The Top 10 Human Research Protection Compliance Risks

Similar documents
Institutional Responsibilities Under A Federalwide Assurance

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW OF RESEARCH

OHRP Guidance on Written IRB Procedures

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW AND REAPPROVAL OF RESEARCH

NONCOMPLIANCE. 1. Overview

Wayne State University Institutional Review Board

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES

Chapter 4 Institutional Review Board (IRB) Roles and Authorities

Florida State University IRB Standard Operational Procedures

IRB Minutes Quality Improvement Assessment

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURES FOR FULL BOARD REVIEW

UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA Institutional Review Board

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES

Institutional Review Board (IRB) Non-affiliated Member Nomination

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD MANUAL: PURPOSE and POLICIES.

Issue in IRB Approvals:

Independent Ethics Committees

IRB MEETING ADMINISTRATION

SOP 801: Investigator Qualifications and Responsibilities

CONTINUING REVIEW OF APPROVED IRB PROTOCOLS

CONTINUING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR RENEWAL

CONTINUING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR RENEWAL

Lapse in IRB Approval

Ceded IRB Review. The project involves prisoners or other vulnerable populations that require special considerations.

Review of Research by the Convened IRB

University of Iowa External/Central IRB Reliance Process Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

2.0 Institutional Review Board

Standard Operating Policy and Procedures (SOPP) 3:

USC Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

Human Research Protection Program Policy

Supersedes Document Dated: 7/7/11. SOP: RR 401 Version No.: 07 Version Date: 9/8/15 EXPEDITED REVIEW 1. POLICY

21 CFR Part 56 - Institutional Review Boards

Research Involving Human Subjects: AA 110.7

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Reporting an Unanticipated Problem Involving Risks to Subjects or Others (UPIRTSO) to the IRB

Yale University Human Research Protection Program

Guidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors IRB Continuing Review after Clinical Investigation Approval

SOP Institutional Review Board (IRB) Appointments and Membership

DOCUMENTATION OF IRB DISCUSSIONS AND DECISIONS ( IRB MINUTES)

Ceded IRB Review. The University of Arizona has standing agreements in place for the following entities regarding ceded IRB review:

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES 02 06/30/10 08/01/07 1 OF 6

AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE

SOP 5.06 Full Committee Review: Initial IRB Review

To assure knowledge and compliance by documenting the annual administrative review and continuing IRB review of non-exempt projects for the IRB.

IRB Chair Responsibilities

Signature Date Date First Effective: Signature Date Revision Date:

SOP 407: PROTOCOL DEVIATIONS AND UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS

Tuesday, May 15, Please be sure to sign in and take copies of each handout.

To assure knowledge and compliance by documenting the continuing review procedure of approved projects for the IRB.

Institutional Review Board - Restriction s Impo sed

Institutional Review Board (IRB) Policies and Procedures Manual

Collaborative Research

Your Roadmap to Single IRB Review Serving as a Reviewing IRB

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Continuing Review of Approved Research

University of Wisconsin Colleges Administrative Policy #56 NON-COMPLIANCE IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

The Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures. Cooperative Agreements

IV. Basic Procedures for Human Research Protections

(y9. &i?r, JUL t Certified-Return Receipt Requested WARNING LE7TER

CONTINUING REVIEW 3/7/2016

IRB COMPOSITION AND IRB MEMBER ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Yale University Institutional Review Boards

Jeffrey A. Cooper, MD, MMM Huron Consulting Group

EXPEDITED REVIEW. Terms used in this policy, but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Glossary.

