Comparison of Achilles Tendon Loading Between Male and Female Recreational Runners

Similar documents
The effects of CrossFit and minimalist footwear on Achilles tendon kinetics during running

Does shoe midsole temperature affect patellofemoral and Achilles tendon kinetics during running?

EFFECTS OF COURT SPECIFIC AND MINIMALIST FOOTWEAR ON THE BIOMECHANICS OF A MAXIMAL 180 CUTTING MANOEUVRE

Influence of footwear designed to boost energy return on the kinetics and kinematics of running compared to conventional running shoes

Kinematic determinants of weapon velocity during the fencing lunge in experienced épée fencers

Sinclair, Jonathan Kenneth and Bottoms, Lindsay. It is advisable to refer to the publisher s version if you intend to cite from the work.

The Test-Retest Reliability of Anatomical Co-Ordinate Axes Definition for the Quantification of Lower Extremity Kinematics During Running

Gender differences in patellofemoral load during the epee fencing lunge. Word count: Key words: Fencing, Patellofemoral pain, chronic injury

Effects of minimalist and maximalist footwear on Achilles tendon load in recreational runners

Comparison of Kinematics and Kinetics During Drop and Drop Jump Performance

Relationship between Ground Reaction Force and Stability Level of the Lower Extremity in Runners Background: Objective: Design and Setting:

EFFECTS OF SHOES ON KINETICS AND KINEMATICS OF THE SQUASH FORWARD LUNGE IN MALE PLAYERS

Effects of footwear variations on three dimensional kinematics and tibial accelerations of specific movements in American football

Foot Biomechanics Getting Back to the Base

The effects of various running inclines on three-segment foot mechanics and plantar fascia strain

Steffen Willwacher, Katina Fischer, Gert Peter Brüggemann Institute of Biomechanics and Orthopaedics, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany

Gender Differences in Hip Joint Kinematics and Kinetics During Side-Step Cutting Maneuver

Sinclair, Jonathan Kenneth, Greenhalgh, Andrew, Brooks, Darrell, Edmundson, Christopher James and Hobbs, Sarah Jane

Running Gait Mechanics. Walking vs Running. Ankle Joint Complex Sagittal Plane. As speed increases, when has walking ended and running begun?

Clinical Biomechanics

BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF RUNNING AND SOCCER SHOES: METHODOLOGY AND TESTING PROCEDURES. Ewald M. Hennig

Does Changing Step Width Alter Lower Extremity Biomechanics During Running?

Running injuries - what are the most important factors

Frontal Plane Moments Do Not Accurately Reflect Ankle Dynamics During Running

GROUND REACTION FORCE DOMINANT VERSUS NON-DOMINANT SINGLE LEG STEP OFF

Footwear Science Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:

RUNNING SHOE STIFFNESS: THE EFFECT ON WALKING GAIT

THE ANKLE-HIP TRANSVERSE PLANE COUPLING DURING THE STANCE PHASE OF NORMAL WALKING

25 Lower-Limb Muscle Function in Human Running

Ankle biomechanics demonstrates excessive and prolonged time to peak rearfoot eversion (see Foot Complex graph). We would not necessarily expect

The Effects of Simulated Knee Arthrodesis and Temporal Acclimation on Gait Kinematics

10/22/15. Walking vs Running. Normal Running Mechanics. Treadmill vs. Overground Are they the same? Importance of Gait Analysis.

THE INFLUENCE OF SLOW RECOVERY INSOLE ON PLANTAR PRESSURE AND CONTACT AREA DURING WALKING

Does isolated hip abductor fatigue lead to biomechanical changes of trunk, pelvis and lower leg during single-leg landing?

Denny Wells, Jacqueline Alderson, Kane Middleton and Cyril Donnelly

Modelling the stance leg in 2D analyses of sprinting: inclusion of the MTP joint affects joint

Load dynamics of joints in Nordic walking

Arch Height and Running Shoes: The Best Advice to Give Patients

INTERACTION OF STEP LENGTH AND STEP RATE DURING SPRINT RUNNING

Running Medicine: A Clinican s Overview Nicholas Shannon, BApSci (Clin Sci), BChiroSci

The Effect of Military Load Carriage on Ground Reaction Forces. Technical Note. Stewart A Birrell 1 Robin H Hooper 1 Roger A Haslam 1

Artifacts Due to Filtering Mismatch in Drop Landing Moment Data

Running Form Modification: When Self-selected is Not Preferred

Outline. Biomechanics of Running. Biomechanics of Running 3/11/2011. Born to Run : A Biomechanical Analysis of Barefoot vs.

