.7% 22.9% 5.6% 13.3% 13.9% 8.3% 23.5% 15.2% 14.4% 5.4% 12.8% 10.5% 33.3% 13.6% 12.2% 10.8% 13.5% EG EG 1 - Not At All Helpful % 21.4% 30.0% 13.3% 20.0% 16.7% 26.7% 15.9% 33.3% 11.8% 16.7% 18.2% 12.6% 35.1% 19.2% 18.4% 25.0% 15.9% 22.0% 16.2% 19.8% J O

27 Table 14 Page 22 (Continued) Q16. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE FOR A SALARY INCREASE AT YOUR CURRENT EMPLOYER? Not applicable % 50.0% 31.7% 47.4% 42.5% 42.9% 16.9% 21.1% 80.0% 28.3% 46.3% 37.9% 66.7% 36.2% 33.3% 37.3% 37.3% 25.5% 7.7% 50.0% 32.3% 32.8% 37.3% 35.1% G G GH G CEFGH J JL S S Don't know % 1.2% 0.5% 0.6% 0.4% 0.7% No Response % 1.6% 3.4% 1.0% 0.4% 0.7% MEAN CDF CD K P STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD ERROR MEDIAN

28 Table 15 Page 23 Q17. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE FOR A PROMOTION OPPORTUNITY AT YOUR CURRENT EMPLOYER? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Top Two Box % 100.0% 68.5% 50.0% 69.0% 69.7% 70.8% 69.2% 100.0% 73.8% 57.1% 38.5% 83.3% 68.1% 73.2% 58.8% 69.6% 70.6% 54.5% 66.7% 72.5% 69.8% 69.4% 66.7% CDEFGH CDEFGH L L 4 - Very Helpful % 27.8% 38.1% 39.4% 41.7% 38.5% 37.6% 22.9% 23.1% 50.0% 31.9% 35.1% 35.3% 31.1% 50.0% 18.2% 33.3% 40.0% 32.6% 36.1% 31.0% QS 3 - Somewhat Helpful % 100.0% 40.7% 50.0% 31.0% 30.3% 29.2% 30.8% 100.0% 36.2% 34.3% 15.4% 33.3% 36.2% 38.1% 23.5% 38.5% 20.6% 36.4% 33.3% 32.5% 37.2% 33.3% 35.7% CDEFGH CDEFGH R Bottom Two Box % 31.5% 50.0% 31.0% 30.3% 29.2% 30.8% 26.2% 42.9% 61.5% 16.7% 31.9% 26.8% 41.2% 30.4% 29.4% 45.5% 33.3% 27.5% 30.2% 30.6% 33.3% JM 2 - Not Very Helpful % 14.8% 20.0% 11.9% 15.2% 14.6% 7.7% 14.2% 8.6% 38.5% 15.9% 13.4% 11.8% 13.5% 8.8% 45.5% 12.5% 11.6% 16.7% 14.3% K QR 1 - Not At All Helpful % 16.7% 30.0% 19.0% 15.2% 14.6% 23.1% 12.1% 34.3% 23.1% 16.7% 15.9% 13.4% 29.4% 16.9% 20.6% 33.3% 15.0% 18.6% 13.9% 19.0% J

29 Table 15 Page 24 (Continued) Q17. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE FOR A PROMOTION OPPORTUNITY AT YOUR CURRENT EMPLOYER? Not applicable % 50.0% 34.1% 47.4% 46.2% 46.0% 24.6% 31.6% 80.0% 32.5% 47.8% 51.7% 66.7% 33.3% 41.1% 42.4% 40.1% 33.3% 15.4% 62.5% 36.9% 29.5% 39.0% 43.0% G G CGH J J S S Don't know % 1.2% 1.5% 0.9% 1.2% 0.8% 1.5% 0.7% No Response % 1.6% 3.4% 1.0% 0.4% 0.7% MEAN D KL STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD ERROR MEDIAN

30 Table 16 Page 25 Q18. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE FOR A NEW POSITION WITH A DIFFERENT EMPLOYER IN THE SAME FIELD? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Top Two Box % 100.0% 72.7% 60.0% 84.6% 80.0% 87.0% 68.8% 100.0% 84.4% 67.4% 66.7% 87.5% 82.2% 79.8% 72.2% 78.5% 77.1% 100.0% 66.7% 83.7% 80.0% 78.9% 77.1% CDEFGH CDEFGH K QR 4 - Very Helpful % 100.0% 38.2% 10.0% 67.3% 54.3% 45.7% 31.2% 100.0% 53.9% 37.2% 33.3% 50.0% 46.6% 50.0% 47.2% 46.8% 48.6% 58.3% 66.7% 51.2% 40.0% 60.5% 45.8% CDEFGH D CDGH D D CDEFGH K 3 - Somewhat Helpful % 34.5% 50.0% 17.3% 25.7% 41.3% 37.5% 30.5% 30.2% 33.3% 37.5% 35.6% 29.8% 25.0% 31.6% 28.6% 41.7% 32.6% 40.0% 18.4% 31.2% E E E W Bottom Two Box % 27.3% 40.0% 15.4% 20.0% 13.0% 31.2% 15.6% 32.6% 33.3% 12.5% 17.8% 20.2% 27.8% 21.5% 22.9% 33.3% 16.3% 20.0% 21.1% 22.9% J 2 - Not Very Helpful % 12.7% 10.0% 3.8% 5.7% 4.3% 6.2% 5.7% 4.7% 26.7% 5.5% 7.7% 8.3% 7.0% 11.4% 4.7% 5.0% 7.9% 8.3% 1 - Not At All Helpful % 14.5% 30.0% 11.5% 14.3% 8.7% 25.0% 9.9% 27.9% 6.7% 12.5% 12.3% 12.5% 19.4% 14.6% 11.4% 33.3% 11.6% 15.0% 13.2% 14.6% JL

