Regional Bus Priority

Similar documents
Auckland Council Finance & Performance Committee Presentation

Regional Cycle Programme Update

Update June 2018 OUR 2017 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT

March Maidstone Integrated Transport Strategy Boxley Parish Council Briefing Note. Context. Author: Parish Clerk 2 March 2016

BELFAST RAPID TRANSIT. Ciarán de Búrca Director, Transport Projects Division Department for Regional Development

Auckland Transport Monthly Indicators Report 2018/19

Wellington Public Transport Spine Study

Bus and Transit Lane Review Update

ONE SIZE DOESN T FIT ALL RECONCILING OVERLAPPING TRANSPORT NETWORKS IN A CONSTRAINED URBAN ENVIRONMENT

Auckland Transport Monthly Indicators Report 2018/19

Durham Region Long Term Transit Strategy

Developing a Birmingham Transport Space Allocation policy. David Harris Transport Policy Manager Economy Directorate Birmingham City Council

Seal Extension Guidelines. Asset Management and Systems

9. Parking Supporting Statement

Service Business Plan

Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. General Manager, Transportation Services

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

York Region Population and Employment Growth

21.07 TRANSPORT CONNECTIVITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE

DYNAMIC LANES FOR AUCKLAND

A1307 Haverhill to Cambridge: Approval to consult on transport improvement concepts

WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE # 1 June 14, 2017

WHITE PAPER: TRANSIT SERVICE FOR SOUTH SHAGANAPPI

Memorandum. Fund Allocation Fund Programming Policy/Legislation Plan/Study Capital Project Oversight/Delivery Budget/Finance Contract/Agreement Other:

Birmingham Connected. Edmund Salt. Transportation Policy Birmingham City Council

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Major Mobility Improvement Program (MMIP)

Design Workshops Summary of all Feedback January 2017

REGIONAL ARTERIAL ROAD PLAN FEBRUARY

2.2 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Emphasize transit priority solutions STRATEGIC DIRECTION

AUCKLAND INNOVATION THE CITY EAST WEST TRANSPORT STUDY ABSTRACT

Christchurch 3 years on: - growing resilience

Launceston's Transport Futures. Greater travel options for the people of Launceston

Strategic Director for Environment. Enclosures Appendix A - Option drawings. Jamie Blake- Strategic Director for Environment

Pocatello Regional Transit Master Transit Plan Draft Recommendations

Corporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: June 26, 2006 NO: C012 COUNCIL-IN-COMMITTEE. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: June 22, 2006

CAMBOURNE TO CAMBRIDGE BETTER PUBLIC TRANSPORT PROJECT PHASE 2 PUBLIC CONSULTATION MADINGLEY MULCH ROUNDABOUT TO CAMBOURNE

Priced Managed Lanes in America. October 2013

Improving the Bus Network through Traffic Signalling. Henry Axon Transport for London

2. Context. Existing framework. The context. The challenge. Transport Strategy

1. Provide a dedicated westbound approach bus lane at the intersection;

University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description

Cambridge Access and Capacity Study

City of Hamilton s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) Public Consultation 3 December 2015

Bristol City Council has produced a draft Bristol Transport Strategy document.

Wellington City Council. Cycle Network Development Programme Business Case

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

Sacramento Grid 2.0. The Downtown Transportation Study

Note this page is intentionally left blank for page layout purposes

Sixth Line Development - Transit Facilities Plan

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

Welcome. If you have any questions or comments on the project, please contact:

APPENDIX 2 LAKESHORE ROAD TRANSPORTATION REVIEW STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

TRAFF IC CALMING POLICY

Chair and Members of Transportation Standing Committee. Bruce Zvaniga, P.Eng., Director, Transportation and Public Works

Mill Hill Broadway Capacity Improvement

Complete Streets Policy Framework

4 Ridership Growth Study

Item No Halifax Regional Council January 16, 2018 January 30, 2018

NOTES FROM JUNIOR COUNCIL ORIENTATION SESSION HELD ON MONDAY, JANUARY 22, 2018, AT 3:30 PM IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL

Municipality of Sofia Traffic Master Plan. Intelligent Transport Systems Strategy Andrew Walsh

Guildford Borough (Draft)

CITY OF HAMILTON PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Transportation Planning and Parking Division

Nottingham Cycle City Frequently Asked Questions

Integrated Regional Traffic Management. Michael Aherne Technical Director POLIS Conference 2009

CITY PLANNING ADMINISTRATION. The walkable city. Michael Erman, City of Stockholm Vienna/CORP 2012, 15 May 2012

The role of the Authority in promoting sustainable transport. Gerry Murphy South East Regional Assembly 27 th May 2011

Principles guiding Sport NI investment in Sporting Clubs and Sporting Winners objectives.