Influence of a custom foot orthotic intervention on lower extremity dynamics in healthy runners

EFFECTS OF SPEED AND INCLINE ON LOWER EXTREMITY KINEMATICS DURING TREADMILL JOGGING IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS

Research Paper Review

New research that enhances our knowledge of foot mechanics as well as the effect of

A bit of background. Session Schedule 3:00-3:10: Introduction & session overview. Overarching research theme: CPTA

Purpose. Outline. Angle definition. Objectives:

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. College of Health and Human Development

The Influence of Load Carrying Modes on Gait variables of Healthy Indian Women

Impact Points and Their Effect on Trajectory in Soccer

Ground Reaction Forces and Lower Extremity Kinematics When Running With Suppressed Arm Swing

Palacký Univerzity in Olomouc Faculty of Physical Culture

COMPARISON OF BIOMECHANICAL DATA OF A SPRINT CYCLIST IN THE VELODROME AND IN THE LABORATORY

SPRINTING CHARACTERISTICS OF WOMEN S 100 METER FINALS AT THE IAAF WORLD CHAMPIONSHOPS DAEGU 2011

Manipulation of foot strike and footwear increases Achilles tendon loading during running

video Outline Pre-requisites of Typical Gait Case Studies Case 1 L5 Myelomeningocele Case 1 L5 Myelomeningocele

The Shoulder Distraction Force in Cricket Fast Bowling

Knee Kinematic Improvement after Total Knee Replacement Using a Simplified Quantitative Gait Analysis Method

Equine Trust Summer Scholarship

Footwear Science Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:

video Purpose Pathological Gait Objectives: Primary, Secondary and Compensatory Gait Deviations in CP AACPDM IC #3 1

REPORT. A comparative study of the mechanical and biomechanical behaviour of natural turf and hybrid turf for the practise of sports

Running Injuries in Adolescents Jeffrey Shilt, M.D. Part 1 Page 1

Smita Rao PT PhD. Judith F. Baumhauer MD Josh Tome MS Deborah A. Nawoczenski PT PhD

--Manuscript Draft-- comparison to Braced and Unbraced Ankles. Preston, UNITED KINGDOM

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TAEKWONDO ROUNDHOUSE KICK EXECUTED BY THE FRONT AND BACK LEG - A BIOMECHANICAL STUDY

Monday, 17 July 2006 MOG2-5: 12:45-13:00

Determination of ankle and metatarsophalangeal stiffness during walking and jogging

A COMPARISON OF SELECTED BIOMECHANICAL PARAMETERS OF FRONT ROW SPIKE BETWEEN SHORT SET AND HIGH SET BALL

Key words: biomechanics, injury, technique, measurement, strength, evaluation

Barefoot, Only Better!

An Examination of the Differences in the Angles Created in the Lower and Upper Extremities During Tennis Serves by Male and Female Players

Supplementary Figure S1

RUNNING. Normal Running 10/10/2016. Reliability and Concurrent Validity of a 2D Observational Gait Analysis Tool

Kinematic Differences between Set- and Jump-Shot Motions in Basketball

A comparison of gait biomechanics of flip-flops, sandals, barefoot and shoes

PURPOSE. METHODS Design

Posture influences ground reaction force: implications for crouch gait

ASSESMENT Introduction REPORTS Running Reports Walking Reports Written Report

An investigation of kinematic and kinetic variables for the description of prosthetic gait using the ENOCH system

The importance of physical activity throughout an individual's life is indisputable. As healthcare

Lower Extremity Joint Kinematics of Shod, Barefoot, and Simulated Barefoot Treadmill Running

Humans have been running for millions of years, but the. Effect of Minimalist Footwear on Running Efficiency: A Randomized Crossover Trial

Biomechanical analysis of the medalists in the 10,000 metres at the 2007 World Championships in Athletics

Kinematic and kinetic parameters associated with running in different shoes

A New Approach to Modeling Vertical Stiffness in Heel-Toe Distance Runners

Analysis of Gait Characteristics Changes in Normal Walking and Fast Walking Of the Elderly People

Biomechanical analysis of the penalty-corner drag-flick of elite male and female hockey players

Original Article. CHUNG-HWI YI, PhD, PT 1), SO-YEON PARK, MSc, PT 2), SANG-HEON LEE, MSc, OT 2)