31 Table 16 Page 26 (Continued) Q18. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE FOR A NEW POSITION WITH A DIFFERENT EMPLOYER IN THE SAME FIELD? Not applicable % 50.0% 32.9% 47.4% 32.5% 42.9% 27.7% 15.8% 80.0% 32.1% 35.8% 44.8% 55.6% 29.5% 36.3% 39.0% 36.1% 29.4% 7.7% 62.5% 30.8% 34.4% 35.6% 35.1% H H CEFGH S S S Don't know % 2.5% 1.5% 1.4% 1.8% 0.8% 2.0% 3.1% 0.7% No Response % 1.6% 3.4% 1.0% 0.4% 0.7% MEAN CDH D D K STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD ERROR MEDIAN

32 Table 17 Page 27 Q19. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE TO CHANGE CAREERS? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Top Two Box % 100.0% 79.1% 81.8% 92.9% 80.0% 80.5% 82.4% 100.0% 84.8% 87.7% 73.7% 63.6% 84.1% 84.3% 83.7% 82.8% 84.2% 91.7% 100% 86.5% 79.5% 88.9% 82.5% CEFG CF CEFG QR 4 - Very Helpful % 100.0% 41.8% 18.2% 78.6% 56.0% 36.6% 52.9% 100.0% 56.7% 61.4% 21.1% 45.5% 53.7% 56.7% 53.1% 54.0% 55.3% 58.3% 50.0% 51.9% 50.0% 57.8% 55.8% CDEFGH CDFGH D D CDEFGH L L 3 - Somewhat Helpful % 37.3% 63.6% 14.3% 24.0% 43.9% 29.4% 28.0% 26.3% 52.6% 18.2% 30.5% 27.6% 30.6% 28.8% 28.9% 33.3% 50.0% 34.6% 29.5% 31.1% 26.7% E EF EF JKM Bottom Two Box % 20.9% 18.2% 7.1% 20.0% 19.5% 17.6% 15.2% 12.3% 26.3% 36.4% 15.9% 15.7% 16.3% 17.2% 15.8% 8.3% 13.5% 20.5% 11.1% 17.5% E E 2 - Not Very Helpful % 10.4% 9.1% 1.4% 10.0% 9.8% 5.9% 6.7% 3.5% 15.8% 27.3% 6.1% 8.7% 6.1% 7.1% 10.5% 8.3% 5.8% 6.8% 6.7% 8.3% E 1 - Not At All Helpful % 10.4% 9.1% 5.7% 10.0% 9.8% 11.8% 8.5% 8.8% 10.5% 9.1% 9.8% 7.1% 10.2% 10.1% 5.3% 7.7% 13.6% 4.4% 9.2%

33 Table 17 Page 28 (Continued) Q19. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you PREPARE TO CHANGE CAREERS? Not applicable % 75.0% 18.3% 36.8% 10.0% 20.6% 36.9% 10.5% 20.0% 21.7% 14.9% 34.5% 33.3% 21.0% 23.2% 16.9% 21.0% 23.5% 7.7% 25.0% 18.5% 26.2% 22.0% 20.5% CEFH EH CEFH K No Response % 5.3% 2.5% 0.9% 5.6% 1.0% 1.2% 0.4% 2.0% 1.5% 1.6% 1.7% MEAN CDFG D L L STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD ERROR MEDIAN

34 Table 18 Page 29 Q20. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you FULFILL AN EMPLOYER REQUIREMENT? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Top Two Box % 100.0% 67.4% 83.7% 67.9% 80.4% 93.3% 100.0% 78.4% 70.4% 75.0% 100.0% 75.4% 79.6% 68.2% 75.9% 80.6% 77.8% 75.0% 80.6% 76.3% 77.1% 74.7% CEFG CF CEFG JKL 4 - Very Helpful % 100.0% 34.8% 74.4% 35.7% 64.7% 53.3% 100.0% 57.5% 40.7% 50.0% 80.0% 52.3% 58.2% 45.5% 57.1% 50.0% 44.4% 50.0% 58.3% 50.0% 57.1% 53.2% CEFGH CF CF CEFGH 3 - Somewhat Helpful % 32.6% 9.3% 32.1% 15.7% 40.0% 20.9% 29.6% 25.0% 20.0% 23.1% 21.4% 22.7% 18.8% 30.6% 33.3% 25.0% 22.2% 26.3% 20.0% 21.5% EG E E Bottom Two Box % 32.6% 100.0% 16.3% 32.1% 19.6% 6.7% 21.6% 29.6% 25.0% 24.6% 20.4% 31.8% 24.1% 19.4% 22.2% 25.0% 19.4% 23.7% 22.9% 25.3% H CEFGH H 2 - Not Very Helpful % 15.2% 50.0% 4.7% 14.3% 7.8% 6.7% 10.4% 3.7% 18.8% 12.3% 9.2% 9.1% 9.8% 8.3% 22.2% 11.1% 10.5% 8.6% 10.1% 1 - Not At All Helpful % 17.4% 50.0% 11.6% 17.9% 11.8% 11.2% 25.9% 6.2% 12.3% 11.2% 22.7% 14.3% 11.1% 25.0% 8.3% 13.2% 14.3% 15.2% Not applicable % 25.0% 43.9% 73.7% 46.2% 54.0% 20.0% 21.1% 80.0% 36.3% 58.2% 37.9% 66.7% 35.2% 40.5% 61.0% 46.0% 27.5% 30.8% 50.0% 41.5% 36.1% 39.0% 46.4% GH BCEGH GH GH GH J JL NO R

