Bellevue Transportation: Challenges, Opportunities and Priorities Bellevue Downtown Association September 20, 2018

Similar documents
9/25/2018. Multi-Modal Level of Service (MMLOS) Bianca Popescu, Transportation Planner

Bellevue Downtown Association Downtown Bike Series

Draft MOBILITY ELEMENET. Community Meeting May 22, 2013

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

Community Task Force July 25, 2017

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Roadways. Roadways III.

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

City of Ottawa s Complete Streets Approach to Transportation Projects

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

Dr. M.L. King, Jr. Street North Complete Streets Resurfacing Opportunities HOUSING, LAND USE, AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MARCH 22, 2018

Implementing Complete Streets in Ottawa. Project Delivery Process and Tools Complete Streets Forum 2015 October 1, 2015

Performance Criteria for 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

Physical Implications of Complete Streets Policies

NEWMARKET UPHAM S CORNER

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

Alta Planning + Design

C C C

Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

City of Jacksonville Mobility Fee Update

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy

Complete Streets Policy Framework

T1-A - Service Reduction (Re-sizing)

Chapter 3 BUS IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Vision

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

Living Streets Policy

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

Aurora Corridor to E Line

TRANSPORTATION TRAINING TOPICS. April 6, 2010

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

Measuring Transportation: Traffic, Mobility and Accessibility

City of Davenport CitiBus Public Transportation Study. April 2015

City of Hamilton s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) Public Consultation 3 December 2015

Classification Criteria

Community Transportation Plan Acknowledgements

Sixth Line Development - Transit Facilities Plan

Bicycle and Pedestrian Chapter TPP Update Overview. TAB September 20, 2017

May 12, 2016 Metro Potential Ballot Measure Issue Brief: Local Return

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

Measuring the Distribution and Costs of Congestion. Tim Lomax Texas Transportation Institute

MAYFIELD ROAD CORRIDOR MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN. Public Workshop

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Moving Towards Complete Streets MMLOS Applications

Complete Streets Policies in Charlotte

Complete Streets Successes, Opportunities, and Challenges

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

Complete Streets: Planning, Policy & Performance

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

Land Use and Transportation Town Hall September 17, 2018

How To Encourage More Efficient Transportation in Brazilian Cities

SF Transportation Plan Update

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

Transportation Assessment

FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2004 CMR:432:04

Hennepin County Pedestrian Plan Public Comment Report

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

ECONOMY PEOPLE ENVIRONMENT

Org Chart. Steering. Committee. Project Advisory. Committee. Nicole Losch, PTP Senior Transportation. Bryan Davis, AICP Senior Transportation

Advancing Transportation Choices in Des Moines. MPO Environmental Roundtable January 9, 2018

Active Transportation Access to Transit

Multimodal Analysis in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual

Highway Transitway Corridor Study

City of White Rock. Strategic Transportation Plan. May 16, 2005

Access BART: TOD and Improved Connections. October 29, 2008

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY

Report. Typical Sections. City of Middleton, WI

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

Making Phoenix Streets Complete. City of Phoenix Complete Streets Initiative

Improving intersections for people that walk in Minneapolis

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT

Prince George s County plans, policies, and projects

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

Welcome. Background. Goals. Vision

Spring Lake Park Mounds View North Oaks. Arden Hills. Shoreview. Roseville. Little Canada. Falcon Heights SNELLING. Lilydale. West Saint Paul 35E

Central Avenue Corridor Study FPID Number:

Presentation of Staff Draft March 18, 2013 COUNTYWIDE TRANSIT CORRIDORS FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN

MCTC 2018 RTP SCS and Madera County RIFP Multi-Modal Project Eval Criteria GV13.xlsx

TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT

City of Bartow Comprehensive Plan. Transportation Element

General Plan Circulation Element Update Scoping Meeting April 16, 2014 Santa Ana Senior Center, 424 W. 3rd Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701

BRT for Berkeley A Proposal for Consideration

Measuring and Communicating Mobility:

2014 Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan

City of Charlottesville Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update

Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study. November 17, SR 90 (SW 8th Street and SW 7th Street) SW 8 th Street/SW 7 th Street PD&E Study 1

Sacramento Grid 2.0. The Downtown Transportation Study

Off-road Trails. Guidance

Transcription:

Bellevue Transportation: Challenges, Opportunities and Priorities Bellevue Downtown Association September 20, 2018 Dave Berg Transportation Director City of Bellevue

Traffic, traffic and more traffic! Funding Capital projects Ongoing maintenance and operations Regional freeway system Housing affordability Non-motorized environment Curb space management Mobility Challenges

Mobility Priorities Capital program delivery TIFIA, General CIP, Levy Construction implications Vision Zero Action Plan implementation Multimodal Level-of-Service East Link/I-405 Bus Rapid Transit and Metro service enhancements Regional system improvements Freeway Non-motorized trails Smart Mobility Plan implementation Enhancements to public right of way

The Downtown Transportation Plan and a new Multimodal Approach to Mobility Bellevue Downtown Association September 20, 2018 Kevin McDonald, AICP Principal Transportation Planner Bellevue Transportation Department

Bellevue Downtown Transportation Plan Overview DTP Planning/Final Report DTP Implementation Multimodal Level of Service Overview MMLOS Metrics, Standards, Guidelines and Implementation

Downtown Land Use Forecast Downtown Land Use Forecast 1990 2000 2010 2018 2030 2010/2030 Growth Employment 22,257 34,042 42,525 50,800 70,300 +27,775 Population 1,182 2,588 7,147 13,400 19,000 +11,853

