Craig Rempp, Transit Superintendent Mary Karlsson, Kimley-Horn. Mankato City Council Meeting 6/25/2018

Similar documents
4 Ridership Growth Study

Semi-Annual DC Circulator Forum. February 25, 2014

Arlington County 10-Year Transit Development Plan & Premium Transit Network Briefing. May 2016

TRANSIT & NON-MOTORIZED PLAN DRAFT FINAL REPORT Butte County Association of Governments

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN

TRANSIT RIDERSHIP IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL PROJECTS OPERATING PLANS - NEXT NETWORK TRANSIT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

I-35W Solutions Alliance Project Update July 13, 2017

Rochester Area Bike Sharing Program Study

Transit Workshop with MPO Board

City of Davenport CitiBus Public Transportation Study. April 2015

Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Afeasibility study to evaluate bus rapid transit service in the East-West Corridor connecting major employment and activity centers between downtown

Standing Committee on Policy and Strategic Priorities

MEETING Agenda. Introductions. Project Overview. Key Study Components. Alternative Station Concepts. Preferred Station Concept. Next Steps.

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

Capital and Strategic Planning Committee. Item III - B. April 12, WMATA s Transit-Oriented Development Objectives

Final Study Recommendations AMES TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY. For Public Review and Comment. October Ames Transit Feasibility Study

CASE STUDY City of Monrovia: Leveraging emerging ridesharing services to expand mobility options

Seattle Transit Master Plan

WHITE PAPER: TRANSIT SERVICE FOR SOUTH SHAGANAPPI

Pocatello Regional Transit Master Transit Plan Draft Recommendations

1/30/2019 DRAFT. January 31, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

May 12, 2016 Metro Potential Ballot Measure Issue Brief: Local Return

Integrated Regional Traffic Management. Michael Aherne Technical Director POLIS Conference 2009

Item 5.1 TRANSIT DAY 2018 BUDGET PRESENTATION. Public Works Department TRANSIT

Where We Live and Work Today

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

Business Plan Presentation

Bus Riders of Saskatoon Meeting with City of Saskatoon Utility Services Department October 23, :30pm 2:30pm th Street West, Saskatoon

Everett Transit Action Plan. Community Open House November 16, 2015

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Transit Operations in the I-95 Express Lanes

January 2019 FY Key Performance Report

APPENDIX C. Systems Performance Report C-1

THE NEXUS OF LIVABILITY, TRANSIT, AND PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT

Scottsdale Road/Rural Road Alternatives Analysis (AA) Study. Arizona ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 7, 2012

NEED FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDING

Chicag. go Tra. ansit A. Autho. ority

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Customer Service and Operations Committee. Board Information Item III-A. March 12, 2015

CITY OF HAMILTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Transit Division

NACTO Designing Cities Conference Project Evaluation: Tools for Measuring Success and Building Support. October 29, 2015

Prince George s County Council Retreat January 5, 2017

York Region Population and Employment Growth

CITY OF HAMILTON. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Transportation Division

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

May 2018 FY Key Performance Report

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

Public Consultation Centre For. Transportation Master Plan Update. Information Package

Swift Bus Rapid Transit. June DeVoll, Community Transit & Tom Hingson, Everett Transit

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Sept. 26, 2011

Service Business Plan

DIRECTION REGARDING WEHO PEDALS BIKE SHARE PROGRAM AND DOCKLESS BIKE SHARE PILOT MAYOR PRO TEMPORE JOHN D' AMICO COUNCILMEMBER LAUREN MEISTER

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

TAC February 1, 2012 Prepared by Metro Bike Program

Service Proposal for the City of Ashland, Oregon


Board Strategy Day. January 25, 2018

Transportation in Washoe County. Lee Gibson, Executive Director February 15, 2011

David Jickling, Public Transportation Director Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County

Transportation. Pages E-3 to E-145 PROPOSED FY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) CCCRC Presentation Thursday, June 14, 2018

Title VI Fare Change Equity Analysis

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

US 19 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safe Access to Transit Corridor Study

Capital Metro Monthly Ridership Report September 2017 (Fiscal Year-end 2017)

Spring Lake Park Mounds View North Oaks. Arden Hills. Shoreview. Roseville. Little Canada. Falcon Heights SNELLING. Lilydale. West Saint Paul 35E

University of Leeds Travel Plan

ST. JOHNS GOLF CLUB PHASE II FINDINGS, PHASE III RECOMMENDATION, AND POTENTIAL PARTNERSHIP OPPORTUNITY

CITY OF KINGSTON INFORMATION REPORT TO ENVIRONMENT, INFRASTRUCTURE & TRANSPORTATION POLICIES COMMITTEE Report No.: EITP

September 2018 FY Key Performance Report

Moving Forward Together Plan

Regional Bus Priority

Transportation in 2025

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

MARTA Expansion Update

Transportation Technology and Infrastructure Committee February 13, 2017

Public Event 1 Community Workshops

To secure Council approval for a pilot expansion of Transit service to the villages of St. Davids and Queenston.

