TABLES AND CHARTS 2018 UPDATE

Similar documents
Transportation 2040 Update: Travel Trends. Transportation Policy Board June 9, 2016

110 Edgar Martinez Drive South P.O. Box Seattle, WA (206) August 15, 2018

STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER 110 STATE STREET ALBANY, NEW YORK September 2015

STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER 110 STATE STREET ALBANY, NEW YORK September 2015

TAHOMA to TACOMA TRAIL NETWORK. The health, equity, transportation, environmental, and economic benefits of trails in the Puyallup Watershed

Turnpike System Projected Debt Service Coverage Ratio ($000)*

Economic Growth in the Trump Economy

Private-Public Partnership. Presentation to Metropolitan Council October 2, 2017

San Francisco s Capital Plan & the Mayor s Transportation Task Force 2030: Funding the next steps for transportation

RTC TRANSIT OPERATING STATISTICS RTC RIDE RTC RAPID RTC INTERCITY SIERRA SPIRIT

Florida s Turnpike System Projected Debt Service Coverage Ratio ($000)*

2016 Readoption BUDGET OVERVIEW

PFD, Seattle Mariners: Lease and Team Non-Relocation Agreement. Presentation to PFD Board December 10, 2018

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

Coolest Cities Results Summary

May 12, 2016 Metro Potential Ballot Measure Issue Brief: Local Return

Sound Transit Financing and 3-County Road & Transit Funding

Fiscal Year Budget Overview

Video Lottery/Tourism Promotion

2019 TOWNSHIP MANAGER COMPREHENSIVE BUDGET PRESENTATION

Carol Tomé CFO and Executive Vice President, Corporate Services

Big Changes, Unknown Impacts

Grand Haven Charter Township. Facts and Trends Affecting Grand Haven Charter Township January 2017

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2007 Special Session FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE

Citizens of the World Charter Schools Los Angeles FY Preliminary Budget Assumptions

BALLINGER LAKE GOLF COURSE LEASE AGREEMENT INTRODUCTION

National and Virginia Economic Outlook Professor Robert M. McNab Dragas Center for Economic Analysis and Policy Strome College of Business

Government finances A long term assessment. Presented by Edwina Matos Pereira

FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM

Bob Costello Chief Economist & Vice President American Trucking Associations. Economic & Motor Carrier Industry Update.

West Cities Police Communications Center Joint Powers Authority

September 2016 Financial Results

Finance & Insurance Committee Item 8 February 12, 2018

BC GAMES SOCIETY 2014/15 ANNUAL SERVICE PLAN REPORT

OHRIA Ontario Horse Racing Industry Association

Europe June Craig Menear. Chairman, CEO & President. Diane Dayhoff. Vice President, Investor Relations

Sony Centre for Performing Arts

Annual Meeting of Shareholders May 8, Oyu Tolgoi: world-class asset, development optionality, significant cash flow potential

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INTRODUCTION WHAT YOU WILL FIND IN THIS CHAPTER

BUSINESS PLAN January Richard Wooles. Executive Director # West Broadway Vancouver, BC V5Y 3W2 Tel:

ASSETS Swiss Francs Swiss Francs

Greenway Golf Lease Amendment. City Council February 20, 2018

BMO Capital Markets Annual Infrastructure & Utilities Conference 407 International February 8, 2018

The Case for New Trends in Travel

Department of Legislative Services 2012 Session

4 Ridership Growth Study

Hunter and Angler Expenditures, Characteristics, and Economic Effects, North Dakota,

Foreword 3. Mission & Objectives 4. Financial Overview 8. Money In 10. Money Out 11. Delivering Services 12. Services Explained 13

Long-Range Financial Plan Implications of Revised Sales Tax Projections for DART

Mobility and Congestion

Memorandum. To: City Council. cc: Tony Piasecki, City Manager Date: 3/3/2016. Introduction

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

Future Options for City Operated Golf Courses

FY19 Enacted Budget PA

2017 PNG Economic Survey. Rohan Fox (ANU), Stephen Howes (ANU), Nelson Atip Nema (UPNG), Marcel Schröder (UPNG and ANU)

A comment on recent events, and...