What s New in GCP? FDA, OHRP Issue Harmonized Guidance on Transferring IRB Oversight of Clinical Studies

FDA > CDRH > CFR Title 21 Database Search. Registration Listing Adverse Events Advisory Committees. 21 CFR Part 56

Choose the quarter in which the submission was reviewed and approved: Please provide the following information about the minutes being reivewed:

IRB MEETING ADMINISTRATION

Effective Date Revisions Date Review by the Convened Institutional Review Board

SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

Minot State University Institutional Review Board ANNUAL UPDATE/REVISION/PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT

Michigan State University Human Research Protection Program

Administrative Hold, Suspension, or Termination of IRB Approval

Harford Community College. Institutional Review Board Charter and Standard Operating Procedures

IRB Policy Number: 202 Version Number: 6.0 Effective Date: October 16, 2017 Title: Initial Review of Research Involving Human Participants

IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Institutional Review Board. Policy on IRB Review of Protocol Deviations and Noncompliance for Non-exempt Research

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures. IRB Review Processes

SOP 903: HRPP AND NON-COMPLIANCE

POLICY NO EXEMPT RESEARCH... 4 POLICY NO DISCLOSURE OF RESEARCH LAB TEST RESULTS... 5

Tarleton State University

2 Institutional Review Board

Humanitarian Use Devices Made Simple

University of Kentucky Office of Research Integrity and Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedures SOP #4-1 Revision #6

Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedure. Suspension and Termination of IRB Approval

CUNY HRPP Policy: Suspension or Termination of Human Subject Research

the HRPP Director will prepare a draft report within three (3) workdays after the IRB meeting at which the determination occurred.

Centralized IRB Models

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD POLICY

Human Subjects in Research Review and Monitoring Form. Not applicable

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: Penn as Central IRB FAQ

Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Presented by Alena Filip IRB Coordinator Office of Research San Jose State University

IRB-REQUIRED INVESTIGATOR ACTIONS

IRB Authorization Agreement Implementation Checklist and Documentation Tool

Human Research Protections Program Medical College of Wisconsin and Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital

COMPLIANCE MONITORING

IRB MEMBERSHIP COMPOSITION, ROLES AND RESPONSIBILIES

HSPP Standard Operating Procedures

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN S E RVICES, 'mgr,':~~ MAY WARNING LETTE R

SMART IRB Agreement Implementation Checklist and Documentation Tool

Policies & Standard Operating Procedures

Transcription:

The Top 10 Human Research Protection Compliance Risks Health Care Compliance Association Research Compliance Conference Kristina Borror, Ph.D. Director, Division of Compliance Oversight June 2, 2015 1 Overview OHRP Overview Top 10 Human Research Protection Compliance Risks OHRP Compliance Data Common Findings How to Protect Your Institution 2 1

OHRP Overview 3 What is the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP)? Provides leadership in protection of rights, welfare, and wellbeing of subjects involved in research conducted or supported by US Department of Health and Human Services Provides clarification and guidance Develops educational programs and materials Maintains regulatory oversight Provides advice on ethical and regulatory issues pertaining to biomedical and behavioral research 4 2

Federal Regulation and Policy HHS regulations: Title 45 CFR part 46 Subpart A basic HHS Policy IRB & informed consent requirements The Common Rule - Federal Policy Other Federal Departments & Agencies have adopted Departments of Agriculture, Energy, Commerce, HUD, Justice, Defense, Education, Veterans Affairs, Transportation, HHS & Homeland Security; NSF, NASA, EPA, AID, CIA, and the Consumer Product Safety Commission 5 Additional HHS Protections Subpart B - Pregnant Women, Human Fetuses, and Neonates Subpart C - Prisoners Subpart D Children Subpart E IRB Registration 6 3

Determining Applicability of Regulations Prerequisite: Research involving human subjects conducted or supported by HHS (or other Federal Departments or Agencies) that is not otherwise exempt Non-exempt human subject research covered by Assurance of Compliance OR 7 Top 10 Compliance Risks 8 4

Top 10 Compliance Risks Inadequate IRB staff and resources Inadequate IRB documentation Failure to conduct auditing Inadequate written procedures Inappropriate IRB reporting lines Inadequate communication Inadequate resources for researchers Insufficient support from leadership Inadequate education Failure to utilize regulatory flexibility 9 Inadequate IRB staff and resources 10 5

