MIHTO WEST COHCORREHCY TRAFFIC IMPACT AHALYSIS Preparrd for MIHTO SPW. LLC Preparrd by PIHDER TROOTMAH COHSOL TIHG. IHC. Certifiate of Authorization Homber: 7989 25 VIsta Parkway. Soite 111 West Palm Beah. FL 33411 (561) 296-9698 #PTC13-13 September 17. 213 Revised Marh 7. 214 Revised May 7. 2 14 Revised Aogost 1 3. 2 1 4 Revlsrd Aogost 18. 214
MINTO WEST CONCURRENCY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Exhibits List of Appendies Introdution Site Data Existing (213) Traffi Conditions i ii 1 1 2 Projet Traffi Trip Generation Trip Distribution and Assignment 2 2 Future Traffi Conditions Roadway Improvements Bakground Traffi 2 3 Traffi Performane Standards Analysis Test 1 (Intersetion Analysis) Test 1 (Link Analysis) Test 2 (Five Year Analysis) Driveway Volumes Projet Phasing Conlusion 3 4 5 6 7 13 Table of Contents 13-13
MINTO WEST CONCURRENCY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2A Exhibit 28 Exhibit 2C Exhibit 3A Exhibit 38 Exhibit 3C Exhibit 3D Exhibit 4 Exhibit SA Exhibit 58 Exhibit SC Exhibit 6A Exhibit 68 Exhibit 6C Exhibit 6D Exhibit 7A Exhibit 78 Exhibit 7C Exhibit 7D Exhibit 7E Exhibit 7F Exhibit 8 Exhibit 9 Exhibit 1 OA Exhibit 1 OB Projet Loation Daily Trip Generation AM Peak Hour Trip Generation PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Projet Distribution Projet Distribution Detail Projet Traffi Assignment- AM Peak Hour Projet Traffi Assignment- PM Peak Hour Historial Growth Test 1 Intersetion Analysis Intersetion Geometry Summary Intersetions- Requested Dual Left Turn Lanes Test 1 Link Analysis -AM Peak Hour Test 1 Link Analysis - PM Peak Hour Roadway Improvements- Bakground Traffi Roadway Improvements -Total Traffi Proportionate Share Analysis- AM Peak Hour Proportionate Share Analysis - PM Peak Hour Proportionate Share Analysis - Total Proportionate Share Analysis- Cost Estimates Intersetion Proportionate Share Analysis Intersetions- Requested Dual Left Turn Lanes - Proportionate Share Okeehobee Boulevard CRALLS Mitigation Trip Generation- Test 2-5 Year Phase Projet Traffi Assignment-Test 2 - AM Peak Hour Projet Traffi Assignment- Test 2- PM Peak Hour Exhibit 11 A Test 2 Link Analysis- AM Peak Hour Exhibit 11 B Test 2 Link Analysis- PM Peak Hour Exhibit 12A Exhibit 128 Exhibit 13 Projet Driveway Volumes- Sem. Pratt-Whitney Rd Projet Driveway Volumes- East Side Projet Phasing list of Exhibits 13-73
MINTO WEST CONCURRENCY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Traffi Count Data - Links Trip Generation and Internalization Roadway Improvement Programs Committed Development- Links Intersetion Analysis Capaity Analyses Proportionate Share Analysis Appendix F Appendix G Appendix H Diversion Analysis Cost Estimates Phasing Analysis List of Appendies 13-13 ii
MINTO WEST CONCURRENCY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Introdution Pinder Troutman Consulting, In. (PTC) has been retained to ondut a traffi impat analysis for a proposed mixed use development in uninorporated Palm Beah County. The purpose of this study is to determine if the proposed development meets the requirements of Artile 12, Traffi Performane Standards (TPS), of the Palm Beah County Unified Land Development Code (ULDC). Site Data The site is loated on the east and west sides of Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road at 6th Street as shown on Exhibit 1. The following uses are proposed: 3,446 DUs Residential- Single Family Detahed 6 DUs Residential - Multi-Family Condos/Town homes Villas (Fee Simple) 3 DUs Residential- Single Family 55+ Detahed 2 DUs Residential- Single Family 55+ Attahed 15 Rooms Hotel 3, Students Community College 45, SF General Offie 6, SF Researh and Development 45, SF Light Industrial 5, SF Retail 192 Ares Park 7, SF Private Civi - Churhes 7, SF Private Civi- Community Centers 1, SF Private Civi- Day Care Centers Aess to the proposed development will be via onnetions to 6th Street, Persimmon Boulevard, Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road. Issues related to driveway loation, turn lanes and geometries will be addressed during final design. Any referene to intersetion geometries is oneptual in nature and subjet to final design and approval by others. Year 235 onditions were examined. The Property Control Numbers (PCN) for the site are: -4-43-1---11-4-43-1---12-4-43-1---73-4-4 3-2 ---1 1-4-4 3-2---9-4-43-3---12-4-43-3---13-4-43-12---1-4-43-12---12-41-43-12---33-41-43-5---13-41-43-5---14-41-43-6---1 1-41-43-6---12-41 -4 3-7---1-41-43-7---11-41 -4 3-8---1 1-41-43-8---12 Report 13-73 B-18-14
Existing (213) Traffi Conditions The 213 peak season peak hour diretional volumes for the surrounding roadway network as ompiled by the Palm Beah County Traffi Division were utilized in this report. Traffi ount data is inluded in Appendix A. Projet T raffle Trip Generation The daily and peak hour trip generation rates were obtained from Palm Beah County and the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, gh Edition. Exhibits 2A, 2B and 2C provide the daily, AM and PM peak hour trip generation data for the proposed development. NCHRP Report 684 was used to determine the internalization and balaning of trips. The internalization matries are provided in Appendix B. The pass-by traffi represents less than 25% of the adjaent street traffi. For Traffi Performane Standards purposes, based on the new external peak hour trip generation of 4,932, the radius of development influene is five (5) miles. Trip Distribution and Assignment A diretional distribution, whih was developed based on model runs using the Greater Treasure Coast Regional Planning Model (GTCRPM) and disussions with Palm Beah County, is shown on Exhibit 3A. The 5 mile radius is also shown on Exhibit 3A. Exhibit 3B provides details of the distribution diretly adjaent to the site. Exhibits 3C and 3D show the assignment of AM and PM peak hour projet traffi, respetively, as well as the projet impat perentage (% of peak hour diretional servie volume). Links outside the 5 mile radius have been highlighted on Exhibits 3C and 3. Future Traffi Conditions Roadway Improvements A review was undertaken of the FOOT Transportation Improvement Program and the Palm Beah County Five Year Road Program. Several roadway improvements are either under onstrution or sheduled for onstrution as shown on the following page with exerpts from the road programs inluded in Appendix C. Report 13-138 18-74 2
Roadway Link Improvement Shedule for Constrution Seminole Pratt-Whitney Rd- Southern Blvd to Syamore Dr 2L to 4L Under Constrution Seminole Pratt-Whitney Rd - M Canal to Orange Blvd 2L to 4L Under Constrution SR 7 Extension - Persimmon Blvd to 6th St OL to 2L Under Constrution 6th Street- Royal Palm Beah Blvd to SR 7 2L to 3L Under Constrution Seminole Pratt- Whitney Rd -Orange Blvd to Northlake Blvd 2L to 4L Under Constrution Northlake Blvd - Seminole Pratt-Whitney Rd to Hall 2L to 4L FY 215 SR 7- Okeehobee Blvd to 6th St 2L to 4L FY 216 Northlake Blvd - Hall to Coonut Blvd 2L to 4L FY 217 SR 7-6th St to Northlake Blvd OL to 4L FY 217 & 218 Roebuk Rd - SR 7 to Jog Rd OL to 4L FY 218 Southern Blvd - Lion Country Safari Rd to Forest Hill Blvd 4L to 6L FY 218 Jog Road- Roebuk Rd to S. of 45th St OL to 4L FY 218 Royal Palm Beah Blvd - M Canal to S. of Orange 2L to 3/SL FY 218 Bakground Traffi Histori growth trends and ommitted development traffi must be analyzed in the projetion of future bakground traffi volumes. Histori growth data is provided on Exhibit 4 for the surrounding roadway links. Beause the areawide histori growth is negative, histori growth was not utilized in the projetion of future traffi. Committed development data, ompiled by Palm Beah County, was reviewed and is inluded in Appendix D. Total traffi inludes existing traffi, signifiant ommitted development traffi,.5% bakground growth and Projet traffi. T raffle Performane Standards Analysis Test 1 (Intersetion Analysis) Major intersetions at the termini of the signifiantly impated projet-aessed link and major intersetions for whih a proposed development adds more than 1 O% of the total traffi on any link onneting a major intersetion are required to be analyzed. Thirty (3) intersetions were analyzed as shown on Exhibit SA with the apaity analyses inluded in Appendix E. Beause Southern Boulevard and SR 71 /Beeline Highway are Strategi Report 13-73 8-78-74 3
lntermodal System (SIS) failities and Okeehobee Boulevard is a TRIP funded faility, those intersetions were analyzed using the Highway Capaity Software. Nine (9) of the intersetions meet the adopted standards with the existing lane onfigurations. The other intersetions require improvements as desribed on Exhibit SA and shown graphially on Exhibit SB. Some of the improvements would be in onjuntion with either Assured Constrution improvements or proposed road widening improvements as shown on Exhibit SB. Exhibit SC provides a list of intersetions with single left turn lanes with volumes projeted to exeed 25 vehiles per hour. The County is requesting dual left turn lanes at these loations. Test 1 (Link Analysis) The seond part of Test 1 examines if any roadway links required to be analyzed are projeted to operate below adopted level of servie standards. Roadway links are required to be analyzed where the projet impat is greater than 1% of LOS D inside the radius of development influene and greater than 5% of LOS D outside the radius. Diversions due to new roadway onstrution of the SR 7 and Roebuk Road extensions were inluded in the future traffi projetions. The diversion analyses are provided in Appendix F. Exhibits 6A and 6B show future AM and PM peak hour _diretional traffi onditions for the analyzed roadway links. Required improvements are also shown on Exhibits 6A and 6B. Exhibits 6C and 6 show graphially the roadway link improvements required for bakground traffi and total traffi respetively. Artile 12 states that "An appliant may hoose to satisfy the transportation onurreny requirements of Palm Beah County by making a proportionate fair-share ontribution." Florida Statutes, Setion 163.318, states, "If any road is determined to be transportation defiient without the projet traffi under review, the osts of orreting that defiieny shall be removed from the projet's proportionate-share alulation." Exhibits 7 A through 7C provide the proportionate share analysis for the roadway links based on the County's methodology. The appliant proposes to onstrut the required improvement for the segment of Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road fronting the site. Exhibit 7 Report 73-13 8-18-14 4
provides the ost estimate alulations for these improvements with the ost estimate details provided in Appendix G. It should be noted, that per Florida Statutes, any trips assigned to a toll-finaned faility shall be eliminated from the proportionate share analysis whih inludes the Turnpike. There are also six (6) required intersetion improvements that are beyond the sope of the programmed and proposed roadway widening projets. Exhibit 7E provides the proportionate share analysis for these additional intersetion improvements. Exhibit 7F provides the proportionate share analysis for the dual left turn lanes that were not required for intersetion operation at level of servie. With these proportionate share payments, whih are impat fee reditable, the transportation onurreny requirement is satisfied. Beause the link of Okeehobee Boulevard, east of Jog Road, has an adopted CRALL$ standard, the County has determined that a projet that impats this link must meet the adopted point system. The assignment to this CRALL$ Faility, inluding trips assigned to all approahes of the intersetion of Okeehobee Boulevard and Jog Road, is shown below. 69 Peak Hour Trips (4,932 New External PM Peak Trips x 14% Assignment Thru Intersetion) Per the proposed Okeehobee Boulevard CRALL$ point system, the projet needs 69. points to ahieve CRALLS mitigation. The projet utilizes Strategies 5, 6, 9 and 14 to earn the 69. points needed to ahieve CRALLS mitigation. The analysis of these strategies is provided on Exhibit 8. Test 2 (Five Year Analysis) This test examines traffi onditions at the end of the fifth year of the FOOT Five Year Transportation Improvement Program. The first phase of the development in the first 5 years is projeted to be 5 single family units. Exhibit 9 provides the trip generation for this first phase. A Test 2 analysis is required for any roadway link within the radius of development influene where the projet impat is greater than 3% of LOSE, and outside the radius where the projet impat is greater than 5% of LOS E. As shown on Exhibits 1 OA and 1 OB, links of 6th Street North, Persimmon Boulevard and Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road are signifiantly impated. Exhibits 11A and 11 B provide the five year analysis of the signifiantly impated Report 13-13 8-18-14 5
links. The link of Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road from Persimmon Blvd to 6th Street North is not projeted to meet adopted Test 2 standards through Year 218. As with Test 1, widening of this link will satisfy the transportation onurreny requirements. Therefore, the requirements oft est 2 are met. Driveway Volumes AM and PM peak hour projet driveway volumes are provided on Exhibits 12A and 12B. Based on these volumes and Palm Beah County's "Parking Lot and Street Aess Design Criteria and Standards," the following auxiliary lanes are required for buildout onditions:! Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road I Driveway #1 (6th Street North/Town Center Parkway) Potential Signal Northbound -One left turn lane and one right turn lane Southbound - One left turn lane and one right turn lane Eastbound- One left turn lane and one right turn lane Westbound- One left turn lane and one right turn lane! Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road I Driveway #2 (Town Center South) Potential Signal Northbound -One left turn lane and one right turn lane Southbound- One left turn lane and one right turn lane Eastbound -One left turn lane and one right turn lane Westbound - Dual left turn lanes and one right turn lane! Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road I Driveway #3 (Persimmon Boulevard) Potential Signal Northbound- One left turn lane and one right turn lane Southbound- One left turn lane and one right turn lane Eastbound -One left turn lane and one right turn lane Westbound - Dual left turn lanes and one right turn lane! Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road I Driveway #4 Northbound -One left turn lane Southbound - One left turn lane Eastbound- One right turn lane Westbound -One right turn lane! Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road I Driveway #5 Potential Signal Northbound- One right turn lane Southbound- One left turn lane Westbound -One left turn lane and one right turn lane! Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road I Driveway #6 Southbound- One left turn lane Westbound -One right turn lane Report13-138-18-14 6
For the intersetions with two left turn lanes, a traffi signal is required. Therefore, a traffi signal should be installed when warranted. Auxiliary turn lanes should be provided on all approahes to an intersetion that warrants a traffi signal. Projet Phasing Building permits have to be phased to the proportionate share payments detailed on Exhibits 7 A thru 7F. The projet will also be phased to the Assured Constrution and proposed onstrution of Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road. See Exhibit 13 for phasing alulations and Appendix H for phased land development senarios. The phasing is summarized below. 1. No building permits for more than 39 single family dwelling units (or development generating an equivalent number of external PM peak hour inbound trips) shall be issued until the ontrats are let for the widening of Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road from Persimmon Boulevard to 6th Street N from a 2-lane faility to a 4-lane divided faility. This improvement will be impat fee reditable. 2. No building permits for more than 83 single family dwelling units (or development generating an equivalent number of external PM peak hour inbound trips) shall be issued until the ontrats are let for the Assured Constrution improvement to widen Northlake Blvd from Hall Boulevard to Coonut Boulevard from a 2-lane faility to a 4-lane divided faility. 3. No building permits for more than 98 single family dwelling units (or development generating an equivalent number of external PM peak hour inbound trips) shall be issued until the ontrats are let for the Assured Constrution improvement to widen SR 7 from Okeehobee Boulevard to 6th Street N from a 2-lane faility to a 4-lane divided faility. 4. No building permits for more than 34 single family dwelling units (or development generating an equivalent number of external PM peak hour inbound trips) shall be issued until the Property Owner makes a proportionate share payment in the amount of $718,266 whih represents the Property Owner's proportionate share of the widening of Coonut Boulevard from Temple Boulevard to Northlake Boulevard from a 2-lane faility to a 4-lane divided faility. This proportionate share amount may be applied toward onstrution of this improvement or one or more other improvements that will benefit mobility in the area impated by the projet. 5. No building permits for more than 34 single family dwelling units (or development generating an equivalent number of external PM peak hour inbound trips) shall be issued until the ontrats are let for the Assured Constrution improvement to onstrut SR 7 from 6th Street N to Northlake Boulevard as a 4-lane divided faility. Report 13-738-18-14 7
