Undeveloped Zoning Inventory February 2004

Similar documents
TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

CCoWS. Central Coast Watershed Studies. Summary of Precipitation and Streamflow for Potrero and San Clemente Creeks in 2010

Oakmont Area Structure Plan

Minimum Bid: $4, Legal Description: DESCHUTES RIVER RECREATION HOMESITES UNIT 6, PART II, Lot 12, Block 79.

Minimum Bid: $7, Legal Description: DESCHUTES RIVER RECREATION HOMESITES, INC. UNIT 5; Lot 38; Block 27

September 2017 MLS Statistical Report. Residential Inventory

Progress Report on the Design and Planning of an Infrastructure Improvement Project for the Sunnyside TIF District (Phase II)

County of Orange Resources and Development Management Department Harbors, Beaches and Parks. Strategic Plan. HBP Strategic Plan Workshop 1.

Planning & Zoning Commission

Bluetongue Disease (BT)

Wetland Training Institute: 2018 Calendar of Courses

GALLUP NEWS SERVICE GALLUP POLL SOCIAL SERIES: WORLD AFFAIRS

Lower Coquitlam River Project Water Use Plan. Temperature Monitoring Lower Coquitlam River Project Year 2 Report

GALLUP NEWS SERVICE GALLUP POLL SOCIAL SERIES: WORLD AFFAIRS

GALLUP NEWS SERVICE GALLUP POLL SOCIAL SERIES: WORK AND EDUCATION

DISCLAIMER FOR ALL CITY OF KISSIMMEE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATIONS

Technical Report Culvert A Hydraulic Analysis

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA

CUPSIM Water Supply Variability Study All information subject to change.

BULL CREEK RANCH 1,129± acres Osceola County, FL

MEMORANDUM. 1. Modification of Map H to combine the 1.8 acre St. Johns County Courthouse Annex site with lands owned by the Tour as part of the DRI.

Utility Debt Securitization Authority 2013 T/TE Billed Revenues Tracking Report

How did you hear about this meeting?

DISCLAIMER FOR ALL CITY OF KISSIMMEE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATIONS

Wind Resource Assessment for CHEFORNAK, ALASKA


MARKET AND CAPACITY UPDATE. Matthew Marsh September 2016

Winter Drawdown Issues of Concern

Coquitlam/Buntzen Project Water Use Plan

Youngs Creek Hydroelectric Project

Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture Annual Report The Nature Conservancy 2013

NEVADA SLOT MACHINES: HISTORICAL HOLD PERCENTAGE VARIATIONS ANNUAL AND MONTHLY HOLD PERCENTAGES, CENTER FOR GAMING RESEARCH, NOVEMBER 2017

Kodiak, Alaska Site 1 Wind Resource Report

INNCOM SYSTEM MONITORING MARRIOT HOTEL DOWNTOWN PHILADELPHIA, PA. Report 9. July 2, CH2M HILL Project No

City of Hanover TRANSPORTATION STUDY

Initial Study Report Whitewater Boating

Nexus/Proportionality Study Lakeview Estates Off-Site Walking Route

DISCLAIMER FOR ALL CITY OF KISSIMMEE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATIONS

Chapter 5 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION

City of Santa Cruz Interim Tarplant Management

Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC

2009 Master Plan & Reexamination Report Verona, New Jersey

San Antonio Creek Spreading Grounds Rehabilitation Project Ojai Valley, CA

DISCLAIMER FOR ALL CITY OF KISSIMMEE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATIONS

35.46 ACRES FOR SALE

A G E N D A OKLAHOMA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION. November 16, Approval of Minutes of the Previous Meeting: (October 19, 2006)

2015 Data review. Capturing Ready Lane NEXUS vehicles

Administration Report Fiscal Year 2011/2012

Administration Report Fiscal Year 2010/2011

Overview Open Space and Recreation

Carbondale to Murphysboro Bike Route JACKSON COUNTY

Weather and Climate Impacts on Water Supply

September 9, Planning and Land Development Regulation Commission (PLDRC)

Plan B Dam Breach Assessment

Chapter 2: Alternatives

Discussion on the Selection of the Recommended Fish Passage Design Discharge

Little Spokane River Stream Gage Report: Deadman Creek, Dragoon Creek, and the West Branch of the Little Spokane River

African swine fever in domestic pigs and wild boar (ASF)

