A District Council of the Urban Land Institute

Similar documents
Community Task Force July 25, 2017

Community Task Force March 14, 2018

Technical Working Group November 15, 2017

Afeasibility study to evaluate bus rapid transit service in the East-West Corridor connecting major employment and activity centers between downtown

NACTO Designing Cities 2014 Dongho Chang, City Traffic Engineer October 23, 2014

Community Task Force November 15, 2017

Roadways. Roadways III.

Seattle Transit Master Plan

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Planning Transit Operations and Bike Sharing Denver RTD. Bill Van Meter, Assistant General Manager, Planning March 23, 2012

How To Encourage More Efficient Transportation in Brazilian Cities

6 Screen 3 Analysis and Results

Community Task Force October 5, 2017

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

The City. Population of BH. Population of RMBH. 2.4 million inhabitants. 5.7 million inhabitants. 6.3 million trips a day

Town of Superior. Superior Trails Plan

Base Information. 1. Project Title SH7/East Arapahoe Multi-Use Path and Transit Stop Improvements. 2. Project Start/End points or Geographic Area

Preliminary Review of the T-REX Southeast Corridor Highway and Light Rail Transit Project

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

Public Consultation Centre For. Transportation Master Plan Update. Information Package

North Coast Corridor:

Chapter 6 Transportation Plan

Dear City Council Members,

MOBILITY RESULTS AREA. Budgeting For Outcomes Council Presentation January 12, 2007

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

EVAN GLASS. Montgomery County Council District 5

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

Base Information. 4. Project Contact Person, Title, Phone Number, and

North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy

Highway Transitway Corridor Study

Main-McVay Transit Study: Phase 2 Options Definition and High Level Constraints Evaluation

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

Town of Babylon Sustainable Complete Streets Policy

Transportation. Our Parker community. will develop and sustain. a safe, convenient and. efficient transportation. system incorporating

Goal 3: Foster an environment of partnerships and collaboration to connect our communities and regions to one another.

Scope of the Transit Priority Project

RapidRide Roosevelt Seat Sea t t le t le Depa De r pa t r men men t of Sept T an r sp an or sp t or a t t a ion

BUILDING THE CASE FOR TRAVEL OPTIONS IN WASHING TON COUNTY. Image: Steve Morgan. Image: Steve Morgan

We believe the following comments and suggestions can help the department meet those goals.

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master title style

Base Information. 1 st and Main Street, Longmont. Following the US287 corridor to US36 in Broomfield. Boulder County

Swift Bus Rapid Transit. June DeVoll, Community Transit & Tom Hingson, Everett Transit

Governor s Transportation Vision Panel

Nomination. Halton Region in Context

South King County High-Capacity Transit Corridor Study

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

City of Boulder. Table Mesa park n Ride Multi Use Path and Access Improvements

Base Information. 1. Project Title Erie Parkway and WCR 7 Traffic Signal Project

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

2. Context. Existing framework. The context. The challenge. Transport Strategy

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

Transit Planning at 3 Scales: the Network, Corridor, and Station Levels

Broadway from Belleview Ave to C-470. City of Littleton. Keith Reester, Director of Public Works, ,

Appendix A-2: Screen 1 Alternatives Report

Ideas + Action for a Better City learn more at SPUR.org. tweet about this #RegionalMobility

APPLICATION OVERVIEW APPLICATION FORM OUTLINE

Bus Rapid Transit on Silicon Valley s El Camino Real: Working Together to Create a Grand Boulevard Steven Fisher

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

Sixth Line Development - Transit Facilities Plan

4 Ridership Growth Study

Sustainable Campus Transportation in the United States

BRT for Berkeley A Proposal for Consideration

Access BART: TOD and Improved Connections. October 29, 2008

Aurora Corridor to E Line

Base Information. 1. Project Title County Line Road Shoulder Improvements. Start: County Line Road/17 th Avenue End: County Line Road/State Highway 66

REYKJAVÍK - NEW MOBILITY OPTIONS

Prepared For: Shieldbay Developments Inc. c/o Matson, McConnell Ltd. 2430A Bloor Street West Toronto, Ontario M6S 1P9.

Canada s Capital Region Delegation to the Velo-City Global 2010 Conference

Cities Connect. Cities Connect! How Urbanity Supports Social Inclusion

Presentation of Staff Draft March 18, 2013 COUNTYWIDE TRANSIT CORRIDORS FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN

TRANSIT & NON-MOTORIZED PLAN DRAFT FINAL REPORT Butte County Association of Governments

VISION ZERO: What will it take?

Appendix A-1: Purpose and Need Statement

June 2015 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SNAPSHOT

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

Vision Public Workshop: Findings

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

lowercase tod Rail~Volution October 22, 2013 Melanie Hare

Planning Regionally With Transit

Colorado Boulevard to US-85. City of Thornton. Darrell Alston, Traffic Engineer, ,

MCTC 2018 RTP SCS and Madera County RIFP Multi-Modal Project Eval Criteria GV13.xlsx

JOINT PARTNERSHIPS: Working Together To Support Light Rail in Santa Monica

Climate Change Action Plan: Transportation Sector Discussion Paper: Cycling

Community Task Force August 8, 2018

I-35W Solutions Alliance Project Update July 13, 2017

phoenix regional bike share program sponsorship

Appendix. A. Transportation Snapshot Report. B. Key Choices Summary. C. Reshaping Street Visualizations. D. Link to Thomas Frey s Presentation