How Global Trade Is Driving Demand For Ports

COQUITLAM FILM STRATEGY

Session of HOUSE BILL No By Committee on Commerce, Labor and Economic Development 2-12

Economic Overview. Melissa K. Peralta Senior Economist April 27, 2017

Fiscal Impact of SunTrust Park and The Battery Atlanta on Cobb County Executive Summary Sept. 18, 2018

Not For Sale. An American Profile: The United States and Its People

The Importance of Managing the Tax Levy. January 20, 2012

Northwest Economic Research Center College of Urban and Public Affairs Forecast Breakfast Economic Outlook

The U.S. Economic Recovery: Why so weak and what should be done? William J. Crowder Ph.D.

Fairfax County Transportation Funding and Roadway Service Delivery Study. Study Update Transportation Advisory Commission

Financial results for Q4 and the full year 2016

PROVINCE OF SASKATCHEWAN INVESTOR PRESENTATION

Otter Tail County 2040 Transportation Plan. Asset Management Peer Exchange

BC Games Society 2016/ /19 SERVICE PLAN

RESIDENTIAL AND GOLF COURSE MARKET ANALYSIS AND FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY STUDY

A Threatened Bay: Challenges to the Future of the Penobscot Bay Region and its Communities

SUMMARY OF TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS

Growth Trends in Hampton Roads

ILLINOIS STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION FY 2018 Operating Budget Public Act

Shared Resource Conservation Manager Program Report Washington State University Energy Program, March 2013

Business Plan Presentation

Public Transport Asset Management

Global economy maintaining solid growth momentum. Canada leading the pack

Improving Mobility Without Building More Lanes

METRO. Monthly Board Report. February 2009

Revenue Estimating Conference Executive Summary for Lottery Ticket Sales and the EETF December 4, 2018

REPORT. RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the report on Pilot Results Free Transit for Seniors, dated October 25, 2012, from Oakville Transit be received.

COV DEBT CAPACITY April 5, 2016

Federal Regulatory Update WTBA/WisDOT Contractor/Engineer Conference

Local Communities. Where We re Growing: Planning Together for a Sustainable Region

Konstantin Glukhenkiy Economic Affairs Officer

REPORT Meetillig Date: June 6, 2013 Waste Management Committee

Cycling and Walking Investment Strategy & Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plans

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE IOWA RACE HORSE INDUSTRY ON THE IOWA ECONOMY

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT

May 23, 2018 Proposed No.:

2014 Economic Indicators, Trends & Observations. 51 South Main Street Janesville, WI P F RockCountyAlliance.

MTA Capital Program Amendment for Hurricane Sandy Recovery As submitted to the MTA Board December 2012

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2012 Session

Transportation Authority of Marin Renew Existing ½-cent Transportation Sales Tax

Briefing on the State of the State. presented to the. SCAA Schuyler Center for Analysis and Advocacy

LAKE BLUFF PARK DISTRICT BLAIR PARK SWIMMING POOL Questions and Answers OVERVIEW

Village of Gilman GREAT PRESENTATION. Are my taxes higher than other villages?

The U. S. Economic Outlook: Robert J. Gordon

Transcription:

TABLES AND CHARTS 2018 UPDATE As of December 31, 2017 Pierce County Library System

Table of Contents Assessed Values and Property Taxes... 3 Total Revenue... 6 Major Nontax Revenue Sources... 8 Major Expenditure Drivers... 10 Personnel & Actuals... 12 Maintenance & Operations & Actuals... 13 Library Materials: Books, E-Books, DVDs, Music, Databases, and More... 14 Capital Improvement Expenditures... 18 Contained herein are numerical data that reflect the financials for Pierce County Library System. The charts and tables are updated twice per year after the annual report is finalized and during the following fiscal year s budget process. 2