APPENDIX J HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY

Analysis of 2015 Trail Usage Patterns along the Great Allegheny Passage

JACKRABBIT DEVELOPMENT

2016 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates

Manufacturers continue capacity expansion as technology orders grow

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Native American Crosscut Funding

Manufacturers Continue Capacity Expansion as Technology Orders Grow

I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Crystal City Civic Association September 21, 2016

For Information Only. Pedestrian Collisions (2011 to 2015) Resolution. Presented: Monday, Apr 18, Report Date Tuesday, Apr 05, 2016

East Downtown Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) No. 15 Infrastructure Assessment Study

REPORT ON RED-LIGHT MONITORING SYSTEMS

Roundabout Feasibility Memorandum

Access Management Regulations and Standards

Preston s Edmond Market Report

Access Management Regulations and Standards for Minor Arterials, Collectors, Local Streets

CITY OF ALPHARETTA DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN TRAFFIC EVALUATION

APPROVED 10 LOT TENTATIVE MAP

Regulatory Impact Analysis Framework for Hawaii Pelagic Fishery Management:

2 History & Geography. 2.1 Geography The Delmarva Peninsula

Analysis Data Sources

3.0 Basin and Watershed Characteristics

MONROE COUNTY NEW YORK

13 August 14, 2013 Public Hearing

PUBLIC MEETINGS. Please see the City of Geneva Public Meeting Guide for more information regarding City Council and Committee of the Whole meetings.

MAR DASHBOARD MAR. Compliant % Breakdown Mar % Late % On-time MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

Groundwater Management Optimization. Dr. Issam NOUIRI

Powder/Tongue River Basin Plan Available Surface Water Determination Task 3D

Estin Report: Summer 2015 Market Snapshot Aspen Snowmass Real Estate

Albeni Falls Dam Downstream Water Temperature Study Interim Results

JAN DASHBOARD. Positive Response Compliance JAN. Compliant Tickets : On-Time Performance Analysis. January % Late.

Staying in Tune with South Florida s Water Cycle for Scientists, Managers, and Policy Makers in 5 Minutes per Week

Wind Resource Assessment for NOME (ANVIL MOUNTAIN), ALASKA Date last modified: 5/22/06 Compiled by: Cliff Dolchok

Drought and the Climate of the Ogallala Aquifer

Site Description: Tower Site

2018 HR & PAYROLL Deadlines

STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF MINING, LAND AND WATER LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION AS

PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN WORKING GROUP MEETING STOCKBRIDGE

Little Athletics NSW. 2018/2019 Season. Age Group Information Handbook / 1

May 2018 MLS Statistical Report

Buoyancy Control Calculated Cost Allowance for 1 Year Study Cost Estimate

Current Hawaii Economic Conditions. Eugene Tian

Transcription:

Undeveloped Zoning Inventory February 2004 Prepared by Planning Department

Undeveloped Zoning Inventory February 2004 Project Description: The Undeveloped Zoning Inventory (the Inventory) is a periodic tabulation of raw land by zoning classification within the existing service area for public utilities. The Inventory was originally limited to residentially zoned land; however, as a result of technological advancements associated with Geographic Information Systems (GIS), it has been expanded to include all zoning classifications. Also as a result of the improved technology, the Inventory now includes some indication of those areas that may be impacted by environmental constraints. This limitation has been estimated through the use of the information regarding the presence of vegetated hydric soils which provides some indication for the potential for wetlands. Project Parameters: In order for a site to be contained in the inventory, it must meet the following requirements: 1. Sites must be either undeveloped (unimproved) or a have an improvement value of less than $20,000 per acre. 2. Sites must be a minimum of 10 acres in size. 3. Sites must be within the City of Chesapeake s Public Utility Franchise Area. The Inventory does not include: Properties known to have an approved preliminary subdivision plat or site plan Future school or park sites Mitigation banks Borrow pits Holdings by the Nature Conservancy or other natural resource agencies State and Federal property Property zoned C-1 or C-2 (Conservation or Recreation) 2

Vegetated Hydric Soils The determination of whether or not wetlands exist on a property is subject to an official determination by the appropriate agencies and can only be definitively determined on a site by site basis. The general criteria for a wetland determination includes the presence of three criteria: 1) hydric soils, 2) hydrophytic vegetation, and 3) wetland hydrology. In an effort to estimate the lands that potentially meet these criteria, areas with hydric soils and areas which have natural vegetation have been mapped. Estimated Unit Yield Per Acre Calculations The calculation of estimated units is based upon typical density ranges provide by the Tidewater Builder s Association and from the Chesapeake Zoning Ordinance. The density ranges that have been used are as follows: Typical Zoning Class Unit Yield per Acre RE-1.33 R-40 1 R-25 1.5 R-15 2 R-12 2.5 R-10 3 R-8 4 R-6 4 R-TH 10 R-MF1 15 3

