TRANSIT RIDERSHIP IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL PROJECTS OPERATING PLANS - NEXT NETWORK TRANSIT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Similar documents
City of Davenport CitiBus Public Transportation Study. April 2015

Everett Transit Action Plan. Community Open House November 16, 2015

CARTA East Cooper Transit Service Transportation Committee Town of Mount Pleasant. February 5, 2013

Arlington County 10-Year Transit Development Plan & Premium Transit Network Briefing. May 2016

Aurora Corridor to E Line

Philadelphia Bus Network Choices Report

Transit Workshop with MPO Board

EL CAMINO REAL BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) PROJECT

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Henrico County Transit Choices Report AUGUST 2017

May 2018 FY Key Performance Report

Pocatello Regional Transit Master Transit Plan Draft Recommendations

SacRT Forward Network Plan: Transit Choices Report

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Transit Ridership - Why the Decline and How to Increase. Hosted by the. Virginia Transit Association

September 2018 FY Key Performance Report

Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council

Craig Rempp, Transit Superintendent Mary Karlsson, Kimley-Horn. Mankato City Council Meeting 6/25/2018

VISION Long Range Plan Update Board Workshop. February 10, 2016

Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting Steve Fittante, New Jersey Transit Corporation September 30, 2013

Transit Operations in the I-95 Express Lanes

Auckland Transport Monthly Indicators Report 2018/19

SOLTRANS BOARD MEETING SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS / HANDOUTS January 15, 2015 MEETING HANDOUTS

January 2019 FY Key Performance Report

Cutting Canada s Slowest Rush Hour with Public Transportation

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

Where We Live and Work Today

Capital and Strategic Planning Committee. Item III - B. April 12, WMATA s Transit-Oriented Development Objectives

Item 5.1 TRANSIT DAY 2018 BUDGET PRESENTATION. Public Works Department TRANSIT

Market Factors and Demand Analysis. World Bank

DART Ridership. Board Workshop January 5, 2018

Transit Optimization Plan. September 2017

Speaker: Brian Dranzik, Fiscal & Policy Administrator Milwaukee County

Public Consultation Centre For. Transportation Master Plan Update. Information Package

County of Orange Resources and Development Management Department Harbors, Beaches and Parks. Strategic Plan. HBP Strategic Plan Workshop 1.

Access BART: TOD and Improved Connections. October 29, 2008

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN

WELCOME Mission-Geneva Transportation Study

CONNECTING OUR CITY WITH TRANSIT

Auckland Transport Monthly Indicators Report 2018/19

Short-Term Transit Ridership and Revenue Forecasting

METRO Now. Transit Leader. One of only four urban. gain bus ridership in Purple and Green Lines. Red Line is one

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

EMU Procurement Seats/Standees/Bikes/Bathroom

Calgary Transit Route 302 Southeast BRT Year One Review June

Measuring and Communicating Mobility:

Seattle Transit Master Plan

EL CAMINO REAL BUS RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT

Regional Bicycle System Master Study. Preliminary Results Update

An Evaluation of Comprehensive Transit Improvements TriMet s Streamline Program

4 Ridership Growth Study

Going Green: How California is Reviving Passenger Rail. APTA/ AASHTO AASHTO 2008 State Public Transit Partnerships. August 7, 2008

Semi-Annual DC Circulator Forum. February 25, 2014

Previous Transit Studies MTTF MEETING #

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

BUILDING THE CASE FOR TRAVEL OPTIONS IN WASHING TON COUNTY. Image: Steve Morgan. Image: Steve Morgan

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Sept. 26, 2011

95 Express Annual Operations Report: Fiscal Year

Afeasibility study to evaluate bus rapid transit service in the East-West Corridor connecting major employment and activity centers between downtown

Capital Metro Monthly Ridership Report December 2016 (Fiscal Year 2017)

395 Express Lanes Extension

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

Cheryl Thole CUTR/NBRTI, Senior Research Associate Tampa, Florida

Dear City Council Members,

VI. Market Factors and Deamnd Analysis

Wilshire Boulevard Bus Rapid Transit Project

MORE CONNECTIONS. Redesigning routes for the future of transit in Milwaukee County.