Tuesday, 18 July 2006 TUA2-4: 12:00-12:15

Mutual and asynchronous anticipation and action in sports as globally competitive

Keywords. Electronic supplementary material

Barefoot Running. Ed Mulligan, PT, DPT, OCS, SCS, ATC. Clinical Orthopedic Rehabilitation Education

Gait Analysis at Your Fingertips:

SCHEINWORKS Measuring and Analysis Systems by

HPW Biomechanics

Running from injury 2

Transcription:

Journal of Human Kinetics volume 44/2014, 155-159 DOI: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0121 155 Section III Sports Training Comparison of Achilles Tendon Loading Between Male and Female Recreational Runners by Greenhalgh Andrew 1, Sinclair Jonathan 2 Recreational running is an activity with multiple reported health benefits for both sexes, however, chronic injuries caused by excessive and/or repetitive loading of the Achilles tendon are common. Males have been identified as being at an increased risk of suffering an injury to the Achilles tendon and as such, knowledge of differences in loading between the sexes may provide further information to better understand why this is the case. The aim of the current investigation was to determine whether gender differences in the Achilles tendon load exist in recreational runners. Fifteen male (age 26.74 ± 5.52 years, body height 1.80 ± 0.11 m and body mass 74.22 ± 7.27 kg) and fifteen female (age 25.13 ± 6.39 years, body height 1.68 ± 0.12 m and body mass 67.12 ± 9.11 kg) recreational runners volunteered to take part in the current investigation. Participants completed 10 trials running at 4.0 m s -1 ±5% striking a force platform (1000 Hz) with their right foot. Ankle joint kinematics were synchronously recorded (250 Hz) using an optoelectric motion capture system. Ankle joint kinetics were computed using Newton-Euler inverse-dynamics. Net external ankle joint moments were then calculated. To estimate Achilles tendon kinetics the plantarflexion moment calculated was divided by an estimated Achilles tendon moment arm of 0.05 m. Differences in Achilles tendon kinetics were examined using independent sample t-tests (p<0.05). The results indicate that males were associated with significantly (p<0.05) greater Achilles tendon loads than females. The findings from this study support the notion that male recreational runners may be at greater risk of Achilles tendon pathology. Key words: biomechanics, gender, injuries, ankle. Introduction Recreational running is an activity with multiple reported health benefits for both sexes (Egan et al., 2006; Williams, 2012; Williams, 1997). Excessive repetitive loading of the Achilles tendon can lead to overuse injuries (Hess, 2010). Overuse injuries to the Achilles tendon can range from discomfort to an inability to run and have been reported as accounting for 8% and 10% of running related injuries in males and females, respectively (Taunton et al., 2003). Research suggests a genetic predisposition to increased risk of Achilles tendon injury (Katz and Mubarak, 1984; Kraemer et al., 2012; Ribbans and Collins, 2013). Between the sexes, males have been identified as most at risk of Achilles tendon injury by a factor of 2:1 to 12:1 to their female counterparts (Hess, 2010; Houshian et al., 1998; Soma and Mandelbaum, 1994; Vosseller et al., 2013). In part this discrepancy between genders may be due to differences in the level of participation in ball sports which has been linked to high rates of Achilles injuries (Leppilahti et al., 1996). It should be noted that during running, differences in kinetics and kinematics between sexes have been well established (Chumanov et al., 2008; Ferber et al., 2003; Nigg et al., 2012; Sakaguchi et al., 2012; Sinclair et al., 2012). However with specific reference to the ankle joint kinematics in the sagittal plane which 1 - London Sport Institute, Middlesex University. 2 - Division of Sport Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, University of Central Lancashire.. Authors submitted their contribution to the article to the editorial board. Accepted for printing in the Journal of Human Kinetics vol. 44/2014 in December 2014.

