stat0il Tone Orke Reservoir Fluid Study for Statoil, Well by Arne M.Martinsen LAB Den norske stab ol.ieselskap a.

Similar documents
PVT analysis of. bottom hole sample from Well by Otto Rogne. STAT01 L EXPLORATION 81 PRODUCTlON LABORATORY

Fit for Purpose Compositional Input for Allocation Using Equations of State Thomas Hurstell, Letton Hall Group

4 RESERVOIR ENGINEERING

GAS CONDENSATE RESERVOIRS. Dr. Helmy Sayyouh Petroleum Engineering Cairo University

Optimization of Separator Train in Oil Industry

ResLab RESERVOIR LABORATORIES AS

COPYRIGHT. Reservoir Fluid Core. Single Phase, Single Component Systems. By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:

Semi-Synthetic PVT with atmospheric wellhead crude samples. Introduction

By: Eng. Ahmed Deyab Fares - Mobile:

MOBIL EXPLORATION NORWAY INC. WELL 35/11-4 DST RESULTS

CALCULATING THE SPEED OF SOUND IN NATURAL GAS USING AGA REPORT NO Walnut Lake Rd th Street Houston TX Garner, IA 50438

Applied Technology and Best Practices in CEE. Conference

PETROLEUM ENGINEERING 310 FIRST EXAM. September 22, 2000

Steve David David & Associates, LLC David & Associates, LLC

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

SPE Copyright 2001, Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc.

Chapter 22 Testing Protocols

Agilent 490 Micro GC Natural Gas Analyzer

Improved Reliability in Natural Gas Energy Measurement with the Revised ISO Standard. Gerard Nieuwenkamp - VSL

New low temperature technologies of natural gas processing

Review of ISO10723 Performance Test Frequency. By Anwar Sutan

Nitrogen subtraction on reported CO 2 emission using ultrasonic flare gas meter

Three Columns Gas Chromatograph Analysis Using Correlation between Component's Molecular Weight and Its Response Factor

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service 2 Pine Trees, Chertsey Lane, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 3HR, UK

Behavior of Gases. Gases are mostly The molecules in a gas are separate, very small and very

Figure Vapor-liquid equilibrium for a binary mixture. The dashed lines show the equilibrium compositions.

Reservoir Fluid Fundamentals COPYRIGHT. Dry Gas Fluid Basic Workflow Exercise Review

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES

Gas Viscosity Measurement and Evaluation for High Pressure and High Temperature Gas Reservoirs

Traceability of greenhouse gases and volatile organic compounds for air monitoring in South Africa

Instrument Performance Evaluation, comparing ISO and NORSOK I-106 Dr Paul Holland, EffecTech Group & Jon Carlsen, Norsk Analyse North Sea Flow

MINING STUDIES AND RESEARCH CENTER (MSRC) FACULTY OF ENGINEERING CAIRO UNIVERSITY NATURAL GAS ENINEERING DIPLOMA

Compositional Grading Theory and Practice

Technical Manual. Sensepoint XCD Gas Detector

44 (0) E:

PETROLEUM ENGINEERING 310 SECOND EXAM. October 23, 2002

Evaluation of Three Different Bubble Point Pressure Correlations on Some Libyan Crude Oils

Mr Roger Wood Measurement & Process Group (M&P) Network Strategy National Grid Gas plc Brick Kiln Street Hinckley Leicestershire LE10 0NA

The Ideal Gas Constant

Laboratory Hardware. Custom Gas Chromatography Solutions WASSON - ECE INSTRUMENTATION. Custom solutions for your analytical needs.

D DAVID PUBLISHING. Gas Ratio Analysis in Hovsan Oil Field. 1. Introduction 1. Samir Hashimov

PE096: Overview of Gas Processing Technology

Physics 7b Midterm Exam #1 Fall Name: Disc. Section SID

1 PIPESYS Application

Drilling fluid rheology at challenging drilling conditions an experimental study using a 1000 bar pressure cell

Capacity and pressure similar to R-507. Flooded systems. Low temperature (-46.7 C). R22 replacement as long as the condenser has the right size.

Novel empirical correlations for estimation of bubble point pressure, saturated viscosity and gas solubility of crude oils

VERIFYING GAS CHROMATOGRAPH OPERATION AT CUSTODY TRANSFER LOCATIONS Murray Fraser Daniel Measurement & Control

North Sea Flow Measurement Workshop th October 2017

FUNDAMENTALS OF NATURAL GAS LIQUID MEASUREMENT. Don Sextro, Targa Resources. Dan Comstock, The University of Texas (PETEX)

GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY MAINTENANCE USING UNCERTAINTY BASED CBM

PVT Analysis Reports of Akpet GT9 and GT12 Reservoirs

Gas viscosity ( ) Carr-Kobayashi-Burrows Correlation Method Lee-Gonzalez-Eakin Method. Carr-Kobayashi-Burrows Correlation Method

Validation Study of Gas Solubility Correlations at bubble point pressure for Some Libyan Crude Oils Using Three chosen Correlations

1. A pure substance has a specific volume of 0.08 L/mol at a pressure of 3 atm and 298 K. The substance is most likely:

International Journal of Petroleum and Geoscience Engineering Volume 03, Issue 01, Pages 56-60, 2015

Validation of Custody Transfer Metering Skid at Site After Laboratory Proving

Example: Calculate the density of methane at 50 psig and 32 ⁰F. H.W. In previous example calculate the density of methane in gm/m 3.