Improving Mobility Without Building More Lanes

Balboa Area Transportation Demand Management

Van Ness Avenue BRT Overview and Scoping Process. Geary BRT CAC January 8, 2009

IBI Group November 5, 2012

Measuring and Communicating Mobility:

2016 Northwest Metro Region Mobility Report. July 2018

Gerald Ollivier Lead Transport Specialist World Bank, New Delhi. Transforming Cities through Integrated Planning Corridor Scale

Developing a Birmingham Transport Space Allocation policy. David Harris Transport Policy Manager Economy Directorate Birmingham City Council

Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee

Active Transportation on the Rise

Base Information. Montview Blvd on the north and Dartmouth Avenue on the south. City of Aurora

WHITE PAPER: TRANSIT SERVICE FOR SOUTH SHAGANAPPI

Van Ness Avenue Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) San Francisco Environment Commission Policy Committee

Transcription:

A District Council of the Urban Land Institute

Thank you to our sponsors! A District Council of the Urban Land Institute

Thank you to our Community Partners! A District Council of the Urban Land Institute

A District Council of the Urban Land Institute Jordan Block, Planner/Urban Designer, RNL Design; Co-chair, ULI Colorado TOD Committee

A District Council of the Urban Land Institute Chris Nevitt (moderator), City-wide Manager for Transit Oriented Development, City and County of Denver

A District Council of the Urban Land Institute Macro Panel Crissy Fanganello Director of Transportation and Mobility, City and County of Denver

THE PROBLEM Rapid population growth in a finite space; increased congestion. Rising number of crashes leading to injuries and death. CO 2 Increased air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions cause by transportation. Deteriorating infrastructure; lack of options, access and funding; incomplete and disconnected networks.

THE PROBLEM

THE PROBLEM

THE PROBLEM DENVER CRASHES & FATALITIES HAVE INCREASED Average Percentage of Crashes Resulting in a Fatality by Mode (2013-2016) 39% 55% 7% Motorist Bike Pedestrian

VISION FOR THE FUTURE IMAGINE A MOBILITY SYSTEM THAT Is safe, reliable, affordable, accessible and convenient Completes and connects a network of multi-modal options Provides mobility freedom the freedom of choice Strengthens our economy Protects public health and our environment

METRICS & GOALS Zero deaths by 2030 Reduce single-occupant vehicle commuters from 73% to 50% by 2030 Increase bike and pedestrian modes to 15% by 2030 Increase transit mode to 15% by 2030 CO 2 80% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by 2050

STRATEGIES TO ACHIEVE GOALS ENCOURAGE MODE SHIFT ADDRESS CLIMATE & IMPROVE PUBLIC HEALTH IMPROVE SAFETY EMBRACE INNOVATIVE POLICIES, PARTNERSHIPS & TECHNOLOGIES ENHANCE FUNDING, GOVERNANCE & PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

Safety Shared Mobility Transit Bicycle & Pedestrian Parking Technology Electric Vehicles Governance, Planning & Public Involvement

Safety Shared Mobility Transit Bicycle & Pedestrian Parking Technology Electric Vehicles Governance, Planning & Public Involvement Denver deserves a safe, reliable and affordable transportation system that provides mobility freedom for all. This plan transforms our car-centric transportation network into a complete and connected multi-modal system that moves more people, more safely and more efficiently. Mayor Michael B. Hancock

Ryan Billings, Senior City Planner, City and County of Denver A District Council of the Urban Land Institute

East Colfax Bus Rapid Transit Making the Link Ryan Billings City and County of Denver

East Colfax Bus Rapid Transit Making the Link Ryan Billings City and County of Denver

In partnership with RTD, DRCOG, FTA, CDOT, and City of Aurora

Current Corridor served by 15/15L 22k weekday ridership Peak = 16 buses / hour = 3.75 min combined headway

Current Majority Auto-Dominated Shallow Lots, very few large lot opportunities Almost entirely commercial @ 10 miles Source: Tim Anderson - Flickr

History 2011 Won FTA AA/NEPA Grant Developed FOCUS Model 4 years to get to PLPA Source: Bennett Wagner Grody Architects

PLPA January 2016 Peak-period Side-running for ~ 50% of corridor (5 miles)

Pivot Outreach concluded that project should be more bold/forward thinking Why not all-day exclusive lanes? Soul Searching

New Alternative Opportunities Station Enhancements Shelter, TVMs, Lighting, Near-level boarding, etc. TSP Center-running for 50% of corridor (5 miles) Up to 50k riders in 2035; 10-15 min travel time savings

Design Opportunities Colfax as a Main St. Vision Zero TOD Curb Space/Placemaking Design Challenges Fleet (R v L boarding) Platform (far-side split, length) Medians / Drainage Left-turn consolidation Parking

Other Challenges CDOT Facility, RTD Service, third of corridor is in City of Aurora Operations Stop consolidation Shift from Limited/Local to simple 2 pattern system (i.e. Red/Blue)

Other Challenges Varying ROW = varying design opportunities BRT project is one piece of holistic approach to rebuild East Colfax

Additional renderings Other Challenges Varying ROW = varying design opportunities BRT project is one piece of holistic approach to rebuild East Colfax

Other Challenges Varying ROW = varying design opportunities BRT project is one piece of holistic approach to rebuild East Colfax

Thank You

A District Council of the Urban Land Institute Jeff Shoemaker, Executive Director, The Greenway Foundation

Grant Frontier Park

Grant Frontier Park