Assessed Values and Property Taxes Library District Assessed Property Values (2001-Current with 5 Year Projections) Since 2010, the Library s taxing district includes all of unincorporated Pierce County, and all cities and towns except: Tacoma, Puyallup, Fircrest, Ruston, and Carbonado. The Library District s assessed value is at $70 billion as of the end of 2017. 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Billions 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2019-2023 data based on Moody s Case-Shiller information for Tacoma-Lakewood WA Metropolitan Division as of June 2017. The Library updates the data semiannually (December and June). Significant milestones include: 1946: Pierce County Library established as a department within Tacoma Public Library and is tasked to serve unincorporated Pierce County. 1980: Orting, Steilacoom and Sumner citizens vote to annex. 1982: Eatonville citizens vote to annex. 1983: Buckley citizens vote to annex. 1987: Gig Harbor citizens vote to annex. 1993: Bonney Lake citizens vote to annex. 1995: University Place citizens vote to annex. 1996: Edgewood and Lakewood citizens vote to annex. 1999: Milton citizens vote to annex after the city terminates to provide library services. 1999: DuPont citizens vote to annex. 2003: Wilkeson citizens vote to annex after contract for library services is cancelled. 2009: Fife citizens vote to annex to the Library District. Many of the cities were part of unincorporated Pierce County served by the Library. When cities incorporated, they put ballots for their citizens to vote to join the Pierce County Library System instead of creating a city library. 3

Mill Rates and Projections (2019 2023) Mill Rate or millage is represented as $ (or cents) per $1,000 Assessed Value in a property taxing district. The Library is statutorily limited to a maximum collection of 50 per $1,000 of the Library District s assessed value. The table below shows the overall change in revenue as the change in assessed value increased and decreased since 2005. Projections Actuals Year Mill Rate Assessed Value % Change Base Property Taxes $ Change % Change New Construction 2023 45.47 $ 76,954,893,292 3.40 $ 34,998,402 $1,018,796 2.99 $ 679,000 $ 38,477,447 2022 45.65 74,424,461,597 2.32 33,979,606 986,927 3.00 657,000 37,212,231 2021 45.35 72,736,964,032 0.31 32,992,679 962,304 3.06 642,000 36,368,482 2020 44.17 72,512,176,285 0.31 32,030,375 950,796 3.11 640,000 36,256,088 2019 42.99 72,288,083,227 3.00 31,079,580 939,402 3.31 638,000 36,144,042 2018 42.94 70,182,339,375 12.35 30,140,178 963,063 3.31 619,874 35,091,303 2017 46.70 62,467,152,378 10.33 29,177,115 867,233 3.06 514,939 31,233,576 2016 50.00 56,619,764,586 6.27 28,309,882 1,670,975 6.27 3,609 28,309,882 2015 50.00 53,277,813,749 8.81 26,638,907 2,096,429 8.56-26,638,907 2014 50.00 48,964,088,146 2.94 24,482,044 698,947 2.94-24,482,044 2013 50.00 47,566,193,799-8.82 23,783,097-2,300,131-8.82-23,783,097 2012 50.00 52,166,456,544-6.79 26,083,228-1,898,976-6.79-26,083,228 2011 50.00 53,955,811,323-8.52 27,982,204 215,816 0.78 15,923 26,977,906 2010 46.95 58,984,142,315-5.00 27,766,388 216,834 0.79 399,308 29,492,071 2009 44.33 62,085,405,469 3.34 27,549,554 942,387 3.54 660,343 31,042,703 2008 44.25 60,077,557,821 13.37 26,607,167 1,171,490 4.61 859,170 30,038,779 2007 48.00 52,990,993,065 25.02 25,435,677 8,445,844 49.71-26,495,497 2006 40.02 42,385,528,523 20.05 16,989,833 870,139 5.40 696,438 21,192,764 2005 45.60 35,306,548,741 9.17 16,119,694 688,422 4.46 518,970 17,653,274 2004 47.66 32,318,475,182 6.39 15,431,272 637,432 4.31 405,227 16,169,716 2003 48.62 30,377,319,365 3.83 14,793,840 682,641 4.84 494,060 15,188,660 2002 48.14 29,257,834,251 8.26 14,111,199 598,608 4.43 437,552 14,628,917 2001 50.00 26,214,120,096 N/A 13,512,591 N/A N/A 453,978 13,512,591 @50 2019-2023 data calculated from Moody s Case-Shiller information for Tacoma-Lakewood WA Metropolitan Division as of June 2017. The Library updates the data semiannually (December and June). Significant milestones since 2001 include: 2001: Washington state voters pass Initiative 747 to restrict property tax increases to 1% over the previous year s levy, which takes effect in 2002. 2006: In a districtwide election, voters approve to reset the lawful levy from 40 per $1,000 of assessed value to 48 per $1,000 of assessed value. Four levy promises were offered: increase in open hours, materials, technology, and services to children. The four levy promises were designed to last six years, but have lasted through 2017. 2010: Recession and the nationwide housing crisis begins to affect districtwide property values. From 2011 through 2016, due to decreasing housing values, the Library was at its statutory limit of 50 per $1,000 of assessed value. 2016: The Library s revenue restored to the last highest lawful limit in 2010. 4