35 Table 18 Page 30 (Continued) Q20. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you FULFILL AN EMPLOYER REQUIREMENT? No Response % 25.0% 15.8% 1.6% 1.5% 0.5% 1.5% 6.9% 5.6% 2.9% 1.2% 1.7% 1.2% 2.0% 3.1% 1.6% 1.7% 1.3% MEAN D CDF CD CD STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD ERROR MEDIAN

36 Table 19 Page 31 Q21. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you FULFILL A PERSONAL INTEREST OR SELF-IMPROVEMENT GOAL? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Top Two Box % 100.0% 96.0% 89.5% 97.4% 98.4% 91.8% 94.4% 100.0% 97.0% 98.4% 84.6% 88.2% 95.0% 96.2% 94.5% 95.4% 95.9% 100.0% 87.5% 96.8% 96.7% 96.3% 94.3% G G Q 4 - Very Helpful % 100.0% 69.3% 63.2% 84.2% 86.9% 65.6% 55.6% 80.0% 77.6% 78.1% 53.8% 70.6% 65.3% 78.0% 81.8% 74.3% 75.5% 61.5% 75.0% 69.4% 73.8% 81.5% 75.2% CDEFGH CGH CDGH L L N N 3 - Somewhat Helpful % 26.7% 26.3% 13.2% 11.5% 26.2% 38.9% 20.0% 19.4% 20.3% 30.8% 17.6% 29.7% 18.2% 12.7% 21.1% 20.4% 38.5% 12.5% 27.4% 23.0% 14.8% 19.1% EF F EF OP Bottom Two Box % 4.0% 10.5% 2.6% 1.6% 8.2% 5.6% 3.0% 1.6% 15.4% 11.8% 5.0% 3.8% 5.5% 4.6% 4.1% 12.5% 3.2% 3.3% 3.7% 5.7% 2 - Not Very Helpful % 1.3% 5.3% 1.3% 1.6% 3.3% 5.6% 1.5% 15.4% 2.0% 2.5% 1.8% 1.7% 4.1% 12.5% 3.7% 3.5% 1 - Not At All Helpful % 2.7% 5.3% 1.3% 4.9% 1.5% 1.6% 11.8% 3.0% 1.3% 3.6% 3.0% 3.2% 3.3% 2.1% Not applicable % 8.5% 5.0% 3.2% 6.2% 5.3% 5.2% 4.5% 10.3% 5.6% 3.8% 5.4% 6.8% 6.0% 3.9% 4.6% 8.5% 6.6%

37 Table 19 Page 32 (Continued) Q21. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you FULFILL A PERSONAL INTEREST OR SELF-IMPROVEMENT GOAL? MEAN DGH CDGH L L N STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD ERROR MEDIAN

38 Table 20 Page 33 Q22. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you EARN CREDITS TO TRANSFER TO ANOTHER COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY? BASE: THOSE UNWEIGHTED % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100.0% Top Two Box % 100.0% 98.6% 88.9% 93.9% 93.3% 78.6% 100.0% 100.0% 93.6% 98.0% 80.0% 87.5% 96.3% 90.2% 95.3% 92.2% 93.3% 100.0% 100% 91.8% 93.5% 97.6% 91.1% G G G G G G Q Q 4 - Very Helpful % 100.0% 85.5% 72.2% 71.4% 71.1% 50.0% 84.2% 75.0% 73.2% 81.6% 45.0% 81.2% 79.0% 71.3% 67.4% 69.4% 86.7% 72.7% 66.7% 71.4% 78.3% 78.0% 69.6% CDEFG G G G G L L L Q 3 - Somewhat Helpful % 13.0% 16.7% 22.4% 22.2% 28.6% 15.8% 25.0% 20.4% 16.3% 35.0% 6.2% 17.3% 18.9% 27.9% 22.8% 6.7% 27.3% 33.3% 20.4% 15.2% 19.5% 21.4% M M R Bottom Two Box % 1.4% 11.1% 6.1% 6.7% 21.4% 6.4% 2.0% 20.0% 12.5% 3.7% 9.8% 4.7% 7.8% 6.7% 8.2% 6.5% 2.4% 8.9% CEF 2 - Not Very Helpful % 1.4% 5.6% 2.0% 4.4% 9.5% 3.2% 15.0% 6.2% 3.7% 4.9% 3.3% 6.7% 4.1% 6.5% 2.4% 2.7% 1 - Not At All Helpful % 5.6% 4.1% 2.2% 11.9% 3.2% 2.0% 5.0% 6.2% 4.9% 4.7% 4.4% 4.1% 6.2% Not applicable % 25.0% 15.9% 5.3% 37.5% 27.0% 35.4% 20.0% 25.9% 25.4% 27.6% 11.1% 21.9% 26.8% 27.1% 27.8% 11.8% 15.4% 25.0% 24.6% 24.6% 30.5% 24.5% CD D CD R

39 Table 20 Page 34 (Continued) Q22. How beneficial was your coursework at Ivy Tech in helping you EARN CREDITS TO TRANSFER TO ANOTHER COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY? Don't know % 1.2% 1.5% 0.6% 0.4% 0.7% No Response % 1.6% 3.4% 1.0% 0.4% 0.7% MEAN DEFG G G G L L STANDARD DEVIATION STANDARD ERROR MEDIAN

BC Tech Co- op Grants Program Guidelines

BC Tech Co- op Grants Program Guidelines BC Tech Co- op Grants Program Guidelines BC Tech Co- op Grants Program The BC Innovation Council (BCIC) is pleased to offer the BC Tech Co- op Grants Program, a two- year collaborative initiative to support

More information

NSSE 2017 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons NSSEville State University NSSEID:

NSSE 2017 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons NSSEville State University NSSEID: NSSE Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons University NSSEID: 888888 NSSE Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons About This Report The Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons report presents item-by-item

More information

NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons NSSEville State University NSSEID:

NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons NSSEville State University NSSEID: NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons NSSEID: 888888 About This Report The Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons report presents item-by-item student responses and statistical comparisons

More information

NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons California State University San Marcos IPEDS:

NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons California State University San Marcos IPEDS: NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons IPEDS: 366711 About This Report The Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons report presents item-by-item student responses and statistical comparisons

More information

CRACIUN RESEARCH. June 20, 2011 A M A R K E T R E S E A R C H S T CHA

CRACIUN RESEARCH. June 20, 2011 A M A R K E T R E S E A R C H S T CHA CRACIUN RESEARCH A M A R K E T R E S E A R C H S T U D Y CHA June 20, 2011 Craciun Research Anchorage. Seattle. Washington, DC 907.279.3982 www.craciunresearch.com 2011 Craciun Research. All rights reserved.