156 Comparison of Achilles tendon loading between male and female recreational runners can be used to calculate Achilles tendon loading (Scott and Winter, 1990), previous research identified no significant differences between sexes while running (McKean et al., 2007; Sinclair et al., 2012). A reduction in intrinsic risk factors for Achilles tendon injury can be minimised through regular physical activity (Hess, 2010; Malvankar and Khan, 2011). While the benefits of physical exercise for tendon health are clear, a lack of rest between running sessions can lead to overall collagen degradation (Almonroeder et al., 2013). Achilles tendon injuries have been linked to longer duration of sports participation in terms of years as well as chronological age (Knobloch et al., 2008; Taunton et al., 2002; Waugh et al., 2012). It would appear that a correct balance of loading magnitude and frequency of the tendon interspersed with periods of rest may reduce the overall risk of an Achilles injury. Understanding the gender differences in Achilles tendon loading during running may therefore provide insight into the aetiology of Achilles tendon pathology in runners and allow gender specific exercise recommendations to be made. Despite the differences in injury rates of the Achilles tendon in males and females, there is a paucity of research investigating any potential differences in loading of the tendon during running between sexes. The aim of this research was to investigate if differences existed between the sexes in the loading of the Achilles tendon when normalised to bodyweight (BW), measuring tendon force during running. It was hypothesised that due to similar kinematics of the ankle joint no significant differences in Achilles tendon loading between the sexes would be observed. Material and Methods Participants Fifteen male (age 26.74 ± 5.52 years, body height 1.80 ± 0.11 m and body mass 74.22 ± 7.27 kg) and fifteen female (age 25.13 ± 6.39 years, body height 1.68 ± 0.12 m and body mass 67.12 ± 9.11 kg) recreational runners volunteered to take part in the current investigation. All were free from lower extremity injury at the time of data collection and provided written informed consent. Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Central Lancashire School of Psychology. Procedures Participants completed 10 trials running at 4.0 m s -1 ±5% striking a force platform (Kistler, Kistler Instruments Ltd, Alton, Hampshire) (1000 Hz) with their right foot. The experimental laboratory was 22 m long. Running velocity was controlled using infra-red timing gates (SmartSpeed Ltd UK) spaced 4 m apart. The stance phase of the running cycle was identified as being the duration over which 20 N of vertical force was applied to the force platform (Sinclair et al., 2011). All participants wore Saucony Pro Grid Guide 2 running shoes to avoid any influence of footwear on Achilles tendon loading (Rowson et al., 2010). Kinematics were synchronously recorded (250Hz) by an 8 camera opto-electric motion capture system (Qualisys Medical, Gothenburg, Sweden). In order to define the anatomical frames of the right foot and shank segments, this study used the calibrated anatomical systems technique (CAST) (Cappozzo et al., 1995). Retro-reflective markers were attached unilaterally to the calcaneus, 1st and 5th metatarsal heads, medial/lateral malleoli and medial/lateral femoral epicondyles. A rigid technical cluster comprised of four retroreflective markers mounted to a thin sheath of lightweight carbon fibre was securely attached to the anterior-lateral aspect of the shank segment. The foot segment was tracked using the metatarsal and calcaneus markers. Prior to data collection, a static trial was obtained which allowed the anatomical markers to be referenced in relation to the technical marker positions. Measures Three-dimensional kinematics were smoothed using a low-pass Butterworth 4 th order zero-lag filter at a cut off frequency of 12 Hz and were then quantified using Visual 3-D (C-Motion Inc, Germantown, USA). Three-dimensional rotations of the ankle joint were calculated using an XYZ cardan sequence of rotations (where X = sagittal plane; Y = coronal plane and Z = transverse plane rotation) (Sinclair et al., 2012). Ankle joint kinetics were computed using Newton-Euler inverse-dynamics. Net external ankle joint moments were then calculated. Achilles tendon load (ATL) (B.W) was determined using a predictive technique by dividing the Journal of Human Kinetics - volume 44/2014 http://www.johk.pl