Annual Change in Assessed Values with Case-Shiller Projections (Actuals through 2017) 30.00% 25.00% 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% -5.00% -10.00% -15.00% 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Actual AV Increase Case-Shiller Projected Future Low (-1%) Future High (+8%) Pierce County Assessor-Treasurer actuals; future trends calculated from Case-Shiller Tacoma-Lakewood WA Metropolitan Division as of June 2017. Calculating projected trends for the district s value requires a complicated formula processed onto the Cash-Shiller data. Historically, low projections were within -1% of the actual change, and high projections were within +8.01% of the actual change. As of the June 2017 Case-Shiller data, projections show that the change in assessed value will likely slow down, if not altogether level off at no change. 5

Total Revenue Per Capita Revenue (all sources of revenue) $80.00 $70.00 $60.00 $50.00 $50.15 $50.86 $51.02 $51.92 $52.89 $49.50 $51.86 $52.21 $53.29 $49.74 $44.91 $46.54 $40.00 $30.00 $30.26 $31.55 $33.28 $33.70 $34.33 $35.33 $23.96 $24.94 $25.68 $26.10 $27.51 $21.39 $20.00 $10.00 $0.00 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Significant influences on revenue per capita: Beginning in 2001, property tax increases were limited to 1% plus new construction, which usually amounts to an additional 2%. In 2007, revenues increased from the 2016 districtwide election, when voters approved to reset the lawful levy from 40 per $1,000 of assessed value to 48 per $1,000 of assessed value. From 2011 through 2013, revenues decreased due to the recession s effects on property values. The maximum lawful levy was restored by 2015. Beginning 2016, the Library s revenue returned to the 1% plus new construction limit. During this period, the Library s service area population grew by 44%, from 418,000 in 1995 to 600,000 in 2017. 6

Total Revenues (Excluding Use of Cash Reserves) $40,000,000 14,046,698 14,735,505 15,351,552 15,977,242 17,468,049 18,009,440 26,414,980 27,674,594 28,627,737 28,634,961 28,564,891 26,694,758 24,616,725 25,526,372 28,063,748 29,709,541 30,779,848 31,973,700 32,912,400 33,862,400 34,824,000 35,810,200 36,828,200 $35,000,000 $30,000,000 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 New Revenues $5,000,000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Levy Lid LiP ed Revenues Projected Revenues Actual Revenues $0 CPU-U source: Bureau of Labor and Statistics, Average Annual for Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton Urban measure. Significant milestones: In 2006, voters approved to restore the Library s revenue from 40 to 48 per $1,000 assessed value. The Library s promise to the voters was to sustain the increased services for six years. In 2010, voters in the City of Fife approved annexation to the Library. In 2011, the recession begins to impact the Library s revenue as property values plummet throughout Pierce County. The recession s impact on revenue hit hardest in 2012 and 2013. During those years, the Library used its cash reserves to balance budgets. From 2014 through 2016, the Library recovered its last lawful highest revenue limit established in 2010. 7

Major Nontax Revenue Sources Library fines and investments have historically been the next largest sources of revenue. Library fines are received when customers pay late fees, currently at 15 per day. Investment proceeds are received when investing available cash in Pierce County s investment pool. Library Fines & Actuals $800,000 $700,000 $600,000 370,000 400,000 410,000 430,000 450,000 460,000 530,000 560,000 600,000 555,000 605,000 615,000 615,000 615,000 600,000 550,000 450,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 ed Fines Projected Fines Actual Fines $0 Significant influences on fines: In 2009, the Library conducted a Fine Forgiveness program to encourage reading and the return of books. Because electronic books incur no late fines they just simply stop being available on the reading devices fines have been decreasing since 2010. Fines are dependent on how much the collection is being used, and due to the recession during which the library was seeing less use, circulation decreased and thus did fines. In late 2015, the Library implemented an automatic renewal system available in the online catalog, which greatly reduced fines. Due to customer feedback, this feature was subsequently turned off in November 2016. Revenue from fines is anticipated to level off between $400,000 and $450,000 per year, until the materials budget increases. 8