6. No building permits for more than 447 single family dwelling units (or development generating an equivalent number of external AM peak hour outbound trips) shall be issued until the ontrats are let for the Assured Constrution improvement to widen Northlake Blvd from Seminole Pratt-Whitney Boulevard to Hall Boulevard from a 2-lane faility to a 4-lane divided faility. 7. No building permits for more than 536 single family dwelling units (or development generating an equivalent number of external AM peak hour outbound trips) shall be issued until the ontrats are let for the Assured Constrution improvements at the intersetion of 6 1 h Street Nand Royal Palm Beah Boulevard. 8. No building permits for more than 728 single family dwelling units (or development generating an equivalent number of external PM peak hour inbound trips) shall be issued until the Property Owner makes a proportionate share payment in the amount of $445,583, whih represents the Property Owner's proportionate share of the dual left turn lane improvements for the 9 intersetions outlined on Exhibit 7F. This proportionate share amount may be applied toward onstrution of this improvement or one or more other improvements that will benefit mobility in the area impated by the projet. 9. No building permits for more than 872 single family dwelling units (or development generating an equivalent number of external AM peak hour outbound trips) shall be issued until the Property Owner makes a proportionate share payment in the amount of $6,821,78, whih represents the Property Owner's proportionate share of the widening of Northlake Boulevard from Coonut Boulevard to SR 7 from a 4-lane divided faility to an 8- lane divided faility. This proportionate share amount may be applied toward onstrution of this improvement or one or more other improvements that will benefit mobility in the area impated by the projet. 1. No building permits for more than 1,21 single family dwelling units (or development generating an equivalent number of external AM peak hour outbound trips) shall be issued until the ontrats are let for the Assured Constrution improvement to widen Southern Boulevard from Lion Country Safari Road to Forest Hill Boulevard from a 4-lane divided faility to a 6-lane divided faility. 11. No building permits for more than 1,141 single family dwelling units (or development generating an equivalent number of external AM peak hour outbound trips) shall be issued until the Property Owner makes a proportionate share payment in the amount of $1,246,486, whih represents the Property Owner's proportionate share of an intersetion improvement at the intersetion of Persimmon Boulevard I Royal Palm Beah Boulevard that inludes a seond southbound left turn lane. This proportionate share amount may be applied toward onstrution of this improvement or one or more other improvements that will benefit mobility in the area impated by the projet. 12. No building permits for more than 1,285 single family dwelling units (or development generating an equivalent number of external AM peak hour outbound trips) shall be issued until the Property Owner makes a proportionate share payment in the amount of $273,481, Report 13-13 8-18-14 8
whih represents the Property Owner's proportionate share of an intersetion improvement at the intersetion of Southern Boulevard I Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road that inludes a third southbound left turn lane. This proportionate share amount may be applied toward onstrution of this improvement or one or more other improvements that will benefit mobility in the area impated by the projet. 13. No building permits for more than 1,417 single family dwelling units (or development generating an equivalent number of external AM peak hour outbound trips) shall be issued until the Property Owner makes a proportionate share payment in the amount of $1,582,36, whih represents the Property Owner's proportionate share of the widening of Okeehobee Boulevard from 14 1 h Avenue to Folsom Road from a 2-lane faility to an 4-lane divided faility. This proportionate share amount may be applied toward onstrution of this improvement or one or more other improvements that will benefit mobility in the area impated by the projet. 14. No building permits for more than 1,912 single family dwelling units (or development generating an equivalent number of external AM peak hour outbound trips) shall be issued until the Property Owner makes a proportionate share payment in the amount of $4,254,579, whih represents the Property Owner's proportionate share of the widening of Northlake Boulevard from SR 7 to Beeline Highway from a 4-lane divided faility to a 6-lane divided faility. This proportionate share amount may be applied toward onstrution of this improvement or one or more other improvements that will benefit mobility in the area impated by the projet. 15. No building permits for more than 2,269 single family dwelling units (or development generating an equivalent number of external AM peak hour outbound trips) shall be issued until the ontrats are let for the Assured Constrution improvement to onstrut Roebuk Road from SR 7 to jog Road as a 4-lane divided faility or until the Property Owner makes a proportionate share payment in the amount of $2,275,, whih represents the Property Owner's proportionate share of the improvement. This proportionate share amount may be applied toward onstrution of this improvement or one or more other improvements that will benefit mobility in the area impated by the projet. 16. No building permits for more than 2,272 single family dwelling units (or development generating an equivalent number of external AM peak hour outbound trips) shall be issued until the Property Owner makes a proportionate share payment in the amount of $2,9,284, whih represents the Property Owner's proportionate share of the widening of Southern Boulevard from Forest Hill Boulevard to Cypress Head Drive from a 6-lane divided faility to an 8-lane plus divided faility and From Cypress Head Drive to Royal Palm Beah Boulevard from 6-lane divided faility to an 8-lane plus divided faility. This proportionate share amount may be applied toward onstrution of this improvement or one or more other improvements that will benefit mobility in the area impated by the projet. 17. No building permits for more than 2,38 single family dwelling units (or development generating an equivalent number of external AM peak hour outbound trips) shall be issued until the Property Owner makes a proportionate share payment in the amount of RL'fXHf 13-13 8-18-14 9
$1,32,83, whih represents the Property Owner's proportionate share of the widening of Southern Boulevard from Big Blue Trae to Forest Hill Boulevard from a 6-lane divided faility to an 8-lane divided faility. This proportionate share amount may be applied toward onstrution of this improvement or one or more other improvements that will benefit mobility in the area impated by the projet. 18. No building permits for more than 2,43 single family dwelling units (or development generating an equivalent number of external AM peak hour outbound trips) shall be issued until the Property Owner makes a proportionate share payment in the amount of $534,783, whih represents the Property Owner's proportionate share of the widening of Coonut Boulevard from Orange Boulevard to Temple Boulevard from a 2-lane faility to a 4-lane divided faility. This proportionate share amount may be applied toward onstrution of this improvement or one or more other improvements that will benefit mobility in the area impated by the projet. 19. No building permits for more than 2,581 single family dwelling units (or development generating an equivalent number of external AM peak hour outbound trips) shall be issued until the Property Owner makes a proportionate share payment in the amount of $9,855,72, whih represents the Property Owner's proportionate share of the grade separated interhange at Okeehobee Boulevard and SR 7. This proportionate share amount may be applied toward onstrution of this improvement or one or more other improvements that will benefit mobility in the area impated by the projet. 2. No building permits for more than 2,76 single family dwelling units (or development generating an equivalent number of external PM peak hour outbound trips) shall be issued until the Property Owner makes a proportionate share payment in the amount of $8,653,561, whih represents the Property Owner's proportionate share of the grade separated interhange at Northlake Boulevard and SR 71 (Beeline Highway). This proportionate share amount may be applied toward onstrution of this improvement or one or more other improvements that will benefit mobility in the area impated by the projet. 21. No building permits for more than 3,1 single family dwelling units (or development generating an equivalent number of external PM peak hour inbound trips) shall be issued until the Property Owner makes a proportionate share payment in the amount of $49,776, whih represents the Property Owner's proportionate share of the widening of Okeehobee Boulevard from Crestwood Boulevard to Royal Palm Beah Boulevard from a 4-lane divided faility to a 6-lane divided faility. This proportionate share amount may be applied toward onstrution of this improvement or one or more other improvements that will benefit mobility in the area impated by the projet. 22. No building permits for more than 3,45 single family dwelling units (or development generating an equivalent number of external AM peak hour outbound trips) shall be issued until the Property Owner makes a proportionate share payment in the amount of $4,67,77, whih represents the Property Owner's proportionate share of the widening of Southern Boulevard from Royal Palm Beah Boulevard to SR 7 from an 8-lane divided faility Report 73-738-18-14 1
to an 8-lane plus divided faility. This proportionate share amount may be applied toward onstrution of this improvement or one or more other improvements that will benefit mobility in the area impated by the projet. 23. No building permits for more than 3,2 single family dwelling units (or development generating an equivalent number of external AM peak hour outbound trips) shall be issued until the Property Owner makes a proportionate share payment in the amount of $69,277, whih represents the Property Owner's proportionate share of the widening of Royal Palm Beah Boulevard from 6 1 h Street to Orange Boulevard from a 2-lane faility to a 4-lane divided faility. This proportionate share amount may be applied toward onstrution of this improvement or one or more other improvements that will benefit mobility in the area impated by the projet. 24. No building permits for more than 3,24 single family dwelling units (or development generating an equivalent number of external AM peak hour outbound trips) shall be issued until the Property Owner makes a proportionate share payment in the amount of $1,111,573, whih represents the Property Owner's proportionate share of the widening of Northlake Boulevard from 14 1 h Avenue to Coonut Boulevard from a 4-lane divided faility to an 6-lane divided faility. This proportionate share amount may be applied toward onstrution of this improvement or one or more other improvements that will benefit mobility in the area impated by the projet. 25. No building permits for more than 3,446 single family dwelling units and 67 ondominium units (or development generating an equivalent number of external AM peak hour outbound trips) shall be issued until the Property Owner makes a proportionate share payment in the amount of $937,846, whih represents the Property Owner's proportionate share of the widening of Southern Boulevard from SR 7 to Sansbury's Way from an 8-lane divided faility to an 8-lane plus divided faility. This proportionate share amount may be applied toward onstrution of this improvement or one or more other improvements that will benefit mobility in the area impated by the projet. 26. No building permits for more than 3,446 single family dwelling units and 158 ondominium units (or development generating an equivalent number of external AM peak hour outbound trips) shall be issued until the Property Owner makes a proportionate share payment in the amount of $1,243,66, whih represents the Property Owner's proportionate share of the widening of Southern Boulevard from Benoist Farms Road to Pike Road/Turnpike from an 8- lane divided faility to an 8-lane plus divided faility. This proportionate share amount may be applied toward onstrution of this improvement or one or more other improvements that will benefit mobility in the area impated by the projet. 27. No building permits for more than 3,446 single family dwelling units, 6 ondominium units and 2 55+ detahed units (or development generating an equivalent number of external AM peak hour outbound trips) shall be issued until the Property Owner makes a proportionate share payment in the amount of $1,294, whih represents the Property Owner's proportionate share of the widening of Okeehobee Boulevard from Royal Palm Beah Boulevard to Wildat Way from a 6-lane divided faility to a 8-lane divided faility. This Report 13-13 B-18-14 11
proportionate share amount may be applied toward onstrution of this improvement or one or more other improvements that will benefit mobility in the area impated by the projet. 28. No building permits for more than 3,446 single family dwelling units, 6 ondominium units, 3 55+ detahed units and 132 55+ attahed units (or development generating an equivalent number of external AM peak hour outbound trips) shall be issued until the Property Owner makes a proportionate share payment in the amount of $623,776, whih represents the Property Owner's proportionate share of the widening of SR 71 (Beeline Highway) from Northlake Boulevard to Jog Road from a 4-lane divided faility to a 6-lane divided faility. This proportionate share amount may be applied toward onstrution of this improvement or one or more other improvements that will benefit mobility in the area impated by the projet. 29. No building permits for more than all of the 4,546 residential units (or development generating an equivalent number of external AM peak hour outbound trips) shall be issued until the Property Owner makes a proportionate share payment in the amount of $562,585, whih represents the Property Owner's proportionate share of the widening of Southern Boulevard from Sansbury's Way to Benoist Farms Road from an 8-lane divided faility to an 8-lane plus divided faility. This proportionate share amount may be applied toward onstrution of this improvement or one or more other improvements that will benefit mobility in the area impated by the projet. 3. No building permits for more than all of the 4,546 residential units and non-residential uses as outlined in Appendix H (or development generating an equivalent number of external AM peak hour outbound trips) shall be issued until the Property Owner makes a proportionate share payment in the amount of $2,514,861, whih represents the Property Owner's proportionate share of intersetion improvements at the intersetion of Southern Boulevard I Forest Hill Boulevard I Crestwood Boulevard that inlude a northbound free-flow right turn lane, northbound third through lane and northbound, eastbound and westbound triple left turn lanes. This proportionate share amount may be applied toward onstrution of this improvement or one or more other improvements that will benefit mobility in the area impated by the projet. 31. No building permits for more than all of the 4,546 residential units and non-residential uses as outlined in Appendix H (or development generating an equivalent number of external PM peak hour outbound trips) shall be issued until the Property Owner makes a proportionate share payment in the amount of $832,533, whih represents the Property Owner's proportionate share of intersetion improvements at the intersetion of Okeehobee Boulevard I Jog Road that inludes northbound triple left turn lanes. This proportionate share amount may be applied toward onstrution of this improvement or one or more other improvements that will benefit mobility in the area impated by the projet. The Property Owner must also make a CRALLS mitigation payment of $3,363,8 and establish the ridesharing and ompressed work week programs outlined for the Okeehobee Blvd CRALLS. 32. No building permits for more than all of the 4,546 residential units and non-residential uses as outlined in Appendix H (or development generating an equivalent number of external AM Report 13-13 8-18-14 12
