STRAVA - DATA ACCESS AND USES. March 9, 2016 Shaun Davis + Dewayne Carver Florida Dept. of Transportation

Similar documents
Bicycle and Pedestrian Level of Service Evaluation

Complete Streets and Context Classification

Do As I Say Not As I Do: Observed Compliance vs. Stated Understanding of Pedestrian Crossing Laws in Florida

95 Express Annual Operations Report: Fiscal Year

South Florida Commuter Travel Survey Summary and Preliminary Results. Southeast Florida FSUTMS User Group Meeting June 1, 2012

Marin County. Nonmotorized Transportation Pilot Program. Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts Update

LANE ELIMINATION PROJECTS

FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

US 41 COMPLETE STREETS CORRIDOR PLANNING STUDY from University Parkway to Whitfield Avenue

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

List of Exhibits...ii

Traffic Impact Statement

MONROE COUNTY NEW YORK

APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

We support several of Regional Municipality of Durham Transportation Master Plan Directions such as

Overview of Pinellas County Pedestrian Safety Programs and Initiatives

Overview of FDOT District 7 Safety Programs and Initiatives in Tampa Bay, FL

Plant City Walk-Bike Plan

Space Coast Transportation Planning Organization. Agenda

Safety Emphasis Areas & Safety Project Development Florida Department of Transportation District Seven Tampa Bay

Overview. Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation. What is a Complete Street? And why build them? And why build them?

US 1 Express Lanes Public Kick-Off Meeting

US 81 CORRIDOR STUDY FROM NORTH OF UNION CITY SOUTH TO SH 19 SOUTH OF CHICKASHA CANADIAN AND GRADY COUNTIES, OKLAHOMA JULY 2007

REGIONAL PRIORITIES Presentation to the Tampa Bay Regional Collaboration Committee September 10, 2012

Pine Hills Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety Study Board of County Commissioners Work Session

National Performance Management Measures. April 20, 2016 Webinar

Temporal and Spatial Variation in Non-motorized Traffic in Minneapolis: Some Preliminary Analyses

2017 Census Reporting To access the SOI s Census Reporting web site go to:

SNCC Demographic Trends

Florida DOT Case Study

Chapter 5 DATA COLLECTION FOR TRANSPORTATION SAFETY STUDIES

2015 Florida Main Street Annual Conference. Complete Streets Equal Stronger Main Streets

Planning Study SR 976. Project Advisory Team Meeting May 24, 2017

Travel and Rider Characteristics for Metrobus

TRANSPORTATION FACILITY PLANNING Waugh Chapel Road Maytime Drive to New Market Lane

North Carolina. Bicycle Crash Facts Prepared for

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary

Conducting Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts in Your Community: Count Manager Training. MnDOT and MDH Bicycle and Pedestrian Counting Initiative 2015

2003 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates. Special Locality Report 198

RSA Efforts in the Tampa Bay Area

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

Growing Bicycle Travel & Tourism for Economic Development Jeff Miller, VP North America

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY

Cynemon - Cycling Network Model for London

DKS & WASHINGTON COUNTY Washington County Transportation Survey

Acknowledgements. Ms. Linda Banister Ms. Tracy With Mr. Hassan Shaheen Mr. Scott Johnston

2002 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates. Special Locality Report 209

Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections

Planning Transit Operations and Bike Sharing Denver RTD. Bill Van Meter, Assistant General Manager, Planning March 23, 2012

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Completing the Vision

Transportation Trends, Conditions and Issues. Regional Transportation Plan 2030

Sustainable Transportation Initiatives and Plans in Caledon

GIS for Public Opinion / Survey Research. Timothy Michalowski Senior Statistical GIS Analyst Abt SRBI - New York, NY

Traffic Safety Barriers to Walking and Bicycling Analysis of CA Add-On Responses to the 2009 NHTS

State of the System Report. Agenda. Trends Summary. Corridor Analysis. Safety Analysis

Moving Together Conference Complete Streets from the MassDOT District 5 Perspective

GIS Based Non-Motorized Transportation Planning APA Ohio Statewide Planning Conference. GIS Assisted Non-Motorized Transportation Planning

Route 29 Solutions Projects

2002 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates. Special Locality Report 261

Iowa Corridor Management Pilot Project Overview. Recommendations For A Corridor Management Program August 2004

Compression Study: City, State. City Convention & Visitors Bureau. Prepared for

BEAR CREEK PARK AND RIDE

Bike Routes Assessment: 95 Ave, 106 St & 40 Ave. Replace with appropriate image in View > Master.