More information

APPENDIX B: DATA TABLES

APPENDIX B: DATA TABLES APPENDIX B: DATA TABLES PHILOSOPHY STUDENT SURVEY TABLES Q1. Were or are you... Valid Majoring in Philosophy 18 45.0 45.0 45.0 Minoring in Philosophy 22 55.0 55.0 100.0 100.0 Q2. Did you have a particular

More information

NSSE Senior Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Illinois State University

NSSE Senior Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Illinois State University - Senior Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen,

More information

Rider Satisfaction Survey Total Market 2006

Rider Satisfaction Survey Total Market 2006 Rider Satisfaction Survey Total Market 2006 Prepared For: Valley Metro Fall 2006 2702 North 44 th Street Suite 100-A. Phoenix, Arizona 85008 602-707-0050 www.westgroupresearch.com Valley Metro 2006 Rider

More information

NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons University of South Carolina Aiken

NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons University of South Carolina Aiken NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Office of Institutional iveness, Research & Compliance Director: Lloyd A. Dawe, Ph.D. IPEDS: 218645 About This Report The Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons

More information

NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Regent University

NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Regent University Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some cells appear

More information

NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons

NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some

More information

NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons University of New Hampshire

NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons University of New Hampshire NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some

More information

NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons California State University Chico

NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons California State University Chico NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some

More information

Cabrillo College Transportation Study

Cabrillo College Transportation Study Cabrillo College Transportation Study Planning and Research Office Terrence Willett, Research Analyst, Principle Author Jing Luan, Director of Planning and Research Judy Cassada, Research Specialist Shirley

More information

NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons

NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some

More information

NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley

NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some

More information

NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Emporia State University

NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Emporia State University NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some

More information

NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Emporia State University

NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Emporia State University NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some

More information

NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons

NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some

More information

NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons New Mexico State University

NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons New Mexico State University NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some

More information

NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons West Texas A&M University

NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons West Texas A&M University NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some

More information

NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons University of Wisconsin-Whitewater NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some

More information

NSSE 2018 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons

NSSE 2018 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons NSSE 2018 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some

More information

NSSE 2018 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons

NSSE 2018 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons NSSE 2018 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some

More information

NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Eastern Kentucky University

NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Eastern Kentucky University NSSE 2016 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some

More information

Confidence Interval Notes Calculating Confidence Intervals

Confidence Interval Notes Calculating Confidence Intervals Confidence Interval Notes Calculating Confidence Intervals Calculating One-Population Mean Confidence Intervals for Quantitative Data It is always best to use a computer program to make these calculations,

More information

BCLC Employee Survey Final Report. August 31, 2016

BCLC Employee Survey Final Report. August 31, 2016 BCLC Employee Survey Final Report August 31, 2016 BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY Survey Background Canadian research indicates that gaming workers exhibit rates of problem gambling that are over three times

More information

AAMPO Regional Transportation Attitude Survey

AAMPO Regional Transportation Attitude Survey AAMPO Regional Transportation Attitude Survey Traditionally Underserved Populations helping organizations make better decisions since 1982 2018 Submitted to the AAMPO By: ETC Institute 725 W. Frontier

More information

Baruch College. Federal Work-Study Supervisor Orientation

Baruch College. Federal Work-Study Supervisor Orientation Baruch College Federal Work-Study Supervisor Orientation Program Overview Topics How to Hire Work-Study Students Policies & Procedures FWS Supervisor Responsibilities Program Overview What is Federal Work-Study?

More information

Conseil de développement économique des Territoires du Nord-Ouest Quebec Travel conversion study 2008 Report May 26, 2009

Conseil de développement économique des Territoires du Nord-Ouest Quebec Travel conversion study 2008 Report May 26, 2009 Conseil de développement économique des Territoires du Nord-Ouest Quebec Travel conversion study 2008 Report May 26, 2009 226-388 donald street winnipeg manitoba canada R3B 2J4 204.989.8002 fax 204.989.8048

More information

America s Brightest ORANGE

America s Brightest ORANGE America s Brightest ORANGE Oklahoma State University 2013 Survey of Alumni of Graduate Programs Jeremy Penn, Ph.D. Director Mark Nicholas, Ph.D. Assistant Director John Hathcoat, Ph.D. Statistical Analyst

More information

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Phone 845.575.5050 Fax 845.575.5111 www.maristpoll.marist.edu Majority Thinks Colleges Break NCAA Rules Most Say Only Scholarships for

More information

2014 Ontario Works Transit Survey: Final Results

2014 Ontario Works Transit Survey: Final Results 2014 Ontario Works Transit Survey: Final Results Irena Pozgaj-Jones, Project Manager, Transportation September 2014 Overview Background Survey Purpose and Objectives Methodology Respondent Demographics

More information

Rider Satisfaction Survey Phoenix Riders 2004

Rider Satisfaction Survey Phoenix Riders 2004 Rider Satisfaction Survey Riders Prepared For: Valley Metro Spring 2720 E. Thomas Rd. Bldg. A, Arizona 85016-8296 602-707-0050 answers@westgroupresearch.com Valley Metro Rider Satisfaction Survey - Page