peak hour outbound trips) shall be issued until the ontrats are let for the widening of Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road from Persimmon Boulevard to 6 1 h Street N from a 4-lane divided faility to a 6-lane divided faility. This improvement will be impat fee reditable. Conlusions This analysis shows that the proposed development, with phasing to Assured Constrution, Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road onstrution, Proportionate Share payments for several links and intersetions and provision of Okeehobee Boulevard CRALLS mitigation, meets all of the requirements of the Traffi Performane Standards of Palm Beah County. Report 13 138-18-14 13
EXHIBITS
-==::::::J I v) t-: z... :::o.,.. "' ro 1- A. "' z g rt\ '.h! [ '-v \._ VI = I II\ DlldNHOl "-I/ I I v!"---.!7./ llyml A'MV1111W O'M ll!hhjayh < r-\ 2 r1 I OYOH :>OJ L OVOH 31VlS :;: z 2 2 l) "' u < z < /\18 HJVlB WWd WAOH z i I I OHV/\319 lono::>o::> z I - I I l/\v 41Pl :;: <.;: :) Ol\l91WH 2 u z < I 1\19 OOV:JOI\V "' : 1/\VIjJOVL,. ) n( "" '-- OVOH :>Of! i < 2 u "' 8 / --.;::::../' OVOH A3Nl!HM-UV'Hd non!wls ;: ' i 'U ;:; N AVM SAHOQSNVS ::> (UtWO<;IOI OVOHB :;: <.;: :) 2 ;: 9 /\18 ll!h : DVHllnlB 9 MO.:l9 z - T- I- u o - --' I I- >< u UJ UJ a.. 1- CJ) UJ $ 1- z
Trip Gen +Internal 13-13 8-7-14 4546+2M+PC 8/13/214 Exhibit 2A Daily Trip Generation West Side Land Use Residential - SF Residential - MF Apts. Residential - MF Condos. Residential- 55+ Detahed Residential- 55+ Attahed General Offie Researh & Devel. Retail Park ITE Code Intensity 21 - DUs 22 - DUs 23 15 DUs 251 3 DUs 252 2 DUs 71 15, SF 76 425, SF 82 35, SF 412 125 Ares Internal Trip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips Trips (2) 1 /DU - 26.2% 6.65 /DU - - 26.2% 6.65 /DU 998 261 26.2% 8/DU 2,4 629 26.2% 6/DU 1,2 314 26.2% Ln (T) =.77Ln (X)+3.65 1,823 179 9.8% Ln (T) =.83Ln (X)+3.9 (3) 3,338 327 9.8% Ln (T) =.65Ln (X)+5.83 15,331 767 5.% 2.28 /Are 285 29 1.% External Interzonal Trips Trips (4) - -.% - -.% 737 84 11.4% 1,771 211 11.9% 886 13 11.6% 1,644 16 6.4% 3,11 195 6.5% 14,564 2,222 15.3% 256 19 7.4% External Pass-by Trips Trips (1) New Trips - - % - -. % - 653 - % 653 1,56 - % 1,56 783 - % 783 1,538 154 1% 1,384 2,816 282 1% 2,534 12,342 3,542 28.7% 8,8J 237 - % 2371 TOTALS 25,375 2,56 9.9% 22,869 2,94 11.6% 19,929 3,978 15,951 I East Side Land Use Residential- SF (N,O,T,U) Residential - SF IF,M,P,Q,R,Si Residential - MF Condos. Residential - MF Apts. Hotel Community College General Offie Researh & Devel. Light Industrial Retail Park Community Center Churh Dayare TOTALS ITE Code Intensity 21 1,1 DUs 21 2,436 DUs 23 45 DUs 22 - DUs 31 15 Rooms 54* 3, Students 71 3, SF 76 175, SF 11 45, SF 82 15, SF 412 67 Ares 495 7, SF 56 7, SF 565 1, SF Internal Trip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips Trips (2) 1 /DU 1,1 1,192 11.8% 1 /DU 24,36 2,874 11.8% 6.65 /DU 2,993 353 11.8% 6.65 /DU - - 11.8% 8.92 /Room 1,338 591 44.2% 2.29 /Student 6,87 1,594 23.2% Ln (T) =.77Ln (X)+3.65 3,19 432 13.9% Ln (T) =.83Ln (X)+3.9 (3) 1,598 222 13.9% 6.97 /1 SF 3,137 436 13.9% Ln (T) =.65Ln (X)+5.83 8,839 4,172 47.2% 2.28 /Are 153 47 3.5% 33.82 /1 SF 2,367 722 3.5% 9.11 /1 SF 638 195 3.5% 74.6 /1 SF 741 226 3.5% 66,243 13,56 19.7% External Interzonal External Trips Trips (2) 8,98 481 5.4% 21,486 1,182 5.5% 2,64 145 5.5%. -.% 747 64 8.6% 5,276 343 6.5% 2,677 11 4.1% 1,376 63 4.6% 2,71 111 4.1% 4,667 397 8.5% 16 -.% 1,645 26 1.6% 443 12 2.6% 515 6 1.2% 53,187 2,94 4.4% Pass-by Trips Trips (1) New Trips 8,427 - % 8,427 2,34 - % 2,34 2,495 - % 2,495 - - % - 683 68 1% 615 4,933 - % 4,933 2,567 257 1% 2,31 1,313 131 1% 1,182 2,59 259 1% 2,331 4,27 1,563 36.6% 2,77 16 - % 16 1,619 81 5% 1,538 431 22 5% 49 59 255 SO% 254 5,247 2,636 47,611 (COMBINED TOTALS I 91,618 I 15,562 I 17.%1 76,56 I 5,88 I 6.4%1 7,176 I 6,614 I I 63,562 I Rate obtained from Palm Beah State College trip generation study by Kimley-Horn. See Appendix B. 111 Soure: Palm Beah County ULDC Artile 13, unless otherwise noted. 121 Utilized average of individual AM and PM peak hour internalization rates. 131 Soure: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation 9th Edition. 141 Utilized average of individual AM and PM peak hour internalization rates with adjustments to balane with the east side interzonal trips. [ Pernalization: 23:4%]
Trip Gen +Internal 1313 8*7*14 4546+2M... PC 8/13/214 Exhibit 28 AM Peak Hour Trip Generation West Side ITE land Use Code Intensity Residential - SF 21 DUs Residential - MF Apts. 22 DUs Residl'ntial - MF Condos. 23 15 DUs Residential- 55+ Detahed 251 3 DUs Residential- 55+ Attahed 252 2 DUs General Offie 71 15, SF Researh & Devel. 76 425, SF Retail 82 35, SF Park 412 125 Ares TOTALS Trip Generation Rate (1).75 /DU (25/751 T =.491XI + 3.73 (2/8) Ln(T) =.8Ln(x)+.26 117/83).22 /DU 135/65).2 /DU 134/661 Ln(T) =.8LnlxH1.57 188/12) Ln(T) =.87Lnlxl+.86 183/17).96 /1 SF 162/381 om /Are 161/391 Total Tri Internal External Trips In Out Total Trips (2) In Out Total - 4.% - - 4.% - 12 59 71 3 4.% 12 56 68 23 43 66 3 4.% 21 42 63 14 26 4 2 4.% 14 24 38 233 32 265 22 8.3% 222 21 243 379 78 457 38 8.3% 361 58 419 28 128 336 58 17.% 176 12 278 2 1 3 1.% 2 1 3 871 367 1 238 126 1.2% 88 34 1,112 Interzonal Tri s (2).%.% 7 9.9% 7 1.6% 4 1.% 15 5.7% 26 5.7% 71 21.1% 1.% 13 1.5% External Trips Pass-by New Trips In Out Total Tri s (3) In Out Total % - - - - - - % - - - 1 51 61 - % 1 51 61 19 37 56 % 19 37 56 13 21 34 - % 13 21 34 211 17 228 23 1% 19 15 25 342 51 393 39 1% 38 46 354 139 68 27 59 28.7% 99 49 148 2 1 3 % 2 1 3 736 246 982 121 641 22 861 East Side ITE land Use Code Intensity Residential- SF (N,O,T,Ui 21 1,1 DUs Residential- SF lf.m,p,q,r,si 21 2,436 DUs Residential - MF Condos. 23 45 DUs Residential - MF Apts. 22 - DUs Hotel 31 15 Rooms Community Colle 54* 3, Students General Offie 71 3, SF Researh & Devel. 76 175, SF Light Industria I 11 45, SF Retail 82 15, SF Park 412 67 Ares Community Center 495 7, SF Churh 56 7, SF Dave are 565 1, SF TOTALS Trip Generation Rate (1).75 /DU 125/751.75 /DU 125/751 Ln(T) =.8Ln(x)+.26 (17/831 T -.49(XI + 3.73 12/8).53 /Room 159/411.11 /Student 187/131 Ln(TI =.8Lnlxl+1.57 188/121 LnlTI =.87Lnlxi+.86 (83/17).92 /1 SF 188/121.% /1 SF 162/381.2 /Are 161/391 2.5 /1 SF 166/341.56 /1 SF (62/381 12.18 /1 SF 153/471 Total Tri )5 Internal External Trips In Out Total Trips (2) In Out Total 19 568 758 57 7.5% 177 524 71 457 1,37 1,827 137 7.5% 426 1,264 1,69 29 143 172 13 7.5% 27 132 159. - 7.5% - - 47 33 8 36 45.% 43 1 44 287 43 33 62 18.8% 237 31 268 46 55 461 57 12.3% 363 41 44 175 36 211 27 12.3% 157 27 184 364 5 414 51 12.3% 325 38 363 89 55 144 81 56.3% 36 27 63 1 1-29.1% 1-1 95 49 144 42 29.1% 68 34 12 24 15 39 11 29.1% 17 11 28 65 57 122 36 29.1% 47 39 86 2,229 2,474 4,73 61 13.% 1,924 2,169 4,93 Interzonal Tris (2) 13 1.7% 31 1.7% 3 1.7% -.% 3 3.8% 14 4.2% 19 4.1% 9 4.3% 17 4.1% 15 1.4%.% 3 2.1% 1 2.6% 2 1.6% 13 2.8% External Trips Pass-by New Tri )5 In Out Total Tri s (3) In Out Total 174 514 688 % 174 514 688 419 1,24 1,659 - % 419 1,24 1,659 26 13 156 % 26 13 156 - - % 41 41 4 1% 37 37 228 26 254 % 228 26 254 353 32 385 39 1% 318 28 346 153 22 175 18 1% 138 19 157 316 3 346 35 1% 284 27 311 27 21 48 18 36.6% 17 13 3 1 1 - % 1 1 66 33 99 5 5% 63 31 94 16 11 27 1 5% 15 11 26 46 38 84 42 5% 23 19 42 1,866 2,97 3,963 162 1,743 2,58 3.81 [COMBINED TOTALS I 3,1 I 2,841 I 5,941 I 736112.4%1 2,732 I 2,4731 5,25! 26 I 4.4%1 2,62 I 2,343 @45J 283[ I 2,3841 2,2781 4,662[ Rate obtained from Palm Beah State College trip generation study by Kim ley-horn. See Appendix B. (1 J Soure: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 9th Edition, unless othe[\a/ise noted.!2) Internalization matries are inluded in Appendix B. 131 Soure: Palm Beah County ULOC Artile 13. [-Projet lnternalizaion: 16.8%1
Trip Gen +Internal 13-13 8-7-14 4546+2M+PC 8/13/214 Exhibit 2C PM Peak Hour Trip Generation West Side ITE Land Use Code Intensity Residential - SF 21 DUs Residential - MF Apts. 22 DUs Residt>ntial - MF Condos. 23 15 DUs Residential - 55+ Detahed 251 3 DUs Residential- 55+ Attahed 252 2 DUs General Offie 71 15, SF Researh & Devel. 76 425, SF Retail 82 35, SF Park 412 125 Ares Trip Generation Rate (1) ln(t) =.9ln(x)+.51 163/37).62 /DU 165/35) Ln(T) =.82Ln(x)+.32 167/33).27 /DU 161/391.25 /DU 154/461 1.49 /1 SF 117/831 Ln Ill =.83Ln!Xl+ 1.6 115/85) Ln Ill=.67ln 1Xl+3.31 148/521.9 /Are 161/391 Total Tri )5 Internal In Out Total Trips (2).. 48.4%.. 48.4% 56 28 84 42 48.4% 49 32 81 39 48.4% 27 23 5 24 48.4% 38 186 224 25 11.3% 66 372 438 49 11.3% 666 721 1,387 164 11.8% 7 4 11 1 1.% External Trips Interzonal In Out Total Tris (2)...%..% 27 15 42 18 21.4% 25 17 42 18 22.2% 14 12 26 11 22.% 32 167 199 27 12.1% 55 334 389 53 12.1% 578 645 1,223 29 2.9% 6 4 1 1 1.% External Trips Pass-by New TrillS In Out Total Tri s_i3) In Out Total... %. % 17 7 24 % 17 7 24 15 9 24. % 15 9 24 8 7 15 % 8 7 15 22 15 172 17 1% 2 135 155 36 3 336 34 1% 32 27 32 473 46 933 268 28.7% 337 328 665 5 4 9. % 5 4 9 TOTALS 99 1 366 2 275 344 15.1% 737 1 194 1,931 418 18.4% 576 937 1 513 319 434 76 1 194 I East Side ITE land Use Code Intensity Residential- SF (N,O,T,Ui 21 1,1 DUs Residential SF IF,M,P,Q,R,SI 21 2,436 DUs Residential MF Condos. 23 45 DUs Residential - MF Apts. 22. DUs Hotel 31 15 Rooms Community College 54* 3, Students General Offie 71 3, SF Researh & Devel. 76 175, SF Light Industrial 11 45, SF Retail 82 15, SF Park 412 67 Ares Community Center 495 7, SF Churh 56 7, SF Davare 565 1, SF TOTALS Trip Generation Rate (1) LniTI -.9Ln(x)+.51 (63/37) LniTI =.9Ln(x)+.51 (63/37) Ln(T) =.82Ln(xl+.32 (67/331.62 /DU 165/351.6 /Room (51/49).14 /Student 154/461 1.49/1 SF (17/83) Ln iti =.83Ln lxi+ 1.6 115/85).97 /1 SF 112/88) Ln Ill=.67Ln (X)+3.31 148/521.9 /Are (61/39) 2.74 /1 SF 149/511.55 /1 SF 148/52) 12.34 /1 SF 147/53) Total TrillS Internal In Out Total Trips (2) 53 312 842 135 16.% 1,172 688 1,86 298 16.% 138 68 26 33 16.%. 16.% 46 44 9 39 43.3% 227 193 42 116 27.6% 76 371 447 69 15.4% 32 178 21 32 15.4% 52 385 437 67 15.4% 377 49 786 299 38.% 4 2 6 2 31.9% 94 98 192 61 31.9% 19 2 39 12 31.9% 58 65 123 39 31.9% 2,825 2,833 5,658 1,22 21.2% External Trips Interzonal In Out Total Trips (2) 447 26 77 77 9.1% 988 574 1,562 171 9.2% 116 57 173 19 9.2%..% 22 29 51 12 13.3% 166 138 34 37 8.8% 49 329 378 18 4.% 21 157 178 1 4.8% 33 337 37 18 4.1% 264 223 487 52 6.6% 3 1 4.% 63 68 131 2 1.% 13 14 27 1 2.6% 39 45 84 1.8% 2,224 2,232 4,456 418 7.4% External Trips Pass-by New Trips In Out Total Tri s (3) In Out Total 392 238 63 % 392 238 63 867 524 1,391 % 867 524 1,391 13 51 154 % 13 51 154.. %. 16 23 39 4 1% 14 21 35 146 121 267. % 146 121 267 45 315 36 36 1% 41 283 324 17 151 168 17 1% 15 136 151 29 323 352 35 1% 26 291 317 236 199 435 159 36.6% 15 126 276 3 1 4 % 3 1 4 61 68 129 6 5% 58 65 123 13 13 26 1 5% 12 13 25 39 44 83 42 5% 2 21 41 1,967 2,71 4,38 3 1,847 1,891 3,738 I COMBINED TOTALS I 3,734 I 4,199 I 7,933 I 1,546 119.5%1 2,961 I 3,4261 6,387 I. 836j 1.5%1 2,543 I :3;8[.5,551 I 619 I I 2,281 I 2,651 I 4,93f] Rate obtained from Palm Beah State College trip generation study by Kim ley-horn. See Appendix B. (1) Soure: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 9th Edition, unless otherwise noted. (2l Internalization matries are inluded in Appendix B. 131 Soure: Palm Beah County UUX: Artile 13. I Projet lnternaii.zaion:- -3.%1
------- 2% I -1 1% PCA BOULEVARD 3% 1% 5% 3% 3%.5% I 15.5% 16% 16% 2/o 22.5% 9% 5% 1% N.T.S. NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD 16%1 > > 1.5%.5% r 2% 1% TEMPLE BLVD 5 5% 4% 3% 2%1 23%.5%.5% 3% 2% ORANGE BOULEVARD 4.5%1 2.5% I % /o 2 \) Q 1% 3% 2%.5%1; < u u 13%.5% 11%.5% if 8% 6th STREET N 2.5% 6% 2% SYCAMORE DRIVE --:J 12% I 1.5% _PERSIMMON lo 4o/o 4 % 13 _ 5 % ----------'-.5% -Q5o/o 3.5% ORANGE GROVE BLVD 1m 3.5%.5% ROEBUCK I ROAD 1% I I o.5%l.5% Q 3% [ - 5 MILE RADIUS 3% 32%1 22% 19% 13.5% 1% 9.5% 9% I 6% 6% 6.5% ::.;'.5% 8 1% t.5 A 15.5% 11.5% 11.5% - 4%/ 1 5% ROEBUCK ROAD.5% z 1% 1% 1/o 9% 2% 6.5 5% OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD 1% /o -I BELVEDERE ROAD 5% SOUTHERN BOULEVARD 1.-- 2%1:;;,,,. P'' ::: 5 5 ' B/12/14 I I I 13-13 M_I_N_r_o_w-Es-r-;:, 1 I PROJEiRuTJoN IIPTi
om ===-=1:::: N.T.S. 27% 3% 8% 3%...... " < 4%1 w Vl SITE HIGH SCHOOL 13.5% 2% SYCAMORE DRIVE -' z 32%1 V'l "" 17% I I ATTACHMENT 38 l p-,r-l MINTO WEST PROJECT DISTRIBUTION DETAIL 8/12/14 13-13
Exhibit 3C Projet Traffi Assignment A>Sign 4546 DU> + 2M 13-13 8-13-14.xlsx 8/13/214 Page 1 of 1 AM Peak Hour 6th Street N 14th Avenue N Avoado Boulevard Coonut Boulevard Crestwood Boulevard
Exhibit 3C Projet Traffi Assignment Assign 4546 DU> + 2M 13-13 R- 13-14.xh R/13/214 Page 2 oi 1 AM Peak Hour Northlake Boulevard Okeehobee Boulevard
Exhibit 3C Projet Traffi Assignment 1\ssign 4546 DUs + :'M 13-13 8-13-14 xlsx 8/13/:'14 Page 3 oi 1 AM Peak Hour Orange Boulevard Orange Grove Boulevard I 44th Plae Persimmon Boulevard Royal Palm Beah Blvd
Exhibit 3C Projet Traffi Assignment A>Sign 4546 DUs +2M l:l-13 8-13-14.xlsx 8/13/214 Page 4 oi 1 AM Peak Hour Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd Southern Boulevard SR 7
Exhibit JC Projet Traffi Assignment Assign 4546 DUs +em 13-13 8-Ll-14.xlsx 8/13/214 Page 5 oi 1 AM Peak Hour (1 I Soure: 29 FOOT Quality I LOS Handbook. (21 Roadway link is not inluded on the Major Throughfare Identifiation Map. Loal Road Level of Servie analysis not reqtmed per PBC ULDC Artile 12. (3) Munipal roadway. Loal Road Level of Servie analysis not required per PBC ULDC Artile 12, Setion A.3.A.2. (41 One lane northbound and two lanes southbound. Servie volume is based on LOS C in "Transitioning Area" for this SIS faility. """---- -- " - -"""-''""""- Shaded roadway links are outside the radius of influene. Signifiane level is 5%.
Exhibit 3 Projet Traffi Assignment Assign 4S46 DU5 + 2M 1:\-13 8-13-14.xl>x 8/13/214 Page 6 oi 1 PM Peak Hour 6th Street N 14th Avenue N Avoado Boulevard Coonut Boulevard Crestwood Boulevard
Exhibit 3 Projet Traffi Assignment Ass1gn 4546 DUs + 2M n-on 8-13-14.xisx 8/13/214 Page 7 oi 1 PM Peak Hour Northlake Boulevard Okeehobee Boulevard
Exhibit 3D Projet Traffi Assignment Assign 4546 DUs +2M n-on 8-13-14.xlsx 8/13/214 PagP 8 oi 1 PM Peak Hour Orange Boulevard Orange Grove Boulevard I 44th Plae Persimmon Boulevard Royal Palm Beah Blvd
Exhibit 3D Projet Traffi Assignment A>Sign 4546 DU> + 2M 13-13 B-13-14.xl>X 8/13/214 PJge 9 of 1 PM Peak Hour Southern Boulevard SR 7
Exhibit 3 Projet Traffi Assignment A>Sign 4546 DU> + :>M 13-13 8-1:1-14 xl>x 8113/214 Page 1 oi 1 PM Peak Hour (1) Soure: 29 FOOT Quality I LOS Handbook. (2) Roadway link is not inluded on the Major Throughfare Identifiation Map. Loal Road Level of Servie analysis not required per PBC ULDC Artile 12. (3) Munipal roadway. Loal Road Level of Servie analysis not required per PBC ULDC Artile 12, Setion A.3.A.2. (4) One lane northbound and two lanes southbound. (5) Servie volume is based on LOS C in "Transitioning Area" for this SIS faility. [::_: 7 : :.:._, =- e ";""'":" = Shaded roadway links are outside the radius of influene. Signifiane level is 5%.
