TRANSBAY JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY

Similar documents
SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Better Market Street Project. Project Update January 15, 2015

FALL 2014 WORKSHOPS TAKEAWAYS

TRANSIT CENTER DISTRICT. Public Realm

Vision to Action Community Coalition February 14, 2014 Briefing

Better Market Street Project Update. Urban Forestry Council September 17, 2014

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

The Bay Bridge Corridor Congestion Study

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

California Department of Transportation, District 4. Sloat Boulevard Project Skyline Blvd. to 19 th Ave. Community Update January 13, 2016

Item B1 November 19, 2009

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

Van Ness Avenue BRT Overview and Scoping Process. Geary BRT CAC January 8, 2009

REDWOOD CITY STREETCAR - ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary January 19 LPT ATTACHMENT 2.

Union City General Plan Update

GEARY CORRIDOR BUS RAPID TRANSIT Environmental Analysis. Special Intersections: Preliminary Concepts

Vehicular and Pedestrian Access to Herndon Metrorail Station. Robert B. Boxer, Director John Stuart, Clark Nexen October 28, 2015

Rebuilding Highway 7 Town Centre Boulevard to Sciberras Road

FOLSOM-HOWARD STREETSCAPE OVERVIEW

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Better Market Street. Engineering, Maintenance & Safety Committee (EMSC) February 28, 2018

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Memorandum. Fund Allocation Fund Programming Policy/Legislation Plan/Study Capital Project Oversight/Delivery Budget/Finance Contract/Agreement Other:

Municipal Class EA To Address Traffic Congestion On The Ontario Street Corridor (Grand Bend) Public Information Meeting June 4, 2018

OneBayArea Grant Application

CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Circulation in Elk Grove includes: Motor vehicles, including cars and trucks

Community Task Force March 14, 2018

Central Jersey Transportation Forum. March 2007

Comments EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

San Jose Transportation Policy

TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Agenda Staff Report

DRAFT MINUTES. CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE June 25, 2014 MEETING

EBOTS Phase 2 Outreach Summary

Feasibility Study. Expo-Downtown Bicycle Connector

Governance and Priorities Committee Report For the July 2, 2015 Meeting

Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration

TRANSIT PLANNING for LARGE EVENT VENUES

Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit: Staff-Recommended Alternative

Fitting Light Rail through Well-established Communities

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

BD RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE VISION ZERO RAMP INTERSECTION STUDY PHASE 1

CHAPTER 3. Transportation and Circulation

Portland International Airport Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (October 2003) Staff Acknowledgements

Main-McVay Transit Study: Phase 2 Options Definition and High Level Constraints Evaluation

Welcome to the McKenzie Interchange Project Open House!

Mission Bay Loop (MBL) Public Meeting

SFMTA SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Transportation 6. A. Transit Center Circulation and Access. 1. Transit Center Circulation

FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2004 CMR:432:04

Methodology for Determining Pedestrian Activity Factors

Appendix A-2: Screen 1 Alternatives Report

McKenzie Interchange Project Fall 2015 Engagement. Appendix 2: Engagement Materials and Feedback Form

Outreach Approach RENEW SF served as the primary liaison with the North Beach community; the Chinatown. Executive Summary

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

SUBJECT Memorandum of Understanding to Complete a Caltrain Grade Separation Study for the Whipple Avenue Crossing

TRAVEL PLAN: CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY CAMPUS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TRAVEL PLAN. Central European University Campus Redevelopment Project.

Dumbarton Transportation Corridor Study. Board of Directors December 6, 2017

COMMUNITY MEETING August 23, 2018

Geary Bus Rapid Transit Project

Welcome. If you have any questions or comments on the project, please contact:

South King County High-Capacity Transit Corridor Study

Chapter 3 BUS IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

District 6 & Citywide Non-Transit Project Delivery Status Report

Public Information Meeting

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY

Community Task Force July 25, 2017

Item Description: Presentation and Discussion: Berkeley Rapid Transit Locally Preferred Alternative

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

FINAL REPORT DECEMBER 2011

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

ABOUT THIS STUDY The Tenderloin-Little Saigon Community-Based Transportation Plan

APPENDIX 2 LAKESHORE ROAD TRANSPORTATION REVIEW STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Paoli Road Improvement Feasibility Study

Topics To Be Covered. Summarize Tier 2 Council Direction Discuss Mill and Ash Alternatives Next Steps

Feasibility Study of Pedestrian Crossings Along Route 7, East of Cascades Parkway and West of Dranesville Road. October 3, 2017

Montgomery Road Project Stakeholder Focus Group Meeting # 1 January 29, 2014

SETTINGS AND OPPORTUNITIES MOBILITY & ACCESS

Implementing Complete Streets in Ottawa. Project Delivery Process and Tools Complete Streets Forum 2015 October 1, 2015

ADA Transition Plan. City of Gainesville FY19-FY28. Date: November 5, Prepared by: City Of Gainesville Department of Mobility

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

Freeway ramp intersection study

Telegraph Avenue Complete Streets DRAFT Recommendations. Oakland Public Works Department September 11 and 13, 2014 Open Houses