More information

Regional Dial-a-Ride Passenger Survey Report

Regional Dial-a-Ride Passenger Survey Report Regional Dial-a-Ride Passenger Survey Report December 2011 Prepared for: Dial-a-Ride Study December 2011 Page i Table of Contents Section: Page #: Executive Summary... ii I. Introduction...1 A. Background

More information

SALARY SURVEY OF SCRUM PROFESSIONALS sponsored by scrum alliance

SALARY SURVEY OF SCRUM PROFESSIONALS sponsored by scrum alliance SALARY SURVEY OF SCRUM PROFESSIONALS 2017-2018 sponsored by TABLE OF CONTENTS 03 WELCOME FROM BENNIE COVINGTON 04 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 06 ENTRY TO SCRUM 07 EDUCATION 08 GROWTH OF SCRUM PRACTICE 09 EXPERIENCED

More information

GAMBLING BEHAVIORS AND PERCEPTIONS OF THE EFFECTS OF GAMBLING IN THE LEHIGH VALLEY 2009 SURVEY OF RESIDENTS. February 2010

GAMBLING BEHAVIORS AND PERCEPTIONS OF THE EFFECTS OF GAMBLING IN THE LEHIGH VALLEY 2009 SURVEY OF RESIDENTS. February 2010 GAMBLING BEHAVIORS AND PERCEPTIONS OF THE EFFECTS OF GAMBLING IN THE LEHIGH VALLEY 2009 SURVEY OF RESIDENTS February 2010 Prepared by Michele Moser Deegan, Ph.D. Director Lehigh Valley Research Consortium

More information

THE AP-GfK POLL March, 2016

THE AP-GfK POLL March, 2016 Public Affairs & Corporate Communications THE AP-GfK POLL March, 2016 Conducted by GfK Public Affairs & Corporate Communications A survey of the American general population (ages 18+) Interview dates:

More information

Percentage of Respondents Strongly Agree/Agree

Percentage of Respondents Strongly Agree/Agree Fitchburg State University Campus Climate Survey 218 Department of Humanities University Students: White n=148, Non-White n=36 Interdisciplinary Studies Students: White n=8, Non-White n=1 Part I: Welcoming

More information

Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results Table of Contents Public Surveys for Deer Goal Setting... 1 Methods... 1 Hunter Survey... 2 Demographics... 2 Population

More information

LAPEER MICHIGAN WITHHOLDING TAX GUIDE

LAPEER MICHIGAN WITHHOLDING TAX GUIDE CITY OF LAPEER INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT 576 LIBERTY PARK LAPEER MI 48446 LAPEER MICHIGAN WITHHOLDING TAX GUIDE WHO MUST WITHHOLD Every employer who: has a location in the city; is doing business in the city

More information

Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission Transportation Survey

Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission Transportation Survey Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission Transportation Survey Report of Results November 8, 2012 Submitted by Resource Systems Group 180 Battery Street, Suite 350 Burlington, Vermont 05401 TEL 802.

More information

Customer Acquisition Pay-Plan

Customer Acquisition Pay-Plan Customer Acquisition Pay-Plan A New YOU Starts TODAY... With Anovité Our Compensation Plan The Anovite compensation plan was designed to provide you with multiple streams of income. With the Anovite opportunity,

More information

Our Compensation Plan

Our Compensation Plan A NEW YOU! Our Compensation Plan The Anovite compensation plan was designed to provide you with multiple streams of income. With the Anovite opportunity, you get to choose how big your business will become.

More information

Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results Table of Contents Public Surveys for Deer Goal Setting... 1 Methods... 1 Hunter Survey... 2 Demographics... 2 Population

More information

Oregon State Lottery Behavior & Attitude Tracking Study

Oregon State Lottery Behavior & Attitude Tracking Study Oregon State Lottery Behavior & Attitude Tracking Study Presentation of Findings November 2012 Wave Prepared by: Topics Covered Brief Overview of Objectives and Methodology Key Trends Related to: Attitudes

More information

NFL1. Do you think television shows, in general, are getting better or getting worse?

NFL1. Do you think television shows, in general, are getting better or getting worse? 1350 Willow Rd, Suite 102 Menlo Park, CA 94025 www.knowledgenetworks.com Interview dates: January 21 January 26, 2011 Total Interviews: 1,125 adults NFL Fans: 482 adults Sampling margin of error for a

More information

Our Compensation Plan A NEW YOU!

Our Compensation Plan A NEW YOU! Our Compensation Plan A NEW YOU! The Anovite compensation plan was designed to provide you with multiple streams of income. With the Anovite opportunity, you get to choose how big your business will become.

More information

Clarkson University: Report on Athletic Program Participation Rates and Financial Support Data July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016

Clarkson University: Report on Athletic Program Participation Rates and Financial Support Data July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016 : Report on Athletic Program Participation Rates and Financial Support Data July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016 This report is published in compliance with the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act. Number of Full

More information

Clarkson University: Report on Athletic Program Participation Rates and Financial Support Data July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018

Clarkson University: Report on Athletic Program Participation Rates and Financial Support Data July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018 : Report on Athletic Program Participation Rates and Financial Support Data July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018 This report is published in compliance with the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act. Number of Full

More information

Clarkson University: Report on Athletic Program Participation Rates and Financial Support Data July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

Clarkson University: Report on Athletic Program Participation Rates and Financial Support Data July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017 : Report on Athletic Program Participation Rates and Financial Support Data July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017 This report is published in compliance with the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act. Number of Full