9/5/213 Growth 13-13 8-5-13.xlsx Exhibit 4 Historial Growth Roadway Binks Forest Drive Crestwood Blvd Okeehobee Bvd Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd Southern Blvd Northlake Boulevard SR 7 Royal Palm Beah Blvd Coonut Blvd 14th Avenue N Orange Boulevard Persimmon Blvd Link Greenview Shores Blvd to Southern Blvd Okeehobee Blvd to Royal Palm Beah Blvd Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd to 14th (E Rd) (1) 14th (E Road) to Crestwood Blvd Southern Blvd to Okeehobee Blvd Okeehobee Blvd to Syamore Dr (2) Syamore/Site to 6th Street 6th Street to Orange Blvd Orange Blvd to Northlake Blvd CR 88 to Lion Country Safari Lion Country Safari to Seminole Pratt Seminole Pratt to Binks Forest Dr Binks Forest Dr to Big Blue Tr Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd to 14th St 14th Street to Coonut Blvd Okeehobee Blvd to Orange Grove Blvd Persimmon Blvd to Northlake Blvd Okeehobee Blvd to RPB North City Limits RPB North City Limits to M Canal M Canal to Orange Blvd Persimmon Blvd to Orange Blvd Orange Blvd to Temple Blvd Orange Blvd to Northlake Blvd Seminole Pratt Whitne}'Rd to 14th Ave N 14th Ave N to Coonut Blvd Coonut Blvd to Royal Palm Beah Blvd 13th Ave N to Royal Palm Beah Blvd Areawide Peak Season Daily Traffi Volumes Growth 21 213 Rate 8,336 9,589 4.78% /Year 14,955 14,737 -.49% /Year 1,747 8,752-9.76% /Year 15,734 14,243-3.26% /Year 14,351 14,444.22% /Year 18,76 17,383-3.6% /Year 16,62 16,344 -.56% /Year 14,772 12,959-4.27% /Year 11,76 11,479 1.2% /Year 19,72 15,476-7.73% /Year 22,49 19,744-4.25% /Year 28,63 28,4 -.27% /Year 35,35 32,256-2.97% /Year 1,74 1,618 1.77% /Year NA 16,68 N/A /Year 13,661 16,657 6.83% /Year NA NA N/A /Year 22,123 21,996 -.19% /Year 16,753 14,621-4.44% /Year 15,825 16,3.99% /Year 2,791 2,859.81% /Year 1,796 11 '194 1.21% /Year NA NA N/A /Year 7,292 8,875 6.77% /Year 8,89 8,379 1.18% /Year 12,613 12,925.82% /Year 5,874 6,123 1.39% /Year 357,315 346,353-1.3% /Year (1) Utilized available 29-211 volumes. (2) Utilized available 28-21 volumes.
Exhibit SA Test 1 Intersetion Analysis (1) b,,..l! lllnl'"' Il 11-1111 f\ 1'>-14 xk fl/lh/114 235 AM Peak Hour 235 PM Psk Hour CritK:aJVol./ Gopadty Low!/ CritkaiVolJ Gopadty L... l/ Proposed Intersetion Delay (Se/Veh) LOS O.lay (Se/Veh) LOS Improvements St>mmo[(' Prall WhllnPy Ro.uJ 6th St N (l own Cen!Pr Pkwyl I SPmmole Pratt-Wh1tm y Rd 941 UNDER ll.'l4 UNDER l<'fl & R1ght Turn L:mp<, All Approah{ 6th S! N I Rovtl P.tlm BPah Blvd 1 JR3 NEAR 166 UNDER St2nalunlt<m Progrotmmf d lmprovpmpnt 6th St N I SR 7.1<1 UNDER.)52 NEAR 4l SR 7 ExtPn1n to North!dkP Blvd (2) NorthlakP Blvd/ Spmmo]( Ptdti-WhttnC'y Rd 186 NEAR 551 UNDER NorthlakP BouiPVdtd (2) NorthlakP Blvd I Comnut Blvd 1164 NEAR 134 UNDER 4l D Northlakt> Bou]pvard {2) SR 7 ExtensiOn to Northlake Blvd (2) Northl<k< Blvd I SR 7 1187 NEAR 1124 UNDER Northlak > Blvd NorthlakP Blvd I SR 71 (BPPhm HwyJ (3) jlnlf't<,ptton.15.9 D 43 4 D /lnter,etjon B 41. D 32 3 Grade Sep.uatf'd tnterrhangt: 8lD SR 71 NPW Connf'dor Ro.td wtth Stgnakrat!On Northlake Blvd I Jog Ro.td 51. D 124 NEAR Ok(>('holH P Blvd I Semmol<> Pratt Whttney Rd 911 UNDER 16 UNDER Ok(>('hobe< Blvd I Cr(>stwood Blvd 1143 UNDER 16 UNDER Ok(>('hobe( Blvd I Royal Palm Beah Blvd 1127 UNDER 1328 NEAR Okeehol)(><> Blvd I SR 7 OJ 47.9 D 54.8 D Ok('f'hob(>( Blvd I Sansbury\ Way 24.8 31.1 Okf'f'hob('{ Blvd I BPnotst Ftrms Rd 15.5 B 17.2 B Okeehobe( Blvd I Skees Rd 32.9 35.5 D Okwhol.Jpp Blvd I Jog Rd ()) 6.b D 58.6 D Orange Blvd I 5Pmm<P Pratt-Whitney Rei 777 UNDER 153 UNDER OrangP Blvd I Coonut Blvd 1284 NEAR 159 UNDER Orange Grow Blvd I Royal Pdlm Beah Blvd 785 UNDER 86 UNDER Orangt: GrovP Blvd I SR 7 S>8 UNDER (,?Q UNDER None Non< Non<> 6LD and Okeehohe( Blvd Grad<> SeparatPCI lnterhangt> None Non<' NonP Northbound Tnplt lefl'> NonP Coonut Blvd Non<' SR 7 Extenston to Northlake Blvd (2) 6LD Semmol< Pratt Whtlney Rotd Perstmmon Blvd I S<>mmoiP Pratt-Whtln(>y Rd 81l\ UNDER 113 UNDER LPft & Rtght Turn lanf's AU Approthe'> St_gntlll"alton, Westbound Dual LPfts SB Dual lpfts Pt rstmmon Blvd I Royal Palm Beth Blvd 114 UNDER 82 UNDER Perstmmon Blvd I SR 7 747 UNDER 844 UNDER 4LO SR 7 Ext<>nston to NorthltkP Blvd {2) SR 7 Ext<>nston to Northltkt Blvd (2J Roebuk Rei/ SR 7 128 UNDER 1133 UNDER Roebuk Exl<>nston (2) 6LD Soulh<'rn Blvd {2) SouthNn Blvd I SPmmoll' Prdt! Whttm y Rd 33. 27.3 Southbound T npip Lef 6LD Southern Blvd (2), EB Du.tllPfts {l) SouthNn Blvd I Btnks ForP'>I Dr.18.6 D 54.2 D SB Rtght Turn Lan<' 6LD SouthPrn Blvd (l) Sou!ht>rn Blvd I Btg Blu( T ra(.<' J(d\ D 42.2 D SouthPrn Blvd Northbound LPf! Turn Ltn(' -+- SouthPrn Blvd. Thml NB Thru ltnf SouthPTn Blvd I FoH''! Htll Blvd 5 7 D ')2.] D Northbounel Frf't:> Flow Rtght Turn Ldnf EB. WB and NB Tn >I( LPft Turn lam + SouthPrn Blvd SouthNn Blvd I Royal P.tlm B( dh Blvd 4.'/.fJ D NA NA T urnptkp/ Jog Rotd @ Northlak< Blvd 1.8 NA NA None (lt 5-Pt> Ap)Wnd!x t lor mtey>fll<>ll (...tpoinl} dlloll>rot'\ Soulht m 81\.-d B"'hnt Hwy,uxl ).!-'i dkjho P Blvd mtpn ftj<>il' Tf"qvm HCS.Uiollll'>t'' ht'f.dln" tllf'} dll' <Ill tho SIS'" dll" TRIP lund!'d (2 1 PnrolmfT"If'l"l tmprowmpnt I 11 R!'l!'r I<> Apptoi>dlx E lot tum ldnt inlpttivt'nwnt 1<>1 C<l!HI!"rh>l R<wd 14< Ari<>plf"Ci CRALLS LOS"!SIMI <llla..tl Vllllllll' IS1 Adoptt'd CRALLS los" ;,4 S '<'<Jwh dt>kn
Exhibit 58 Intersetion Geometry Summary b..-,8 \n!pr'-t'rtl m G )mf trv Summ<H) 1 i.()l \ H-11>-14.xlsx H/lf>Fl14 Pnw 1 of 4 Intersetion 6th St N IT own Center Pkwyl I Seminole Pratt-Whitney Rd 6th St N I Royal Palm Beah Blvd Existing + + + + + + + + Programmed N/A Jr t ------. t - lil Proposed (1) Jlll - SIGNAL t ------. N/A t llll Improvement Notes NO ADDITIONAL COSTS Proposed 6 Ianing of Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road through site; therefore, no additional right-of-way or improvement osts. 6th St N I SR 7 N/A N/A Northlake Blvd I Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd Northlake Blvd I Coonut Blvd 1 L L r I - ---- [l n ----. LOW - [l II - --.. L 1 L i I - - - n -----. LOW [l N/A N/A Northlake Blvd I SR 7 Northlake Blvd I SR 71 (Beeline Hwyl ----+ Northlake Blvd I jog Rd N/A lll L --.-- --- --+ ----. -llrn -- -lll _t_ - t ----+ --+ llhi -----. -.----.---- -- -!Ill ------. N/A N/A -.----.-- - llll --.. GRADE SEPARATED INTERCHANGE (See Appendix E) N/A NO ADDITIONAL COSTS Proposed 8 Ianing of Northlake Boulevard would inlude proposed eastbound improvement and additional right-of-way is being required for link that will over intersetion improvement. ADDITIONAL COSTS INCLUDED SEPARATELY AS PROPORTIONATE SHARE FOR INTERSECTION SEE EXHIBIT 7E
Exhibit 58 Intersetion Geometry Summary b. 'ib lntpr<.t rtl(ln Gl'(lffil'!l) StJmmrtry 1 1-l.l H-lh-14.xl9: U/HJ/114 Prl' 1. of 4 Intersetion Existing JllLL L_ - L j ------.- lnr Okeehobee Blvd I Seminole.-- Pratt-Whitney Rd -llll -.-- lnr L_ Okeehobee Blvd I Crestwood.-- Blvd j Okeehobee Blvd I Royal Palm Beah Blvd Okeehobee Blvd I SR 7 Okeehobee Blvd I Sansbury's Way - ------. JlLL t= j j -In I ------. u b lllll _T t illh - il --.-- ----. t lil - L_ -+-- Jr _t Okeehobee Blvd I Benoist.-- Farms Rd Okeehobee Blvd I Skees Rd ----. lil -+-- J lll.-- 't - l i- - -----. Pr21'ammed Proposed (1) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A JlLL j j llll ------. GRADE SEPARATED INTERCHANGE (See Appendix E) N/A N/A N/A Improvement Notes NO ADDITIONAL COSTS Proposed 8 Ianing of Okeehobee Boulevard would inlude proposed improvement and additional right-of-way is being required for link that will over intersetion improvement. ADDITIONAL COSTS INCLUDED SEPARATELY IN PROPORTIONATE SHARE FOR INTERSECTION SEE EXHIBIT 7E
Exhibit 58 Intersetion Geometry Summary E>. 'ib lnt"r"!um Gt'(lnlP\rY Summ<lr) 1"\-{ll lll-11>-14.xl B/1(,/114 Paw 1 of 4 Intersetion Okeehobee Blvd I jog Rd Orange Blvd I Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd : b- JlllLL t llilll ------.. ll L r r r Pammed N/A N/A Proposed (1) :!-- JlllLL tt lllrnr ------.. N/A Improvement Notes ADDITIONAL COSTS INCLUDED SEPARATELY IN PROPORTIONATE SHARE FOR INTERSECTION SEE EXHIBIT 7E Orange Blvd I Coonut Blvd t -.---- ++ N/A Jll ADDITIONAL COSTS INCLUDED SEPARATELY IN PROPORTIONATE SHARE FOR ROADWAY LINK SEE EXHIBIT 7D Orange Grove Blvd I Royal Palm Beah Blvd 11L N/A N/A Orange Grove Blvd I SR 7 Persimmon Blvd I Seminole Pratt-Whitney Rd -----{ l i ll N/A N/A SIGNAL J llll - - j lrnr NO ADDITIONAL COSTS Proposed 6 Ianing of Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road through site, therefore no additional right-of-way or improvement osts. Persimmon Blvd I Royal Palm Beah Blvd ill - j - llr N/A - lrr illl t - j ADDITIONAL COSTS INCLUDED SEPARATELY IN. PROPORTIONATE SHARE FOR INTERSECTION SEE EXHIBIT 7E Persimmon Blvd I SR 7 l il lll N/A
Exhibit 58 Intersetion Geometry Summary h 'ib lnlt>r 1um G!'nmt'll) 5tlmmary 1 1-1.1!l-ll>-14.xi"X B/lto/.!14 Pn 4 of 4 Intersetion Roebuk Rd I SR 7 Existing N/A - L_ J LLI L_ Southern Blvd I Seminole Pratt- -.----- Whitney Rd J J ----+ ----+ Southern Blvd I Binks Forest Dr Southern Blvd I Big Blue Trae Southern Blvd I Forest Hill Blvd L_ + -.----- t ----+ ------. lil L_ + - -.---.----- 111 _t ----+ -----. Jll1Ll F ----+ + ----+ ----+ llhii -----. - J tl L_ Southern Blvd I Royal Palm.--- Beah Blvd Turn pike I Jog Road Entrane (south of Northlake Blvd) t t ----+ ----+ ---r lr llll.----- L_.----- n1 Programmed Pro_>_osed ( 1 ) L_ 11 L.--- L_.--- 111 N/A 1------ f- JLLI JLLL -.--- j j j j -- - - - J-- L_ 1l - Jll -.----- }-- -+ -+ - lil - lil ---. -----. L_ J il - il - F t t 111 ----+ - - lill - - ---. -----. N/A N/A N/A JlllLL tt t -- ll111 ---. L_ Jtl -.----- _tt ----+ l -- ---.. N/A Improvement Notes ADDITIONAL COSTS INCLUDED SEPARATELY IN PROPORTIONATE SHARE FOR INTERSECTION SEE EXHIBIT 7E NO ADDITIONAL COSTS Southbound improvement being ompleted by adjaent developers. ADDITIONAL COSTS FOR NB IMP INCLUDED SEPARATELY IN PROPORTIONATE SHARE FOR ROADWAY LINK SEE EXHIBIT 7D NO ADDITIONAl COSTS FOR E/W IMP Proposed 8 Ianing of Southern Boulevard would inlude proposed improvement and existing right-of-way is adequate. ADDITIONAL COSTS INCLUDED SEPARATELY IN PROPORTIONATE SHARE FOR INTERSECTION SEE EXHIBIT 7E NO ADDITIONAL COSTS Proposed 8 + Ianing of Southern Boulevard would inlude proposed improvement and additional right-of-way is being required for link that will over intersetion improvement. 11) Inludes imporvements required to meet adopted level of servie. Palm Beah County has requested additional dual left turn lane improvements that are not required tom eet adopted level of servie. See Exhibit SC
Ex 5C Intersetion Dual Lefts 13-13 8-15-14 8/15/214 Page 1 of 1 Exhibit 5C Intersetions - Requested Dual Left Turn Lanes (1) Left Turn Intersetion Movement 235 Volume 6th Street & SR 7 Westbound 33 Northlake Blvd & Jog Rd Westbound 392 Southbound 278 Okeehobee Blvd & Benoist Farms Rd Westbound 259 Orange Blvd & Seminole Pratt- Whitney Rd Westbound 495 Orange Blvd & Coonut Eastbound 281 Southbound 328 Orange Grove Blvd & SR 7 Northbound 351 Persimmon Blvd & SR 7 Northbound 69 Roebuk Rd & SR 7 Southbound 415 Northbound 398 Southern Blvd & Binks Forest Dr Southbound 263 (1) Improvements not needed for intersetion operation at adopted standards.