Results of the Inventory Inventory of Undeveloped Land by Zoning City Wide Totals February 4, 2004 Notes: 1. The results of this inventory conform to the project parameters outlined in the Project Parameters portion of this report. 2. Land designated to have vegetated hydric soils should not be considered to be undevelopable. This designation indicates that there is a likelihood that wetlands may exist on portions of the land given the presence of certain wetland indicators. Actual determinations must be made on a site by site basis. No accounting for the potential for wetland mitigation has been included in this estimate. Zoning District Total Acres Undeveloped Total Acres Undeveloped w/ Vegetated Hydric Soils % w/ Vegetated Hydric Soils A1 5108.9 2030.4 40% AC 14.5 14.5 100% B1 63.3 21.6 34% B2 232.9 88.9 38% B3 194.7 79.6 41% B4 18.5 0.1 1% M1 1158.3 484.2 42% M2 1335.7 281.7 21% M3 391.7 84.9 22% OI 295.7 195.4 66% PUD 617.3 239.6 39% R10 82.9 0.6 1% R10S 584.9 394.1 67% R12AS 61.2 5.3 9% R12S 1.0 1.0 100% R15 91.5 23.5 26% R15S 2125.1 816.1 38% R25AS 11.3 0.0 0% R6 20.8 2.9 14% R8S 82.1 16.8 20% RMF1 159.1 111.9 70% RE1 79.1 9.2 12% TOTALS 12730.6 4902.1 39% 4

5

Link to GIS Map in PDF Format Residential Zoning Summary Estimate of Unit Yield City Wide Totals February 4, 2004 Notes: 1. The results of this inventory conform to the project parameters outlined in the Project Parameters portion of this report. 2. Land designated to have vegetated hydric soils should not be considered to be undevelopable. This designation indicates that there is a likelihood that wetlands may exist on portions of the land given the presences of certain wetland indicators. Actual determinations must be made on a site by site basis. No accounting for the potential for wetland mitigation has been included in this estimate. Zoning District Total Acres Undevel Total Acres Undeveloped w/ Vegetated Hydric Soils % w/ Vegetated Hydric Soils Acres with No Potential Wetland Impact Typical Unit Yield per Acre Max Unit Yield (from Total Acres) Min Unit Yield (from No Impact Areas Only) R10 82.9 0.6 1% 82.3 3 249 247 R10S 584.9 394.1 67% 190.8 3 1755 572 R12AS 61.2 5.3 9% 55.9 2.5 153 140 R12S 1.0 1.0 100% 0.0 2.5 2 0 R15 91.5 23.5 26% 68.0 2 183 136 R15S 2125.1 816.1 38% 1309.0 2 4250 2618 R25AS 11.3 0.0 0% 11.3 1.5 17 17 R6 20.8 2.9 14% 17.9 4 83 72 R8S 82.1 16.8 20% 65.3 4 328 261 RMF1 159.1 111.9 70% 47.3 15 2387 709 RE1 79.1 9.2 12% 70.0 0.33 26 23 TOTALS 3299.1 1381.3 42% 1917.8 9434 4795 Residential Inventory Distribution by Zoning Classification 2% 5% 1% 2% 20% 0% 2% 68% R10 / R10s R12AS / R12s R15 / R15s R25AS R6 R8S RMF1 RE1

