Risk factors associated with pushing and pulling loads

Similar documents
One Direct Manual Handling Guidance

The Management of Hazardous Manual Handling Operations. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations

Safety Services. Local Rules for Safety in Manual Handling Operations

TECHNICAL INFORMATION SHEET 17. Revision 1 : 2016 MODEL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR THE MANUAL HANDLING OF GAS CYLINDERS

Getting to grips with manual handling

Manual Handling Risk Assessment Procedure (HS.1.09)

Getting to grips with manual handling A short guide

Manual handling at work

Health and Safety Services. Safety Guide 37. Manual Handling. Facilities Management Directorate

MANUAL HANDLING CODE OF PRACTICE

HEALTH AND SAFETY GUIDANCE NOTE MANUAL HANDLING

SAFE MANUAL HANDLING OPERATIONS

Health and Safety Manual Handling Risk Assessment

Manual Handling Procedure

2.18 Manual Handling Policy and Procedure Table of Contents

Health & Safety and Employment Law

This guidance note gives simple, practical advice on what can be done to eliminate or reduce the risks.

Manual handling assessment charts (the MAC tool) Introduction DRAFT

Age Concern Hounslow Manual Handling Risk Assessment PART ONE PRELIMINARY RISK ASSESSMENT

Manual handling assessment charts (the MAC tool)

LEAFLET 4 MANUAL HANDLING

MSD Risk Assessment Checklist

BASICS OF MANUAL HANDLING SAMPLE COURSE HANDBOOK. HSM Safety Management

Manual Handling - Theory

Low Medium High Critical Business Impact: X Changes are important, but urgent implementation is not required, incorporate into your existing workflow.

Injury Prevention and Ergonomics Manual Health & Safety

Horizon Care and Education Group Limited MANUAL HANDLING POLICY

1 P a g e. Moving & Handling Procedure. Title: Reference No: Procedure 01. Assistant Chief Officer. Ian Plummer, Health & Safety Manager

ASSESSING AND CONTROLLING MANUAL HANDLING RISK

Manual Handling Policy

Risk Guide: Manual Handling

GUIDELINE for MSD Hazard Control Measures

How volunteer organisations can comply with the model Work Health and Safety Act LEGISLATIVE FACT SHEET SERIES

List 4 Example Of How Manual Handling Risks Can Be Reduced

Safety Toolkit and Short Guide to General Application Regulations 2007 Manual Handling Section. Manual Handling

Material Lift Risk and Hazard Management

Chapter 13: Manual Handling

SAFE WORK PROCEDURE LOCATION WRITTEN BY APPROVED BY DATE CREATED LAST REVISION

Chapter 13: Manual Handling

Arrangements for H&S

Page1. Arrangements for H&S. Issue Date 07/03/2017 Issue 1 Document No: 007 Uncontrolled when copied

Manual Handling October 2014

SETTING THE HANDLE HEIGHT ON THE ROLLATOR

GUIDANCE NOTE 3 SAFE CYLINDER HANDLING AND THE APPLICATION OF THE MANUAL HANDLING OPERATIONS REGULATIONS TO GAS CYLINDERS REVISION 3: 2016

SAMPLE MANUAL HANDLING CODE OF PRACTICE

Control of Vibration at Work

Manual Lifting: The NIOSH Work Practices Guide for Manual Lifting Determining Acceptable Weights of Lift

MSD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION FORM

Manual Handling Risk Assessment In accordance with the Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992

Working at Height. Policy and Procedures. Author: Beth Webster Assistant Safety Advisor. On behalf of School Safety Committee.

Safety Risk Assessment Working at Height: Mobile Tower Scaffold

Risk Services Best Practices Bulletin Food Preparation Presented by Office of the President Risk Services May 2012

Deans, Directors, Heads of Schools and Departments and Research Institute Directors and Managers

Constructive Ideas. Assessing the risk of sprains and strains CI Introduction. Step 1: Identify hazards. What is musculoskeletal injury (MSI)?

Manual Handling Safety Procedure

HEALTH & SAFETY ARRANGEMENTS FOR MANAGEMENT OF WORK AT HEIGHT

Naval Facilities Engineering Command. Ergonomics Risk Assessment for. Dinghy Retrieval and Storage

LONE WORKING HEALTH AND SAFETY GUIDANCE

Manual Tasks Minimum Standard. October, 2014

OFFICE SAFETY ESSENTIALS

Ergonomics: Assessments and Evaluations for Job Improvements. Travis Ellis, CSP, CHMM

Corporate Standard Manual Handling HB#

University College Dublin Machinery/Equipment Risk Assessment Template

RISK ASSESSMENT. Bobcat Skid Steer Loader. Series F & G (incl. S Models) For. SSL Version 2

Air Conditioner Installer Initial work capacity form

WorkWell Consulting Ergonomic Risk Identification & Assessment. Job Title: Equipment Operator III (Sweeper) Elgin Ford #2108 Date: September 17, 2003

Manual handling. Manual Handling Operations Regulations Guidance on Regulations. HSE Books

System-C Tables Handling, Operation & Maintenance Manual

Hazard Identification and Risk Management

Removing Frozen Clips

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Ergonomics Manual handling Part 1: Lifting and carrying

Appointed person Note: It is recommended that you read the Supporting Information page before you read this factsheet.