North Augusta 1215 Knox Avenue, North Augusta, SC 29841

FDOT Bicycle/Pedestrian Focused Initiative & Complete Streets

Summary of Travel Trends Findings from the 2017 NHTS. Nancy McGuckin, Travel Behavior Analyst Anthony Fucci, Westat

Access Management Regulations and Standards

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

Access Management Regulations and Standards

Basketball Entry Form Instructions

Report. Typical Sections. City of Middleton, WI

Highway 12 Safety Coalition

Saturday 12:00 p.m 2:00 p.m Bicycle Pedestrian

Thank you for this opportunity to discuss with you how we can work together to make our streets more complete.

95 th Street Corridor Transportation Plan. Steering Committee Meeting

Design Traffic Technical Memorandum

City of Charlottesville Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

New Data for Vermont and our Communities: A Focus on Programs of the U.S. Census Bureau Town Officer Education Seminars uvm.

Measuring and growing active modes of transport in Auckland

Creating Complete Streets to Accommodate All Users

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)

Exploring the relationship between Strava cyclists and all cyclists*.

2010 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates. Special Locality Report 172

MAKE YOUR PLACE IN CHANNELSIDE

Real-Life Cost of Incomplete Streets

2005 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates. Special Locality Report 324

Executive Summary. TUCSON TRANSIT ON BOARD ORIGIN AND DESTINATION SURVEY Conducted October City of Tucson Department of Transportation

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

Mile Marker Signs and the. David DiNocco Transportation Planner Massachusetts Department of Transportation

Introduction to Sugar Access. Sugar Access - Measuring Accessibility (Robert Kohler, Citilabs) Slide 1 of 21

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

2016 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates

National Bicycle and Pedestrian Documentation Project Conducting Counts

Traffic Collision Statistics Report

Washington County, Oregon

2014 QUICK FACTS ILLINOIS CRASH INFORMATION. Illinois Emergency Medical Services for Children February 2016 Edition

Transcription:

STRAVA - DATA ACCESS AND USES March 9, 2016 Shaun Davis + Dewayne Carver Florida Dept. of Transportation

AGENDA Training Accessing the Data Data Characteristics Potential Uses Question and Answer

WHAT IS STRAVA? Strava Wide coverage Segment of population In Person Surveys Multi-site coverage Segment of population Count Sites Narrow coverage Entire population

TARGET AUDIENCE

DATA ACCESS Who Governments and their contractors Where FDOT Unified Basemap Repository FDOT Staff http://webapp01.dot.state.fl.us/unifiedbasemaprepository/ Consultants / Contractors and Local Governments - https://www3.dot.state.fl.us/unifiedbasemaprepository/ Strava Heat Map http://labs.strava.com/heatmap/

EXTERNAL ACCESS TO REPOSITORY

CONTRACTOR ACCESS TO REPOSITORY

CREATING A REPOSITORY ACCOUNT

REPOSITORY ERROR MESSAGE Send an email to CO-UBRAdmin@dot.state.fl.us to request authorization

LEGAL REQUIREMENTS Data is proprietary Exempt from public records disclosure Working on public products Accessing Data Requires accepting user agreement Data must come from FDOT Metadata Credits Data Licensed from Strava (user license term 3.2)

DATA CHARACTERISTICS Summaries (segment and intersection) Yearly Total Weekday / Weekend Monthly Weekday / Weekend Seasonal Weekday / Weekend Raw Data (above + origin / destination) Minute scale for each segment and intersection Trip level for origin / destination

STREET NETWORK HERE NAVSTREETS 1.7 million street segments for entire state Available through the UBR Attributes Linked through LINK_ID (HERE) / ID (Strava) fields Street Name / Alternate Street Names Functional classification (not FDOT / FHWA) Travel Direction Speed Category Urban / Rural Divided / Undivided Licensed product