Distribution by Planning Area Undeveloped Property Inventory for Chesapeake, Virginia - February 5, 2004 Presented for each Planning Area in Acres by Zoning Classification and in Total Area in Acres Zoning Rivercrest South Norfolk Indian River Southern Chesapeake Western Branch Camelot Deep Creek Great Bridge Greenbrier Total A1 81.9 0.0 0.0 911.8 1394.0 0.0 600.7 556.0 1564.5 5108.9 AC 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.5 B1 0.0 14.2 0.0 0.0 6.4 7.0 1.1 27.3 7.3 63.3 B2 21.6 4.8 0.0 0.0 95.4 11.3 84.8 0.0 14.9 232.9 B3 10.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 46.7 0.0 126.4 194.7 B4 8.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.6 18.5 M1 289.2 0.0 13.2 0.0 38.1 207.2 502.6 92.9 15.1 1158.3 M2 43.7 549.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 397.7 216.1 128.9 1335.7 M3 73.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 252.0 66.3 0.0 391.7 OI 59.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 95.5 0.0 61.2 11.4 68.2 295.7 PUD 25.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 292.2 299.3 617.3 R10 13.1 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.8 58.4 0.0 0.0 82.9 R10S 17.5 0.0 19.1 0.0 62.3 257.0 21.2 43.8 164.0 584.9 R12AS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.6 0.1 48.5 61.2 R12S 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 R15 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.9 0.0 0.0 48.8 9.5 17.3 91.5 R15S 61.9 0.0 0.0 40.8 494.0 0.0 871.2 416.5 240.7 2125.1 R25AS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.3 0.0 0.0 11.3 R6 0.0 5.9 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.8 R8S 20.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 11.4 12.7 37.3 0.0 0.0 82.1 RMF1 70.3 15.2 0.0 0.0 29.5 12.7 0.0 0.0 31.5 159.1 RE1 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.0 0.1 0.0 38.2 19.8 0.0 79.1 TOTALS 797.4 590.7 47.3 1003.9 2226.7 529.5 3045.9 1751.9 2737.2 12730.6

Zoning Rivercrest South Norfolk Indian River Distribution by Planning Area Undeveloped Residential Zoning -- Acres February 4, 2004 Southern Chesapeake Western Branch Camelot Deep Creek Great Bridge Greenbrier Total R10 13.1 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.8 58.4 0.0 0.0 82.9 R10S 17.5 0.0 19.1 0.0 62.3 257.0 21.2 43.8 164.0 584.9 R12AS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.6 0.1 48.5 61.2 R12S 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 R15 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.9 0.0 0.0 48.8 9.5 17.3 91.5 R15S 61.9 0.0 0.0 40.8 494.0 0.0 871.2 416.5 240.7 2125.1 R25AS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.3 0.0 0.0 11.3 R6 0.0 5.9 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.8 R8S 20.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 11.4 12.7 37.3 0.0 0.0 82.1 RMF1 70.3 15.2 0.0 0.0 29.5 12.7 0.0 0.0 31.5 159.1 RE1 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.0 0.1 0.0 38.2 19.8 0.0 79.1 TOTAL 184.2 22.0 34.1 77.6 597.3 293.1 1099.0 489.7 502.1 3299.1 Undeveloped Residential Zoning Typical Unit Yield February 4, 2004 Zoning Density Factor Rivercrest South Norfolk Indian River Southern Chesapeake Western Branch Camelot Deep Creek Great Bridge Greenbrier Total R10 3 39 2 0 0 0 32 175 0 0 249 R10S 3 53 0 57 0 187 771 64 131 492 1755 R12AS 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 121 153 R12S 2.5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 R15 2 0 0 0 32 0 0 98 19 35 183 R15S 2 124 0 0 82 988 0 1742 833 481 4250 R25AS 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 17 R6 4 0 23 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 R8S 4 82 1 0 0 46 51 149 0 0 328 RMF1 15 1054 228 0 0 443 190 0 0 473 2388 RE1 0.33 0 0 0 7 0 0 13 7 0 26 TOTAL 1354 255 117 120 1663 1044 2289 990 1602 9434 Distribution of Residential Inventory by Planning Area 6% 1% 2% 1% 15% 18% 15% 9% 33% Rivercrest South Norfolk Indian River Southern Chesapeake Western Branch Camelot Deep Creek Great Bridge Greenbrier

Historical Results The following table summarizes the total number of residentially zoned acres from past Inventories. Some caution should be exercised in the comparison of past Inventories do to changes in project methodology. The previous Inventories did not use GIS technology and were conducted on paper zoning maps at a scale of 1 inch equals 200 feet. Actual acreage figure were measured using a digital planimeter. Due to the increased margin for human error, it is likely that some properties that were eligible for the Inventory in the past were not included. Other factors that contribute to differences between the Inventories include changes in zoning, development activity, and fluctuations in the limits of the utility service area. Total Acres Zoned for Residential Inventory Date Development Sep-92 6,993 Jul-94 5,956.9 Mar-95 5,558 Sep-95 5,349 May-96 5,090 Mar-97 5,151 Oct-97 4,928 Aug-98 4,783 Dec-99 4,131 Residential Inventory Over Time 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Sep-92 Sep-94 Sep-96 Sep-98 Sep-00 Sep-02 Acres Time