Lucrări ştiinţifice Zootehnie şi Biotehnologii, vol. 40(2), (2007), Timişoara

Similar documents
Expression of Varroa Sensitive Hygiene (VSH) in Iranian Honey Bees (Apis mellifera meda)

BREEDING QUEENS IN THE AGE OF VARROA

Comparison of the reproductive ability of varroa mites in worker and drone brood of Africanized Honey Bees

Varroa destructor Infestation in Untreated Honey Bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Colonies Selected for Hygienic Behavior

Steven & Angelia Coy Wiggins, MS

Resources for Integrated Pest Management (IPM) and Varroa Mite Control

Figure 1. Thresholds for sticky board types. Threshold of 60 varroa mites. Threshold of 120 varroa mites. Research by the beekeeper for the beekeeper

A K.I.S.S. Model for Breeding Locally-adapted Varroa-resistant Bees

Integrated Pest Management

Breeding honey bees for varroa tolerance

Notes on Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae) parasitic on honeybees in New Zealand

Nomenclature. David E. MacFawn Master Craftsman Beekeeper SCBA Aiken Journeyman Class Saturday, April 23, 2016

Newsletter of the Appalachian Beekeepers

DARG Predator Mites An Experience of their use

Varroa Management. How do I know if my colonies have Varroa?

Kathleen Prough Chief Apiary Inspector IDNR, Div. of Entomology & Plant Pathology Work # Cell # ,

Bees Biting Mites. Breeding and small cell size. by ERIK OSTERLUND Sweden

Preparing Honeybee Colonies for Winter

Integrated pest management against Varroa destructor reduces colony mite levels and delays treatment threshold

Learning to identify a common cause of winter death in Northern Climates

Week 3: Bee Diseases & Pests. Richard Manley & Rick Moranz

Natural Beekeeping. Small Hive Beekeeping to Manage Varroa Mites

May 4th Monthly meeting Friends Meeeting House 7:30pm. June Association Apiary visit Richmond Street (date to be announced)

Honey Bee Pests and Diseases. Dale McMahan

Effect of cell size on Varroa 37 Africanized cells (13.9 and 10.3%, respectively). The Carniolan-sized cells also had a significantly larger number of

Varroa Mites. Diagnose the disease first then diagnose the problem with the Honey Bee. Where can You find Varroa Mites?

The Varroa Bee Mite 1

Making Splits. Jeff Harris

VARROA IS PUBLIC ENEMY # 1

Managing Varroa Mites in Honey Bee Colonies

Beekeeping in Coastal California. January

SELECTION FOR UNCAPPING OF VARROA INFESTED BROOD CELLS IN THE HONEYBEE (APIS MELLIFERA)

A NEW LOOK AT SPLITS

Beekeepers of Volusia County Florida

Infestation levels of Varroa destructor in local honey bees of Jordan

Kevin O Donnell, Individual Experimental Project, UM Master Beekeeping Course, August, 2018

Presented by Judy Scher

FOR TREATMENT OF VARROOSIS CAUSED BY VARROA DESTRUCTOR IN HONEY BEES (APIS MELLIFERA)

PRACTICAL 16 FAMILIARIZATION WITH ENEMIES OF HONEY BEES AND THEIR CONTROL

WORKSHOP #2 Sturgeon Analysis. Bucharest 07 October STUDIU DE FEZABILITATE ÎN PUNCTUL CRITIC 01 BALA Workshop #2

SBA Technical Data Sheet Number 8 - Detecting and monitoring Varroa Mites Including instructions on the making and use of a Varroa Floor

Beekeeping PARASITIC MITES OF HONEY BEES. Greg Hunt, Bee Specialist, Purdue University

VARROA MITE MONITORING

ATTEMPTS FOR OPTIMIZATION THE GENETIC IMPROVEMENT ACTIONS IN HORSE POPULATIONS OF NONIUS VARIETY AND ARDENNES BREED FROM THE IZVIN STUD, TIMIŞ COUNTY