Safety Training Program Waterfed Pole Safety

Manually Propelled Risk and Hazard Management

Formwork Labourer Initial work capacity form

PARA-BADMINTON WHEELCHAIR DEVELOPMENT

CONTRACTOR SAFETY INDUCTION HANDBOOK

PLANT HAZARD AND EQUIPMENT RISK ASSESSMENT

Hand-Arm Vibration. Sue Hewitt Health and Safety Laboratory.

PLANT HAZARD AND EQUIPMENT RISK ASSESSMENT

NIOSH Equation Outputs: Recommended Weight Limit (RWL): Lifting Index (LI):

Risk Assessment and Manual handling

Your Safety is Important

BUGGY POLICY. Introduction

Title: Plant and Equipment Risk Management Form Issue Date: Review Date: Page Number: 1 of 11

Preventing Musculoskeletal Injuries (MSIs) in Manufacturing

Bricklayer s Labourer Initial work capacity form

The Royal Birkdale Golf Club BUGGY POLICY

MEWP - Boom Note: It is recommended that you read the Supporting Information page before you read this factsheet.

QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

Health Hazards Matrix for common roles in RMG

Road Knowledge for the new and experienced CO RIDER

Mark Dohrmann and Partners Pty Ltd Ergonomics Safety Risk Management

Use of Plasterers Stilts

TRADE AREA: ELECTRICAL INDUSTRY

The purpose of this training is to give field technicians awareness training and guidelines on potential hazards they may encounter in the field.

A Checklist for a Health and Safety Risk Assessment

EMPLOYER - PHYSICAL DEMANDS ANALYSIS Lab Technician

Monash University Academy of Performing Arts Safety Induction

P-2B & MP-2B SERIES POWER TOOL ANALYZER

Transcription:

Risk factors associated with pushing and pulling loads There are a number of risk factors associated with pushing and pulling of loads. To make it easy to remember, it can be broken down to TILE, which stands for Task, Individual, Load and Environment. The following are some risk factors within these categories that could contribute to a pushing and pulling related injury. You should consider these risk factors when carrying out your risk assessments. Task Steep slopes and rough surfaces can increase the amount of force required to push/pull a load. The risk also increases over longer distances and when the frequency of pushing/pulling does not provide sufficient rest/recovery time. Obstacles can create risks by the worker trying to avoid collision. Large amounts of effort to starting or stop the load moving or even to keep it moving. Repetitive pushing and pulling. Position of the hands is comfortable for the worker. The hands are best positioned between the waist and shoulder height. Page 1 of 9

Individual Workers may have different characteristics and capabilities. For example, a tall worker may have to adopt an awkward posture to push a trolley with low handles, while a shorter worker may have difficulty seeing over the load. Individual concerns such as pregnancy may temporarily reduce the amount of force a worker can safely handle. The task may require unusual capability, if this is so think about how and who should carry out the task. Specialised training or instruction maybe needed. This task may pose a risk on those with a physical or mental disability. Load Consider the weight of the load and the weight of the equipment being used by the worker. Ensure the load is not excessive and that it is sufficiently stable for negotiating and slopes, corners or rough surfaces that may be encountered. Plan the route and ensure the worker can safely see over the load. Check if the load and wheeled equipment isn't too bulky for the route. Environment Environmental factors such as temperature, lighting and air currents can increase the risk of pushing/pulling. Hot and humid environments (like a bakery) can lead to the early onset of fatigue. Strong air movements can increase pushing forces and reduce the stability of the load. Page 2 of 9

Very cold environments can also increase the risk. Environments where there is poor or bright lighting can affect the worker's judgement. Floor surfaces that are clean and dry can help reduce the force needed to move a load. Constraints on posture may cause problems for the worker, which could affect the task and injure the worker. Confined spaces and narrow passages/doorways could provoke a tripping/trapping/abrasions injury. In addition to the above there are other factors, which should also be considered: Equipment Ensure that the correct equipment is provided for the task and it is fit for purpose. There should be a maintenance programme and a well promoted fault reporting system. Ensure that the wheels suit the flooring and environment i.e. are the wheels on the device suited to a hot environment or carpets. Handle height in relation to the different users can be a risk factor for their posture, they may find it uncomfortable and/or unable to apply a suitable grip. Lack of good handles can increase the amount of undue effort needed to move the load. If the equipment is without brakes it could be difficult to stop. If it has brakes but the brakes are poor/ineffective this could also make it difficult to stop. Page 3 of 9