More information

FALL The Office of Institutional Effectiveness

FALL The Office of Institutional Effectiveness FALL 2013 The Office of Institutional Effectiveness 11/14/2013 SUMMARY/ABSTRACT RSTC Office of Institutional Effectiveness conducted the Fall 2013 Student Opinion Survey (SOS) beginning on September 19,

More information

lapopsurveys.org Síganos en

lapopsurveys.org Síganos en lapopsurveys.org Síganos en AmericasBarometer Brief: Ecuador 2016/17 In Depressed Times, Support for the Incumbent Slips While Support for Democracy Declines Dr. J. Daniel Montalvo, LAPOP Program Manager

More information

2020 K Street NW, Suite 410 Washington, DC (202)

2020 K Street NW, Suite 410 Washington, DC (202) 2020 K Street NW, Suite 410 Washington, DC 20006 (202) 463-7300 Interview dates: October 24 25, 2013 Interviews: 1,008 adults CONDUCTED BY IPSOS PUBLIC AFFAIRS These are findings of an Ipsos online poll

More information

U.S. Bicycling Participation Study

U.S. Bicycling Participation Study U.S. Bicycling Participation Study Report of findings from the 2016 survey Conducted by Corona Insights Commissioned by PeopleForBikes Released July 2017 Table of Contents Background and Objectives 3 Research

More information

Modal Shift in the Boulder Valley 1990 to 2009

Modal Shift in the Boulder Valley 1990 to 2009 Modal Shift in the Boulder Valley 1990 to 2009 May 2010 Prepared for the City of Boulder by National Research Center, Inc. 3005 30th Street Boulder, CO 80301 (303) 444-7863 www.n-r-c.com Table of Contents

More information

THE AP-GfK POLL July, 2016

THE AP-GfK POLL July, 2016 Public Affairs & Corporate Communications THE AP-GfK POLL July, 2016 Conducted by GfK Public Affairs & Corporate Communications A survey of the American general population (ages 18+) Interview dates: July

More information

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES July 2016 Table of Contents National American University Mission...2 Purposes...2 Core Values...3 Institutional Review Board Policy...4 IRB Membership...6 Training...7

More information

The National Citizen Survey. Bowling Green, KY. Technical Appendices

The National Citizen Survey. Bowling Green, KY. Technical Appendices The National Citizen Survey Bowling Green, KY Technical Appendices 2014 National Research Center, Inc. Boulder, CO International City/County Management Association Washington, DC Contents Appendix A: Complete

More information

Cobb Community Transit

Cobb Community Transit Cobb Community Transit Ridership Survey January 2014 1 Methodology Paper survey of 315 CCT riders 165 on local routes (margin of sampling error: ± 7.6%) 150 on express routes (margin of sampling error:

More information

Topline Results Telephone Poll March 2013

Topline Results Telephone Poll March 2013 Topline Results Telephone Poll March 2013 Results are based on interviews with 1001 London residents aged 18+. Interviews were carried out by telephone between 7 th 12 th March 2013. A representative sample

More information

Bowling Green, KY Technical Appendices

Bowling Green, KY Technical Appendices Bowling Green, KY Technical Appendices 2018 2955 Valmont Road Suite 300 777 North Capitol Street NE Suite 500 Boulder, Colorado 80301 Washington, DC 20002 n-r-c.com 303-444-7863 icma.org 800-745-8780 Contents

More information

Wildlife Ad Awareness & Attitudes Survey 2015

Wildlife Ad Awareness & Attitudes Survey 2015 Wildlife Ad Awareness & Attitudes Survey 2015 Contents Executive Summary 3 Key Findings: 2015 Survey 8 Comparison between 2014 and 2015 Findings 27 Methodology Appendix 41 2 Executive Summary and Key Observations

More information

2014 Entering Freshman Survey

2014 Entering Freshman Survey 2014 Entering Freshman Survey Content Methodology Background Profile High School Experiences Expected First-Year Experiences Other Methodology aimed to collect information about entering students background,

More information

The International Coach Federation (ICF) Global Consumer Awareness Study

The International Coach Federation (ICF) Global Consumer Awareness Study www.pwc.com The International Coach Federation (ICF) Global Consumer Awareness Study Key Results and Main Messages Fort Worth, Texas Presentation Structure 2 Research Overview 3 Research objectives To

More information

Internet Technology Fundamentals. To use a passing score at the percentiles listed below:

Internet Technology Fundamentals. To use a passing score at the percentiles listed below: Internet Technology Fundamentals To use a passing score at the percentiles listed below: PASS candidates with this score or HIGHER: 2.90 High Scores Medium Scores Low Scores Percentile Rank Proficiency

More information

Characteristics of the Labor Force - Poteau Area

Characteristics of the Labor Force - Poteau Area Not Not Number of respondents 275 42 614 71 543 391 55 Estimated Adults 21,257 2,956 47,302 5,554 41,747 29,188 3,881 Males 54.5 30.2 54.1 51.6 54.4 38.8 29.4 Females 45.5 69.8 45.9 48.4 45.6 61.2 70.6

More information

1. The data below gives the eye colors of 20 students in a Statistics class. Make a frequency table for the data.

1. The data below gives the eye colors of 20 students in a Statistics class. Make a frequency table for the data. 1. The data below gives the eye colors of 20 students in a Statistics class. Make a frequency table for the data. Green Blue Brown Blue Blue Brown Blue Blue Blue Green Blue Brown Blue Brown Brown Blue

More information

Final Report, October 19, Socioeconomic characteristics of reef users

Final Report, October 19, Socioeconomic characteristics of reef users Socioeconomic Study of Reefs in Southeast Florida - Executive Summary By Hazen and Sawyer in association with Florida State University and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, October 19, 2001

More information

A comment on recent events, and...