A Conceptual Understanding of Leakage During Soil-Gas Sampling

Field verification of on-line HC dew point measurements

Joint industry project on foam

Gas Metrology. SI-traceable: Primary Reference Materials Certified Reference Materials Calibrated Gas Mixtures Interlaboratory Comparisons

Fundamentals of NGL Sampling Systems. By Dominic Giametta & Jim Klentzman

Experimental Determination of Water Content of Sweet Natural Gas with Methane Component Below 70%

FUNDAMENTALS OF GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY, GAS QUALITY & TROUBLESHOOTING Larry Ewing Chandler Engineering Company LLC

Petrophysical information (Verlo and Hatland, 2008)

SRI 8610C Gas Chromatograph Multiple Gas #3 GC configuration

SPE Copyright 2000, Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc.

Supersedes: The copy of this document located on Measurement Canada s website is considered to be the controlled copy.

Chapter 13 Fluids. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.

Feedstocks & Products Properties & Specifications

Gases NO CALCULATORS MAY BE USED FOR THESE QUESTIONS

CHAPTER 2 EXPERIMENTAL SETUP AND PROCEDURE

LEAP CO 2 Laboratory CO 2 mixtures test facility

Insulation. SOLKANE 365 SOLKANE 365/227 Flammability characteristics and handling. Solvay Special Chemicals

Gases. Unit 10. How do gases behave?

States of Matter Review

Questions/Reminders HW2 Question #3

Carbon Dioxide Flooding. Dr. Helmy Sayyouh Petroleum Engineering Cairo University

17. CARGO MEASUREMENT AND CALCULATION

Laboratory Hardware. Custom Gas Chromatography Solutions WASSON - ECE INSTRUMENTATION. Engineered Solutions, Guaranteed Results.

Use equation for the cylindrical section and equation or for the ends.

States of Matter. Q 7. Calculate the average of kinetic energy, in joules of the molecules in 8.0 g of methane at 27 o C. (IIT JEE Marks)

COLLECTING AND HANDLING OF NATURAL GAS SAMPLES FOR CUSTODY TRANSFER. Christopher L. Grant, Dr. Darin L. George, and Jacob L.

Operating Instructions

Quantitative Analysis of Hydrocarbons by Gas Chromatography

PRE LABORATORY ASSIGNMENT: Lab Section Score: /10 READ THE LAB TEXT BEFORE ATTEMPTING THESE PROBLEMS!

Determination of Bubble-Point and Dew-Point Pressure Without a Visual Cell

NOTES: Behavior of Gases

Lecture Handout 5: Gases (Online Text Chapter 6)

Petroleum Reservoir Rock and Fluid Properties

Improved Monitoring of Dissolved Transformer Gases on the Basis of a Natural Internal Standard (NIS)

Emerging Issues in the Oil and Gas Industry

Practice Test FOR GAS POSITIONS APTITUDE BATTERY

Gas Billing Factors Guideline

CHE 4115 Chemical Processes Laboratory 2 Experiment 1. Batch Distillation

B. As the gas particles move and strike a surface, they push on that surface 1. If we could measure the total amount of force exerted by gas

EQUILIBRIUM CONST ANTS FOR A GAS-CONDENSATE SYSTEM

APPENDIX A: SENSITIVITY TESTS INPUTS AND SETUP TABLES

Abstract. Christof Huber 1 1 Endress+Hauser Flowtec AG, Kägenstrasse 7, CH-4153 Reinach, Switzerland

Transcription:

stat0il Den norske stab ol.ieselskap a.s c Classification Requested by K n Hanstveit, PL-050 Subtitle Co-workers Tone Orke Reservoir Fluid Study for Statoil, Well 3411 0-1 1 STATOI L EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION LABORATORY by Arne M.Martinsen LAB 84.214 Prepared 9 - Approved

SUMMARY This report presents PVT and compositional data for three samples from the Statfjord formation of well 34/10-11: One bottom hole sample and one set of separator samples from DST no. 1, collected at 2018-2028 m, and one set of separator samples from DST no. 2, collected at 1891-1896 m. Compositional analysis and physical recombination has been performed on the separator samples. Constant mass experiments have been carried out at three temperatures for the bottom hole sample and at the reservoir temperature for the recombined samples. A three stage separator test has been carried out for the recombined sample from DST no. 2. Compositional analysis after flash to standard conditions have been performed on the bottom hole sample and the recombined samples. The experimental data are compared in table 1. LAB 84.214

