THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF BICYCLE IN SÃO PAULO May 2018

Similar documents
Thursday 18 th January Cambridgeshire Travel Survey Presentation to the Greater Cambridge Partnership Joint Assembly

Assessment of socio economic benefits of non-motorized transport (NMT) integration with public transit (PT)

WALK- AND bike-friendly TURLOCK

TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY

2016 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report

WILMAPCO Public Opinion Survey Summary of Results

What s Health Got to Do With It? Health and Land Use Planning

Bogotá in brief. Philip Verma, José Segundo López and Carlosfelipe Pardo. To see full Bogota Bicycle Account:

Greenhouse gas emissions from transport have been rising and are expected to continue to rise both in higher & lower income countries.

Health Impact Analysis for Integrated Regional Land Use and Transportation Plan

Cycle path in Pinheiros, São Paulo: Impact study on local economic vitality

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

Baseline Survey of New Zealanders' Attitudes and Behaviours towards Cycling in Urban Settings

Weather and Cycling in Dublin : Perceptions and Reality

Mobility Constraints of Children in Bangladesh: A Study on Travel to School in Dhaka City

COLUMBUS AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSPORTATION STUDY

FAQ sheet Dutch Cycling Embassy

GD 0043/18 ACTIVE TRAVEL STRATEGY

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN

Outcomes and Economic Benefits of Active Travel

Customer Satisfaction Tracking Report 2016 Quarter 1

NASHUA REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Travel Behaviour Study of Commuters: Results from the 2010 Dalhousie University Sustainability Survey

Active Travel Towns Funding Scheme Project Proposal. Sligo. Sligo Local Authorities

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

Public Healthy and Community Design

Congestion Management in Singapore. Assoc Prof Anthony TH CHIN Department of Economics National University of Singapore

SUSTAINABILITY, TRANSPORT, & HEALTH. Ralph Buehler, Virginia Tech

ABOUT THIS STUDY The Tenderloin-Little Saigon Community-Based Transportation Plan

Time-activity pattern of children and elderly in Rome. Action 3.1

Increasing physical activity levels among employees. Creating a physical activity policy for the workplace

FACTS AND FIGURES: MAKING THE CASE FOR COMPLETE STREETS IN LEE COUNTY

2016 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report

2014 Metro Transit Customer Survey Highlights

Measuring Transportation: Traffic, Mobility and Accessibility

Dalhousie University Commuter Study

Qualitative research into motivations and barriers to cycling Russell Greig Department of Transport, Western Australia.

BIKEPLUS Public Bike Share Users Survey Results 2017

Satisfaction with getting to work 56% 15% 6% 6% Total distance travelled. miles per week

Low Level Cycle Signals with an early release Appendices

DOE Climate Change Proposals

Active Community Design: Why Here? Why Now?

RESTRICTED ROADS (20 MPH SPEED LIMIT) (SCOTLAND) BILL. 1. Is reducing the speed limit to 20mph the best way of achieving the aims of the Bill?

Complete Streets 101: The Basics

Walking and Cycling Action Plan Summary. A Catalyst for Change The Regional Transport Strategy for the west of Scotland

Camosun College Modal Split

TRANSIT & NON-MOTORIZED PLAN DRAFT FINAL REPORT Butte County Association of Governments

Cheryl Thole CUTR/NBRTI, Senior Research Associate Tampa, Florida

Capital Bikeshare 2011 Member Survey Executive Summary

Cycling and Health. The Austrian Masterplan on Cycling. Promoting Cycling for Health, Environment and Quality of Life

Physical activity has a number of benefits

Soft measures affect traffic in Lund effects from two years work with a sustainable transport system in Lund

Downtown Tampa Parking User Survey

Economic Benefits of Cycling for Australia

Summary Report: Built Environment, Health and Obesity

Public Bikesharing in North America: Early Operator and User Understanding

Travel Behavior, Transport Policy, and Sustainable Transport in Germany and the USA

Peterborough Council on Aging

2014 Ontario Works Transit Survey: Final Results

Auckland Council: Electric bicycle CBD trial

TriMet Attitude & Awareness Survey. November 2016

Investment in Active Transport Survey

Konstantin Glukhenkiy Economic Affairs Officer

2014 peterborough city and county. active. transportation. & health. indicators primer