Investment & Actuals $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 ed Investments Projected Investments Actual Investments $0 Significant influences on investments revenue: In 2005, available cash to invest had increased and rates were stable at around 2% annual rate. In 2007, revenue peaked due to cash for planned sustainability was increased from the levy lid lift. In 2008, interest rates plummeted due to the Federal Reserve s actions to counter the effects of the recession. Had rates remained the same, the Library s revenue would have neared $500,000 per year. Rates were at their lowest in 2015 when investment return rates were at 0.01%. Beginning 2016, rates began increasing. As of late 2017, rates are at 1.1%. For the foreseeable future, while rates increase, the total revenue will likely level off as the Library begins using available cash to pay for operations. 9

Major Expenditure Drivers Library expenditures fall into four categories: Personnel: wages, benefits, overtime, additional hours. Materials: books, e-books, movies, music, databases. Maintenance & Operations: supplies, equipment, services, utilities, travel, contracts, and others. Other: inter-fund transfers, set-asides, and contingencies. The chart below shows the first three categories. This depicts the cost of daily operations. 120% 100% Must reduce resource % allocaxons to close a projected $1.1m gap in 2019. 80% 13.0% 16.0% 14.0% 16.4% 13.1% 15.5% 13.4% 16.0% 13.8% 16.0% 13.2% 16.0% 11.0% 16.0% 11.4% 16.1% 11.4% 15.8% 10.7% 16.1% 12.6% 16.1% 11.4% 16.0% 12.2% 13.0% 12.8% 12.8% 13.4% 12.7% 13.1% 11.9% 14.0% 12.3% 16.1% 11.1% 16.3% 10.8% 60% 40% 67.5% 68.1% 67.1% 67.6% 67.2% 67.9% 62.8% 69.3% 69.6% 64.2% 67.1% 69.6% 72.9% 73.4% 70.9% 70.3% 69.7% 71.0% 71.9% 20% 0% 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Personnel Materials Maintenance & OperaXons 2019 Proj. Personnel costs are approximately 71% of the Library s annual expenditures, and is the largest budget investment. The wage and benefit strategy is to be a competitive employer for recruitment and retention, while containing costs to the extent possible. Some wage increases are tied to the CPI-U, per the Collective Bargaining Agreement for union represented employees. Benefits are brokered through Association for Washington Cities to leverage the larger pool of employers. This helps contain benefit costs for the Library. Materials costs make up for about 11% of the Library s annual expenditures. Because the offerings are diverse, ranging from print material to databases, the Library estimates how much is available and purchasers work within the allocated budgets. Over time, as costs continue to increase and the budget remains static, fewer items are purchased. Maintenance and Operations costs are established by setting the required costs, such as utilities, leases, and contracts, supplies, and repairs, then creating a work plan to budget the remainder of purchases, such as furniture and computers. Other costs depend entirely on how much is needed to pay for capital improvements and contingencies. 10

Regional CPI-U Trend (High/Mid/Low) 6.00% 5.00% 4.00% 3.00% 2.00% 1.00% 0.00% -1.00% 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Actual CPI-U Moody's Projected Future Low (-1%) Future High (+.07%) CPI source: Actuals from Bureau of Labor and Statistics & June-June Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton. Trends from Moody s Seattle-Tacoma- Bellevue CPI-U data as of June 2017. Calculating projected trends for the district s CPI-U requires a formula processed onto the Moody s data. Historically, low projections were within -1% of the actual change and high projections were within +.7% of the actual change. The trend for the next 6 years is for the CPI-U to between 1.7% and 3.5%. 11