Varroa destructor, How bad could that bee? Philip Moore Research Associate The University of Tennessee

NZQA Expiring unit standard version 3 Page 1 of 5. Demonstrate knowledge of the varroa mite and its control in the beekeeping industry

Varroa Mites: Samples and Controls (Varroa destructor or jacobsoni) -discovered S.E. Asia 1904; U.S. 1987

VARROA-BEE RELATIONSHIPS -WHAT THEY TELL US ABOUT CONTROLLING VARROA MITES ON THE EUROPEAN HONEY BEE

The Bee Keepers Year

CAGE. ENGLISH INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE Insertion of the cage. lnsertion of the queen. Restriction of brood period. right position

Siting your apiary and the years work. By Michael O Neill and Jacqui Glisson

The effectiveness of thermotherapy in the elimination of Varroa destructor

Do, or do not, treat for mites? Pro s and Con s of. Methods

Best Management Practices for Varroa Mite Control in Wisconsin Liz Walsh, Texas A&M University and Kent Pegorsch, WHPA President January 2018

MITE AWAY QUICK STRIPS FAQS

Integrated Pest Management. For Beekeepers. Lynn Williams

Effect of queen age on hygienic and grooming behavior of Apis mellifera Ligustica against Varroa destructor

Apiguard - Frequently Asked Questions

FY ' 06 Apiary Inspection Report Illinois Department of Agriculture (July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2006)

VARROA MITE MONITORING

I have just given you a number of facts about myself and our beekeeping; I give you one more -

Pests & Diseases of Honeybees

SBA NEWS LETTER ARTICLE: THE SASKATRAZ PROJECT - APRIL 2011

Effectiveness of Roadside Safety Measures

Susquehanna Beekeeper s Association

Enemies of the Hive. First Lessons in Beekeeping by Keith S. Delaplane Chapter 8 Honey Bee Disorders, Parasites, Predators and Nest Invaders

bee. Investigating this is a valuable pursuit, behaviors to proceed with breeding as Another barrier they cite is criticism

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MAQS+ AND THE MITE AWAY QUICK STRIPS?

FY ' 04 Apiary Inspection Report Illinois Department of Agriculture (July 1, 2003 through June 30, 2004)

Field Tests of the Varroa Treatment Device Using Formic Acid to Control Varroa destructor and Acarapis woodi 1

MORPHOLOGICAL STUDY CONCERNING THE REPRODUCTION HORSES FROM ROMANIAN SEMIGREUL BREED FROM RUŞEŢU STUD

INFLUENCE OF BOOM HEIGHT AND WORKING PRESSURE ON DISTRIBUTION UNIFORMITY ON THE WIDTH OF SPRAYING MACHINES

YOUR BEES DON T HAVE TO DIE

Bee Informed Partnership: Sentinel Apiary Program Final Report 2017

Does a remote Brazilian island hold the key to varroa tolerance?

The Russians Are Coming (Actually They Are Here) - By Joe Lewis

Overview. Brood Diseases. Adult Diseases. American Foulbrood (AFB) European Foulbrood (EFB) Chalkbrood Sacbrood. Nosema

The Occurrence of Acarapis dorsalis, Acarapis externus and Acarapis woodi Mites. in Honey bee Populations Surrounding Poitiers, France INTRODUCTION

RESEARCH REGARDING THE INFLUENCE OF BETA IRRADIATION ON THE ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY OF BAKER S YEAST

Diseases and Pests, Tammy Horn, Photo by Jason Gaines, 2015

Biology of the Varroa mite: what you need to know to understand its population dynamics

IMPACT OF VARROA DESTRUCTOR ON THE HONEY BEES OF SOUTH AFRICA

PLANNING FOR VARROA MEGHAN MILBRATH, MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION, MARCH 2017

Biology of the Varroa mite: what you need to know to understand its population dynamics

Recommendations for Management of Honey Bee Diseases and Pests in Alberta

Recommendations for Management of Honey Bee Pests and Diseases in Alberta 2012

Clarification of aspects of Varroa reproduction first stage of a possible new control method

INVASION OF BEE SAMPLES WITH VARROA DESTRUCTOR

VARROA MITE INFESTATION IN APIARIES OF DUHOK PROVINCE, KURDISTAN REGION, IRAQ. Z. N. Ayoub, D. S. Ahmed and H. R. Ismael

CARROLL COUNTY BEEKEEPERS ASSOC.