Exhibit 6A Test 1 Link Analysis -AM Peak Hour- 4546 Dus + 2M w/o Orange Grove TP<:I 1 4')46 DUo:; + 2M w-o Ornngt Grow 11-1 A-ll-14 )(I<;}( R/11/214 Pr!gf' 1 of R 1,336 2,94 AM PEAK HOUR Existing Committed Dev. Analysis (2) SR 7 Roebuk Total Servie Roadway Link Lanes Dir (213) (1) TPS.5% Growth Total Div. (3) Div.(3) Bkgd. Volume Seminole Pratt-Whitney Rd to 14th Ave (4) 2L EB 13-2 2 76 91 88 2L WB 13 2 2 19 34 88 14th Ave to Avoado Blvd (4) 2L EB 13 2 2 76 91 88 2L WB 13 2 2 19 34 88 6th Street North Avoado Blvd to Coonut Blvd (4) 2L EB 13 2 2 76 91 88 2L WB 13 2 2 19 34 88 Coonut Blvd to Royal Palm Beah Blvd 141 2L EB 13 2 2 76 91 88 2L WB 13 2 2 19 34 88 Royal Palm Beah Blvd to SR 7 (4) 2L EB 6 1 1 152 159 88 2L WB 9 1 1 38 48 88 Orar1ge Grove Blvd to Persimmon Blvd 2L NB 181 21 21 22 88 2L SB 73 8 8 81 88 Persimmon Blvd to 6th St 2L NB 181 21 21 22 88 2L SB 73 8 8 81 88 Coonut Blvd 6th St to Orar1ge Blvd 2L NB 181 114 21 135 316 88 2L SB 73 4 8 48 121 88 Orang_e Blvd to Temple Blvd 2L NB 741 363 86 449 (32) 87 88 2L SB 351 99 41 14 (8) 411 88 Temple Blvd to Northlake Blvd 2L NB 1,18 32 118 438 (32) 1,136 88 2L SB 231 68 27 95 (8) 246 88 Turnpike Entrane to Okeehobee Blvd 6LD NB 1,353 167 157 324 1,677 2,68 Jog Road 6LD SB 1,44 119 121 24 1,284 2,68 Turn_r>ike Entrane to Northlake Blvd (5) NB 564 44 44 68 1,77 SB 998-78 78 1,76 1,77 Sem. Pratt Whitney Rd to Hall Blvd (6) EB 814 31 94 395 (152) 1,57 1,96 WB 235 89 27 116 (38) 313 1,96 Hall Blvd to 14th Ave (6) EB 814 31 94 395 (152) 1,57 1,96 WB 235 89 27 116 (38) 313 1,96 14th Ave to Coonut Blvd 161 EB 1,345 44 156 56 (152) 1,753 1,96 WB 311 139 36 175 (38) 448 1,96 Coonut Blvd to Ibis Blvd EB 2,359 819 274 1,93 (472) 2,98 1,96 WB 459 153 53 26 (118) 547 1,96 Northlake Boulevard Ibis Blvd to SR 7 EB 2,541 819 295 1,114 (472) 3,183 1,96 WB 615 153 71 224 (118) 721 1,96 SR 7 to Beeline Hwy EB 2,541 842 295 1,137 3,678 3,32 WB 615 132 71 23 818 3,32 Beeline Hwy to Ryder Cup Blvd 6LD EB 1,426 1 165 166 1,592 2,94 6LD WB 491 33 57 387 878 2,94 Ryder Cup Blvd to Steeplehase Dr. 6LD EB 1,846 81 214 295 2,141 2,68 6LD WB 72 84 81 165 867 2,68 Steeplehase Dr. to Military Trail 6LD EB 2,316 81 269 35 2,666 2,94 6LD -- WB_ - 1,12_2_ - 12Q_ L_ L L_ -- --- -- -- Pr<>J>. lmf rovements Meets Total Meets Servie Std? Projet (235) Std? Lanes Volume Yes 41 51 Yes Yes 429 463 Yes Yes 364 455 Yes Yes 381 415 Yes Yes 296 387 Yes Yes 31 343 Yes Yes 251 341 Yes Yes 262 296 Yes Yes 182 341 Yes Yes 191 239 Yes Yes 83 285 Yes Yes 8 161 Yes Yes 11 213 Yes I Yes 12 93 Yes Yes 46 362 Yes Yes 48 169 Yes Yes 13 972 NO 196 Yes 17 518 Yes NO 114 1,25 NO 196 Yes 119 365 Yes Yes 143 1,82 Yes Yes 137 1,421 Yes Yes 95 73 Yes Yes 91 1,167 Yes Yes 353 1,41 Yes Yes 37 683 Yes Yes 364 1,422 Yes Yes 381 695 Yes Yes 364 2,117 NO 6LD 294 Yes 381 83 Yes NO 456 3,435 NO 394 Yes 477 1,24 Yes NO 433 3,616 NO 394 Yes 453 1,174 Yes NO 513 4,19 NO 6LD 498 Yes 536 1,355 Yes Yes 342 1,934 Yes Yes 358 1,236 Yes Yes 228 2,369 Yes Yes 238 1,16 Yes Yes 25 2,871 Yes Yes 215 1,551 Yes
TPt 1 4:i4fl ou +2M w-o OrrlnR!' GrovP 1J-OU 11-11-14 xl;x Exhibit 6A Test 1 Link Analysis- AM Peak Hour- 4546 Dus +2M w/o Orange Grove R/1 V214 Pnw' lof R Existing Roadway link Lanes Dir (213) (1) Committed Dev. Analysis (2) TPS.5% Growth Total AM PEAK HOUR SR 7 Roebuk Total Servie Div.(3) Div. (3) Bkgd. Volume Prop. Improvements Meets Total Meets Servie Std! Projet (235) Std! Lanes Volume Seminole Pratt Whitnet Rd to B Road (71 2L EB 517 1 66 67 584 1,14 Yes 228 812 Yes 2L WB 353 1 45 46 399 1,14 Yes 238 637 Yes B Road to 14th Ave (E Road) (71 2L EB 517 1 66 67 584 1,14 Yes 216 8 Yes 2L WB 353 14th Ave (E Road) to Folsom Rd 2L EB 766 2L WB 457 1 45 46 34 89 123 35 53 88 399 1,14 889 88 545 88 Yes 226 625 Yes NO 25 1,94 NO 196 Yes 215 76 Yes Folsom Road to Crestwood Blvd EB 766 32 89 121 887 1,77 Yes 194 1,8 Yes OkePhobee Blvd WB 457 Crestwood Blvd to Royal Palm Beah Blvd EB 1,438 WB 825 Royal Palm Beah Blvd to Wildat Way 6LD EB 2,391 38 53 91 59 167 226 71 96 167 17 277 447 548 1,77 1,664 1,77 992 1,77 (32) 2,518 2,68 Yes 23 751 Yes Yes 182 1,846 NO 6LD 268 Yes 191 1,182 Yes Yes 182 2,71 NO BLD 359 6LD WB 99 125 115 24 (8) 1,15 2,68 Yes 191 1,341 Yes SR 7 to Sansbury's Way BLD EB 2,675 BLD WB 1,35 315 31 625 15 12 27 (829) 2,471 3,94 (481 897 3,94 Yes 38 2,779 Yes Yes 322 1,219 Yes Sansbury's Way to Benoist Farms Rd BLD EB 3,26 BLD WB 1,12 Benoist Farms Rd to Skees Rd BLD EB 2,889 BLD WB 1,32 Skees Rd to Jog Rd BLD EB 2,966 BLD WB 1,345 374 351 725 184 13 314 39 335 725 26 151 411 266 344 61 258 156 414 (8291 2,922 3,59 (48) 1,26 3,59 (829) 2,785 3,59 (48) 1,35 3,59 (8291 2,747 3,59 (48) 1,351 3,59 Yes 285 3,27 Yes Yes 298 1,324 Yes Yes 273 3,58 Yes Yes 286 1,591 Yes Yes 273 3,2 Yes Yes 286 1,637 Yes Sem. Pratt Whitn Rd to Hall Blvd 2L EB 331 58 38 96 76 53 88 Yes 68 572 Yes 2L WB 244 51 28 79 19 342 88 Yes 72 414 Yes Hall Blvd to 14th Ave 2L EB 331 35 38 73 76 48 88 Yes 46 526 Yes Orange Blvd 2L WB 244 14th Ave to Avoado Blvd 2L EB 49 34 28 62 61 57 118 19 325 88 76 684 88 Yes 48 3 73 Yes Yes 46 729 Yes 2L WB 185 2 21 41 19 245 88 Yes 48 293 Yes Avoado Blvd to Coonut Blvd 2L EB 49 61 57 118 76 684 88 Yes 57 741 Yes I 2L WB 185 2 21 41 19 245 88 Yes 6 35 Yes 14th Ave to Avoado Blvd (4) 2L EB 172 2L WB 51 Avoado Blvd to Coonut Blvd(4 I 2L EB 172 25 25-7 7 25 25 197 88 58 88 197 88 Yes 11 28 Yes Yes 12 7 Yes Yes 11 28 Yes I Orange Crave Blvd I 44th 2L WB 51 7 7 58 88 Yes 12 7 Yes Plae Coonut Blvd to Royal Palm Beah Blvd (4) 2L EB 282 36 36 318 88 Yes 8 398 Yes 2L WB 54 7 7 61 88 Yes 83 144 Yes Royal Palm Beah Blvd to SR 7 (4) 2L EB 35 39 39 344 88 Yes 91 435 Yes 2L WB 63 8 8 71 88 Yes 95 166 Yes
Exhibit 6A TP<;I 1 4')46 DUo; + 2M w-n Oronw' GrnvP 1 -fll' 11-1,_ 14 xl"x n/11/2 14 Ptt' \ o(/1 Test 1 Link Analysis- AM Peak Hour- 4546 Dus + 2M w/o Orange Grove Existing Roadway Link Lanes Dir (213) (1) Committed Dev. Analysis (2) TPS.5% Growth Total AM PEAK HOUR SR 7 Roebuk Total Servie Div.(3) Div. (3) Bkgd. Volume Prop. lmrovements Meets Total Meets Servie Std! Projet (235) Std! Lanes Volume 14Dth Ave to Avoado Blvd 14) 2L EB 263 38 38 31 88 Yes 376 677 Yes 2L WB 143 21 21 164 88 Yes 393 557 Yes Avoado Blvd to Coonut Blvd 14) 2L EB 263 38 38 31 88 Yes 364 665 Yes Persimmon Blvd 2L WB 143 Coonut Blvd to Royal Palm Beah Blvd 14) 2L EB 441 21 21 54 54 164 88 495 88 Yes 381 545 Yes Yes 273 768 Yes 2L WB 113 5 14 19 132 88 Yes 286 418 Yes Royal Palm Beah Blvd to SR 7 2L EB 455 6 53 59 514 88 Yes 239 753 Yes 2L WB 162 15 19 34 196 88 Yes 25 446 Yes RPB North City Limits to Orange Grove Blvd NB 499 58 58 132) 237 1,96 Yes 83 32 Yes SB 585 21 68 89 18) 594 1,96 Yes 8 674 Yes Orange Grove Blvd to Persimmon Blvd NB 499 58 58 132) 237 1,96 Yes 95 332 Yes Royal Palm Beah Blvd SB 585 Persimmon Blvd to 6th Street N 2L NB 499 21 68 89 15 58 73 18) 594 1,96 132) 252 88 Yes 91 685 Yes Yes 57 39 Yes 2L SB 585 21 68 89 18) 594 88 Yes 6 653 Yes 6th Street N to Orange Blvd 2L NB 538 7 62 69 (31) 36 88 Yes 11 318 Yes 2L SB 9 Southern Blvd to Okeehobee Blvd NB 37 SB 844 21 14 125 25 43 248 149 98 247 14) 1,21 88 618 1,96 1,91 1,96 NO 12 1,33 NO 196 Yes 524 1 '142 Yes Yes 51 1,592 Yes Okeehobee Blvd to Syamore/Site 18) NB 624 SB 786 Syamore/Site to Persimmon Blvd NB 878 SB 728 Persimmon Blvd to 6th St N 11 ) 2L NB 878 Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd 2L SB 728 6th St N to Orange Blvd NB 55 SB 597 3 72 12 26 91 117 21 12 123 19 84 13 32 12 134 33 84 117 21 64 85 19 69 88 726 1,96 93 1,96 1,1 1,96 831 1,96 1,12 81 845 81 176) 559 1,96 119) 666 1,96 Yes 787 1,513 Yes Yes 752 1,655 Yes Yes 96 1,97 Yes Yes 866 1,697 Yes NO 729 1,741 NO 177 NO 763 1,68 NO 177 Yes 615 1 '174 Yes Yes 644 1,31 Yes Orange Blvd to Temple Blvd 16) NB 487 SB 56 Temple Blvd to Northlake Blvd 16) NB 487 14 56 7 16 59 75 14 56 7 11 52) 45 1,96 138) 543 1,96 11 52) 45 1,96 Yes 456 861 Yes Yes 477 1,19 Yes Yes 364 77 Yes SB 56 Northlake Blvd to North 14) 2L SB 68 CR 88 to Lion Country_ Safari EB 445 WB 889 Lion Country Safari to Seminole Pratt 16) 6LD EB 625 6LD WB 915 Seminole Pratt to Binks Forest Dr 16) 6LD EB 1,195 16 59 75 24 8 32 1,2 52 1,54 393 13 496 991 72 1,63 389 16 495 884 139 1,23 138) 543 1,96 1 1,14 1,499 2,42 1,385 2,42 1,688 2,94 1,41 2,94 2,218 2,94 Yes 381 924 Yes Yes 12 112 Yes Yes 6 1,558 Yes Yes 57 1,442 Yes Yes 72 1,76 Yes Yes 68 1,478 Yes Yes 433 2,65 Yes Southern Boulevard 6LD WB 1,95 Sinks Forest Dr to Big Blue Tr 16) 6LD EB 1,563 6LD WB 1,193 397 127 524 748 181 929 458 138 596 1,619 2,94 2,492 2,94 1,789 2,94 Yes 453 2,72 Yes Yes 387 2,88 Yes Yes 45 2,195 Yes Big_ Blue Trae to Palms West P 16) 6LD EB 1,997 6LD WB 1,619 Palms West Pkwy to Forest Hill Blvd 6LD EB 1,997 623 232 855 387 188 575 612 232 844 2,852 2,68 2,194 2,68 2,841 2,68 NO 353 3,25 NO 8L[) 359 i Yes 37 2,563 Yes NO 353 3,194 NO 359 -- -- ---- --- --- - WB 1,619 364 188 552 2,171 2,68 Yes 37 2,54 Yes I
Exhibit 6A Test 1 Link Analysis- AM Peak Hour- 4546 Ous + 2M w/o Orange Grove TP'".Il 4S4fJ DUe;+ 2M w-n Orn.':P Crow 1 Hll 11-1 '-14 xl<;x R/1 V214 Pi!gP 4 of R Roadway Link Forest Hill Blvd to Cypress Head Cypress Head to Royal Palm Beah Blvd Royal Palm Beah Blvd to SR 7 Southern Boulevard SR 7 to Sansbury's Wil'j_ Sansbury's Way to Benoist Farms Rd Benoist Farms Rd to Pike Rd!TP Belvedere Rd to Okeehobee Blvd Okeehobee Blvd to Roebuk Rd (6) Roebuk Rd to Orange Grove Blvd (6) SR 7 Orange Grove Blvd to Persimmon Blvd (6) Persimmon Blvd to 6th Street N (6) 6th Street N to Northlake Blvd (6) Northlake Blvd to je>g_ Rd SR 71 I Beeline Highway 1 urn pike lake Worth Rd to Southern Blvd (9) Lanes 6LD 6LD 6LD 6LD Dir EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB 6LD NB 6LD 58 NB 58 NB 58 NB 58 NB SB NB 58 EB WB 4LX NB Existing Committed Dev. Analysis (2) (213) (1) TPS o.s')(, Growth Total 2,895 496 336 832 1,549 253 18 433 2,872 455 333 788 1,495 27 173 443 3,243 444 376 82 1,856 129 215 344 3,647 294 423 717 1,89 16 219 379 3,528 35 49 444 2,36 117 236 353 3,528 1 49 419 2,36 48 236 284 846 222 98 32 1,666 231 193 424 263 19 31 5 1,31 47 152 199 263 29 31 6 1,31 41 152 193 263 29 31 6 1,31 41 152 193 1,749 886 23 1,89 94 178 15 283 3,228 392 392 - AM PEAK HOUR SR 7 Roebuk Total Div.(3) Div. (3) Bkgd. 32 451 8 31 32 8 32 8 32 8 472 118 3,727 1,982 3,66 1,938 4,63 2,2 4,364 2,269 3,972 2,389 3,947 2,32 1,166 2,9 1,84 1,62 643 1,583 643 1,583 32 8 472 118 2,838 1,187 3,62 Servie Volume 2,94 2,94 2,94 2,94 3,94 3,94 3,94 3,94 3,94 3,94 3,59 3,59 2,68 2,68 1,96 1,96 3,32 3,32 3,32 3,32 3,32 3,32 3,32 3,32 1,96 1,96 3,72 ProJ1. Improvements Meets Total Meets Servie Std! Projet (235) Std! Lanes Volume NO 262 3,989 NO + 494 Yes 274 2,256 Yes NO 262 3,922 NO 394 Yes 274 2,213 Yes NO 262 4,325 NO + 494 Yes 274 2,474 Yes NO 228 4,592 NO + 494 Yes 238 2,58 Yes NO 25 4,177 NO + 494 Yes 215 2,64 Yes NO 25 4,152 NO + 45 Yes 215 2,535 Yes Yes 155 1,321 Yes Yes 148 2,238 Yes Yes 322 1,45 Yes Yes 38 1,927 Yes Yes 45 1,48 Yes Yes 387 1,97 Yes Yes 322 964 Yes Yes 38 1,89 Yes Yes 143 463 Yes Yes 137 217 Yes Yes 91 563 Yes Yes 95 213 Yes NO 13 2,94 NO 6LD 294 Yes 13 1,289 Yes Yes 191 3,811 N(11) 111 Count data from Palm Beah County. See Appendix A. 121 Commi«ed development data from County TPS Database. See Appendix D. (3) Diversion analysis inluded in Appendix F. (4) link ount based on mtersedion ount data from 28-213. See Appendix A. lsi Utilizes 22 traffi volume projetion from Jog Road Extension Intersetion Study by PTC, PTC#9-68, dated 9/23/1. See Appendix A. 161 Inludes programmed improvement to 4 lanes (Northlake Blvd in 217, SR 7 in 216, 217 & 218, Seminole Pran-Whitney Rd in 2141 and 6 lanes Southern Blvd in 218. 171 Utrhzed 211 ount. (8) Utili1ed average of adjaent ounts. 191 Utili1ed f DOT 212 ount. (1) Utiliu d Cli!ss II volume for buildout year. (11) Any lrip5 a55igned to a toll-finaned faility shall be eliminated from the proportionate share analysis.