Personnel & Actuals The Library is a full-service provider of library services to the community, and its primary service delivery is through a well-trained and fully engaged workforce. For 2018, excluding substitutes, 93% of the workforce is covered by the Collective Bargaining Agreement and 7% are non-union, regular employees. The ratio of benefit costs to overall personnel costs is 27.4%. $30,000,000 $25,000,000 16,594,716 19,168,513 20,275,222 18,719,865 19,173,376 19,092,226 19,118,554 19,420,295 20,407,466 21,428,745 22,356,067 23,531,100 24,500,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 9,477,426 10,044,025 10,301,070 10,803,752 11,236,934 12,007,228 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Salaries & Wages Benefits Projected Personnel Actual Personnel 2019 Proj. $0 2019 in the above chart is depicted using existing conditions and is provided only as a reference. In late 2018, the Library and its Union may implement a new Collective Bargaining Agreement for at least 2019. 12

Maintenance & Operations & Actuals $7,000,000 1,995,933 2,108,828 2,010,645 2,138,114 2,304,470 2,338,608 2,889,601 3,163,346 3,316,862 3,063,756 Part of the overages are offset by Erate reimbursements 3,604,185 3,057,500 3,089,520 3,284,010 3,769,484 3,895,960 4,306,030 5,149,000 5,354,960 5,569,158 5,791,925 6,023,602 6,264,546 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 M&O Projected M&O Actual M&O $0 Maintenance and operations (M&O) costs include a wide-variety of purchases and payments, including office supplies, equipment, professional services, contractual obligations, maintenance needs, utilities and telecommunications, travel, registrations for training/conferences, and other miscellaneous. In 2018, the Library moved the majority of computer and furnishing purchases from the Capital Improvement Fund to the general fund, as these items were considered replacement of small equipment and furniture. 13

Library Materials: Books, E-Books, DVDs, Music, Databases, and More Annual Circulation History: 1946 2016 (2017 estimated) Recession 10 9 8 7 6 Levy lid lip 5 4 Millions 3 2 System expansion bond 1946 1951 1956 1961 1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011 2016 1 0 Includes checking out of books, music, movies, and e-books. 2017 circulation is estimated at 6,300,000. Significant influences on circulation: In 1986, voters approved a districtwide bond to build facilities and expand materials. In 2006, voters approved a districtwide levy lid lift to raise its operating funding by $8.4 million per year. Also in 2006, electronic books gained momentum. In 2010, the Library experienced the nationwide recession as property values plummeted, leading to budget reductions to purchasing materials beginning in 2011. 14

Materials History (Actuals 1995-2016) 22% 20% 18.4% 18% 16% 14% 12% 16.3% 16.3% 15.3% 15.5% 16.0% 14.1% 13.0% 12.6% 12.1% 11.0% 16.0% 15.9% 16.1% 15.8% 16.2% 16.4% 15.4% 13.6% 13.3% 13.0% 12.5% 12.3% 11.9% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 The materials budget can be calculated as a percentage of total revenue anticipated for the year. Significant influences on the budget history: Recognizing that it was low for like-sized libraries in the 1990s, the Library made a significant effort in increasing the size of the materials offerings to the public. The goal was 16% of revenues allocated to the materials budget, which was met between 2001 and 2011. During the recession, the materials budget was reduced in order to maintain open hours. Afterwards, as costs continued to increase, even though the budget remained the same the materials budget saw a decrease in its buying capacity. By 2018, the materials budget as a percentage of overall revenue returned to 1996 levels. A major factor in determining the amount spent on materials depends on available shelving space. Most of the current facilities were built from the 1986 system expansion project. As purchases increased considerably to serve the public, the number of materials that could be placed on shelves had become a limiting factor. 15

Materials Expenditures per Capita History (Actuals 1995-2016) $10.00 $9.00 $8.00 $8.14 $8.09 $8.07 $8.42 $8.61 $7.72 $7.00 $6.00 $6.15 $5.68 $6.01 $6.09 $6.87 $6.49 $6.41 $5.91 $5.00 $4.35 $4.88 $4.76 $4.87 $4.62 $4.00 $3.00 $2.63 $2.85 $3.06 $3.30 $3.53 $2.00 $1.00 $0.00 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Another method for interpreting the materials budget is to normalize it with the population of the service area. As the service area grows, more materials are needed to keep up with its anticipated use. Significant influences to the materials expenditure per capita include: In 2006, voters approved a districtwide levy lid lift to raise its operating funding by $8.4 million per year. In 2010, the Library experienced the nationwide recession as property values plummeted, leading to budget reductions to purchasing materials beginning in 2011. Provided on the following page are two years showing the comparisons among 12 other libraries in Washington State. In 2007 the Library was third among peer libraries, and by 2016 it was in the middle. Pierce County Library System and Kitsap Regional Library system declined most. 16