DOI: /jas

Varroa Mite, Varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman (Arachnida: Acari:Varroidae) 1

Diseases and pests of honey bees. Zachary Huang Michigan State University. Varroa mite (Varroa destructor) (formerly Varroa jacobsoni)

Africanized honey bees (Apis mellifera) have low infestation levels of the mite Varroa destructor in different ecological regions in Mexico

GUIDELINES FOR PREVENTION, DETECTION AND CONTROL OF HONEY BEE PATHOTHOGENS AND PARASITES IN TEXAS. American Foulbrood.. 1. European Foulbrood..

ADAPTABILITY, PERFORMANCE AND PRODUCTIVE LONGEVITY TO THE ELITE NUCLEUS OF BROWN BREED FROM RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT STATION FOR BOVINE RAISING ARAD

How I Use the JZs BZs Plastic Queen Cage: Featuring the Get Acquainted Window. By Joe Lewis

Bomb vs Bond. Treatment/nontreatment: The twain do meet, and let us count the ways Part I. By M.E.A. McNeil

Small-cell comb does not control Varroa mites in colonies of honeybees of European origin

Varroa attacks! Erik Osterlund

Transcription:

Lucrări ştiinţifice Zootehnie şi Biotehnologii, vol. 40(2), (2007), Timişoara PRELIMINARY RESEARCHES REGARDING THE DETERMINATION OF DISEASES NATURAL RESISTANCE IN ROMANIAN HONEYBEES POPULATION (A.M. CARPATHICA), USING SOME SPECIFIC TESTS. CERCETARI PRELIMINARE PRIVIND DETERMINAREA GRADULUI NATURAL DE REZISTENTA LA BOLI LA ALBINA MELIFERA DIN ROMANIA (A.M. CARPATICA) PE BAZA UNOR TESTE SPECIFICE. CAUIA ELIZA, SICEANU A., SAPCALIU AGRIPINA, CAUIA D. The Institute for Beekeeping Research and Development-Bucharest In the last years, in internationally context, was proved that long-term chemotherapy could have negative impact, increasing the resistance of bee diseases to the medication with consequences from economic points of view especially on the quality of beekeeping products. In this context, the strategy of bee diseases control was reanalyzed, the researches being reoriented through finding the alternative and non-polluted solutions, which could be integrated in an efficient system of bee diseases control, depending on breed, climate, and maintaining systems. Thus, one of the research directions is the ameliorative selection of bees for natural diseases resistance combined with other desired morpho-productive and behavioral characteristics, in this way a series of specific tests being already established. The hygienic behaviour is the primary way to defend against some bee diseases, especially to American foulbrood (Rothenbuhler, 1964) and chalk brood (Gilliam, 1983). The honeybees with high hygienic behavior detect, uncap and remove the infested brood more rapidly than others, before the disease to be spread.the preliminary researches carried out in the breeding apiaries of the Beekeeping Research and Development Institute (Bucharest) aimed to establish the natural diseases resistance degree of local bee populations (A. m. carpathica), by applying specific tests to identify the bee colonies with high hygienic behaviour. Key words: honeybees, bee breeding, diseases resistance, hygienic behaviour. Introduction The identification of some natural mechanisms of resistance to disease in honey bees has conducted to a series of studies in order to establish the number of bee colonies from a population with these traits. The carried out researches in internationally context, have put into highlights that the permanent selection of resistant bee population is the most 61