Inadequate IRB staff and resources-findings OHRP found that X institution does not have sufficient staff to ensure that all IRB review and recordkeeping duties are completed. OHRP finds that the X IRB administrative staff lacks sufficient space to conduct IRB duties. 11 What Kind of Resources Do IRBs Need? Sufficient number of professional and administrative staff to handle workload Sufficient meeting and file storage space 12 6

Inadequate IRB documentation 13 Inadequate IRB documentation- Examples IRB-like records maintained by X institution are limited to copies of IRB minutes and protocol notebooks containing only the most current copies of IRB approved protocolrelated documents... The IRB files failed to document a complete history of protocol activities. Minutes of IRB meetings fail to include all required information 14 7

Recording-Keeping Requirements Copies of research proposals reviewed scientific evaluations, if any approved sample consent documents progress reports submitted by investigator reports of injuries to subjects 46.115(a)(1) 15 IRB Records (cont d) IRB meeting minutes Records of continuing review activities Correspondence between IRB and PIs List of IRB members Written IRB procedures Statement of significant new findings provided to subjects 46.115(a)(2-7) 16 8

Failure to conduct auditing 17 Regulatory Requirement The procedures which the IRB will follow for determining which projects need verification from sources other than the investigators that no material changes have occurred since previous IRB review. 46.103(b)(4) 18 9

Some Criteria for Auditing Randomly selected projects; Complex projects involving unusual levels or types of risk to subjects; Projects conducted by investigators who previously have failed to comply with the requirements of the HHS regulations or the IRB; Projects where concerns have been raised based upon information provided in continuing review reports or from other sources). 19 Types of Auditing to Consider Audit research studies (Is the protocol being followed? Are subjects given adequate information during consent?) Audit IRB operations (Are IRB determination appropriate? Are protocols reviewed in a timely manner?) 20 10

Inadequate written procedures 21 Regulatory Requirements for Written Procedures Procedures IRB will follow for: Conducting initial and continuing review of research Reporting its findings and actions to the investigator and the institution determining which projects: require review more often than annually need verification that no material changes have occurred 46.103(b)(4) 22 11

Regulatory Requirements for Written Procedures (cont d) Procedures IRB will follow for: Ensuring prompt reporting to the IRB of proposed changes in a research activity and ensuring that such changes in approved research may not be initiated without IRB review and approval except when necessary to eliminate apparent immediate hazards to the subject 46.103(b)(4) 23 Regulatory Requirements for Written Procedures (cont d) Procedures IRB will follow for: Ensuring prompt reporting to the IRB, appropriate institutional officials, the Dep t or Agency head, and OHRP of any unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or others any serious or continuing noncompliance any suspension or termination of IRB approval 46.103(a) and 46.103(b)(5) 24 12

Inappropriate IRB reporting lines 25 Potential Conflict of Interest IRB reports to Director of Sponsored Research SO interference with IRB s proper execution of responsibilities SO not authorized to act for institution in matters re HSP SO fails to assume obligations imposed by regs re HSP 26 13

Inadequate communication 27 Communication Lines Between IRB and investigator Between IRB and institutional officials Between IRB staff and IRB members Between institution and funding agency Between institution and federal regulatory agency 28 14

Improving Communication Make SOPs and forms user-friendly Automatic reminders for deadlines Have regular meetings between offices/departments Cross-pollination Formal training in negotiation skills and conflict resolution Always be respectful 29 Inadequate resources for researchers 30 15

What Resources to Researchers Need? Adequate Time Space Staff Money Equipment Training To conduct human subjects research 31 Insufficient support from leadership 32 16

Culture of Responsibility Human subjects protections is a shared responsibility: IRBs Investigators Subjects Sponsors Institutional officials All have a role in ensuring subjects are protected and risks are minimized. 33 Inadequate education 34 17