A comment on recent events, and... A comment on recent events, and... where we are in the current economic cycle November 15, 2016 Mark Schniepp Director Likely Trump Policies $4 to $5 Trillion in tax cuts over 10 years to corporations,

More information

TRIATHLON BUSINESS INTERNATIONAL (TBI)

TRIATHLON BUSINESS INTERNATIONAL (TBI) TRIATHLON BUSINESS INTERNATIONAL (TBI) RESPONDENT SUMMARY DATA TRIATHLON INDUSTRY CONFIDENCE INDEX 16 Prepared by MultiSport Research Jan-Feb, 16 TBI TRIATHLON INDUSTRY CONFIDENCE INDEX 16 TBI USA Industry

More information

Liverpool Lime Street station engineering work. Knowledge and support for October 2017 improvement work November 2017

Liverpool Lime Street station engineering work. Knowledge and support for October 2017 improvement work November 2017 Liverpool Lime Street station engineering work Knowledge and support for October 2017 improvement work November 2017 Overview before the engineering work starts On 30 September work began at Liverpool

More information

Satisfaction with getting to work 56% 15% 6% 6% Total distance travelled. miles per week

Satisfaction with getting to work 56% 15% 6% 6% Total distance travelled. miles per week Page/... Headlines Emersons Green Travel to Work Survey March 0 Number of respondents Main modes of travel (%) 0% Satisfaction with getting to work % % Satisfaction with getting % % % (driver with others/

More information

In 2018 a total of 56,127 students received an ATAR, 934 fewer than in The gender balance was similar to 2017.

In 2018 a total of 56,127 students received an ATAR, 934 fewer than in The gender balance was similar to 2017. ATAR 2018 Preliminary report on the Scaling of the 2018 NSW Higher School Certificate This preliminary report has been prepared to provide some information on the calculation of the Australian Tertiary

More information

Gambling Involvement and Problem Gambling in Manitoba. April 2002

Gambling Involvement and Problem Gambling in Manitoba. April 2002 Gambling Involvement and Problem Gambling in Manitoba April 2002 Gambling Involvement and Problem Gambling in Manitoba April 2002 Addictions Foundation of Manitoba David Patton, PhD David Brown, PhD Jastej

More information

Satisfaction with getting to work 54% 14% 6% 5% Total distance travelled. miles per week

Satisfaction with getting to work 54% 14% 6% 5% Total distance travelled. miles per week Page/... Travel to Work Survey March 0 Headlines South Gloucestershire LA Area Number of respondents Main modes of travel (%) Satisfaction with getting to work % Satisfaction with getting % (driver with

More information

Plurality Approve of Fed Response to Saudi Arabia

Plurality Approve of Fed Response to Saudi Arabia Plurality Approve of Fed Response Saudi Arabia Half about the dispute s effect on Canada Toron, August 13 th, 2018 In a random sampling of public opinion taken by The Forum Poll among 1777 Canadian voters,

More information

Results of the Campus Travel Survey

Results of the Campus Travel Survey Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-13-18 Results of the 2012-13 Campus Travel Survey September 2013 Brigitte K. Driller Institute of Transportation Studies University of California, Davis 1605 Tilia Street Davis,

More information

MYRTLE BEACH ELEMENTARY th Avenue North Myrtle Beach, South. 2-3 Elementary School

MYRTLE BEACH ELEMENTARY th Avenue North Myrtle Beach, South. 2-3 Elementary School MYRTLE BEACH ELEMENTARY 620 29th Avenue North Myrtle Beach, South Grades Enrollment 2-3 Elementary School 661 Students Principal Janice L. Christy 843-448-1774 Superintendent Dr. Cynthia Elsberry 843-488-6700

More information

Satisfaction with Canada Line and Connecting Buses. Wave 2

Satisfaction with Canada Line and Connecting Buses. Wave 2 Satisfaction with Canada Line and Connecting Buses March 10, 2011 Prepared by: NRG Research Group Wave 2 Suite 1380-1100 Melville Street Vancouver, BC V6E 4A6 Table of Contents Summary... 3 Method.. 8

More information

Mater Dei High School 1202 West Edinger Avenue Santa Ana, California /

Mater Dei High School 1202 West Edinger Avenue Santa Ana, California / Mater Dei High School 1202 West Edinger Avenue Santa Ana, California 92707-2191 714 / 754-7711 Questions on Athletics and Academics Athletics Describe the preferred, invited and uninvited walk-on process.

More information

Mrs. Daniel- AP Stats Ch. 2 MC Practice

Mrs. Daniel- AP Stats Ch. 2 MC Practice Mrs. Daniel- AP Stats Ch. 2 MC Practice Name: 1. Jorge s score on Exam 1 in his statistics class was at the 64th percentile of the scores for all students. His score falls (a) between the minimum and the

More information

Ad Hoc Committee on Plus/Minus Grading, Final Report August 2003

Ad Hoc Committee on Plus/Minus Grading, Final Report August 2003 Ad Hoc Committee on Plus/Minus Grading, 2002-2003 Final Report August 2003 Ad Hoc Committee on Plus/Minus Grading: Thom Fisher, Ph.D. (Chair), Meredith Wells, Ph.D., James Wells, Ph.D., Daniel Thorne,

More information

Studies in non-standard employment in Canada

Studies in non-standard employment in Canada Studies in non-standard employment in Canada Geoff Bowlby, Director, Labour Statistics Division November 1, 2008 Defining non-standard employment According to Krahn s broad definition of non-standard employment

More information

AN ASSESSMENT OF NEW JERSEY DEER HUNTER OPINION ON EXPANDING ANTLER POINT RESTRICTION (APR) REGULATIONS IN DEER MANAGEMENT ZONES 28, 30, 31, 34 AND 47