First and Last Mile Strategic Plan. CASTA Annual Meeting 2018

Replacement Parking and BART TOD

Rhode Island Bus Stop Design Guide

North Carolina Transportation Issues

REVENUE & RIDERSHIP REPORT SEPTEMBER 2018

RIDERSHIP PREDICTION

Scheduling 101 Calculating Running Time Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority Multimodal Operations Workshop Houston, TX

ABOUT THIS STUDY The Tenderloin-Little Saigon Community-Based Transportation Plan

July 23, Transit Workshop

Performance Measures Year End 2015

Community Task Force July 25, 2017

RTC TRANSIT OPERATING STATISTICS RTC RIDE RTC RAPID RTC INTERCITY SIERRA SPIRIT

Next Steps Staff report to Council on October 2, 2018 to present the Whistler 2018 Transportation Action Plan Final Draft

Instances of 1 Minute or Less Between Buses 4 5% 55% 3.9% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 2.9% 2.8% Sep- Sep 07 Oct-07 Nov-07 Dec-07 Jan- Jan 08 Feb- Feb 08 Mar-08

WHITE PAPER: TRANSIT SERVICE FOR SOUTH SHAGANAPPI

Capital Metro Monthly Ridership Report November 2016 (Fiscal Year 2017)

1.221J/11.527J/ESD.201J TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS FALL 2003 FINAL EXAMINATION. 1. Open-book and open-notes, calculators are fine -- no laptops.

REVENUE & RIDERSHIP REPORT NOVEMBER 2017

THE NEXUS OF LIVABILITY, TRANSIT, AND PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT

ARTICLE 8. Any Other Business a. Library Gathering Space Plan January 24, 2017, 5:30 7:00 p.m. b. Update on Planning Activities

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

Capital Metro Monthly Ridership Report January 2018 (Fiscal Year 2018)

Highway Transitway Corridor Study

Cranbrook Transit System. Service Review Report

Understanding Rail and Bus Ridership

ROUTE 124. Mountain Condos ROUTE OVERVIEW

Changes in Travel Behavior Affecting Transit

Increased Onboard Bicycle Capacity Improved Caltrain s Performance in 2009

Appendix A-K Public Information Centre 2 Materials

Walking the Talk: Sustainable Transport and Urban Design in Four New Zealand Cities

Kennedy Plaza and Providence Downtown Transit Connector PUBLIC MEETING. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

Encouraging Taxi Drivers to Behave: Grafton Bridge Taxi and Bus Lane Trial. Rob Douglas-Jones Tim Segedin, Edin Ltd.

the Story of the 30s & 70s Bus Lines James Hamre - WMATA

Transcription:

TRANSIT RIDERSHIP IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL PROJECTS OPERATING PLANS - NEXT NETWORK TRANSIT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

VTA S NEXT NETWORK CONNECT TO BART STATIONS INCREASE RIDERSHIP IMPROVE FAREBOX RECOVERY RATE CHANGE IN PLANNING APPROACH

Growing Population, But Unstable Transit Ridership and Service Level +12% POPULATION -13% REVENUE HOURS -23% RIDERSHIP

VTA and Peer Agency Farebox Recovery Rates, 2002-2015

HOW TO INCREASE RIDERSHIP VTA TOOLBOX MORE PASSENGERS PER BUS MORE TRIPS PER RIDER MORE USEFUL TRANSIT FREQUENT CORE NETWORK

HOW TO INCREASE RIDERSHIP CITY TOOLBOX DESIGN CITIES FOR TRANSIT LAND USE STREET DESIGN

RIDERSHIP OR COVERAGE? 70% RIDERSHI P VTA TODAY 30% COVERAGE

PEAK PERIOD OR ALL DAY?

FOCUS ON WEEKDAYS OR ALL DAYS? Su M Tu W Th F Sa

FREQUENCY OR LONGER HOURS OF OPERATION? MORE STOPS OR FASTER SPEEDS? LOW FARES OR LOW PUBLIC SUBSIDIES?