TPt 1 4.')4() DU<i +2M w-o OrrngP Crow 11-1 J 11-1 \-14.xl<.x Exhibit 68 Test 1 link Analysis- PM Peak Hour- 4546 DUs +2M w/o Orange Grove N1 l/114 Pr.g.' 'i nf II Existing Roadway Link Lanes Dir (213) (1) Committed Dev. Analysis (2) TPS.5% Growth Total PM PEAK HOUR SR 7 Roebuk Total Servie Div. (3) Div.(3) Bkgd. Volume ProJ>, lm_jl rovements Meets Total Meets Servie Std? Projet (235) Std? Lanes Volume Seminole Pratt-Whitney Rd to 14th Ave (41 2L EB 6 1 1 29 36 88 Yes 477 513 Yes 2L WB 2 2 2 67 89 88 Yes 411 5oo Yes 14th Ave to Avoado Blvd (4 I 2L EB 6 1 1 29 36 88 Yes 424 46 Yes 2L WB 2 2 2 67 89 88 Yes 365 454 Yes 6th Street North Avoado Blvd to Coonut Blvd 141 2L EB 6 2L WB 2 1 1 2 2 29 36 88 67 89 88 Yes 345 38 Yes Yes 297 386 Yes Coonut Blvd to Royal Palm Beah Blvd (4) 2L EB 6 1 1 29 36 88 Yes 292 327 Yes 2L WB 2 2 2 67 89 88 Yes 251 34 Yes Royal Palm Beah Blvd to SR 7 (4) 2L EB 6 1 1 57 64 88 Yes 212 276 Yes 2L WB 1 Orange Grove Blvd to Persimmon Blvd 2L NB 18 2L SB 173 Persimmon Blvd to 6th St 2L NB 18 2L SB 173 1 1-13 13 2 2-13 13 2 2 133 144 88 121 88 193 88 121 88 193 88 Yes 182 327 Yes Yes 8 2 Yes Yes 93 286 Yes Yes 13 134 Yes Yes 11 24 Yes Coonut Blvd 6th St to Orange Blvd 2L NB 18 2L 58 173 Orange Blvd to Temple Blvd 2L NB 435 2L 58 639 75 13 88 154 2 174 181 5 231 456 74 53 196 88 347 88 (12) 546 88 (28) 889 88 Yes 53 249 Yes Yes 46 393 Yes Yes 119 666 Yes NO 13 992 NO 196 Temple Blvd to Northlake Blvd 2L NB 325 2L 58 82 114 38 152 38 95 475 (12) 357 88 (28) 1,15 88 Yes 133 489 Yes NO 114 1 '129 NO 196 Turn pike Entrane to Okeehobee Blvd 6LD NB 1,198 156 139 295 1,493 2,68 Yes 137 1,63 Yes Jog Road 6LD SB 1,154 Tur()_()ike Entrane to Northlake Blvd (5) NB 1,156 27 14 347 9 9 1,51 2,68 1,246 1,77 Yes 159 1,66 Yes Yes 91 1,337 Yes 58 1,18 92 92 1,272 1,77 Yes 16 1,378 Yes Sem. Pratt Whitney Rd to Hall Blvd (6) EB 294 154 34 188 (57) 425 1,96 Yes 411 836 Yes WB 62 38 72 452 (133) 939 1,96 Yes 354 1,292 Yes Hall Blvd to 14th Ave (6) EB 294 154 34 188 (57) 425 1,96 Yes 424 849 Yes WB 62 14th Ave to Coonut Blvd (6) EB 378 WB 1,181 Coonut Blvd to Ibis Blvd EB 669 WB 2,34 38 72 452 255 44 299 542 137 679 273 78 351 961 236 1,197 (133) 939 1,96 (57) 62 1,96 (133) 1,727 1,96 (177) 843 1,96 (413) 2,818 1,96 Yes 365 1,34 Yes Yes 424 1,44 Yes Yes 365 2,92 NO 6LD 294 Yes 53 1,373 Yes NO 456 3,274 NO 3q4 Northlake Boulevard ibis Blvd to SR 7 EB 82 WB 2,117 273 95 368 961 246 1,27 (177) 1,11 1,96 (413) 2,911 1,96 Yes 54 1,515 Yes NO 433 3,344 NO RLD 394 SR 7 to Beeline H."')' EB 82 WB 2,117 236 95 331 951 246 1,197 1 '1 51 3,32 3,314 3,32 Yes 596 1,748 Yes Yes 513 3,827 NO 6LD 498 Beeline Hwy to Ryder Cup Blvd 6LD EB 69 6LD WB 1,299 Ryder Cup Blvd to Steeplehase Dr. 6LD EB 1,34 6LD WB 1,682 362 8 442 95 151 246 99 12 219 17 195 32 1 '132 2,94 1,545 2,94 1,253 2,68 1,984 2,68 Yes 398 1,53 Yes Yes 342 1,887 Yes Yes 265 1,518 Yes I Yes 228 2,212 Yes Steeplehase Dr. to Military Trail 6LD EB 1,467 6LD WB 2,17 136 17 36 157 252 49 1,773 2,94 2,579 2,94 Yes 239 2,12 Yes I Yes 25 2,784 Yes I
Exhibit 68 Test 1 Link Analysis- PM Peak Hour- 4546 DUs +2M w/o Orange Grove T""' 1 4.14(, OU<. +1M w-o Or.mw' Crow 1 -OU fl-1-14.xl<>x "11 \/214 PrlgP (,of(\ Existing Roadway Link Lanes Dir (213) (1) Committed Dev. Analysis (2) TPS.5% Growth Total PM PEAK HOUR SR 7 Roebuk Total Servie Div. (3) Div. (3) Bkgd. Volume ProJI. lm_: rovements Meets Total Meets Servie Stdf Projet (235) Stdf Lanes Volume Okeehobee Blvd Orange Boulevard Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd to B Road 181 2L EB 29 2L WB 52 B Road to 14th Ave IE Road) 181 2L EB 29 2L WB 52 14th Ave IE Road) to Folsom Rd 2L EB 52 2L WB 73 Folsom Road to Crestwood Blvd EB 52 WB 73 Crestwood Blvd to Royal Palm Beah Blvd EB 1, WB 1,464 Royal Palm Beah Blvd to Wildat Way 6LD EB 1,379 6LD WB 2,75 Wildat Way to SR 7 EB 1,248 WB 2,131 SR 7 to Sansbury's Way EB 1,264 WB 2,575 Sansbury's Way to Benoist Farms Rd EB 1,437 WB 2,92 Benoist Farms Rd to Skees Rd EB 1,376 WB 2,827 Skees Rd to jog Rd EB 1,454 WB 2,976 jog Rd to Turnpike 171 EB 2,14 Turnpike to Haverhill Rd 171 EB 1,93 Sem. Pratt Whitney Rd to Hall Blvd 2L EB 465 2L WB 472 Hall Blvd to 14th Ave 2L EB 465 2L WB 472 14th Ave to Avoado Blvd 2L EB 286 2L WB 469 Avoado Blvd to Coonut Blvd 2L EB 286 2L WB 469 14th Ave to Avoado Blvd 141 2L EB 89 2L WB 183 Avoado Blvd to Coonut Blvd 141 2L EB 89 Orange Grove Blvd I 44th 2L WB 183 Plae Coonut Blvd to Royal Palm Beah Blvd 141 2L EB 149 2L WB 275 Royal Palm Beah Blvd to SR 7 14 I 2L EB 151 -------- --- -- -- -- -- 2L WB 24 1 37 38 1 66 67 1 37 38 1 66 67 86 6 146 86 85 171 92 6 152 92 85 177 146 116 262 142 17 312 293 16 453 335 241 576 278 145 423 364 247 611 4 147 547 55 299 84 399 167 566 517 337 854 449 16 69 545 328 873 421 169 59 448 345 793 739 234 973 494 221 715 16 54 16 19 55 164 66 54 12 67 55 122 5 33 83 88 54 142 5 33 83 88 54 142 13 13 26 26 13 13 26 26 19 19 35 35 19 19 31 31 328 1,14 587 1,14 328 1,14 587 1,14 666 88 91 88 672 1,77 97 1,77 1,262 1,77 1,776 1,77 112) 1,712 2,68 128) 2,371 2,68 112) 1,551 3,59 128) 2,462 3,59 13361 1,475 3,94 1891) 2,488 3,94 13361 1,667 3,59 1891) 2,865 3,59 13361 1,649 3,59 18911 2,89 3,59 1336) 1,78 3,59 18911 2,878 3,59 1631 2,924 5,651 2,618 4,164 29 654 88 67 73 88 29 614 88 67 661 88 29 398 88 67 678 88 29 398 88 67 678 88 12 88 29 88 12 88 29 88 168 88 31 88 17 88 271 88 Yes 265 593 Yes Yes 228 815 Yes Yes 252 58 Yes Yes 217 84 Yes Yes 239 95 NO 196 NO 25 1,16 NO 196 Yes 225 898 Yes Yes 194 1,11 Yes Yes 212 1,474 Yes NO 182 1,958 NO 6LD 268 Yes 212 1,924 Yes Yes 182 2,553 Yes Yes 199 1,75 Yes Yes 171 2,633 Yes Yes 358 1,832 Yes Yes 38 2,796 Yes Yes 331 1,998 Yes Yes 285 3,15 Yes Yes 318 1,967 Yes Yes 274 3,83 Yes Yes 318 2,26 Yes Yes 274 3,152 Yes Yes 199 3,122 Yes Yes 199 2,817 Yes Yes 8 733 Yes Yes 68 771 Yes Yes 53 667 Yes Yes 46 76 Yes Yes 53 451 Yes Yes 46 724 Yes Yes 66 464 Yes Yes 57 735 Yes Yes 13 115 Yes Yes 11 221 Yes Yes 13 115 Yes Yes 11 221 Yes I Yes 53 221 Yes Yes 46 356 Yes Yes 27 197 Yes I Yes 23 293 Yes _I
Tl''>l 1 4'i4fl OU<. + 2M w-o Orttngt Grow 11-ll H-ll-14 '<l<>x Exhibit 68 11/1 1/214 P<iW' 7 ( H Test 1 Link Analysis PM Peak Hour 4546 DUs + 2M w/o Orange Grove Existing Roadway Link Lanes Dir (213) (1) Committed Dev. Analysis (2) TPS.5% Growth Total PM PEAK HOUR SR 7 Roebuk Total Servie Div. (3) Div.(3) Bkgd. Volume Prop. Improvements Meets Total Meets Servie Stdf Projet (235) Stdf Lanes Volume 14th Ave to Avoado Blvd (4) 2L EB 129 2L WB 261 Avoado Blvd to Coonut Blvd (4) 2L EB 129 19 19-38 38 19 19 148 88 299 88 148 88 Yes 437 585 Yes Yes 376 675 Yes Yes 424 572 Yes Persimmon Blvd 2L WB 261 Coonut Blvd to Royal Palm Beah Blvd (4) 2L EB 163 2L WB 356 Royal Palm Beah Blvd to SR 7 2L EB 255 38 38 5 2 25-43 43 16 3 46 299 88 188 88 399 88 31 88 Yes 365 664 Yes Yes 318 56 Yes Yes 274 673 Yes Yes 278 579 Yes 2L WB 363 1 42 52 415 88 Yes 24 655 Yes RPB North City Limits to Orange Grove Blvd NB 679 21 79 1 (12) 659 1,96 Yes 8 739 Yes 58 622 12 72 84 (28) 426 1,96 Yes 93 519 Yes Orange Grove Blvd to Persimmon Blvd NB 679 21 79 1 (12) 659 1,96 Yes 91 75 Yes Royel Palm Beah Blvd 58 622 Persimmon Blvd to 6th Street N 2L NB 679 12 72 84 21 79 1 (28) 426 1,96 (12) 659 88 Yes 16 532 Yes Yes 66 725 Yes 2L 58 622 6th Street N to Orang_e Blvd 2L NB 865 2L 58 638 Southern Blvd to Okeehobee Blvd NB 778 58 441 Okeehobee Blvd to Syamore/Site (9) NB 78 58 518 amore/site to Persimmon Blvd NB 781 58 595 Persimmon Blvd to 6th St N (11) 2L NB 781 Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd 2L 58 595 6th St N to Orange Blvd NB 51 58 592 Orange Blvd to Tem_Eie Blvd (6) NB 537 58 465 T em pie Blvd to Northlake Blvd (6) NB 537 58 465 Northlake Blvd to North (4) 2L NB 65 CR 88 to Lion Country Safari EB 811 WB 497 L'1on Country Safari to Seminole Pratt (6) 6LD EB 1,66 6LD WB 67 Seminole Pratt to Binks Forest Dr (6) 6LD EB 1,265 Southern Blvd 6LD WB 1,15 Binks Forest Dr to Big BlueT r (6) 6LD EB 1,339 6LD WB 1,349 Big Blue Trae to Palms West Pkwy (6) 6LD EB 1,744 6LD WB 1,893 Palms West Pkwy to Forest Hill Blvd 6LD EB 1,744 6LD WB 1,893 2 72 92 21 1 121 12 74 86 226 9 316 29 51 341 136 9 226 124 6 184 76 91 167 76 69 145 76 91 167 76 69 145 76 59 135 76 69 145 31 62 93 3 54 84 31 62 93 3 54 84 25 8 33 51 94 595 851 58 99 554 124 678 93 7 973 559 147 76 846 128 974 679 155 834 882 156 1,38 573 22 775 772 22 992 556 22 758 74 22 96 (28) 434 88 (53) 933 88 (251) 473 88 1,94 1,96 782 1,96 1,6 1,96 72 1,96 948 1,96 74 1,96 948 81 74 81 (29) 616 1,96 (67) 67 1,96 (57) 573 1,96 (133) 416 1,96 (57) 573 1,96 (133) 416 1,96 98 1,14 1,46 2,42 1,46 2,42 1,744 2,94 1,58 2,94 1,971 2,94 2,79 2,94 2,173 2,94 2,387 2,94 2,519 2,68 2,885 2,68 2,52 2,68 2,853 2,68 Yes 57 491 Yes NO 13 947 NO 196 Yes 11 484 Yes Yes 52 1,596 Yes Yes 583 1,365 Yes Yes 753 1,759 Yes Yes 875 1,577 Yes Yes 867 1,814 Yes Yes 1,7 1,747 Yes NO 848 1,796 NO 61D 268 Yes 73 1,47 NO 6LD 268 Yes 716 1,332 Yes Yes 616 1,286 Yes Yes 53 1,13 Yes Yes 456 872 Yes Yes 424 997 Yes Yes 365 781 Yes Yes 13 111 Yes Yes 57 1,463 Yes Yes 66 1,472 Yes Yes 68 1,812 Yes Yes 8 1,66 Yes Yes 54 2,474 Yes Yes 433 2,513 Yes Yes 451 2,624 Yes Yes 388 2,775 Yes Yes 411 2,93 NO 359 NO 354 3,238 NO 359 Yes 411 2,913 NO 81 [) 359 NO 354 3,26 NO 359
Exhibit 68 Test 1 Link Analysis- PM Peak Hour- 4546 DlJs + 2M w/o Orange Grove lp;l 1 4'i4f> DU" + 2M w-o Orrtngl' Crow 1 '-1 \ fl-1 -H.x.l<,x. 1111 Vl14 Prtgl' f\ nf 11 Roadway Southern Blvd SR 7 SR 71/ Beeline Highway Link Forest Hill Blvd to ess Head Cypress Head to Royal Palm Beah Blvd Royal Palm Beah Blvd to SR 7 SR 7 to Sansbury's Way Sansbury's Way to Benoist Farms Rd Benoist farms Rd to Pike Rd(TP Belvedere Rd to Okeehobee Blvd Okeehobee Blvd to Roebuk Rd (6) Roebuk Rd to Orange Grove Blvd (6) Orange Grove Blvd to Persimmon Blvd (6) Persimmon Blvd to 6th St N (61 6th St N to Northlake Blvd (6) Northlake Blvd to jog Rd Turnpike Lake Worth Rd to Southern Blvd (1 ) --. -. -- - - - lanes 6LD 6LD 6LD 6LD Dir EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB 6LD NB 6LD 58 NB 58 NB SB NB SB NB 58 NB SB EB Existing Committed Dev. Analysis (2} (213} (1} TPS.5% Growth Total 1,953 434 226 66 2,674 583 31 893 2,28 4 235 635 2,61 519 33 822 2,389 368 277 645 3,365 62 39 1,1 2,23 291 259 55 2,933 218 34 558 2,125 186 246 432 3,261 17 378 485 2,125 116 246 362 3,261 119 378 497 1,726 439 2 639 1,465 429 17 599 1,93 73 127 2 451 63 52 115 1,93 73 127 2 451 66 52 118 1,93 73 127 2 451 66 52 118 - - 89 243 13 346 WB 1,421 964 165 1 '129 4LX 58_ - 3,2- - '--- :J_'l_2_ - 392 SR 7 Div.(3} PM PEAK HOUR Roebuk Total Div.(3} Bkgd. 12 (72) 28 484 12 28 12 28 12 28 177 413 2,613 3,567 2,663 3,432 3,34 4,375 2,78 3,491 2,557 3,746 2,487 3,758 2,365 2,64 1,341 1,33 1,413 849 1,413 849 12 28 177 413 1,236 2,55 3,62 Servie Volume 2,94 2,94 2,94 2,94 3,94 3,94 3,94 3,94 3,94 3,94 3,59 3,59 2,68 2,68 1,96 1,96 3,32 3,32 3,32 3,32 3,32 3,32 3,32 3,32 1,96 1,96 3,72 Prop. Improvements Meets Total Meets Servie Stdl Proj_et (235} Stdl lanes Volume Yes 35 2,918 Yes NO 262 3,829 NO 394 Yes 35 2,968 NO 394 NO 262 3,694 NO 8t f).194 Yes 35 3,339 Yes NO 262 4,638 NO + 494 Yes 265 3,45 Yes Yes 228 3,719 Yes Yes 239 2,796 Yes Yes 25 3,951 NO + 494 Yes 239 2,726 Yes NO 25 3,963 NO + 45 Yes 148 2,513 Yes Yes 172 2,236 Yes Yes 38 1,649 Yes Yes 358 1,688 Yes Yes 388 1,81 Yes Yes 451 1,3 Yes Yes 38 1,721 Yes Yes 358 1,27 Yes Yes 137 257 Yes Yes 159 439 Yes Yes 16 283 Yes Yes 91 54 Yes Yes 119 1,356 Yes NO 13 2,652 NO 6LD 294 Yes 212 3,832 N(12) ( 1) Count data from Palm Beah County. See App 'ndix A. t21 Committed development data from County TPS Database. See Appendix D. (3) [)iver5ion analysis inluded in Appendix F. (4) Link ount based on intersetion ount data from 28-213. See Appendix A. tsi Utilizes 22 traffi volume projetion from Jog Road Extension Intersetion Study by PTC, PTC#9-68, dated 9/23/1. See Appendix A. t61 Inludes programmed improvement to 4 lanes (Northlake Blvd in 217, SR 7 in 216, 217 & 218, Seminole Pratt-Whitney Rd in 214) and 6 lanes Southern Blvd in 218. (7) Utilizes CRALLS servie volume. 181 Utilized 211 ount. (9) Utili1ed average of adjaent ounts. (11 Ut1l1zed FOOT 212 ount. (111 Utilized Class II volume for buildout year. (121 Any trips ass1gned to a toll-fmaned faility shall be eliminated from the proportionate share analysis.