Table 1. Comparison of experimental data for reservoir fluid samples from 34/10-11, Statfjord formation. Composition, mole%* Components DST no. 1 DST no. 1 DST no. 2 bottom hole recombined recombined sample sep.sample sep.sample Carbondioxide Nitrogen Methane Ethane Propane i so-butane n-butane iso-pentane n-pentane Hexanes Heptanes Octanes Nonanes Decanes+ LAB 84.214

Table 1 (continued) DST no. 1 DST no. 1 DST no. 2 bottom hole recombined recombined sample sep.sample sep.sample Reservoir temp. (OC) Bubble-point pressure at res.temp. (barg) Density at bubble 3 point (g/cm ) Gas/oil ratio from single 3 3 flash (Sm /m 149.5 Formation volume factor from 3 3 single flash (m /Sm ) 1.447 Mean molecular weight of stock-tank oil* 209 Density of stock-tank oil (g/cm3 at 15O~) Gravity of single flash gas (air = 1) 0.84 * Stock-tank oil, flash gas and compositional data are from single flash of reservoir fluid to standard conditions: 15Oc and 1 atm. LAB 84.214

INTRODUCTION Statoil Prolab was requested by the 34/10 license to perform PVT analyses on three different samples from well 34/10-11: One bottom hole sample and one set of separator samples from DST no. 1, and one set of separator samples from DST no. 2. The analyses were carried out and preliminary results reported in 1981. The present report has been completed in March 1984. The present compositions have been slightly altered on the basis of a new value for the molecular weight of the CI0+ distillation fraction, which was measured in 1984. No other change of the older data has been made. LAB 84.214

2. SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Samples from DST no. 1 The samples were collected during the test in perforated interval 2018-2028 m. The bottom hole sample was marked 8088-28. The opening pressure was about 95 bar and the bubble-point pressure at ambient about 175 bar. One should, however, note that the sampling equipment was dropped down the well by an accident at the end of the test (see test reports). One of the bottom hole samplers was reported to be undamaged; however, the risk of a leak was obviously increased. The separator samples were marked 9024-91 (oil) and A-10914 (gas). The opening pressure of the oil bottle was approx. 15 barg. A validity check gave a bubble point pressure of about 16 barg at ambient, which is in agreement with the separator pressure of 17 barg at ~OC. The opening pressure of the gas bottle was also consistent with the separator pressure. Samples from DST no. 2 The separator samples were collected during the test in perforated interval 1891-1896m. The samples were marked 20438-46 (oil) and A-10996 (gas). The opening pressure of the oil bottle was approx.9 barg at ambient. The bubble-point pressure at ambient was about 11 barg, which is equal to the separator pressure at 13O~. The opening pressure of the gas bottle was also consistent with the separator pressure. See sampling sheets in Appendix. LAB 84.214

3. METHODS AND EQUIPMENT PVT analyses were performed in a Ruska visual PVT cell. Single flash to standard conditions (15'~ and 1 atm) was performed in a Ruska Flash Separator. The gas was sampled in a Ruska Gasometer. Component analysis was performed using a Hewlett Packard 5880 gas-chromatographic system. For gas analysis, non hydrocarbons were determined on a poropack R 1/8" x 3 m steel column with TC detector, and hydrocarbons on chromapack cp%3il 5 50 m x 0.22 mm quartz capillary column with FI detector. Oil analysis were performed on a gas chromatograph fitted with chromapack CP@S~~ 5 25 m x 0.22 m quartz capillary column and FI detector. Molecular weight was determined by freezing point depression of benzene, density by a Paar DMA 602 frequency densitometer. LAB 84.214

4. RESULTS 4.1 Bottom hole sample no. 8088-28, DST no. 1 Results from the constant mass expansion experiments on the bottom-hole sample are shown in tables 2 to 4 and figures 1 to 3. The bubble-point pressure was found to be 191.1 barg at 34.0~~. 203.3 barg at 54.6Oc, and 213.9 barg at 80.0'~. Results from single flash and the calculated reservoir-fluid composition are given in table 5. Separator samples 9024-91 and A-10914, DST no. 1 Results from flash of separator liquid to standard conditions and a calculated separator-liquid composition are given in table 6. Data from analysis of separator gas and the calculated reservoir fluid composition are shown in table 7. Results from the constant mass expansion experiment on the recombined fluid are shown in table 8 and fig. 4. The bubble-point pressure at 80 C was found to be 301.9 barg. Results from single flash of the recombined reservoir fluid to standard conditions are shown in table 9. The derived reservoir-fluid composition agrees well with the calculated composition in table 7. 4.3 Separator samples 20438-46 and A-10996, DST no. 2 Results from flash of separator liquid to standard conditions and the calculated separator-liquid composition are given in table 10. Data from analysis of separator gas and the calculated reservoir-fluid composition are shown in table 11. Results from the constant mass expansion experiment on the recombined fluid are shown in table 12 and fig. 5. The bubble-point pressure at 75.6Oc was found to be 272.1 barg. Results from single flash of the recombined fluid and the derived reservoir-fluid composition are given in table 13. Results from a 3 stage separator test of the reservoir fluid are given in tables 14 and 15. LAB 84.214