SOLTRANS BOARD MEETING SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS / HANDOUTS January 15, 2015 MEETING HANDOUTS

Minnesota Toward Zero Deaths: It's more than just a slogan

Highway 169 Mobility Study Policy Advisory Committee Meeting #4 Meeting Record

Rehabilitating First- and Last- Mile Connections

Mobility Greater Johnson County Transportation Coalition. May 23, 2018

Arnold Hinojosa

Sustainable Campus Transportation in the United States

Title. Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee December 12, Brad Larson Metro District MnDOT

Estimating Ridership of Rural Demand-Response Transit Services for the General Public

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

Northern California Golf Association & Poppy Holding, Inc. Five Year Strategic Plan June 1, 2007 December 31, 2011

Transit Ridership - Why the Decline and How to Increase. Hosted by the. Virginia Transit Association

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

Community Transportation Plan Acknowledgements

Characteristics from these programs were used to compare to and evaluate existing conditions in Howard County.

POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Community Engagement Process

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

Appendix 1 Transit Network Analysis

Otter Tail County 2040 Transportation Plan. Asset Management Peer Exchange

Transcription:

Craig Rempp, Transit Superintendent Mary Karlsson, Kimley-Horn Mankato City Council Meeting 6/25/2018

What is a Transit Development Plan (TDP)? Engagement Issues Goals, objectives, design guidelines and standards Service Capital improvements Customer communications Organization and staffing Financial plan

Mankato TDP Purpose Support continued ridership growth Identify opportunities for continued improvement Approach Community-based, leveraging extensive engagement process and techniques

Service Area Profile (2017) 24 square miles 19 fixed route services 9 Citywide 10 University (Sept-May only) 28,850* (2016) Paratransit service Notable employment and activity centers Taylor Corporation Mayo Clinic-Mankato River Hills Mall Area Minnesota State University Mankato Campus (MSU-Mankato) City Center Area

Community Engagement

System Needs and Issues

System and Service Evaluation Service evaluation tied to Goals, Objectives, and Design Guidelines Ridership, Service Effectiveness, Cost Efficiency, and Service Quality Lessons learned Residents use the service even though less service is offered compared to peer agencies Mankato Transit System (MTS) should explore additional funding revenue sources and partnerships to expand service Mankato Strategic Plan

Goals, Objectives, and Transit System Design Guidelines Reflect community s vision for future transit Reflects local, regional, state, and federal policy

Service Recommendations Three scenarios Cost neutral New service expansion Illustrative Designed around available funding

New Service Expansion and Illustrative Plan Benefits Benefit More days of the week More trips per hour Fixed Route Mobility Bus Flex Zone New On demand New More hours New More places New More population access More job access New New 6,300 8,400 Additional Population Served 2,700-5,100 Additional Jobs Served 19-25% Population Increase 9-17% Job Increase

New Service Expansion Plan Benefits Benefit More days of the week Value Eagle Lake and Mobility Bus Sunday Service More trips per hour Increase Frequency on Route 7 More hours More places Longer Service Span on Routes 7; Route 5; Mobility Bus Eagle Lake; Flex Route (Old Town, Sibley Park, East Mankato, West Mankato, North Mankato, Germania Park, Tourtelloutte Park, south of MSU); Mobility Bus More population access 6,300 (+19%) More job access 2,700 (+9%)

Illustrative Plan Benefits Benefit Value More days of the week Add Service on Routes: 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 More trips per hour More hours More places Increase Frequency on Routes: 2, 6, 1B-North; Flex Zone Longer Service Span on Routes: 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, Mobility Bus Circulator services to West Mankato, Germania Park and Mankato East Senior High School More population access 8,400 (+25%) More job access 5,100 (+17%)

Capital Assets Blueprint to maintain a safe and reliable fleet, customer facilities, and support facilities Existing and future capital assets Vehicles, facilities, other infrastructure Future transit hub/center Mankato Strategic Plan Reflects Transit Asset Management Plan

What is a Transit Asset Management Plan? Separate plan required by federal government for transit agencies receiving federal funding Must adopt by October 2018 Must update at least every four years (e.g., update by Oct 2022) Facilities Customer and support facilities Vehicles Transit Asset Management Plan Equipment Snowblowers, radios, fare collection, etc.