BURNS ROAD NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD N.T.S. BEELINE HWY HAVERHILL RD MILITARY TRAIL I-95 TURNPIKE CENTRAL BLVD PGA BOULEVARD SITE 6th STREET N 45TH ST SEMINOLE PRATT-WHITNEY ROAD 14th AVE AVOCADO BLVD ROYAL PALM BEACH BLVD 14th AVE COCONUT BOULEVARD STATE ROAD 7 ORANGE BOULEVARD B. HERON BLVD PERSIMMON BLVD ORANGE GROVE BLVD ROEBUCK ROAD OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD SANSBURYS WAY JOG ROAD ROEBUCK ROAD BELVEDERE ROAD BENOIST FARMS ROAD CRESTWOOD BLVD B ROAD FOLSOM RD JOG ROAD SYCAMORE DRIVE SOUTHERN BOULEVARD EXHIBIT 6C MINTO WEST ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS PTC BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 8/12/14 13-13 B. FOREST RD B. BLUE TRACE F. HILL BLVD HALL BLVD TEMPLE BLVD LEGEND - 4 LANE - 6 LANE - 8 LANE - 8+ LANE
BURNS ROAD NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD N.T.S. BEELINE HWY HAVERHILL RD MILITARY TRAIL I-95 TURNPIKE CENTRAL BLVD PGA BOULEVARD SITE 6th STREET N 45TH ST SEMINOLE PRATT-WHITNEY ROAD 14th AVE AVOCADO BLVD ROYAL PALM BEACH BLVD 14th AVE COCONUT BOULEVARD STATE ROAD 7 ORANGE BOULEVARD B. HERON BLVD PERSIMMON BLVD ORANGE GROVE BLVD ROEBUCK ROAD OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD SANSBURYS WAY JOG ROAD ROEBUCK ROAD BELVEDERE ROAD BENOIST FARMS ROAD CRESTWOOD BLVD B ROAD FOLSOM RD JOG ROAD SYCAMORE DRIVE SOUTHERN BOULEVARD EXHIBIT 6D MINTO WEST ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS PTC TOTAL TRAFFIC 8/12/14 13-13 B. FOREST RD B. BLUE TRACE F. HILL BLVD HALL BLVD TEMPLE BLVD LEGEND - 4 LANE - 6 LANE - 8 LANE - 8+ LANE
Exhibit 7A Proportionate Share Analysis - AM Peak Hour (1) Prop Share 13-13 8-13-14.xlsx 8/13/214 AM PEAK HOUR (3) Prog. Servie Roadway Link Lanes Dir Volume Orange Blvd to NB 88 2L Temple Blvd SB 88 Coonut Blvd Temple Blvd to NB 88 2L Northlake Blvd SB 88 14th Ave to EB 196 Coonut Blvd WB 196 Coonut Blvd to EB 196 Ibis WB 196 EB 196 Northlake Blvd Ibis to SR 7 WB 196 OkPehobee Blvd SR 7 to Beeline EB 332 Hwy WB 332 Steeplehase Dr to EB 294 6LD Military Trail WB 294 14th Ave (E Rd) to EB 88 2L Folsom Rd WB 88 Crestwood to Royal EB 177 Palm Beah WB 177 Royal Palm Beah EB 268 6LD to Wildat Way WB 268 Royal Palm Beah 6th St to Orange NB 88 2L Blvd Blvd SB 88 Big Blue Tr to EB 268 6LD Palms West Pkwy WB 268 Palms West Pkwy EB 268 6LD to Forest Hill WB 268 Forest Hi II to EB 294 6LD Cypress Head WB 294 Cypress Head to EB 294 6LD Royal Palm Beah WB 294 Southern Blvd Royal Palm Beah EB 394 to SR 7 WB 394 SR 71 /Beeline SR 7 to Sansbury EB 394 WB 394 Sansbury to Benoist EB 394 8LO Farms WB 394 Benoist Farms to EB 359 Pike Rd/Tpike WB 359 Northlake Blvd to EB 196 jog Rd WB 196 New Prop. Servie Capaity Lanes Volume Created 6LD 6LD 6LD + + + + + 6LD 196 18 196 18 196 18 196 18 294 98 294 98 394 198 394 198 394 198 394 198 498 166 498 166 394 1 394 1 196 18 196 18 268 91 268 91 359 91 359 91 196 18 196 18 359 91 359 91 359 91 359 91 494 2 494 2 394 1 394 1 494 1 494 1 494 1 494 1 494 1 494 1 45 91 45 91 294 98 294 98 Soure/ 235 Length Road Cost of Bkgd (miles) Type Improve. (2) Traffi 1. Urban 1.2 Urban 1.5 Urban 2. Urban.5 Urban 2.8 Urban 1.3 Urban 1.2 Urban.7 Urban 1.3 Urban 1. Urban.5 Rural.3 Urban.6 Urban.4 Urban 1.7 Urban 1.1 Urban.6 Urban.7 Urban 1.2 Urban $2,946,76 87 $2,946,76 $3,42,312 1136 $3,42,312 $3,769,35 1753 $3,769,35 $11,292,56 298 $11,292,56 $3,73,14 3183 $3,73,14 $6,924,12 3678 $6,924,12 $4,458,394 $4,458,394 $4,167,312 889 $4,167,312 $1,731,3 1664 $1,731,3 $4,563,394 2518 $4,563,394 $2,992,76 $2,992,76 121 $826,86 2852 $826,86 $85,14 2841 $85,14 $3,624,588 3727 $3,624,588 $2,78,352 366 $2,78,352 $7,762,92 463 $7,762,92 $4,113,36 4364 $4,113,36 $2,64,56 3972 $2,64,56 $2,76,32 3947 $2,76,32 $2,967,48 2838 $2,967,48 Bkgd Cost Mitig. Bkgd Share of Bkgd Projet Projet De f. Of Cost Defiieny Traffi Traffi -1 None $ - 13 93-88 None $ 256 23.7% $ 86,474 114 114-88 None $ -27 None $ - 364 157-196 None $ - 12 51.5% $ 5,817,379 456 456-196 None $ 1223 61.8% $ 2,287,344 433 433-196 None $ - 358 21.6% $ 1,493,274 513 513-332 None $ -294 None $ - -294 None $ 9.8% $ 34,728 25 25-88 None $ -16 None $ 182 76-177 None $ -162 None $ 182 2-268 None $ -88 None $ 141 13.1% $ 39,721 12 12 172 18.9% $ 156,286 353 353-268 None $ 161 17.7% $ 15,387 353 353-268 None $ 787 39.4% $ 1,426,275 262 262-294 None $ 72 72.% $ 1,496,413 262 262-294 None $ 123 12.3% $ 954,839 262 262-394 None $ 424 42.4% $ 1,744,65 228 228-394 None $ 32 3.2% $ 83,346 25 25-394 None $ 357 39.2% $ 1,82,895 25 25-359 None $ - 878 89.6% $ 2,658,62 13 13-196 None $ - 235 Total Traffi 973 125 2117 3436 3616 4191 194 1846 27 133 325 3194 3989 3922 4325 4592 4177 4152 2941 Projet Share Prop Share Of Cost Calulation 8.6% $ 253,749.% $ 1.6% $ 359,133.% $ 16.% $ 63,865.% $ 23.% $ 2,6,711.% $ 21.9% $ 89,828.% $ 3.9% $ 2,139,83.% $.% $ I.% $ 19.% $ 791,18.% $ 8.4% $ 144,57.% $ 2.2% $ 1,294.% $.% $ 1.1% $ 33,253 38.8% $ 32,749.% $ 38.8% $ 329,731.% $ 13.1% $ 474,821.% $ 26.2% $ 544,528.% $ 26.2% $ 2,33,885.% $. 22.8% $ 937,846.% $ - 2.5% $ 533,935.% $ 22.5% $ 621,83.% $ - 1.5% $ 311,888.% $ (1) See Exhibit 6A for traffi volume data. (2) Calulation of improvement ost provided on Exhibit 7. (J) Bakground and Projet Traffi are shown as '' for insignifiant or underapaity links. + is omparable to 5 lanes in one diretion.
Exhibit 78 Proportionate Share Analysis - PM Peak Hour (1) Prop Share 13-13 8-13-14.xlsx 8/13/214 PM PEAK HOUR (3) Prog. Servie Roadway Link Lanes Dir Volume Coonut Blvd Northlake Blvd Okt>ehobee Blvd Orange Blvd to NB 88 2L Temple Blvd SB 88 Temple Blvd to NB 88 2L Northlake Blvd SB 88 14th Ave to EB 196 Coonut Blvd WB 196 Coonut to Ibis Ibis to SR 7 EB 196 WB 196 EB 196 WB 196 SR 7 to Beeline EB 332 Hwy WB 332 14th Ave (E Rdi to EB 88 2L Folsom Rd WB 88 Crestwood to Royal EB 177 Palm Beah WB 177 Royal Palm Beah EB 268 6LD to Wildat Way WB 268 Royal Palm Beah 6th St to OrangE' NB 88 2L Blvd Blvd SB 88 Southt>rn Blvd SR 71 /Beeline Big Blue Tr to EB 268 6LD Palms West Pkwy WB 268 Palms West Pkwy EB 268 6LD to Forest Hill WB 268 Forest Hill to EB 294 6LD Cyprt>ss Head WB 294 Cypress Head to EB 294 6LD Royal Palm Beah WB 294 Royal Palm Beah EB 394 to SR 7 WB 394 EB 394 SR 7 to Sansbury WB 394 Sansbury to Benoist EB 394 Farms WB 394 Benoist Farms to EB 359 Pike Rd/Tpike WB 359 Northlake Blvd to EB 196 jog Rd WB 196 New Prop. Servie Capaity Lanes Volume Created 6LD 6LD 6LD + + + + 6LD 196 18 196 18 196 18 196 18 294 98 294 98 394 198 394 198 394 198 394 198 498 166 498 166 196 18 196 18 268 91 268 91 359 91 359 91 196 18 196 18 359 91 359 91 359 91 359 91 394 1 394 1 394 1 394 1 494 1 494 1 494 1 494 1 494 1 494 1 45 91 45 91 294 98 294 98 Soure/ 235 Length Road Cost of Bkgd (miles) Type Improve. (2) Traffi 1. Urban 1.2 Urban 1.5 Urban 2. Urban.5 Urban 2.8 Urban 1.2 Urban.7 Urban 1.3 Urban 1. Urban.5 Rural.3 Urban.6 Urban.4 Urban 1.7 1.1.6 Urban Urban Urban.7 Urban 1.2 Urban $2,946,76 $2,946,76 889 $3,42,312 $3,42,312 115 $3,769,35 $3,769,35 1727 $11,292,56 $11,292,56 2818 $3,73,14 $3,73,14 2911 $6,924,12 $6,924,12 3314 $4,167,312 666 $4,167,312 91 $1,731,3 $1,731,3 1776 $4,563,394 $4,563,394 $2,992,76 933 $2,992,76 $826,86 2519 $826,86 2885 $85,14 252 $85,14 2853 $1,7,28 $1,7,28 3567 $2,78,352 2663 $2,78,352 3432 $7,762,92 $7,762,92 4375 $4,113,36 $4,113,36 $2,64,56 $2,64,56 3746 $2,76,32 $2,76,32 3758 $2,967,48 $2,967,48 255 Bkgd Cost Mitig. Bkgd Share of Bkgd Projet Projet De f. Of Cost Defiieny Traffi Traffi -88 None $ 9.8% $ 24,556 13 13-88 None $ 135 12.5% $ 425,289 114 114-196 None $ - -233 None $ 365 132-196 None $ - 858 43.3% $ 4,893,443 456 456-196 None $ 951 48.% $ 1,778,629 433 433-332 None $ -6 None $ 513 57-214 None $ - 239 25 21 1.9% $ 81,31 25 25-177 None $ - 6.7% $ 11,413 182 182-268 None $ - -268 None $ - 53 4.9% $ 146,867 13 13-88 None $ -161 None $ - 411 25 25 22.5% $ 186,271 354 354-178 None $ 411 233 173 19.% $ 161,596 354 354-294 None $ 627 62.7% $ 1,65,918 262 262-277 None $ 35 28 492 49.2% $ 1,22,549 262 262-394 None $ 435 43.5% $ 3,376,87 262 262-394 None $ -394 None $ -394 None $ -194 None $ 25 11-359 None $ 168 18.5% $ 59,598 25 25-196 None $ 59 6.2% $ 1,786,544 13 13 235 Total Traffi 992 1129 292 3274 3344 3827 95 116 1958 946 293 3239 2913 327 3829 2968 3694 4637 3951 3963 2653 Projet Share Prop Share Of Cost Calulation.% $ 9.5% $ 281,34.% $ 1.6% $ 359,133.% $ 13.5% $ 57,78.% $ 23.% $ 2,6,711.% $ 21.9% $ 89,828.% $ 3.5% $ 2,114,776 2.3% $ 96,466 19.% $ 791,18.% $ 2.% $ 346,26.% $.% $ 1.2% $ 36,24.% $ 27.5% $ 227,159 38.9% $ 321,658 25.6% $ 217,641 38.9% $ 33,665.% $ 26.2% $ 445,47 2.8% $ 58,194 26.2% $ 544,528.% $ 26.2% $ 2,33,885.% $.% $.% $ 1.1% $ 28,65.% $ 22.5% $ 621,83.% $ - 1.5% $ 311,888 (1 I See Exhibit 6B for traffi volume data. (2) Calulation of improvement ost provided on Exhibit 7. (3) Bakground and Projet Traffi are shown as '' for insignifiant or underapaity links. + is omparable to 5 lanes in one diretion.