by Greenhalgh Andrew and Sinclair Jonathan. 157 plantarflexion moment (PFM) by the estimated Achilles tendon moment arm (atma). This technique has been utilized previously to resolve differences in Achilles tendon load during running (Kulmala et al., 2013; Sinclair et al., 2014). The moment arm was quantified as a function of the ankle sagittal plane angle (AKA) using the procedure described by Self and Paine (2001): ATL = PFM / atma atma = -0.5910 + 0.08297 AKA 0.0002606 AKA 2 Average and instantaneous ATL loading rates (B W s -1 ) were calculated in accordance with the procedure outline by Sinclair et al. (2014). Statistical analyses Descriptive statistics (Means ± SD) were calculated for both male and female runners. Differences in Achilles tendon kinetics were examined using independent sample t-tests with significance accepted at the level of p 0.05 (Rothman 1990). Statistical procedures were conducted using SPSS version 20.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, USA). Results Table 1 presents the Achilles tendon loading parameters observed from the current study as a function of sex. Achilles tendon force The results show that males were associated with significantly greater peak PFM compared to females t (28) = 2.65, p<0.05, D = 1.00. Males also exhibited a significantly greater ATL t (28) = 2.11, p<0.05, D = 0.80 compared to females. Finally both average t (28) = 2.21, p<0.05, D = 0.84 and instantaneous t (28) = 2.36, p<0.05, D = 0.89 ATL loading rates were shown to be significantly greater in male runners. Discussion The aim of this research was to investigate whether gender differences in the Achilles tendon load were present in recreational runners. This study represents the first comparative investigation to examine the differences in Achilles tendon loading during running and may provide insight into an increased incidence of Achilles tendon pathologies in males. In support of the hypothesis the key observation from the current investigation is that Achilles tendon load parameters were significantly greater in male runners in comparison to females. This finding has potential clinical relevance with regard to the aetiology of Achilles tendon pathology in recreational runners. The pathogenesis of Achilles tendon injury is considered to be mediated through excessive and habitual loading of the tendon during dynamic movements such as running (Magnusson et al., 2010). When the magnitude and frequency of the load experienced by the tendon during running falls outside the levels that are tolerable by the tendon itself this results in degeneration of the tendon (Selvanetti et al., 1997). Table 1 Achilles tendon force measurements as a function of gender Male SD Female SD Peak force (BW) 5.22 0.86 4.94 0.45 Time to peak force (ms) 132.10 27.90 133.91 16.69 Average tendon loading rate (BW s -1 ) 42.60 16.11 37.70 5.81 Instantaneous tendon loading rate (BW s -1 ) 121.31 49.92 110.04 18.96 Editorial Committee of Journal of Human Kinetics

158 Comparison of Achilles tendon loading between male and female recreational runners Sufficient rest between bouts of running has been shown to mediate a physiologically positive influence on the tendon. This occurs through collagen synthesis, that produces hypertrophic alterations in the tendon itself (Magnusson et al., 2010). When insufficient rest is allowed this means that tendon degradation outpaces synthesis and the tendon becomes weakened, thus, its susceptibility to injury increases (Magnusson et al., 2010). The current investigation may therefore provide insight into the mechanism by which males are associated with an increased incidence of Achilles tendon pathology compared to females. In conclusion, the observations of the current investigation show that male recreational runners are associated with greater Achilles tendon load parameters in comparison to females. Given the proposed relationship between tendon loading and the aetiology of tendon pathology, the current investigation provides further insight into an increased incidence of Achilles tendon pathologies in males. Future research should seek to investigate other mechanisms linked to the aetiology of Achilles tendon pathologies and also the influence of different intervention strategies aimed at reducing the load experienced by the Achilles tendon in male runners. References Almonroeder T, Willson JD, Kernozek TW. The Effect of Foot Strike Pattern on Achilles Tendon Load During Running. Ann Biomed Eng, 2013; 41(8):1758-66 Cappozzo A, Catani F, Croce UD, Leardini A. Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. Clin Biomech, 1995; 10: 171 178 Chumanov ES, Wall-Scheffler C, Heiderscheit BC. Gender differences in walking and running on level and inclined surfaces. Clin Biomech, 2008; 23: 1260 1268 Egan E, Reilly T, Giacomoni M, Redmond L, Turner C. Bone mineral density among female sports participants. Bone, 2006; 38: 227 233 Ferber R, Davis IM, Williams 3rd DS. Gender differences in lower extremity mechanics during running. Clin Biomech, 2003; 18: 350 357 Hess GW. Achilles tendon rupture: a review of etiology, population, anatomy, risk factors, and injury prevention. Foot Ankle Spec, 2010; 3: 29 32 Houshian S, Tscherning T, Riegels-Nielsen P. The epidemiology of achilles tendon rupture in a Danish county. Injury, 1998; 29: 651 654 Katz MM, Mubarak SJ. Hereditary tendo Achillis contractures. J Pediatr Orthop, 1984; 4: 711 714 Knobloch K, Yoon U, Vogt PM. Acute and Overuse Injuries Correlated to Hours of Training in Master Running Athletes. Foot Ankle Int, 2008; 29 : 671 676 Kraemer R, Wuerfel W, Lorenzen J, Busche M, Vogt PM, Knobloch K. Analysis of hereditary and medical risk factors in Achilles tendinopathy and Achilles tendon ruptures: a matched pair analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2012; 132: 847 53 Kulmala JP, Avela J, Pasanen K, Parkkari J. Forefoot strikers exhibit lower running-induced knee loading than rearfoot strikers. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2013; 45: 2306 2313 Leppilahti J, Puranen J, Orava S. Incidence of Achilles tendon rupture. Acta Orthop, 1996; 67: 277 279 Magnusson SP, Langberg H, Kjaer M. The pathogenesis of tendinopathy: balancing the response to loading. Nat Rev Rheumatol, 2010; 6: 262 268 Malvankar S, Khan W. Evolution of the Achilles tendon: The athlete s Achilles heel? Foot, 2011; 21: 193 7 McKean KA, Nurse MA, Valiant GA. Gender differences in kinematics & kinetics during overground running. J Biomech, 2007; 40: S616 Nigg BM, Baltich J, Maurer C, Federolf P. Shoe midsole hardness, sex and age effects on lower extremity Journal of Human Kinetics - volume 44/2014 http://www.johk.pl