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT APR AUG COMMUNITY MEETINGS MAY JUL ONLINE ANYTIME COMMUNITY LEADER WORKSHOPS WWW.VTA.ORG/NEXTNETWORK BOOK-A-PLANNER

VTA Next Network: Your Transit Choices

Outline What High Ridership Transit Looks Like Choice: How to balance ridership and coverage? Choice: How to balance peak service with all-day, allweek service?

Timeline March 2016 April 7, 2016 April 14, 2016 May-Aug 2016 Aug-Oct 2016 Dec. 2016 Jan-Feb 2017 March 2017 April 2017 July 2017 Choices Report Released Alternative Network Concepts Released Report on Alternative Concepts Outreach on Alternative Concepts Board Direction on Alternative Concepts Draft Final '17 Network Released Outreach on Draft Plan Final Recommended Plan Prepared Board Adopts Final Plan BART Opens. Next Network Service Begins.

The Ridership Recipe

Ridership By ridership we always mean productivity i.e. riders per unit of service. i.e. riders relative to cost. This tracks with farebox recovery. Transit outcomes arise from three-legged stool : Transit service Land Use Street Design and Management VTA controls only one leg!

The Ridership Recipe High All-Day Frequency Following patterns of... Density Walkability Linearity Proximity Why? Because this brings the most useful destinations within reasonable travel time of the most people.

The Ridership Recipe

The Ridership Recipe

The Ridership Recipe

The Ridership Recipe

Why Frequency Matters Frequency is a cubed benefit : Go when you want to go, arrive when you want to arrive. Make connections easily, multiplying the places you can go. Better reliability. For short trips, waiting is a large part of travel time. (Speed and reliability matter too, but they are less neglected than frequency.)

Most Productive Routes are Frequent Productivity by Frequency 201 73 40 23 22 64 10 72 66 54 26 46 Productivity (Boardings per Revenue Hour) 30 20 25 522 77 70 323 68 71 55 47 57 61 40 60 31 62 82 181 52180 37 81 35 89 19 18 14 32 63 27 42 65 53 39 51 45 48 88 13 49 58 34 Cat a a a a Community Core Express Local 17 10 0 0 10 15 20 30 45 60 Prevailing Midday Frequency

This is true everywhere

Current All-day Frequency

Density + Linearity + Frequency

= Ridership

Peak vs All-Day

Why All-Day Matters

Hidden Costs of Peak Service Three extra costs for peak services and frequencies: Cost to own/store/maintain extra buses. Cost of very short shifts Costs of one-way operation: all vehicles have to come back (empty). All of these are worst for long rush-hour commutes.

The Ridership-Coverage Tradeoff But is Ridership What You Want?

The Ridership-Coverage Tradeoff Maximizing Ridership (and farebox return) requires thinking like a business. Businesses choose which markets to enter, based on where their product can succeed. This is not the same as meeting people s needs or expectations.

How should a transit agency allocate its resources? Fictional Urban Area Dots = residents and jobs You have 18 buses

Ridership Goal Maximize Ridership Think like a business, choosing which markets you will enter. The straight roads offer density and walkability, so you focus frequent service there. Frequency s payoff is cubed. Ridership Network Performance Measure: Productivity

Coverage Goal Serve Everyone Think like a government service. Try to serve everyone, even those in expensive-to-serve places. The result is more routes covering everyone, but worse frequency, more complexity, and lower ridership. Performance Measure: Access or coverage

Both goals are important, but they lead opposite directions! Ridership Goal Coverage Goal Think like a business. Focus where ridership potential is highest. Support dense and walkable development. Max. competition with cars Maximum VMT reduction Think like a gov t service. Access for all Support suburban low-density development. Lifeline access for everyone. Service to every member city or electoral district.

So it helps to choose a point on the spectrum Ridership Goal Coverage Goal Existing System ~ 70% ridership About 70% of your service is where it would be if ridership were VTA s only goal.

Outtakes

Falling Behind Population Growth