Washington DC Section of ITE Project Briefing

I-66 Corridor Improvements Route 15 to I-495. November 2014

3 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL TIMING AND SYNCHRONIZATION

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

CPC Parking Lot Riverside Drive. Transportation Rationale

Standing Committee on Policy and Strategic Priorities. Mount Pleasant Industrial Area Parking Strategy and Access Improvements

I-35W Solutions Alliance Project Update July 13, 2017

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

Planning for tennis in your Local Government Area. A resource from Tennis Australia

Moving Cambridge. City of Cambridge Transportation Master Plan Public Consultation Centre. March 7, :00 8:00 PM.

Regional Cycling Plan

Our journey a 20 year Transport Manifesto for the North East

Multi-Modal Transportation Programs

Kelowna On the Move. Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan

Mathematics of Planet Earth Managing Traffic Flow On Urban Road Networks

North Coast Corridor:

Highway Transitway Corridor Study

TRANSIT SIGNAL PRIORITY The Toronto Experience

Cycle traffic and the Strategic Road Network. Sandra Brown, Team Leader, Safer Roads- Design

4 DISRUPTION MANAGEMENT PLAN HIGHWAY 7 RAPIDWAY CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN BAYVIEW AVENUE AND WARDEN AVENUE TOWNS OF MARKHAM AND RICHMOND HILL

Roadways. Roadways III.

5 DECEMBER Cycling In London. Andrew Summers, Transport for London Strategy and Policy Manager Active Travel and Health.

Standing Committee on Policy and Strategic Priorities

Amendments to Essex Highway Maintenance Strategy Maintenance Policy and Standards April 2008

Afeasibility study to evaluate bus rapid transit service in the East-West Corridor connecting major employment and activity centers between downtown

Bus Lanes Improving Travel Time or Reliability

KIGALI CITY, RWANDA MODERNIZATION OF TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES. Presentation to ITC, UTwente Enschede 13 June 2018

Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies

Bus Riders of Saskatoon Meeting with City of Saskatoon Utility Services Department October 23, :30pm 2:30pm th Street West, Saskatoon

SANTA CLARA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PLAN August 2008

Transport Workshop Dearbhla Lawson Head of Transport & Infrastructure Policy & Funding University of the Third Age.

BUS RAPID TRANSIT. A Canadian Perspective. McCormick Rankin International. John Bonsall P.Eng

Transcription:

Regional Bus Priority Recommendation(s) That the Board: i) Notes the systematic review for bus priority measures on the proposed Frequent Transit Network (FTN). Executive summary The New Network public transport service design currently under consultation identifies a hierarchy of service offering: Rapid (right-of-way, high frequency), Frequent (traffic prioritised, high frequency), Connector (some traffic priority, 30 min frequency) and Targeted (local, peak-only and other targeted services). A programme of bus priority review investigation and implementation has been identified for the Frequent Transit Network (FTN) to support the implementation of the New Network service designs and improve reliability and travel speed of FTN services. A three year programme of review, investigation and implementation is currently underway. Investigation funding is included in funding forecasts for 2014/15 to 2016/17 with capital for projects confirmed for 2014/15. Capital funding for 2015/16 and 2016/17 has yet to be confirmed however the forecast to deliver the required programme is $5-6m per year; review and investigation will continue for year two and three projects. Strategic context The relevant AT strategic theme is the prioritisation of rapid and frequent public transport services. The Regional Public Transport Plan (RPTP) outlines the following policies that support the introduction of the FTN: 3.1 Integrate infrastructure and service provision. 3.2 Provide well-designed transport interchanges on the rapid and frequent transit network. 3.4 Provide bus priority measures on key corridors. 3.6 Integrate public transport with cycling and walking. 4.2 Improve public transport journey times to provide a service that is competitive with car travel.