Is posture hindered by Personal Protective Equipment, if so is it really needed or can the task be done in a different way? Work organisation and psychosocial factors This effects the workers psychological reaction to work and the environment, such factors as high workload demands, short deadlines and lack of control and working methods. Poor communication with managers and employees can lead to an unhappy workforce and this could have an effect on the production. Organisation change' can have an effect on the workforce, this could effect their motivation if no mechanisms are in place to prevent this. Planning a push/pull risk assessment The questions below are an example of what you should be asking as part of your risk assessment. Try to consider all the questions below before undertaking a pushing and pulling activity and complete a suitable and sufficient risk assessment. Questions on the task Is the route as short as possible? Is the task known to be demanding for employees? That is, do they dislike a particular job or task? Is the route clear of obstacles? Does the task involve negotiating kerbs, steps or slopes? Are there maintenance procedures in place? Does the task need a lot of effort to get the load moving and kept moving? Are there sudden movements to start or stop the load? Are there any one handed operations? Page 4 of 9

Is there movement at high speed or over long distances? Is there repetitive pushing/pulling? Questions on the load How heavy is the laden trolley and how much force is exerted? Is the load stable and secure? Is the load too bulky for the route or trolley? Can you see over the load? Are there good handholds? Questions on the environment Does the task take place in a very hot or cold environment? (Repetitive pushing and pulling activities within hot and humid temperatures can lead to the early onset of fatigue). Does the task take place in windy locations where the load may become unstable? Is the lighting adequate not too dim and not too bright? Are there constraints on body posture/positioning? Are there confined spaces/narrow doorways? Are there surfaces or edges to cause cuts/abrasions/burns to hands or body? Any rutted/damaged/slippery floors? Any trapping or tripping hazards? Page 5 of 9

Questions on individual capabilities Source: Health & Safety Executive Does the worker have a musculoskeletal injury (ache or pain), which might be aggravated? Does the worker have any loose clothing that may get entangled in the device? Does the worker adopt the correct upright posture for the operation? Does the task require unusual capabilities? Does it cause a hazard to those with a health problem or those who are pregnant? Is there a need for special information/training? Questions on the equipment Is your device fit for purpose is the device the correct type for the operation? Is it well maintained and do the wheels and castors rotate freely? Are the wheels on the device suited to the floor surface? E.g. are the wheels large enough to minimise rolling resistance? Is the handle height on your device between your waist and your shoulder height? Are there any brakes? If so, are they effective? Are the handle grips in good order and comfortable? Is movement or posture hindered by clothing or personal protective equipment? Is there an absence of the correct/suitable PPE being worn? Page 6 of 9

If on wheels/castors are they o unsuitable for the type of load? Source: Health & Safety Executive o unsuitable for the floor surface/work environment? o difficult to steer? o easily damaged or defective? o without brakes or difficult to stop? o with brakes, but the brakes are poor/ ineffective? Questions on work organisation and psychosocial factors Do workers feel that there has been a lack of consideration given to the planning and scheduling of tasks/rest breaks? Do workers feel that there is poor communication between management and employees (eg they're not involved in risk assessments or when purchasing equipment)? Are there sudden changes in workload, or seasonal changes in volume without mechanisms for dealing with the change? Do workers feel they have been given insufficient training and information in order to carry out the task successfully? Page 7 of 9

Doing a risk assessment Source: Health & Safety Executive How do I know if I need to assess the risk in more detail? The guideline figures for stopping/starting a load and for keeping a load in motion are provided in guidance booklet L23 Manual Handling. If these guideline figures are exceeded a full risk assessment should be made. Guideline figures for pushing and pulling men women For stopping or starting a load 20 kg (ie about 200 Newtons) 15 kg (ie about 150 Newtons) For keeping load in motion 10 kg (ie about 100 Newtons) 7 kg (ie about 70 Newtons) However, these figures assume that the force is applied using where the hands are positioned between knuckle and shoulder height and the distance involved is no more than about 20m whether the load is slid, rolled or supported on wheels. If these assumptions are not met, then a more detailed assessment is needed. Also, a detailed risk assessment should be carried out if risk factors such as uneven floors, confined spaces or trapping hazards are present. The amount of force that is needed to move a load over a flat, level surface using a well maintained handling aid is at least 2% of the load weight. Example - Load weight is 200kg; the force needed to move this is 4kg. However, this force may be larger if the conditions are not perfect e.g. wheels are not in the right position, or the device is poorly maintained. Moving weights over soft or uneven surfaces can require greater forces to move the load. On uneven surfaces, the force needed to move a load could increase to 10% of the load weight. Using larger wheels could offset this. Pushing and pulling forces will also increase if a ramp or slope is to be negotiated. Page 8 of 9

There is no specific limit to the distance a load can be pushed or pulled as long as there are sufficient breaks for rest or recovery. Remember: the use of these guidelines does not affect the employer's duty to avoid or reduce the risk of injury where this is reasonably practical. The guideline figures therefore should not be regarded as weight limits or approved figures for safe pushing and pulling operations. Page 9 of 9