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

January Project No

PERSONALISED TRAVEL PLANNING IN MIDLETON, COUNTY CORK

Market Factors and Demand Analysis. World Bank

Highway School, Ithaca NY

7 June 2016 mobil.tum Munich

No-car lanes in Tyneside results from modelling and stakeholder analysis

City of Birmingham Draft Multi-modal Transportation Plan


Cycling the Danish way Workshop Euro Velo 3 St. James Way. Klaus Bondam, Director at The Danish Cultural Institute/Benelux Thursday December

Idea-66: Westbound I-66 Inside the Beltway

Cobb Community Transit

Creating Complete Streets to Accommodate All Users

CPC Parking Lot Riverside Drive. Transportation Rationale

CITY OF KINGSTON INFORMATION REPORT TO ENVIRONMENT, INFRASTRUCTURE & TRANSPORTATION POLICIES COMMITTEE Report No.: EITP

Measuring and growing active modes of transport in Auckland

Lessons from Copenhagen. John L Bowman 2013

Sun Metro Fixed Route Rider Survey

A Health Impact Assessment (HIA) on a Proposed Road Diet and Re-Striping Project In Spartanburg, SC

Making THE Link The Transport, Health and Environment Pan-European Programme (THE PEP)

Satisfaction with Canada Line and Connecting Buses. Wave 2

VI. Market Factors and Deamnd Analysis

Youth s opinions and attitudes towards the use of electric bicycles in Israel. Background. Assessing the characteristics of teens using EB

GRAHAM PEDESTRIAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN

TR NEWS. Public Health and Transportation. Innovation, Intervention, and Improvements NUMBER 299 SEPTEMBER OCTOBER 2015

Velo-City Women in Cycling Mobility. São Paulo

OC Healthy Communities Forum. The proportion of the population that live within a half mile of a major transit access point.

Bike share success factors

How To Encourage More Efficient Transportation in Brazilian Cities

Westminster s Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy

Briefing Paper #1. An Overview of Regional Demand and Mode Share

U.S. Bicycling Participation Study

1.0 FOREWORD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION CURRENT TRENDS IN TRAVEL FUTURE TRENDS IN TRAVEL...

Executive Summary. TUCSON TRANSIT ON BOARD ORIGIN AND DESTINATION SURVEY Conducted October City of Tucson Department of Transportation

WHITE PAPER: TRANSIT SERVICE FOR SOUTH SHAGANAPPI

Satisfaction with getting to work 54% 14% 6% 5% Total distance travelled. miles per week

Transcription:

THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF BICYCLE IN SÃO PAULO May 2018

d d d d d Objective To estimate the impact of bicycle use in the city of in three areas: Environment, Health and Economy Area Dimensions Indexes Analyze of impacts Environment Wellbeing during the trips Perceptions of comfort and discomfort during the trips Wellbeing reflected by the time spent in outdoor activities Total of CO2 emitted for each mans of transportation Frequency in public spaces Felling of safety in everyday life Perception of problems of the city Reduction of CO2 by exchanging the original means of transport to bicycle Health Pattern of physical activities : sedentary, moderately active and regularly active No physical activities as risk factor to diseases Comparison between population of the city of São Paulo and cyclists Potential amount of money saved in health care public system (SUS) Economy Individual expenditures with transportation Productivity associated with commuting time duration Potential increase in disposable income by exchanging the original means of transport to bicycle Potential increase in GDP

Design and research methodology Survey and sample Survey of June/ December 2017 1,100 interviews at home from September 20 to October 10, 2017 Sample of the population of the city of Complementary sample with users of bicycles in the city of SP Individual who did bicycle trip on the working day before the interview Probabilistic samples with quotas in the Sensus sector (gender, age and education) ensure representativeness and comparability (weighting PNAD/2013 and OD/2007). Structured questionnaire in eight blocks: General block: demographic profile of the population. Mobility: a) routes and means of transportation used in the trips made in the last working day b) feelings during the the every day trips c) transportation costs d) frequency of use of each means of transportation over the last week Problems with the city: perception about the city and the problems that affect personally. Well-being: exposure time in public spaces. Violence: feeling of security in the city. Health: International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)- short form. Economy: personal e family budget (POF/ IBGE form).