FREQUENT SERVICE NETWORK Service layers: RAPID FREQUENT CONNECTOR LOCAL, PEAL ONLY & TARGETED Defining features: ALL DAY NETWORK SUPPORTING NETWORK Minimum frequency: 15 minutes 30 minutes Driven by demand Operating Hours: 7am - 7pm. Lower frequencies outside these hours Driven by demand Achieving Speed / Reliability: Exclusive right of Way Priority measures required Limited priority measures Figure 1: Regional Public Transport Plan (RPTP) service hierarchy One of the Public Transport key strategic priorities is the design of the New Network. The Frequent Service Network is illustrated at Figure 2 and comprises both the Rapid and FTN. Bus services on the FTN in particular will benefit from priority measures to improve reliability and travel speed. The proposed FTN will operate a minimum 15 minute frequency (7am to 7pm 7 days a week). Figure 2: 2016/17 Frequent Service Network Background Bus priority measures improve bus service reliability and speed through traffic signal preemption, bus lanes or T2/T3 transit lanes.

The Auckland bus network currently comprises of approximately 88km of Bus and Transit (T2 and T3) lanes. There are significant gaps in the network which affect bus operations on key corridors that will need to be reviewed and addressed prior to the roll out of the FTN. The majority of the current bus and transit lanes operate only during peak hours. Bus services along the proposed FTN will be operated at high frequency and bus priority measures will need to be put in place or optimised to allow these services to operate with an efficiency aimed at making bus transport an attractive alternative to private vehicle travel. The bus priority programme is reviewing the bus priority measures on the FTN while achieving a balanced view approach to all road users. The recently completed Fanshawe Street project demonstrated travel time savings and improved reliability by installing an outbound bus lane. The bus priority projects are being designed to achieve similar travel time savings and reliability for the buses. Issues and options A key focus of the bus priority programme is to investigate and implement improved public transport infrastructure along each FTN corridor. The initial programme comprises 38 routes encompassing all of the FTN and are mainly on arterial and collector roads. The 2014/15 financial year targets approximately 15km of bus/transit lane implementation across the network. Another 25 km is programmed for next two financial years. Figure 3 below highlights the key projects identified over the next three years. The projects are not corridor lengths of bus lanes, but locations within these corridors that currently have high levels of congestion for buses with priority measures identified to increase operational efficiency and customer delivery. Attachment 1 identifies these. Figure 3: Bus Priority Programme of work

Financial impact OPEX funding for investigation and review is forecast at $500,000 for the 15/16 and 16/17 financial years will will be included in future years funding. $2.2 million CAPEX has been allocated for implementation of bus priority projects in the 2014/15 financial year. The projects will be a range of full priority measures and smaller minor efficiency projects. The CAPEX funding to ensure investigations proceed to detailed design and construction is forecasted to be $5-$6 million for each of the 15/16 and 16/17 financial years. This is identified below the line in the current base capex programme. Investigations will continue in preparation if funding becomes available. Stakeholder engagement Recent stakeholder engagement (AT internal, NZTA, Local Board, business association, emergency services and local residents) on the projects has been positive. The collaborative internal design approach has been complimented by the positive public response through the consultation process. Risks Due to the roll out of the frequent network there is an urgency to ensure bus priority measures are investigated and implemented to achieve service reliability across the network. Under the new PTOM contracts stringent KPIs have been set in the areas of punctuality and reliability. The bus priority programme plays a critical role in meeting these KPIs. Legal and regulatory issues All new bus priority measures will go through the Traffic Control Committee (TCC) for sign off prior to physical construction. Next steps It is proposed to continue progression of parallel streams of bus priority investigation and improvement works in the next three financial years, this includes a: 1. Systematic investigation of all future FTN routes: bus priorioty, bus lanes or transit lanes. 2. Investigation of bus priority measures in the CBD to ensure bus operational efficiency during the CRL investigation and construction phase. 3. Staged implementation of projects. 4. Continual work on reviewing of bus lane operating times to ensure region wide consistency. This review will form the basis of a strategy document to be included/ referenced in ATCOP. 5. Commencement of implementation of priority FTN routes.

Attachments Number Description 1 Map of key priorities of the programme Document ownership Submitted by Recommended by Approved for submission Brendon Main Bus Services Manager Mark Lambert Group Manager Public Transport Greg Edmonds Chief Operations Officer David Warburton Chief Executive

Attachment 1: Map of key priorities of the programme Board Meeting 25 November 2014