Living Streets Policy

Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan for Public Right-of-Way Improvements

Funded Safe Routes to Transit Projects

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

122 Avenue: 107 Street to Fort Road

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

A Survey of Planning, Design, and Education for Bikeways and Bus Routes on Urban Streets

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Public Comment Meeting Geary BRT Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Report

Transcription:

THIS STAFF REPORT COVERS CALENDAR ITEM NO.: 8 FOR THE MEETING OF: April 19, 2007 TRANSBAY JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY BRIEF DESCRIPTION: This staff report provides the status of a planning feasibility study for a future pedestrian connection tunnel between the Transbay Transit Center and the BART/MUNI Metro stations on Market Street. SUMMARY: The TJPA is conducting a study of the feasibility and estimated construction cost for a new pedestrian connection tunnel along one of the following four alternative alignments. Beale Street (Alternative 1) Fremont Street (Alternative 2) First Street (Alternative 3) Ecker Place (Alternative 4) Estimated construction costs vary for each alignment, with the Beale Street and Ecker Place alignments expected to cost less than the Fremont Street or First Street alignments due to the shorter total length of the tunnel structures. There is currently no funding identified for inclusion of the pedestrian connection tunnel in Phase 1 of the Transbay Transit Center Program. Consequently, it remains a design option that would be implemented during the Caltrain Downtown Extension project in Phase 2 of the Transbay Transit Center Program, as originally envisioned in the Final Environmental Impact Statement/ Environmental Impact Report (FEIS/EIR). If adequate funding is secured, construction of the pedestrian connection tunnel appears technically feasible along any of the four alignments studied. A study report with input from City and regional stakeholders is planned for consideration by the TJPA Board at its May 2007 meeting. REPORT: FEIS/EIR Consideration of a Pedestrian Connection Tunnel The Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) that was adopted during the preparation of the FEIS/EIR included a design option for a pedestrian connection tunnel below Fremont Street between the train mezzanine level of the new Transit Center and the mezzanine level of the existing BART/MUNI Metro Embarcadero Station, as part of the Caltrain Downtown Extension Project. The tunnel was assumed to be approximately 800 feet long, and cost approximately $45 million to construct. The FEIS/EIR indicated that a pedestrian tunnel to Market Street would provide a sheltered passenger connection for transferring passengers between AC Transit bus service, Caltrain and Greyhound at the Transit Center, and the BART/MUNI Metro underground rail lines on Market Street. The pedestrian tunnel is not anticipated to substantially affect street level MUNI bus operations, although the potential exists for bus movements and public traffic on the adjacent

streets to experience fewer pedestrian conflicts and delays at intersections due to reduced pedestrian volumes at surface crosswalks. The FEIS/EIR also assumed that in addition to transferring passengers, many patrons of the new Transit Center would find the pedestrian connection tunnel a convenient pathway to cross Mission and Market streets in a weather-sheltered environment away from street traffic. In summary, the principal objectives of the pedestrian connector tunnel are to: provide a direct intermodal connection for passengers transferring between the Transit Center, principally riders of Caltrain, AC Transit, WestCAT, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans, Greyhound and the BART/MUNI Metro systems reduce passenger walking times during passenger transfers provide safe pedestrian passage under Mission and Market streets reduce pedestrian traffic congestion at surface crosswalks The Final EIS/EIR indicates that the availability of funding to construct the pedestrian connection tunnel as an issue to be resolved as the Transit Center Program proceeds. As detailed programming and concept planning for the Transbay Transit Center Program was underway, it was determined that the there was not available funding to include the pedestrian connection tunnel within Phase 1 of the Program. Should adequate funding be secured, the pedestrian connection tunnel could be included in either Phase 1 or Phase 2 of the Transbay Transit Center Program. Current Planning Feasibility Study The TJPA is currently underway with a planning feasibility study for the pedestrian connection tunnel. The following four alternative alignments are being studied. 1. Beale Street alignment connecting to the Embarcadero Station (Alternative 1) 2. Fremont Street alignment connecting to the Embarcadero Station (Alternative 2) 3. First Street alignment connecting to the Montgomery Station (Alternative 3) 4. Ecker Place alignment connecting to the Montgomery Station (Alternative 4) Each of the alignments will require that existing buried utilities be relocated in order to allow for construction of an approximately 30-foot wide tunnel structure in a cut-and-cover construction operation. The estimated cost of construction within each alignment varies depending upon the extent of utility relocation required, and the total length of the tunnel structure. The Beale Street alignment (Alternative 1) has the shortest potential length of 900 linear feet of tunnel connecting to the Embarcadero Station, if constructed during Phase 2 when the below ground train box is currently planned to be constructed. If the Beale Street tunnel alignment were constructed during Phase 1, an additional 300 foot length of tunnel would be required to extend the tunnel to the main lobby of the new Transit Center between First and Fremont streets. The Fremont Street alignment (Alternative 2) is approximately 1,100 linear feet in length including a segment below Market Street connecting to the Embarcadero Station. The Fremont Street alignment is more costly than the Beale Street alignment due to greater expected length and cost of tunnel structure.