Environment

Feelings during the journey Rarely or never Occasionally Always or almost always feature less stress, irritation, fear of delay and discomfort in their trips Stress or annoyance reported more feelings of well-being during their journeys, like pleasure, relaxation and satisfaction Feeling of pleasure during every day trips Afraid of dalay Feeling of pleasure during every day trips Discomfort Satisfaction Feeling of insecurity

Reduction of CO 2 emissions If the cycling potential was reached, there would be up to 18% of a reduction of the CO2 emissions from transport in the city of Travels that could be made with bike by means of transportation Bus Easily cycled Bus Cycled Share of emission of each means of transportation in (bus and automobiles) Automo bile Trips that cannot be cycled Cars Easily cycled Bus Cars Easily cycled Cycled Trips that cannot be cycled Other means of transpor tation Cycled Trips that cannot be cycled In addition, it is estimated that the current riders decrease 3% of CO2 emission of daily trips of the city

Health

Physical activity, inactivity and cycling Proportion of individuals regularly active among cyclists is almost three times the size of the population Physical activity profile Inactive Irregularly active Regularly active Certain groups of the population could expand your physical activity level Regularly active in class and age groups Population of of 1. Regularly active: last week, vigorous physical activities carried out in at least 3 different days and with a minimum duration of 20 minutes a day; 2. Irregularly active: performed physical activities in the last week, but less than the minimum enough to be considered regularly active; 3. Inactive: did not moderate or vigorous physical activity in the last week. Total Classes Age groups Cycling would have the greatest impact on the physical activity of the lower classes 53% of the time of physical activity of cyclists is bike trips

Impact in the reduction of expenses in the public health system (SUS) What would happen if the profile of physical activity of the population of the city mirrored the cyclists? Risk factors associated with physical activity profile Groups Inactive Irregularly active Regularly active Spent on SUS with circulatory system diseases and diabetes in the city of Total saved Heart disease Hypertension Heart attack Depression and anxiety Breast cancer Osteoporosis Colon cancer savings Source: Garrett et al. (2004) 13% of the total reduction in expenses in the SUS with hospitalizations due to diseases of the circulatory system and diabetes

Economy

Increase in disposable income Based on the detailed information of individuals' monthly expenses, we calculate the share of transport expenses in the monthly income (such as bus fare, gasoline, parking) % individuals monthly income average spent on transportation % individuals monthly income average spent on transportation if biclicle trips were made by bicycle % Average monthly saving Reduction potential of personal income spent on transport by class Reduction potential of personal income spent on transport by profile daily travel 14 p. p. of economy A/B class C/D class People who use more public transportation People who use more public motorized individual transport Adoption of the bicycle in daily journeys has the potential of increasing the disposable income, especially, in the lower classes Among those who use more individual motorized transportation, the potential savings exceed R$ 400

Decrease in the time spent on the trips to work The faster commuters travel to work, the higher the productivity is, with potential for increase in GDP (Haddad & Vieira, 2015) We use trips to work up to five miles or eight kilometers, made of car or by bus to calculate the potential based on modal replacement for the bike (from source to destination) Faster travels Time saved Higher the productivity Increase in GDP If the population of São Paulo change the car for the bike, what would be the impact on municipal GDP? of trips are made by car, up to 8 km and are gone and back to work. Of these, 26% would be faster if done by bike. minutes per person per day, on average. more on GDP per day per person. R$ 18.751.053 or 0,003% on GDP in 2015¹ ². And if change were made by bus to bike, what would be the impact on municipal GDP? of trips are made by bus, up to 8 km and are gone and back to work. Of these, 45% would be faster if done by bike. minutes per person per day, on average. more on GDP per day per person. R$ 623.075.941 or 0,096% on GDP in 2015³ 4.

Decrease in collective duration of the travels How to measure the gain with these changes? With fewer cars circling, there would be a collective gain, with decreased congestion, less "waste of time in transit" to the set of cars in their trips and potential increase in productivity in the economy. Faster travels Time saved Higher the productivity Increase in GDP If the decrease in time lost in congestion was accounted for in GDP of travel time of cars are lost in congestion (CET, 2016). minutes would be reduced in the time wasted by other drivers to each change more on GDP per day per person. R$ 225.996.490 or 0,035% on GDP in 2015 5 6.

Carlos Torres Freire catorresfreire@cebrap.org.br Victor Callil victor.callil@cebrap.org.br Dafne Sampaio (Communication) +55 (11) 94489-8212 +55 (11) 5574-0399 ext. 228 comunicacao@cebrap.org.br