Materials Expenditures per Capita Comparison (2016) $0 $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 $9 $10 $11 $12 $13 Seable Public $12.57 North Central Regional $10.47 King County Library $9.77 Sno-Isle Regional $8.20 Fort Vancouver Regional Timberland Regional $6.99 $7.25 Pierce County Library $6.49 Tacoma Public Library Spokane County $5.94 $5.87 Yakima Valley Spokane Public Kitsap Regional Mid-Columbia Library $4.64 $4.63 $4.60 $4.60 Washington State Library 2016 data. Materials Expenditures per Capita Comparison (2007 post Levy Lid Lift) $0 $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 $9 $10 $11 $12 $13 Seable Public King County Library $9.31 $9.58 Pierce County Library Sno-Isle Regional $7.85 $8.14 North Central Regional Tacoma Public Library Timberland Regional $6.32 $6.66 $7.12 Kitsap Regional $5.56 Spokane County Yakima Valley Mid-Columbia Library Spokane Public Fort Vancouver Regional $4.65 $4.55 $4.15 $4.10 $4.02 Washington State Library 2007 data. 17

Capital Improvement Expenditures The Library currently employs a Capital Improvement Fund to pay for major purchases, maintenance, and related expenses. The majority of funds to pay for these projects come from transfers from the general fund. Capital project budgets are created by addressing essential maintenance of facilities and implementing infrastructure improvements. Capital Project History (Excludes Carry Forwards) $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 3,623,100 3,990,140 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 1,092,000 525,600 976,762 958,187 1,304,934 2,195,101 1,571,500 1,474,600 1,995,700 1,632,000 1,224,000 1,869,500 1,405,000 1,917,000 511,500 1,250,000 1,300,000 1,352,000 1,406,100 1,462,300 $0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Significant influences on Capital Improvement budget: 2004 and 2007 included significant funds to replace the electronic catalog and financial system, respectively. 2010 and 2011 included budgets for significant committed projects: new Fife Library, moving the Milton/Edgewood and University Place libraries. 2015 included budgets for significant update of the Library s computer servers and network infrastructure. For 2018, in order to balance the budget, the Library greatly reduced the capital projects. Beginning in 2019 and for the next 11 years, significant maintenance costs will return, including the replacement of HVACs, carpeting, roofs, and vehicles. 18

Capital Improvement Fund Transfer History (Actuals 2002-2016) $7,000,000 $6,000,000 6,375,043 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 3,375,599 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 854,592 476,813 2002 2003 1,915,721 319,545 2004 2005 1,503,492 1,382,530 353,853 2006 2007 2008 2009 1,149,874 2010 2011 814,563 2012 2013 495,689 1,760,245 2014 1,137,218 2015 1,188,382 2016 986,194 2017 411,500 2018 1,250,000 2019 1,300,000 2020 1,352,000 2021 1,406,100 2022 1,462,300 2023 Capital Improvement Fund Ending Fund Balance (Actuals 1998-2016) $4,500,000 $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 1,662,861 1,922,103 1,492,760 2,585,741 2,090,602 1,596,679 2,100,129 2,003,174 2,736,075 3,855,066 3,258,147 1,356,481 2,066,743 948,389 2,175,013 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 $0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Projec 2018 Est. 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Significant influences on Capital Improvement Fund transfers and ending fund balance: Beginning in late 1990s, the Library established a policy and practice to increase the fund balance. This was done by setting aside a portion of the annual operating budget to be transferred during the fiscal year. Beginning in 2004, the Library updated the fiscal management policy to allow the Board to transfer unanticipated revenues and savings to the Capital Improvement Fund. From 2008 to 2010, funds available from the 2006 levy lid lift were added to the Capital Improvement Fund. In order to pay for significant committed projects (new Fife Library, moving the Milton/Edgewood and University Place libraries), the Library transferred significant funds available in the General Fund balance to the Capital Improvement Fund. 19