The First Street alignment (Alternative 3) has the longest potential length of approximately 1,400 linear feet of tunnel connecting to the Montgomery Station. It is expected to have the highest total construction cost, due to the length of tunnel and greater utility relocation costs compared to the other alternatives. The Ecker Place alignment (Alternative 4) has a total length of approximately 1,400 linear feet of tunnel connecting to the Montgomery Station. There is the potential to route the tunnel through a proposed private development project along First Street between Mission and Stevenson streets that, if feasible, could incorporate a length of tunnel of approximately 380 linear feet into the private development project, reducing the total length of tunnel to be constructed by the TJPA to approximately 1,020 linear feet. Engineering feasibility analyses are still underway for the Ecker Place alignment to identify and estimate necessary utility relocation. TJPA and PMPC staff have met with the affected stakeholders to review the alternative alignments. Included in these informational meetings were BART, Municipal Transportation Agency (MTA), Caltrain, AC Transit, the Department of City Planning, and the Redevelopment Agency. Staff will continue to work with the stakeholders through further development and refinement of the connector concept. The planning feasibility study is scheduled to be completed in May 2007, and will document the evaluation of the alternatives considering: utility relocation and construction costs construction phasing potential passenger use safety and security issues recommendations for project implementation RECOMMENDATION: This is an informational item. No action by the TJPA Board is required at this time. ENCLOSURES: 1. PowerPoint presentation of status report.

BART/Muni Metro Pedestrian Connector Study Progress Report 19 April 2007 AGENDA Background Stakeholders Objectives Scope of Work Alternative Tunnel Alignments Alternatives Evaluation Summary of Construction Costs Findings and Recommendations 1

Background MTC studies and FEIS/EIR included in the Locally Preferred Alternative: A design option for a pedestrian connection from the train mezzanine underneath Fremont Street to the BART Embarcadero Station approximately 800 feet long is estimated to cost $45.3 million. The decision for this connection versus sidewalks depends in part on available project funding. (Source: FEIS/EIR, LPA, p. 15) Stakeholders Working group: San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Bay Area Rapid Transit Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board San Francisco Planning Department San Francisco Redevelopment Agency Transbay Joint Powers Authority Program Management/Program Controls Consultant Utility agencies: DPW, SFPUC, SFFD, PG&E, Comcast, and AT&T 2

Objectives Provide a direct intermodal connection for passengers transferring between BART/Muni Metro, Caltrain, AC Transit, WestCAT SamTrans, Golden Gate Transit and Greyhound Provide convenient connection for passengers carrying luggage Accommodate special needs of elderly and disabled passengers Reduce travel time during passenger transfers Provide safe passage under Mission Street and reduce pedestrian traffic congestion at surface sidewalks Study Scope of Work Update estimate of transfer passengers Study alternative tunnel alignments Analyze construction cost, schedule and phasing Recommend implementation plan 3

Alternative Connector Alignments Embarcadero Montgomery St. Transit Center Alternative Connector Alignments 4

Typical Tunnel Section United Airlines Tunnel Chicago O Hare Airport 5

Pedestrian Tunnel Detroit Metro Airport Powell St./Westfield Entrance 6

Alternative 1 Beale St. Phase 1 Direct connection to Embarcadero Metro Station If included in Phase 1 Tunnel Length: 1,212 If included in Phase 2 Tunnel Length: 900 Available ROW Width: 82.5 Estimated Cost: $ 8M Utility Relocation $ 65M Construction $ 32M Other Project Costs $105M Total Cost Alternative 2 Fremont St. Connection to Embarcadero Metro Station Tunnel Length: 1,100 Available ROW Width: 82.5 Estimated Cost: $ 9M Utility Relocation $ 85M Construction $ 38M Other Project Costs $132M Total Cost 7

Alternative 3 First St. Connection to Montgomery Metro Station Tunnel Length: 1,400 Available ROW Width: 82.5 Estimated Cost: $ 31M Utility Relocation $ 98M Construction $ 58M Other Project Costs $187M Total Cost Alternative 4 Ecker Place (Partial) Connection to Montgomery Metro Station Tunnel Length: 1,020 Available ROW Width: Varies Estimated Cost: $ 18M Utility Relocation $ 72M Construction $ 40M Other Project Costs $130M Total Cost 8

Alternatives Evaluation Discussion Points Working Group Input Potential Use Safety & Security Utility and ROW Constraints Schedule/Phasing Summary Construction Cost (in $ Millions) Alignment 1 Beale St. Alignment 2 Fremont St. Alignment 3 First St. Alignment 4 Ecker Pl. Utility Relocation 7.8 8.6 31.4 17.9 Tunnel Construction 64.6 84.9 97.8 71.5 Other Project Costs 32.3 38.2 58.2 40.1 TOTAL 104.7 Lowest Cost 131.7 187.4 Highest Cost 129.5 9

Next Steps Complete Alternatives Evaluation Present Study Report Recommend Implementation Plan 10