by Greenhalgh Andrew and Sinclair Jonathan. 159 kinematics during running. J Biomech, 2012; 45: 1692 1697 Ribbans WJ, Collins M. Pathology of the tendo Achillis: Do our genes contribute? Bone Joint J, 2013; 95: 305 313 Rothman KJ. No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology, 1990; 1: 43 46 Rowson S, McNally C, Duma SM. Can Footwear Affect Achilles Tendon Loading? Clin. J Sport Med, 2010; 20: 344 349 Sakaguchi M, Ogawa H, Shimizu N, Kanehisa H, Yanai T, Kawakami Y. Gender differences in hip and ankle joint kinematics on knee abduction during running. Eur J Sport Sci, 2014; 14: S302-309 Scott SH, Winter DA. Internal forces of chronic running injury sites. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 1990; 22: 357 369 Selvanetti A, Cipolla M, Puddu G. Overuse tendon injuries: basic science and classification. Oper Tech Sports Med, 1997; 5: 110 117 Self BP, Paine D. Ankle biomechanics during four landing techniques. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2001; 33: 1338 1344 Sinclair J, Edmundson CJ, Brooks D, Hobbs SJ. Evaluation of kinematic methods of identifying gait Events during running. International J Sports Sci and Engineering, 2011; 5: 188-192 Sinclair J, Greenhalgh A, Edmundson CJ, Brooks D, Hobbs SJ. Gender Differences in the Kinetics and Kinematics of Distance Running: Implications for Footwear Design. Int J Sport Sci Eng, 2012; 6: 118 128 Sinclair J, Taylor PJ, Edmundson CJ, Brooks D, Hobbs SJ. Influence of the helical and six available Cardan sequences on 3D ankle joint kinematic parameters. Sport Biomech, 2012; 11: 430 437 Sinclair J. Effects of barefoot and barefoot inspired footwear on knee and ankle loading during running. Clin Biomech, 29.4; 2014: 395-399 Sinclair J, Naemi R, Chockalingam N, Greenhalgh A. Investigation into the kinetics and kinematics during running in the heelless shoe. Footwear Sci, 2014: 6; 1 7 Soma CA, Mandelbaum BR. Achilles tendon disorders. Clin Sports Med, 1994; 13: 811 23 Taunton JE, Ryan MB, Clement DB, McKenzie DC, Lloyd-Smith DR, Zumbo BD. A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries. Br J Sport Med, 2002; 36: 95 101 Taunton JE, Ryan MB, Clement DB, McKenzie DC, Lloyd-Smith DR, Zumbo BD. A prospective study of running injuries: the Vancouver Sun Run In Training clinics. Br J Sport Med, 2003; 37: 239 244 Vosseller JT, Ellis SJ, Levine DS, Kennedy JG, Elliott AJ, Deland JT, Roberts MM, O'Malley MJ. Achilles Tendon Rupture in Women. Foot Ankle Int, 2013; 34 : 49 53 Waugh CM, Blazevich AJ, Fath F, Korff T. Age-related changes in mechanical properties of the Achilles tendon. J. Anat, 2012; 220: 144 155 Williams P. Relationship of distance run per week to coronary heart disease risk factors in 8283 male runners. The National Runners Health Study. Arch Intern Med, 1997; 157: 191 198 Williams PT. Non-Exchangeability of Running vs. Other Exercise in Their Association with Adiposity, and Its Implications for Public Health Recommendations. PLoS One, 2012; 7: e36360 Corresponding author: Dr. Andrew Greenhalgh London Sport Institute, University of Middlesex, London, NW4 4BT. Phone: +44 (0) 2084115292 E-mail: a.greenhalgh@mdx.ac.uk Editorial Committee of Journal of Human Kinetics