Prop Shore 13-13 8-13-14.xlsx 8/13/214 Exhibit 7C Proportionate Share Analysis - Total Exist. RoadW<tt link Lanes Dir Coonut Blvd Northlake Blvd Okeehobee Blvd Orange Blvd to Temple Blvd Temple Blvd to Northlake Blvd 14th Ave to Coonut Blvd Coonut Blvd to ibis Ibis to SR 7 SR 7 to Beeline Hwy 14th Ave (E Rd) to Folsom Rd Crestwood to Royal Palm Beah 2L SB 2L SB WB EB EB Ws 2L EB r-ws Royal Palm Beah 6LD to Wildat Way WB Royal Palm Beah 6th St to Orange NB 2L Blvd Blvd r-ss Big Blue Tr to EB 6LD Palms West Pkwy 'WB Palms West Pkwy 6LD to Forest Hill WB Forest Hill to 6LD Cypress Head WB Cypress Head to EB 6LD Royal Palm Beah r-ws Southern Blvd Royal Palm Beah EB to SR 7 SR 71 /Beeline 'WB SR 7 to Sansbury WB Sansbury to Benoist Farms Benoist Farms to Pike Rd(T pike Northlake Blvd to Jog Rd WB EB rws- EB rws- rws- NB r-ss TIM New Prop. Right of Servie Lanes Way(1) Volume 6LD 6LD 6LD + + + + + 6LD 8ft 8ft 24ft 24ft 12ft 18ft 12ft 12ft 12ft 8ft 22ft 22ft 22ft 22ft 22ft 22ft 22ft 22ft 2ft 196 196 196 196 294 294 394 394 394 394 498 498 196 196 268 268 359 359 196 196 359 359 359 359 494 494 394 394 494 494 494 494 494 494 45 45 294 294 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Cost Projet's Cost Projet's Bkgd's Projet's of Bkgd Prop Share of Bkgd Prop Share Highest Highest Defiieny Calulation Defiieny Calulation Diretional Diretional $ - $ 253,749 $ $ - $ $ 253,749 $ $ $ 24,556 $ 281,34 $ 24,556 $ 281,34 $ 86,474 $ 359,133 $ $ - $ 86,474 $ 359,133 $ - $ $ 425,289 $ 359,133 $ 425,289 $ 359,133 $ $ 63,865 $ $ $ - $ 63,865 $ $ $ $ 57,78 $ $ 57,78 $ 5,817,379 $ 2,6,711 $ $ $ 5,817,379 $ 2,6,711 $ $ $ 4,893,443 $ 2,6,711 $ 4,893,443 $ 2,6,711 $ 2,287,344 $ 89,828 $ $ - $ 2,287,344 $ 89,828 $ - $ $ 1,778,629 $ 89,828 $ 1,778,629 $ 89,828 $ 1,493,274 $ 2,139,83 $ - $ $ 1,493,274 $ 2,139,83 $ - $ $ $ 2,114,776 $ $ 2,114,776 $ 34,728 $ 791,18 $ $ 96,466 $ 34,728 $ 791,18 $ $ $ 81,31 $ 791,18 $ 81,31 $ 791,18 $ $ 144,57 $ - $ - $ $ 144,57 $ $ $ 11,413 $ 346,26 $ 11,413 $ 346,26 $ $ 1,294 $ $ $ - $ 1,294 $ $ - $ $ $ - $ $ - $ $ 146,867 $ 36,24 $ 146,867 $ 36,24 $ 39,721 $ 33,253 $ - $ $ 156,286 $ 32,749 $ - $ 227,159 $ $ $ 186,271 $ 321,658 $ 15,387 $ 329,731 $ - $ 217,641 $ $ $ 161,596 $ 33,665 $ 1,426,275 $ 474,821 $ - $ - $ - $ $ 1,65,918 $ 445,47 $ 1,496,413 $ 544,528 $ $ 58,194 $ $ $ 1,22,549 $ 544,528 $ 954,839 $ 2,33,885 $ $ $ $ $ 3,376,87 $ 2,33,885 $ 1,744,65 $ 937,846 $ - $ $ $ $ - $ $ 83,346 $ 533,935 $ $ $ $ - $ - $ 28,65 $ 1,82,895 $ 621,83 $ $ - $ $ $ 59,598 $ 621,83 $ 2,658,62 $ 311,888 $ $ - $ $ $ 1,786,544 $ 311,888 $ 39,721 $ 33,253 $ 156,286 $ 32,749 $ 186,271 $ 321,658 $ 15,387 $ 329,731 $ 161,596 $ 33,665 $ 1,426,275 $ 474,821 $ 1,65,918 $ 445,47 $ 1,496,413 $ 544,528 $ 1,22,549 $ 544,528 $ 954,839 $ 2,33,885 $ 3,376,87 $ 2,33,885 $ 1,744,65 $ 937,846 $ $ - $ 83,346 $ 533,935 $ $ 28,65 $ 1,82,895 $ 621,83 $ 59,598 $ 621,83 $ 2,658,62 $ 311,888 $ 1,786,544 $ 311,888 TOTAL I $ 36,53,62 I $ 26,43,3861 (1) Soure: Map TE 14.1 Thoroughfare Right of Way Identifiation Map of Palm Beah County Comprehensive Plan. + is omparable to 5 lanes in one diretion.
Prnp Shr1n 1 1-1 \ t\- 1 \-H.xlo.,x R/1 \'114 Exhibit 7 Proportionate Share Analysis - Cost Estimates Soure/ Cost of Improvement Roadway Link Prog. Lanes Prop. Lanes Length (miles) Road Link Type Constr. (1) Intersetion (2) Des/Perm/CEI 2"/o R/W(2) Total Orange Blvd tot em pie Blvd 2l 1. Urban $4,579,6 $9, $933,92 $29, $5,893,52 Coonut Blvd Temple Blvd to Northlake Blvd 2l 1.2 Urban $5,495,52 $ $1,99,14 $21, $6,84,624 14th Ave to Coonut Blvd 6LD 1.5 Urban $6,182,25 $ $1,236,45 $12, $7,538,7 Coonut to Ibis 2. Urban $17,687,6 $ $3,537,52 $1,36, $22,585,12 Northlake Blvd Ibis to SR 7.5 Urban $4,421,9 $ $884,38 $2,1, $7,46,28 SR 7 to Beeline Hwy 4lD 6lD 2.8 Urban $11,54,2 $ $2,38,4 $ $13,848,24 14th Ave (E Rdl to Folsom Rd 2l 1.2 Urban $5,495,52 $ $1,99,14 $1,74, $8,334,624 Okeehobee Blvd Crestwood to Royal Palm Beah 6LD.7 Urban $2,885,5 $ $577,1 $ $3,462,6 Royal Palm Beah to Wildat Way 6LD 1.3 Urban $6,138,99 $ $1,227,798 $1,76, $9,126,788 Royal Palm Beah Blvd 6th St to Orange Blvd 2l 1. Urban $4,579,6 $ $915,92 $49, $5,985,52 Big BlueT r to Palms West Pkwy 6LD.5 Rural $1,328,1 $5, $275,62 $ $1,653,72 Palms West Pkwy to Forest Hill 6LD.3 Urban $1,416,69 $ $283,338 $ $1,7,28 Forest Hill to Cypress Head 6lD.6 Urban $2,833,38 $ $566,676 $ $3,4,56 Forest Hill to Cypress Head +.6 Urban $3,27,6 $ $641,52 $ $3,849,12 Southern Blvd Cypress Head to Royal Palm Beah 6LD.4 Urban $1,888,92 $ $377,784 $1,89, $4,156,74 Royal Palm Beah to SR 7 + 1.7 Urban $9,88,2 $ $1,817,64 $4,62, $15,525,84 SR 7 to Sansbury + 1.1 Urban $5,88,6 $ $1,176,12 $1 '17, $8,226,72 Sansbury to Benoist Farms +.6 Urban $3,27,6 $ $641,52 $1,36, $5,29,12 Benoist Farms to Pike Rd!T pike +.7 Urban $3,742,2 $ $748,44 $1,3, $5,52,64 SR 71/Beeline Northlake Blvd to Jog Rd 6lD 1.2 Urban $4,945,8 $ $989,16 $ $5,934,96 (11 Road Improvement Constrution Cost Per Mile Urban: 2l to $4,579,6 Urban: to 6LD $4,121,5 Urban: 6LD to $4,722,3 Urban: to + $5,346, Rural: 2l to $2,656,9 Rural: to 6LD $2,38,7 Rural: 6LD to $2,656,2 Rural: to + $3,33,3 ' Based on FOOT Generi Cost Per Mile Models, April 214. (21 See Appendix G for ost estimates from Simmons & White and Palm Beah County.
Exhibit 7E Intersetion Proportionate Share Analysis (1) Prop Shtr(' lntf'f'>t'c!!on., 1 l-fll 1 li-ll>-14 Hflt>/2fl14 Northlake Blvd & Beeline H - PM Peak Hour Total Volume w/existing Lanes (2) Total Volume w/proposed Improvements (2) Add'! Capaity of Improvement Projet Trips in Intersetion Projet's% of Add'! Capaity Estimated Cost of Improvement (3) Projet's Prop Share Payment 486 9311 4451 111 24.9% $34,7, $8,653,561 Okeehobee & SR 7 - PM Peak Hour Total Volume w/existing Lanes (2) Total Volume w/proposed Improvements (2) Add'! Capaity of Improvement Projet Trips in Intersetion Projet's % of Add'! Capaity Estimated Cost of Improvement (4) Projet's Prop Share Payment 645 147 42 986 24.6% $4,, $9,855,72 Okeehobee Blvd & I!?& Rd - PM Peak Hour Total Volume w/existing Lanes (2) Total Volume w/proposed Improvements (2) Add'! Capaity of Improvement Projet Trips in Intersetion Projet's% of Add'! Capaity Estimated Cost of Improvement (5) Projet's Prop Share Payment 8324 9787 1463 666 45.5% $1,828,823 $832,533 Persimmon Blvd & Ro::al Palm Beah Blvd -AM Peak Hour Total Volume w/existing Lanes (2) Total Volume w/proposed Improvements (2) Add'! Capaity of Improvement Projet Trips in Intersetion Projet's% of Add'! Capaity Estimated Cost of Improvement (5) Projet's Prop Share Payment 2614 3554 94 676 71.9% $1,733,28 $1,246,486 Southern Blvd & Seminole Pratt Whitne:: Rd -AM Peak Hour Total Volume w/existing Lanes (2) Total Volume w/proposed Improvements (2) Add'! Capaity of Improvement Projet Trips in Intersetion Projet's% of Add'! Capaity Estimated Cost of Improvement (5) Projet's Prop Share Payment 5146 641 1264 126 81.2% $336,92 $273,481 Southern Blvd & Forest Hill Blvd - PM Peak Hour Total Volume w/existing Lanes (2) Total Volume w/proposed Improvements (2) Add'! Capaity of Improvement Projet Trips in Intersetion Projet's % of Add'l Capaity Estimated Cost of Improvement (5) Projet's Prop Share Payment 9277 11141 1864 764 41.% $6,135,733 $2,514,861 Total Intersetion Prop Share Payment $23,375,995 111 See Appendix E for intersetion proportionate share anlayses. (2) Total approah volumes through intersetion at whih point the level of servie of the intersetion goes from D to E. (31 Soure: FDOT PD&E. 141 Soure: Palm Beah MPO. (51 See Appendix C for ost estimates from Simmons & White and Palm Beah County.
Exhibit 7F Intersetions- Requested Dual Left Turn Lanes- Proportionate Share lx 7f Dualletl' Prop Share 13-13 8-15-14 8/15/214 Page 1 ot 1 left Turn Highest New Highest 235 Projet Capaity on Intersetion Movement Total Volume Volume Approah (1) Projet Share length Cost Projet of of Share lmjl- (feet) (1) llllj!- (2) of Cost 6th Street & SR 7 Westbound 33 23 25 9o/o 6 $ 27,828 $ 19,12 Northlake Blvd & Jog Rd (3) Westbound 392 25 Oo/o 6 $ 27,828 $ - Southbound 278 25 Oo/o 6 $ 27,828 $ - Okeehobee Blvd & Benoist Farms Rd Westbound 259 25 Oo/o 6 $ 27,828 $ - Orange Blvd & Seminole Pratt- Whitney Rd Westbound 495 68 25 27% 6 $ 27,828 $ 56,529 Eastbound 281 57 5 11 o/o 12 $ 415,656 $ 47,385 Orange Blvd & Coonut (4) Southbound 328 25 Oo/o 6 $ 27,828 $ - Orange Grove Blvd & SR 7 Northbound 351 8 25 32% 6 $ 27,828 $ 66,55 Persimmon Blvd & SR 7 Northbound 69 194 25 78% 6 $ 27,828 $ 161,275 Roebuk Rd & SR 7 Southbound 415 68 25 27% 6 $ 27,828 $ 56,529 Southern Blvd & Binks Forest Northbound 398 46 25 18% 6 $ 27,828 $ 38,24 Dr Southbound 263 25 Oo/o 6 $ 27,828 $ - TOTAL $ 445,583 (1) Soure: Briger DRI Intersetion Proportionate Share Methodolgy. (2) FOOT Generi Cost Per Mile Model for New Constrution Extra Cost for Additional Lane on Urban Arterial of $1,828,886 ost per mile. (3) Requires 2 lanes- 1 additional westbound and 1 additional southbound. (4) Requires 3 lanes- 2 eastbound and 1 additional southbound.
Exhibit 8 Okeehobee Boulevard CRALLS Mitigation 8/13/214 CRALLS Mitigation 13-13 8-13-14 xlsx Points Required 69. Strategy 5 - Ride Sharing Programs Qualifying Criteria 465 On-Site Employees Partiipating (15%) 4 Days a Week Partiipation 2,, SF of Non-Residential Building Area Credit Fator= (465*2*4/5)/(5 *Square Root of 2) =.33 (93*.14*.33)/4= 1.7 Points Strategy 9 - Provide Aess to More than One Road Qualifying Criteria Aess to Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road, 6th Street N, Persimmon & Orange Grove Assignment to 6th, Pers, &. Grove- 4,932 x 35% = 1,726 *.86 = 1,484 (1484*.1)/4= 3.71 Points Credit Fator =.1 Strategy 13- Compressed Work Week/ Non-Peak Hour Work Hours Qualifying Criteria 62 On-Site Employees Partiipating (2%) 2 Days a Week Partiipation 7 Hours per Week Partiipants will not drive 2,, SF of Non-Residential Building Area Credit Fator = (62 x (2 + 7/(5-2))/(5 * Square Root of 2) = 1.2 (124*.14*1.2)/4= 5.22 Points Strategy 14 - Additional Mitigation Fee Payment Qualifying Criteria Road Impat Fee Residential Daily Trips- 34,222 * $728.6 = Non-Residential Daily Trips- 29,34 *$242.69 = Credit Fator= (.1 *3364 +.5*1.5) = 3.42 (69*3.42)/4= 59. Points Total Impat Fee = $32,36,194 Additional Impat Fee = $3,363,8 (1.5%) I TOTAL POINTS= 69.( NOTE: Methodology presented by County. Appliant does not agree with methodology, but has utilized to expedite proess.
8/13/214 Tripgen Test 213-13 8-13-14.xlsx Exhibit 9 Trip Generation- Test 2-5 Year Phase DAILY ITE Land Use Code Intensity Single-Family Residential 21 5 DUs TOTAL Trip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips 1 /DU 5, 5, AM PEAK HOUR ITE Land Use Code Intensity Single-Family Residential 21 5 DUs TOTAL Total Trips Trip Generation Rate (1) In Out Total.75 /DU (25/75) 94 281 375 94 281 375 PM PEAK HOUR ITE Land Use Code Intensity Single-Family Residential 21 5 DUs TOTAL Total Trips Trip Generation Rate (1) In Out Total Ln (T) =.9Ln (X)+.51 (63/37) 282 165 447 282 165 447 (1) Soure: Palm Beah County and the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITEirip Generation 9th Edition.
Exhibit 1A Projet Traffi Assignment- Test 2 Assign Tesl2 B-13 8-13-14 xlsx 8/13/214 Page 1 oi 1 AM Peak Hour 6th Street N 14th Avenue N Avoado Boulevard Coonut Boulevard Crestwood Boulevard
Exhibit 1A Projet Traffi Assignment- Test 2 AsSign Test 2 13-13 8-13-14.xlsx 8/13/214 Page 2 of 1 AM Peak Hour Northlake Boulevard Okeehobee Boulevard
Exhibit 1A Projet Traffi Assignment- Test 2 Assign Test 2 13-13 8-11-14xlsx 8 1 13/214 Page 3 oi 1 AM Peak Hour Orange Boulevard Orange Grove Boulevard I 44th Plae Persimmon Boulevard Royal Palm Beah Blvd
Exhibit 1A Projet Traffi Assignment- Test 2 Assign lpst 2 13-13 8-13-14.xlsx 8/13/214 Page 4 oi 1 AM Peak Hour Southern Boulevard SR 7
Exhibit 1A Projet Traffi Assignment- Test 2 Assign Tst 2 13-13 8-13-14 xlsx 8/13/214 Page 5 oi 1 AM Peak Hour (1) Soure: 29 FOOT Quality I LOS Handbook. (2) Roadway link is not inluded on the Major Throughfare Identifiation Map. Loal Road Level of Servie analysis not required per PBC ULDC Artile 12. (3) Munipal roadway. Loal Road Level of Servie analysis not required per PBC ULDC Artile 12, Setion A.3.A.2. (4) One lane northbound and two lanes southbound. (5) Servie volume is based on LOS C in "Transitioning Area" for this SIS faility. r-,..::::::::::::::::;:!itr;":c:' Shaded roadway links are outside the radius of influene. Signifiane level is 5%.
Exhibit 18 Projet Traffi Assignment- Test 2 Assign Test 2 13-13 8-13-14.xlsx 8/13/214 Page 6 of 1 PM Peak Hour Total LOSE 6th Street N 14th Avenue N Avoado Boulevard Coonut Boulevard Crestwood Boulevard
Exhibit 18 Projet Traffi Assignment- Test 2 Assignlest2 13-13 8-13-14.xlsx 8'13/214 Pdge7of1 PM Peak Hour Northlake Boulevard Okeehobee Boulevard
Exhibit 18 Projet Traffi Assignment- Test 2 Assign lest" 1113 81314.xlsx 8/13/214 Page 8 oi 1 PM Peak Hour Orange Boulevard Orange Grove Boulevard I 44th Plae Persimmon Boulevard Royal Palm Beah Blvd
Exhibit 18 Projet Traffi Assignment- Test 2 Assign lpst 2 13-13 8-13-14.xlsx 8/13/]14 Page 9 oi 1 PM Peak Hour Southern Boulevard SR 7