Downtown Travel Demand Forecast Downtown Travel Demand Forecast Travel Demand Model for daily person trips (regardless of mode) for all Downtown travel, to/from/within 2010 385K Person Trips 2030 665K Person Trips

Multimodal Strategy - Mobility options for all trip purposes Walking Riding a Bicycle Downtown Mobility Driving a Car Riding Transit

People Driving (and Parking) In Downtown, the street is managed largely for moving vehicles In a few locations, the curbside is used for on-street parking, loading

Average Annual Weekday Traffic: 1990-2015 13

People Driving(Traffic Operations) Bellevue operates an Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) that adapts to traffic conditions and responds to demand from cars, transit, bicycles and pedestrians

People Riding Transit Frequent and reliable transit service works for people who need to take short trips within Downtown and for longer trips to regional destinations East Link light rail will add significant transit capacity in 2022/23

People Walking Generous sidewalks, wide crosswalks and strategically-placed mid-block crossings make walking the easiest way to get around in Downtown

People Riding Bicycles On-street bicycle facilities and secure bicycle parking support people who rely on twowheeled mobility

Pedestrian Facility Improvements 15

Bicycle Facility Improvements 16

Essential messages: A mixed, dense land use pattern creates opportunity for people to walk, bicycle, and ride transit An All of the Above mobility strategy keeps the rate of traffic growth way below the rate of land use growth reducing or eliminating the need to add vehicle capacity to maintain level-of-service A Multimodal approach inspires conversations about projects and priorities

BELLEVUE MMLOS TOPICS Bellevue Policy Evolution Vehicle Level of Service Pedestrian Level of Service Bicycle Level of Service Transit Level of Service Implementation

EVOLVING MOBILITY POLICY Comprehensive Plan 1989 o Traveling on arterials should not be too inconvenient, time consuming, or unsafe Comprehensive Plan 1993 o Establish (vehicle) LOS standards in each area of the city in light of growth management objectives Comprehensive Plan 2015 o Establish MMLOS measures, standards and targets

MMLOS SUMMARY Transportation Commission Approved April 13, 2017 Mode LOS Metric LOS Standard LOS Guideline Vehicle Pedestrian Bicycle Transit Intersections: Volume/Capacity or Average Delay Typical Urban Travel Speed on Arterials Sidewalk and Landscape Width Pedestrian Comfort, Access and Safety at Intersections Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) on Corridors Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) at Intersections Passenger Comfort, Access and Safety Transit Travel Speed on Corridors V/C: 0.80-0.95. Varies by mobility options and land use 12-20 feet, Varies by land use context Average Delay: 20-80 sec. Varies by mobility options land use Percent of posted speed limit, Varies by neighborhood context Design varies by land use context Design to achieve intended LTS varies by roadway traffic speed and volume Maintain corridor LTS at intersections. Design components vary by context Varies by transit stop/station typology 14 mph on Frequent Transit Network corridors between Activity Centers

VEHICLE LOS Intersections Corridors

VEHICLE LOS - INTERSECTIONS LOS Standard Average V/C PM Peak V/C </=.800 V/C </=.850 V/C </=.900 V/C </=.950 LOS V/C Standard as applied to Mobility Management Areas BCC 14.10.030 Bridle Trails, NE Bellevue, SE Bellevue, Newport Hills North Bellevue, South Bellevue, Richards Valley, East Bellevue Wilburton, Crossroads, Eastgate Downtown, Factoria BelRed

VEHICLE LOS ARTERIAL CORIDORS LOS Guidelines Corridor Travel Speed PM Peak LOS Corridor Travel Speed Guidelines as applied to Mobility Management Areas 100% of speed limit 90% of speed limit 75% of speed limit 50% of speed limit Bridle Trails, NE Bellevue, SE Bellevue, Newport Hills North Bellevue, South Bellevue, Richards Valley, East Bellevue Wilburton, Crossroads, Eastgate Downtown, Factoria, BelRed

VEHICLE LOS (HYPOTHETICAL) BELLEVUE WAY CORRIDOR Intersection LOS Standard V/C.95 Meets Standard Does Not meet standard Corridor Speed LOS Guideline: 15 mph Speed is >/= guideline Speed is < guideline What to do with this information? Take a look here! Identify problem and potential remedies Compare to other locations - priorities What are the MMLOS tradeoffs?

PEDESTRIAN LOS Intersections Sidewalks

PEDESTRIAN LOS

BICYCLE LOS Intersections Corridors

BICYCLE RIDER LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS (LTS)

BICYCLE RIDER LTS/LOS

BICYCLE LOS INTERSECTION COMPONENTS

TRANSIT LOS Passenger Amenities Speed on Frequent Transit Network

TRANSIT PASSENGER LOS COMPONENTS

TRANSIT LOS SPEED Frequent Transit Network (FTN) Corridors between Activity Centers Target FTN speed in Bellevue Transit Master Plan (14 mph) Transit LOS Guidance: 14 mph on FTN connections

T I T L E NEXT STEPS - MMLOS IMPLEMENTATION Capital Improvement Program Development Review

MMLOS IMPLEMENTATION DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Based on Person-Trips generated from project Determine share of improvements to mitigate impacts ½ mile for pedestrian and transit impacts Pedestrian Projects Intersection improvements Mid-block Crossings Sidewalks Transit Projects Transit stop amenities 1 ½ miles for bicycle impact Bicycle Projects

Kevin McDonald, AICP kmcdonald@bellevuewa.gov 425-452-4558