sustainable solution and for long term to minimize the varroa infestation under the threshold of economic damage. The most important identified mechanisms of natural resistance and to defend face to some specific diseases (varrosis, acarapiosis, chalk brood, as well as American and European foulbrood) are: hygienic behaviour, grooming behaviour, suppressed mite reproduction. All these mechanisms are intensively studied in last time, being identified in different percents in different honeybees races. As it happened in host of origin of Varroa jacobsoni, without medical treatments and in time the honey bees will be adapted to varroa by natural selection of the most resistant honeybee colonies. By artificial selection it is considered that the resistance to diseases will be more rapidly obtained. The hygienic behaviour is the primary way to defend against some bee diseases, especially to American foulbrood (Rothenbuhler, 1964) and chalk brood (Gilliam, 1983). The honeybees with high hygienic behaviour detect, uncap and remove the infested brood more rapidly than others, before that the disease to be spread. The hygienic behaviour is a defending behaviour in varrosis too (Peng et al., 1987), and although this is not the main mechanism of resistance against the mites it is assumed by researchers that it limits the reproduction of mites in a certain degree. A series of studies have showed that it is possible to select the resistance traits in an apiary without negative consequences on honey production or other desired traits (Spivak, 1996). It was found that the trait of high hygienic behaviour can be identified in approximately 10% of bee colonies. So, for this reason, the ameliorative selection of honeybee colonies with high hygienic behaviour correlated with other desired traits will bring benefits to beekeeping industry worldwide if selected material will be commercially disposable. Some studies show that the heritability of eliminating infested brood with varroa is h 2 = 0.18 (± 0.27), and for elimination of artificially killed brood by pinning is h 2 = 0.36 (± 0.30). The identification of honeybee colonies with high hygienic behaviour is done usually by means of two assays, aiming to determinate the percentage of dead brood which was identified by adult bees, uncapped and removed from cells. The first assay uses the method of brood freezing (in a freeze or by liquid nitrogen) being the most accurate test although is more laborious (using the freeze) or with many cautions (using the N 2 liquid). The second is the brood pinning assay which is less accurate but more simple in application. Materials and methods The goal of these researches was to preliminary estimate the percentage of high hygienic honeybee colonies belonging to A.m carpathica genetic 62

background. In order to do this the both known tests, brood freezing and pinning tests were applied. These specific tests were applied in a breeding apiary (Baneasa) belonging to the production and research apiaries network of the Beekeeping Research and Development Institute from Bucharest in June period -2006. In order to carry out the researches a number of 25 bee colonies with the best result in honey productivity (acacia honey tested in May 2006) were taken into the experimental group being also equipped with anti-varroa bottoms to establish some infestation level of varroa. The two hygienic behaviour tests were applied concomitantly on the selected bee colonies: the test of killing brood by freezing and the test of killing brood by pinning. In this way, a compact egg laid brood frame in capped stage, with good viability of brood was taken out of hive and two area of brood were marked using a stainless metal frame which include 130 de cells (6,5 cm X 6 cm). One of these areas was cut, numbered and introduced into freeze at -10 degree C for 24 h. On the second area of capped brood all the cells were pinned using a fine stainless pin. After 24 h the sectioned areas collected and frozen in plastic bags were introduced in the originated place of frame were they were collected from. After another 24 h and 48 h after they were introduced into the hives and after they were pinned it was estimated the number of empty, cleaned cells, meaning the number of capped cell that was uncapped by bees and the pupae removed. Parallel, at the beginning of experiment, there were estimated the number of empty cells that correspond to unviable larvae, thus establishing the viability of brood. It is known from the scientific papers that the relevant interval of time for numbering the uncapped and removed brood is 24h for pinning test and 48 hour for frozen killed brood. Photo nr 1. The applying of the two tests in order to establish the degree of hygienic behaviour - left frozen brood test, right-pinning brood test. Results And Discussion By applying the specific test we obtained the following results being enclosed in table number 1. 63