AN ASSESSMENT OF NEW JERSEY DEER HUNTER OPINION ON EXPANDING ANTLER POINT RESTRICTION (APR) REGULATIONS IN DEER MANAGEMENT ZONES 28, 30, 31, 34 AND 47 AN ASSESSMENT OF NEW JERSEY DEER HUNTER OPINION ON EXPANDING ANTLER POINT RESTRICTION (APR) REGULATIONS IN DEER MANAGEMENT ZONES 28, 30, 31, 34 AND 47 Survey mailed: April 2010 Data analyzed: June 2010

More information

Cycling Master Plan Community Engagement Session WELCOME

Cycling Master Plan Community Engagement Session WELCOME Cycling Master Plan Community Engagement Session WELCOME WHY COMMUNITIES PLAN Considering Short Term and Long Term Needs City of Lethbridge is committed to planning - to determine short term goals along

More information

B. Single Taxpayers (122,401 obs.) A. Married Taxpayers Filing jointly (266,272 obs.) Density Distribution. Density Distribution

B. Single Taxpayers (122,401 obs.) A. Married Taxpayers Filing jointly (266,272 obs.) Density Distribution. Density Distribution A. Married Taxpayers Filing jointly (266,272 obs.) Kink 15/28% at $43,850 B. Single Taxpayers (122,401 obs.) Kink 15/28% at $26,250 Density Distribution Density Distribution $0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000

More information

December 5-8, 2013 Total N= December 4-15, 2013 Uninsured N = 702

December 5-8, 2013 Total N= December 4-15, 2013 Uninsured N = 702 POLL December 5-8, 2013 Total N= 1000 December 4-15, 2013 Uninsured N = 702 All trends are from New York Times/CBS News polls unless otherwise noted. Asterisk indicates registered respondents only. 1.

More information

WYDOT Customer Satisfaction Survey 2016

WYDOT Customer Satisfaction Survey 2016 February 16 th, 2017 WYDOT Customer Satisfaction Survey 2016 Presenting results of the WYDOT Customer Satisfaction Survey, 2016 Presented By Brian Harnisch Senior Research Scientist Wyoming Survey & Analysis

More information

Satisfaction with getting to work 55% 17% 8% 7% Total distance travelled. miles per week

Satisfaction with getting to work 55% 17% 8% 7% Total distance travelled. miles per week Page/... Headlines North Bristol Suscom Travel to Work Survey March 0 Number of respondents 0 Main modes of travel (%) % Satisfaction with getting to work % % % % Satisfaction with getting % % (driver

More information

DKS & WASHINGTON COUNTY Washington County Transportation Survey

DKS & WASHINGTON COUNTY Washington County Transportation Survey PREPARED FOR: DKS & WASHINGTON COUNTY Washington County Transportation Survey April 2013 PREPARED BY: DHM RESEARCH (503) 220-0575 239 NW 13 th Ave., #205, Portland, OR 97209 www.dhmresearch.com 1 INTRODUCTION

More information

Calgary Christian School

Calgary Christian School Calgary Christian School Mission Statement Calgary Christian School is a community, called and dedicated to integrate faith and learning, reaching for excellence in equipping responsive citizens of God

More information

Downtown Tampa Parking User Survey

Downtown Tampa Parking User Survey Downtown Tampa Parking User Survey 2017 Introduction This Downtown Tampa Parking User Survey was commissioned by the Tampa Downtown Partnership and carried out by Plan Hillsborough. The survey was overseen

More information

2009 National Pharmacist Workforce Study. Visual Data

2009 National Pharmacist Workforce Study. Visual Data 2009 National Pharmacist Workforce Study Visual Data Figure 1.1: National Aggregate g Demand Index Values http://www.pharmacymanpower.com/ 5 4 3 4.28 4.07 Shortage Surplus 4.19 4.07 4.02 3.97 3.92 4.21

More information

Table of Contents

Table of Contents February 2018 Table of Contents Executive Summary Executive Summary Personas Activists Barriers Motivations Needs In The Wind Barriers Motivations Needs Hunting Buddies Barriers Motivations Needs Strategic

More information

FEDERAL WORK-STUDY PROGRAM ON-CAMPUS EMPLOYMENT GUIDE

FEDERAL WORK-STUDY PROGRAM ON-CAMPUS EMPLOYMENT GUIDE FEDERAL WORK-STUDY PROGRAM ON-CAMPUS EMPLOYMENT GUIDE UC Merced Federal Work-Study On-Campus Employment Guide (updated 7/23/14) Page 1 FWS Program Overview The Federal Work-Study Program (FWS) is a federally

More information

UK Pavement Management System. Technical Note 45. Data Topic guidance notes for UKPMS Developers. Version Number 2.00 Issue

UK Pavement Management System. Technical Note 45. Data Topic guidance notes for UKPMS Developers. Version Number 2.00 Issue UK Pavement Management System Technical Note 45 Data Topic 130-02 guidance notes for UKPMS Developers Version Number 2.00 Issue February 2019 Document Information Title (Sub Title) Technical Note 45 Data

More information

What HQ2 Finalist Cities Think about Amazon Moving to Town. Table of Contents

What HQ2 Finalist Cities Think about Amazon Moving to Town. Table of Contents What HQ2 Finalist Cities Think about Amazon Moving to Town Survey of Adult Residents in U.S. Finalist MSAs In Partnership with the Business Journals March 30 th April 3 rd, 2018 Table of Contents SURVEY

More information

OVERVIEW OF METHODOLOGY

OVERVIEW OF METHODOLOGY I N T R O D U C T I O N The Orange County Transportation Authority () is the county transportation commission responsible for planning, funding and delivering transportation improvements in Orange County

More information

GENDER PAY GAP REPORT

GENDER PAY GAP REPORT GENDER PAY GAP REPORT ABERDEEN FOOTBALL CLUB plc Company Number SC005364 GENDER PAY GAP REPORT This report contains important information on Aberdeen Football Club s (Club) gender pay gap as required by

More information