Transit Marketing and Communications A toolbox for MTS to jumpstart efforts: System branding Map and schedule materials Online materials Communication and feedback channels New media and technologies

Organizational and Staffing Plan Safely and reliably operate and maintain the system

Financial Plan Considers operating and capital needs to build a baseline forecast MTS will have $1 million to $1.25 million per year in funding for service expansion and capital investments Established on baseline forecast, two scenarios Expansion and Illustrative were built Expansion scenario net positive on balance, surplus revenue available to help to cover growing capital needs Illustrative scenario net negative on balance, additional $2.7 to $3.4 million needed to implement

Financial Plan 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Operating Expenses (Baseline) Existing Fixed-Route Service $2,886 $2,973 $3,062 $3,154 $3,248 $3,346 $3,446 $3,550 $3,656 $3,766 Paratransit $320 $330 $340 $350 $360 $371 $382 $394 $406 $418 Expenses Total $3,206 $3,303 $3,402 $3,504 $3,609 $3,717 $3,829 $3,944 $4,062 $4,184 Operating Revenue (Baseline) FTA Funding Carryover Balance $676 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $871 New Funding (Operations) $889 $907 $925 $943 $962 $981 $1,001 $1,021 $1,041 MnDOT Fixed Route - Existing $1,700 $1,751 $1,874 $1,930 $1,988 $2,048 $2,109 $2,172 $2,238 $2,305 Fixed Route - Expansion $498 $970 $800 $824 $848 $874 $900 $927 $955 Paratransit $222 $228 $239 $246 $254 $261 $269 $277 $286 $294 Local Funding City of Mankato $160 $165 $170 $175 $180 $185 $191 $197 $203 $209 City of North Mankato $9 $9 $9 $10 $10 $10 $11 $11 $11 $12 Fare and MSU Contributions $45 MSU $46 $48 $49 $51 $52 $54 $55 $57 $59 Farebox Revenue $556 $573 $486 $501 $516 $532 $548 $564 $581 $598 Non-Farebox Revenue $33 $33 $33 $33 $33 $33 $33 $33 $33 $33 Revenue Total $4,769 $4,664 $4,565 $4,692 $4,823 $4,957 $5,095 $5,237 $5,384 $5,534 Capital (Baseline) State of Good Repair Expenses $223 $554 $646 $312 $1,027 $384 $1,155 $1,074 $1,167 $883 MNDOT Capital Funding $1,801 $443 $517 $249 $821 $307 $924 $859 $934 $706 Baseline Surplus Available for Capital and New Service Expansion $3,141 $1,251 $1,035 $1,126 $1,009 $1,163 $1,036 $1,079 $1,088 $1,174

Financial Plan: New Service Expansion New Service Expansion 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Operating $4,113 $4,236 $4,363 $4,494 $4,629 $4,768 $4,911 $5,058 $5,210 $5,366 Costs Capital $1,229 $907 $646 $468 $1,027 $384 $1,155 $1,074 $1,303 $1,188 Sub-Total $5,342 $5,143 $5,009 $4,962 $5,656 $5,151 $6,066 $6,132 $6,512 $6,554 Revenue Sub-Total $6,570 $5,389 $5,082 $5,067 $5,644 $5,264 $6,020 $6,096 $6,426 $6,484 Annual Balance (Non-Cumulative)* $1,229 $247 $73 $105 -$11 $113 -$47 -$35 -$87 -$70 Notes: *Positive balance may be subject to repayment to MnDOT

Financial Plan: Illustrative Illustrative 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Operating $6,673 $6,873 $7,079 $7,291 $7,510 $7,735 $7,967 $8,206 $8,453 $8,706 Costs Capital $2,577 $1,235 $646 $469 $1,108 $384 $1,182 $2,324 $1,660 $1,188 Sub-Total $9,249 $8,108 $7,725 $7,760 $8,618 $8,119 $9,149 $10,531 $10,113 $9,894 Revenue Sub-Total $6,570 $5,652 $5,082 $5,067 $5,710 $5,264 $6,041 $7,097 $6,712 $6,484 Annual Balance (Non-Cumulative) -$2,679 -$2,456 -$2,643 -$2,693 -$2,909 -$2,855 -$3,108 -$3,434 -$3,401 -$3,410

How to work from New Service Expansion toward Illustrative Scenario? Increase span of service on key routes to 10 pm Route 2 Downtown-MSU Route 3 Downtown-Mall Route 5 Downtown-N Mankato Route 6 MSU-Mall Route 7 Old Town-MSU Cost of longer span is $741,120 annually Subject to 80/20 cost-sharing (MnDOT/local)

Next Steps and Timeline Today -- proposed actions Adopt Transit Development Plan (TDP) Adopt Transit Asset Management Plan (TAM) Q3-2018 Implement New Service Expansion Plan Update Transit Asset Management Plan every four years Adopt next update by June 2022 Update TDP every five years Adopt next update by June 2023

Questions and Discussion