From these data it results that the viability of brood in experimental bee colonies ranged between 82% and 99%, the most part of honeybee colonies -90% having a good viability over 85% which assure a good strength of bee colonies. The application of tests to estimate the percentage of honeybee colonies with hygienic behaviour has conduct to the following results: Table 1 Bee Brood % removed brood colony viability Freezing test Pinning test number % After 24 After 48 after 24 h after 48 h h h 1 87 10 30 75 80 2 92.5 40 98 99 100 3 84 60 90 65 95 4 93 35 90 75 97 5 93 10 50 50 80 6 90 20 75 65 99 7 89 30 90 87 97 8 98 5 10 35 70 9 97 30 65 85 100 10 93 15 30 20 75 11 99 5 20 90 100 12 93 50 85 95 100 13 90 20 50 99 100 14 95.5 50 75 89 100 15 93 60 98 90 100 16 91 5 30 20 65 17 95 5 20 85 90 18 89 55 90 95 99 19 82 5 30 20 60 20 93 25 70 85 90 21 85 15 30 20 75 22 97 20 50 99 100 23 93 20 75 65 99 24 82 10 50 50 80 25 98 40 98 99 100 The min and max limits 82-99 5-60 10-98 20-99 60-100 64

The frozen brood test. - Out of the 25 determinations regarding the removing of frozen brood it was noted that after 24 hours there were no one bee colony with high hygienic behaviour, which to eliminate the dead brood more than 90%, the values being ranged between 5% and 60%, noting also the fact that only 5 colonies (20%) have eliminated the dead brood more than 50%. - After 48 h there were registered a number of 7 bee colonies (28%) which removed the brood more than 90%, which is the value that is considered by researchers as high hygienic behavior. Between 60% and 90 % there were registered a number of 6 honey bee colonies (24%), these being considered by other studies as colonies with medium hygienic behavior and a number of 12 honeybee colonies (48%) with low hygienic behavior, which removed only between 10% and 60% from the dead brood. The 7 high hygienic bee colonies (number 2, 3, 4, 7, 15, 18 and 25) represent 28% from the total of tested bee colonies. Photos 2 and 3 are examples of bee colonies with high hygienic behaviour (left - colony number 2) - after 48 h when 98% from the frozen brood was removed and low hygienic behaviour (right - colony number 8) with only 10 % of brood cells cleaned out after 48 h. Photo 2 Photo 3 1. The pinning brood test. After the implementing of this test in order to establish the hygienic behaviour degree there were obtained the following data: - Out of the 25 colonies were the pinning test was applied it was noticed that after 24 h after pinning the brood it was removed between 90% and 99% of brood in 8 bee colonies (32%), being considered with high hygienic behaviour the colonies number 2, 11,12,13,15,18, 22, 25. - With medium hygienic behaviour were identified a number of 10 bee colonies (40%), (between 60% and 90 % brood removing). - Also, a number of 7 bee colonies (28%) were identified as low hygienic colonies (between 20 and 60%). Being taken in a cumulative manner the two tests had a correlation of ~50%, thus, only in 4 cases (4 bee colonies) the killed brood was removed more than 65