Education Necessary For: IRB members and staff Investigators Subjects Institutional officials Others? 35 Failure to utilize regulatory flexibility 36 18

What are some sources of flexibility in the regulations? Extent of Federalwide Assurance Required review of human subjects research Exemptions Expedited review Waiver or alteration of informed consent Waiver of documentation of informed consent Cooperative research review arrangements 37 What s the Risk of Not Utilizing Flexibility? IRBs and investigators get bogged down in unnecessary procedures Everyone is overworked Real problems can slip through the cracks Problems more likely to be overlooked 38 19

6 4 2 0 OHRP Compliance Data 39 OHRP Compliance Oversight New Cases Initiated 1990-2014 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 90 93 96 99 O2 O5 O8 11 14 Year New Cases 20

OHRP Compliance Oversight Site Visits 1990-2013 6 5 4 3 2 Site Visits 1 0 90 93 96 99 O2 O5 O8 11 14 Year Common OHRP Findings of Noncompliance 42 21

Common Areas of Noncompliance- -Reference Recent Compliance Oversight Determinations-- 2-4-2009 http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/compliance/findings/index.html Determination letters: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/compliance/letters/index.html Borror et al, A Review of OHRP Compliance Oversight Letters. IRB: Ethics and Human Research. Sept-Oct 2003; Vol 25 No 5: 1-4. Weil et al, OHRP Compliance Oversight Letters: An Update IRB: Ethics and Human Research. March-April 2010 Vol 32 No 2: 1-6. Most Common Findings (1) ICDs deficient with respect to basic elements [45 CFR 46.116(a)] Inadequate written procedures [45 CFR 46.103(a) and 46 103(b)(4)(5)] Research conducted without IRB approval [45 CFR 46.103(b) and 46.109(a)] Insufficient info to make determinations required for approval [45 CFR 46.111] Failure to document informed consent [45 CFR 46.117(a)] Failure of IRB to make and document required findings for waiver of informed consent [45 CFR 46.117(c)] 22

Most Common Findings (2) Protocol changes without IRB review [45 CFR 46.103(b)(4)(iii)] Failure to conduct continuing review at least annually [45 CFR 46.109(e)] Inappropriate application of exempt categories of research [45 CFR 46.101(b)] Failure to obtain legally effective informed consent [45 CFR 46.116] Enrollment procedures did not minimize possibility of coercion or undue influence [45 CFR 46.116] Most Common Findings (3) Failure of IRB to Determine That Criteria for IRB Approval Are Satisfied [45 CFR 46.111] Failure of IRB to Document Consideration of Additional Safeguards for Vulnerable Subjects Failure of IRB to Make Required Findings When Reviewing Research Involving Prisoners [45 CFR 46.305] Inadequate IRB meeting minutes and retention of IRB records [45 CFR 46.115(a)] IRB meeting convened without quorum (lack of a majority) [45 CFR 46.108] 23

How to Protect Your Institution 47 Solutions to Correct/Prevent Noncompliance Education Adequate IRB staff and resources Adequate IRB documentation (in particular, adequate minutes of IRB meetings) Periodic self-assessment of institutional system for protecting human subjects Adequate written procedures Utilize the flexibility in the regulations Culture of conscience 24

OHRP Education Resources Research Community Fora Speaking invitations OHRP website -- http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/ OHRP Email Box -- ohrp@hhs.gov Quality Assessment Program Training videos and other materials http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/education/training /ded_video.html OHRP Quality Improvement (QI) Resources Quality Assurance (QA) Self- Assessment Tool http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/education/ qip/ohrp_ded_qatool.html QI Consultation QA Workshops 25

OHRP Contact Information OHRP website: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/ OHRP telephone: 1-866-447-4777 OHRP e-mail: ohrp@hhs.gov 51 Key Points Document everything Education is paramount Communicate early and often (and respectfully) Audit/monitor IRB procedures and worrisome investigators/research Utilize the flexibility at your disposal 52 26

for protecting Human Subjects! 53 27