RIDE DATA CHARACTERISTICS 2015 Ride 964,463 activities 14% Commute trips 19 mile median trip 1.5 hour median trip % of Florida Users who provided an age 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% Strava Ride Age Distributions By Gender 0% Under 25 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 Male Female

RUN DATA CHARACTERISTICS 2015 Run 507,388 activities 3.2 mile median trip 37 minute median trip % of Florida Users who provided an age 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Strava Run Age Distributions By Gender Under 25 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 Male Female

UNDERSTANDING THE FILE NAMES Edge = Street Segment Node = Intersection Rollup = Summary Season = On Season Strava default is April 1 through October 1 Fl_edges_2015_ride_rollup_month_2015 _1_weekday = Ride summary for street segments from January 1 st to 31 st 2015

DECODING THE FIELD NAMES ATH = Athlete ACT = Activities or Trips R = Reverse the line digitized direction A = With the line digitized direction T = Total CNT = Count CMT = Commute _0, _1, etc. = Time Period TATHCNT = Total athlete count for summary period RACTCNT_1 = Total trip count for AM peak (5 AM to 9:59 AM) for the summary period for trips taken against the street digitized direction

COMMUTE FLAG

BIKE VOLUME + CRASHES Early stages of understanding More work / research needed

SAMPLE DATA Dade County Ride - 2014 Trips 29,866,103 total trips on 166,000 segments Average 179 trips / segment Max 24,129 trips (Westbound Rickenbacker Causeway) Users Average 44 users / segment Max 2,409 users (Westbound Rickenbacker Causeway)

RICKENBACKER CAUSEWAY

USE BY TIME OF DAY AM Peak (5 AM to 10 AM) PM Peak (3 PM to 8 PM) Late Night (8 PM to Midnight)

INTERSECTION DATA Counts Time Spent at Intersection

ORIGIN / DESTINATION DATA Morning Commute Trips to downtown Miami Evening Commute Trips from downtown Miami Data Characteristics: Census Block Group Record per trip Origin Polygon Destination Polygon Polygon Path

ORIGIN / DESTINATION DATA Negative Flow Positive Flow AM PEAK PM PEAK

DIGITIZED DIRECTION VS. TRAVEL DIRECTION

CELL SIGNAL QUALITY Uses cell towers, not GPS Location accuracy is not exact Trees, buildings and hills can impact quality

USE CASES Measuring relative bike volume Estimating actual bike trips Data needs Limitations Route choice Route characteristics Safety Analysis

TOTAL ACTIVITY COUNT Fewer Trips More Trips

ESTIMATING ACTUAL BIKE TRIPS Data Needs Field Count Time Period Time Scale Count Locations Limitations Market growth Extrapolation Small sample size

50 45 Strava Bike Trips and Observed Bike Trips - District 4 10% A1A - N. of Palmetto Park Rd. - 2013 40 35 5% STRAVA COUNT 30 25 20 15 10 A1A @ Hillsboro Inlet - 2013 A1A @ Hillsboro Inlet - 2012 2.5% A1A - N. of Palmetto Park Rd. - 2012 1% 5 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 FIELD COUNT 2012 2013

30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150 155 160 165 170 175 180 185 190 195 200 205 210 215 220 225 230 235 240 245 250 255 260 265 270 275 280 285 290 295 300 305 310 315 320 325 330 335 340 345 350 355 360 365 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Day of the Year STRAVA GROWTH Counts for Westbound Rickenbacker Causeway ~2.2 X growth from 2012 to 2013 ~1.5 X growth from 2013 to 2014 2014 2013 2012 Number of Trips

DATA CLEANING AND LIMITATIONS Cleaning Removed Trips on Limited Access Facilities Run Commutes Limitations User base Cell signal quality

ACCESS TO PRIOR TRAININGS Training from Strava (August 2015) Overview (Part 1) Product Details (Part 2) Use Cases (Part 3) FDOT Training (November 2015) Follow Up

CONTACT INFO Data Access: FDOT Transportation Statistics Office Chris Francis Chris.Francis@dot.state.fl.us 850-414-4848 Safety: FDOT State Safety Office Shaun Davis Shaun.Davis@dot.state.fl.us 850-414-3100 Design / Planning: FDOT Roadway Design Office Dewayne Carver Dewayne.Carver@dot.state.fl.us 850-414-4310