90%. Using the both test it was revealed that only in 16% of studied bee colonies the bees were high hygienic behaviour by both tests, in which cases the bees have identified, uncapped and eliminated the most part of the killed bee brood by frozen test and by pinning test, too. Thus, it was found that, out of the 7 bee colonies with high hygienic behavior by freezing test corresponded by pinning test a number of 4 colonies with high hygienic behaviour and 3 colonies with medium hygienic behaviour (the bee colonies number 3, 4 and 7). It was also found that out of 8 bee colonies that responded as high hygienic bee colonies in pinning test 1 colony (number 12) corresponded with medium hygienic behavior in frozen test and 3 colonies (11, 13 and 22) were identified as low hygienic colonies in the same test. The low correlation between the tests in the case of the tree colonies number 11, 13 and 22 could explain the theory of the two model gene which independently controls the dead brood identifying and uncapping activities. The differences revealed by using the two tests need more experimentation and cautions in using a test or another, in selection of the best colonies which show hygienic behaviour. So, in order to select the colonies in breeding apiaries it is useful to apply the both tests in order to establish with more accuracy the colonies with high hygienic behaviour Conclusions Out of 25 studied bee colonies considered as good colonies in terms of honey production were identified a number of 11 bee colonies (44%) which uncapped and removed more than 90% of killed brood and out of these only 4 bee colonies (16%) shown concomitantly by both tests (freezing and pinning tests) a high hygienic behaviour. Comparing with literature data we consider, from our preliminary results - 16% high hygienic colonies- that A.m. carpathica have a good natural resistance to diseases in terms of hygienic behaviour which should be exploited through selective breeding programs The obtained results of these researches underline the fact that in breeding activity is important to use the both tests for a better relevance of the bee colonies with high hygienic behaviour, to establish the best source of the hygienic behaviour genes. Bibliography 1. L. Bekesi, E. Szalaiv - Experiments on hygienic behavior of honey bees 2003, vol 47, no 1, 5-10 - Journal of Apicultural Science (Hungary The Second European Scientific Conference of Beekeeping) 2. V.Vesely - Program of the fight against resistant Varroa mites in Czech Republic 2003, vol. 47, no 1, 113-115, Journal of Apicultural Science 66

3. Marla Spivak and Gary S. Reuter -2001 Resistance to American foulbrood disease by honey bee colonies Apis mellifera bred for hygienic behavior Apidologie 32 (2001) 555-565, 4. K. Wilkes, B. Oldroyd - Breeding hygienic disease resistant bees, a report for the rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Sydney, 2002. 5. Spivak, M, Gilliam M, 1998 Hygienic behavior of honeybees and its application for control of brood diseases and Varroa Bee world (UK) 79: 124-134. 6. Harris J.W., Rinderer T. (USDA) 2004 - Varroa resistance of hybrid ARS Russian honey bees American Bee Journal 144: no 10:797-800. CERCETARI PRELIMINARE PRIVIND DETERMINAREA GRADULUI NATURAL DE REZISTENTA LA BOLI LA ALBINA MELIFERA DIN ROMANIA (A.M. CARPATICA) PE BAZA UNOR TESTE SPECIFICE. CAUIA ELIZA, SICEANU A., SAPCALIU AGRIPINA, CAUIA D. The Institute for Beekeeping Research and Development-Bucharest In ultimii ani, pe plan mondial s-a stabilit ca metodele clasice de tratamentchimioterapice, au un impact negativ in productia apicola sporind rezistenta bolilor la medicamente cu consecinte asupra calitatii produselor apicole. In acest context strategia combaterii bolilor la albine a fost reanalizata si orientata catre gasirea unor solutii alternative, nepoluante de tratament sau combatere a bolilor care sa fie integrate intr-un system eficient de combatere in functie de rasa, clima sau conditii de intretinere. Una din directiile de cercetare abordate este selectia ameliorativa pentru rezistenta la boli combinata cu alte caracteristici morfo-productive sau de comportament dorite sau specifice rasei.in acests ens s-a stability ca la albina mellifera comportamentul igienic joaca un rol foarte mare in comportamentul de aparare in fata bolilor, in special in cazul loci americane. (Rothenbuhler, 1964) si a puietului varos (Gilliam, 1983). Albinele melifere cu comportament igienic pronuntat identifica, descapacesc si indeparteaza puietul infestat, anormal, inainte ca bola sa se imprastie in colonia de albine. Cercetari preliminare efectuate in cadrul unui program de selectie elaborat printr-un proiect de cercetare de excelenta (CEEX Modul II ) au avut ca scop identificarea gradului natural de rezistenta la boli exprimat prin comportament igienic in cadrul populatiei locale de albine melifere apartinanad fondului genetic detinut de ICDApicultura Bucuresti. Key words: honeybees, bee breeding, diseases resistance, hygienic behaviour. 67